Table 3. Archaeology for items in the exhibition ‘Early Cycladic Art in North American Collections’

NAC Object a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 ax Total Figures LN prototypes 2a 1b 3 (nos. 1-3) EC I Plastiras 3c 4d 7 and abstract (nos. 4-10) Transitional 3e 3f 6 Louros and related (nos. 11- 16) Transitional 3g 3 Precanonical (nos. 17-19) EC II folded-arm 67h variety (nos. 20- 87) Kapsala variety (nos. 6i 6 20-25) Spedos variety (nos. 17j 1k 26l 3m 47n 26-58, 73-87) Dokathismata and 4o 10p 14 Chalandriani varieties (nos. 59-72) EC II others 4q 1r 5 (nos. 88-92) Total 31 1 55 4 91

Vessels EC I and I/II 2s 11t 13 collared jars (nos. 93-105) EC I vessels 3u 13v 16 (nos. 106-21) EC II vessels 4w 22x 26 (nos. 122-47) Total 9 46 55 Grand total 40 1 101 4 146y % 27% 1% 69% 3%

This table updates the one published in Gill and Chippindale 1993: 611, Table 2.

David Gill August 2002

a Nos. 1, 3. b No. 2 (‘reputedly found on an islet near Porto Raphti, Attica’; ‘Attica’; ‘said to be from , or the east coast of Attica opposite, near Porto Raphti, perhaps from an islet attached to the mainland in prehistoric times’). See Chippindale and Gill 2000: 486. This confused information undermines the value of the report. c Nos. 8 (‘reputedly found on ’), 9 (‘reputedly found near Marathon’), 10 (‘reputedly found near Marathon’). d Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7. e Nos. 11 (‘reputedly found on Naxos’), 12 (‘reputedly found on ’), 14 (‘reputedly found on Crete’). f Nos. 13, 15, 16. g No. 17, 18, 19. h Nos. 82 and 83 join and are counted once. i Nos. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. j No. 36 (‘reputedly found on one of the small islands southeast of Naxos’), 44 (‘reputedly found on Herakleia’). ‘Reputedly found on Keros’: nos. 38, 39 (also ‘Keros hoard’), 40, 41, 45, 46, 51, 56, 73, 75, 76, 80, 81, 82 [fits no. 83], 87. For no. 43 see ‘ax’. k No. 77 (‘Find place unknown (but very likely from the same source as the Keros hoard, although not part of it)’). l Nos. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 58, 78, 79, 84, 85. m No. 43 (‘Reputedly found on Naxos’; ‘provenance unknown’; ‘quite possibly from the Keros hoard’). No. 74 (‘Naxos’; ‘but possibly from the Keros hoard’). No. 86 (‘reputedly found on ’; ‘but very likely incorrect’). n Nos. 82 and 83 join and are counted once. o Nos. 65 (‘Reputedly found on ’), 68 (‘reputedly found on Paros’), 70 (‘reputedly found on Paros’), 72 (‘reputedly found on Paros’). p Nos. 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 69, 71. q Nos. 88 (‘reputedly found on Keros’), 89 (‘reputedly found on ’), 90 (‘reputedly found on Amorgos’), 92 (‘reputedly found on Amorgos’). r No. 91. s Nos. 97 (‘reputedly found on Paros’), 103 (‘reputedly found on Naxos’). t Nos. 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 104, 105. u Nos. 113 (‘reputedly found on Paros’), 116 (‘reputedly found in eastern Crete’), 119 (‘reputedly found on Paros’). v Nos. 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 117, 118, 120, 121. w Nos. 134 (‘reputedly found on Naxos’), 138 (‘reputedly found near Marathon’), 139 (‘reputedly found near Marathon’), 145 (‘reputedly found on Amorgos’). x Nos. 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135, 136, 137, 140, 141, 142, 143,144, 146, 147. y Nos. 82 and 83 join and are counted once.