Native Trees Field Guide to New Zealand’S Native Trees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Native Trees Field Guide to New Zealand’S Native Trees FIELD GUIDE TO NEW ZEALAND’S NATIVE TREES FIELD GUIDE TO NEW ZEALAND’S NATIVE TREES JOHN DAWSON & ROB LUCAS CONTENTS Introduction 7 Conifers 9 Visual key to conifers 14 Tree ferns 51 Flowering trees 67 This book is derived from New Zealand’s Native Trees by John Dawson and Rob Lucas (2012). Visual key to flowering trees 72 The text was abridged and edited by Sue Hallas. The ‘distinguishing features’ boxes were compiled Glossary 426 by Sue Hallas and Cathy Jones. Thanks to Barry Sneddon and Phil Garnock-Jones for contributing the introductions to conifers and flowering trees Further reading 430 respectively. Thanks also to the photographers who supplied photographs as credited in captions. Index 431 First published in 2012 by Craig Potton Publishing Craig Potton Publishing 98 Vickerman Street, PO Box 555, Nelson, New Zealand www.craigpotton.co.nz Text © John Dawson; photographs © Rob Lucas unless specified otherwise. Design and layout: Jane Connor and Karen Jones Cover design: Chris Chisnall ISBN 978 1 877517 82 2 Printed in China by Everbest This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without the permission of the publishers. INTRODUCTION WHAT'S SPECIAL ABOUT mountains near the treeline, beech forests are of- New ZEALAND'S NATIVE TREES ten swathed in mist, and with the constant high AND Forests? humidity, water drips from every twig. At these New Zealand’s native trees and forests are unique. high altitudes, the trees are often stunted and con- They look, smell and feel like no other forests, torted, giving these subalpine beech forests, often which is not surprising, as more than 80% of the referred to as cloud forests or goblin forests, an otherworldly feel. c. 2300 native species of conifers, flowering plants Elsewhere in the world, and particularly in and ferns in the flora as a whole occur nowhere subtropical and tropical areas, large, attractively else in the world. This remarkably high level of coloured, flamboyant flowers are common and endemism is one of the reasons for New Zealand designed to attract specialist pollinators, such as being recognised by Conservation International as nectar-feeding birds, long-tongued bees, hawk a world biodiversity hotspot. moths and butterflies. In New Zealand there are not There are two main forest types in New Zealand: many butterflies or nectar-feeding birds, and there conifer–broadleaf and southern beech (Nothofagus). are no native long-tongued bees or hawk moths. One of the most striking features of our conifer– New Zealand has few plant species that attract broadleaf forests is the similarity, in many respects, specialist pollinators, most flowers appearing to be to tropical rainforests. They consist of numerous designed to attract all comers, especially the small species, usually in five strata: emergent trees (mostly flies and moths that are abundant. Consequently, conifers); canopy trees, such as tawa (Beilschmiedia many are tiny, greenish to white, and lack specialised tawa); subcanopy trees, such as nīkau (Rhopalostylis structures that restrict access to all but favoured sapida), and Cyathea and Dicksonia tree ferns; pollinators. As if to make up for the modest little shrubby species and small trees; and ground plants. flowers of most of the species, the fruits that fol- Not only are most species evergreen, they exhibit low are often large, colourful and fleshy, and are features that are typical of tropical rainforest species, eaten by birds. such as: plank buttresses, cauliflory and ramiflory, A number of species of New Zealand trees have a pneumatophores and drip-tips (see glossary). Con- distinctive juvenile form. Perhaps the most remark- spicuous, mostly woody vines are common, as are able of these are the lancewoods (Pseudopanax large epiphytes in tree crowns. crassifolius and P. ferox), in which the juvenile form In comparison to conifer–broadleaf forest, beech has long, narrow leaves that are angled downwards forest has fewer species, predominantly Nothofagus around a slender stem, but the adult form has much spp., and a smaller range of plant lifestyles. Even shorter, broader leaves and a densely branched, though the trees are not leafless in the winter, beech broadly rounded crown. Other remarkable ex- forest is more like temperate forests of the Northern amples of juvenile forms are those that are termed Hemisphere. The sparse undergrowth allows the divaricating. Divarication is usually associated with columns of the tree trunks to be seen, the crowns shrubs, which have a densely twiggy form, with very of trees form the roof of the forest, and the small small leaves, and slender, wiry, interlacing stems leaves, on branches often attractively arranged in with wide-angled branching. However, some tree horizontal layers, allow dappled sunlight through species, including mātaī (Prumnopitys taxifolia) and to the forest floor. kaikōmako (Pennantia corymbosa), have shrubby, New Zealand’s southern beeches are notable tangled, divaricating juveniles that grow into tall, for hosting colourful mistletoe parasites. On wet single-trunked adults. 7 WHAT IS A TREE? ABOUT THIS BOOK Trees are woody, single-trunked plants that can reach Like New Zealand’s Native Trees, from which this many metres in height. It may seem obvious that field guide is derived, the book is arranged in three they are different from shrubs, which are woody, parts: Conifers, Tree Ferns and Flowering Trees. multi-stemmed plants that are relatively short, Within these main parts, which each have a brief growing perhaps 3.5 m tall, often less. However, introduction, species are in alphabetical order. the distinction between these two groups is not Scales have not been included alongside illustra- always clear. tions because of the size variability within species; For many of the species included in Field Guide by referring to the measurements given in the text, to New Zealand’s Native Trees, there is no confu- readers will be able to ascertain the approximate sion; they fit neatly into this definition of a tree. scale. However, in the quick-reference visual guide The difficulty in definition arises with plants that to conifers (pages 14–15), flowering trees (pages are mostly shrubby, with multiple trunks, but oc- 72–97) and certain genera (e.g. Coprosma), leaves casionally become single-trunked specimens of 4 m are shown to scale. or more, such as many of the coprosmas; or where Upward-pointing arrows beside clearcut illustra- some individuals usually considered shrubs develop tions of leaves denote the upper surface; downward- conifers substantial branch systems, reaching heights of 4 pointing arrows, the underside. Illustrations are m or more, such as some olearias. Another unclear numbered sequentially for each species entry; where example is when the trunk is so short that the plant an entry continues over the page, the numbering seldom reaches 4 m and so barely attains the height continues in sequence on the new page. of a tree, for example Cordyline banksii. Can these Locations and months for photographs are not plants justifiably be included in a book on trees? given in this field guide, but this information is In deciding which of these hard-to-categorise included in New Zealand’s Native Trees. species to include in this book, we have generally Where a plant included has been classified as a taken an inclusive approach and incorporated woody ‘threatened’ plant under the New Zealand Threat species that, at least occasionally, grow more than 4 Classification System, its threat status has been m tall and either have a single trunk or substantial given as one of three categories: ‘nationally critical’, woody limbs. There are some exceptions to this ‘nationally endangered’ or ‘nationally vulnerable’. rule, where plants have been included to give more Plants that are designated ‘at risk’ under this system complete coverage to a genus. have not generally been noted. 8 WHAT IS A coniFER? fibrous–stringy, furrowed and often light brown, the blade to the leaf base and is typically short in magnification, may be grouped in whitish, waxy as in tōtara, and peeling away from the trunk in conifers. Scale leaves are small, short leaves that usu- bands or patches on protected leaf surfaces as, for Conifer is a Latin word for ‘cone-bearing’ and alludes long, persistent strips. ally lack a petiole and are pressed against the stem example, in mātaī and Libocedrus spp. to cones being the typical reproductive structure of Conifer wood is referred to as softwood and of their branchlet. Needle leaves are much longer The genus Phyllocladus, which is represented this group of plants. Among other things, they are that of flowering trees as hardwood, because of than scale leaves, narrow, parallel-sided, angular or in New Zealand by three species, is very unusual separated from other plant groups by their scale- their differing hardness. Some exceptions are the flattened in cross-section, and mostly pointed at the among the conifers in that its photosynthetic organs or needle-like leaves, or leaf forms that have been ‘softwood’mātaī , which is extremely hard, and the tip. Broad leaves are also much longer than scale are flattened stem structures called phylloclades. derived from them, and by female or seed cones with ‘hardwood’ whau, which is softer and lighter than leaves, flat in cross-section and often widest at the Small, green leaves are present on seedlings and a unique structure. The great majority of conifers, any conifer woods. The most valued native conifer middle, with curved margins that taper gradually or including all New Zealand species, are evergreen. 1. Bark of mature rimu, showing the distinctive ‘contour- timbers include kauri, tōtara, rimu, mātaī and miro. abruptly towards the base and pointed or rounded map’ pattern of ridges.
Recommended publications
  • NEWSLETTER NUMBER 84 JUNE 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 84 JUNE 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2006 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2006 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2006 issue is 25 August 2006 Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 17 Ford Road Christchurch 8002 Send email contributions to [email protected] or [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word (Word XP or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 New Zealand Botanical Society
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 67 MARCH 2002 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Doug Rogan Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2002 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2002 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the June 2002 issue (68) is 25 May 2002. Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 23 Salmond Street Christchurch 8002 Send email contributions to [email protected] Files can be in WordPerfect (version 8 or earlier), MS Word (Word 97 or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascarina Lucida Var. Lanceolata
    Ascarina lucida var. lanceolata COMMON NAME Kermadec Islands Hutu SYNONYMS Ascarina lanceolata Hook.f. FAMILY Chloranthaceae AUTHORITY Ascarina lucida var. lanceolata (Hook.f.) Allan FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No Hutu. Photographer: Bec Stanley ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE ASCLVL CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 26 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS Hutu. Photographer: Bec Stanley 2012 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: IE, OL PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: IE, OL 2004 | Not Threatened BRIEF DESCRIPTION Small bushy tree of upland Kermadec Islands. Leaves narrow and tapering to a narrow tip and with coarse black- tipped teeth on margins. Flowers in clusters of spikes. Fruit small, white. DISTRIBUTION Endemic. Kermadec Islands, Raoul Island only. HABITAT One of the characteristic trees of the wet forests of Raoul Island which are mostly found above 245m. However, in the ravines this tree may extend down to almost sea level. In the wet forest it is mostly a subcanopy tree which co- associates with Coprosma acutifolia, Pseudopanax kermadecensis, Melicytus aff. ramiflorus and on occasion Boehmeria australis subsp. dealbata. Occasionally, such as on the ridge lines and crater rim it may form part of the forest canopy. FEATURES Glabrous gynodioecious tree up to 15 m tall. Trunk up to 500 mm diameter. Bark greyish-white. Branchlets slender, striate, initially pale green maturing dark green to emerald green. Interpetiolar stipules conspicuous, comprising 3 1.2-2.6 mm long pale pink to red, filaments; these connate near base, behind which are 3-6 smaller hyaline filaments. Petioles up to 15-20 mm long, lamina subcoriacous, somewhat fleshy, 50-100 × 10-30 mm, green, emerald green to dark green above, paler beneath, serrations weakly pigmented, pink to pale maroon often fading into pale pink spotting, narrowly lanceolate, lanceolate, lanceolate- oblong to narrowly elliptic, acuminate to acute.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Even-Aged Nothofagus Truncata and N. Fusca Stands in North Westland, New Zealand
    12 DYNAMICS OF EVEN-AGED NOTHOFAGUS TRUNCATA AND N. FUSCA STANDS IN NORTH WESTLAND, NEW ZEALAND M. C SMALE Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand H. VAN OEVEREN Agricultural University, Salverdaplein 11, P.O. Box 9101, 6700 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands C D. GLEASON* New Zealand Forest Service, P.O. Box 138, Hokitika, New Zealand and M. O. KIMBERLEY Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand (Received for publication 30 August, 1985; revision 12 January 1987) ABSTRACT Untended, fully stocked, even-aged stands of Nothofagus truncata (Col.) Ckn. (hard beech) or N. fusca (Hook, f.) Oerst. (red beech) of natural and cultural origin and ranging in age from 20 to 100 years, were sampled using temporary and permanent plots on a range of sites in North Westland, South Island, New Zealand. Changes in stand parameters with age were quantified in order to assess growth of these stands, and thus gain some insight into their silvicultural potential. Stands of each species followed a similar pattern of growth, with rapid early height and basal area increment. Mean top height reached a maximum of c. 27 m by age 100 years. Basal area reached an equilibrium of c. 41 m2/ha in N. truncata and 46 m2/ha in N. fusca as early as age 30 years. Nothofagus truncata stands had, on average, a somewhat lower mean diameter at any given age than N. fusca stands, and maintained higher stockings. Both species attained similar maximum volume of c. 460 m3/ha at age 100 years. Keywords: even-aged stands; stand dynamics; growth; Nothofagus truncata; Nothofagus fusca.
    [Show full text]
  • Dieback in New Zealand Nothofagus Forests!
    Pacific Science (1983), vol. 37, no. 4 © 1984 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Dieback in New Zealand Nothofagus Forests! J. A. WARDLE 2 and R. B. ALLEN 2 ABSTRACT: Dieback has been observed in New Zealand Nothofagus forests for some time, and a number of causal factors have been recognized. Some understanding of the effects of dieback on forest structure has been gained in a study of events after snowfalls had caused partial damage to an area of mountain beech forest. The results of this study are used to interpret the structure of beech forests elsewhere in New Zealand. Nothofagus FORESTS in New Zealand are branch ofthe Rakaia River in inland Canter­ generally associated with mountain environ­ bury. These forests, which clothe the upper ments and are consequently subjected to valley between 650 m altitude and the sub­ frequent disturbance, often ofclimatic origin. alpine timberline at about 1350 m, cover an The effects of these are usually local and area of 5000-6000 ha. The forest is simple contained, but sometimes a relatively minor monotypic Nothofagus solandri var. cliffort­ event may predispose the forest to damage by ioides (Hook. f.) Poole (mountain beech) and other, often biotic, agents causing extensive there are virtually no other tree species dieback of the forest canopy. As yet, there is (Figure 1). little information on the long-term effect of Two hundred and seventeen permanent 2 canopy dieback on forest structure or on the plots, each 400 m , were established through­ characteristics that make one stand vulner­ out the Harper forests during the 1970-1971 able and another not.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes in the Names of New Zealand Tree and Shrub Species
    -- -- - Recent changes in the names of New Zealand tree and shrub species - Since the publication of 'Flora of New Zealand' Volume 1 (A- iii) Podocarpus dacydioides Dacrycarpus ducydioides lan 1961),covering indigenous ferns, conifers and dicots, there (iii)Podocarpus ferrugzneus Prumnopitys ferruginea have been major advances in taxonomic research and the clas- Podocarpus spicatus Prumnopitys taxijolia sification of many plant groups revised accordingly. Most of (iv1 Dacrydium cupressinum (unchanged) these changes have been summarised in the Nomina Nova (v)Dacrydium bidwillii Halocarpus bidwillii series published in the New Zealand Journal of Botany (Edgar Dacrydium bijorme Halocarpus bijormis 1971, Edgar and Connor 1978, 1983) and are included in re- Dacrydium kirkii Halocarpus kirkii cent books on New Zealand plants ie.g. Eagle 1982, Wilson (vi)Dacydium colensoi Lagarostrobos colensoi 1982). A number of these name changes affect important (vii)Dacrydium intermediurn Lepidothamnus intermedius forest plants and as several of these new names are now start- Dacrydium laxijolium Lepidotbamnus laxijolius ing to appear in the scientific literature, a list of changes af- (viii)Phyllocladus trichomanoidi~(unchanged) fecting tree and shrub taxa are given here. As a large number Phyllocladus glaucus (unchanged) of the readers of New Zealand Forestry are likely to use Poole Phyllocladus alpinus Phyllocladus aspleniijolius and Adams' "Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand" as their var. alpinus* * main reference for New Zealand forest plants, all the name changes are related to the fourth impression of this book. * It has been suggested that the Colenso name P, cunnin- it is important to realise that not all botanists necessarily ghamii (1884)should take precedence over the later (18891 ark agree with one particular name and you are not obliged to use name (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Charts for Native to the West Booklet
    26 Pohutukawa • Oi exposed coastal ecosystem KEY ♥ Nurse plant ■ Main component ✤ rare ✖ toxic to toddlers coastal sites For restoration, in this habitat: ••• plant liberally •• plant generally • plant sparingly Recommended planting sites Back Boggy Escarp- Sharp Steep Valley Broad Gentle Alluvial Dunes Area ment Ridge Slope Bottom Ridge Slope Flat/Tce Medium trees Beilschmiedia tarairi taraire ✤ ■ •• Corynocarpus laevigatus karaka ✖■ •••• Kunzea ericoides kanuka ♥■ •• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• Metrosideros excelsa pohutukawa ♥■ ••••• • •• •• Small trees, large shrubs Coprosma lucida shining karamu ♥ ■ •• ••• ••• •• •• Coprosma macrocarpa coastal karamu ♥ ■ •• •• •• •••• Coprosma robusta karamu ♥ ■ •••••• Cordyline australis ti kouka, cabbage tree ♥ ■ • •• •• • •• •••• Dodonaea viscosa akeake ■ •••• Entelea arborescens whau ♥ ■ ••••• Geniostoma rupestre hangehange ♥■ •• • •• •• •• •• •• Leptospermum scoparium manuka ♥■ •• •• • ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• Leucopogon fasciculatus mingimingi • •• ••• ••• • •• •• • Macropiper excelsum kawakawa ♥■ •••• •••• ••• Melicope ternata wharangi ■ •••••• Melicytus ramiflorus mahoe • ••• •• • •• ••• Myoporum laetum ngaio ✖ ■ •••••• Olearia furfuracea akepiro • ••• ••• •• •• Pittosporum crassifolium karo ■ •• •••• ••• Pittosporum ellipticum •• •• Pseudopanax lessonii houpara ■ ecosystem one •••••• Rhopalostylis sapida nikau ■ • •• • •• Sophora fulvida west coast kowhai ✖■ •• •• Shrubs and flax-like plants Coprosma crassifolia stiff-stemmed coprosma ♥■ •• ••••• Coprosma repens taupata ♥ ■ •• •••• ••
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 107 March 2012
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 107 March 2012 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 Subscriptions The 2012 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2012 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the June 2012 issue is 25 May 2012. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467 Wellington Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, as an open text document (Open Office document with suffix “.odt”) or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted. Graphics can be sent as TIF JPG, or BMP files; please do not embed images into documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Ackama Rosifolia
    Ackama rosifolia COMMON NAME Makamaka SYNONYMS Caldcluvia rosifolia (A.Cunn.) Hoogland FAMILY Cunoniaceae AUTHORITY Ackama rosifolia A.Cunn. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE ACKROS Fruit. In cultivation. Nov 2006. Photographer: Peter de Lange CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n=32 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Not Threatened PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened BRIEF DESCRIPTION Small Northland tree. Leaves consisting of 4 to 10 or more opposite pairs of toothed leaflets and a terminal leaflet which have small hairy pits at the junction of the main leaflet veins. Flowers in dense sprays of cream coloured flowers developing into pinkish or red fruits. DISTRIBUTION Endemic. North Island only from near Kaitaia south to just north of Wellsford. Often rather local in its occurrences, particularly south of Whangarei. Fruit. In cultivation. Nov 2006. Photographer: SIMILAR TAXA Peter de Lange Very similar to juvenile foliage of Weinmannia silvicola but can be distinguished by the domatia on the underside of the leaves. These domatia are known as tuft pocket domatia and occur at the junction of the mid-rib and the side vein where there is a pocket of hairs. Makamaka also has huge prominent stipules that are large, green and heavily veined. FLOWER COLOURS Cream, White LIFE CYCLE Hairy carpels dispersed by wind (Thorsen et al., 2009). PROPAGATION TECHNIQUE Can be grown from semi-hardwood cuttings and fresh seed. A fast growing, and rather attractive small tree. However, very drought intolerant, and needs a damp soil and sunny aspect to thrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Drop in Relation to Cone Morphology in Podocarpaceae: a Novel Reproductive Mechanism Author(S): P
    Pollination Drop in Relation to Cone Morphology in Podocarpaceae: A Novel Reproductive Mechanism Author(s): P. B. Tomlinson, J. E. Braggins, J. A. Rattenbury Source: American Journal of Botany, Vol. 78, No. 9 (Sep., 1991), pp. 1289-1303 Published by: Botanical Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2444932 . Accessed: 23/08/2011 15:47 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Botanical Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Botany. http://www.jstor.org AmericanJournal of Botany 78(9): 1289-1303. 1991. POLLINATION DROP IN RELATION TO CONE MORPHOLOGY IN PODOCARPACEAE: A NOVEL REPRODUCTIVE MECHANISM' P. B. TOMLINSON,2'4 J. E. BRAGGINS,3 AND J. A. RATTENBURY3 2HarvardForest, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366; and 3Departmentof Botany, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Observationof ovulatecones at thetime of pollinationin the southernconiferous family Podocarpaceaedemonstrates a distinctivemethod of pollencapture, involving an extended pollinationdrop. Ovules in all generaof the family are orthotropousand singlewithin the axil of each fertilebract. In Microstrobusand Phyllocladusovules are-erect (i.e., the micropyle directedaway from the cone axis) and are notassociated with an ovule-supportingstructure (epimatium).Pollen in thesetwo genera must land directly on thepollination drop in theway usualfor gymnosperms, as observed in Phyllocladus.In all othergenera, the ovule is inverted (i.e., the micropyleis directedtoward the cone axis) and supportedby a specializedovule- supportingstructure (epimatium).
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Scrublands of Northern Fiordland
    80 Vol. 1 FORESTS AND SCRUBLANDS OF NORTHERN FIORDLAND J. WARDLE, J. HAYWARD, and J. HERBERT, Forest and Range Experiment Station, New Zealand Forest Service, Rangiora (Received for publication 18 January 1971) ABSTRACT The composition and structure of the forests and scrublands of northern Fiordland were recorded at 1,053 sample points. The vegetation at each sample point was classified into one of 16 associations using a combination of Sorensen's 'k' index of similarity, and a multi-linkage cluster analysis. The associations were related to habitat and the distribution of each was determined. The influence of the introduced ungulates, red deer and wapiti, on the forests and scrublands was determined. Stand structure was analysed to provide infor­ mation on the susceptibility of the vegetation to damage from browsing and on the history of ungulate utilisation of the vegetation. Browse indices were calculated to provide information on current ungulate utilisation of the vegetation. INTRODUCTION A reconnaissance of northern Fiordland was carried out during the summer of 1969-70 by staff of the Forest and Range Experiment Station. The purpose was to describe the composition, structure, and habitat of the forest and scrub associations, to determine both present and past influence of ungulates on them, and to establish a number of permanent reference points to permit measurement of future changes in the vegetation. The area studied lies between the western shores of Lake Te Anau and the Tasman Sea. The southern boundary is the South Fiord of Lake Te Anau, the Esk Burn and Windward River catchments, and Charles Sound; the northern boundary is the Worsley and Transit River catchments (Fig.
    [Show full text]