Bulletin 180515 (PDF Edition)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
I Have Been Working on a Book, Stand-Ins, on The
Workshop Participants: I have been working on a book, Stand-Ins, on the causes and consequences of temporary leadership in government, business, and religion, which is aimed at a more general audience. Given recent events, I have returned to more traditional scholarship to explore some of the issues involving temporary leadership (and the lack thereof) in federal agencies, among other topics. This paper is brand new, incomplete, and unpolished. Given its length, I would recommend reading the Introduction (pp.1-5), Scope of Actings (pp.13-27), and Statutory Questions (pp.33-42). I look forward to your reactions and suggestions for improvement. AJO Actings Anne Joseph O’Connell Stanford Law School April 1, 2019 Please do not cite or distribute beyond the workshop without permission. I. Introduction Stand-in leaders do not usually command much attention. They step up in moments of need to keep organizations running. The stereotypical interim leader is therefore a caretaker—in place to maintain stability; not to implement major changes. But not all interim leaders are caretakers. Some are auditioning for the permanent job. And a few are there to shake up the organization—so-called “fixers”. The scope of temporary leadership is vast—after all, traditional leaders are transitory, and selection procedures for more permanent leaders take time. On the public side, there are interim leaders in all branches of the federal government. In Congress, there are appointed senators, chosen by their state’s governor to fill in for an elected senator who has died or resigned, perhaps in disgrace or perhaps to take a different job. -
Undeclared War: Unmanned Drones, Human Rights and Collective Security
Undeclared War: unmanned drones, human rights and collective security Susan Carolyn Breau, University of Reading/Mark Olssen, University of Surrey Drones constitute, as Barbara Ehrenreich notes, in her ‘Foreword’ to Medea Benjamin’s Drone Warfare: Killing by remote control, the “ultimate action-at-a-distance weapons, allowing the aggressor to destroy targets in Pakistan or Afghanistan while ‘hiding’ thousands of miles away in Nevada” (Ehrenreich, 2013, p. vii). Yet, as Ehrenreich continues, “it is hard to even claim that their primary use is ‘military’ in any traditional sense. Drones have made possible a programme of targeted assassinations that are justified by the US ‘war on terror’, but otherwise in defiance of both international and US law” (p. viii). She notes how Benjamin in her book documents impressively how “it is the CIA, not the Pentagon, that operates most drone strikes in Western Asia, with no accountability whatsoever. Designed targets…have been condemned without evidence or trial – at the will apparently, of the White House. And those who operate the drones do so with complete impunity for the deaths of any civilians who end up as collateral damage.” (p. viii) Although the technical expertise for producing drones was developed as early as the WWI, and although unmanned aerial vehicles were used for gathering intelligence and for reconnaissance during WWII and during the Vietnam and later Balkan wars, their adaptation to becoming lethal military vehicles for the purposes of attacking and destroying specified targets has taken place more recently. Although Abraham Karem assisted the Israeli’s in developing unmanned robots in the 1970s, and built the first Predator drone in his garage in Southern California in the early 1980s 1, the first official use in military conflict only occurred since 1999 with the NATO Kosovo intervention where unmanned robotic aircraft were adapted to carry missiles “transforming them from spy planes into killer drones” (Benjamin, p. -
The Honorable Robert Wilkie Us Acting
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE FINAL 2 THE HONORABLE ROBERT WILKIE U.S. ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TRAVEL ITINERARY FAYETTEVILLE, NC – WEST PALM BEACH, FL APRIL 17-20, 2018 TRAVELING PARTY: The Honorable Robert Wilkie Peter O’Rourke, Chief of Staff (WPB only) 202-823-(b) (6) Colonel (b) (6) , Special Assistant 202-870-(b) (6) (b) (6) , Deputy Press Secretary 202-897-(b) (6) SECURITY: (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) , Detail Leader 202-391-(b) (b) (6), (b) (7) , Advance 202-657-(b)(6), (C) (6),(b) (b)(7) POCs: (7)(C) (b) (6) (b) , Executive Editor, Fayetteville Observer 910-916-(C) (b) (6) , Braxton Bragg Chapter, AUSA 910-396-(b) /910-624-(b)(6) (6) (b) (6) , Sr. Dir. of Events, Crown Complex 910-438-(b)(6) /910-824-(b) (6) (b) (6) , EA to Director/Facility Planner, FVAMC 910-488-2120 (b)(6) (6) /910-797-(b) (6) (b) (6) (dinner) 910-797-(b) (b) (6) , Office of the Governor 919-814-(b)(6) (b) (6) , Exec. Officer, Womack Medical Center, Ft. Bragg 910-907-(b) /910-849-(b)(6) (6) (b) (6) , EA, Office of President, Methodist University (MU) (6) 910-630-(b) (b) (6) Ph.D., MU 910-630-(b) /910-987-(b)(6) (6) (b) (6) Director of University Relations, MU 910-630-(b)(6) /910-309-(b) (6) (b) (6) (b)(6) (b) (6) Acting Asst. Dir., WPB VAMC 561-422- /606-571- (6) SCHEDULING POCs: (b) (6) , Special Assistant, OSVA (Advance NC only) 202-461-(b) /202-384-(b) (6) (b) (6) Travel Coordinator, OSVA 202-461-(6)(b) /202-281-(b) (6) (6) Tuesday, April 17, 2018 Attire: Casual Weather: Washington, DC H-53°; L-39° – Partly Sunny Fayetteville, NC H-67°; L-50° – Sunny 1500-1600 DEPART U.S. -
PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION of the VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS of the UNITED STATES
116th Congress, 2d Session House Document 116–165 PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES (SUMMARY OF MINUTES) Orlando, Florida ::: July 20 – 24, 2019 116th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 116–165 THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CON- VENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES COMMUNICATION FROM THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, HELD IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA: JULY 20–24, 2019, PURSUANT TO 44 U.S.C. 1332; (PUBLIC LAW 90–620 (AS AMENDED BY PUBLIC LAW 105–225, SEC. 3); (112 STAT. 1498) NOVEMBER 12, 2020.—Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 40–535 WASHINGTON : 2020 U.S. CODE, TITLE 44, SECTION 1332 NATIONAL ENCAMPMENTS OF VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS; PROCEEDINGS PRINTED ANNUALLY FOR CONGRESS The proceedings of the national encampments of the United Spanish War Veterans, the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, the American Legion, the Military Order of the Purple Heart, the Veterans of World War I of the United States, Incorporated, the Disabled American Veterans, and the AMVETS (American Veterans of World War II), respectively, shall be printed annually, with accompanying illustrations, as separate House documents of the session of the Congress to which they may be submitted. [Approved October 2, 1968.] ii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI September, 2020 Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Speaker U. -
FOIA) Document Clearinghouse in the World
This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Received Received Request ID Requester Name Organization Closed Date Final Disposition Request Description Mode Date 17-F-0001 Greenewald, John The Black Vault PAL 10/3/2016 11/4/2016 Granted/Denied in Part I respectfully request a copy of records, electronic or otherwise, of all contracts past and present, that the DOD / OSD / JS has had with the British PR firm Bell Pottinger. Bell Pottinger Private (legally BPP Communications Ltd.; informally Bell Pottinger) is a British multinational public relations and marketing company headquartered in London, United Kingdom. 17-F-0002 Palma, Bethania - PAL 10/3/2016 11/4/2016 Other Reasons - No Records Contracts with Bell Pottinger for information operations and psychological operations. (Date Range for Record Search: From 01/01/2007 To 12/31/2011) 17-F-0003 Greenewald, John The Black Vault Mail 10/3/2016 1/13/2017 Other Reasons - Not a proper FOIA I respectfully request a copy of the Intellipedia category index page for the following category: request for some other reason Nuclear Weapons Glossary 17-F-0004 Jackson, Brian - Mail 10/3/2016 - - I request a copy of any available documents related to Army Intelligence's participation in an FBI counterintelligence source operation beginning in about 1959, per David Wise book, "Cassidy's Run," under the following code names: ZYRKSEEZ SHOCKER I am also interested in obtaining Army Intelligence documents authorizing, as well as policy documents guiding, the use of an Army source in an FBI operation. -
Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts
Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts Susan W. Brenner* with Leo L. Clarke** ABSTRACT Civilian-owned and -operated entities will almost certainly be a target in cyberwarfare because cyberattackers are likely to be more focused on undermining the viability of the targeted state than on invading its territory. Cyberattackers will probably target military computer systems, at least to some extent, but in a departure from traditional warfare, they will also target companies that operate aspects of the victim nation’s infrastructure. Cyberwarfare, in other words, will penetrate the territorial borders of the attacked state and target high-value civilian businesses. Nation-states will therefore need to integrate the civilian employees of these (and perhaps other) companies into their cyberwarfare response structures if a state is to be able to respond effectively to cyberattacks. While many companies may voluntarily elect to participate in such an effort, others may decline to do so, which creates a need, in effect, to conscript companies for this purpose. This Article explores how the U.S. government can go about compelling civilian cooperation in cyberwarfare without violating constitutional guarantees and limitations on the power of the Legislature and the Executive. * NCR Distinguished Professor of Law and Technology, University of Dayton School of Law. ** Associate, Drew, Cooper & Anding, P.C., Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1011 1012 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law [Vol. 43:1011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................. -
America's Undeclared Naval War
America's Undeclared Naval War Between September 1939 and December 1941, the United States moved from neutral to active belligerent in an undeclared naval war against Nazi Germany. During those early years the British could well have lost the Battle of the Atlantic. The undeclared war was the difference that kept Britain in the war and gave the United States time to prepare for total war. With America’s isolationism, disillusionment from its World War I experience, pacifism, and tradition of avoiding European problems, President Franklin D. Roosevelt moved cautiously to aid Britain. Historian C.L. Sulzberger wrote that the undeclared war “came about in degrees.” For Roosevelt, it was more than a policy. It was a conviction to halt an evil and a threat to civilization. As commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces, Roosevelt ordered the U.S. Navy from neutrality to undeclared war. It was a slow process as Roosevelt walked a tightrope between public opinion, the Constitution, and a declaration of war. By the fall of 1941, the U.S. Navy and the British Royal Navy were operating together as wartime naval partners. So close were their operations that as early as autumn 1939, the British 1 | P a g e Ambassador to the United States, Lord Lothian, termed it a “present unwritten and unnamed naval alliance.” The United States Navy called it an “informal arrangement.” Regardless of what America’s actions were called, the fact is the power of the United States influenced the course of the Atlantic war in 1941. The undeclared war was most intense between September and December 1941, but its origins reached back more than two years and sprang from the mind of one man and one man only—Franklin Roosevelt. -
The Massachusetts Antiwar Bill, by Anthony A
Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 1970 The aM ssachusetts Antiwar Bill Anthony D'Amato Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation D'Amato, Anthony, "The asM sachusetts Antiwar Bill" (1970). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 126. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/126 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. The Massachusetts Antiwar Bill, by Anthony A. D'Amato,* 42 New York State Bar Journal 639-649 (1970) Abstract: The Massachusetts Antiwar bill provides that no inhabitant of Massachusetts inducted into or serving in the armed forces “shall be required to serve” abroad in an armed hostility that has not been declared a war by Congress under Art. I, Sect. 8 of the United States Constitution. One could hardly imagine a more fundamental constitutional doubt arising in the mind of the American public than that of the legality of a major war. The purpose of the Massachusetts bill is purely and simply to obtain an authoritative judicial test of the constitutionality of an undeclared war. Tags: Massachusetts Antiwar Bill, Vietnam War, Massachusetts v. Laird, U.S. Constitution Article I Section 8, Prize Cases, Standing [pg639]** One of the most singular pieces of legislation in American constitutional history passed both houses of the Massachusetts legislature on April 1st, 1970, and was signed into law, effective immediately, on the following day by Governor Francis W. -
RAO BULLETIN 15 April 2018
RAO BULLETIN 15 April 2018 PDF Edition THIS RETIREE ACTIVITIES OFFICE BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Pg Article Subject . * DOD * . 04 == Joint Chiefs of Staff ---- (Fat Leonard Impact on Appointments) 07 == F-35 Lightning II [01] ---- (All Deliveries Suspended | Repair Bill Disagreement) 07 == AFRH [12] ---- (Average 55% Fee Increase OCT 2018) 08 == Navy Fleet Size [12] ---- (2016 Need Assessment Down-Play) 09 == Arlington National Cemetery [74] ---- (2nd Future of the Cemetery Survey) 10 == TRICARE Problems Investigated [02] ---- (MOAA Town Hall Disclosures) 10 == TRICARE Premium ---- (45,000 Missing Payment Info to Lose coverage) 11 == Military Enlistment [19] ---- (Dependent's Military Health Record Impact | Navy) 12 == POW/MIA Recoveries ---- (Reported 01 thru 15 APR 2018 | Sixteen) . * VA * . 15 == VA Rehabilitation & Prosthetic Services ---- (Direct Appointment Scheduling Now Possible) 15 == VA Presumptive Disabilities ---- (Top 10 Claimed and Agent Orange) 16 == VA Vacancies ----(Wait Time & Outsourcing Impact) 17 == VA Vet Choice [74] ---- (TriWest Healthcare Alliance Warning Letter to Congress) 18 == VA Vet Choice [75] ---- (Congress Again Urged to Pass VA Reform Package) 19 == VA Baby Showers ---- (Nationwide MAY 5-16 | Welcoming New Children into Vet Families) 20 == VA National Transplant Program ---- (Where To Go) 20 == VA Claim Notice of Disagreement ---- (When to File) 20 == VA Lawsuit | Beemer~John ---- (Allergic Reaction Death Settlement) 1 21 == VA Braille/Talking Book Program ---- (Overview) 22 == VA Disability Benefits [01] ---- (19-Year-Old Pain Precedent Overturned) 22 == CRSC [26] ---- (Are You Missing Out?) 23 == VA Privatization [13] ---- (Debunking The Myth) 24 == VA Privatization [14] ---- (What Does Privatization Really Mean?) 26 == VA Burial Benefits [45] ---- (Hmong and Laotian Vets Now Eligible) 27 == VA Golden Age Games 2018 ---- (To Be Held AUG 3-8 in Albuquerque NM) 28 == VA Secretary [71] ---- (David J. -
Law of War Handbook 2005
LAW OF WAR HANDBOOK (2005) MAJ Keith E. Puls Editor 'Contributing Authors Maj Derek Grimes, USAF Lt Col Thomas Hamilton, USMC MAJ Eric Jensen LCDR William O'Brien, USN MAJ Keith Puls NIAJ Randolph Swansiger LTC Daria Wollschlaeger All of the faculty who have served before us and contributed to the literature in the field of operational law. Technical Support CDR Brian J. Bill, USN Ms. Janice D. Prince, Secretary JA 423 International and Operational Law Department The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 PREFACE The Law of War Handbook should be a start point for Judge Advocates looking for information on the Law of War. It is the second volume of a three volume set and is to be used in conjunction with the Operational Law Handbook (JA422) and the Documentary Supplement (JA424). The Operational Law Handbook covers the myriad of non-Law of War issues a deployed Judge Advocate may face and the Documentary Supplement reproduces many of the primary source documents referred to in either of the other two volumes. The Law of War Handbook is not a substitute for official references. Like operational law itself, the Handbook is a focused collection of diverse legal and practical information. The handbook is not intended to provide "the school solution" to a particular problem, but to help Judge Advocates recognize, analyze, and resolve the problems they will encounter when dealing with the Law of War. The Handbook was designed and written for the Judge Advocates practicing the Law of War. This body of law is known by several names including the Law of War, the Law of Armed Conflict and International Humanitarian Law. -
Name: 00001205
UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/38/651 8 December 1983 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH 'OA/ Thirty-eighth session Agenda item 29 THE SITUATION IN AFGHANISTAN AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY Letter dated 7 December 1983 from the Permanent Representative of Afghanistan to the United Nations addressed to the President of the General Assembly I have the honour to refer to my statement of 23 November 1983 1/ in exercise of the right of reply of my delegation, in the course of which I requested Your Excellency to issue as a document of the General Assembly the full text of my statement which I could not conclude owing to the shortage of time. I have further the honour to submit to you the full text of that statement with the request for its distribution as a document of the General Assembly under agenda item 29. (Signed) M. Farid ZARIF Ambassador Permanent Representative 1/ A/38/PV.69, p. 52. 83-34878 1056u (E) /.. A/38/651 English ANNEX Page 2 Statement by the Permanent Representative of Afghanistan In his statement yesterday in this Assembly, the Head of the Pakistan delegation referred to my Government as a regime which was installed and is being sustained by alien forces. His falacious version of the reality, notwithstanding, we regret the fact that not all delegations abide by the elementary rules of ethics in this Assembly or in their inter-state relations. "Te therefore abstain from calling his government as the Islamabad military regime which is being sustained by bayonets and bullets. -
Nominations Before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Second Session, 109Th Congress
S. HRG. 109–928 NOMINATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, SECOND SESSION, 109TH CONGRESS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON NOMINATIONS OF HON. PRESTON M. GEREN; HON. MICHAEL L. DOMINGUEZ; JAMES I. FINLEY; THOMAS P. D’AGOSTINO; CHARLES E. McQUEARY; ANITA K. BLAIR; BENEDICT S. COHEN; FRANK R. JIMENEZ; DAVID H. LAUFMAN; SUE C. PAYTON; WILLIAM H. TOBEY; ROBERT L. WILKIE; LT. GEN. JAMES T. CONWAY, USMC; GEN BANTZ J. CRADDOCK, USA; VADM JAMES G. STAVRIDIS, USN; NELSON M. FORD; RONALD J. JAMES; SCOTT W. STUCKY; MARGARET A. RYAN; AND ROBERT M. GATES FEBRUARY 15; JULY 18, 27; SEPTEMBER 19; DECEMBER 4, 5, 2006 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( VerDate 11-SEP-98 14:22 Jun 28, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 36311.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 NOMINATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, SECOND SESSION, 109TH CONGRESS VerDate 11-SEP-98 14:22 Jun 28, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 36311.TXT SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 S. HRG. 109–928 NOMINATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, SECOND SESSION, 109TH CONGRESS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON NOMINATIONS OF HON. PRESTON M. GEREN; HON. MICHAEL L. DOMINGUEZ; JAMES I. FINLEY; THOMAS P. D’AGOSTINO; CHARLES E. McQUEARY; ANITA K. BLAIR; BENEDICT S. COHEN; FRANK R. JIMENEZ; DAVID H. LAUFMAN; SUE C. PAYTON; WILLIAM H. TOBEY; ROBERT L. WILKIE; LT. GEN.