DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Spatial Planning Practices to Prevent the Effect of Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Spatial Planning Practices to Prevent the Effect of Environmental Best Spatial Planning Practices to Prevent the Effects of Environmental Noise on Health and Quality of Life GUIDE Best Spatial Planning Practices to Prevent the Effects of Environmental Noise on Health and Quality of Life GUIDE Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie September 2018 AUTHORS Richard Martin, Scientific Advisor Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail Mathieu Gauthier, Scientific Advisor Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie COORDINATED BY Karine Chaussé, Scientific Advisor Christiane Thibault, Head of Scientific Unit Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie Marie-Pascale Sassine, Head of Scientific Unit Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail FORMATTING Véronique Paquet, Administrative Officer Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie TRANSLATION The translation of this publication was made possible with funding from Health Canada. Note: This document was developed from the presentation by Mr. Richard Martin and Mr. Pierre Deshaies at the “2016 Accent on Planning” conference of the Canadian Institute of Planners. This document is available in its entirety in electronic format (PDF) on the Institut national de santé publique du Québec website at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca. Reproduction for the purpose of private study or research is authorized pursuant to section 29 of the Copyright Act. Any other use is subject to authorization by the Québec government, which holds the exclusive intellectual property rights on this document. Such authorization can be obtained by submitting a request to the central clearing house of the Publications du Québec copyright management service using the online form accessible at: http://www.droitauteur.gouv.qc.ca/autorisation.php, or by email at: [email protected]. Data in this document can be cited provided that the source is acknowledged. Legal deposit – 1st quarter 2021 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec ISBN: 978-2-550-82341-4 (French PDF) ISBN: 978-2-550-88682-2 (PDF) Gouvernement du Québec (2021) Best Management Practices to Prevent the Effects of Environmental Noise on Health and Quality of Life Acknowledgements Many people from ministries, universities, research institutes and the public health network helped review the content of this guide. REVISORS Catherine Berthod, Engineer and Planner Direction générale de la sécurité en transport, ministère des Transports du Québec Frédéric Bilodeau, Environmental Health Advisor Direction de santé publique du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue Pierre-Guy Brassard, Engineer Direction des politiques de la qualité de l’atmosphère, ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques Mathieu Carrier, Planner Direction du Plan et de l’aménagement – Région métropolitaine de Montréal, ministère des Transports du Québec Mathieu Chabot-Morel, Planner Direction de l’environnement, ministère des Transports du Québec Marie Chagnon, Programming Officer, Environmental Health Direction de santé publique, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Gaspésie Karine Chaussé, Scientific Advisor Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Pierre Chebou, Transport Analyst Direction du transport aérien, ministère des Transports du Québec Pierre Deshaies, Public Health and Preventive Medicine Medical Specialist and Medical Advisor Institut national de santé publique du Québec and Direction de santé publique, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches Jean-Lou Duchesne, Airport and Civil Aviation Regulations Expert Advisor Direction du transport aérien, ministère des Transports du Québec Marie-Christine Gervais, Scientific Advisor Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Bernard Hétu, Engineer Direction de l’environnement, ministère des Transports du Québec Julien Hotton, Engineer Direction des politiques de la qualité de l’atmosphère, ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques Chantal Jacob, Engineer Direction du transport ferroviaire, ministère des Transports du Québec Michel Lavoie, Public Health and Preventive Medicine Medical Specialist, Sécurité et prévention des traumatismes, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Lucie Laflamme, Environmental Health Advisor Direction de la santé environnementale, ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux Chantal Laroche, Full Professor Audio and Speech-Language Pathology Program, University of Ottawa Karine Martel, Environmental Health Advisor Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec Sophie Paquin, Planner Environnement urbain et santé, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud de l’Île-de-Montréal Institut national de santé publique du Québec I Best Management Practices to Prevent the Effects of Environmental Noise on Health and Quality of Life Stéphane Perron, Public Health and Preventive Medicine Medical Specialist, Medical Officer Environnement urbain et santé, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud de l’Île-de-Montréal Joël Riffon, Planning, Programming and Research Officer Équipe Santé et environnement, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale- Nationale Éric Robitaille, In-house Researcher Centre de référence sur l’environnement bâti et la santé, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Julie Roby, Engineer Direction des chaussées, ministère des Transports du Québec Marion Schnebelen, Director Direction de la santé environnementale, ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux Audrey Smargiassi, Associate Researcher and Associate Professor Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie, Institut national de santé publique du Québec and École de santé publique, Université de Montréal REVISORS FOR THE BACK-UP ALARMS SECTION Sèdoté Ghislain Hounkpe, Prevention-Inspection Expert Advisor Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail Hugues Nélisse, Researcher Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail DESIGNER FOR FIGURE 1 Melissa Sant’Ana, Planning, Programming and Research Officer Direction de la santé environnementale et de la toxicologie, Institut national de santé publique du Québec II Institut national de santé publique du Québec Best Management Practices to Prevent the Effects of Environmental Noise on Health and Quality of Life Table of contents List of tables ........................................................................................................................................... V List of figures........................................................................................................................................VII List of photos ....................................................................................................................................... IX List of initialisms and acronyms ......................................................................................................... XI Legend ................................................................................................................................................ XIII Highlights ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Environmental noise ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Definition ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Environmental noise effects on health and well-being .......................................................... 5 2.2.1 Effects on physical health ......................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Effects on psychosocial health ................................................................................. 6 2.3 Economic effects ................................................................................................................... 7 3 Importance of land-use planning in noise reduction ................................................................. 9 4 Noise and its measurement: some basic elements .................................................................. 11 4.1 Variations of noise levels and perceiving them ................................................................... 12 4.2 Factors that influence the noise level .................................................................................. 13 4.2.1 Factors affecting noise propagation ....................................................................... 13 4.2.2 The human ear’s response and influence of the noise’s characteristics on perceiving it ............................................................................................................. 13 4.2.3 Temporal variation .................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Acoustic assessment study ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noise Barriers
    INDOT’s Goal for Noise Reduction What is Noise? INDOT’s goal for substantial noise Noise is defined as unwanted sound and can come from man-made and natural 2,000 vehicles per hour sounds twice as loud (+10 dB(A)) reduction is to provide at least a 7 sources. Sound levels are measured in decibels (dB) and typically range from 40 as 200 vehicles per hour. dB(A) reduction for first-row receivers to 100 dB. in the year the barrier is constructed. However, conflicts with adjacent Because human hearing is limited in detecting very high and low frequencies, properties may make it impossible to “A-weighting” is commonly applied to sound levels to better characterize their achieve substantial noise reduction at effects on humans. A-weighted sound levels are expressed as dB(A). all impacted receptors. Therefore, the noise reduction design goal for Indiana is 7 dB(A) for a majority (greater than Common Outdoor Common Indoor Traffic at 65 MPH sounds twice as loud (+10 dB(A)) Noise Levels as traffic at 30 MPH. 50 percent) of the first-row receivers. Noise Levels Noise Levels Decibels, dB(A) 110 Rock Band Highway Traffic Noise Barriers: Jet Flyover at 1150ft (350m) 105 What Causes Traffic Noise? 100 Inside Subway Train (NY) The level of highway traffic noise depends on three factors: • Can reduce the loudness of traffic noise by as much Gas Lawn Mower at 3ft (1m) 95 • Volume of traffic as one-half Diesel Truck at 50ft (15m) 90 Food Blender at 3ft (1m) • Do not completely block all traffic noise 85 • Speed of traffic Noise Barriers 80 Garbage Disposal at 3ft (1m) • Can be effective regardless of the material used • Number of multi-axle vehicles 75 Shouting at 10ft (3m) • Must be tall and long with no openings Gas Lawn Mower at 100ft (30m) As any of these factors increase, noise levels increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Noise Systems for Reducing Outdoor Noise
    ACTIVE NOISE SYSTEMS FOR REDUCING OUTDOOR NOISE Biagini Massimiliano, Borchi Francesco, Carfagni Monica, Fibucchi Leonardo, and Lapini Alessandro Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Firenze, via Santa Marta, 3 - I-50139 , Firenze, Italy email: [email protected] Argenti Fabrizio Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università di Firenze, via Santa Marta, 3 - I-50139 , Firenze, Italy An ANC system prototype designed for stationary noise control linked to traditional noise barriers was initially developed by authors in the past years. The encouraging results initially obtained have shown that ANC systems are feasible and should be further investigated to improve their performances. Nevertheless, FXLMS algorithm, considered in the first prototype architecture, is known to be affected by convergence problems that generally arise when a system fails to properly identify the noise to be cancelled; this process may (and often does) yield an instable system, where the control algorithm tries to catch-up its own sound, increasing the overall sound pressure level on the targets as in “avalanche” effect, potentially leading to damage fragile instrumentation. Hence, instability is unacceptable in practical applications and must be avoided or prevented. With this respect, in this manuscript some more robust alternative ANC algorithms have been investigated and experimentally verified. Keywords: active noise control, stability. 1. Introduction Active noise control (ANC) techniques are nowadays becoming more and more refined and reached a high level of maturity that allowed integration in modern acoustic devices, mainly targeted to hearing aids, headphones and propagation of noise in ducts [1, 2]. Only in recent years applications considering open field scenarios have been developed in practice (open spaces, ambient noise prop- agation [3, 4]), being such situations affected by weather phenomena, randomly moving sources and, circumstantially, time-varying emission spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • New ELBRIGHT TOSHIBA HIGH SPEED ELEVATORS Concept of New ELBRIGHT
    New ELBRIGHT TOSHIBA HIGH SPEED ELEVATORS Concept of New ELBRIGHT New ELBRIGHT CONTENTS ●New ELBRIGHT Machine-Room TOSHIBA HIGH SPEED ELEVATORS PRODUCT CONCEPT New technology planning/Group control system Traffic New ELBRIGHT A new concept in high-speed elevators. Elevator technology ·· ❸~❹ Toshiba never stops introducing the latest tech- nologies and polishing its high-speed elevator expertise. Toshiba proves this again with THE GUIDE LINE-1 New ELBRIGHT : a new elevator for a new age. Traffic planning / Group control system ·· ❺~❽ Toshiba engineering has combined to produce the 1-1 Deciding speed ········ ❻ world’s first inverter-control high-speed elevator, SPACE SAVING 1-2 Deciding number of cars ········ ❻ 1-3 Deciding passenger capacity ········ ❼ with the high-efficiency control, energy efficiency, ●Conventional type up to 50% reduction 1-4 Deciding service floors ········ ❼ elevator machine-room in machine room space and quiet operation demanded by today’s society. 1-5 Deciding the layout ········ ❼ 1-6 Operating system ········ ❽ 1-7 Group control system (EJ-1000series) ········ ❽ Soundproofing and harmonic distortion measures THE GUIDE LINE-2 Providing environmentally conscious products (New ELBRIGHT) Toshiba elevator group is promoting the development of environmentally Soundproofing and conscious products, which involves environmentally conscious product design, harmonic distortion the assessment of environmental impact of products and disclosure of the measures ·· 10~14 environmental performance of products. Products are developed
    [Show full text]
  • Sound, Noise and Vibration an Explanation
    Sound, Noise and Vibration An explanation Rupert Thornely-Taylor P5 (1) HOL/10002/0002 Outline of Presentation • What sound is - sources, and ways in which is it transmitted from source to receiver. • What vibration is - sources, and ways in which is it transmitted from source to receiver. • Human perception of sound and vibration. • Measurement scales and indices. • Assessment approaches - relationship between noise and vibration and human response to them. • Ways in which noise and vibration and their effects can be reduced. • Government policy regarding assessment and decision making. • HS2's application of government policy. P5 (2) HOL/10002/0003 Scope of sound and vibration issues SURFACE OPERATION - RAILWAY SURFACE OPERATION - FIXED PLANT UNDERGROUND OPERATION SURFACE CONSTRUCTION TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION P5 (3) HOL/10002/0004 Basics – what sound is • Sound is air oscillation that is propagated by wave motion at frequencies between 20 cycles/per second (Hertz, abbreviated Hz) and 20,000 cycles/second (20kHz). • Sound decays with distance – it spreads out, is reduced (attenuated) by soft ground surfaces and by intervening obstacles. • Sound is measured in frequency – weighted decibels (dBA) approximating the response of the human ear​. • Noise is unwanted sound, which is difficult to measure due to the complexity of the human ear​. P5 (4) HOL/10002/0005 Basics – what vibration is • Vibration is oscillation of solids that can be propagated through wave motion. • Vibration in soil decays with distance and is also attenuated by energy absorption in the soil and by obstacles and discontinuities. • Vibration is mainly of interest in the frequency range 0.5Hz to 250Hz and can give rise to audible sound which is then measured in decibels.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Soundproof Light Aircraft
    1 October 2004 Introduction We first put these ideas down in 1990, in the form of an instruction sheet that we handed out with Super Sound Proofing foam mat. Over the years we’ve expanded them, mostly by feedback from users of the product and have printed thousands of these little booklets. You are invited to pass back your experiences‘ with this and the other products that have been added to our arsenal in the fight against noise. We now have acoustical foam materials to be used in Boats, Trucks and Cars as well as new materials used in Architectural applications for home wall a& ceilings, sound studios, gyms, industrial as well as for band practice in the garage! Our specialty is aircraft applications as it is the most challenging! We are always available for free consulting at anytime for any application, to help you with what we know about methods and materials for sound- proofing. We’ll provide free copies of this booklet to groups and Associations; just let us know how many you need. The latest version of this manual is available from our website at http://soundproofing.org/infopages/soundprf.html © Copyright 1998/2002/2004 by Bill Nash - all rights reserved. Reprint rights granted when full credit is given. 2 Logbook Certification letter: SUPER SOUNDPROOFING CO P.O. Box 985 Vista CA 92085 (760) 752-3030 October I3, 2004 RE: FAA CERTIFICATION OF “SUPER SOUNDPROOFING” MATERIAL To Whom it May Concern: This letter provides information regarding Super Soundproofing Material for which we are the mill distributors. This letter is to certify the material has FAA approval obtained by testing at a FAA approved lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in the Sound Insulation Properties of Bio-Based Materials
    PEER-REVIEWED REVIEW ARTICLE bioresources.com Recent Advances in the Sound Insulation Properties of Bio-based Materials Xiaodong Zhu,a,b Birm-June Kim,c Qingwen Wang,a and Qinglin Wu b,* Many bio-based materials, which have lower environmental impact than traditional synthetic materials, show good sound absorbing and sound insulation performances. This review highlights progress in sound transmission properties of bio-based materials and provides a comprehensive account of various multiporous bio-based materials and multilayered structures used in sound absorption and insulation products. Furthermore, principal models of sound transmission are discussed in order to aid in an understanding of sound transmission properties of bio-based materials. In addition, the review presents discussions on the composite structure optimization and future research in using co-extruded wood plastic composite for sound insulation control. This review contributes to the body of knowledge on the sound transmission properties of bio-based materials, provides a better understanding of the models of some multiporous bio-based materials and multilayered structures, and contributes to the wider adoption of bio-based materials as sound absorbers. Keywords: Bio-based material; Acoustic properties; Sound transmission; Transmission loss; Sound absorbing; Sound insulation Contact information: a: Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology (Ministry of Education), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; b: School of Renewable Natural Resources, LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; c: Department of Forest Products and Biotechnology, Kookmin University, Seoul 136-702, Korea. * Corresponding author: [email protected] (Qinglin Wu) INTRODUCTION Noise reduction is a must, as noise has negative effects on physiological processes and human psychological health.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Assessment Activities
    Noise assessment activities Interesting stories in Europe ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 April 2016 Gabriela Sousa Santos, Núria Blanes, Peter de Smet, Cristina Guerreiro, Colin Nugent The European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation (ETC/ACM) is a consortium of European institutes under contract of the European Environment Agency RIVM Aether CHMI CSIC EMISIA INERIS NILU ÖKO-Institut ÖKO-Recherche PBL UAB UBA-V VITO 4Sfera Front page picture: Composite that includes: photo of a street in Berlin redesigned with markings on the asphalt (from SSU, 2014); view of a noise barrier in Alverna (The Netherlands)(from http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/cutting-noise-with-quiet-asphalt), a page of the website http://rumeur.bruitparif.fr for informing the public about environmental noise in the region of Paris. Author affiliation: Gabriela Sousa Santos, Cristina Guerreiro, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILU, NO Núria Blanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, ES Peter de Smet, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, NL Colin Nugent, European Environment Agency, EEA, DK DISCLAIMER This ETC/ACM Technical Paper has not been subjected to European Environment Agency (EEA) member country review. It does not represent the formal views of the EEA. © ETC/ACM, 2016. ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation PO Box 1 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands Phone +31 30 2748562 Fax +31 30 2744433 Email [email protected] Website http://acm.eionet.europa.eu/ 2 ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/6 Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 2 Noise Action Plans .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Thriving Experience in Physical Working Spaces
    Measuring Thriving Experience in Physical Working Spaces Yasmin Fathy† Erika A. Pärn† Denise J Wilkins†‡ Mohamed Zaki† †University of Cambridge, UK ‡Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK {yafa2, eap47, mehyz2}@cam.ac.uk [email protected] ABSTRACT boosts their creativity and productivity while being in sur- The global pandemic has enforced corporations to shift into roundings that signal the brand of their chosen employers. new working patterns and design upgrades of the physical Employers are simultaneously expected to provide emotional working space - from packed desks to long-term modifica- support and help maintain the well-being of their employees. tions design, putting well-being at the heart of workplace Technology has empowered design of physical remote work- planning. This paper hypothesises the use of technologies to ing spaces - from collaboration tools such as Trello to com- revolutionise work practices for monitoring the well-being in a munication applications such as Slack and Microsoft Teams. physical space. New human-computer interaction approaches However, it does not determine the level of social engagement can be introduced to measure psychophysical and physical or capturing employees’ emotional states. When working with metrics to gauge occupant thriving in indoor office environ- such technologies, employees often choose their verbal and ments. They offer changes to the working environment, e.g. cognitive level of engagement. breaks and lighting to enhance productivity and well-being. This research investigates three domains to measure human The lock-down period has also been recorded to have cre- thriving indoor: (a) methods used in architecture domain to ated a long-term socioeconomic impact and increased the understand the impact of architecture design on human thriv- prevalence of mental health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Communication Barriers, Noise & Physical Barriers
    Overcoming Communication Barriers: Noise and Physical Barriers Noise is one of the most common barriers in communication. It is any persistent or random disturbance which reduces, obscures or confuses the clarity of a message. Physical barriers are closely related to noise as they can obstruct the communication transmission process. Types of noise There are many forms of noise barriers which can occur during the communication process. Some examples are: physical interruptions by people interruption by technology, e.g. ringing telephone, new email, instant message, new Tweets, social media updates external noise e.g. distracting activities going on nearby such as traffic noise outside the building or conversations taking place in or near the room distortions of sound leading to delivery of incomplete messages, e.g. not hearing full words or phrases internal noise – physiological (e.g. blocked up ears), or psychological (e.g. distracting thoughts) the inclusion (in written communication) of irrelevant material or unsystematic approach to the subject matter Noise creates distortions of the message and prevents it from being understood the way it was intended. Comprehension usually deteriorates when there is loud, intrusive noise which interferes with the communication assimilation process. The level of noise is very important. Generally, quiet background noise can easily be filtered out, whereas loud or intrusive noise cannot. Dealing with noise To overcome the noise barrier, the source of the noise must first be established. This may not be easy as the noise may be coming from a conversation in an adjacent room, or from traffic passing by the window. Once the source has been identified, steps can be taken to overcome it.
    [Show full text]
  • 22Nd International Congress on Acoustics ICA 2016
    Page intentionaly left blank 22nd International Congress on Acoustics ICA 2016 PROCEEDINGS Editors: Federico Miyara Ernesto Accolti Vivian Pasch Nilda Vechiatti X Congreso Iberoamericano de Acústica XIV Congreso Argentino de Acústica XXVI Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Acústica 22nd International Congress on Acoustics ICA 2016 : Proceedings / Federico Miyara ... [et al.] ; compilado por Federico Miyara ; Ernesto Accolti. - 1a ed . - Gonnet : Asociación de Acústicos Argentinos, 2016. Libro digital, PDF Archivo Digital: descarga y online ISBN 978-987-24713-6-1 1. Acústica. 2. Acústica Arquitectónica. 3. Electroacústica. I. Miyara, Federico II. Miyara, Federico, comp. III. Accolti, Ernesto, comp. CDD 690.22 ISBN 978-987-24713-6-1 © Asociación de Acústicos Argentinos Hecho el depósito que marca la ley 11.723 Disclaimer: The material, information, results, opinions, and/or views in this publication, as well as the claim for authorship and originality, are the sole responsibility of the respective author(s) of each paper, not the International Commission for Acoustics, the Federación Iberoamaricana de Acústica, the Asociación de Acústicos Argentinos or any of their employees, members, authorities, or editors. Except for the cases in which it is expressly stated, the papers have not been subject to peer review. The editors have attempted to accomplish a uniform presentation for all papers and the authors have been given the opportunity to correct detected formatting non-compliances Hecho en Argentina Made in Argentina Asociación de Acústicos Argentinos, AdAA Camino Centenario y 5006, Gonnet, Buenos Aires, Argentina http://www.adaa.org.ar Proceedings of the 22th International Congress on Acoustics ICA 2016 5-9 September 2016 Catholic University of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina ICA 2016 has been organised by the Ibero-american Federation of Acoustics (FIA) and the Argentinian Acousticians Association (AdAA) on behalf of the International Commission for Acoustics.
    [Show full text]
  • ASI-Products-Brochure-4484329 | Acoustical Surfaces, Inc
    Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. Soundproofing & Acoustical Products 888888..225577..22664433 wwwwww..aaccoouussttiiccaallssuurrffaacceess..ccoomm Echo Eliminator™ Sound Silencer™ Bonded Acoustical Cotton Panels Porous Expanded Polypropylene (P.E.P.P.) Acoustical Panels cho Eliminator is a high performance acous- Product Features: ound Silencer acoustical wall panels and Product Features: tical material made from recycled cotton. Recycled cotton ceiling tiles are an entirely new kind o f Class A Fire Rated EThis product is ideal for noise control applica - ▶Class A Fire Rated Sacoustical panel. Made from Porous Expanded ▶No fiberglass tions. Echo Eliminator can be used as acoustical ▶Lightweight Polypropylene (P .E.P .P.), these panels are Class ▶Moisture resistant (indoor) wall panels or hanging baffles. A fire rated and have both STC and NRC values. ▶Easy to install (adhesive application) ▶Non-fibrous Common applications are school gyms, class - ▶Impact resistant They are tackable, lightweight, and bacteria ▶Impact resistant rooms, lunch rooms, community centers and and fungi resistant. Sound Silencer panels ▶Durable ▶Non-abrasive surface any application where a high performance are great for gymnasiums, ice rinks, swimming ▶Low cost ▶Both STC & NRC ratings noise control product is needed. pools, clean rooms, laboratories, food prepara - ▶High light reflectance ▶Tackable surface Echo Eliminator may contribute to LEED ® credits, ti on areas and anywhere else where noise ▶ ▶ is Class A fire rated and 100% recyclable. It has High performance acoustical absorption control is important. Panels can be applied Bacteria & fungi resistant ▶ ▶ no VOC's, no formaldehyde and requires no Relocatable (with grommets) directly on wall and ceiling surfaces for attractive Lightweight warning labels. It is also fungi, mold, and ▶ and effective sound control.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Selection and Approval of Noise Barrier Products Final Report
    Guidelines for Selection and Approval of Noise Barrier Products Final Report Prepared for: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 25-25, Task 40 Prepared by: ICF International 33 Hayden Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 July 2008 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 40, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. Acknowledgement This study was conducted as part of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 25-25, in cooperation with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the U.S. Department of Transportation. The report was prepared by David Ernst, Leiran Biton, Steven Reichenbacher, and Melissa Zgola of ICF International, and Cary Adkins of Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. The project was managed by Christopher Hedges, NCHRP Senior Program Officer. Disclaimer The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. This report has not been reviewed or accepted by the Transportation Research Board's Executive Committee or the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by NCHRP, the Transportation Research Board or the National Research Council. i Abstract State departments of transportation (DOTs) have identified a need for guidance on noise barrier materials products. This study identified and reviewed literature relevant to noise barrier materials and products with respect to characteristics, testing, selection, and approval.
    [Show full text]