LEAFLETS of WESTERN BOTANY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LEAFLETS of WESTERN BOTANY MT^ LEAFLETS of WESTERN BOTANY INDEX Volumes I to X 1932 TO 1966 LEAFLETS OF WESTERN BOTANY INDEX Volumes I to X 1932 TO 1966 Compiled by JOHN THOMAS HOWELL and ANITA M. NOLDEKE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1968 Published by John Thomas Howell Printed by Gillick Printing, Inc. Berkeley, California FOREWORD This cumulative index to Leaflets of Western Botany is based almost entirely on the published indexes of each of the ten volumes, those of volumes 1 to 7 having been compiled by me, and of volumes 8 to 10 by Anita Noldeke. Unfortunately, in the interest of economy, the earliest indexes are not as com- plete as I might wish, although such deficiencies as have been noted have been made up in the present work. Also included here are all plant names in various lists that were not indexed originally, such as those in Alice Eastwood's catalogue of plants on the Channel Islands (vol. 3, pages 55 to 76) and Jean M. Lindsdale's list of plants on the Hastings Reservation (vol. 7, pages 201 to 218). Besides the correction of certain errors in the volume indexes, we have made further corrections of original text spellings in this cumulative index, corrections that would have appeared in volume errata had they been detected in time. Such corrections in the present index are usually followed by the original misspelling in quotation marks. All names, whether accepted or synonymous, are given in regular (Roman) type, except for new names which are given in heavy (bold face) type. Of these new names, there are more than 1000 in this index. The index to plant names and the index to authors and titles are separated into two sections in this present work, and the material in each is given much as it was in the indexes to volumes. The third section given here, the "Index to subjects and biographic notices," is mostly new. Although it is more sketchy and less analytical than it was originally conceived, it is hoped it will be helpful in directing the search of students for topical material. The "biographic notices" do not include many of the people mentioned in the issue commemorating the cen- tennial of the California Academy of Sciences, volume 7, num- ber 3. The names of those are listed on pages 103 and 104 of that issue. Following the index proper, two appendixes are included. The first of these consists of notes and corrections that have been collected through the years but which have not heretofore been published as errata or elsewhere. The second lists all in- stitutions and persons who have complete sets of this journal. In all the world there are only about 100 complete sets of Leaflets of Western Botany. Acknowledgements. Only with the encouragement and help of many friends through many years has Leaflets of Western Botany been published. Now, without this continuing help, this cumulative index could not have been prepared. To Anita Noldeke go our thanks and appreciation for the long and ardu- ous task of assembling and integrating the indexes of the ten volumes. Without this preliminary work there would have been no cumulative index. For further help in assembling as well as in proof-reading I am grateful to the devoted help of friends and co-workers: Blanche Clear, Helen LaPlant, Virginia Moore, and Sallie Nor- wall. For his generous cooperation and expert advice in matters of print and style, we thank our friend Mark Robertson of Gil- lick Printing, Inc. And finally with deep gratitude we are happy to acknowledge generous financial help from the following toward the publication of this index. California Academy of Sciences California Botanical Club Hester E. Cobb Clare B. Hardham Edgar M. Kahn Lilly E. Kruse Elizabeth McClintock Anita M. Noldeke Lewis S. Rose Gordon H. True, Jr. Ernest C. Twisselmann J. T. Howell California Academy of Sciences April 1968 11 Index to Scientific Names Abelmoschus, 7:274; 8:161 Abutilon abutiloides, 7:249; 8:209, 211 cryptocarpus, 7:282 affine, 8:209 tulipaeflorus, 7:283 albidum, 7:251 Abies alba, 6:183, 184 americanum, 7:253 amabilis, 8:173 amoenum, 8:204, 205 americana, 6: 184 amplexifolium, 7:247 concolor, 8:67; 9:183; 10:290 Anderssonianum, 8:212, 215 Douglasii, 6:188, 190, 196 Andrieuxii, 7:247 mexicana, 6:186, 188 anodoides, 8:216 var. macrocarpa, 6:189 appendiculatum, 8:203 var. taxifolia, 6:186, 195 arboreum, 8:214 glauca, 6:195 arequipense, 8:209, 210 glaucescens, 6:195, 196 aristulosum, 8:211 grandis, 6:58 Arnottianum, 8:212 hirtella, 6:195 asiaticum, 8:214 lasiocarpa, 8:173 attenuatum, 7:251 Lindleyana, 6:186, 188, 196 aurantiacum, 7:253; 8:214 macrocarpa, 6:189, 190 auritum, 7:247;8:211 magnifica, 8:173; 9:175; 10:290 Avicennae, 7:252 Menziesii, 6:182-184 Bakeri, 8:205 mucronata, 6:186 Bakerianum, 7:245 var. palustris, 6:186 Balansae, 8:211 nobilis, 8:173 bastardioides, 7:243 pectinata, 6:184 Bedfordianum, 8:202, 206, 214 procera, 8:173 ssp. discolor var. hirsutum, 8:214 religiosa, 6:197 var. discolor, 8:206, 214 var. glaucescens, 6: 195, 198 benedictum, 8:212 var. Lindleyana, 6:196, 198 benense, 8:211,215 taxifolia, 6:182-184 Berlandieri, 7:253 tlapalcatuda, 6:195 bicolor, 5:190 venusta, 2:96 blandum, 7:251 Abronia alba, 3:60 Brenesii, 7:246 var. platyphylla, 3:60 Bridgesii, 8:215 alpina, 4:102:9:182 Briquetii, 8:214 arenaria, 2:118 Buchii, 7:246 fragrans, 8:74 Calderoni, 7:247 insularis, 3:60 californicum, 7:248, 249 latifolia. 2:118; 3:60; 4:20; 10:263 calycinum, 8:214 maritima, 3:60 carneum, 8:208, 214 mellifera, 2:118 Carterae, 7:248 minor, 3:60 ceratocarpum, 5:189, 190 neurophylla, 3:60 Chittendenii, 7:245 pogonantha, 9:227 cinereum, 8:216 pumila, 5:150 circinnatum, 8:212 umbellata, 2:118; 3:60; 10:263 coahuilae, 7:243 Abutilinae, 5:189 commutatum, 7:252 Abutilon, 5:189; 7:241 confertiflorum, 7:252 sect. Corynabutilon, 5:189; 8:214 cordatum, 8:215 LEAFLETS OF WESTERN BOTANY Abutilon, continued indicum, 7:249; 8:208 cornutum, 8:216 var. hirtum, 8:214 crassifolium, 7:253 inflatum, 8:201 crispum, 6:81; 7:120,251 insigne, 8:202-204 Croizadanum, 7:253 integerrimum, 8:205 cuspidatum, 8:209 itatiaiae, 8:210 cyclonervosum, 8:205 Jacquini, 7:253 cymosum, 8:215 jaliscanum, 7:246 Darwinii, 8:202, 207 Johnsonii, 8:215 densiflorum, 8:212 jujuiense, 8:206 dentatum, 7:253 lanatum, 8:214 dianthum, 8:214 lateritium, 8:203 divaricatum, 8:210, 211, 215, 216 laxum, 8:213 domingense, 7:253 leiospermum, 7:249 Dugesii, 7:248 Lemmoni, 7:252 durangense, 7:253 Leonardi, 7:246 elatum, 7:252 leucophaeum, 7:252 elegans, 8:204, 205, 214 lignosum, 7:253 ellipticum, 7:243 Lilloi, 8:214 erosum, 7:251 lineatum, 8:212 esculentum, 8:208, 214 longifolium, 8:204 eximium, 8:212 longipes, 8:206 falcatum, 8:213 lucianum, 7:251 floribundum, 7:251 Macdougalii, 7:253 Flueckigerianum, 8:214 macranthum, 7:251; 8:205 fluviatile, 8:202 macrocarpum, 8:213 fragile, 7:253 macrophyllum, 8:213 fusicalyx, 8:207 malachroides, 8:207 Gaumeri, 7:249 malacum, 7:244 geminiflorum, 8:203, 206, 214 Malmeanum, 8:206 giganteum, 7:247; 8:209, 210, 215 Marshii, 7:242 glabriflorum, 7:250 megapotamicum, 8:201, 212, 213 Glaziovii, 8:203 melanocarpum, 8:215 globiflorum, 8:212 var. parvifolium, 8:215 Goudotianum, 8:204 membranaceum, 7:243 grandifolium, 8:215 mendocinum, 8:216 Grevilleanum, 8:216 Mexiae, 8:208 Haenkeanum, 7:252 mexicanum, 7:252 haitense, 7:246 minarum, 8:208 Hassleranum, 8:209. 215 mochisense, 7:251 Hemsleyanum, 7:248 molle, 8:208,209,215 Herzogianum, 8:210 mollissimum, 8:208, 215 hirsutum, 8:212 monospermum, 8:206 hirtum, 7:248; 8:208, 214 montanum, 8:205, 214 Holwayi, 7:251 Mouraei, 8:203, 206, 214 Hulseanum, 7:246; 8:215 Muelleri-Friderici, 8:202 hypoleucum, 7:250 multiflorum, 8:209 ibarrense, 8:208 Nelsoni, 7:245 inaequale, 8:203, 213 neovidense, 8:212 inaequilaterum, 8:211 niveum, 8:202 incanum, 7:244 Nuttallii, 7:251 inclusum, 7:246 Ochsenii, 5:190 INDEX TO VOLUMES I TO X 214 Abutilon, continued Sellowianum, 8:202, 205, 213, orientale, 7:242 senile, 8:213 oxypetalum, 8:203, 213 septemlobum, 8:213 Pachecoanum, 7:245 sessilifolium, 7:251 paeoniflorum, 8:213 sidoides, 7:252 Palmeri, 7:3, 130, 250 silvaticum, 8:213 paranthemoides, 8:216 ssp. Buchtienii, 8:213 8:213 Parishii, 7:3, 248 ssp. genuinum, parvifolium, 8:215 ssp. Klugii, 8:213 parvulum, 7:244 simulans, 7:250 pauciflorum, 7:252; 8:209, 215 sonorae, 7:248 pedrae-brancae, 8:202 sordidum, 8:214 pedunculare, 7:252; 8:204, 208, 215 sphaerostaminum, 7:249 peltatum, 8:202 stenopetalum, 8:210 peraffine, 7:253 striatum, 7:244; 8:202 percaudatum, 7:244 subpapyraceum, 7:253 permolle, 7:250, 251 subsagittatum, 7:250 peruvianum, 8:204, 206, 214 sylvaticum, 8:204, 214 petiolare, 8:208 tacuaremboense, 8:214 Peyritschii, 7:245 terminale, 8:211 Picardae, 7:246 texense, 7:251 pictum, 7:251:8:213 Theophrasti, 7:211,247 pilosum, 8:212 Thompsoni, 8:213 pionense, 8:206 Thurberi, 7:242 8:201, 207 Pittieri, 7:244 thyrsodendron, piurense, 8:203 tridens, 7:244 pleiopodum, 7:246 triquetrum, 7:251 Pringlei, 7:243 trisulcatum, 7:243 pseudogiganteum, 8:215 truncatum, 8:212 pubescens, 7:253 tultitlanapense, 7:252 pubistamineum, 8:203 turmiquirense, 8:212 pulverulentum, 8:212, 270 umbellatum, 7:248, 249; 8:210, 211, purpurascens, 8:214, 270 215,216 Purpusii, 7:246 umbelliflorum, 8:207, 209 pyramidale, 8:212 venosum, 8:202,213 quinquelobum, 8:212 vesicarium, 7:253 racemosum, 7:251 virens, 8:214 ramiflorum, 8:210 virgatum, 8:212, 216 ramosissimum, 7:251 var.
Recommended publications
  • Hecastocleideae (Hecastocleidoideae)
    Chapter 16 Hecastocleideae (Hecastocleidoideae) Vicki A. Funk and D.J. Nicholas Hind HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND MORPHOLOGY Carduoideae—'rest of the family' split (see Chapters 12 and 44) and this placement has 100% bootstrap support. Hecastodeis shockleyi A. Gray was described in 1882 and its Its current position is supported by its distinct morphol- unusual morphology and restricted distribution has made ogy and strong support from molecular data. Its near- it sought after for herbarium specimens. This shrub is est downstream neighbor, however, is somewhat tenu- easily identified because of its single flowered heads that ous, because the position of the branch just below it are re-aggregated on a receptacle in groups of one to five (Gochnatieae) has only 65% bootstrap support (Panero heads; each group of heads is subtended by a relatively and Funk 2008) and might collapse into a polytomy large spiny whitish or greenish bract (Fig. 16.1). Gray with Mutisieae s.str. If one does the phylogenetic analysis (1882) commented that is was "a remarkable addition without Hecastodeis, there is no change in the phylogeny to the few known North American Mutisieae, to stand of the family. near Ainsliaea DC. but altogether sui generis and of pecu- liar habit." According to Williams (1977) the generic name Hecastodeis, "... comes from the Greek roots, ekastos TAXONOMY meaning 'each' and kleio meaning 'to shut up'", referring to each flower having its own involucre. The species The genus is monotypic and has always been recognized was named after William H. Shockley one of the first as such since its original description by Gray (1882).
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Botánica Mexicana
    ISSN 0187-7151 Acta Botánica WMMexican Acta Botánica Mexicana Acta Botánica Mexicana (ISSN 0187-7151) es una publicación de Instituto de Ecología, A.C. que aparece cuatro veces al año. Da a conocer trabajos originales e inéditos sobre temas botánicos y en particular los relacionados con plantas mexicanas. Todo artículo que se presente para su publicación deberá dirigirse al Comité Editorial de Acta Botánica Mexicana. Pueden reproducirse sin autorización pequeños fragmentos de texto siempre y cuando se den los créditos correspondientes. La reproducción o traducción de artículos completos requiere el permiso de la institución que edita la revista. Las normas editoriales e instrucciones para los autores pueden consultarse en la página wwwl.inecol.edu.mx/abm Acta Botánica Mexicana está actualmente incluida en los siguientes índices y bases de datos de literatura científica: Biological Abstraéis, BIOSIS Previews, Dialnet, índice de Revistas Mexicanas de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica del CONACyT, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (con cálculo de factor de impacto), Latindex - Catálogo, RedALyC, SciELO, Science Citation Index Expanded y Scopus. COMITÉ EDITORIAL Editor responsable: Jerzy Rzedowski Rotter Producción Editorial: Rosa Ma. Murillo Martínez Asistente de producción: Patricia Mayoral Loera Editores asociados: Pablo Carrillo Reyes Adolfo Espejo Sema Víctor W. Steinmann Efraín de Luna García Jorge Arturo Meave del Castillo Sergio Zamudio Ruiz Ma. del Socorro González Elizondo Carlos Montaña Cambelli CONSEJO EDITORIAL INTERNACIONAL William R. Anderson, University of Michigan, Hugh H. litis, University of Wisconsin, E.U.A. E.U.A. Sergio Archangelsky, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Antonio Lot, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Naturales, “Bemardino Rivadavia”, Argentina México Ma. de la Luz Arreguín-Sánchez, Escuela Nacional Carlos Eduardo de Mattos Bicudo, Instituto de de Ciencias Biológicas, IPN, México Botánica, Sao Paulo, Brasil Henrik Balslev, Aarhus Universitet, Dinamarca John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Horner-Mclaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012
    Horner-McLaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Acer negundo BOX-ELDER Acer nigrum (A. saccharum) BLACK MAPLE Acer rubrum RED MAPLE Acer saccharinum SILVER MAPLE Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE Achillea millefolium YARROW Actaea pachypoda DOLL'S-EYES Adiantum pedatum MAIDENHAIR FERN Agrimonia gryposepala TALL AGRIMONY Agrimonia parviflora SWAMP AGRIMONY Agrimonia pubescens SOFT AGRIMONY AGROSTIS GIGANTEA REDTOP Agrostis perennans AUTUMN BENT Alisma subcordatum (A. plantago-aquatica) SOUTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN Alisma triviale (A. plantago-aquatica) NORTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN ALLIARIA PETIOLATA GARLIC MUSTARD Allium tricoccum WILD LEEK Ambrosia artemisiifolia COMMON RAGWEED Amelanchier arborea JUNEBERRY Amelanchier interior SERVICEBERRY Amphicarpaea bracteata HOG-PEANUT Anemone quinquefolia WOOD ANEMONE Anemone virginiana THIMBLEWEED Antennaria parlinii SMOOTH PUSSYTOES Apocynum androsaemifolium SPREADING DOGBANE ARCTIUM MINUS COMMON BURDOCK Arisaema triphyllum JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT Asarum canadense WILD-GINGER Asclepias exaltata POKE MILKWEED Asclepias incarnata SWAMP MILKWEED Asplenium platyneuron EBONY SPLEENWORT Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN BERBERIS THUNBERGII JAPANESE BARBERRY Bidens cernua NODDING BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens comosa SWAMP TICKSEED Bidens connata PURPLE-STEMMED TICKSEED Bidens discoidea SWAMP BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens frondosa COMMON BEGGAR-TICKS Boehmeria cylindrica FALSE NETTLE Botrypus virginianus RATTLESNAKE FERN BROMUS INERMIS SMOOTH BROME Bromus pubescens CANADA BROME Calamagrostis canadensis BLUE-JOINT
    [Show full text]
  • Comandra Blister Rust Mary W
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION AZ1310 May, 2009 Comandra Blister Rust Mary W. Olsen Comandra blister rust is a native disease in Arizona on ponderosa pine. It also occurs on Mondell pine, a pine species introduced for landscapes and Christmas tree production in Arizona. Comandra blister rust can cause death of ponderosa saplings, but it is not an important disease of mature ponderosa trees. However, infections kill Mondell pine, and they should not be planted within a mile of Comandra. The alternate host for the rust is Comandra pallida, for which the disease is named. Comandra pallida, commonly called bastard toadflax, is a small herbaceous perennial plant found in close association with oak. It has small light pink flowers in terminal clusters and nutlike fruit. It is found throughout Arizona at elevations of 4,000- 8,000 ft. Pathogen: Comandra blister rust, Cronartium comandrae Hosts: Pinus eldarica (Mondell pine, Afghan pine), Pinus ponderosa (ponderosa pine) and Comandra pallida, bastard toadflax Symptoms/signs: Comandra blister rust on Mondell pine. On Mondell pine, Comandra blister rust causes branch dieback and death of trees of all ages. Swollen areas produced on the alternate host, Comandra. These are develop in branches and trunks, and the bark and delicate spores that can travel in air currents only about underlying sapwood die. On pine, orange “blisters” one mile. During the first year, the fungus becomes develop on trunks and branches as the bark splits and established in pine bark, and swollen areas with fruiting ruptures. Infections on Comandra, the alternate host, structures (spermagonia) develop in branches and appear as orange or rusty colored pustules on leaves trunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliwomenbotany00hollrich.Pdf
    88/51 Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California CALIFORNIA WOMEN IN BOTANY Annetta Carter UC Herbarium Botanist, Collector and Interpreter of Baja California Plants Mary DeDecker Botanist and Conservationist of the Inyo Region Elizabeth McClintock California Academy of Sciences Curator, Ornamental Plant Specialist With Interview Introductions by Lincoln Constance, Betty Gilchrist, Peter Rowlands, John Hunter Thomas Interviews Conducted by Carol Holleuffer 1985 Copyright (c) 1987 by The Regents of the University of California This manuscript is made available for research purposes. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: To cite the volume: California Women in Botany, an oral history conducted in 1985, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1987. To cite individual interview: Annetta Carter, "UC Herbarium Botanist, Collector and Interpreter of Baja California Plants," an oral history conducted 1985 by Carol Holleuffer, in California Women in Botany, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1987. Copy No. /| OAKLAND THE DAILY CALIFORNIAN TRIBUNE 1991 May 17, 1991 May 16, I ' . .-,<. TVjW'-wiKjs Annetta Carter, ^UC'Berkeleyl 'botanist dies UC botanist ' I" W-! f . -: ^.,.v X **\; -':.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2018), 43(1): pp. 53–76 © Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364418X696978 Date of publication April 18, 2018 Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae) Makenzie E. Mabry1,2 and Michael G. Simpson1 1Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U. S. A. 2Current address: Division of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, U. S. A. Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract—Cryptantha, an herbaceous plant genus of the Boraginaceae, subtribe Amsinckiinae, has an American amphitropical disjunct distri- bution, found in western North America and western South America, but not in the intervening tropics. In a previous study, Cryptantha was found to be polyphyletic and was split into five genera, including a weakly supported, potentially non-monophyletic Cryptantha s. s. In this and subsequent studies of the Amsinckiinae, interrelationships within Cryptantha were generally not strongly supported and sample size was generally low. Here we analyze a greatly increased sampling of Cryptantha taxa using high-throughput, genome skimming data, in which we obtained the complete ribosomal cistron, the nearly complete chloroplast genome, and twenty-three mitochondrial genes. Our analyses have allowed for inference of clades within this complex with strong support. The occurrence of a non-monophyletic Cryptantha is confirmed, with three major clades obtained, termed here the Johnstonella/Albidae clade, the Maritimae clade, and a large Cryptantha core clade, each strongly supported as monophyletic. From these phylogenomic analyses, we assess the classification, character evolution, and phylogeographic history that elucidates the current amphitropical distribution of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fljeristic SURVJ I'm
    A FLJeRISTIC SURVJ i'M DISTRIBUTION OF THIS OOCUMEKT IS UNLMTEQ "SoelNtfttMA-- l^t A FLORISTIC SURVEY OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN AND VICINITY NYE COUNTY, NEVADA by Wesley E. Niles Patrick J. Leary James S. Holland Fred H. Landau December, 1995 Prepared for U. S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office under Contract No. DE/NV DE-FC08-90NV10872 MASTER DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi• bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer• ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom• mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCS-AIMER Portions <ff this document may lie illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document ABSTRACT A survey of the vascular flora of Yucca Mountain and vicinity, Nye County, Nevada, was conducted from March to June 1994, and from March to October 1995. An annotated checklist of recorded taxa was compiled. Voucher plant specimens were collected and accessioned into the Herbarium at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Fdn22 Northern Dry-Bedrock Pine (Oak) Woodland *Spinulose Shield Fern Or Glandular Wood Fern ( Dryopteris Carthusiana Or D
    FIRE-DEPENDENT FOREST/WOODLAND SYSTEM FDn22 Northern Floristic Region Northern Dry-Bedrock Pine (Oak) Woodland Dry pine or oak woodlands on shallow, excessively drained, loamy soils on bedrock ridges and hillsides or on rock ledges and terraces adjacent to rivers. Crown and surface fires were common historically. Vegetation Structure & Composition Description is based on summary of vegetation data from 47 plots (relevés). Ground-layer cover of forbs and grami- noids typically ranges from 25-75%. The most common vascular plants are Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense), wild sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis), large-leaved aster (Aster macrophyllus), poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), wintergreen (Gaultheria procumbens), and bracken (Pteridium aqui- linum). Lichen- and moss-covered bedrock and boulders typically make up at least 25% of the ground layer. Shrub layer is typically dominated by deciduous species, usually with patchy to interrupted cover (25-75%). Lowbush blue- berry (Vaccinium angustifolium), juneberries (Amelanchier spp.), red maple saplings, and bush honeysuckle (Diervilla lonicera) are the most common species in the shrub layer. Subcanopy is usually absent, but when present, red maple and paper birch are frequent components. Canopy is composed of conifers, hardwoods, or conifers mixed with hardwoods, and is usually patchy (25-50% cover), with openings in areas of exposed bedrock or boulders. Red pine and white pine are dominant on many sites. On other sites, jack pine or northern pin oak are dominant. In mixed forests, conifers often form a supercanopy above hardwood species. Paper birch is often present in the hardwood canopy. Landscape Setting & Soils Glacially scoured bedrock—Common. Landscape is hummocky to rugged. Parent material is non-calcareous drift, usually less than 20in (50cm) deep over bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Rattlesnake-Plantain & Endangered Species Goodyera Repens (L.) R
    Natural Heritage Dwarf Rattlesnake-plantain & Endangered Species Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Endangered Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Federal Status: None DESCRIPTION: Dwarf Rattlesnake-plantain is a small white orchid (family Orchidaceae) of shady conifer or mixed hardwood-conifer forests. The striking dark green leaves, which are variegated with white or pale green markings along the veins, are much more conspicuous than the small white flowers. The leaves are evergreen, oval-shaped, about 2.5 cm (1 inch) long, and arranged in a dense basal rosette. The flower stalks are leafless, grow singly from the centers of the rosettes, and are usually about 15 cm (6 inches) tall. Numerous small flowers about 4 mm long are arranged in a loose spiral around the stem but are typically twisted to the side such that on most plants the spikes of flowers appear one-sided. Plants spread by underground horizontal stems and are often found growing in small clonal patches of several plants. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: Identification of Dwarf Rattlesnake-plantain requires the evaluation of several characters, and careful, precise measurements. Plants with the following characteristics can be identified as Dwarf Rattlesnake-plantain with a high degree of confidence, but some plants will fall somewhat outside Dwarf Rattlesnake-plantain showing the evergreen leaves patterned these conservative specifications and will need further around the midvein and the leafless flower stalk with a one-sided appearing loose spiral of flowers. The insets show the enlarged investigation (see Similar Species below). This species individual flower with its pronounced pouch and the round rostellum blooms in midsummer.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Key to the Saskatchewan Cryptantha Sarah Vinge-Mazer (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre) on Behalf of the Botanical Assessment Working Group
    Taxonomic Key to the Saskatchewan Cryptantha Sarah Vinge-Mazer (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre) on behalf of the Botanical Assessment Working Group Introduction The Botanical Assessment Working Group has been working on placing Saskatchewan’s two perennial Cryptantha species since around 2011, following many questions and confusion from the local botanical community. The use of the name Cryptantha macounii was the source of much of the confusion, for which an explanation is now provided. The name Cryptantha macounii (=Oreocarya macounii) is a true synonym for Cryptantha celosioides (see Simpson). In Saskatchewan (and apparently Montana, see Lesica 2012) this name has instead been applied to Cryptantha spiculifera material. Furthering the confusion, the name Cryptantha nubigena has been applied to both C. spiculifera and C. celosioides in Saskatchewan and appears regularly in older taxonomic keys. The name C. macounii has to be maintained for C. spiculifera material in Sask. for now until the SKCDC can update its database with the name. C. spiculifera has been included as a synonym for C. macounii in the SKCDC vascular plant species list. This key was compiled from several sources and was written to clarify the placement of the Saskatchewan Cryptantha species and serve as interim information until the Flora of North America (FNA) on Boraginaceae is published. It is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Notes • Our two perennial species are retained in Cryptantha in this key but are expected to be moved under the genus Oreocarya in the FNA treatment (see Simpson) • The Manual of Montana Vascular Plants (Lesica 2012) provides species descriptions for all species that occur in Sask.
    [Show full text]
  • CHROMOSOME NUMBERS in COMPOSITAE. IV. Ambrosieael
    Amer, Jour. Bot. 51(4): 419-424.1964. CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN COMPOSITAE. IV. AMBROSIEAEl WILLARD W. PAYNE, PETER H. RAVEN AND DONALD W. KYHOS Department of Botany, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan and Division of Systematic Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California ABSTRACT New chromosome observations are reported for 30 species and varieties from 4 genera of Am­ brosieae: Ambrosia (including Franseria), Dicoria, Humenoclea and Iva. Neither polyploidy nor aneuploidy is known in the genera Dicorea, Hymenoclea or Xanthium. Aneuplcid reduction appears to have played a role in the genome evolution of several species of Iva and Ambrosia. Polyploid species occur in both Iva and Ambrosia and polyploid series exist for at least 5 species or species aggregates of the latter. All available evidence indicates that the primitive chromosome number for the tribe is x = 18, differentiation and speciation having occurred at this level, which is here termed diploid. The group, however, must ultimately have been of polyploid origin from forms with z = 9. THIS is the fourth in a recent series of papers (Payne, 1963). For the present, therefore, we have dealing with chromosome numbers in various deemed it the best course to recognize the group tribes of the Compositae. Materials and methods as a distinct tribe, the Ambrosieae, a treatment are generally those discussed in earlier contribu­ which follows the precedents of Cassini (1834) and tions to this series, the most recent of which is Delpino (1871), and which agrees in general Ornduff et al. (1963). Procedural details have meaning with the remarks or treatments of varied somewhat since work was carried out Bentham (1873), Small (1913), Rydberg (1922) independently by the various workers.
    [Show full text]