DOCSLIB.ORG

Staff Presentation October 1, 2013 Meeting Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Staff Presentation October 1, 2013 Meeting Agenda Adhoc Planning Commission Committee Review of the Virginia Square Sector Plan Virginia Square Site Staff Presentation October 1, 2013 Meeting Agenda • Introductions • Analysis of Office Uses in Virginia Square • Arts/Cultural Facilities in Virginia Square • Discussion of Transportation Concerns • Draft Matrix of Sector Plan Guidance • Discussion & Next steps Analysis of Office Use on Virginia Square Site • Determination that Virginia Square Site is not a critical office location • From a market perspective, Virginia Square neighborhood not a primary office cluster • Residential/mixed-use character • Large institutional presence • In between two existing/emerging primary office clusters – Ballston and Clarendon/Courthouse Analysis of Office Use on Virginia Square Site Analysis of Office Use on Virginia Square Site Analysis of Office Use on Virginia Square Site • Determination that Virginia Square Site is not a critical office location • Sufficient site capacity exists to support future expansion of primary demand driver – large institutions Analysis of Office Use on Virginia Square Site • Determination that Virginia Square Site is not a critical office location • Sector plan use guidance for this site driven in some part by assumption that office use more compatible with potential theater/cultural use • Significant cultural facility that would benefit from office use above accomplished at 3901 N Fairfax • Building form of office building would limit ability to meet other sector plan goals, as compared to a residential building • Plaza size and connectivity • Affordable housing Consideration of Office Use on Virginia Square Site Did Not Consider Short- Term Market Conditions Projections based on known vacancies and deliveries. Source: AED; CoStar Impact of Longer Term Trends for Office Market Demand • Changing Nature of Federal Presence • Off Shoring • Changing Nature of How We Work • Teleworking, Hoteling, Etc. • Reduced Footprint of the Office Worker • Impact of the Silver Line • Increased Office Market Competitiveness • Increased Demand for Urban, Transit-Oriented Residential Development Summary for Virginia Square (1/1/03 – 7/1/13) Development Summary for Virginia Square Office Retail Other Residential Hotel (GFA) (GFA) (GFA) (Units) (Rooms) Completions (1/1/2003 –7/1/2013) 803,054 66,111 165,807 881 85 Demolitions (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) 29,428 21,252 11,000 66 0 Net Increase (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) 773,626 44,859 154,807 815 85 Net Increase by Land Use (%) 40.1% 2.3% 8.0% 46.5% 3.1% Under Construction (as of 7/1/2013) 0 12,815 0 535 0 Approved (as of 7/1/2013) 311,176 14,200 63,985 0 0 Net Increase + Under Construction + Approved 1,084,802 71,874 218,792 1,350 85 Net Increase + Under Construction + Approved by Land Use (%) 37.2% 2.4% 7.5% 50.8% 2.0% Virginia Square Sites with Remaining Office Capacity Development Activity Summary for Virginia Square Summary of Development Activity for Virginia Square Table Residential Number Office (SF) Retail (SF) Other (SF) (Units) Hotel (Rooms) Completions (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) Table 1 803,054 66,111 165,807 881 85 Demolitions (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) Table 2 29,428 21,252 11,000 66 0 Net Increase (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) 773,626 44,859 154,807 815 85 Under Construction 0 12,815 0 535 0 Table 3 Net Under Construction 0 12,815 0 535 0 Approvals 311,176 14,200 195,985 0 0 Table 4 Net Approvals 311,176 14,200 63,985 0 0 Net Increase (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) + Net Under 1,084,802 71,874 218,792 1,350 85 Construction + Net Approvals Office sites with redevelopment potential* 868,040 Not Calculated Not Calculated Not Calculated Not Calculated Demolitions from that scenario 220,805 46,524 0 1 44 Net Increase in office site redevelopment scenario 647,235 -46,524 0 -1 -44 Net Increase (1/1/2003 - 7/1/2013) + Net Under Construction + Net Approvals + Net Remaining 1,732,037 - - - - Office Capacity Scenario Virginia Square Arts/Cultural Facilities Transportation r:l;l System o- ... -Cilonrnoni .. S....,.C:..... li!i!..... ..,... o-... .... -c.-... - --­p ....... b!dd Map Legend o-t.b·A·-~ .. .._-c.rw m- Qar-t.b·--.. - 5f..,... YL Y.._Une · ~tafortT~ - .... RAn O....Oontbl.N .,.,_.., ... ..,~,...,- -Clloo>'ji'CJ - ....... P_ ......... .....,.........Mon·Thu -­Fri ---............Sat ,.,...,....,.,.Sun ... .. -.. - N ~~- o- p b.Metro Is accessible. 0 YL 0 725,770 avg. weekday boardings (May 2013) The Metro system’s core is the destination or transfer point for 80 per cent of all rail riders system-wide. Crowded conditions during peak periods exist currently. Source: Momentum: The Next Generation of Metro, Strategic Plan 2013—2025. WMATA, January 2013. Average daily boardings, Virginia Square Metro station, 1980—2013 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 Series1 1500 1000 500 0 Source: WMATA ridership data, prepared by Crystal Reports, revised 6/2013 Virginia Square Metro station in context Average weekday boardings at Virginia Square for May 2013: 3,695 Rank: 71st of 86 stations Average weekday boardings, Metrorail system, May 2013: 725,770 Average weekday boardings, Arlington stations, May 2013 Pentagon 16,324 Rosslyn 15,632 Pentagon City 15,589 Crystal City 12,594 Ballston 11,590 Court House 7,690 National Airport 6,561 Clarendon 4,829 East Falls Church 4,108 Virginia Square 3,695 Arlington Cemetery 1,768 Rank for Arlington: 10th of 11 stations Source: WMATA ridership data, prepared by Crystal Reports, revised 6/2013 Metro at Virginia Square: Morning entries Morning peak entries: 1723 Direction: West on orange line: 2.6% Maryland: 3.0% Arlington east and south: 12.6% Alexandria and south: 2.0% Washington: 79.5% Principal destinations: Farragut West: 301 Foggy Bottom: 187 McPherson Square: 185 Metro Center: 145 Rosslyn: 103 Union Station: 94 Six stations account for 60% of morning riders. Source: PlanIt Metro, May 2012 data released by WMATA on October 31, 2012 Metro at Virginia Square: Morning exits Morning peak exits: 784 Direction: From west on orange line: 23.4% From Maryland: 25.0% From Arlington east and south: 13.4% From Alexandria and south: 6.4% From Washington: 31.3% Principal origins: Vienna: 86 West Falls Church: 57 New Carrollton: 37 Rosslyn: 35 Union Station: 34 Foggy Bottom 24 Six stations account for 35% of morning riders exiting at Virginia Square. Source: PlanIt Metro, May 2012 data released by WMATA on October 31, 2012 Metro Station Balance: AM Peak Showing station balance during the AM Peak period (May 2012) Shady Grove ~ En tering passengers {)Exiting passengers Re~gt~n Nat' I Airport Braddock Road Eisen I" ower Ave Huntington f ranconla·Sprlngfl eld Source: Greater Greater Washington, November 29, 2012, based upon WMATA ridership data for May 2012 Most balanced stations, morning peak Metro station balance: AM Peak Rank Station Entries Exits Balance 1 Bethesda 3,278 3,269 1.003 2 Pentagon 6,479 6,954 1.07 3 Brookland 2,075 1,914 1.08 4 King Street 2,986 2,712 1.10 5 Mt Vernon Square 1,157 1,323 1.14 6 Crystal City 4,105 4,912 1.20 7 Tenleytown 1,849 2,218 1.20 8 Ballston 4,441 3,656 1.21 9 Union Station 9,712 12,030 1.24 10 Waterfront 1,334 1,015 1.31 (N. B. To acquire balance ratio, divide the larger number by the smaller number.) Source: Greater Greater Washington, November 29, 2012, based upon WMATA ridership data for May 2012 Least balanced stations, morning peak Metro station balance: AM Peak Rank Station Entries Exits Balance 77 Vienna 9,614 768 12.5 78 Branch Avenue 4,828 380 12.7 79 Huntington 6,298 486 13.0 80 Judiciary Square 486 6,515 13.4 81 Farragut North 1,232 16,754 13.6 82 Archives 391 5,596 14.3 83 Arlington 20 303 14.9 Cemetery 84 Glenmont 4,280 236 18.1 85 Smithsonian 323 5,938 18.4 86 Federal Triangle 210 6,617 31.5 System average, morning peak: 5.8 Virginia Square 1723 784 2.2 Source: Greater Greater Washington, November 29, 2012, based upon WMATA ridership data for May 2012 1.1 Goals and Standards The objectives of WMATA's joint development program are to: 1. Promote Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) by giving priority to joint development proposals that contain the following smart growth development principles: reduce automobile dependency; increase pedestrian/bicycle originated transit trips; foster safe station areas; enhance surrounding area connections to transit stations, including bus access; follow good land use principles, including establishing density near transit; provide mixed-use development, including housing in compliance with local laws and requirements; and the promote opportunity to obtain goods and services near transit stations and offer active public spaces. 2. Attract new riders to the transit system-particularly riders who will use underutilized transit capacity in outbound directions and in off-peak time periods by fostering commercial and residential development projects on WMATA-owned or controlled land and on private properties adjacent to Metro stations. 3. Where appropriate to station setting, market dynamics, and local policy, support the establishment of employment centers consistent with TOD design principles and transit system operating and investment needs. Source: Joint Development Policies and Guidelines, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Office of Property Development & Management, Revised: July 25, 2013 Metro “K” line station, platform design Source: WMATA (1977) Ballston Virginia Square Station length: 600’ Station length: 600’ Platform width: 13’ 5-3/8” Platform width: 13’ 5-3/8” Clarendon Farragut West Station length: 600’ Station length: 600’ Platform width: 13’ 5-3/8” Platform width: 13’ 5-3/8” Source: WMATA Metro “K” line station, mezzanine layout Source: WMATA (N.D.) Ballston Virginia Square Nine fare gates Six fare gates Clarendon Farragut West Four fare gates 18+ fare gates Average weekday boardings, May 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloaded and Analyzed the Vehicle Monitoring Data for This Event
    WMSC Commissioner Brief: W-0034 – Fatality at Farragut West Station December 9, February201 2019 Prepared for Washington Metrorail Safety Commission meeting on August 4, 2020 Safety event summary: A customer jumped from the Farragut West platform to the track bed as outbound Blue Line Train 406 entered the station on Track 2 on December 9, 2019 at approximately 12:53 p.m. Upon report of the collision, Metro Transit Police and D.C. Fire EMS were called and third rail power was de- energized on Track 2 at 12:55 p.m. Power was de-energized to Track 1 at 1:07 p.m. Service resumed after 3 p.m. Probable Cause: The customer intentionally placed themselves in front of oncoming train. Corrective Actions: None planned in specific response to this event. Train 3166 broken TWC antenna repaired. Staff recommendation: Adopt final report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Safety & Environmental Management FINAL REPORT OF INVESTIGATION A&I E19675 SMS 20191209#84904 Date of Event: 12/09/2019 Type of Event: Collision (Fatality) Incident Time: 12:54 hrs. Location: Farragut West Station, Track 2 Time and How received by SAFE: 12/09/2019 - 12:55 hrs. - SAFE on-call phone WMSC Notification: 12/09/2019 - 13:09 hrs. WMSC on-call phone Responding Safety officers: WMATA SAFE: Yes, SAFE 203 WMSC: No Other: N/A Rail Vehicle: (L) 3166.3167 x 3114.3115 x 3156.3157 Injuries: Fatal Injury Damage: Car 3166 Broken TWC Antenna Emergency Responders: Metro Transit Police Department (MTPD), Office of Car Maintenance (CMNT), Office of Rail Transportation (RTRA), DC Fire and EMS (DCFD), Safety and Environmental Management (SAFE), Track and Structure (TRST).
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011
    Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011 Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning August 2011 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning Jim Hamre, Director of Bus Planning Krys Ochia, Branch Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Parsons Brinckerhoff Brian Laverty, AICP, Project Manager Nicholas Schmidt, Task Manager 1401 K Street NW, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20005 Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Existing Conditions ES-1 Policies and Procedures ES-2 Future Demand ES-3 Recommendations ES-4 Introduction 1 Study Process 3 Coordination 3 On-Site Observations 3 Operating Issues 3 Future Demand 4 Permitting and Enforcement 4 Existing Conditions 7 Key Observations 8 Operating Issues 9 Policies and Procedures 17 Permitting 17 Enforcement 19 Future Demand 25 Methodology 25 Results 28 Recommendations 33 Facility Design 34 Demand Management 37 Permitting 39 Enforcement 42 Contents | i Figures Figure ES-1: Future Shuttle Demand Estimate ES-4 Figure 1: Location of Peer U.S. Transit Agencies 4 Figure 2: Study Stations 7 Figure 3: Vehicles in Tight Turning Areas May Block Bus Bay Entrances (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 4: Long Kiss & Ride Queue (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 5: Pedestrian Shortcut (Southern Avenue Station) 11 Figure 6: Shuttle Blocking Kiss & Ride Travel Lane (King Street Station) 12 Figure 7: Shuttle Blocking Bus Stop (Anacostia Station) 13 Figure 8: Typical Signs Prohibiting Non-Authorized Access to Station Bus Bays
    [Show full text]
  • New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment
    New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment May 2011 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Final Report Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Planning and Joint Development Office of Station Area Planning and Asset Management May 2011 Lead Agency: Consultant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Parsons Brinckerhoff Authority Dudley Whitney, AICP, Project Manager Station Area Planning and Asset Management 1401 K Street NW Steven E. Goldin, Director Suite 701 Robin McElhenny, Manager of Station Area Planning Washington, DC 20005 John Magarelli, PE, Project Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Assessment of Existing Conditions ES-1 Future Bus Bay Requirements ES-3 Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 7 Station Characteristics 7 Rail Service 9 Bus Service 10 Assessment of Existing Conditions at New Carrollton Metro Station and Recommended Short-Term Improvements 15 Estimate of Future Bus Bay Requirements 25 Future Land-Use 26 Methodology 29 Bus Bay Requirements 30 Future Estimates 31 Appendix A: Calculation of Future Bus Bay Requirements 35 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment List of Figures Figure ES-1: Passenger Queues on the East Side ES-2 Figure 1: New Carrollton Metrorail Station Surrounding Area 1 Figure 2: Overview of the New Carrollton Bus Bays 7 Figure 3: Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Master Sector Plans from Tech Report
    August 2013 Purple Line – Social Effects and Land Use Planning Technical Report 3.2 Affected Environment 3.2.1 Land Use, Zoning, and Planned Development The Purple Line study area comprises a variety of urban and suburban land uses, including residential, commercial, recreational, institutional, and industrial (see Figure 18). Land use in the Montgomery County portion of the corridor is largely residential, with commercial development in Bethesda and Silver Spring. In the Prince George’s County portion of the corridor, land uses include relatively large areas of recreational, institutional, and commercial uses scattered among primarily residential communities. Housing types and densities within the study area include single-family dwellings and both low-rise and high-rise apartment buildings. Clusters of higher density mixed-use development characterize the five major activity centers of Bethesda, Silver Spring, Takoma/Langley Park, College Park, and New Carrollton. With the exception of the area surrounding the University of Maryland (UMD) campus and M Square, most of the remainder of developed land in the study area contains low to medium-density residential and commercial uses. Current zoning concentrates urban growth around activity centers to support transit oriented development (TOD). Specialized TOD zoning districts where mixed-use development is permitted are located in downtown Bethesda and in the areas around the following proposed Purple Line stations, East Campus, College Park, Annapolis Road/Glenridge, and New Carrollton (see Figure 19). The mixed-use and commercial development zoning at other proposed Purple Line station locations also would be compatible with transit stations. Zoning is directed by land use planning efforts, including the Master Plans and Sector Plans discussed in the following section.
    [Show full text]
  • Odenton Station Parking Impact Study
    Odenton Station Parking Impact Study January, 2013 7055 Samuel Morse Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, MD (443) 741‐3500 Odenton Station Parking Impact Study 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION & STUDY PURPOSE .............................................................................. 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 2 A. Current Parking Supply and Utilization ........................................................................... 2 B. Existing Transit Services .................................................................................................. 4 C. Existing Boardings ........................................................................................................... 5 D. Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................ 6 III. PARKING SHED ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 8 IV. ALTERNATIVE COMMUTE ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 10 A. Alternative Park and Ride Lots………………………………………………………….. 10 B. Pricing Analysis…………………………………………………………………………..13 V. FUTURE CONDITIONS................................................................................................... 14 A. Previous Parking Studies ................................................................................................ 14 B. Local Area Network Improvements and TDM .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential for Inclusive Transit-Oriented Development in Prince George’S County
    Unlocking the potential for inclusive transit-oriented development in Prince George’s County Station vision and economic impact December 2020 CONTENTS Executive summary ................................................................................ 1 A closer look at TOD ............................................................................... 7 The County and TOD ....................................................................................8 TOD can take many forms ............................................................................9 TOD in Prince George’s County — barriers and equity ............................... 11 State, County and station barriers to TOD and potential solutions ........................................................................................11 Equity toolkit — promoting equity in Prince George’s County .........................17 Hypothetical TOD visioning model and economic impact analysis ............ 23 New Carrollton .............................................................................................27 Greenbelt .....................................................................................................37 Morgan Boulevard ........................................................................................49 Southern Avenue .........................................................................................59 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 71 Appendix ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Demand Forecasting Technical Report
    Travel Demand Forecasting Technical Report September 2008 Table of Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Background and Project Location ................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.1. Corridor Setting..................................................................................................... 1-2 2. Travel Forecasts for Alternatives Analysis ...................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study...................................................................... 2-1 2.2. No Build Alternative ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3. TSM Alternative............................................................................................................2-5 2.4. Build Alternatives.......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.1. Alternative 3 - Low Investment BRT ................................................................... 2-7 2.4.2. Alternative 4 - Medium Investment BRT ............................................................. 2-7 2.4.3. Alternative 5 - High Investment BRT................................................................... 2-7 2.4.4. Alternative 6 - Low Investment LRT.................................................................... 2-7
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Bid Requests
    • NEWS • INFO EXTRA • BIDS Volume 36, Edition 1M-A • June 19, 2020 Published by SBE, Inc. • DBE/MBE/SBE 1984 36 2020 Baltimore Penn Station High-Speed Rail Project Amtrak is building the foundation for its By Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision and NextGen high-speed rail with several projects, which form the core of Editor’s note: Diversity-owned businesses its near term investment strategy. These projects in the Mid-Atlantic region, particularly those DBEs upgrade infrastructure to increase track capacity, and SBEs certified in Maryland, are invited to bid improve ride quality, and offer greater reliability on Baltimore Penn Station construction projects along the Northeast Corridor. as they proceed during the coming months and A new equipment order for high-speed trainsets, years. The information below is assembled in partnership with the Federal Railroad from Amtrak online sources. Like many other Administration, is intended to expand the Acela publicly funded endeavors, Amtrak projects fleet in the near term and meet the long term require a certain level of participation by small operational needs of NextGen high-speed rail Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) or service in the future. The trainsets are planned Small Business Enterprises (SBEs). Some Amtrak to be introduced into revenue service in 2021. contracts will soon be awarded. Prime contractors, In preparation for the introduction of the new including Skanska and others, are seeking DBE Acela fleet, Amtrak is taking steps to improve and SBE subcontractor and supplier participation. its infrastruc ture for all users and keep Acela Interested DBEs or SBEs should contact the prime the preferred choice for intercity travel in the bidders before the bid due date.
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Cornerstone Plan Was Developed to Be Consistent with the Goals of the MDOT Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP)
    CORNERSTONE PLAN MARYLAND AREA REGIONAL COMMUTER Administrator’s Message Dear Maryland Residents, The Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) has been providing transit services to the State for almost 50 years since its inception as the Metropolitan Transit Authority in 1969. Today, MDOT MTA operates the 12th largest multimodal transit system in the country with over 300,000 daily riders, five transit modes, and paratransit service, while providing support to locally operated transit systems throughout Maryland. In our MARC train operations, MDOT MTA operates 42 stations along 190 miles of track, with employees committed to managing, maintaining, and operating this system that delivers service to nearly 40,000 patrons daily. MDOT MTA is committed to improving the transit experience for our customers every day. To this end, we have adopted the following vision statement: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transit across Maryland with world-class customer service. MDOT MTA’s Cornerstone Plans translate this vision statement into strategic priorities, policies, programs, and initiatives for each of our transit modes. We are committed to responsibly managing our assets, from rail cars to stations, in a manner that supports our operational demands while seeking ways to enhance our customers’ experience. Each Cornerstone Plan synthesizes MDOT MTA plans, policies, and reports, with performance data, local and national trends, and stakeholder input. MDOT MTA comprehensively analyzes this information to create targeted recommendations for investment in each mode that coordinate with the needs of the transit system overall. This Cornerstone Plan highlights MDOT MTA’s long-term plans and priorities for MARC Train over the next 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • NEXT GENERATION HIGH-SPEED RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Major Upgrades Benefiting the Northeast Corridor
    NEXT GENERATION HIGH-SPEED RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Major Upgrades Benefiting the Northeast Corridor Amtrak is upgrading its infrastructure to increase track capacity, improve ride quality and offer greater reliability along the Northeast Corridor. In preparation for the introduction of the new, next generation Acela Express fleet, Amtrak is taking steps to improve its infrastructure for all users and keep Acela Express the preferred choice for intercity travel in the Northeast. While much of the infrastructure improve- ments will take place on the south end of the Northeast Corridor, between Baltimore and Washington, D.C., the enhancements will benefit the full length of the corridor. In general, Amtrak will be constructing a new side high- Project Summary level platform at New Carrollton Station and increasing Timeline: The Next Generation High-Speed Rail Infrastructure the number of high-level platforms at Baltimore Penn Improvements will be complete in 2021 Station to allow for greater operational flexibility and expansion of train service. Amtrak is also working to Funding: RRIF Loan backed by NEC revenues upgrade the last of three tracks between Washington Partner: Federal Railroad Administration Union Station and Baltimore Penn Station to operate at speeds up to 125 mph and improve ride quality for Amtrak has a full fleet of construction equipment such as its Track a more comfortable journey. In addition, Amtrak will be Laying Machine (pictured here), to aid in upgrading the railroad. An overview of the operation demonstrates the Track Laying making improvements to its maintenance facilities to Machine dropping new ties and replacing the rail in an effort to provide best in class servicing of train equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc Tra Marc Train
    EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 9, Have a backup plan to get to EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 9, Union Station! 2013 It’s the five words all MARC passengers dread to N LINE hear: “Delays on the Red Line.” The following Camden Station PEN Camden Station PEN Dorsey Jessup Dorsey Metrobus routes all serve Union Station and come SavageJessup St. Denis Laurel ParkSavage St. Denis Laurel Park TRAIN from various points in the city; download the Laurel TRAIN MuirkirkLaurel RC Muirkirk RC schedules at www.wmata.com Greenbelt MA CollegeGreenbelt Park MA College Park MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATIONMORE Riverdale MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATIONBALTIMORE Riverdale LE/BALTI PERRYVILLE/ GTON D.C. 96 – Woodley Park – Adams Morgan – PERRYVILASHINGTON D.C. TO WASHIN U Street – Union Station TO D6 – Dupont Circle – Farragut North and WEEKDAY SERVICE West (K Street) – Metro Center PERRYVILLE SERVING: ERDEEN DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE RAIL CONNECTIONS ABERDE (E Street) – Judiciary Square – DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE RAIL CONNECTIONS EWOOD EDGEWOOD RT Union Station L EDG RPORT L IN AIRPO MART ION N STATION L PENN STAT RE X1 – Foggy Bottom – Federal Triangle – L L PEN RE L WEST BALTIMO North Capitol and Massachusetts WEST ORPE HALETHORPE Avenue (1 block from Union HA SHALL L WI MARSHA L BWI MAR Station) M B M NTON ODENTON TE WIE STATE BOWIE STA Remember: MARC Weekly or Monthly passes are B OOK SEABROOK TON good for complementary travel on all Washington L SEABR ROLLTON L NEW CARROLL Metrobuses. NEW CAR L UNION STATION L UNION STATION M M In addition, the DC Circulator www.dccirculator.com M M M provides two routes serving Union Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail Station Area Planning a Metrorail Before-And-After Study Report
    Metrorail Station •S. Department of ansportation Area Planning A Metrorail BetoferandiAfter Study Report JUL 3 I August 1983 library ' Status of Jf' Shady Grove mile Metro system \ Uv^yU December 1982 Red Line — Glenmont/Shady Grove Blue Line — Addison Road/Huntington Orange Line — New Carrollton/Vienna Green Line — Greenbelt/Branch Avenue Yellow Line — Franconia-Springfield/Greenbelt PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY MARYLAND FAIRFAX COUNTY Dunn Loring Vienna JitxacosUa ms peniwKw ;ti; -»///////„„^ Atabama Ave vjNaylor Rd FAIRFAX ^ CITY I w Congress% m , ^ Heights ® Branch Awe* Braddock ALEXANDRIA St Barnabas m Van Dorn St Road •The alignment and terminus of the Green Line has not determined Rosecroft been finally .O^OOOOOOOOV^in, ® The WMATA Board of Direc- ^ tors has proposed changes Fairfax Huntington^rV ; 1993 to this route,one of which County would result in an align- o ment terminating at o ,tatei83 \V' Rosecroft o J o Eisenhower Ave Franconia-Springlield ^ VIRGINIA MARYLAND LEGEND 1. Farragut North 10. Waterfront Operating Lines 39,12 miles 44 stations Total mileage— 101.18 2. Farragut West 11. Navy Yard 3. McPherson Square 12. Eastern Market 4. Center 13. Potomac Ave Under Construction or Substantially Complete Total stations—86 Metro 5. Federal Triangle 14. Stadium-Armory 32.4 miles 22 stations 6. Smithsonian 15. Archives Square 0000®00 Under Final Design 19 78 miles 12 stations 7. L'Enfant Plaza 16. Judiciary 8. Federal Center SW 17. Gallery Place Ml Vernon llllllllllllllt®llllllll Remainder of System 9 88 miles 8 stations 9. Capitol South 18. Sq-UDC Area Transit Authority 1986 Projected start of operations for this segment based Wash ngton Metropolitan all stations M D.C.
    [Show full text]