DOCSLIB.ORG

Christianity 101 Repeopling the Earth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christianity 101 Repeopling the Earth Christianity 101: “Repeopling” The Earth Course 101 - Lesson 9 Prepared by: Ptr. Ronnie Tejada (Ref.: CBU Foundation to Build; “The Pentateuch” by L. Thomas Holdcroft) MEMORY VERSE: “I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.” John 15:5 OBJECTIVE: To recognize that without God we can do nothing. But, with God nothing is impossible. INTRODUCTION: Quick review. After the flood: - Noah built an altar - God renewed the covenant - Noah planted a vineyard and get drunk - They traveled to the land of Shinar - They settled down and multiplied DISCUSSIONS: Let’s examine what the Bible says about the following: 1.) HOW MANY LANGUAGES DID THE PEOPLE SPEAK AFTER THE FLOOD? The whole earth spoke one language, and they all had one speech. Genesis 1:1 2.) WHEN THE PEOPLE LIVED IN SHINAR, WHAT DID THEY DESIRE TO DO? After the flood, they traveled east until they came to the land of Shinar. Here they lived, and here is where they conceived their great idea to build a tower to reach into heaven. Genesis 11:4 3.) WHY WAS IT DANGEROUS FOR THE PEOPLE TO CONTINUE TO BUILD THE TOWER? The people were in "unity” with the wrong motive. They could do anything that eventually can hurt them, so God decided to stop them. This is how powerful “unity” is. Genesis 11:6 4.) WHAT DID GOD DO? God came down from third heaven and gave them all different languages. They could not talk together anymore, so they scattered and stopped building. Genesis 11:7-8 5.) WHAT WAS THE NAME OF THE CITY? The city was called "Babel" because God confused the people's language. This is from where the name Babylon comes. Babylon means "confusion". Genesis 11:9 6.) WAS THE EARTH REPEOPLED BY SHEM, HAM, AND JAPHETH? Yes. They scattered all over the earth. A.) Shem had 5 sons, and they settled in Arabia. Genesis 10:22 B.) Japheth had 7 sons, and they settled in Europe and Asia. Genesis 10:2 C.) Ham had 4 sons, and they settled in Africa. Genesis 10:6 Was it possible that Noah met Abraham? Reference: Creation Ministries International 7.) WHO WERE THE ROYAL ANCESTORS OF JESUS CHRIST FROM SHEM TO ABRAHAM AFTER THE FLOOD? A.) Arphaxad (12th descendant) Arphaxad was the first son of Shem, and he was born two years after the flood. He died at the age of 438 years. He was the father of Salah. Genesis 11:10 B.) Salah (13th descendant) Salah was the son of Arphaxad and the father of Eber. He died at the age of 433 years. Genesis 11:12 C.) Eber (14th descendant) Eber was the son of Salah and the father of Peleg. He was the third post deluvian patriarch after Shem. Eber is the founder of the Hebrew race. Genesis 11:14 D.) Peleg (15th descendant) Peleg is the son of Eber, and he was the fourth in descent from Shem. His brother's name was Joktan, and his son's name was Reu. His name was given him because "in his days was the earth divided". Genesis 11:16 E.) Reu (16th descendant) Reu was the son of Peleg and the father of Serug in the ancestry of Abraham. He lived 239 years. He is called “Ragau” in Luke3:35. Genesis 11:18 F.) Serug (17th descendant) Serug is the son of Reu, the father of Nahor, the grandfather of Abraham. Serug had Nahor when he was 30 years of age. Genesis 11:23 G.) Nahor (18th descendant) Nahor is the son of Serug, the father of Terah, and is Abraham's grandfather. Nahor lived 29 years and begat Terah. Genesis 11:25 H.) Terah (19th descendant) Terah is the son of Nahor and was born in Ur of the Chaldees. When he was 70 years old, he had Abram, Nahor, and Haran. Haran was the father of Lot. Through these three, the ancestors of five great families of the earth were born. 1. Israelites - From Abraham and Sarah through Isaac 2. Ishmaelites - From Abraham and Hagar through Ishmael 3. Midianites - From Abraham and his second wife Keturah 4. Moabites- From Haran through Lot and his two daughters 5. Ammonites- From Haran through Lot and his two daughters Terah was an idolater, and he took part of the family and migrated toward Canaan. he died in Haran at the age of 205 years. Genesis 11:24 I.) Abram (20th descendant) Abram is the twentieth ancestor of Jesus Christ. Genesis 11:26 Reference: Wikipedia Review Questions (statement of faith, answer “yes” or “no”): a. I need Jesus in my life. YES or NO? b. Jesus is my protection and my provision. YES or NO? c. Without Jesus, I’m lost. YES or NO? d. Apart from Jesus, I can do nothing. YES or NO? e. With God all things are possible. YES or NO? Memory Verse: “I am the vine; you are the branches. If you ______________ in me and I in you, you will ___________ much fruit; apart from me you can do ______________.” John 15:5 CONCLUSION: 1.) People are ambitious – we have tendency to want to succeed. Genesis portrays humans as so ambitious that they try to compete with, rather than serve, God. This was Adam and Eve’s sin (3:5, 22), and at Babel people were at it again, in a citywide effort. God frustrated theirs plans by confusing their effort. 2.) Sometimes, in our individual lives, we planned with high expectation that end up to frustration. The plan did not materialize the way we want them to be. Most likely, the reason was because we did not seek God’s guidance, we did not consult His plan for us, the instructions of His Word. 3.) We need Jesus in every plans and decisions we are making in our lives. We must seek all the time the leading of the Holy Spirit, the guidance of His Word, for without God we can do nothing. However, with God nothing is impossible (Luke 1:37). We can do (overcome) all things (trials in life) through Christ who gives us strength. (Philippians 4:13) FUTURE TOPICS: - Abraham, Father of Faith; Isaac, Jacob and Joseph; Moses, Israel’s Greatest Leader; The Ten Commandments; Etc. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notable Changes for Life on Earth After the Flood 1026
    NOTABLE CHANGES FOR LIFE ON EARTH AFTER THE FLOOD 1026 ". and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth . ." Before the Flood After the Flood Average life span: 821 years Average life span: 275.1 years see sheet 1023 see sheet 1023 All were vegetarians Meat-eating begins Gen. 1:29-30 Gen. 9:3 No fear exists between man and beasts Fear of man is placed upon animals Gen. 2:19 Gen. 9:2 Earth is watered The physics of heaven and earth are by a mist rising from the ground changed; rain and rainbows form Gen. 2:6 Gen. 7:12; 9:13 There is one continent Pangaea is broken up Gen. 1:9 There are no seasons mentioned Seasons mentioned Gen. 8:22 Punishment of crimes in God's hands Punishment of crimes is given to men Gen. 4:10-12 Gen. 9:5-6, 24-25 1026 Page Two THE GENERATIONS The average life span for The average life span for ten generations born before the ten generations born the flood was 821 years immediately after the flood (Enoch excluded). was 275.1 years. Year Event Year Event 0........Adam Created 1659.....Arphaxad born 130......Seth born 1694.....Salah born 235......Enos born 1724.....Eber born 325......Cainan born 1758.....Peleg born1 395......Mahalaleel born 1788.....Reu born 460......Jared born 1820.....Serug born 622......Enoch born 1850.....Nahor born 687......Methuselah born 1879.....Terah born 874......Lamech born 1949.....Abram born2 Nahor 930......Adam dies (age 930) and Haran follow. 987......Enoch translated (age 365) 1997.....Peleg dies (239) 1998.....Nahor dies (148) 1042.....Seth dies (age 912) 2006.....Noah dies (950) 1056.....Noah born 2027.....Reu dies (239) 1140.....Enos dies (age 905) 2049.....Isaac born 1235.....Cainan dies (age 910) 2050.....Serug dies (230) 1290.....Mahalaleel dies (age 895) 2084.....Terah dies (205) 1422.....Jared dies (age 962) 2097.....Arphaxad dies (438) 1556.....Japheth born.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prolongation of Life in Early Modern English Literature and Culture, with Emphasis on Francis Bacon
    THE PROLONGATION OF LIFE IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH LITERATURE AND CULTURE, WITH EMPHASIS ON FRANCIS BACON ROGER MARCUS JACKSON A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Dr. Reid Barbour Dr. Mary Floyd-Wilson Dr. Darryl Gless Dr. James O‘Hara Dr. Jessica Wolfe ©2010 Roger Marcus Jackson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ROGER MARCUS JACKSON: The Prolongation of Life in Early Modern English Literature and Culture (Under the direction of Reid Barbour) Drawing upon early modern texts of poetry, theology, and natural philosophy written in England and the continent, this dissertation explores the intellectual traditions inherent in Renaissance discourses addressing the prolongation of life. It is organized around two nodal questions: Can life be prolonged? Should it be prolonged? The project hinges upon Francis Bacon (1561-1626), for whom the prolongation of life in the sense of a longer human lifespan serves as the loftiest goal of modern experimental science. Addressing the first question, Part One illustrates the texture and diversity of early modern theories of senescence and medical treatments against the ―disease‖ of old age promoted by Galen, Avicenna, medieval theologians, Jean Fernel, Marsilio Ficino, and Paracelsus. Part Two then demonstrates that Bacon‘s theory of senescence and corresponding therapies nevertheless differ from those of his predecessors and contemporaries in three regards: their attempt to isolate senescence from disease, their postulation of senescence as a process based on universal structures and actions of matter, and their deferral to further experiment for elucidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince William County Police Department Adult Arrests (Sorted By
    Prince William County Police Department Adult Arrests (Sorted by Name) From: 06/15/2021 00:00:00 To: 07/15/2021 23:59:59 Arrest Date Sex DOB Age Name Residence Offense Descr 06/21/2021 00:00:00 M 04/12/1984 37 ABADJI, ROBERT KWABENA 2770 HAVERFORD LOOP APT 301 WOODBRIDGE, VA DRIVING: WHILE INTOXICATED/DUI - 90D LARCENY/THEFT: ALL OTHER - 23H OBSTRUCT JUSTICE: RESIST ARREST WITHOUT FORCE - 90Z DRIVING: FAILURE TO REPORT ACCIDENT/HIT AND RUN - 90Z MISDEMEANOR: ALL OTHER - 90Z DRIVING: REFUSAL OF TEST AND PROCEDURE DUI/DUID - 90Z 06/16/2021 00:00:00 F 04/24/2000 21 ADAMS, TYNIEA JANEE 3804 RUSSELL RD ALEXANDRIA, VA CHILD ABUSE: NEGLECT/NON-VIOLENT (NON PHYSICAL) - 90F DRUG: POSSESSION, INCLUDING IMITATION - 35A FAILURE TO APPEAR (FTA) - 90Z 07/11/2021 00:00:00 F 06/29/1981 40 AGBON-IFO, CHERIE 3565 EAGLE RIDGE DR WOODBRIDGE, VA DOMESTIC ASSAULT, SIMPLE - 13B 06/17/2021 00:00:00 M 09/21/1998 22 AGUELAR, HENRY 2870 GABLERIDGE TURN WOODBRIDGE, VA CONTEMPT OF COURT - 90Z MISDEMEANOR: ALL OTHER - 90Z 06/17/2021 00:00:00 M 09/29/1998 22 AGUELAR, HENRY NOE 2870 GABLERIDGE TURN APT 421 WOODBRIDGE, VA DRUG: POSSESSION, INCLUDING IMITATION - 35A OBSTRUCT JUSTICE: BY THREAT/FORCE - 13C GIVE FALSE INFORMATION TO POLICE - OBSTRUCTION - 26C 07/02/2021 00:00:00 F 10/19/1956 64 AGUILAR, MARIA LUISA 8657 BRUTON PARISH CT APT 112 MANASSAS, VA LARCENY/THEFT: ALTER PRICE TAGS - 26A 06/18/2021 00:00:00 M 04/29/1987 34 AHMED, MOHAMMAD 13086 PILGRIMS INN DR WOODBRIDGE, VA DOMESTIC ASSAULT, SIMPLE - 13B FAILURE TO APPEAR (FTA) - 90Z THREAT: BOMB - 13C DOMESTIC
    [Show full text]
  • Inmate Release Report Snapshot Taken: 9/28/2021 6:00:10 AM
    Inmate Release Report Snapshot taken: 9/28/2021 6:00:10 AM Projected Release Date Booking No Last Name First Name 9/29/2021 6090989 ALMEDA JONATHAN 9/29/2021 6249749 CAMACHO VICTOR 9/29/2021 6224278 HARTE GREGORY 9/29/2021 6251673 PILOTIN MANUEL 9/29/2021 6185574 PURYEAR KORY 9/29/2021 6142736 REYES GERARDO 9/30/2021 5880910 ADAMS YOLANDA 9/30/2021 6250719 AREVALO JOSE 9/30/2021 6226836 CALDERON ISAIAH 9/30/2021 6059780 ESTRADA CHRISTOPHER 9/30/2021 6128887 GONZALEZ JUAN 9/30/2021 6086264 OROZCO FRANCISCO 9/30/2021 6243426 TOBIAS BENJAMIN 10/1/2021 6211938 ALAS CHRISTOPHER 10/1/2021 6085586 ALVARADO BRYANT 10/1/2021 6164249 CASTILLO LUIS 10/1/2021 6254189 CASTRO JAYCEE 10/1/2021 6221163 CUBIAS ERICK 10/1/2021 6245513 MYERS ALBERT 10/1/2021 6084670 ORTIZ MATTHEW 10/1/2021 6085145 SANCHEZ ARAFAT 10/1/2021 6241199 SANCHEZ JORGE 10/1/2021 6085431 TORRES MANLIO 10/2/2021 6250453 ALVAREZ JOHNNY 10/2/2021 6241709 ESTRADA JOSE 10/2/2021 6242141 HUFF ADAM 10/2/2021 6254134 MEJIA GERSON 10/2/2021 6242125 ROBLES GUSTAVO 10/2/2021 6250718 RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL 10/2/2021 6225488 SANCHEZ NARCISO 10/2/2021 6248409 SOLIS PAUL 10/2/2021 6218628 VALDEZ EDDIE 10/2/2021 6159119 VERNON JIMMY 10/3/2021 6212939 ADAMS LANCE 10/3/2021 6239546 BELL JACKSON 10/3/2021 6222552 BRIDGES DAVID 10/3/2021 6245307 CERVANTES FRANCISCO 10/3/2021 6252321 FARAMAZOV ARTUR 10/3/2021 6251594 GOLDEN DAMON 10/3/2021 6242465 GOSSETT KAMERA 10/3/2021 6237998 MOLINA ANTONIO 10/3/2021 6028640 MORALES CHRISTOPHER 10/3/2021 6088136 ROBINSON MARK 10/3/2021 6033818 ROJO CHRISTOPHER 10/3/2021
    [Show full text]
  • Mistranslations of the Prophets' Names in the Holy Quran: a Critical Evaluation of Two Translations
    Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.8, No.2, 2017 Mistranslations of the Prophets' Names in the Holy Quran: A Critical Evaluation of Two Translations Izzeddin M. I. Issa Dept. of English & Translation, Jadara University, PO box 733, Irbid, Jordan Abstract This study is devoted to discuss the renditions of the prophets' names in the Holy Quran due to the authority of the religious text where they reappear, the significance of the figures who carry them, the fact that they exist in many languages, and the fact that the Holy Quran addresses all mankind. The data are drawn from two translations of the Holy Quran by Ali (1964), and Al-Hilali and Khan (1993). It examines the renditions of the twenty five prophets' names with reference to translation strategies in this respect, showing that Ali confused the conveyance of six names whereas Al-Hilali and Khan confused the conveyance of four names. Discussion has been raised thereupon to present the correct rendition according to English dictionaries and encyclopedias in addition to versions of the Bible which add a historical perspective to the study. Keywords: Mistranslation, Prophets, Religious, Al-Hilali, Khan. 1. Introduction In Prophets’ names comprise a significant part of people's names which in turn constitutes a main subdivision of proper nouns which include in addition to people's names the names of countries, places, months, days, holidays etc. In terms of translation, many translators opt for transliterating proper names thinking that transliteration is a straightforward process depending on an idea deeply rooted in many people's minds that proper nouns are never translated or that the translation of proper names is as Vermes (2003:17) states "a simple automatic process of transference from one language to another." However, in the real world the issue is different viz.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah Aboard the Ark… 10) Strange, We Haven’T Seen Another Boat for Weeks
    THROUGH THE BIBLE STUDY GENESIS 7-10 Here are the Top 10 statements uttered by Noah aboard the Ark… 10) Strange, we haven’t seen another boat for weeks. 9) If only I had brought along more rhino litter. 8) I never want to sleep in a waterbed again. 7) Fish for supper – again? 6) Does anyone have more Dramamine? 5) What? You don’t have film to photograph the rainbow? 4) Honey, please stop saying, “Into each life a little rain must fall.” 3) How can I fish with just two worms? 2) God, are you sure I don’t need to keep the termites in a tin can? 1) And as Noah exited the Ark, he slapped the back of his neck and mumbled, “I should’ve killed those lousy mosquitoes while I had the chance!” In the first six chapters of Genesis God goes from good to grieved. After His creation “God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good.” But by chapter 6, the world was so wicked God was grieved He had made man – and the only way for God to save us was to destroy the earth and start over… And a man named Noah “found grace in the eyes of the Lord.” Noah was told to build a boat – an Ark - then gather his wife, his three sons, their wives, and two of every kind of [1 animal on the earth. Noah was obedient… Which is where we pick it up tonight, chapter 7, “Then the LORD said to Noah, "Come into the ark, you and all your household, because I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation.” What a moving scene… When it’s time to board the Ark, God doesn’t tell Noah to go onto the ark, but to “come into the ark” – the implication is that God is onboard waiting for Noah.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Terror
    Biblical Terror BIBLICAL TERROR Why Law and Restoration in the Bible Depend Upon Fear Jeremiah W. Cataldo T&T CLARK Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA BLOOMSBURY, T&T CLARK and the T&T Clark logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2017 Paperback edition fi rst published 2018 Copyright © Jeremiah W. Cataldo, 2017 Jeremiah W. Cataldo has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identifi ed as Author of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third-party websites referred to or in this book. All internet addresses given in this book were correct at the time of going to press. The author and publisher regret any inconvenience caused if addresses have changed or sites have ceased to exist, but can accept no responsibility for any such changes. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56767-081-6 PB: 978-0-56768-262-8 ePDF: 978-0-56767-082-3 ePUB: 978-0-56767-083-0 Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) To fi nd out more about our authors and books visit www.bloomsbury.com and sign up for our newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture: the Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A
    The Authority of Scripture: The Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A. Nagasawa, June 2005 Four Main Differences in the Genealogies Provided by Matthew and Luke 1. Is Jesus descended through the line of Solomon (Mt) or the line of Nathan (Lk)? Or both? 2. Are there 27 people from David to Jesus (Mt) or 42 (Lk)? 3. Who was Joseph’s father? Jacob (Mt) or Heli (Lk)? 4. What is the lineage of Shealtiel and Zerubbabel? a. Are they the same father-son pair in Mt as in Lk? (Apparently popular father-son names were repeated across families – as with Jacob and Joseph in Matthew’s genealogy) If not, then no problem. I will, for purposes of this discussion, assume that they are not the same father-son pair. b. If so, then there is another problem: i. Who was Shealtiel’s father? Jeconiah (Mt) or Neri (Lk)? ii. Who was Zerubbabel’s son? Abihud (Mt) or Rhesa (Lk)? And where are these two in the list of 1 Chronicles 3:19-20 ( 19b the sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam and Hananiah, and Shelomith was their sister; 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed, five)? Cultural Factors 1. Simple remarriage. It is likely that in most marriages, men were older and women were younger (e.g. Joseph and Mary). So it is also likely that when husbands died, many women remarried. This was true in ancient times: Boaz married the widow Ruth, David married the widow Bathsheba after Uriah was killed. It also seems likely to have been true in classical, 1 st century times: Paul (in Rom.7:1-3) suggests that this is at least somewhat common in the Jewish community (‘I speak to those under the Law’ he says) in the 1 st century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Figure of Joseph the Patriarch in the New Testament and the Early Church
    ABSTRACT “Much More Ours Than Yours”: The Figure of Joseph the Patriarch in the New Testament and the Early Church by John Lee Fortner This paper investigates the figure of Joseph the patriarch in early Christian interpretation, demonstrating the importance of such figures in articulating a Christian reading of the history of Israel, and the importance of this reading in the identity formation of early Christianity. The paper also illumines the debt of this Christian reading of Israel’s history to the work of Hellenistic Judaism. The figure of Joseph the patriarch is traced through early Christian interpretation, primarily from the Eastern Church tradition up to the 4th century C.E. The key methodological approach is an analysis of how the early church employed typological, allegorical, and moral exegesis in its construction of Joseph as a “Christian saint of the Old Testament.” A figure who, to borrow Justin Martyr’s phrase, became in the Christian identity “much more ours than yours.” “Much More Ours Than Yours”: The Figure of Joseph the Patriarch in the New Testament and the Early Church A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by John Lee Fortner Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2004 Advisor ________________________ Dr. Edwin Yamauchi Reader ________________________ Dr. Charlotte Goldy Reader _________________________ Dr. Wietse de Boer Table of Contents Introduction 1 Early Christian Hermeneutics 1 The Aura of Antiquity 6 Apologetics of Hellenistic Judaism 8 Scope and Purpose of Study 12 1. Joseph in the New Testament 13 Acts 7 14 Heb 11 15 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Only the Righteous Escape God's Wrath
    Through the Bible Series: Genesis Passage for This Week: Only the Righteous Escape Genesis 6:9-8:19 God’s Wrath Key Terms: Violence: The Hebrew Introduction: word is much broader than Were you one of those kids shaking under the blankets during a just murder. It is used to thunderstorm? Running and screaming to mom and dad when include unjust treatment lightning struck? Maybe you have had to hold a child and calm him (Gen 16:5; Amos 3:10), or her back to sleep during a torrential downpour. Imagine the anxiety in Noah’s heart, wondering if his pitch was strong enough to injurious legal testimony seal cypress against the strongest historical winds. Imagine telling (Deut 19:16), deadly Shem that he would live through twenty five more nights of thunder assault (Gen 49:5), and as the boat rocked another wave. How? By finding comfort in the rape (Jer 13:22). knowledge that God was near and had promised safety. Gopher Wood: This is a The Place of the Passage: transliteration of the God’s creation was marred by sin, and as the population grew so did Hebrew word. While the evil’s reach. Murder and immorality are introduced into society, and exact specie of tree is eventually God’s judgment comes swiftly. God only allows a few to survive the flood, but His covenant after the waters subside offers unknown, many modern blessing to the world’s future generations. translations render the term as “cypress” (e.g. NEB, NIV, NRSV). I. Primeval History: Creating for Blessing (1:11-11:26) A.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Name? a Look at Genealogies… 1. Study Matthew 1:1-18
    What’s in a name? A look at genealogies… 1. Study Matthew 1:1-18 and Luke 3:23-38. What do you know about the authors? Matthew was financially well off and had his own house. He was educated and knew how to read and write. As a Jewish publican, a tax collector, fellow Jews despised him. Luke was a physician and companion of Paul. As a Gentile, he recorded as a historian and did careful research. 2. Make a table of the names of each genealogy. What do you notice? Matthew 1:1-18 Abraham-David David-Exile Exile-Jesus 15. David 36. Achim 1. Abraham 8. Amminadab 22. Uzziah 29. Jeconiah (Bathsheba) 37. Eliud 2. Isaac 9. Nahshon 23. Jotham 30. Shealtiel 16. Solomon 38. Eleazar 3. Jacob 10. Salmon (Rahab) 24. Ahaz 31. Zerubbabel 17. Rehoboam 39. Matthan 4. Judah (Tamar) 11. Boaz (Ruth) 25. Hezekiah 32. Abihud 18. Abijah 40. Jacob 5. Perez 12. Obed 26. Manasseh 33. Eliakim 19. Asa 41. Joseph 6. Hezron 13. Jesse 27. Amon 34. Azor 20. Jehoshaphat (Mary) 7. Ram 14. David (Bathsheba) 28. Josiah 35. Zadok 21. Joram 42. Jesus Observations of Matthew : Matthew's accounting of Israel's kings was for the Jewish audience who were interested in Jesus' royal-legal lineage as decreed by the Davidic covenants (2 Sam 7:8-13). This is perhaps emphasized as Matthew lists in a descending order: "...father of..." with the range of genealogy: Abraham-Jesus. By beginning with Abraham, Matthew stresses Jesus’ Jewish ancestry. The genealogical list is short, because Matthew does not list a number of generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Wife and Heterosexual Incestuous
    Judaica Ukrainica I (2012), 29–46 No Name WomaN: Noah’s Wife aNd heterosexual iNcestuous relatioNs iN GeNesis 9:18–29 corinne e. Blackmer Southern Connecticut State University [email protected] [Noah’s wife] was a nameless woman, and so at home among all those who were never found and never missed, who were uncommemorated, whose deaths were not remarked, nor their begettings1. I. The terse language and riddling innuendo of Gen 9:18–29, which narrates how Noah comes to curse Canaan, the son of Ham, has engaged the inter­ pretive energies of readers since the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud spe­ culated that Ham had castrated his father2. The language of this narrative, bristling with obscure phrases, loud hints of dreadful sexual transgression, and pious cover ups, has often left subsequent interpreters sensing that the story has meanings that the narrator declines to delineate. Indeed, the only thing that remains clear is that Gen 9:18–29 functions as an etiological myth to justify the permanent subordination of the tribes of Canaan. Canaan commits an un­ speakable sexual crime against Noah’s family that results in the subsequent physical displacement and sweeping rejection of the customs of the Canaanite peoples. Indeed, Israel’s secure possession of the Promised Land is predicated on repudiating the cultural institutions of the preceding Canaanites. Whatever the larger and associated issues, however, interpretive positions have gener­ 30 Corinne E. BLACKMER ally revolved around two broad questions. What was the nature of Ham’s of­ fense, such that when he “saw his father’s nakedness” and told his brothers, Shem and Japheth, it merited the terrible curse of permanent servitude Noah pronounced over him3? Second, what was the rationale for the punishment of Canaan and why, if Ham committed the crime, would his son Canaan suffer the penalty instead? Exegetical traditions have identified the deed for which Noah curses Ca­ naan either as voyeurism, castration, or homosexual paternal incest.
    [Show full text]