RTD Mobility Hub Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RTD Mobility Hub Guidelines RTD Mobility Hub Guidelines January 2019 Prepared by: CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................... 1 1.1 Document Purpose .......................... 3 2. What Is a Mobility Hub? .............. 4 3. Mobility Hub Typologies ............. 6 3.1 Existing Transit and Mobility ................... 6 3.2 Transportation Functions ..................... 9 3.3 Land Use Context .......................... 12 4. Mobility Hub Toolbox ................16 5. Appendix A ........................37 i 1. Introduction Over the last decade the transportation landscape has significantly Given these new pressures and opportunities, municipalities throughout evolved. Demographic shifts, increased urbanization, and changes the greater Denver region and Regional Transportation District in employment types and arrangements have put new demands (RTD) recognize the need to rethink how they deliver mobility. This on existing transportation and transit networks. At the same time, Guidebook, therefore, explores ways for RTD and agencies throughout breakthroughs in technology have ushered in new vehicles, new the region to cost-effectively improve and expand transit access, while services, and new ways to travel. Collectively, this is changing how also offering customers more ways to make more trips. people think about mobility. Why invest in integrated mobility? Many new mobility providers offer on-demand and shared-use options, bringing increased flexibility and convenience while also reducing the need for users to own a car. When successfully paired with transit, these new and emerging services have the potential to help build a transportation system that is more accessible, more sustainable, and more affordable. Studies1 have shown that when people use Household vehicle ownership by shared-mode experience shared-modes they are more likely to also use transit. This is because shared modes provide users with more trip-making options, making it easier for them to live car-free. For example, individuals can use transit for commute trips and local travel, bike share for first-last mile connections, and carshare for large shopping trips or weekend excursions, ultimately allowing them to forgo car ownership entirely. In fact, “supersharers” – those who regularly use multiple shared modes such as carsharing and bike sharing Source: Murphy, “Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit” – own half as many household cars as those who only use public transit. 1 Murphy, “Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit”; Masabi, ‘Key Factors Influencing Ridership in North America: The Emerging Urban Mobility Ecosystem.”; Parzen, “Shared-Use Mobility Reference Guide” 1 In addition to improving mobility and transit access, mobility hubs also offer municipalities an opportunity to work in tandem with RTD to improve community livability. The introduction of shared modes has put increased demands on streets and sidewalks, forcing cities and municipalities to rethink how these public spaces are managed. The expansion of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) style development has also put an increased focus on the use of public spaces and the transportation – land use connection. Mobility hubs will provide focal Why are Mobility Hubs important? “The design and configuration of stops and stations impacts Source: DenverUrbanism how everyone on the street interacts with the transit system” – NACTO Transit Street Design Guide To effectively improve transit access and customer mobility, RTD and Stops and stations are the “front door” of transit and can either local stakeholders must first consider some of the core questions attract or deter users based on how they are configured and surrounding mobility: designed. Well-designed stops with basic amenities such as • How do people know about their options? shelters and benches improve perceptions of transit service and 2 • How do they access them? help bolster ridership . Studies from the University of Minnesota and the University of Utah have found that stops with shelters, • How can they use them in conjunction with transit? benches, sidewalk connections, and real-time information grow • How can mobility be better integrated into the community? ridership more than stops without amenities and that those Addressing these questions is complex and requires a multi-pronged same amenities reduce perceived wait-time at stops by nearly 50 approach, which RTD has taken. The recent First-Last Mile Strategic Plan percent3. As the first place most people interact with the transit has defined strategies and policies to improve multi-modal connections system, stops undoubtedly play a crucial role in attracting and to RTD services. These Guidelines complement that effort by looking retaining riders. at what RTD and local partners can do at transit stops and stations to improve mobility and transit access by focusing on the physical As new mobility options continue to spread across the Metro and virtual infrastructure elements that are needed to support multi- Denver area, stops will naturally evolve from transit access points modal and intermodal trip making. Options such as dedicated space to mobility access points. Proactively planning for and guiding this for shared-mobility, enhanced pedestrian connections, integrated trip planning, and local placemaking are all strategies that will allow RTD transition will allow both RTD and its municipal partners to ensure and municipalities to guide the transition of stops and stations to more stops remain attractive useful places and that the transportation comprehensive mobility hubs, ultimately making transit more attractive system remains accessible and equitable for all. to more people. 2 Buchanan et al, “From Sorry to Superb: Everything You Need to Know about Great Bus Stops” 3 Fan et al, “Perception of Waiting Time at Transit Stops and Stations”; Kim et al, “Impacts of Bus Stop Improvements” 2 points as cities around the region work to optimize and manage The Guidelines consist of four main sections: public space in a way that improves the public realm and maximizes 1. Introduction – Provides an overview and document purpose mobility and access for all users. Using mobility hubs to strengthen the connection between mobility, people, and places will allow RTD and 2. What is a Mobility Hub? – Defines mobility hubs and their goals municipalities to collectively maximize the shared value of transit and and objectives the public experience. 3. What are the types of Mobility Hubs? – Establishes mobility hub typologies 1.1 Document Purpose 4. Mobility Hub Toolbox– Provides a toolbox of hub components RTD and municipalities throughout the Metro Denver area have been and guidance on the use of each treatment proactively addressing the evolving transportation landscape by While these Guidelines present strategies and actionable steps, it is adopting principles and goals that support collaboration, strategic important to note that success, above all, will hinge on partnerships, partnerships, placemaking, growth and the integration of new modes. local engagement, and a shared vision for the future. Given the Numerous studies have been done or are currently underway which complexity of urban mobility, a collaborative approach to planning for support the development of a sustainable multi-modal transportation and implementing integrated access will be fundamental to ensuring network, embrace innovative technologies, and explore strategic the transportation system continues to work for people of all ages, mobility partnerships. incomes, and mobility needs. Lastly, this document represents a snapshot in time. The mobility Some examples of recent studies include the Mobility Choice environment is dynamic and continues to rapidly evolve. RTD Service Blueprint Plan (RTD), the North Boulder Mobility Hub project Development anticipates updating these Guidelines as new information, modes, best practices, and opportunities emerge. (City of Boulder, RTD, Boulder County and CDOT), the First and Last Mile Strategic Plan (RTD), Mobility Action Plan (City of Denver), and Denveright (City and County of Denver). These Mobility Hub Guidelines offer a next step for the region by providing different strategies and tools RTD, city and county leaders, and local stakeholders can use as they consider mobility access and how and where alternative mobility can integrate with the existing public transportation system. The Guidelines focus on the factors that contribute to successful mobility hubs by describing the functions, amenities, infrastructure, and services that make it easier for people to access transit and other transportation options. They consider both the physical elements related to access (sidewalks, shared-mode parking, bicycle infrastructure, etc) and the elements that facilitate access (mixed- use environments, real-time information, integrated trip-planning, etc), acknowledging the importance of both. 3 2. What Is a Mobility Hub? Mobility hubs are more than just transit stops. They are community by providing multimodal services and activities at or around transit focal points that seamlessly integrate various transportation modes, stations. This goal can be achieved by focusing on two objectives: provide supportive multimodal infrastructure, and utilize placemaking transit and mobility access and placemaking4. These objectives can be strategies to create activity centers that maximize first–mile last-mile achieved by using several strategies, outlined below, which serve to connections and increase
Recommended publications
  • Designated Urban Centers
    Designated Urban Centers Within 1/4 Mile of Served by Transit Served by Transit Urban Center Name Community Rapid Transit with 15 Min. with 30 Min. System Station Headways or Less Headways or Less Candelas ArvadaNoNoNo Olde Town/New Town Arvada Yes No Yes Ralston Fields Arvada Yes No Yes 1st Avenue Center Aurora No Yes Yes 56th Avenue Aurora No No No Airport Gateway Aurora Yes No Yes Aurora City Center Aurora Yes Yes Yes Buckingham Center Aurora No Yes Yes Colfax Avenue Aurora No Yes Yes E‐470 / I‐70 Aurora No No No Fitzsimons Aurora Yes Yes Yes Hampden Town Center Aurora Yes No No I‐225/Parker Road Aurora Yes Yes Yes Iliff Avenue Center Aurora No Yes Yes Jewell Avenue Aurora No No No Smoky Hill Aurora No No No 28th/30th Streets (BVRC) Boulder Yes Yes Yes Downtown Boulder Boulder No Yes Yes Gunbarrel Activity Center Boulder No No Yes University Hill Boulder No Yes Yes Adams Crossing Activity Center Brighton No No No Bromley Park Activity Center Brighton No No Yes Downtown Brighton Activity Ctr Brighton No No Yes Prairie Center Activity Center Brighton No No No 1‐25 & SH 7 Activity Center Broomfield No No Yes Interlocken Loopp Activityy Center Broomfield Yes Yes Yes Original Broomfield TODBroomfieldNoNoNo Urban Transit Village Broomfield Yes Yes Yes 10th & Osage Station Denver Yes No Yes 29th Ave. Town Center Denver No Yes Yes 38th and Blake TOD Denver Yes No Yes 41st and Fox TOD Denver Yes No Yes 62nd and Pena TODDenverNoNoNo Alameda Station Denver Yes Yes Yes Bear Valley Denver No Yes Yes Bellview Station Denver Yes No Yes Broadway Station
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019 Proposed Service Changes
    May 2019 Proposed Service Changes BUS Route 0 – South Broadway Running time analysis resulting in schedule adjustments. Route 1 – 1st Avenue Move east terminal from Birch/Virginia to Virginia/Cherry, immediately behind King Soopers at Leetsdale/Cherry for operator restroom and customer convenience. Route 15 – East Colfax This proposal is an effort to relieve passenger overloads east of Monaco to VA Hospital by adding selected trips between 9:00am and 1:00pm. Move short turn recovery location from Oneida/Colfax to Leyden/Colfax, for operator restroom access. Close to Walgreens, McDonalds, 7-11. Add weekday bus for recovery and on-time performance. 16/16L – West Colfax Running time analyses on weekend services. Route 33 – Platte Valley Due to low ridership performance, it proposed that this route service be discontinued. Current ridership performance stands at 10.3 passenger per hour, which falls below the Urban Local ridership standard. This proposal would impact approximately 55 weekday passengers. Alternative service to the Route 33 can be found in using combinations of Central and West Light Rail corridors, Routes 4, 9, 30 and 30Limited. Route 36L – Fort Logan Limited Running time analysis, for operator recovery and on-time performance. No cost impacts are anticipated. Route 44 – 44th Avenue Reroute eastbound buses via Larimer Street instead of Lawrence, between Broadway and Downing. This change consolidates service onto the historic transit corridor, instead of being split between two streets. Bus stop improvement along northbound Larimer are currently underway in support of this reroute. No cost impacts are anticipated. Route 51 – Sheridan Boulevard This proposal would, formalize the current 4-block route detour in Englewood, which was put into effect due to the City having converted a part of Elati Street into a one-way operation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan
    Denver Regional Council of Governments 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan Appendix 1 Denver Region Multimodal Corridor Visions Adopted December 19, 2007 Preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, and Federal Highway Administration. Disclaimer: The data in this report are compiled from multiple sources and are intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG assumes no responsibility or legal liability for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in this report. ii Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 A. Overview of Appendix.................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Implementation Priorities.............................................................................................................................. 1 2. COMMON STRATEGIES FOR ALL CORRIDOR VISIONS IN DRCOG REGION ............................. 5 A. Overall .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Transit Facilities and Services ...................................................................................................................... 5 C. Travel Demand Management.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January 2014 Service Changes
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT To: Phillip A. Washington, General Manager Date: October 10, 2013 From: Bruce Abel, Assistant General Manager GM Date: October 8, 2013 Board Meeting Date: October 15, 2013 Subject: January 2014 Service Changes RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended by the Operations/Customer Services Committee that the Board of Directors approve the January 2014 Service Change package as revised and summarized in Attachment A resulting in an annualized cost increase of approximately $635,500 and, further, to authorize the General Manager or his designee to execute contract amendments as necessary for private operators whose service is impacted by these changes. DISCUSSION To meet the diverse travel needs of the citizens of the District and maintain a high-performance, sustainable transit system, RTD has developed a networked family of services for which the different classes of service have different expectations of performance. We will continue adjusting services in response to changes in ridership and operational performance of the transit system as a whole while also continuing to review the impacts of the implementation of the West Corridor Light Rail Service and the associated bus service changes. Routine service changes not associated with or included in the West Corridor Service Plan are necessary to maintain system on-time performance and provide the appropriate level of service according to customer demand while we will also need to monitor customer response to the implementation of West Corridor bus and rail service and
    [Show full text]
  • RTD I-225 Rail Line Montview Alignment Change
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE RTD Board Approves Moving Planned I-225 Rail Station from Montview to Fitzsimons Parkway CU Officials Commit to Shuttle Service from Fitzsimons Station to Anschutz Medical Campus DENVER, June 25, 2013—The Regional Transportation District (RTD) Board of Directors has approved a request from the University of Colorado (CU) Anschutz Medical Campus to relocate the planned Montview Station on the I-225 Rail Line to a new location at Fitzsimons Parkway. CU officials requested the station be moved due to concerns for adequate mitigation of electromagnetic interference (EMI) and vibration near sensitive research equipment at current and future medical buildings. This decision by the Board of Directors will allow the I-225 project team to identify environmental impacts and propose mitigation before moving forward with design and construction. “We will continue to collaborate with our partners to ensure that our project meets the needs of the greater community,” said RTD General Manager Phil Washington. “We will develop a solution that keeps the project moving forward while staying on budget.” During the 2007 - 2009 environmental and early design process, RTD and CU evaluated options for mitigating EMI and vibration from the train, but found that previous measures identified might not be sufficient for future technologies. Additional methods of mitigation were considered but found to be too costly. The project team aims to have a new alignment and station site determined, with design underway, by the end of the year. The I-225 Rail Line is a 10.5-mile light rail extension that will travel through the City of Aurora and make key connections to the Anschutz Medical Campus and the future VA Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Broncosride Pickup Schedule for December 22, 2019
    BroncosRide and Light Rail Service page 1 of 2 BroncosRide Schedule for: Sunday, December 22, 2019 Route: Park-n-Ride / Stop / Station Times are approximate Post game bus location** BR26: Dry Creek & University 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 12:55 PM Row 22 Arapahoe High School BR24: Alameda Havana 12:25 PM 12:40 PM 12:55 PM Row 21 BR10: Boulder High School 11:35 AM 11:55 AM 12:15 PM Row15-16 Arapahoe & 17th BR32: El Rancho 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:35 PM Row 4 BR32: Evergreen 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:20 PM Row 4 BR38: Federal Shuttle: Lincoln HS (Hazel Ct & Iliff) and bus stops on Federal Blvd 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5 - 10 minutes until 1:50 PM Row 28 between Evans and 8th Ave BR20: Longmont Park-n-Ride 11:30 AM 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:30 PM Rows 17-18 815 South Main Street BR44: Nine Mile (Ga te F) 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:00 PM Rows 23-24 BR8: Olde Town Arvada Discontinued Discontinued: Ride G-Line to DUS and Transfer to C, E or W-Lines to Broncos Stadium BR48: Parker 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM Row 19 BR48: Pinery 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:05 PM 12:20 PM Row 19 BR56: South High School 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:35 PM 12:50 PM Row 26 Louisiana & Gilpin BR4: Thornton (Gate C) 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:35 PM Rows 9-12 BR10: US 36 & Broomfield Station (Gate 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:55 AM 12:05 PM 12:15 PM 12:25 PM 12:45 PM Rows 15-16 K) BR10: US 36 & McCaslin Stn (Gate A) 11:45
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Metropolitan Centers: Evaluating Local Implementation of Regional Plans and Policies NITCN-RR-761 March 2017 NITC is a U.S. Department of Transportation national university transportation center. METROPOLITAN CENTERS: EVALUATING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL PLANS AND POLICIES Final Report NITCN-RR-761 by Richard D. Margerum Rebecca Lewis Keith Bartholomew Robert G. Parker Stephen Dobrinich University of Oregon University of Utah for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 March 2017 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITCN-RR-761 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Metropolitan Centers: March 2017 Evaluating local implementation of regional plans and policies 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Richard D. Margerum Rebecca Lewis Keith Bartholomew Robert G. Parker Stephen Dobrinich 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of PPPM, University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1209 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The Denver and Salt Lake City Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) have embarked upon regional visioning strategies that promote development around higher density, mixed use centers with current or future access to transit. This study examines the programs and policies in the Salt Lake City and Denver regions to examine regional vision influence on local planning and the opportunities and constraints facing centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fys1617 TDM Application
    FY 2016 and 2017 DRCOG TDM Pool Application Form A. GENERAL INFORMATION Agency Legal Name City of Aurora Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway City/State/Zip Code Aurora, CO 80012 Website www.auroragov.org Identify and provide contact information for: Project manager for proposed activity(ies) Person authorized to enter into contracts Only if different from authorized person (e.g., consultant) Name Kevin Wegener Name Huiliang Liu Title City Engineer Title Principal Transportation Planner Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway, Public Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway Works Department City, State, ZIP Aurora, CO 80012 City, State, ZIP Aurora, CO 80012 Phone 303-739-7300 Phone 303-739-7265 Email [email protected] Email [email protected] 1. Project Title Aurora and East Line Bike-n-Ride Storage Facilities 2. Primary Project Type (select one) Indicate which project type is your primary focus and majority of budget (>50%): Non-infrastructure (marketing, outreach, transit passes, etc.) Infrastructure (permanently installed, vehicles, bicycle parking, etc.) Applicant is committed to have a maintenance pl an in place for the proposed infrastructure. 3. Project Description (concise abstract limited to 500 characters) The City of Aurora and Northeast Transportation Conections (NETC) will jointly develop a secure bike-n-Ride storage system for the soon to be opened East and Aurora Rail lines to encourage alternative modes of travel in Aurora and Northeast Denver. Specifically, secure bike shelters will be installed at Iliff, Peoria and Central Park Stations initially and potentially could be expanded to other stations in the future. A marketing and public outreach component will also be included.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview
    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and FasTracks Overview RTD oversees a 47-mile rail transit system that services 46 stations on five corridors including: • The 5.3-mile Central Corridor and 1.8-mile Central Platte Valley (CPV) Spur in central Denver • The 8.7-mile Southwest Line to Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton • The 19.2-mile Southeast Line to Lone Tree and Aurora • The 12.1-mile West Line to Lakewood and Golden The FasTracks program, approved by district voters in a 2004 ballot initiative will: • add 122 miles of rail service • 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • approximately 60 new stations along six new corridors • extend three existing light rail lines image courtesy Gensler Grand Opening / image courtesy RTD Construction cranes dominated the skyline in RTD and TOD STAMPs Underway STAMPs Kicking Off 2013, as the result of an apartment boom in in 2014 the metro area. Development in 2013 centered Transit-oriented development is typically on the hub of the FasTracks program: Denver higher density and incorporates a mixture C-470/Lucent Station I-25/Broadway Station Area Master Plan Area Master Plan Union Station which is scheduled to open in of different uses that generate transit rider- spring 2014. Significant development has also ship. Multiple TODs contribute to creating 104th Ave. Station TOD Fitzsimons Parkway occurred around other existing and future transit-oriented communities where people Master Planning Study Station Area Master Plan stations as construction of FasTracks corridors can live, work, reduce transportation costs, continues at a rapid pace. and improve overall health through increased 88th Avenue Station Civic Center Station muli-modal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • RTD Director Map District A
    Globeville Cole Clayton Northeast Park Hill W 32ND AVE E MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD E MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD UV35 West Highland 25 30th / Downing Station ¨¦§ 30TH AV Highland NDOWNING ST DELGANY ST BLAKE ST I E 29TH AVE W 29TH AVE WALNUT ST Whittier N SPEER BLVD LARIMER ST CENTRAL ST 28TH ST 0 0.3 0.6 LAWRENCEARAPAHOE ST ST 30th - Downing Station North Park Hill Stapleton N CLAY ST NCLAY Five Points CHAMPA ST Skyland Miles 22ND ST 29th St - Welton Station E 26TH AVE Union Station E 26TH AVE E 26TH AVENUE PKWY STOUT ST 18TH ST 27th St - Welton Station 25TH AV MARKET ST E 24TH AVE WATER ST Union Station 20TH ST E 24TH AVE RTD Director SloanW 23RD Lake AVE 19TH ST 25th St - Welton Station E 23RD AVE Jefferson Park NSYRACUSE ST Districts 15TH ST CALIFORNIAWELTON ST ST NFRANKLIN ST TREMONT PL MONTVIEW BD E 20TH AVE E MONTVIEW BLVD YOSEMITEN ST Pepsi Center - Elitch Gardens Station CURTIS ST17TH ST MOLINEST 20th St - Welton Station ST DAYTON Auraria E 19TH AVE 13TH ST City Park South Park Hill E 18TH AVE NSTEELE ST INVESCO Field at Mile High Station North Capitol Hill E 17TH AVE 17TH AV CBD E 17TH AVENUE PKWY 14TH ST E 17TH AVE City Park West 13TH ST E 16TH AVE Legend West Colfax AURARIA PKWY East Colfax NBROADWAY 40 YOSEMITEST LightRail Stations Auraria West Station ¤£40 ¤£40 ¤£ X" NJOSEPHINE ST NMONACO STREET PKWY E 14TH AVE NOSAGE ST N YORKN ST W 14TH AVE ST PEORIA NLOGAN ST ParkNRides HAVANA ST HAVANA Sun Valley W 13TH AVE E 13TH AVE NQUEBEC ST Cheesman Park NDOWNING ST NLINCOLN ST NSTEELE ST COUNTIES Capitol Hill DecaturNDECATUR ST - Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit by 2050
    Go Long: Regional Transit by 2050 GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life Go Long: Regional Transit by 2050 Mr. Bill Thunberg, Lake Norman Transportation Commission Ms. Marla Lien, General Counsel, Denver Regional Transit District GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life Charlotte Region Metropolitan Transit Commission 2030 Vision GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life CONNECT Our Future’s Publicly-Driven “2050 Regional Growth Concept” Including Transit GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life CONNECT’s Public Input on Regional Transit in 2050 • “Too many people for our roads. Move us further toward transit.” • Success headline: “New mass transit regionally, roads that work for all uses…” • “More transit--would like high speed rail-go to Rock Hill (Light Rail)” • “At some point I may no longer be able or want to drive. I cannot conceive of not being able to go places. This is my life - seeing what the city/county has to offer culturally, spiritually, etc. There must be a more efficient way to get there for both young and older people. Mass transit/car sharing/pooling must become a way of life for all in the future.” GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life Denver’s Regional Transit District A National Leader Tells All… Marla Lien, General Counsel GROWING Jobs and Our Economy | CONTROLLING Cost of Government | IMPROVING Quality of Life Regional Transportation District • Created in 1969 • Eight-county service area • Service area: 2,340 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Fastracks Baseline Report to DRCOG and RTP Submittal
    2014 FasTracks Baseline Report to DRCOG and RTP Submittal August 2014 2014 FasTracks Baseline Report to DRCOG and RTP Submittal Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 11 1.0 Project Definition: Scope and Costs ......................................................... 11 1.1 Current Plan and Costs ....................................................................................... 14 1.2 2014 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) ............................................................. 20 1.2.1 Efforts Towards Completion of FasTracks .................................................. 21 1.2.1.1 RAM/FISA .............................................................................................. 21 1.2.1.2 Southeast Rail Extention New Starts...................................................... 22 1.2.1.3 Public-Private Partnerships .................................................................... 23 1.2.1.4 Northwest Area Mobility Study ............................................................... 25 1.3 Status of FasTracks Lines ................................................................................... 28 1.3.1 Central Rail Extension ................................................................................ 28 1.3.2 Denver Union Station ................................................................................. 30
    [Show full text]