DOCSLIB.ORG

Note on Transliteration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Note on Transliteration Note on Transliteration There are a number of transliteration systems for Ottoman Turkish and modern Greek, the two languages that predominate here, as well as for Bulgarian and Ro- manian, terms and names from which also appear from time to time in this book. I have tried to stick with a basic modern Turkish rendering of Ottoman Turkish words and a simplified modern Greek transliteration style whenever possible for termsandphrases.Asfaraspropernames,phanariotsareparticularlyhardtostan- dardize, behaving as linguistic chameleons as much as political ones (e.g., the Soutso/ Soutzo/Suçu/Drakozade/Souzzo family). For the better-known families, I have opted for the most commonly used variant of their name, and for the lesser-known clans, I have tended toward the modern Turkish phonetic rendition whenever pos- sible. For Stephanos Vogorides, I have chosen the Greek variant (rather than Stoiko Stoikov, his original name, the Bulgarian variant of his adult name Stefan Bogoridi, or the Turkish Istefanaki Bey), and I have done so for Kostaki (Constantine) Musu- rus (rather than Kostaki Paşa, Musurus Paşa, or Constantine Mousouros) as well. For nonphanariots, I have opted for the modern Turkish variant of names (Mehmet Ali rather than the Arabic variant, Muhammad Ali, for instance). Finally, when I provide multiple variants for a term, T. signifies Turkish; G., Greek; B., Bulgarian; R., Romanian; and Sl., Slavic. Christians with Greek names were often referred to in Turkish by their Greek diminutive form. Someone named Constantine (Konstantinos) in Greek, for in- stance, would be called Kostaki, the diminutive Greek form, adapted into Turkish. This book abounds with characters such as Manolaki (Emmanuel → Manolis → Manolaki) Efendi, Istefanaki (Stephanos → Stefanaki → Istefanaki) Bey, and Yanaki (Ioannis → Yanni → Yanaki). Not wanting to lose this pattern of linguistic/cultural xi xii Note on Transliteration transmission and adaptation and also not wanting to confuse the reader, I have in- cluded the diminutive nicknames when relevant but placed the fuller name in brack- ets after the first mention of that name. ForplacenamesIhavetriedtostaywiththeTurkishvariant,whichiswhyIre- fertotheOttomancapitalasİstanbulratherthanConstantinople,despitethefact that in the nineteenth century it was commonly known in English as Constantinople. For other places, which lie outside of Turkey today, I have tried to provide the stan- dard national variant (Ioannina in Greece) but have provided the Turkish variant (Yanya) in brackets. Since I have opted for the use of Turkish diacritics, I provide below a guide to Turkish pronunciation: a like o in oz e like a in hay i or İ like ee in meet ı or I like u in muddle o like ow in low ö or Ö like the German ö u like oo in tool ü or Ü like the French u ç or Ç like ch in chimney ğ soft “g,” hardly pronounced ş or Ş like sh in shed RUSSIA to Austria Pruth to Russia R. B to Great Britain E R. Independent states S r S e A t Approximate extent of Ottoman Empire in 1913 HUNGARY s Jassy R ie A Dn B I MOLDAVIA A Sea of D TRANSYLVANIA Azov anu b ROMANIA e CRIMEA BOSNIA R. WALLACHIA CIRCASSIA Bucharest C AUC Ruse (Rusçuk) ASU S M TN BLACK SEA S. ADRIATIC Sofia BULGARIA SEA A EASTERN RUMELIA L B Bosphorus A N Kavala Edirne I A Trabzon Salonika Istanbul/Constantinople Sea of Bursa Marmara ARMENIA Lemnos GREECE AEGEAN IONIAN Kütahya SEA SEA Lesbos Chios Izmir TURKEY/ANATOLIA Athens T Ephesus ig MOREA Samos r is R Navarino . PERSIA Euph rat es R Cyprus . Crete Dodecanese Islands Baghdad Beirut MEDITERRANEAN SEA Jerusalem Alexandria Cairo Map 1. Ottoman Empire, 1683–1913. Habsburg Empire Russian Empire Hotin Ottoman Empire Principality of Transylvania D Moldavia n RUSSIAN ie Wallachia s te EMPIRE r BUCOVINA R i v e BESSARABIA r P ru th HABSBURG R iv EMPIRE e Jassy r Chisinau Cluj MOLDAVIA PRINCIPALITY OF TRANSYLVANIA Temesvar Braçovs Galatsi BANAT Ibrail Babadag Ploiesti be Rive Danu r WALLACHIA Bucharest Craiova DOBRUJA Calarasi Costanza Vidin Silistre Kalafat Yergögu Turtukaya (Tutrakan) BLACK Rusçuk O E SEA T R T O I M A N E M P Map 2. Moldavia and Wallachia, 1774–1812. Habsburg Empire Russian Empire Hotin Ottoman Empire Principality of Transylvania D Moldavia n RUSSIAN ie Wallachia s te EMPIRE Serbia (under Ottoman suzerainty) r BUCOVINA R i v e BESSARABIA r P HABSBURG ru th EMPIRE R iv e Jassy r Chisinau Cluj MOLDAVIA PRINCIPALITY OF TRANSYLVANIA Cetatea Alba Temesvar Braçovs Galatsi BANAT Ibrail Buzau Babadag Ploiestiçs Belgrade be Rive Danu r WALLACHIA DOBRUJA Bucharest Craiova Calarasiç Costanza Vidin Silistre SERBIA Kalafat Yergögu Turtukaya (Tutrakan) BLACK SEA Rusçuk E O R T I T O P M A N E M Map 3. Moldavia and Wallachia, 1812–1829. Habsburg Empire Russian Empire Hotin Ottoman Empire Principality of Transylvania D n Moldavia ie s RUSSIAN Wallachia te r EMPIRE BUCOVINA R i v e r BESSARABIA P HABSBURG ru th EMPIRE R iv e Jassy r Chisinau Cluj MOLDAVIA PRINCIPALITY OF TRANSYLVANIA Temesvar Braçovs Galatsi BANAT Ibrail be Rive Danu r WALLACHIA Bucharest DOBRUJA Craiova Costanza Yergögu Silistre BLACK Turtukaya (Tutrakan) SEA O E T T R O M I A N E M P Map 4. Moldavia and Wallachia, 1829..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vladimir Paounovsky
    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Bulgarian Nationalism and Russia's Influence Upon It
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2014 The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it. Lin Wenshuang University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Wenshuang, Lin, "The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1548. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1548 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Lin Wenshuang All Rights Reserved THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Approved on April 1, 2014 By the following Dissertation Committee __________________________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Russian Policy in the Balkans, 1878-1914
    1 Russian Policy in the Balkans, 1878-1914 At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, the Balkans were the most turbulent region in Europe. On the one hand were the Balkan peoples with their aims of creating their own national states with the broadest borders possible, and on the other, the ambitions of the Great Powers to gain spheres of influence in the European territories of the Ottoman Empire. This led to a continually strained and unstable situation. 1.1 Between the Two Wars: 1856-1877 The Crimean War proved to be the turning point in the relations between Russia and the Near East. After this first serious defeat of the Russian army in a war with the Ottoman Empire, Christians of the Near East and the Balkans looked more and more towards Europe. The image of Russia as the liberator of the Orthodox inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire faded and the authority of the Russian tsar was to a great extent lost. Russian diplomacy after 1856 focused totally on the restoration of Russia’s former authority. Of great significance in this process were the activities of Count N. P. Ignatiev, the ambassa- dor to Constantinople from 1864 to 1877.11 His idea of creating ‘Greater Bulgaria’, a large south-Slavonic state in the Balkans, as a base for Russian interests and further penetra- tion towards the Straits, received the support of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and coincided with the intentions of Tsar Alexander II. In 1870, the Russian government declared that it would no longer comply with the restrictions of the Paris Treaty of 1856.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Britain and the Establishment of the Province of Eastern Rumelia
    VAKANÜVİS- Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi/ International Journal of Historical Researches, Yıl/Vol. 3, Prof. Dr. Azmi Özcan Öğrencileri Özel Sayısı/ Special Issue in Honour of Prof. Dr. Azmi Özcan By His Students ISSN: 2149-9535 Russia, Britain and the Establishment of the Province of Eastern Rumelia Nadezhda Vasileva Vasileva1 Abstract The Treaty of San Stefano signed immediately after Ottoman-Russian war 1877- 1878 creating “Great Bulgaria” and thus endangered the “Balance of Power” in Europe disturbed by the Great Eastern Crisis 1875-1878 arose in the Balkan Peninsula. The Treaty was considered as one-sided attempt to solve the Eastern Question by Britain and Austro-Hungary. So they insisted a revision of the Treaty. Thus the Great Power met in Berlin with the aim to be re-established the order in the Balkans providing each of the Great Powers with proportioned influence in the region. At the Congress of Berlin the large Bulgarian state was divided into three parts and thus was created the province of Eastern Rumelia remaining the authority of the Sultan. The establishment of autonomous province was decided during а bilateral negotiations between Britain and Russian at the time of the diplomatic preparation of the Congress. The growing rivalry between the two Great Powers regarding the Ottoman Empire’s territories in the second half of the 19 century required compromises and Eastern Rumelia was one of them. The aim of this paper is to examine the struggle between Russia and Britain during the organization of the province of Eastern Rumelia at the Balkans. The research focus on the British and Russian policy executed during the time of elaboration of Organic Law and organization of the administrative institutions of the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Regions, Minorities and European Policies: a State of the Art Report on Muslim Minorities (Turks and Pomaks) in Central South Planning Region (Bulgaria)
    Regions, minorities and European policies: A state of the art report on Muslim Minorities (Turks and Pomaks) In Central South Planning Region (Bulgaria) Galina Lozanova, Bozhidar Alexiev, Georgeta Nazarska, Evgenia Troeva- Grigorova and Iva Kyurkchieva International Centre for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations (IMIR) Project report (D1 and D2) prepared for the EUROREG project funded by the European Commission Research DG, Key Action Improving the Socio- Economic Knowledge Base (contract no. CIT2-CT-2003-506019) Contact details: Dr. Galina Lozanova, Senior Research Fellow, email: [email protected], Dr. Bozhidar Alexiev, email: [email protected]; Dr. Georgeta Nazarska, email: [email protected]; Dr. Evgenia Troeva-Grigorova, email: [email protected]; and Iva Kyurkchieva, email: [email protected]. Address: International Centre for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations (IMIR), 55, Antim I St., Sofia 1303, Bulgaria, Tel: +359-2-323112; Fax: +359-2-320015; e-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Presentation of the case of Turks and Muslim Bulgarians in the South Central Region (SCR) of Bulgaria 5 2.1. Brief historical excursus on the Bulgarian state policies towards Muslim minorities 5 2.2. Socio-economic conditions in the South Central Region 8 2.3. Size and types of the EU funds channeled to the South Central Region 10 2.4. Socio-economic status of the minority and the majority 11 2.5. Political-administrative institutions and territorial structures in the country and in the South Central Region 12 2.6. Important reforms and changes in relation to the implementation of EU structural policy 13 2.7.Conclusion 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria About This Guide
    Expeditionary Culture Field Guide Varna Veliko Tarnovo Sofia Plovdiv Bulgaria About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo: Souvenir vendor in the old part of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, courtesy of CultureGrams, ProQuest). The guide consists of 2 parts: ECFG Part 1 “Culture General” provides the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment with a focus on Eastern Europe. Bulgaria Part 2 “Culture Specific” describes unique cultural features of Bulgarian society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment training (Photo: USAF and Bulgarian senior NCOs discuss enlisted force development concerns). For further information, visit the Air Force Culture and Language Center (AFCLC) website at http://culture.af.mil/ or contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected]. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA: HISTORY and POSTCOI^Munist TRANSITION
    BULGARIA: HISTORY AND POSTCOI^MUNiST TRANSITION A Master’s Thesis by ADEMIZGO Department of International Relations Bltkent University Ankara July 2005 To My Wife, Gül BULGARIA: fflSTORY AND POSTCOMMUNIST TRANSITION The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by ADEM iZGU In Partial Fulfilment o f the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS m THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BlLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA July 2005 ь е (Л . і9Ц Д О 5 Ь 092823 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Asst. Prof Nur Bilge Criss Thesis Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Asst. Prof Hasan Unal Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in qualitTr^s a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Asst. Prof Emef0sman?avusoglu Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT BULGARIA: fflSTORY AND POSTCOMMUNIST TRANSITION izgii, Adem M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss July 2005 This thesis analyses establishment and transition of Bulgaria in chronological order, starting from the emergence of an independent Bulgarian kingdom in the Balkans to modem Bulgaria, mainly elabor^ing changes in the social-political, economic and foreign policy dimensions.
    [Show full text]