Geohydrology and Water Quality of the Unconsolidated Deposits in Erie County, Pennsylvania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geohydrology and Water Quality of the Unconsolidated Deposits in Erie County, Pennsylvania Geohydrology and Water Quality of the Unconsolidated Deposits in Erie County, Pennsylvania by Theodore F. Buckwalter, Curtis L. Schreffler, and Richard E. Gleichsner U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4165 Prepared in cooperation with the ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 840 Market Street Open-File Reports Section Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract....................................................................^ 1 Introduction..................................................................................................^ 2 Purpose and scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Well-numbering system.............................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Description of study area...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Physiography and drainage......................................................................................................................................... 2 Population and water use............................................................................................................................................ 4 Previous studies........................................................................................................................................................... 4 General.............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Ground-water contamination of specific sites................................................................................................... 4 Geologic setting............................................................................................................_ 7 Bedrock.......................................................................................................^ 7 Hydrologic setting.............................................................................................................^ 7 Hydrologic cycle......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Precipitation................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Streamflow.................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Water budgets.............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Geohydrology............................................................._ 18 Ground-water flow...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Recent alluvium................................................................................................................................................ 21 Pleistocene deposits.......................................................................................................................................... 21 Till....................................................................................................................................... 21 Outwash.................................................................................................................................................. 21 Beach deposits......................................................................................................................................... 23 Fractured bedrock............................................................................................................................................. 23 Water-level fluctuations............................................................................................................................................... 24 Ground-water availability........................................................................................................................................... 24 Hydraulic properties of Pleistocene deposits.............................................................................................................. 28 Methods..................................................................................................._^ 32 Theis-type-curve method........................................................................................................................ 32 Cooper-Jacob straight-line method......................................................................................................... 32 Theis recovery method............................................................................................................................ 33 Test results......................................................................................................................................................... 33 McKean Township (site 1)...................................................................................................................... 33 Millcreek Township (site 2).................................................................................................................... 38 Presque Isle (site 3)................................................................................................................................. 49 North East Township (site 4)................................................................................................................... 49 Water quality ........................................................ 50 Base flow..................................................................................................................................................................... 50 Ground water............................................................................................................................................................... 77 Inorganic constituents....................................................................................................................................... 77 Major constituents................................................................................................................................... 77 Trace constituents.................................................................................................................................... 77 Organic constituents.......................................................................................................................................... 83 Herbicides and pesticides........................................................................................................................ 83 Tile drains...................................................................................................................................... 83 Supply wells.................................................................................................................................. 86 Volatile organic compounds.................................................................................................................... 86 Bacteria............................................................................................................................................................. 86 CONTENDS III Summary............................................................................................................................................................................... 86 References cited .................................................................. 87 Glossary................................................................................................................................................................................ 91 Appendix 1. Geologic sections showing depth to bedrock at sections J-J', P-P, R-R', S-S1, T-T, U-U', V-V, and W-W, Erie County, Pennsylvania.................................................................................................................................. 93 Appendix 2. Record of wells, Erie County, Pennsylvania................................................................................................... 99 FIGURES 1-4. Maps showing: 1. Physiographic divisions of Erie County, Pennsylvania.............................................................................. 3 2. Townships and major cities of Erie County, Pennsylvania,
Recommended publications
  • Zebra Mussels Invade Conneaut Lake by Deborah Weisberg
    photo-U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and S. Fish photo-U. by Deborah Weisberg While Conneaut Lake, Pennsylvania’s largest natural lake, to any hard surface or structure including the shells of draws thousands of anglers and boaters each year, it’s now other mussels. If enough of them encrust the entire native hosting unwanted residents, too. mussel, it won’t be able to open, and it will eventually die.” Zebra mussels, an exotic invader first spotted in the “Once they establish and multiply, they are almost Great Lakes in the mid-1980s, have been found in the impossible to eliminate, particularly in a natural fishery,” 925-acre glacial lake and its outflow in Crawford County, said Woomer. “If it got dire, you could drain a reservoir, at raising new environmental concerns. least theoretically. But, you can’t drain a natural lake. And, “People have called me astounded that they are seeing chemicals aren’t an option anywhere, because you would zebra mussels everywhere in Conneaut Lake this year. wind up harming other aquatic animals.” Whereas last year, they saw just three,” said Tim Wilson, Zebra mussels are a new headache for the Conneaut Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission (PFBC) fisheries Lake Aquatic Management Association (CLAMA), which biologist. “One of our seasonal employees was fishing the already has its hands full trying to control vegetation in outflow and saw them everywhere, too.” a way that satisfies all users of the lake. Anglers come for “It shows you how quickly they can proliferate and why the trophy bass, northern pike and panfish while boaters we put so much effort into public education.” are drawn to the lack of horsepower restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    WATER RESOURCES Major Tributaries The French Creek watershed has ten major tributaries whose sub-basins cover at least 50 square miles (Figure 3). In addition, those major sub-basins can be broken down further into the Pennsylvania State Water Plan designated small watersheds (Figure 13). The PA portion of the main stem of French Creek is classified as a warm water fishery (WWF) by the PA Department of Environmental Protection’s Water Quality Standards (PA Title 25, Chapter 93). West Branch of French Creek The West Branch of French Creek originates in Chautauqua County, New York and flows southwest into Erie County, Pennsylvania before turning south. It joins French Creek from the right side (facing downstream), near Wattsburg, at river mile 84.42 and drains 77.7 square miles. It drains portions of Northeast, Greenfield, and Venango townships and Wattsburg Borough in Pennsylvania. The low gradient West Branch and all of its tributaries are classified as WWF. The West Branch sub-basin contains the most extensive wetlands, including rare fens, of any Pennsylvania headwater area. Although this sub-basin still contains blocks of contiguous forest and undeveloped riparian areas, it is beginning to see development pressure from the city of Erie and North East. Work by Dr. J. Stauffer, et al, Penn State University, and other historic records have documented 26 species of fish from the West Branch sub-basin (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1992). These include the PA threatened mountain brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon greeleyi), and Ohio lamprey (Ichthyomyzon bdellium). According to surveys by WPC biologists, this stream also supports 13 freshwater mussel species, including a “viable population of the [former] federal candidate Epioblasma triqueta (snuffbox)” (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Townshipmulti- Municipalcomprehensive Plan
    THE BOROUGHOF EDINBORO, FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, AND WASHINGTON TOWNSHIPMULTI- MUNICIPALCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN JUNE2005 This project was financed, in part, by a Land Use Planning and Technical Assistance Program (LUPTAP) grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Community and Economic Development TABLEOF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER The Multi-Municipal Plan Why a New Plan? 1 The Comprehensive Plan - The Process and the Plan 1 What is Required in a Plan 2 The Process of Input 3 Local Leaders’ Questionnaire 3 Town Hall Meetings Washington Edinboro Franklin Summary Public Meeting Results 9 Washington Township 9 Borough of Edinboro 10 Franklin Township 13 Citizen Survey 15 Summary 18 Demographics and Census Data 19 Community Development Objectives 22 Land Use and Natural Resources 23 Introduction 23 Existing Land Use 23 Growing Greener 24 Option 1 26 Option 2 26 Current Land Use Controls 27 Edinboro 28 Franklin Township 30 Washington Township 31 Summary 33 The Community Resource Inventory/Environmental Considerations 34 Wetlands 34 Floodplains 34 State Game Lands and Prime Agriculture Soils 34 Natural Heritage Study 34 The Future Land Use Plan 35 Land Use Policies 36 Agricultural Protection 37 Housing 38 Edinboro 39 Franklin 39 Washington 39 Housing Plan 41 Transportation 42 Transit 42 Roads and Highways 43 Traffic Volumes 44 Safety Issues 45 Bikeways 47 Citizen Concerns 48 Transportation Plan 48 Transit 49 Bikeways 49 The Highway Network 51 Safety Projects 51 Special Corridor Studies 51 Other Potential Transportation Projects 53 Community
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • PRESQUE ISLE BAY AREA of CONCERN Final Stage 3 Remedial Action Plan: Delisting
    PRESQUE ISLE BAY AREA OF CONCERN Final Stage 3 Remedial Action Plan: Delisting Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Great Lakes December 2012 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2. BACI<:GROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Great Lakes Approach to Restoring Beneficial Uses ........................................................................ 8 2.2 Presque Isle Bay Area of Concern ....................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Delisting Restrictions on Dredging Activities BUI ......................................................................... 11 3.0 UPDATING THE BENEFICIAL USES EVALUATION ............................................................. 14 3.1 Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption ............................ ,................................................. 14 3.2 Tainting of Fish and Wildlife Flavor .................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Degraded Fish and Wildlife Populations ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Assessment of Streams in the Presque Isle Bay Watershed and Recommendations for Abatement of Non-Point Source Pollution
    Summary of Assessment of Streams in the Presque Isle Bay Watershed and Recommendations for Abatement of Non-Point Source Pollution Submitted to: Erie County Conservation District By: J. Michael Campbell Biology Department Mercyhurst College Harry R. Diz Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Gannon University Eric C. Obert Pennsylvania Sea Grant Penn State – Erie August, 2002 Introduction In July of 2000, the Erie County Conservation District was awarded a Growing Greener grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to conduct an assessment of the Presque Isle Bay watershed. The primary purpose of this two-year assessment was to provide information on the condition of the major streams flowing into the Bay and determine where significant non-point source pollution (NPSP) problems exist. This information was sought to provide the scientific basis for prioritizing NPSP problem areas, and initiate planning for watershed restoration. The work was partly justified because Erie’s Presque Isle Bay is one of 43 Areas of Concern (AOC) in the Great Lakes, and NPSP has been identified as a major source of the contaminants found in Bay sediments. From August 2000 through June 2002, an assessment team consisting of researchers from Mercyhurst College, Gannon University and Penn State Erie conducted a variety of field studies of the streams flowing to the Bay using Rapid Bioassessment Protocols developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999). The three-fold assessment included analysis of the physical and chemical features of sites selected for study, characterization of the fish communities, and studies of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities that inhabit the stream bottoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Planning Department
    Erie County Planning Department Act 167 County-Wide Watershed Stormwater Management Plan for Erie County Phase I – Scope of Study July 2008 200 West Kensinger Drive• Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066 • 724.779.4777 [phone] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 STORMWATER RUNOFF – ITS PROBLEMS AND ITS SOLUTIONS ...................................................... 1 PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 167) .................................................. 1 ACT 167 PLANNING FOR ERIE COUNTY ........................................................................................ 2 BENEFITS OF THE PLAN ................................................................................................................... 2 APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ................. 3 THE NEED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................... 4 PREVIOUS PLAN EFFORTS ............................................................................................................... 4 GENERAL COUNTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 5 TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................................................... 5 POLITICAL JURISDICTIONS ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Lake Erie Shore Region in Pennsylvania
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 174 WATER RESOURCES OF THE LAKE ERIE SHORE REGION IN PENNSYLVANIA By John W. Mangan, Donald W. VanTuyl, and Walter F. White, Jr. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CffiCULAR 174 WATER RESOURCES OF THE LAKE ERIE SHORE REGION IN PENNSYLVANIA By John W. Mangan, Donald W. VanTuyl, and Walter F. White, Jr. Based on data collected in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters, Pennsylvania Department of Internal Affairs, and Pennsylvania State Planning Board, Department of Commerce Washington, D. C., 1952 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction .................................. , ......... .. 1 Surface water-Continued Definition of terms ............................... .. Sevenmile Creek...................................... 22 Population and land area ........•................. Twelvemile Creek.................................... 24 Physical features, ................................. Sixteenmile Creek.................................... 26 Transportation ...................... ~ ............... 3 Ground water ..........................................-... 28 Climate ............................................... 3 Geology and hydrology... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. •. .. .. .. .. 28 Sources of water ...................................... 5 Location and yield of wells........................ 31 Surface water .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 77 Tuesday, No. 30 February 14, 2012 Part VI Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for the Rayed Bean and Snuffbox Mussels Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:11 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\14FER3.SGM 14FER3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 8632 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Species Information are swollen, turned forward and inward, and extended above the hingeline Rayed Bean Fish and Wildlife Service (Cummings and Mayer 1992, p. 162). The rayed bean is a small mussel, Beak sculpture consists of three or four 50 CFR Part 17 usually less than 1.5 inches (in) (3.8 faint, double-looped bars (Cummings centimeters (cm)) in length (Cummings and Mayer 1992, p. 162; Parmalee and [Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2010–0019; and Mayer 1992, p. 142; Parmalee and Bogan 1998, p. 108). The anterior end of 4500030113] Bogan 1998, p. 244; West et al. 2000, p. the shell is rounded, and the posterior 248). The shell outline is elongate or end is truncated, highly so in females. ovate in males and elliptical in females, RIN 1018–AV96 The posterior ridge is prominent, being and moderately inflated in both sexes, high and rounded, while the posterior Endangered and Threatened Wildlife but more so in females (Parmalee and slope is widely flattened. The posterior and Plants; Determination of Bogan 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie Bayfront NAACP and Pennfuture Lawsuit V. Federal
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ) ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ) ERIE UNIT 2262 and CITIZENS FOR ) PENNSYLVANIA’S FUTURE, ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. _______ ) ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, ) and ) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ) TRANSPORTATION, ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT 1. The City of Erie is home to a glistening section of waterfront on Lake Erie that residents, elected officials, and developers are equally anxious to see fully develop into a thriving place for people to live, work, and play. The Bayfront Parkway slices across the waterfront, severing downtown Erie and its residents from the waterfront’s amenities. The parkway zooms motorists—many struggling to comply with the 35 mile-per-hour posted speed limit—across Erie, ultimately connecting with the major interstates. The Bayfront Parkway and its speeding motorists serve as a barrier separating residents and visitors in downtown Erie from the diverse and growing waterfront amenities. 2. As a state road, the Bayfront Parkway and its future lie within the purview of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”). PennDOT has proposed the Bayfront 1 Parkway Project to address the parkway’s current problems and future needs as the waterfront develops. 3. While PennDOT recognizes the primary need for the project to “improve the pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and passenger vehicle connection of the Erie Central Business District and adjacent neighborhoods to the waterfront property north of the Bayfront Parkway,” Pa. Dep’t Transp., Categorical Exclusion Evaluation for the Central Bayfront Project 7 (2020), https://bayfrontparkwayproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2020-06-15-Approved-Level- 2-CE.pdf (“Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Development (PDF)
    Project ID Category Title County Improvement Type Construction Cost Primary Project Description State Route 3009 (Linesville Road) Bridge over Bennett Run North Shenango Township 497 Under Development SR 3009 Brdg/Bennett Run Crawford Bridge Rehabilitation 500000 null Bridge Rehabilitation/Restoration Malbett Place (Township Road 690) Bridge over Twelve Mile Creek Harborcreek Township 852 Under Development Malbett Place (T-690) Brg Erie Bridge Replacement 873000 null Local Bridge Replacement State Route 6 (Columbus Avenue) Bridge over Hare Creek City of Corry 995 Under Development Columbus Ave,Corry Brdg Erie Bridge Rehabilitation 200000 null Bridge Rehabilitation/Restoration Depot Street (Township Road 628) Bridge over Seven Mile Creek Harborcreek Township Local Bridge Replacement 1023 Under Development Depot St-T628 7 Mile Ck Erie Bridge Replacement 270000 null project was canceled Union-LeBoeuf Road (Township Road 672) Bridge over South Branch French Creek 1000 feet south of State Route 97 Union and Le Boeuf Townships 1036 Under Development Union-LeBoeuf (T-672) Brdg Erie Bridge Rehabilitation 140000 null Local Bridge Restoration/Rehabilitation West County Line Road (Township Road 301) Bridge over Sugar Run Greene Township 1669 Under Development W. Co. Line Rd (T-301) Br Mercer Bridge Replacement 650000 null Local Bridge Replacement Old Mercer Road (Township Road 401) Bridge over Neshannock Creek East Lackawannock Township 1670 Under Development Old Mercer Rd (T-401) Br Mercer Bridge Replacement 1420000 null Local Bridge Replacement Service Avenue Bridge over Pine Run City of Sharon 1884 Under Development Service Avenue Bridge Mercer Bridge Replacement 500000 null Local Bridge Replacement SR 1001 in Lockport to near Queens Run Woodward Township 3850 Under Development SR 1001 Improvements Clinton Reconstruct 6926435 null Safety Improvement Widen add lane Resurface SR 75 over Hunters Creek Turbett Township 4189 Under Development PA 75 Hunter's Ck.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Greenways
    NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA GREENWAYS Erie County, Pennsylvania DCNR Project No. BRC-12.5.2 Pashek Associates February 8, 2010 Amended by Erie County Planning Department Introduction What is a Greenway? 2 Why a Greenways Plan for Erie County? 2 How was the Greenways Plan Developed? 3 Three-Step Process 3 Public Participation 3 Purpose of the Greenways Plan 3 Goals and Objectives 4 Chapter One – Where are we now? Gathering the Data 6 Existing Plans, Studies, and Other Planning Efforts 6 Erie County Comprehensive Plan (2003) 6 Erie County Natural Heritage Inventory (1993) 7 Erie County Greenways and Trails Plan (2000) 8 Pennsylvania Statewide Greenway Plan (2001) 8 Trail Feasibility Studies 9 Watershed Management Plans / Water Quality Studies 10 Miscellaneous Plans 12 Municipal Comprehensive Plans and Other Land Use Tools 13 Statewide Recreation Planning: Keystone Active Zone 15 Natural and Ecological Infrastructure Inventories 16 Natural Infrastructure Inventory Map 17 Ecological Infrastructure Inventory Map 18 Erie County Natural Heritage Inventory Sites 19 Descriptions of Natural and Ecological Inventory Elements 21 Gray Infrastructure 29 Inactive Rail Lines 29 Highway Bike Lanes 30 Shared Use Paths 30 Park and Ride Lots 30 Bus, Train, and Water Taxi Terminals 31 Canals 31 Erie County Greenways Plan Recreational Opportunities Inventory 31 State Parks and Facilities 31 Community and Neighborhood Parks 32 Private Parks and Recreational Facilities 33 Campgrounds 33 Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths 33 Waterfront Access Areas 33 Fishing Opportunities
    [Show full text]