DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey of Historic Architectural Resources for the Proposed Ithaca Transmission Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey of Historic Architectural Resources for the Proposed Ithaca Transmission Project July 2008 Prepared for: New York State Electric and Gas Survey of Historic Architectural Resources for the Proposed Ithaca Transmission Project Etna, Tompkins County, to Lapeer, Cortland County, New York Prepared by: Burlington, New Jersey Survey of Historic Architectural Resources for the Proposed Ithaca Transmission Project Etna, Tompkins County, to Lapeer, Cortland County, New York Prepared for: New York State Electric and Gas Prepared by: Zana Wolf, Kate Jefferson, Martin Abbot, and Ingrid Wuebber URS Corporation 437 High Street Burlington, New Jersey 08016 609-386-5444 July 2008 SURVEY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED ITHACA TRANSMISSION PROJECT Abstract This report presents the results of a historic architectural investigation for the proposed Ithaca Transmission Project (ITP) performed for New York State Electric and Gas (NYSEG). The project is located east of Ithaca, New York, and consists of 29.8 miles of transmission line located between a substation on Route 13, just outside of the hamlet of Etna, Tompkins County, and the site of a proposed new substation in Lapeer, Cortland County, New York. The scope of this historic architectural investigation was to collect documentary evidence pursuant to the history of the project area, identify and document any structures 50 years in age or older within two miles laterally in either direction of the transmission line corridor, and make preliminary determinations of effect for historic structures eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The historic architectural survey was conducted during April and May 2008. During the survey, 735 resources 50 years or older were documented. URS has determined that nine resources in the survey area are listed on the National Register. Eight of these are individual resources and one is the Dryden Village Historic District. There are also nine resources in the survey area that have previously been determined eligible for the National Register. As a result of our survey, URS has determined that there are seven additional resources that are potentially eligible for the National Register. A preliminary determination of effect of the project upon these listed, eligible, and potentially eligible resources is included in Chapter 5. Overall, the ITP will have no adverse effect upon the historic architectural resources in the project area. i SURVEY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED ITHACA TRANSMISSION PROJECT Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. iii List of Photographs ......................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................1.1 2 Methodology ...............................................................................................................................................2.1 Background Research ...............................................................................................................................2.1 Fieldwork..................................................................................................................................................2.1 Reporting ..................................................................................................................................................2.1 3 Context of the Historic Architectural Project Area ................................................................................3.1 Settlement Period, 1789–1825..................................................................................................................3.1 Development Period, 1825–1870..............................................................................................................3.5 Dairy Farm Era, 1865–Present..................................................................................................................3.7 4 Results of Fieldwork...................................................................................................................................4.1 George Junior Republic, Route 38, Dryden, NY, URS Survey # 001 ......................................................4.3 462 Dryden-Harford Road, Harford, NY, URS Survey #263...................................................................4.8 Harford Inn, 380 Dryden-Harford Rd., Harford, NY, URS Survey #273...............................................4.11 2548 Clarks Corner Rd., Lapeer, NY, URS Survey # 344......................................................................4.14 1477 Route 13, Dryden, NY, URS Survey #394 ....................................................................................4.17 2 Monroe Street, Dryden, NY, URS Survey #646..................................................................................4.17 Dryden Village Hall, 16 South Street, Dryden, NY, URS Survey #691.................................................4.20 5 Conclusions and Recommendations .........................................................................................................5.1 References................................................................................................................................................... R.1 Appendix A: Project Mapping Appendix B: Previously Surveyed Sites Table Appendix C: Newly Surveyed Sites Table Appendix D: Historic Resource Inventory Forms for Potentially Eligible Resources ii SURVEY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED ITHACA TRANSMISSION PROJECT List of Figures Figure Page 3.1 Town of Dryden in 1866................................................................................................................3.3 3.2 Towns of Harford and Lapeer in 1876...........................................................................................3.4 List of Photographs Photograph Page 4.1 George Junior Republic, Max Chopnick Administration Building, north façade, view to the southeast......................................................................................................................4.4 4.2 George Junior Republic, Terry House north façade, view to the southwest ..................................4.4 4.3 George Junior Republic, Christ Chapel, southwest façade, view to the northeast .........................4.5 4.4 George Junior Republic, William R. George House, southwest façade, view to the northeast......4.5 4.5 George Junior Republic, Massachusetts Cottage, east façade, view to the west............................4.6 4.6 George Junior Republic, Upholstery Shop, north façade, view to the south..................................4.6 4.7 George Junior Republic, Cabinet Shop, north façade, view to the south .......................................4.7 4.8 George Junior Republic, Ed George Cottage, south façade, view to the north ..............................4.9 4.9 462 Dryden-Harford Road, southwest corner, view to the northeast .............................................4.9 4.10 462 Dryden-Harford Road, view to the southwest.......................................................................4.10 4.11 462 Dryden-Harford, barn and garage, view to the southwest.....................................................4.10 4.12 View northeast of the front façade of 380 Dryden-Harford Road from NY Route 38.................4.12 4.13 View east of the front (south) and side (west) façades of 380 Dryden-Harford Road .................4.12 4.14 View west of the rear of 380 Dryden-Harford Road, from NY Route 221..................................4.13 4.15 2548 Clarks Corner Road, north façade, view to the southeast....................................................4.15 4.16 2548 Clarks Corner Road, east façade, view to the southwest.....................................................4.15 4.17 2548 Clarks Corner Road, barn, silos, and outbuildings, view to the southwest .........................4.16 4.18 2548 Clarks Corner Road, barn, silos, view to the west...............................................................4.16 4.19 1477 Route 13, view to the south.................................................................................................4.18 4.20 1477 Route 13, view to the southeast...........................................................................................4.18 4.21 2 Monroe Street, view to the southwest .......................................................................................4.19 4.22 2 Monroe Street, View to the southeast .......................................................................................4.19 4.23 View south of Dryden Village Hall, 16 South Street...................................................................4.21 4.24 Detail view of George Street entranceway of 16 South Street, Dryden Village Hall...................4.21 iii SURVEY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED ITHACA TRANSMISSION PROJECT List of Tables Table Page 4.1 Listed and Eligible Resources in the Survey Area.........................................................................4.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 67 - Village of Lansing
    67 - Village of Lansing May 2016 Notice The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”) or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe privately owned rights and will assume no liability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or occurring in connection with, the use of information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA makes every effort to provide accurate information about copyright owners and related matters in the reports we publish. Contractors are responsible for determining and satisfying copyright or other use restrictions regarding the content of reports that they write, in compliance with NYSERDA’s policies and federal law. If you are the copyright owner and believe a NYSERDA report has not properly attributed your work to you or has used it without permission, please email [email protected] ii Photo Credit: Kevin W. Hall Tompkins County Community Microgrid Final Report – NY Prize Stage 1: Feasibility Assessment Submitted to: NYSERDA 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Submitted by: Prepared in partnership with: Tompkins County Hitachi Microgrids 125 East Court St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tompkins County HM Final Draft 01-16-14.Pdf
    This Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update has been completed by Barton & Loguidice, P.C., under the direction and support of the Tompkins County Planning Department. All jurisdictions within the County participated in this update process. A special thanks to the representatives and various project team members, whose countless time and effort on this project was instrumental in putting together a concise and meaningful document. Tompkins County Planning Department 121 East Court Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Tompkins County Department of Emergency Response Emergency Response Center 92 Brown Road Ithaca, New York 14850 Tompkins County Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 1.1 Background ..............................................................................................................3 1.2 Plan Purpose.............................................................................................................4 1.3 Planning Participants ...............................................................................................6 1.4 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ........................................................................8 2.0 Tompkins County Profile ..................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Mckinney's Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated Environmental Conservation Law Chapter 43-B
    Ch. 43-B, Art. 15, T. 27, Refs & Annos, NY ENVIR CONSER Ch. 43-B, Art. 15, T.... McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated Environmental Conservation Law Chapter 43-B. Of the Consolidated Laws Article 15. Water Resources Title 27. Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System McKinney's ECL Ch. 43-B, Art. 15, T. 27, Refs & Annos Currentness McKinney's E. C. L. Ch. 43-B, Art. 15, T. 27, Refs & Annos, NY ENVIR CONSER Ch. 43-B, Art. 15, T. 27, Refs & Annos Current through L.2021, chapters 1 to 110. Some statute sections may be more current, see credits for details. End of Document © 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. © 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 § 15-2701. Statement of policy and legislative findings, NY ENVIR CONSER § 15-2701 McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated Environmental Conservation Law (Refs & Annos) Chapter 43-B. Of the Consolidated Laws (Refs & Annos) Article 15. Water Resources (Refs & Annos) Title 27. Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System (Refs & Annos) McKinney's ECL § 15-2701 § 15-2701. Statement of policy and legislative findings Currentness 1. The legislature hereby finds that many rivers of the state, with their immediate environs, possess outstanding natural, scenic, historic, ecological and recreational values. 2. Improvident development and use of these rivers and their immediate environs will deprive present and future generations of the benefit and enjoyment of these unique and valuable resources. 3. It is hereby declared to be the policy of this state that certain selected rivers of the state which, with their immediate environs, possess the aforementioned characteristics, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition and that they and their immediate environs shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Tompkins County Profile
    This Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update has been completed by Barton & Loguidice, P.C., under the direction and support of the Tompkins County Planning Department. All jurisdictions within the County participated in this update process. A special thanks to the representatives and various project team members, whose countless time and effort on this project was instrumental in putting together a concise and meaningful document. Tompkins County Planning Department 121 East Court Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Tompkins County Department of Emergency Response Emergency Response Center 92 Brown Road Ithaca, New York 14850 Tompkins County DRAFT Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Plan Purpose ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Planning Participants ............................................................................................ 6 1.4 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ..................................................................... 8 2.0 Tompkins County Profile .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Ithaca Police Department 120 East Clinton Street, Ithaca, New York, USA 14851-6557 ______John R
    City of Ithaca Police Department 120 East Clinton Street, Ithaca, New York, USA 14851-6557 _____________________________________________________________ John R. Barber, Chief of Police Pete Tyler, Deputy Chief of Police Vincent P. Monticello, Deputy Chief of Police Media Release Prepared by: Officer Jamie Williamson Date Prepared: February 2, 2017 On Saturday February 4, 2017 a commercial truck towing an exceptionally long commercial load is scheduled to travel through Ithaca in a southerly direction. Combined, the truck and trailer are over 380 feet long and twenty feet wide. Traffic patterns in Ithaca will be changed to accommodate this load. The load is scheduled to enter Ithaca on New York State Route 34 (East Shore Drive) at 9:30 am. From there the load is scheduled to take the following path through Ithaca: Southbound on East Shore Drive Southbound on New York State Route 13 Southbound on North/South Meadow Street (Meadow Street will be closed for this portion of the trip from the intersection of Meadow/Hancock to Meadow/Clinton) Southbound on Elmira Road exiting the City of Ithaca If you do find yourself in the area while the load is traveling through Ithaca please follow the directions of police officers and flaggers on scene. Due to the complexity of the logistics associated with towing such a long, heavy load through a municipality the timeframes could change on short notice. Please monitor local media outlets or the IPD Facebook page for updates/changes in traffic patterns. Motorists are kindly requested to avoid the area while the load is traveling through Ithaca. Police Dispatcher: 607-272-3245 Police Administration: 607-272-9973 .
    [Show full text]
  • PENDING PETITION MEMO Date
    , * PENDING PETITION MEMO Date: 10/23/2006 10/23/2006 TO : OE&E OGC FROM: CENTRAL OPERATIONS UTILITY: NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION SUBJECT: 06-T-1298 Application of New York State Electric & Gas Corporation for a Certificate of Environmental Compatability and Public Need under Article VII of the PSL for the Construction and Operation of Approximately 30 Miles of New or Rebuilt 115 kV Electric Transmission Line and the Construction of a New 345 kV / 115 kV Substation Located in Tompkins and Cortland Counties. 10/23/2006. MOTION FOR WAIVER OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FILED BY NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC AND GAS CORPORATION. .RECEIVED LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MAcg^g^iL^PM ^29 NEW YORK 12 5 WEST 55TH STREET LONDON A MULTINATIONAL WASHINGTON, DC. PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK, NY IOOI9-5389 ALBANY PARIS (212) 484-8000 BOSTON BRUSSELS CHICAGO FACSIMILE: (212) 42-4-6500 JOHANNESBURG HARTFORD (PTfl LTD. HOUSTON E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] MOSCOW JACKSONVILLE RIYADH WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: (2 I 2) 424-82 I 7 LOS ANGELES AFFILIATED OFFICE PITTSBURGH WRITER'S DIRECT FAX: (2 I 2) 640-0466 ALMATY SAN FRANCISCO BEIJING October 23, 2006 Hon. Jaclyn A. Brilling Secretary New York State Public Service Commission Three Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 Re: Application of New York State Electric Gas Corporation for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need under Article VII of the New York State Public Service Law for the Ithaca Transmission Project, Tompkins and Cortland Counties, NY Dear Secretary Brilling: On Saturday, October 21, 2006, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation's consultant, URS Corporation, forwarded to you for filing today ten copies of the above-referenced application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Tier's Approach to Economic Growth
    Regional Economic Development Council of the Southern Tier SOUTHERN TIER THE SOUTHERN TIER’S APPROACH TO ECONOMIC GROWTH Catalytic, Collaborative, Comprehensive, Competitive SouthErn TIER Delivered to the U.S. Navy in June 2011, the 100th fully missionized MH-60R helicopter departs from Lockheed Martin, Owego. The systems integrator for the aircraft, Lockeed Martin integrated the helicopter’s digital cockpit, multi-mode radar, acoustic sonar suite, long-range infrared camera and other advanced sensors to detect, identify, track and engage surface and subsurface targets. 2 SouthErn TIER Catalytic, Collaborative, Comprehensive, Competitive Regional Economic Development Council of the Southern Tier STRatEGIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2011–2016 “Catalytic, Collaborative, Comprehensive, Competitive” Table of Contents Section I. Introduction and Executive Summary A. Introduction 9 B. Philosophy and Approach 9 C. Summary of Existing Conditions and Economic Opportunities 10 D. Vision 18 E. Economic Development Strategy and Components 18 F. How Strategies Will Transform the Region’s Economy 25 G. Implementation Agenda 28 H. Performance Measurement 34 Section II. Existing Conditions and Strategic Opportunities Part 1. Regional Assessment of Existing Conditions and Economic Opportunities A. Southern Tier Overview 39 B. Demographic and Socioeconomic Trends 45 C. Education 48 D. Health 49 E. Housing 51 F. Labor 52 G. Infrastructure 57 H. Natural Resources 61 3 Table of Contents PART 2. Southern Tier’s Principal Growth Sectors and Clusters A. Industry Growth Trends 64 B. Industry Custer Analysis 65 Section III. Vision Statement A. Regional Economic Development Vision for the Southern Tier 73 B. Strategies 73 C. Critical Issues to be Addressed and Opportunities to be Seized 74 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Resort Area Plan the Beach Resort Area Includes Most of the Village’S Resort and Tourist-Oriented Activities
    106 I. SUMMARY MAJOR VILLAGE GOAL: Conservation and improvement of the desirable qualities of the Village through implementation of planning policies that serve to maintain a suitable balance of uses and densities while allowing for appropriate future development. Removal and improvement of the undesirable qualities of the Village through implementation of planning policies and programs that will serve to complement the desirable qualities of the Village. GENERAL LAND USE GOALS: A distribution of types and densities of land use that meets the physical, social, cultural and economic needs of the present and future residents and the needs of present and future tourists. A land use pattern that provides options for a variety of residential living environments, opportunities for recreation and culture, and desirable location of tourist and other resident-serving businesses. A land use pattern that is consistent with the capabilities of the street system, sewage disposal system, water distribution system, drainage facilities, public open space, and natural environmental systems. A land use pattern that separates and ensures non-encroachment of incompatible types and densities of land uses. 107 BASIC PREMISES AND ASSUMPTIONS The basic premises and assumptions that have had the most obvious and direct influence on the Plan are summarized below. Statements on the full implications of these premises and assumptions are included in the appropriate sections of the Plan and the Planning Reference Guide. Many of the premises and assumptions are based on goals and objectives established to guide the development of the Plan or on various projections. REGIONAL OPPORTUNITIES The location of Sylvan Beach, its adjacency to the Lake and the Canal, is its most important regional opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plus Site: an Iroquoian Remote Camp in Upland Tompkins County, Ny*
    NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST, Vol. 21(3) 181-215, 2000 THE PLUS SITE: AN IROQUOIAN REMOTE CAMP IN UPLAND TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY* TIMOTHY J. ABEL Public Archaeology Facility, Binghamton University ABSTRACT Between 1997 and 1998, the Public Archaeology Facility, at Binghamton University, was contracted by the New York State Education Department on behalf of the Department of Transportation to conduct investigations of the Plus site (SUBi-1736; NYSM #10494), located in the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York. The site occupies an inland setting in the Virgil/Fall Creek watershed, lying on a glacial gravel hill adjacent to Willow Glen Cemetery along NY Route 13. Site examination and data recovery excavations in threatened areas of the site revealed a cluster of Late Woodland cultural features including hearths, a storage/refuse pit, and postmolds. The artifactual materials from these cultural features suggest the Plus site func- tioned as an Iroquois remote camp occupied during the late 14th century. The Plus site represents the first Iroquois remote campsite in central New York to receive intensive subsurface investigation. INTRODUCTION Iroquoian archaeologists have traditionally given research priority to village sites, in an attempt to trace the developmental history of the various historically- contacted nations (e.g., Niemczycki, 1984; Ritchie, 1980; Tuck, 1971; Wray and *Funding for the Plus site investigation was provided by the State Department of Transportation under the 1999-2000 Highway Program. 181 Ó 2000, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 182 / ABEL Schoff, 1953). This has been predictable given the more certain abundance of chronological and contextual data (i.e., ceramics, houses) to be found in areas with long habitation periods such as villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Virgil
    STATE OF NEW YORK : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of the Alleged Violations of Article 23, Title 27 of the Environmental Conservation Law (“ECL”) RULING ON MOTION and Parts 420-425 of Title 6 of the TO DISMISS AND Official Compilation of Codes, Rules CROSS-MOTION TO and Regulations of the State DISMISS AFFIRMATIVE of New York (“6 NYCRR”) by the DEFENSES TOWN OF VIRGIL, Respondent. Case No. R7-20031106-128 PROCEEDINGS In a notice of hearing and complaint dated September 21, 2007, staff of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“Department”) alleged that respondent, the Town of Virgil (the “Town” or “Respondent”), violated Article 23, Title 27 of the Environmental Conservation Law (“ECL”) and Parts 420- 425 of Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules, and Regulations of the State of New York (“6 NYCRR”) by failing to reclaim a mine known as the Osbeck Gravel Pit (the “Mine”). The Mine is located due east of New York State Route 13 in the Town of Cortlandville, Cortland County, New York. In the complaint, Department Staff asked the Commissioner to order the Town to reclaim the Mine, and to impose a $35,000 penalty. The Town served a timely answer to the complaint on October 16, 2007. In the answer, the Town denied that it was responsible for reclaiming the Mine, and asserted six affirmative defenses. Pursuant to Section 622.9 of 6 NYCRR, on October 26, 2007, Department Staff filed a statement of readiness with the Department’s Office of Hearings and Mediation Services (“OHMS”).
    [Show full text]
  • May 5, 2021 Common Council Agenda. Pursuant to the New York State Executive Orders, This Meeting
    Date: 05-05-2021 COMMON COUNCIL Time: 6:00 PM Location: City of Ithaca Public AGENDA ITEMS Meetings YouTube Channel Item Voting Presenter(s) Time Allotted Item Call to Order No Mayor Svante L. Myrick 10 Mins 1.1 Additions to or Deletions from the Agenda 1.2 Proclamations/Awards 1.3 Special Presentations Before Council No Deputy Director of 15 Mins - Report on the status of the City’s economic Economic Development – development efforts including pandemic response Knipe and recovery. 1.4 Reports of Municipal Officials 2.1 Petitions and Hearings of Persons before Council No *Note: See instructions 60 Mins 2.2 Privilege of the Floor – Mayor and Council No on how to participate on page 2 of the agenda. Consent Agenda Items 3.1 DPW – Reallocation of Position – Chief Water Yes Common Council 5 Mins Treatment Plant Operator 3.2 DPW - Request to Allocate Contingency Funds to Community Beautification Program 3.3 IFD - Amendment to Personnel Roster 3.4 IURA – Community Housing Development Fund, Round #20 – Authorize Disbursement of Funds Pursuant to an Executed MOU 3.4A Third MOU with Tompkins County and Cornell University to Continue the Community Housing Development Fund Thru 2027 – Declaration of Lead Agency 3.4B IURA - Third MOU with Tompkins County and Cornell University to Continue the Community Housing Development Fund Thru 2027 – Environmental Review 3.4C IURA – Third MOU with Tompkins County and Cornell University to Continue the Community Housing Development Fund Thru 2027 – Action Item Voting Presenter(s) Time Allotted Item Consent Agenda Items- Continued Yes Common Council 5 Mins 3.5 DPW – Walkable Ithaca: Giles Street Sidewalk Project 3.6 DPW – South Albany Street Bridge Project 3.7 WWTP – Approval of Permanent Water and Access Easements and Rights-of-Way for City of Ithaca Water Main 3.8 Mayor – Increase in Hours for Certain Positions 3.9 A Local Law to Amend Section C-24 of the City of Ithaca Charter Regarding the Examining Board of Electricians City Administration Committee Items 4.1 Resolution for Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Yes Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan Final Report September 2009 Prepared By: Town of Ulysses COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ulysses Town Board The update of the 1999 Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan began in 2006. The Comprehensive Plan Update Committee would like to recognize current and former Town Board members for their support for this project. • Douglas Austic, Supervisor (Current) • Roxanne Marino, Councilperson (Former) • Don Ellis, Councilperson (Former) • Elizabeth Thomas, Councilperson (Current) • Gerald Ferrentino, Councilperson (Current) • Lucia Tyler, Councilperson (Current) • David Kerness, Councilperson (Current) Comprehensive Plan Update Committee The Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan Update Committee was comprised of volunteers who contributed much effort, time, and energy in order to ensure the successful completion of the update of the Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan. x Sue Poelvoorde, Town Resident, Committee Chair x Bob Brown, Village Resident x Deirdre Cunningham, Village of Trumansburg Comprehensive Plan Representative x Heather Filiberto, Village Resident x Rod Hawkes, Planning Board Representative x Roxanne Marino, Town Resident x Sue Ritter, Town Resident x Elizabeth Thomas, Town Board Representative x Dave Tyler, Town Resident x Bob Weatherby, Agricultural Business Representative x John Wertis, Agricultural Business Representative The volunteer members of the Comprehensive Plan Update Committee would like to thank the many Town of Ulysses residents and landowners who provided input into this update
    [Show full text]