DOCSLIB.ORG

Operator's Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operator's Manual The Sprayer Operator’s Manual COMMANDER 4500/5500/7000 Instruction book 67024103 - Version 1.10 US - 04.2016 COMMANDER 4500/5500/7000 Instruction book 67024103 - Version 1.10 US - 04.2016 HARDI® reserves the right to make changes in design, material, or specification without notice thereof. HARDI® and other product names are registered trademarks of HARDI® Inc. in the U.S. and in other countries. Table of Contents 1 - Welcome Welcome letter ......................................................................................................................................7 2 - Safety notes Operator safety .....................................................................................................................................9 Symbols ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 General info ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Label explanation ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Local poison information center .........................................................................................................12 3 - Description General info .........................................................................................................................................13 View View ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Identification plates ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Roadworthiness ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Sprayer use .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Frame .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Tanks and equipment ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Liquid system ......................................................................................................................................16 Pump .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Valves and symbols ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 DynamicFluid4 pressure regulation ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Clean water tank .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Rinsing tank ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Filters ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 EasyClean filter ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 CycloneFilter .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 TurboFiller ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Diagram - Basic liquid system ..................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Diagram - Liquid system with optional extras .................................................................................................................................. 23 Boom ...................................................................................................................................................24 Boom Operator’s Manual ............................................................................................................................................................................... 24 AutoTerrain (optional) ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Hydraulic systems ...............................................................................................................................25 Hydraulic blocks ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Open center hydraulics ................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Equipment ...........................................................................................................................................27 SafeTrack ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Driving technique for SafeTrack ................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Platform ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Drawbars .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 Hydraulic support leg ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Tank level indicator ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 External Cleaning Device (optional) ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 Nozzle pressure gauge .................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 SafetyLocker ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 ChemLocker ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 4 - Sprayer setup General info .........................................................................................................................................33 Unloading the sprayer from the truck ................................................................................................................................................... 33 Pulling the sprayer at the tie down hooks .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Before putting the sprayer into operation .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NS14 ASSOCIATION NATIONAL BOAT REGISTER Sail No. Hull
    NS14 ASSOCIATION NATIONAL BOAT REGISTER Boat Current Previous Previous Previous Previous Previous Original Sail No. Hull Type Name Owner Club State Status MG Name Owner Club Name Owner Club Name Owner Club Name Owner Club Name Owner Club Name Owner Allocated Measured Sails 2070 Midnight Midnight Hour Monty Lang NSC NSW Raced Midnight Hour Bernard Parker CSC Midnight Hour Bernard Parker 4/03/2019 1/03/2019 Barracouta 2069 Midnight Under The Influence Bernard Parker CSC NSW Raced 434 Under The Influence Bernard Parker 4/03/2019 10/01/2019 Short 2068 Midnight Smashed Bernard Parker CSC NSW Raced 436 Smashed Bernard Parker 4/03/2019 10/01/2019 Short 2067 Tiger Barra Neil Tasker CSC NSW Raced 444 Barra Neil Tasker 13/12/2018 24/10/2018 Barracouta 2066 Tequila 99 Dire Straits David Bedding GSC NSW Raced 338 Dire Straits (ex Xanadu) David Bedding 28/07/2018 Barracouta 2065 Moondance Cat In The Hat Frans Bienfeldt CHYC NSW Raced 435 Cat In The Hat Frans Bienfeldt 27/02/2018 27/02/2018 Mid Coast 2064 Tiger Nth Degree Peter Rivers GSC NSW Raced 416 Nth Degree Peter Rivers 13/12/2017 2/11/2013 Herrick/Mid Coast 2063 Tiger Lambordinghy Mark Bieder PHOSC NSW Raced Lambordinghy Mark Bieder 6/06/2017 16/08/2017 Barracouta 2062 Tiger Risky Too NSW Raced Ross Hansen GSC NSW Ask Siri Ian Ritchie BYRA Ask Siri Ian Ritchie 31/12/2016 Barracouta 2061 Tiger Viva La Vida Darren Eggins MPYC TAS Raced Rosie Richard Reatti BYRA Richard Reatti 13/12/2016 Truflo 2060 Tiger Skinny Love Alexis Poole BSYC SA Raced Skinny Love Alexis Poole 15/11/2016 20/11/2016 Barracouta
    [Show full text]
  • On the Instabilities of Tropical Cyclones Generated by Cloud Resolving Models
    SERIES A DYANAMIC METEOROLOGY Tellus AND OCEANOGRAPHY PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM On the instabilities of tropical cyclones generated by cloud resolving models By DAVID A. SCHECTERÃ, NorthWest Research Associates, Boulder, CO, USA (Manuscript received 30 May 2018; in final form 29 August 2018) ABSTRACT An approximate method is developed for finding and analysing the main instability modes of a tropical cyclone whose basic state is obtained from a cloud resolving numerical simulation. The method is based on a linearised model of the perturbation dynamics that distinctly incorporates the overturning secondary circulation of the vortex, spatially inhomogeneous eddy diffusivities, and diabatic forcing associated with disturbances of moist convection. Although a general formula is provided for the latter, only parameterisations of diabatic forcing proportional to the local vertical velocity perturbation and modulated by local cloudiness of the basic state are implemented herein. The instability analysis is primarily illustrated for a mature tropical cyclone representative of a category 4 hurricane. For eddy diffusivities consistent with the fairly conventional configuration of the simulation that generates the basic state, perturbation growth is dominated by a low azimuthal wavenumber instability having greatest asymmetric kinetic energy density in the lower tropospheric region of the inner core of the vortex. The characteristics of the instability mode are inadequately explained by nondivergent 2D dynamics. Moreover, the growth rate and modal structure are sensitive to reasonable variations of the diabatic forcing. A second instability analysis is conducted for a mature tropical cyclone generated under conditions of much weaker horizontal diffusion. In this case, the linear model predicts a relatively fast high-wavenumber instability that is insensitive to the parameterisation of diabatic forcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulations of a Surface Piercing A- Class Catamaran Hydrofoil and Comparison Against Model Tests
    Journal of Sailing Technology, Article 2017-04. © 2017, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF A SURFACE PIERCING A- CLASS CATAMARAN HYDROFOIL AND COMPARISON AGAINST MODEL TESTS Thilo Keller TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany Juryk Henrichs DNV GL SE, Potsdam, Germany Dr. Karsten Hochkirch Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/jst/article-pdf/2/01/1/2205567/sname-jst-2017-04.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 DNV GL SE, Potsdam, Germany Dr. Andrés Cura Hochbaum TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany Manuscript received March 1, 2017; accepted April 4, 2017. Abstract: Hydrofoil supported sailing vessels gained more and more importance within the last years. Due to new processes of manufacturing, it is possible to build slender section foils with low drag coefficients and heave stable hydrofoil geometries are becoming possible to construct. These surface piercing foils often tend to ventilate and cause cavitation at high speeds. The aim of this work is to define a setup to calculate the hydrodynamic forces on such foils with RANS CFD and to investigate whether the onset of ventilation and cavitation can be predicted with sufficient accuracy. Therefore, a surface piercing hydrofoil of an A-Class catamaran is simulated by using the RANS software FineMarine with its volume of fluid method. The C-shaped hydrofoil is analyzed for one speed at Froude Number 7.9 and various angles of attack (AoA) by varying rake and leeway angle in ranges actually used while sailing. In addition, model tests were carried out in the K27 cavitation tunnel of TU-Berlin, for the given hydrofoil and in the same conditions as simulated with CFD to provide data for validation.
    [Show full text]
  • International Dredging Review JULY/AUGUST 2009 VOLUME 28, NUMBER 4
    International Dredging Review JULY/AUGUST 2009 VOLUME 28, NUMBER 4 IN THIS ISSUE: Sand and Gravel Dredging A capping project is a major customer for Wisconsin producers. Page 6 The high-profile Hudson River cleanup project proceeds – carefully. Page 14 Recovery dredging projects are running full tilt. Contract Awards starting on page 17. Vortex Marine’s DB Vengeance working in the Richmond, California entrance channel on a misty July afternoon. Story on page 12. On the Cover: BUILDING THE PUMPOUT SYSTEM Description courtesy of Manson Construction Vortex Marine Construction Using DB Vengeance In recent years, in-water disposal has At Richmond Entrance Channel Maintenance become more and more of an environmental concern in the San Francisco Bay area, and all Dredged Material Is Used for Marsh Creation parties involved have been searching for alter- feet wide. Despite its size, the project only native disposal sites. More than 90 percent of includes 150,000 cubic yards of material and the Bay’s marsh and wetlands have disap- another 100,000 of possible overdepth materi- peared through development. al, because the depth of the siltation overall is The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in part- not that great, explained Dave Doak, San nership with the California State Coastal Francisco District Senior Project Manager for Conservancy and the Port of Oakland, have the Richmond job. developed the Hamilton Wetlands Restoration The dredge is loading into two 3000-cubic- Project (HWRP) to address these two environ- yard closed hopper barges for transport to the mental concerns. The project takes dredged Liberty Offloader, which is moored 10 miles material from the Ports of Oakland and from Richmond and five miles offshore from Richmond and deposits it for beneficial re-use the Hamilton Wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Free-Rotating Wing Sail for an Autonomous Sailboat
    DEGREE PROJECT IN VEHICLE ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2017 Design of a free-rotating wing sail for an autonomous sailboat CLAES TRETOW KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES ! ! ! ! Design of a free-rotating wing sail for an autonomous sailboat Claes Tretow ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Degree Project in Naval Architecture (30 credits) Degree Programme in Naval Architecture (120 credits) Degree Programme in Vehicle Engineering (300 credits) The Royal Institute of Technology 2017 Supervisors: Jakob Kuttenkeuler, Mikael Razola Examiner: Jakob Kuttenkeuler ! ! 2 Abstract There is an accelerating need for ocean sensing where autonomous vehicles can play a key role in assisting engineers, researcher and scientists with environmental monitoring and colleting oceanographic data. This thesis is performed in collaboration with a research group at The Royal Institute of Technology that currently develops an autonomous sailboat to be used as a sensor carrying platform for autonomous data acquisition in the Baltic Sea. This type of vehicle has potentials to be a helpful and cheaper alternative to a commercial research vessel. The thesis presents the design, construction and experimental testing of a rigid free-rotating wing sail for this autonomous sailboat. The goal is to design a rig that can sustain under all occurring weather conditions in the Baltic sea while ensuring sailing performance, robustness, reliability and low power consumption, which are key aspects driving the design. The rig is designed through the utilization of analysis and design methods involving a Vortex Lattice Method combined with a Velocity Prediction Program in order to achieve best possible aerodynamic performance with respect to the application requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Portsmouth Yardstick 2010 2
    Standard Portmouth Yardstick Numbers Complete Numerical Listing Valid from 9th March 2010. Class PY NO Pursuit Race No Class PY NO Pursuit Race No 18' Skiff a 675 68 Seafly c 1087 109 Foiling Moth 690 69 420 c 1087 109 49er a 744 74 405 a 1089 109 RS 800 a 822 82 Laser 2000 a 1090 109 International 14 * Non Foil 840 84 National 12 * o 1089 109 Laser 5000 a 846 85 Redwing c 1094 109 Boss a 847 85 Wayfarer c 1101 110 RS 700 a 857 86 Laser Vago SD S/H a 1100 110 Canoe International a 870 87 Laser Radial o 1104 110 B 14 a 874 87 OK o 1109 111 Musto Skiff a 875 88 Leader c 1115 112 Flying Dutchman c 879 88 Enterprise o 1116 112 505 c 902 90 Snipe o 1117 112 RS K6 a 903 90 GP 14 c 1127 113 Canoe International o 905 91 Wanderer c 1139 114 59er a 905 91 GP 14 o 1136 114 Laser 4000 a 908 91 Europe o 1140 114 RS 600 o 920 92 Byte CII o 1140 114 29er a 924 92 Lightening 368 o 1152 115 ISO a 926 93 Mercury c 1152 115 Javelin c 926 93 Solo o 1155 116 Cherub * 2005 a 930 93 Byte o 1165 117 Spice a 930 93 Firefly o 1165 117 Laser Vortex a 937 94 Streaker o 1162 116 Osprey c 940 94 Graduate o 1165 117 RS 400 a 950 95 British Moth o 1168 117 National 18 c 957 96 Comet o 1177 118 Laser Vortex o 960 96 Comet Duo o 1175 118 RS 500 a 972 97 Laser 4.7 o 1175 118 470 c 973 97 Miracle c 1185 119 Hornet c 973 97 Splash o 1184 118 Cherub * 1997 a 975 98 RS Feva XL a 1200 120 International Moth * Non Foil 980 98 Topaz Duo o 1190 119 Fireball c 982 98 Pacer o 1193 119 Contender o 993 99 Bosun c 1198 120 RS 300 o 1000 100 Challenger o 1200 120 Buzz a 1002 100 YW
    [Show full text]
  • THE LEADING-EDGE VORTEX of YACHT SAILS I Viola, a Arredondo-Galeana
    THE LEADING-EDGE VORTEX OF YACHT SAILS I Viola, A Arredondo-Galeana To cite this version: I Viola, A Arredondo-Galeana. THE LEADING-EDGE VORTEX OF YACHT SAILS. INNOVSAIL International Conference on Innovation in High Performance Sailing Yachts, CVET and Ecole Navale, Jun 2017, Lorient, France. pp.115-126. hal-01583540 HAL Id: hal-01583540 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01583540 Submitted on 7 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Fourth International Conference on Innovation in High Performance Sailing Yachts, Lorient, France THE LEADING-EDGE VORTEX OF YACHT SAILS I. M. Viola, Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK, [email protected] A. Arredondo-Galeana, Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK, [email protected] It has been suggested that a stable Leading Edge Vortex (LEV) can be formed from the sharp leading edge of asymmetric spinnakers. If the LEV remains stably attached to the leading edge, it provides an increase in the thrust force. Until now, however, the existence of a stable and attached LEV has only been shown by numerical simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sail Performance Analysis of Sailing Yachts by Numerical Calculations and Experiments
    5 Sail Performance Analysis of Sailing Yachts by Numerical Calculations and Experiments Y. Tahara, Y. Masuyama, T. Fukasawa and M. Katori National Maritime Research Institute, Kanazawa Institute of Technology Osaka Prefecture University, North Sails Japan 1. Introduction Sails of a sailing yacht can be considered as multiple soft thin wings (membrane wings) with relative large cambers, and are often used at large attack angles. The shape of sail is determined as an equilibrium state of both aerodynamic force and tension acting on the sail surface. In particular, a spinnaker used for the running condition is a very soft membrane like a parachute, and the shape is simply formed by self-generated aerodynamic forces which are strongly affected by the sail shape itself. These facts lead to new challenges in the present problem, i.e., in the measurements the sail shape must be accurately measured in the flying condition, and in numerical simulation of flow and forces the sail flying shape is correctly given or predicted as a part of solution. The present study concerns the authors’ ongoing effort on analyses of sail performance of sailing yachts by numerical calculations and experiments, and in this paper, the focus of discussions is more on the former. Two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods are used in the present study, and the results are validated through detailed comparison with experimental data. The data are obtained in onboard full-scale measurements by using a sail dynamometer boat. Our study concerns both the upwind and downwind sailing conditions; however, we focus on the former in the present chapter due to the limitation of space in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of a Vortex Ring with a Piston Vortex
    J. Fluid Mech. (2002), vol. 465, pp. 353–378. c 2002 Cambridge University Press 353 DOI: 10.1017/S0022112002001118 Printed in the United Kingdom Interaction of a vortex ring with a piston vortex By J. J. ALLEN AND B. AUVITY Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton† University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA (Received 5 March 2001 and in revised form 28 February 2002) Recent studies on vortex ring generation, e.g. Rosenfeld et al. (1998), have highlighted the subtle effect of generation geometry on the final properties of rings. Experimental generation of vortex rings often involves moving a piston through a tube, resulting in a vortex ring being generated at the tube exit. A generation geometry that has been cited as a standard consists of the tube exit mounted flush with a wall, with the piston stroke ending at the tube exit, Glezer (1988). We employ this geometry to investigate the effect of the vortex that forms in front of the advancing piston (piston vortex)on the primary vortex ring that is formed at the tube exit. It is shown that when the piston finishes its stroke flush with the wall, and hence forms an uninterrupted plane, the piston vortex is convected through the primary ring and then ingested into the primary vortex. The ingestion of the piston vortex results in an increased ring impulse and an altered trajectory, when compared to the case when the piston motion finishes inside the tube. As the Reynolds number of the experiments, based on the piston speed and piston diameter, is the order of 3000, transition to turbulence is observed during the self-induced translation phase of the ring motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Analysis of a C-Class-Like Catamaran in Simplified
    an author's https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/20807 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.008 Fiumara, Alessandro and Gourdain, Nicolas and Chapin, Vincent and Senter, Julien Aerodynamic analysis of a C- class-like catamaran in simplified unsteady wind conditions using LES and URANS modeling. (2018) Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 180. 262-275. ISSN 0167-6105 Aerodynamic analysis of a C-class-like catamaran in simplified unsteady wind conditions using LES and URANS modeling Alessandro Fiumara a,*, Nicolas Gourdain b, Vincent Chapin b, Julien Senter c a Assystem Technologies and ISAE-Supaero, Toulouse, France b ISAE-Supaero, Toulouse, France c Assystem Technologies, Toulouse, France 1. Introduction shapes in unsteady flow conditions, like flapped wings, and are largely exploited by insects and flying animals to enhance their flying capa- The interest for wingsails has grown since their introduction on bilities (Maxworthy, 1979; Ellington et al., 1996; Muijres et al., 2008). America's Cup catamarans in 2013. Wingsails enhance the yacht per- On bat wings, the increase in lift due to the LEV is of 40% (Muijres formance thanks to the achievement of larger lift-to-drag ratio and et al., 2008). LEVs are also exploited in the aeronautic field to increase maximum lift coefficients with respect to soft sails. However, the the lift of delta wings. In the naval domain, (Viola and larger aerodynamic forces acting on the wingsail can compromise the Arredondo-Galeana, 2017), performing PIV experimental tests, stability of the yacht during navigation especially in unsteady condi- observed and analyzed the formation of LEV on a soft spinnaker tions, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Velocity Prediction of Wing-Sailed Hydrofoiling Catamarans
    Journal of Sailing Technology 2019, volume 4, issue 1, pp. 66 - 83. The Society of Naval Architects anD Marine Engineers. Velocity Prediction of Wing-Sailed Hydrofoiling Catamarans Nils Hagemeister Formerly University of Auckland, New ZealanD, [email protected] Richard G. J. Flay University of AucklanD, New ZealanD, [email protected] Manuscript receiveD January 1, 2018; revision receiveD January 2, 2018; accepteD January 3, 2018. Abstract. The paper presents a Velocity Prediction Program for hydrofoiling catamarans with solid wing sails. Starting from a description of the mechanical moDel, suitable models are identified for the forces that act on the boat components. The stuDy is Deliberately limiteD to means for restricteD methoDs where computational resources and budgets are limited. EnhanceD lifting line approaches are described for the wingsail anD appenDages. WinDage is calculated from force coefficients and dynamic pressure while hull resistance is determined by means of a potential flow solver. The description of the implementation is followeD by the presentation of the results. An approach for processing of measurement data is shown in preparation to compare measureD anD preDicteD performance. Good agreement was found for upwinD conDitions whereas varying differences are founD for most of the remaining wind angles. Finally, some of the challenges encountereD During the stuDy are discusseD. Keywords: Velocity PreDiction Program, HyDrofoil, Wingsail, Performance Analysis NOMENCLATURE A Reference area [m²] AoA Angle of
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaussian Laser Beam Transformation Into an Optical Vortex
    Gaussian laser beam transformation into an optical vortex beam by helical lens Ljiljana Janicijevic and Suzana Topuzoski Institute of physics, Faculty of natural sciences and mathematics, University “Ss Cyril and Methodius”, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract In this article we investigate the Fresnel diffraction characteristics of the hybrid optical element which is a combination of a spiral phase plate (SPP) with topological charge p and a thin lens with focal length f, named the helical lens (HL). As incident a Gaussian laser beam is treated, having its waist a distance from the HL plane and its axis passing through the centre of the HL. It is shown that the SPP introduces a phase singularity of p-th order to the incident beam, while the lens transforms the beam characteristic parameters. The output light beam is analyzed in detail: its characteristic parameters and focusing properties, amplitude and intensity distributions and the vortex rings profiles and radii, at any z distance behind the HL plane, as well as in the near and far field. 1. Introduction The optical elements with embedded phase patterns in their phase transmission functions have attracted an increased interest because they produce optical vortex beams [1, 2]. The optical vortex beams or optical vortices possess screw dislocations on their wavefronts, where the phase is nondefined, and accordingly, the wave amplitude and intensity are equal to zero. Due to its helicoidal phase wavefront around the singular axis, the optical vortex beam carries orbital angular momentum (OAM) along its propagation axis [3]. The OAM was shown to be proportional to the topological charge (TC) number of the beam.
    [Show full text]