DOCSLIB.ORG

2012 Georgia Wild Pig Survey Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012 Georgia Wild Pig Survey Final Report 2012 Georgia Wild Pig Survey Final Report Michael T Mengak, PhD, CWB©, Professor-Wildlife Outreach Specialist, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA [email protected] 1 Revised 1 July 2015 Summary No matter what we call them, free-ranging hogs can be very destructive to forests, farms, orchards, crops, and timber plantations. A six-page questionnaire was developed during the summer/fall of 2011 with input from members of the Georgia Feral Hog Working Group. Questions were taken or adapted from existing similar wild pig surveys recently completed in other southern states. A total of 1200 surveys were delivered to randomly selected recipients and 471 useable surveys were returned. This yielded a response rate of 39.25%. Most respondents reported having wild hog damage to land they farm and that the damage was first noticed more than five years ago. The cumulative impact of multiple years of damage can take a substantial toll -financial and emotional - on the landowner or agricultural producer. This burden is addressed throughout the survey. The most common type of damage was from rooting and grubbing. Peanuts, corn, and cotton were the crops most frequently reported damaged. Respondents were asked to self-report a dollar amount of damage to crops or crop related damage and damage to items other than crops. Respondents (N=177) reported an average loss to crops and/or crop related damage (e.g., damage to equipment, etc.) due to wild pigs during 2011 of $10,163 per respondent (Range $100 - $100,000). The total losses reported by respondents during 2011 were $1,798,800. Expanding this to the southwest Extension District (41 counties) results in an estimated amount of wild pig damage to crops and/or crop related damage in excess of 40 million dollars ($40,803,927). Respondents (N=120) reported an average loss to items other than crops (e.g., timber, food plots, lease values, etc.) due to wild pigs during 2011 of $5,381 per respondent (Range $25 - $100,000). The total non-crop losses reported by respondents during 2011 were $645,775. Expanding this figure to the region reveals an estimated amount of wild pig damage to non-crop values in excess of $20 million dollars ($20,658,772). Together losses due to wild pigs reportedly exceeded 61 million dollars in 2011. Respondents felt that most control measures were not highly effective and that state and federal agencies should provide more assistance with wild pig control. Questions related to knowledge, opinions and attitudes about wild pigs revealed that survey participants differed in their knowledge of wild pigs but generally opinions about the animal were negative and the perceived need for control was widespread. Clearly, there is much need for additional educational outreach concerning wild pigs. As indicated by responses to questions throughout this survey, the origin, disease risk, ecological role, and effective control methods of wild pigs are all areas in need of additional educational efforts. Future research could be directed at the impact of wild pigs on other game species. Many respondents perceived a decline in white-tail deer, wild turkey, and northern bobwhite and attributed this decline, at least partially, to the abundance and activity of wild pigs. 2 Introduction Feral hogs (Sus scrofa) are not native to United States. Most authorities believe they were first introduced by the Spanish in the mid-1500. Many hogs present in our forests and fields today are descendants of farm animals turned loose from family farms during the Depression and early part of the 20th century. Other feral hogs originated from animals intentionally released for stocking and hunting opportunities - a practice that is generally illegal throughout most of the South. Some stock is reported to be imported from Europe - so called Photo 1. Sounder of wild pigs “Russian Boars” or “Russian Wild Hogs.” All pigs (or hogs) are the same species and there is no biological difference between farm pigs, wild boars, or feral hogs. Farm pigs will revert to the natural color, size, and attitude of “wild boars” within a few short generations. They will be generically referred to as wild pigs in this report. No matter what we call them, free-ranging wild pigs can be very destructive to forests, farms, orchards, crops, and timber plantations. They can also be a challenging animal to hunt and are pursued by many big game hunters throughout the southeastern US. Wild pigs are reported to occur in 38 states. In most cases, they cause significant financial and ecological damage. They carry important diseases that may be transmitted to hunters, domestic livestock and pets. In a recent study in the journal Human-Wildlife Interactions, swine brucellosis was reported in up to 14% of animals tested with highest occurrence of infected animals in South Carolina, Alabama, and Hawaii. Physical descriptions of wild pigs and valuable information about their management, control, spread, ecology, and biology are available in recent publications. These are available from the Berryman Institute (www.berrymaninstiture.org/publications; Monograph No. 1 - Managing Wild Pigs: A Technical Guide); Mississippi State University Extension Service (http://msucares.com/pubs; Publication 2659 - A landowner’s guide for wild pig management); and the Warnell School Outreach Publication Library at the University of Georgia (http://www.warnell.uga.edu/outreach/pubs/wildlife.php). While information is easily available on the biology and ecology of wild pigs, less is known about their management, control, and impacts to farms, agricultural producers, and landowners. Few studies are available on public attitudes towards wild pigs and their presence in the environment. The objectives of this project were to use a statistically valid and reliable survey and methodology: 1 - to assess the extent of wild pig distribution in the Southwest Cooperative Extension District (SWED or “SW District”) of Georgia; 2 - to assess the damage (physical and economic) attributable to wild pigs in the SW District; and, 3 - to gather information on the opinions of landowners regarding the presence of wild pigs in the SW District. 3 Methods The Southwest Extension District of Georgia (http://extension.uga.edu/about/county/district.cfm?pk_id=114) includes 41 counties with headquarters in Tifton, GA. In the spring of 2011, district personnel - responding to numerous complaints and inquires for citizens, farmers, and landowners - contacted the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife Services (WS) office in Albany, GA seeking guidance on wild pig management. After several meetings, it was determined that a reasonable course of action would be to form the SW Georgia Wild Pig Working Group modeled after a similar group in South Carolina. The first Working Group meeting was held in June 2011 at Abraham Baldwin Agriculture College (ABAC) in Tifton, GA. Attendees Photo 2. Wild pig rooting damage to agriculture field in represented numerous wildlife management and agriculture interests southwest Georgia. including USDA-APHIS-WS, ABAC, State Veterinarian Office, GA Department of Natural Resources (GaDNR) - Wildlife Resources Division (WRD) and Law Enforcement (LE), University of Georgia - Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources (Warnell), Jones Ecological Research Center (Jones Center), and other agencies and organizations. Several approaches were outlined to address the growing problems that wild pigs were causing in the District. One approach was a research based survey to assess the extent and general nature of the problem. This survey was conducted by Dr. Michael T. Mengak, Professor - Wildlife Outreach Specialist at the Warnell School. The results of this survey are reported in this document. During the summer and fall of 2011, funds were raised from multiple partners to support the survey described in this report. Funding partners included the Georgia Farm Bureau, the Georgia Peanut Commission, the Georgia Cotton Commission, the Warnell School at UGA, the office of the Associate Dean of Extension- College of Agriculture and Life Science, UGA, the Georgia Forestry Association, and the Quality Deer Management Association. Additional support was received from the SW District of the UGA Cooperative Extension Service, USDA Wildlife Services, the Jones Ecological Research Center, and the Southern Extension Forester. The SW District provided access to their databases of names of producers, clients, landowners, farmers and citizen who had previously attended a Cooperative Extension Service educational program. The database was a MS Excel spreadsheet consisting of four separate parts with more than 17,000 names and addresses. The four parts were merged; duplicates and businesses were deleted resulting in a useable database of over 12,000 names. From this list, 1,300 names and addresses were randomly chosen using the random number generator in the MS Excel spreadsheet. In addition, the Jones Center supplied a database of their cooperating landowners (approximately 140 names). From the Jones Center list, 37 names and addresses were randomly chosen in the same manner and the two lists were combined to form a single list of 1,337 names and addresses. 4 A six-page questionnaire was developed during summer/fall 2011 with input from members of the SW Georgia Wild Pig Working Group. Questions were taken from similar wild pig surveys recently completed in Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana. In addition, questions were taken from a recent survey of Georgia residents regarding attitudes towards black bears in Georgia. All questions were modified (re-written or re-phrased) to apply to Georgia and to wild pigs. Members of the working group task force on research reviewed the questions, suggesting changes and additional questions. The Farm Bureau and two commissions commented on early drafts of the questionnaire. The SW District Cooperative Extension Service also reviewed the questions. Experts in survey research also provided input in the survey design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Blind Men Describe “Bloody Good
    Frame — a re-enactment of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Twenty-two seconds of footage of the as- sassination, taken in Dallas in 1963 by Abra- ham Zapruda, was sold to Life magazine on the night of the shooting for $150,000. Life published stills from the film shortly after- wards. (Later, the Zapruda family would be paid $10 million by the US government for rights to the film). Stills were also re- produced in the Warren Commission Report of September 1964. The Warren Commis- sion also used the film as the basis for a se- ries of reconstructions that served as part of their investigation. The film itself was not broadcast until 1975. Perhaps more than any other, this moving image defined the turbu- lence of the 1960s for a wide American public during the 1970s. Don Delillo’s 1997 novel Underground cap- tures the sense of this moment in a fictional TIME account of one of the film’s first public, or semi-public, viewings in the summer of 1974. CAPTCHA’D The scene takes place in an apartment with television sets in every room. In each room a video of the same piece of footage plays, FOR GLOBAL with a slight delay. Delillo writes: “The event was rare and GOOD? strange. It was the screening of a bootleg copy of an eight-millimeter home movie that ran for twenty seconds. A little over twenty PALO ALTO — In 2002, Stanford Univer- seconds probably. The footage was known as sity launched a “community reading project” the Zapruda film and almost no one outside called Discovering Dickens, making Dickens’s the government had seen it.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Riddle-Makers Have Hidden Behind the Fire of a Dragon
    Volume 38 Number 2 Article 7 5-15-2020 What the Riddle-Makers Have Hidden Behind the Fire of a Dragon Laurence Smith Independent Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Laurence (2020) "What the Riddle-Makers Have Hidden Behind the Fire of a Dragon," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 38 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol38/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Classical mythology, folklore, and fairy tales are full of dragons which exhibit fantastic attributes such as breathing fire, hoarding treasure, or possessing more than one head. This study maintains that some of these puzzling phenomena may derive from riddles, and will focus particularly on some plausible answers that refer to a real creature that has for millennia been valued and hunted by man: the honeybee.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of the Honey Bee in Western Art
    Dominican Scholar Master of Arts in Humanities | Master's Liberal Arts and Education | Graduate Theses Student Scholarship May 2019 The Iconography of the Honey Bee in Western Art Maura Wilson Dominican University of California https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2019.HUM.06 Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Wilson, Maura, "The Iconography of the Honey Bee in Western Art" (2019). Master of Arts in Humanities | Master's Theses. 6. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2019.HUM.06 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberal Arts and Education | Graduate Student Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Arts in Humanities | Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This thesis, written under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor and approved by the department chair, has been presented to and accepted by the Master of Arts in Humanities Program in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts in Humanities. An electronic copy of of the original signature page is kept on file with the Archbishop Alemany Library. Maura Wilson Candidate Joan Baranow, PhD Program Chair Joan Baranow, PhD First Reader Sandra Chin, MA Second Reader This master's thesis is available at Dominican Scholar: https://scholar.dominican.edu/humanities- masters-theses/6 i The Iconography of the Honey Bee in Western Art By Maura Wilson This thesis, written under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor and approved by the program chair, has been presented to an accepted by the Department of Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Humanities Dominican University of California San Rafael, CA May 2019 ii iii Copyright © Maura Wilson 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouroboros Has a Head, Tail and Body
    Ouroborum: Transfiguration of the Labyrinth by J. Eric Morales Oregon College of Art and Craft Pacific Northwest College of Art Master of Fine Arts Degree in Applied Craft and Design May 19, 2011 Practicum Committee: JP Reuer, Chairman Joe Biel Anne Marie Oliver Nandini Ranganathan Abstract Embracing the archetype of the labyrinth in both form and concept, the work presented functions as an artistic exploration of the landscape between opposites such as interior / exterior; personal / universal; logical / emotional; matter / space. is project is a labyrinth. is text and presentation are also labyrinthine. Departing from the drawing technique he calls Labyrinthine Projection, the author details his process and the background influences behind the work. e work generally does not represent the typical or classic labyrinth model, though clearly labyrinthine in nature. But like the labyrinth, this work is formulaic because it subscribes to a very rigid set of constraints. Unlike the labyrinth, the work functions best through its meandering rather than a prescribed form. It is an aesthetic that can change character as a function of the viewer’s proximity to the work, or when employed as form versus decoration. is graduate level exploration culminates in an installation of three works. Each finished work was chosen for its representative quality of either art, craft, or design. e installation as a whole represents any successful creative endeavor which must satisfactorily unify these three modes. I consider these modes as indispensable and integral components to the full creative expression, just as the Ouroboros has a head, tail and body. Morales 1 Contents Project Statement 2 Background Influences 3 Work and Process 39 Conclusions 53 List of Illustrations 56 Works Referenced 60 copyright © 2011 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcements April 2017
    April 2017 Announcements CBSG eUpdate: April 2017 2017 CBSG Annual Meeting The 2017 CBSG Annual Meeting will be hosted by Berlin Zoo Contributors: Onnie Byers, Bob Lacy, Caroline Lees, in Berlin, Germany from 12-15 October 2017. We will send Phil Miller, Fabiana Lopes Rocha, Jorge Rodríguez registration information as soon as it is available. Thanks to our translators, Jean-Luc Berthier and Elizabeth Townsend (French), and Celia Sánchez (Spanish), for Call for Nominations for the 2017 Ulysses S. Seal helping make this publication available in three languages. Award for Innovation in Conservation Ulysses S. Seal’s great passion and talent was his creative thinking about how new science could be most effectively applied to solving the problems of wildlife conservation. CBSG has chosen to honor Ulie, the founder and first Chair of Visit us at http://www.cbsg.org CBSG, by creating the Ulysses S. Seal Award for Innovation In this issue: in Conservation, and we invite you to nominate for this year’s Announcements .......................................................1 award an individual who has made innovative, creative Harpy Eagle in Brazil Workshop .............................. 2 contributions to conservation science. Nominations are due 1 Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Planning ....................... 2 August 2017. Native Bee Conservation in Costa Rica ................... 3 Please visit http://www.cbsg.org/ulysses-s-seal-award- Mexican Wolf Project Update ................................... 3 nomination-form to download the nomination form, which Planning in the SSC and Creative Thinking ............. 4 contains further details about how and where to submit your SCTI Update ............................................................ 4 nomination. New Publications ..................................................... 5 Announcing CBSG’s New Book, Second Nature CBSG is proud to share Second Nature, a book featuring ten success stories about what is possible when dedicated people who have a common purpose collaborate to save a threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Tour “B+C” Kiskunság-Bükk Mountains-Lake Tisza- Hortobágy-Zemplén Mountains (7 Day, 6 Nights)
    Hungarianbirdwatching.com Address: H-1214 Budapest, Rózsa u 9/b, Hungary Tel/Fax: +36-1-2768827 Email: [email protected] Spring tour “B+C” Kiskunság-Bükk Mountains-Lake Tisza- Hortobágy-Zemplén Mountains (7 day, 6 nights) During this 7-days (6 nights) tour we will visit 4 National Parks Kiskunság NP, Bükk NP, Hortobágy NP and Aggteleki NP(Zemplén) offering us the opportunity to see a great variety of habitats and birds. During birding we try to see the most characteristics birds of Hungary, the Great Bustard, Great White Egret, White Stork, various woodpeckers, Saker, Red-footed Falcon, Imperial and Lesser Spotted Eagle, warblers, Bee-eater, Roller, Pigmy Cormorant, Ferruginous Duck, Penduline Tit and Bearded Reedling, Eagle and Ural Owls and many other species. We also visit wonderful towns and villages, 3 Unesco World Heritage areas (Hollók ő village, Hortobágy and Tokaj) and historic castles in Eger and Boldogk őváralja. As an optional program we can visit Poroszló Ecocenter with the largest fresh-water aquarium of Europe. And of course we will taste prize-winning Hungarian wines and will enjoy the Hungarian cuisine. Zemplén Mountains (Day 5,6,7) Bükk Mountains (Day 2,3) Lake Tisza (Day 3) Hortobágy (Day 4,5) Kiskunság (Day 1) SERBIA 1 Hungarianbirdwatching.com Address: H-1214 Budapest, Rózsa u 9/b, Hungary Tel/Fax: +36-1-2768827 Email: [email protected] Day 1 Birding in Kiskunság Overnight Bükk, Noszvaj After checking out from the hotel, we will drive to Kiskunság to visit the National Park. Kiskunság like Hortobágy is a big “Pusta” (steppe) with grasslands, saline lakes, fishpond systems and in certain areas quicksand.
    [Show full text]
  • Bees and Bears – 4.10
    MAAREC Publication 4.10 In the mountainous and heavily wooded September 2014 areas of the Mid-Atlantic region, bears are a serious threat to beekeeping operations. Bears can do a great deal of damage to hives and equipment in a short period of time. Bee damage is most common in early spring and summer (April to June) when young adults come out of hibernation, but can also occur during October and November, when the colonies are slowing down reproduction, preparing for winter and have adequate stored honey. It is this time in the fall before bears enter hibernation dens that they are looking for a sweet and protein rich meal. They normally visit apiaries at night, smashing hives to get to the brood and honey and scattering frames and equipment around the apiary. Once bears locate an apiary, they return again and again. Destruction of beehives by bears is not new, but in recent years the problem has escalated. Black bears once ranged over the entire Mid-Atlantic region. Increased urbanization, cultivated acreage, and the trend toward monocultural agriculture have rapidly reduced both bee pasture and suitable bear habitat. Today, bears are mostly limited to wilderness areas but increasingly are appearing in subdivisions and outlying areas. The extensive use of herbicides and insecticides has reduced bee pasture and forced beekeepers to move their outyards into remote areas to avoid pesticide kills. Therefore, some of the safest/best bee forage is located in areas of high bear density. Most of the states in the Mid-Atlantic region have areas that have high bear populations per square mile, and bear population estimates based on bear kill records show an increase for all states in the Mid-Atlantic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Bee Identification Guide
    WisconsinWisconsin BeeBee IdentificationIdentification GuideGuide Developed by Patrick Liesch, Christy Stewart, and Christine Wen Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) The honey bee is perhaps our best-known pollinator. Honey bees are not native to North America and were brought over with early settlers. Honey bees are mid-sized bees (~ ½ inch long) and have brownish bodies with bands of pale hairs on the abdomen. Honey bees are unique with their social behavior, living together year-round as a colony consisting of thousands of individuals. Honey bees forage on a wide variety of plants and their colonies can be useful in agricultural settings for their pollination services. Honey bees are our only bee that produces honey, which they use as a food source for the colony during the winter months. In many cases, the honey bees you encounter may be from a local beekeeper’s hive. Occasionally, wild honey bee colonies can become established in cavities in hollow trees and similar settings. Photo by Christy Stewart Bumble bees (Bombus sp.) Bumble bees are some of our most recognizable bees. They are amongst our largest bees and can be close to 1 inch long, although many species are between ½ inch and ¾ inch long. There are ~20 species of bumble bees in Wisconsin and most have a robust, fuzzy appearance. Bumble bees tend to be very hairy and have black bodies with patches of yellow or orange depending on the species. Bumble bees are a type of social bee Bombus rufocinctus and live in small colonies consisting of dozens to a few hundred workers. Photo by Christy Stewart Their nests tend to be constructed in preexisting underground cavities, such as former chipmunk or rabbit burrows.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-2013 Carl Larsson: Sweden’S Most Beloved Artist
    TheTomten Catalog 2012-2013 CARL LARSSON: SWEDEN’S MOST BELOVED ARTIST Carl Larsson Enclosure Cards This gift enclosure pack contains 10 cards and envelopes (5 each of 2 designs), Esbjörn Doing his Homework and Karin at the Window. Blank inside. Size: 2.25" x 3" $5.95/pkg. CRD 660 Carl Larsson Postcard Book Carl Larsson 2013 Calendar A collection of Swedish artist Carl Larsson rendered charming scenes postcards to keep of his home in cheerful watercolors that document his Carl Larsson Cards or send. Many of family’s idyllic country life. Size: 13" x 12" This card pack contains 8 cards (and 8 envelopes), two each of four these images were designs, featuring Carl Larsson’s colorful paintings of children. $13.99 CAL 406 originally published in Larsson’s 1899 book, A Home. Blank inside. Size: 4.63" x 6" $12.95/box CRD 650 30 postcards. Size: 4.81" x 6.88" $9.95 ABK 406 # 150 # 151 # 152 # 153 # 154 Carl Larsson Bookmarks Size: 2.31" x 8.5" $1.25 each Home Through the Carl Larsson NOV 150 Crayfishing NOV 153 Britta & Cat Paintings of Carl Larsson Coloring Book NOV 151 Wash House NOV 154 Karin & Kersti In the design and decoration of their This 48 page coloring book has 22 NOV 152 Karin at Window countryside home, Carl and Karin images to color, with color pictures Larsson created a style which influ- of the original paintings for reference. Published with the National Museum ences Swedish design to this day. This Carl Larsson Cards book celebrates the virtues of home of Stockholm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ing Items Have Been Registered
    ACCEPTANCES Page 1 of 20 January 2008 LoAR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN REGISTERED: ÆTHELMEARC Ælfra Long. Device change. Per pale argent and lozengy argent and purpure, three domestic cats rampant contourny sable crowned Or. The submitter is a court baroness and thus entitled to display a coronet. The submitter’s previous device, Per pale argent and lozengy argent and purpure, three domestic cats rampant contourny sable, is released. Æsa Helgulfsdottir. Name and device. Per bend argent and sable, a flame azure and an arrow bendwise argent. Aquila Blackmore. Device change. Gules, on a lozenge ployé argent between in chief two coronets Or, a mullet sable, a bordure embattled argent. The submitter is a court baron and thus entitled to display a coronet. The submitter’s previous device, Argent, vetu ployé gules, a mullet sable within a bordure embattled argent, is retained as a badge. Beniamin Hackewode. Name and device. Vert, a wolf rampant contourny maintaining a halberd argent, in dexter chief a mullet Or. Brandubh Ó Donnghaile. Badge. (Fieldless) A drum bendwise argent. Catrijn van der Hedde. Device. Or, a dragon’s head cabossed sable and on a chief vert three triangles inverted Or. Éamonn mac Alaxandair. Name and device. Per bend sinister argent and Or, three dexter hands in bend sinister and a lion rampant gules, a bordure sable. As precedent notes: There was some concern whether this was too reminiscent of the Red Hand of Ulster, a prohibited charge in the SCA. It turns out that the Red Hand of Ulster was used as an augmentation, not as a main charge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bee and the Turtle: a Fable from Yasuní National Park
    TRAILS AND TRIBULATIONS TRAILS AND TRIBULATIONS 446 The bee and the turtle: a fable from Yasuní National Park A chance observation of an interaction between two very different species while exploring the Ecuadorean Amazon reminds Olivier Dangles and Jérôme Casas of the importance of natural history observations in develop- ing ecological theories. andering through the forests and along the rivers of WYasuní National Park (YNP) in the Ecuadorian Amazon is probably every naturalist’s dream. A few years ago, we made that dream a reality (Figure 1). As ecolo- gists with a broad interest in many theoretical and applied aspects of this discipline, we wanted to go to YNP to find inspiration for new ideas about the structure and function of a variety of organisms and their interactions. For many taxa – especially insects and other arthropods, which constitute the main model organisms of our research – one can see more species in a day’s walk in YNP than during a lifetime spent in temperate zones. YNP has the highest density of tree, mammal, amphibian, and insect species ever recorded on the planet (Bass et al. Figure 1. The authors, Olivier Dangles (left) and Jérôme Casas 2010). The numbers are staggering. In an area equal to that (right), during their field trip in Yasuní National Park. of about 34 football fields (25 hectares), one can find over 1100 species of trees – more than in the whole of the US and river. We had the privilege of seeing a family of the criti- Canada combined. Comparisons with similar plots in other cally endangered giant otter (only a handful of which tropical forests worldwide reveal that YNP has the highest remain in the park), but our most memorable experience density of tree diversity of any place on Earth.
    [Show full text]