DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Trafficking Efforts by Maureen Q

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Trafficking Efforts by Maureen Q Ending Modern-Day Slavery: Using Research to Inform U.S. Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts by Maureen Q. McGough NIJ study examines the challenges facing the criminal justice system when combating human trafficking. rafficking in persons is modern- Homeland Security’s Blue Campaign day slavery and exists in unites anti-human trafficking pro- Tvirtually every country in the grams and offers resources for law world — and the United States is no enforcement and the public to help exception.1 Almost 150 years after raise awareness and provide much- the 13th Amendment abolished slav- needed training.3 ery and involuntary servitude, there are still men, women and children Despite growing awareness of the enslaved into labor and commercial issue and an influx of resources from sexual exploitation in the U.S. (see such influential bodies as the United sidebar, “Understanding Modern- Nations and other intergovernmental Day Slavery,” on page 27). organizations, foundations, non- governmental organizations and the In recent years the worldwide U.S. government, the field is still human trafficking problem has hampered by its inability to measure attracted significant political and the size and scope of trafficking.4 social attention. Awareness-raising initiatives such as the United Nation’s The data used to estimate the Blue Heart Campaign2 encourage prevalence of human trafficking in involvement and action to fight the U.S. are lacking in scope and human trafficking on a global scale. quality at the federal, state and In the U.S., the Department of local levels.5 The lack of reliable 26 NIJ JOURNAL / ISSUE NO. 271 ■ FEBRUARY 2013 data and a dependence on inad- equate evidence have fueled “[The stories of human trafficking victims] remind disagreement among anti-human us what kind of inhumane treatment we are capable trafficking movements in this coun- try, and some researchers have of as human beings. They are living, breathing criticized the issue as unsubstanti- ated and estimates of the problem as reminders that the war against slavery dubious.6 Recent estimates of people trafficked into the U.S. each year, for remains unfinished.” example, have varied widely from a low of approximately 14,500 to a —U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, at the release of the U.S. State Department’s 7 high of approximately 50,000. 2012 Trafficking in Persons Report, June 19, 2012 Unfortunately, challenges also exist in gauging the effectiveness of the criminal justice system’s response. level.8 NIJ has funded a number of little to no freedom of movement.9 Rates of identification, investigation projects to improve data collection They restrict victims’ contact with and prosecution are of limited value and analysis of the issue. This article the outside world.10 Domestic ser- in determining the effectiveness of discusses one recent study that vants remain “invisible” in private U.S. responses to human trafficking looked specifically at the challenges homes, and private businesses can because the data supporting preva- facing state and local criminal justice serve as fronts for trafficking opera- lence estimates are unreliable. systems. tions.11 Many victims face language barriers that prevent them from seek- Research can play an invaluable ing help. Additionally, international role in understanding the criminal A Hidden Crime victims who enter the U.S. may be justice system’s ability to respond to The nature of human trafficking uncertain of their immigration status trafficking and in identifying obsta- helps keep this crime hidden. and thus less inclined to work with cles that hinder current efforts. The Captors often closely guard their authorities. need for robust research is all the victims, leaving them isolated with more pressing given restricted bud- gets and declining resources. At a time when governments increasingly are looking to use evidence-based Understanding Modern-Day Slavery practices, policymakers and practi- tioners are looking to the research community to produce the data needed to analyze the impact of ost countries banned “chattel slavery” — one person owning anti-trafficking efforts. Manother person as property — in the 1800s. Despite this, slav- ery continues in the modern day. Although owning slaves used to be a The problem can be cyclical — major investment formalized through legal documents, today’s slaves without accurate estimates of the are held through debt bondage, indentured servitude or other forms of prevalence of human trafficking, control. it can be difficult to know how to For more than a decade, the phrase “human trafficking” has been used allocate resources to study the to describe the act of holding a person in forced service — the very issue. The U.S. State Department’s definition of slavery. The term can cause confusion, however, because annual compendium of countries’ it implies that traffickers always transport victims across borders; in anti-human trafficking efforts, the actuality, victims can also be held in their own homes. Experts maintain Trafficking in Persons Report, rec- that when considering the issue of human trafficking, it is important to ognizes this data deficiency and do so in an accurate context — acknowledging that trafficking is mod- recommends that the U.S. improve ern slavery and that trafficked persons are slaves. the data and analysis of human traf- ficking cases at the state and local Ending Modern-Day Slavery: Using Research to Inform U.S. Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts | 27 NIJ JOURNAL / ISSUE NO. 271 ■ FEBRUARY 2013 Furthermore, victims, for a variety of reasons, do not always identify them- “[Human trafficking] ought to concern selves as such. Human trafficking victims suffer tragic psychological every person because it is a debasement of our trauma and may experience Stockholm syndrome, generating common humanity. It ought to concern every positive feelings and gratitude toward their captors for perceived favors or community because it tears at our social fabric. even for being allowed to live.12 Law enforcement commonly lacks train- It ought to concern every business ing to identify these signs of trauma, making it difficult for them to sever because it distorts markets. It ought the controlling bond that captors have over their victims and decreas- ing the likelihood that victims will to concern every nation because it cooperate.13 Even if victims identify themselves as such and are aware of endangers public health and fuels violence their rights, they still might hesitate to report their victimization out of and organized crime.” fear of reprisal from the trafficker, lack of trust in law enforcement or —President Barack Obama, fear of deportation.14 remarks at the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting, September 25, 2012 Challenges at the State and Local Levels of state and local law enforcement 12-site study that included in-depth Since the passage of the Trafficking personnel, 32 percent of respon- interviews with 166 practitioners Victims Protection Act in 2000, dents indicated that they identified from federal, state and local law 49 states have enacted legislation many of their human trafficking enforcement; state and federal pros- that criminalizes human trafficking cases when they were investigating ecutors; victim service providers; and and empowers state and local other crimes.17 other stakeholders. The researchers law enforcement — often the also analyzed data from 140 closed first responders to interact with Despite this increased involvement, human trafficking case files20 to victims — to investigate these reports show that fewer trafficking determine which characteristics of cases without depending on federal cases have been identified and human trafficking cases attract local authorities and to prosecute human prosecuted than would be expected law enforcement’s attention and trafficking cases in state courts.15 given current estimates.18 This predict adjudicatory outcomes.21 has led to speculation that either Although the study is not nationally Increased involvement of state incidents of human trafficking are representative, the findings can help and local law enforcement is criti- significantly overestimated or govern- us understand why the number of cal because they handle the bulk of ment officials and law enforcement human trafficking cases is lower criminal cases in the United States. agencies are not effectively confront- than estimates of the problem might Even before the passage of state ing the problem.19 predict. Here is what the researchers anti-trafficking legislation, federal law found: enforcement requested that state NIJ funded Amy Farrell and her and local officers “be the eyes and colleagues at Northeastern Identification challenges ears for [federal law enforcement in] University and researchers at the The study confirmed that identify- recognizing, uncovering and respond- Urban Institute to examine the chal- ing victims is particularly challenging ing to circumstances that may appear lenges facing state and local criminal because perpetrators hide and to be routine street crime, but may justice systems when investigating move their victims. The interviews ultimately turn out to be a human and prosecuting human trafficking also revealed that the cultural and trafficking case.”16 In fact, in a survey cases. The researchers conducted a 28 | Ending Modern-Day Slavery: Using Research to Inform U.S. Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts NIJ JOURNAL / ISSUE NO. 271 ■ FEBRUARY 2013 The Prevalence of Labor Trafficking in the United States n the NIJ-funded
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Trafficking in America's Schools
    Human Trafficking in AMERICA’S SCHOOLS 2015 JANUARY Human Trafficking in AMERICA’S SCHOOLS i This report was written under U.S. Department of Education Grant Number Q184L070139 by Jeneé Littrell of the Grossmont Union High School District. Eve Birge served as the grant monitor. This report was designed for the U.S. Department of Education under Contract Number EDESE12O0035 with American Institutes for Research, Inc. Rita Foy Moss served as the contracting officer’s representative for the National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments technical assistance center (NCSSLE). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the Department of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred. For the reader’s convenience, this publication contains information about and from outside organizations, including hyperlinks and URLs. Inclusion of such information does not constitute the Department’s endorsement. Office of Safe and Healthy Students David Esquith Director January 2015 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Healthy Students, Human Trafficking in America’s Schools, Washington, D.C., 2015. This report is available for free at http://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/human-trafficking-americas-schools. Availability of Alternate Formats Requests for documents in alternate formats such as Braille or large print should be submitted to the Alternate Format Center by calling 202.260.0852 or by contacting the 504 coordinator via email at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Smuggling in Asia
    Migrant Smuggling in Asia An Annotated Bibliography August 2012 2 Knowledge Product: !"#$%&'()!*##+"&#("&(%)"% An Annotated Bibliography Printed: Bangkok, August 2012 Authorship: United Nations O!ce on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Copyright © 2012, UNODC e-ISBN: 978-974-680-330-4 "is publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-pro#t purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations O!ce on Drugs and Crime. Applications for such permission, with a statement of purpose and intent of the reproduction, should be addressed to UNODC, Regional Centre for East Asia and the Paci#c. Cover photo: Courtesy of OCRIEST Product Feedback: Comments on the report are welcome and can be sent to: Coordination and Analysis Unit (CAU) Regional Centre for East Asia and the Paci#c United Nations Building, 3 rd Floor Rajdamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, "ailand Fax: +66 2 281 2129 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org/eastasiaandpaci#c/ UNODC gratefully acknowledges the #nancial contribution of the Government of Australia that enabled the research for and the production of this publication. Disclaimers: "is report has not been formally edited. "e contents of this publication do not necessarily re$ect the views or policies of UNODC and neither do they imply any endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons
    Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons Action Sheet 8 Liberty and Freedom of Movement Key message The ability to move freely and in safety within one’s country is a basic right as well as a pre-condition for the enjoyment of many other rights. Limitations on freedom of movement can have serious consequences for the lives, health and well-being of individuals and communities. Ensuring freedom of movement thus forms an important part of any protection strategy. 1. What do we mean by the term freedom of movement? Freedom of movement consists of the right and ability to move and choose one’s residence freely and in safety within the territory of the State, regardless of the purpose of the move. It also includes the right to leave any country and to return to one’s own country. It is closely related to the right to liberty and security of person, which guarantees freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention, and the right to seek asylum in another country. Taken together these rights mean that all persons, including the internally displaced, have the right to: l Take flight and seek safety in another part of the country (of choice), or to leave the country in order to seek asylum in another country. l Move freely and in safety within the country, including in and out of camps and settlements, regardless of the purpose of the move. l Voluntarily return to the place of origin or relocate to another part of the country. l Not be arbitrarily displaced or forced to return or relocate to another part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Movement of Workers – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of Residence – Derived Rights for Third-Country Nationals)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 May 2020 (Freedom of movement of workers – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of residence – Derived rights for third-country nationals) In Case E-4/19, REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in a case pending before it between Campbell and The Norwegian Government, represented by the Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda – UNE), concerning the interpretation of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC, and in particular Article 7(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof, THE COURT, composed of: Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen, and Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, Registrar: Ólafur Jóhannes Einarsson, having considered the written observations submitted on behalf of: Ms Campbell, represented by Anne-Marie Berg, Advocate; – 2 – the Norwegian Government, represented by Pål Wennerås, Advocate with the Attorney General of Civil Affairs, acting as Agent; the EFTA Surveillance Authority (“ESA”), represented by Ewa Gromnicka, Erlend Møinichen Leonhardsen and Carsten Zatschler, members
    [Show full text]
  • Orphanage Entrepreneurs: the Trafficking of Haiti's Invisible Children
    Protecting Children. Providing Solutions. Orphanage Entrepreneurs: The Trafficking of Haiti’s Invisible Children 2 Orphanage Entrepreneurs: The Trafficking of Haiti’s Invisible Children Authors Georgette Mulheir with Mara Cavanagh and colleagues. Contributors and researchers Eugene Guillaume, Jamie McMutrie, Ali McMutrie, Morgan Wienberg and Matthew Thomas. Orphanage Entrepreneurs: The Trafficking of Haiti’s Invisible Children 3 Contents Executive Summary 5 Purpose of this document 7 A forgotten history 7 The harm caused by institutionalisation 8 Violence and abuse in children’s institutions 9 Institutionalisation and trafficking 10 Definitions 11 Children in orphanages and institutions in Haiti 12 Trafficking in Haiti 13 The international and national legislative and policy framework 14 Research evidence on institutionalisation and trafficking of children in Haiti 15 Case evidence of trafficking children in institutions in Haiti 17 Patterns of abuse and trafficking in institutions 26 How to close an orphanage that is trafficking children 28 Outcomes of the Lumos intervention in three orphanages 30 Money: part of the problem and a possible solution 30 Faith-based funding and support of orphanages 34 Conclusions 35 Recommendations 36 4 Orphanage Entrepreneurs: The Trafficking of Haiti’s Invisible Children Orphanage Entrepreneurs: The Trafficking of Haiti’s Invisible Children 5 Executive summary An estimated 32,000 children live in orphanages in Haiti. More than 80% are not orphans. 80 years of research demonstrates the harm caused by raising children in institutions. As a result, most countries in the developed world moved away from this form of care decades ago. The Haitian government has prioritised reducing reliance on orphanage care, to ensure children can be raised in families.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Marriage & Modern Slavery
    FORCED MARRIAGE & MODERN SLAVERY Freedom Network USA Conference 5-6 April 2017 Washington D.C Laura Vidal National Projects Coordinator The Freedom Partnership-to End Modern Slavery Sydney, Australia [email protected] ABOUT THE SALVATION ARMY FREEDOM PARTNERSHIP- TO END MODERN SLAVERY The Freedom Partnership-to End Modern Slavery is the national response of The Salvation Army in Australia to respond to issues related to human trafficking, slavery and slavery-like practices. The Salvation Army in Australia has been undertaking this work for coming onto 10 years; having opened Australia’s only Safe House for victims in 2008. The work undertaken by The Freedom Partnership remains independent of the Australian Government. The Freedom Partnership: . Mobilises community to effectively identify and respond to modern slavery . Engages with government, business, corporations and consumers to uncover, mitigate and remediate slavery in production supply chains . Partners with local, state and territory governments that develop and implement localised responses . Empowers survivor advocates to contribute their expertise Since Forced Marriage was criminalised as a slavery-practice in 2013, The Freedom Partnership has expanded its work in this area to address Australia’s response and strengthen protections for individuals at risk. Including delivering in the following program areas: . Community outreach and training—assisting communities to identify and appropriately respond to disclosures of early and forced marriage . Confidential advice and technical assistance—to individuals and organisations facing early and forced marriage, including information about Australia’s response framework and making referrals for assistance . Supported accommodation and case management—via Australia’s only trafficking and slavery safe house .
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery Past and Present
    fact sheet Slavery past and present Right: Slaves being forced below What is Anti-Slavery International? deck. Despite the fact that many slaves were chained for the voyage it The first organised anti-slavery is estimated that a rebellion occurred societies appeared in Britain in the on one out of every eight slave ships 1780s with the objective of ending that crossed the Atlantic. the slave trade. For many people, this is the image In 1807 the British slave trade was that comes to mind when they hear abolished by Parliament and it the word slavery. We think of the became illegal to buy and sell buying and selling of people, their slaves although people could shipment from one continent to still own them. In 1833 Parliament another and the abolition of the finally abolished slavery itself, trade in the early 1800s. Even if we both in Britain and throughout know little about the slave trade, the British Empire. we think of it as part of our history rather than our present. In 1839 the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society was created, In fact, the slave trade continues to representing a new organisation for have an impact today. Its legacies the new chapter of the anti-slavery include racism, discrimination Mary Prince struggle. It gave inspiration to the and the development and under- abolitionist movement in the United development of communities and “Oh the horrors of slavery! - States and Brazil, and contributed countries affected by the trade. How the thought of it pains my to the drawing up of international And slavery itself is not a thing of heart! But the truth ought to standards on slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Trafficking: Issues Beyond Criminalization
    IA SCIEN M T E IA D R A V C M A PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SOCIALIVM ACTA 20 S A O I C C I I F A I T L I N V M O P Human Trafficking: Issues Beyond Criminalization The Proceedings of the 20th Plenary Session 17-21 April 2015 Edited by Margaret S. Archer | Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo Libreria Editrice Vaticana • Vatican City 2016 Human Trafficking: Issues Beyond Criminalization The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences Acta 20 The Proceedings of the 20th Plenary Session Human Trafficking: Issues Beyond Criminalization 17-21 April 2015 Edited by Margaret S. Archer Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo IA SCIE M NT E IA D R A V C M A S A I O C C I F I I A T L I N V M O P LIBRERIA EDITRICE VATICANA • VATICAN CITY 2016 The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences Casina Pio IV, 00120 Vatican City Tel: +39 0669881441 • Fax: +39 0669885218 Email: [email protected] • Website: www.pass.va The opinions expressed with absolute freedom during the presentation of the papers of this meeting, although published by the Academy, represent only the points of view of the participants and not those of the Academy. ISBN 978-88-86726-32-0 © Copyright 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, pho- tocopying or otherwise without the expressed written permission of the publisher. THE PONTIFICAL ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES LIBRERIA EDITRICE VATICANA VATICAN CITY In recent years, the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, thanks to the efforts of its President, its Chancellor and a num- ber of prestigious external collaborators – to whom I offer my heartfelt thanks – has engaged in important activities in defence of human dignity and freedom in our day.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersection Forced Marriage & Human Trafficking
    A PRIL Intersection 6, 2017 F 2017 6, Forced Marriage & Human Trafficking REEDOM NETWORK Moderator: Daliah Setareh Presenters: Casey Swegman USA Pooja Dadhania Laura Vidal 1. Identify forced marriage 2. Identify intersections between forced marriage and trafficking 3. Explore remedies for forced marriage 4. Discuss policies to protect forced marriage survivors and prevent forced marriage 5. Discuss the Australian model as a case study WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS? • Forced marriage is a form of violence against women in its own right. • Forced marriage is just one part of a spectrum of other harms. • Forced marriage cases can have elements of trafficking and human trafficking survivors may have experienced a forced marriage. FORCED MARRIAGE – STORY OF L. L. is a mother of two teenaged daughters. L.’s husband began to arrange marriages for his two daughters. L. and her daughters did not agree. When they challenged him, he isolated them and beat them. L. and her daughters fled, and are currently in hiding. FORCED MARRIAGE – STORY OF R. When R. was 15 years old, her mother borrowed money from an older family friend to support R. and her siblings. The family friend believed that R. was promised to him in return. He came to R.’s home multiple times, threatening to rape R. if she did not marry him. R. was terrified and escaped to the United States alone. FORCED MARRIAGE – STORY OF F. When she was 19, F.’s family arranged a marriage for her. She and her husband were not allowed to be alone before marriage. F.’s husband became abusive very soon after they married.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficking of Women and Children for Sexual Exploitation in the Americas
    Trafficking of Women and Children for Sexual Exploitation in the Americas Women, Health and Development Program Pan-American Health Organization Women, Health and Development Program Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation TRAFFICKING OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN FOR SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN THE AMERICAS prepared by Alison Phinney for the Inter-American Commission of Women (Organization of American States) and the Women, Health and Development Program (Pan American Health Organization) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………........... 1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK…………………………………………………………............ 1 TRAFFICKING IN THE AMERICAS........................................................................................... 3 TRAFFIKCING AND HUMAN RIGHTS............................................................................... 4 TRAFFICKING AND HEALTH.................................................................................................. 4 THE LEGAL CONTEXT........................................................................................................ 6 WHAT IS BEING DONE?..................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 9 Women, Health and Development Program Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation “We came to the United States to find a better future, not to be prostitutes. No woman or child would want to be a sex slave and endure the evil that I have
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Victims of Human Trafficking: What to Look for in a Healthcare Setting
    Identifying Victims of Human Trafficking: What to Look for in a Healthcare Setting Healthcare providers may come into contact with victims of human trafficking and have a unique opportunity to connect them with much needed support and services. Anyone in a healthcare setting may be in a position to recognize human trafficking – from clerical staff to lab technicians, nursing staff, ambulatory care, radiology staff, security personnel, case managers, and physicians. The following is a list potential red flags and indicators that medical providers may see in a patient who may be a victim of human trafficking. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. Each indicator taken individually may not imply a trafficking situation and not all victims of human trafficking will exhibit these signs. However, the recognition of several indicators may point to the need for referrals and further assessment. Red Flags and Indicators General Indicators of Human Trafficking Shares a scripted or inconsistent history Is unwilling or hesitant to answer questions about the injury or illness Is accompanied by an individual who does not let the patient speak for themselves, refuses to let the patient have privacy, or who interprets for them Evidence of controlling or dominating relationships (excessive concerns about pleasing a family member, romantic partner, or employer) Demonstrates fearful or nervous behavior or avoids eye contact Is resistant to assistance or demonstrates hostile behavior Is unable to provide his/her address Is not aware of his/her
    [Show full text]
  • Draft General Comment No. 37 (Right of Peaceful Assembly)
    www.icnl.org [email protected] PRESENTED TO UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE SUBMISSION Draft General Comment No. 37 (Right of Peaceful Assembly) Introduction ICNL is grateful for the opportunity to provide comments on the revised draft General Comment No. 37 on Article 21 (right of peaceful assembly) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Please find below principal comments relating to the following issues of general significance: (1) the definition of “assembly”; (2) assemblies through digital means; (3) authorization and notification requirements; (4) use of force in the context of assemblies; and (5) the fundamental nature of peaceful assembly rights. Accompanying these principal comments, we have attached a marked-up version of General Comment No. 37 which addresses the text of the Comment in greater detail, indicating proposed edits (including edits on a number of specific or technical issues not raised in our principal comments) and rationales for these edits. We hope the Committee will find these comments helpful in its review of the draft Comment. Principal Comments 1. THE DEFINITION OF “ASSEMBLY” The conception of “assembly” set forth in the draft General Comment, at paras. 4 and 13, is limited to gatherings of persons with a common expressive purpose in a publicly accessible place. In our view, this conception omits historically and currently important forms of assembly that require protection against restrictions, while also 1126 16th Street NW #400 Washington, DC 20036 2/21/2020 leaving insufficient room to encompass evolving and future forms of assembly. We would recommend clarifying that the protections of article 21 apply to gatherings where the participants intend to engage in important civic activities other than common expression; to gatherings in private, non-publicly-accessible places; and to gatherings “by persons,” in various forms, rather than “of persons”.
    [Show full text]