DOCSLIB.ORG

Campaign for Labour Party Democracy Archive Temporary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy Archive Temporary Campaign for Labour Party Democracy Archive Temporary Catalogue 1. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM minutes, 1990-1992 2. Labour Party National Policy Forum: consultation documents, 2002-2003 3. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.26 & 27, 1992 4. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.1-9, 1981-1985 5. Eastern Europe Solidarity Campaign: papers and correspondence, 1981-1982 6. Eastern Europe Solidarity Campaign: papers and correspondence, 1980-1981 7. Militant: papers, correspondence, cuttings and journals, 1978-1988 8. Reselection: papers, cuttings and correspondence, 1968-1977 9. Plant Report/First Past the Post: working party papers, 1992-1993 10. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes and papers, 1984-1985 11. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: secretary’s reports to the AGM, 1990-1993 12. Labour Left Liaison: minutes and papers, 1986 13. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: correspondence, 1983 14. Labour Party National Executive Committee: reports and papers, 2002 15. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: miscellaneous papers, 1981 16. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: miscellaneous papers, 1982-1983 17. Labour Party National Executive Committee: reports and papers, 2001 18. Labour Party National Executive Committee: policy and conference reports, 1987-1988 19. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.12-15, 1986-1988 20. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.21-23, 1990-1991 21. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.16-18, 1988-1989 22. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.23, 25-27, 1991-1992 23. Labour Party Commission of Enquiry: minutes, 1980 24. Labour Party: annual conference reports and agendas, 1992 25. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and other material for 1992 Labour Party Conference, 1992 26. Labour Party: press releases of speeches and various publications from1992 Labour Party Conference, 1992 27. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.31-34, 1996-1999 28. Typescript reports on Labour Party National Executive Committee meetings by Ann Black, Christine Shawcroft and others, 2000-2001 29. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, letters and papers, 1980 30. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers for Labour Party Conference, 1981 31. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers regarding constitutional amendments, 1981 32. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers and cuttings regarding Labour Party leadership and deputy leadership elections, 1981-1988 33. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers regarding special Labour Party conference at Wembley, 1981 34. Labour Party policy documents and National Executive Committee policy review papers, 1989-1993 35. Centre Left Grassroots Alliance: papers and correspondence, 2003-2005 36. Labour Reform/Centre Left Grassroots Alliance: papers and correspondence, 1999-2005 37. Centre Left Grassroots Alliance: papers and correspondence, 1998-1999 38. Miscellaneous papers and publications on electoral reform and Europe, 1990-2004 39. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: miscellaneous papers, 1976-1982 40. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Bulletin, No.27-29, 36, 1992-2001 41. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: secretary’s reports to the AGM, 1990-1991 42. Labour Party: leadership: papers and correspondence, 1976-1979 43. Labour Party: conference reports and papers, 1996 44. Labour Party: conference reports and papers, 1996 45. Papers regarding the Plant Report and the First Past the Post Campaign, 1991 46. Papers regarding the Plant Report and the First Past the Post Campaign, 1991 47. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 1990-1992 48. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 1992-1993 49. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 1994-1997 50. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 1998-2000 51. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 2001 52. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 2002 53. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 2003 54. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: minutes, 2004 55. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, notes and correspondence regarding regional conferences, 1985-1986 56. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM minutes, 1983-1991 57. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and cuttings regarding Chris Richardson and Nottingham East CLP, 1975 58. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and cuttings regarding expulsions in Newham South CLP and Reg Prentice, 1976 59. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and cuttings regarding expulsions in Newham South CLP and Reg Prentice, 1976 60. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers and correspondence regarding Councillor Martha Osamor and Haringey Council, 1989-1990 61. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers and correspondence regarding Edward Milne and Blyth CLP, 1970-1975 62. Typescript drafts on the Labour Party and the Common Market by Steve Boddington (n.d.) 63. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers and questionnaire to MPs on reselection, 1976 64. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and minutes, 1976 65. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1986 66. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1975- 1977 67. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Executive Committee minute and papers, 1981-1982 68. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, 1976 69. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, 1979 70. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, 1978 71. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, 1978 72. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars, 1978 73. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1998 74. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: miscellaneous circulars and newsletters, 1988-1990 75. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: Executive Committee minutes and papers, 2002- 2003 76. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: bulletin, No.19-20, 1990 77. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: ‘21st Century Party’, drafts and papers, 2000 78. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers for AGM, 2000 79. Labour Reform Group: correspondence and papers, 2004 80. Miscellaneous: Galloway (briefing/slander), MEP list, original briefings (Conference 1980, London, 1979-1980, 1983), Tribune, Newham Photo, Jeff Rooker, PR, Vauxhall Parliamentary applicants, Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory, 1976, Reilly suspension, 1973-1983 81. Labour Party NEC: policy review reports, 1989 82. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and circulars, 1980 83. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and circulars, 1980 84. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers, correspondence and circulars, 1980 85. Labour Party Black Sections: papers, correspondence and publications, 1985-1994 86. Labour Party Black Sections: papers, correspondence and publications, 1985-1994 87. Labour Party Black Sections: papers, correspondence and publications, 1985-1994 88. Labour Party NEC: minutes, 1981-1984 89. Labour Party Organisation Committee: minutes, 1983-1985 90. Labour Party NEC: minutes, 1985 91. Labour Party NEC: minutes, 1986-1987 92. Labour Party National Constitutional Committee: minutes, papers and correspondence, 1987-1988 93. Campaign Group of Labour MPs: minutes, papers and correspondence, 1987-1988 94. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars and correspondence, 1980 95. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: correspondence, 1979 96. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: correspondence, 1979-1980 97. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: correspondence, 1981 98. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: correspondence, 1982 99. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: circulars and papers, 1977-1979 100. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: papers and correspondence regarding witch- hunts in the Labour Party, 1984-1986 101. Labour Party: National Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1987-1988 102. Labour Party: National Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1987-1988 103. Labour Party: National Executive Committee minutes and papers, 1987-1988 104. Labour Party: National Constitutional Committee papers, 1986-1987 105. Labour Party: National Constitutional Committee papers, 1986-1987 106. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: accounts, 1981-1989 107. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: bulletins and newsletters from conferences and regional conferences, 1986-1987 108. Labour Left Liaison: minutes, papers and other material, 1988-1990 (APPLY TO ARCHIVIST) 109. Labour Left Liaison: minutes, papers and other material, 1988-1990 (APPLY TO ARCHIVIST) 110. Labour Left Liaison: minutes, papers and other material, 1988-1990 (APPLY TO ARCHIVIST) 111. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, resolutions and minutes, 2004 112. Campaign for the Reinstatement of Amir Khan and Kevin Scally: papers, minutes and correspondence, 1986 113. Campaign for the Reinstatement of Amir Khan and Kevin Scally: papers, minutes and correspondence, 1986 114. Hendon South Labour Party, Women’s Section News, 1984-1993 115. Eastern Europe Solidarity Campaign: bulletins and newsletters, 1979-1986 116. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, 1989 117. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, 1989 118. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, 1988 119. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, 1987 120. Campaign for Labour Party Democracy: AGM papers, 1986 121.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'
    Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour©s ©English problem© Article (Accepted Version) Robinson, Emily (2016) Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem'. Political Studies Review, 14 (3). pp. 378-387. ISSN 1478-9299 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61679/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Author’s Post-Print Copy Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem' Emily Robinson, University of Sussex ABSTRACT ‘Progressive patriots’ have long argued that Englishness can form the basis of a transformative political project, whether based on an historic tradition of resistance to state power or an open and cosmopolitan identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin
    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Mcdonnell Amendment': Labour's
    Thomas Quinn (University of Essex) From the Wembley Conference to the ‘McDonnell Amendment’: Labour’s Leadership Nomination Rules Abstract A recent change to the Labour Party’s nomination rules for leadership elections was the eighth such major modification of this brief clause in the party’s rule book since 1981. These changes have provided a barometer of factional conflict over this period and indicate the importance of gate- keeping powers in leadership selection. This paper recounts the history of these eight rule changes. It shows how the proportion of Labour MPs (and later MEPs) required to nominate candidates in leadership elections has oscillated markedly, as the left has tried to reduce it while centrists have sought to increase it. The most recent change in 2017, when the threshold was decreased to 10% of Labour MPs and MEPs, was a victory for the left. The paper argues that the changes to Labour’s nomination rules, while lower-key than the extension of voting rights from MPs to ordinary members, have been just as significant. Keywords Labour Party; leadership elections; nomination rules; Jeremy Corbyn; electoral college; one member- one vote This is the accepted version of the following article: Thomas Quinn, ‘From the Wembley Conference to the “McDonnell Amendment”: Labour’s Leadership Nomination Rules’, Political Quarterly (forthcoming). DOI: 10.1111/1467-923X.12489. 1 Introduction At the Labour Party conference of 2017, delegates voted to support a rule change recommended by the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) that reduced the nomination threshold for candidates in leadership elections. Previously, candidates contesting the leadership when the post was vacant, such as after the resignation or death of the previous leader, were required to collect nominations from 15% of the combined membership of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • How Conference Works a Guide for Delegates
    Labour Party Annual Conference 25 – 29 September Brighton 2021 How Conference Works A Guide for Delegates #LAB21 2 2021 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR OF THE CONFERENCE ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE Dear Colleague On behalf of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), I am delighted to congratulate you on becoming a delegate to Labour Party Conference 2021. Following the postponement of Annual Conference 2020 due to COVID-19 I am pleased that we are able to plan for an in person conference in 2021, the first with our new Leadership team of Keir Starmer MP and Angela Rayner MP. With many attending as a delegate for the first time, the CAC hope that this guide will help you to get the most from Conference. Please keep an eye out for the Delegate survey after conference and tell us what you think about this document, and the whole of the conference experience, and how it might be improved. For first-time delegates, this guide aims to provide an understanding of the structure of debates and the procedures adopted at Annual Conference, and for returning delegates it is an update on changes to how Conference works. I hope that you find it useful. In August, you will receive a number of conference reports by email. These are also available online at https://labour.org.uk/conference/at-conference/reports-for-conference-2021/ and can be requested in hard copy from [email protected]. Accessible versions of the documents are provided to those who have requested them from [email protected]. The Delegates report sets out the draft timetable and lists the business to be discussed along with details of the CLP constitutional amendments up for consideration by Conference this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum Campaigning - Current Campaigns ​
    Momentum Press pack Press pack 1 Contents Pg. 3 About Momentum - Who we are, what we do and a brief history ​ Pg. 5 Key statistics - Our membership, achievements, reach and impact ​ Pg. 8 Momentum campaigning - Current campaigns ​ Pg. 11 Case studies and quotes - From supporters to our critics ​ Pg. 13 Contact information - Momentum’s press team ​ Press pack 2 About us Who we are, what we do and a brief history Who we are Momentum is a people-powered, grassroots social movement working to transform the Labour Party and Britain in the interests of the many, not the few. What we do Momentum isn’t just an organisation - we’re a social movement, made up of tens of thousands of members who share a vision for a transformative Labour government. Momentum connects, mobilises and empowers ordinary people across the country. Together, we campaign locally and nationally to make our communities better, strengthen our rights and get Labour elected. Momentum offers networks, skill-shares and tech to strengthen our movement from the grassroots up. We support members to transform the Labour Party to be democratic and member-led. From Jeremy Corbyn’s successful leadership election, to Labour’s extraordinary electoral comeback in the 2017 general election, Momentum members are central to Labour’s success. A brief history Momentum might be a young organisation, but we’ve achieved a lot. Our members and supporters up and down the country are transforming the Labour Party and Britain for the better. The real story of Momentum is made up of the hundreds of thousands of small actions taken by grassroots members across the UK, but here are the major milestones in our growth and development since our establishment in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth
    University of Huddersfield Repository Webb, Michelle The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth Original Citation Webb, Michelle (2007) The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/761/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LABOUR LEAGUE OF YOUTH Michelle Webb A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield July 2007 The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth Abstract This thesis charts the rise and fall of the Labour Party’s first and most enduring youth organisation, the Labour League of Youth.
    [Show full text]
  • US Right Still Strong After 3 Nov Election SOCIALIST POLITICS
    Solidarity& Workers’ Liberty For social ownership of the banks and industry US Right still strong after 3 Nov election SOCIALIST POLITICS CAN BEAT Pic: bit.ly/mraf-16 TRUMPISMSee pages 2-5 Special lockdown Vaccine, lockdowns, Students organise Green is more than subs offer capitalism towards January low-carbon Get six issues of Solidarity Latest on the pandemic, Rent strikes and plans for How much climate- by mail for £2: plus how capitalism the next term change is already “locked workersliberty.org/sub pushes pandemics in”? More on page 14 Pages 10-11, 16-18, 20 Page 19 Pages 6-7 No. 571, 11 November 2020 50p/£1 workersliberty.org Socialist politics can undercut Trumpism agitation against “socialism”, they ran scared of any clear message about changing society. They rejected more radical proposals (such as Medicare for All) and said little Editorial about less radical ones they supported on paper (a lim- ited public healthcare option). he Democratic establishment cannot comprehend US socialists and left-wingers argue that this vacuum “Twhat will happen after Biden is elected. We are not of positive vision and policies limited the possibilities for going back to business as usual. There is too much pain mobilising a mass movement or eroding Trumpism’s ap- out there, too much inequality, too much injustice. If we peal. cannot begin to address the crises facing this country, While Trump lost, he increased both his vote total then the future will be very, very dismal indeed. The peo- and his percentage share. He consolidated his support ple are giving us an opportunity now; if we blow it by not among white people (men, especially, in households on being bold and aggressive, the next Trump who comes over $100,000 a year but with little formal education) in along will be even worse than this one” — Senator Bernie smaller towns, and startlingly made some inroads among Sanders.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 16TH FEBRUARY, 2020 REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP Shadow Business Secr
    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 16TH FEBRUARY, 2020 REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP Shadow Business Secretary AM: Rebecca Long-Bailey is the Left’s chosen candidate to be Labour’s next Leader. Her campaign is confident she can overtake the current front runner, Sir Keir Starmer, and therefore one day become our Prime Minister. And she is my final guest this morning. Welcome Rebecca Long Bailey. RLB: Morning, Andrew AM: Now I know you don’t like being described as the continuity Corbyn candidate, but Jeremy Corbyn [indistinguishable] only last month at a meeting said this: “It’s an absolute pleasure to be here alongside Becky Long Bailey, our candidate for Leader.” Was that unhelpful? RLB: Not unhelpful. I mean Jeremy and myself are friends, but it’s quite disrespectful sometimes when I’m termed the ‘continuity’ candidate. I’ve always been strong to my principles; everybody knows what I believe in and I’ll never deviate from that, but I’m very much my own person and to suggest I’m a continuation of any individual is quite disrespectable- disrespectful, not least because I’m a woman, quite frankly. AM: It may not be about gender but about politics, because by ‘our candidate’ did he not mean that you were the candidate of the Socialist Campaign Group which includes - RLB: Well, I am AM: Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, Diane Abbott and you and Richard Burgon. RLB: I am the candidate of the Socialist Campaign Group, but I’m also the candidate of various trade unions and indeed a number of constituency parties who’ve nominated me.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Recapturing Labour's Traditions? History, Nostalgia and the Re-Writing
    Recapturing Labour’s Traditions? History, nostalgia and the re-writing of Clause IV Dr Emily Robinson University of Nottingham The making of New Labour has received a great deal of critical attention, much of which has inevitably focused on the way in which it placed itself in relation to past and future, its inheritances and its iconoclasm.1 Nick Randall is right to note that students of New Labour have been particularly interested in ‘questions of temporality’ because ‘New Labour so boldly advanced a claim to disrupt historical continuity’.2 But it is not only academics who have contributed to this analysis. Many of the key figures associated with New Labour have also had their say. The New Labour project was not just about ‘making history’ in terms of its practical actions; the writing up of that history seems to have been just as important. As early as 1995 Peter Mandelson and Roger Liddle were preparing a key text designed ‘to enable everyone to understand better why Labour changed and what it has changed into’.3 This was followed in 1999 by Phillip Gould’s analysis of The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party, which motivated Dianne Hayter to begin a PhD in order to counteract the emerging consensus that the modernisation process began with the appointment of Gould and Mandelson in 1983. The result of this study was published in 2005 under the title Fightback! Labour’s Traditional Right in the 1970s and 1980s and made the case for a much longer process of modernisation, strongly tied to the trade unions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Robin T. Pettitt Is Senior Lecturer in Comparative Politics at Kingston University - London
    Dr. Robin T. Pettitt is Senior Lecturer in Comparative Politics at Kingston University - London. His main area of research is the internal life of political parties. 1 The ‘How’ of Election Manifestos in the British Labour Party: A source of ongoing controversy Introduction The organisational history of the British Labour Party is to a significant degree the story of an ongoing struggle over the ‘how’ of election manifestos, a struggle, somewhat ironically, partly driven by a broad based agreement over the ‘why’ of manifestos. British political parties and indeed British politics more widely, are programmatic – that is, based on the idea that election manifestos are a party’s plan for government. What is says in the manifesto is what the party will do in government, and anything less, or indeed more, becomes a source of criticism of that government. Because the manifesto is seen as a programme for government action, this also means that the answer to the ‘how’ takes on huge importance, because controlling the ‘how’ means controlling government action. In the Labour Party the answer to the ‘how’ question has been the source of a longstanding and often heated dispute. On the one hand there are those who believe that the party’s parliamentary leadership must control the ‘how’. The parliamentary party is responsible to the electorate and has to answer for their actions at election time. They should therefore have the main say in the policies they will have to defend at a general election. On the other hand, the parliamentary party is only there because of the work of the grassroots, who selected them as candidates, campaigned for them on the doorstep, and therefore have a right to influence what they do.
    [Show full text]
  • Do As I Did Not As I Say : Blair, New Labour and Party Traditions
    This is a repository copy of Do as I did not as I say : Blair, New Labour and party traditions. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/153220/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Pike, K. and Hindmoor, A. orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-2509 (2020) Do as I did not as I say : Blair, New Labour and party traditions. The Political Quarterly, 91 (1). pp. 148-155. ISSN 0032-3179 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12791 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: PIKE, K. and HINDMOOR, A. (2020), Do As I Did Not As I Say: Blair, New Labour and Party Traditions. The Political Quarterly, 91: 148-155, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12791. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
    [Show full text]