DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 176, Spring, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No. 176, Spring, 2001 No 176 Spring 2001 40p Newspaper of the Spartacist League .;:;:;::::::::::::::.: .... No vote to Labour: imperialist butchers! For four years the Labour government has proven to be an effective instrument for administering British imperialism. As in the rest of Europe, social democrats Economist have spearheaded the dismantling of the "welfare state"; Blair, Jospin, Schroder destroy by neglect the legitimacy of the etc have been serving their imperialist Government that's been elected" (Times, masters well, dishing out all-round at­ 23 March). tacks on the working class and whipping Enter the Socialist Alliance (SA) up racist hysteria. With the Tories in which claims it marks "the most serious disarray, Blair's New Labour is again the socialist challenge to the Labour Party in preferred party of government for the more than a generation". The SA is ruling class. dominated by the reformist Socialist Following capitalist counterrevolution Workers Party (SWP) with other fake­ in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Trotskyist outfits in tow Sllch as Workers Europe, which wreaked economic and Power, the Alliance for Workers Liberty, social devastation, rivalries between the Socialist Outlook and the Socialist Party. imperialist powers have sharpened. With One look at its election programme, the world capitalist economies teetering Peter Macdiarmid which from start to fmish is pure reform­ on the brink of a major recession, passed draconian legislation to enforce tests were initiated by petty-bourgeois ist drivel such as "Tax the rich to rebuild rivalries will escalate over the long­ all of the above. Meanwhile, economic farmers and hauliers, we called for a the welfare state", purely within the sought-after prize - the restoration of depression and the attendant growth in tanker drivers strike which could have confines of capitalism and within the capitalism in China. Labour was the unemployment create a breeding ground transformed the massively popular pro­ shores of Britain, makes clear that their most bellicose of the NATO govern­ for fascism. Labour and Tory politicians tests into a mighty class battle against goal is to pressure Labour to reform ments during the Balkans War, which have whipped up racism to the point the hated Labour government. More capitalism. We say: No vote to the So­ had nothing to do with protecting the where the Council of Europe berated recently, the multiethnic workforce of cialist Alliance! Despite their pretensions Kosovo Albanians and everything to do them for creating a "xenophobic and London Underground has staged one­ to being a socialist alternative, they are with establishing a NATO imperialist intolerant" climate and murderous at­ day strikes against privatisation which not opposed to New Labour. The SWP's presence in the region. Labour joins with tacks against blacks, Asians and other brought the city to a standstill. line in areas where the SA do not have a US imperialism in bombing Iraq; like­ minorities are commonplace. Outra­ Blair wants to remodel Labour as an candidate (ie the vast majority of seats) wise Blair supports Bush's military geously, Britain's Chinese population openly bourgeois party along the lines of is: "Our approach in the coming election machinations against the Chinese de- has been scapegoated by the government the Democratic Party. Its support among should be 'vote Socialist where you can, . formed workers state, including "Star for the foot-and-mouth epidemic . workers has fallen dramatically and the vote Labour where you must' " (Interna­ Wars" missile defence. We say: Defend However, there are clear signs that the Labour "left" is defunct. Tony Benn, tional Socialism, Spring 2001). The So­ China against imperialist attack! working class across Europe has had leader of the Labour "left" for decades, cialist Alliance are pimps for Tony Blair, The infrastructure of British capitalist enough. The current wave of class strug­ now retiring, is worried that in the midst seeking to channel the heartfelt anger of society is crumbling: it is unsafe to eat gles in France is a clear example and in of aftger and disaffection among work­ workers, youth and minorities back into the food and dangerous to travel on the Britain last year's fuel blockade put the ers, youth and minorities, illusions in the rotten mould ofparliamentary poli­ trains. Labour's record includes British widely despised Labour government on parliamentarism have been eroded. As a tics and to refurbish Labour's image. Army rampage in Northern Ireland; the ropes. We supported the blockades parting shot to parliament (in addition to We also say no vote to the Scottish privatisation schemes for the health and the demand for lower fuel prices, saying "I love the place") he said: "The Socialist Party (SSP) who have joined service, London Underground and air which is in the direct interest of workers, real danger to democracy is not that forces with the Socialist Alliance to form traffic control; mass sackings and plant while by and large the pro-Labour "left" someone will bum Buckingham Palace a Britain-wide campaign. While the closures; tuition fees for students. In quaked in fear of this protest against and run up the Red Flag but people SA's campaign is restricted to England anticipation of resistance they have "their" government. Although the pro- won't vote. If people don't vote they continued on page 2 expropriate the capitalist class and begin mean by revolution. There are revolu­ adorning the statue of Winston Churchill Labour ... the implementation of a collectivised and tions going on - there's a revolution in . with a mohican hairdo, which sent Tory (Continued from page 1) rationally planned economy could not be education, the Internet revolution, a and Labour politicians ballistic. The more compelling. The issues which shopping revolution - we want to see denizens of the Socialist Alliance were and Wales, the SSP intends to stand in propel workers and youth into strug­ society reorganised, we want to revolu­ otherwise engaged, electioneering for all 72 Scottish constituencies. Together gle - racism, de-industrialisation, impe­ tionise society"! These latter-day Labour Ken Livingstone who, true to form, fully the SA and SSP will present candidates rialist bombing, increasing poverty­ "lefts" act1,1ally manage to make "Old backed the massive police operation in roughly 25 per cent of all Westminster cannot be resolved within the framework Labour" parliamentarians look flaming mobilised against the demonstrators. seats. The SSP is a thoroughly refonnist, of capitalism, nor within the confmes of pink! Polly Toynbee aptly captured the And today, although the SWP goes abso­ parliamentarist party, identical in most Britain itself. Our perspective is ali inter­ measure ofthese housetrained Labourites lutely ga-ga over demonstrations against respects to the components of the Social­ national one. We seek to mobilise work­ when she wrote that their "real aim is to so-called "globalisation" in Seattle, ist Alliance except that where the ers in a fight for their class interests, shift Labour policies" (Guardian, 2 Washington, Prague, Nice and Genova, English-based groups capitulate to La­ transcending national boundaries. This March). London's MayDay 2000 doesn't rate a bour, the SSP adapts to the bourgeois means mobilising' the working class in The Socialist Alliance's gross capitu­ mention, because it was anti-Labour. Scottish National Party, who have been opposition to all forms of Labourism. lation to their own bourgeoisie is crystal The SWP's purpose in orienting towards steadily gaining ground at the expense of At the press conference launching the clear: consciously removing any hint of "anti-capitalist" mobilisations is to sink Labour in Scotland. Socialist Alliance election campaign on opposition to British troops in Northern their parIiamentarist Labourite hooks We said no vote to Labour in 1997, I March we asked a few questions which Ireland; refusing to oppose the bombing into radical youth. Their Labourism does unlike all the groups who now form the embarrassed the assembled "socialists". of Serbia, the biggest military conflagra- not sit well with many youth who cer- Socialist Alliance. And again we say: No Noting that the call for withdrawal of vote to Labour, imperialist butchers! The British troops from Northern Ireland and Spartacist LeaguelBritain, section of the from the Balkans had appeared in an International Communist League, fights earlier draft programme but had disap­ for the construction of an internationalist peared from the version distributed to the revolutionary party to lead a revolution bourgeois press, our comrade asked if which will overthrow the archaic this was because it was controversial "United" Kingdom, dominated by south­ within the Alliance, or just not consid­ DOWN WITH ern England finance capital and served ered important. SA chairman Dave by "Her Majesty's" parliament. The Nellist of the Socialist Party refused to 'I\RIHjH/li5 strategic task of revolutionaries is to answer, even when pressed by Guardian break the working class politically from journalist Polly Toynbee, saying the MtUIAU5T the grip of Labour and from all illusions issue had not been decided. Needless to Ufai{ Sft1£IM:; in obtaining a better deal through parlia­ say their "priority policies for the general ment. Throughout the last century these election" do not mention British troops, if lRAU! illusions, particularly when passed off as or Ireland. And as for Serbia, it's a case "socialist" policies by Labour "lefts", of "don't mention the war". have fettered the working class in every When asked if their brand of "social­ decisive confrontation with the British ism" can be achieved without a revolu­ ruling class. tion, Nellist tried to dodge the question, Workers Hammer The case for workers revolution to then sputtered: "it depends what you February 20: Spartacus Youth Group campus protest as US/Britain bomb Iraq. tion in Europe since W orId War II; they tainly didn't join the SWP to find them­ also refuse to defend China against im­ selves telling workers to vote for Blair, The fight for the dictatorship of perialism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Tímto Stvrzuji, Že Jsem Tuto Disertační Práci Vypracoval Samostatně A
    Tímto stvrzuji, že jsem tuto disertační práci vypracoval samostatně a uvedl jsem veškerou použitou literaturu. V Praze dne 22.4.2013 3 4 Acknowledgements My involvement at the Future of European Welfare Systems, a European-wide research group led by Klaus Schubert helped me to become familiar with key scholarly debates in the field of comparative welfare systems. Moreover, I am indebted to Klaus Schubert, Miroslav Mareš and Petr Fiala for the opportunity to identify the research field I have finally entered and its value in a broader context of scholarly debate on historical evolution of welfare systems. The intellectual environment of the Department of Political Science at Masaryk University in Brno and the stimulating research visit to the Department of Social Policy and Intervention at the University of Oxford were a welcoming space in which my thought could settle and my argumentation could become clearer. I have benefited greatly from the constructive criticism of a number of colleagues from the Politics of Social Policy seminar, first and foremost Barbara Zarate, but also Lim Sang Hun, Jennifer Sigafoos, Emanuele Ferragina, and others. The research plan would not be possible without devoted intellectual support of Martin Seeleib- Kaiser, my advisor at the University of Oxford. I have also benefited from comments and suggestions about the research plan by Ondřej Císař, Robert Walker, Claus Offe and Peter A. Kemp and discussions with Jakub Rákosník and Dalibor Státník. Numerous participants at a number of conferences and seminars in Prague, Olomouc, London, Oxford, Münster and Siegen provided me with valuable feedback. The text has been edited with the kind help of John Korba and Laura Brade, whom I would like to thank for their efficiency and professionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV Online Appendix ∗
    The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV Online Appendix ∗ Ruben Durantey Paolo Pinottiz Andrea Teseix August 2018 [forthcoming in The American Economic Review] ∗We thank Alberto Alesina, Filipe Campante, Antonio Ciccone, Stefano DellaVigna, Ruben Enikolopov, Ray Fisman, Greg Huber, Brian Knight, Valentino Larcinese, Marco Manacorda, Torsten Persson, Barbara Petrongolo, Andrei Shleifer, Francesco Sobbrio, Joachim Voth, David Weil, Katia Zhu- ravskaya, four anonymous referees, and seminar participants at Bocconi, CREI, NYU, MIT, Sciences Po, Brown, Dartmouth, Sorbonne, WZB, Surrey, Queen Mary, Yale, EIEF, LSE, Namur, Bank of Italy, War- wick, UPF, and participants at the AEA Meetings, the EUI Conference on Communications and Media Markets, and the Lisbon Meeting on Institutions and Political Economy for helpful comments. We are very grateful to Ben Olken and Ruben Enikolopov for their help with the ITM software. We thank Nicola D'Amelio and Giuseppe Piraino for their assistance with data collection, Giovanni Sciacovelli for excellent research assistance, and Laura Litvine for her outstanding help with the digitization of the transmitters data. Ruben Durante is grateful to the Sciences Po Scientific Board for financial support. A previous version of this paper circulated under the title Voting Alone? The Political and Cultural Consequences of Commercial TV. yUniversitat Pompeu Fabra, Sciences Po, and CEPR; contact: [email protected]. zBocconi University, fRDB, CEPR, IRVAPP, and DONDENA; contact: [email protected]. xQueen Mary University, CEP (LSE), and CEPR; contact: [email protected]. A1 Appendix A Additional tables and figures Table A1: Programming schedules, Mediaset vs. RAI 1983-1987 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) total share of total airtime critics' reviews MPAA parental airtime entert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV †
    American Economic Review 2019, 109(7): 2497–2530 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150958 The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV † By Ruben Durante, Paolo Pinotti, and Andrea Tesei* We study the political impact of commercial television in Italy exploiting the staggered introduction of Berlusconi’s private TV network, Mediaset, in the early 1980s. We find that individuals with early access to Mediaset all-entertainment content were more likely to vote for Berlusconi’s party in 1994, when he first ran for office. The effect persists for five elections and is driven by heavy TV viewers, namely the very young and the elderly. Regarding possible mechanisms, we find that individuals exposed to entertainment TV as children were less cognitively sophisticated and civic-minded as adults, and ultimately more vulnerable to Berlusconi’s populist rhetoric. JEL D72, L82, M31, Z13 ( ) There is extensive evidence that exposure to biased news on TV can influence viewers’ voting decisions DellaVigna and Kaplan 2007; Enikolopov, Petrova, and ( Zhuravskaya 2011 . News programs represent, however, just a fraction of total TV ) airtime,1 and other types of content may also influence viewers’ attitudes. Indeed, previous research indicates that, by priming particular cultural models, light enter- tainment shows, soap operas, and advertising can have important and persistent effects on various types of non-political behavior, such as civic engagement, gen- der attitudes, and consumption choices Putnam 2000; Olken 2009; Jensen and ( Oster 2009; Bursztyn and Cantoni 2016; La Ferrara, Chong, and Duryea 2012 .2 In ) addition, there is evidence that exposure to television at a young age can influence * Durante: ICREA, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IPEG, Barcelona GSE, and CEPR email: rubendurante@gmail.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Cycles and Exchange Rates*
    Presidential Cycles and Exchange Rates* Pasquale Della Corte Hsuan Fu First Draft: April 2019. This Draft: December 2020 *The authors would like to thank Gianluca Benigno, Alexander Michaelides, and Paolo Volpin as well as participants at the IB & Finance Paper Development Workshop at King's College London in 2018 and the 36th International Conference of the French Finance Association. Pasquale Della Corte is with Imperial College London and CEPR, e-mail: [email protected]. Hsuan Fu is with Universit´eLaval, e-mail: [email protected]. Presidential Cycles and Exchange Rates Abstract This paper shows that US presidential cycles can predict dollar-based exchange rate returns. Armed with nearly 40 years of data and a large cross-section of currency pairs, we document an average US dollar appreciation during Democratic presidential terms and an average US dollar depreciation during Republican presidential mandates. The difference in these average exchange rate returns is larger than 5% per annum and is not driven by cross-country interest rate differentials, inflation differentials, and pre- existing economic conditions. Moreover, we find that exchange rate returns increase with lower tariff rates, are higher for the peripheral countries of a trade network, and are higher for countries with higher interest rates. We interpret these findings as compensation for global trade policy uncertainty within a model of exchange rate determination with constrained financiers. Keywords: Political Cycles, Foreign Exchange, Currency Risk Premia, Trade Policy. JEL Classification: E44, D72, F13, F31, G15, G20, P16. \The US election has the potential to be a significant market mover" | Financial Times, September 28, 2020 1 Introduction Exchange rates are notoriously difficult to forecast and there is limited empirical support for traditional models based on economic fundamentals.
    [Show full text]
  • Aces the European Union Center of Excellence
    ACES THE EUROPEAN UNION CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AUGUST2009 The Italian Parliament and the EU: a slow and gradual Europeanization Federiga Bindi (· ' I The Italian Parliament and the EU: a slow and gradual Europeanization Federiga Bindi In this paper we discussed how the literature traces a growing involvement of the national parliaments in EU policy-making. Three phases can be distinguished: limited or no involvement was the trend nntil the 1980s; after the Single Act (SEA, 1987), national parliaments started to be interested in European affairs and to set up specialized committees; following the Maastricht Treaty (TUE, 1992), the involvement of national parliaments in EU affairs became a response to the question of"democratic deficit" in the EU (Norton, 1995). The growing number of policies dealt with at the EU level, the consequently increased influence ofEU law in nationallegislations, the new powers of the Union: all of these worked together to push national legislators to seek a scrutiny role in the drafting of EU legislation. According to Laprat (1995: I), once the TUE was formally approved, a more parliamentary climate prevailed. In more recent years, national parliaments have distinguished themselves for their increased role in the scrutiny of EU legislation (Raunio and Hix, 200I: !52); more specialized MPs sit in the committees on EU affairs; the amount of work for EU specialists has increased. Also, parliamentary scrutiny, initially only optional and ex post, is now increasingly ex ante and/or mandatory (Maurer and Wessels, 200I: 425-475). Also, though national parliaments are not mentioned in the first ten paraconstitutional articles of the TUE, they are now the object of various specific Declarations and Protocols: Declaration 13 and I 4, attached to the Maastricht Treaty, and most of the Protocol on the 2 Role ofNational Parliaments, attached to the Amsterdam Treaty (1996), focus on the role of national parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • From Revolution to Coalition – Radical Left Parties in Europe
    e P uro e t Parties in t Parties F e l evolution to Coalition – r al C Birgit Daiber, Cornelia Hildebrandt, Anna Striethorst (Ed.) adi r From From revolution to Coalition – radiCal leFt Parties in euroPe 2 Manuskripte neue Folge 2 r osa luxemburg stiFtung Birgit Daiber, Cornelia Hildebrandt, Anna Striethorst (Ed.) From Revolution to Coalition – Radical Left Parties in Europe Birgit Daiber, Cornelia Hildebrandt, Anna Striethorst (Ed.) From revolution to Coalition – radiCal leFt Parties in euroPe Country studies of 2010 updated through 2011 Phil Hill (Translation) Mark Khan, Eoghan Mc Mahon (Editing) IMPRINT MANUSKRIPTE is published by Rosa-Luxemburg-Foundation ISSN 2194-864X Franz-Mehring-Platz 1 · 10243 Berlin, Germany Phone +49 30 44310-130 · Fax -122 · www.rosalux.de Editorial deadline: June 2012 Layout/typesetting/print: MediaService GmbH Druck und Kommunikation, Berlin 2012 Printed on Circleoffset Premium White, 100 % Recycling Content Editor’s Preface 7 Inger V. Johansen: The Left and Radical Left in Denmark 10 Anna Kontula/Tomi Kuhanen: Rebuilding the Left Alliance – Hoping for a New Beginning 26 Auður Lilja Erlingsdóttir: The Left in Iceland 41 Dag Seierstad: The Left In Norway: Politics in a centre-left government 50 Barbara Steiner: «Communists we are no longer, Social Democrats we can never be the Swedish Left Party» 65 Thomas Kachel: The British Left At The End Of The New Labour Era – An Electoral Analysis 78 Cornelia Hildebrandt: The Left Party in Germany 93 Stéphane Sahuc: Left Parties in France 114 Sascha Wagener: The Left
    [Show full text]
  • Edited by Maya Adereth
    Phenomenal World Volumes Edited by Maya1 Adereth Phenomenal World 2 Market Economy, Market Society Interviews and Essays on the Decline of European Social Democracy Edited by Maya Adereth 3 Phenomenal World 4 Acknowledgements Many thanks are due. Above all to Adam Przeworski, who generous- ly provided intellectual mentorship as well as practical assistance from this project’s early stages until its completion. I’m very grateful to José María Maravall, for his contribution to the interviews in Spain, and the many hours of invigorating conversation which preceded and followed them. Jonathan Hopkin not only guided me through the key debates of the period in Spain and Italy, but, as my graduate supervisor, he was in- strumental in helping me formulate an interest in the questions posed by this series. Infinite thanks are due to my interview partners, Javier Padilla and Davide Ceccanti, who traveled many miles to conduct the interviews with me and devoted countless hours to helping me arrange, edit, and publish them. Sarah Katz and Pierre Stambul arranged my interviews in Paris, escorted me across the city, and compensated for my imperfect French. I’m grateful to Stephanie Mudge, David Broder, Jonah Birch, and Juan Andrade for contributing insightful commentary despite full schedules and truly unprecedented global circumstances. Megan Ghantous, Belen Hipola, Andrea Arándano, Elisabetta Gatti, and Edouard Rosselet all provided elegant translations. And finally, thanks to Michael Stynes, Molly Dektar, and Jack Gross at JFI, for sup- porting this project. — Maya Adereth 5 Phenomenal World Published by Phenomenal World Volumes, 2021 Designed by Partner and Partners. The volume ©️ Phenomenal World Volumes 2021 The contributions ©️ The contributors 2021 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]