The New Black Conservative: Rhetoric Or Reality?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Black Conservative: Rhetoric Or Reality? University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Political Science Political Science, Department of January 2003 THE NEW BLACK CONSERVATIVE: RHETORIC OR REALITY? Byron D. Orey University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscifacpub Part of the Political Science Commons Orey, Byron D., "THE NEW BLACK CONSERVATIVE: RHETORIC OR REALITY?" (2003). Faculty Publications: Political Science. 16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscifacpub/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Political Science by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE NEW BLACK CONSERVATIVE: RHETORIC OR REALITY? Byron D’Andra Orey, Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska, Lin- coln There is [a] class of [black] people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs. Booker T. Washington1 In recent years there has been growing speculation regarding an increase in the number of African Americans identifying themselves as conservatives. Much of this speculation has been heightened by the increase in the number of African American elites who identify themselves as conservatives. This list includes icons like Clarence Thomas, J.C. Watts, Alan Keyes and Ward Connerly, to name a few. Despite the increase in the number of African American elites who identify themselves as conser- vatives, there has been a dearth of systematic analyses to determine if this phenom- enon has trickled down to the masses. The new breed of African American conservatives tends to reject government pro- grams designed to benefit African Americans, while endorsing self-help types of programs. Some of its members cite Booker T. Washington’s emphasis on economic progress and centrality of character as their guiding philosophies. Rueter (1997) contends that, “Black conservatives favor free markets, individual responsibility, cultural conservatism, and a ‘color-blind’ approach to public policy” (85). Dawson (1994) presents a puzzle addressing the notion that although African Ameri- cans have become economically diverse in recent years, they still remain politically unified (e.g., members of the Democratic party). The author’s explanation is that African Americans possess a “linked fate” with the black community. That is, African Americans believe that what happens to African Americans as a group has a potential bearing on their personal lives. This linkage is directly related to the historical struggle of African Americans in the United States. Hence, given the history of economic subordination and political disenfranchisement faced by African Ameri- cans, combined with the massive resistance to changing these conditions by such conservatives as Southern Democrats, and Clarence Thomas, one of the questions posed by Dillard (2001), is why would an African American self-identify him/herself 1 As cited in Thornbrough (1969: 57). Perspectives 38 as a conservative? Rueter (1997) contends that “the views of black conservatives are out of touch with the views of mainstream black America” (90). As a result of being outside of the “mainstream,” African American conservatives have received intense criticism by members of the black community. According to Spike Lee, Malcolm X would call Clarence Thomas “a handkerchief head, a chicken- and biscuit-eating Uncle Tom” (U.S. News and World Report 1991, 16). Additionally, black conservatives have been given such labels as “Uncle Toms,” “house-Negroes,” and “sell-outs.” One potential answer to the above question is rooted in the above epigraph. To be sure, African American conservatives have provided support for traditional conserva- tive issues like welfare reform and abortion (i.e., pro-life positions); however, it ap- pears that some of this conservatism may be a function of resentment toward other African Americans. Indeed, in an exchange with black conservative, Shelby Steele, Amiri Baraka (for- merly known as LeRoi Jones), a noted poet-playwright and leader of the Black Power movement in the 1960s, states: Steele… tells us, like David Rockefeller, that “the only way we will see advancement of black people… is for us to focus on develop- ing ourselves as individuals and embracing opportunity.” … Of course it has long been the whine of house Negroes that they are individuals, not to be confused with common field niggers. It is the cry of the most reactionary sector of the bourgeoisie, that they, indeed, ain’t with the rest of us woogies. All black and poor and stinking like that! Additionally, Barker, Jones and Tate (1999) argue that the African American conser- vative position “dovetails quite nicely with the longstanding white supremacist notion that the unequal position of blacks is due neither to racism nor to systemic economic conditions but to the inappropriate behavior of blacks themselves” (99). In this vein, Clarence Thomas states, “[It] is just as insane for blacks to expect relief from the federal government for years of discrimination as it is to expect a mugger to nurse his victims back to health. Ultimately, the burden of your being mugged falls on you” (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 1991). John Hope Franklin, the father of African American history rebuts such statements as Thomas’s by writing, Self-help is admirable so long as it encourages initiative and achieve- ment in a society that gives all its members an opportunity to de- Perspectives 39 velop in the manner best suited to their talents. It must not be confused with or used as a substitute for society’s obligation to deal equitably with all its members and to assume the responsibility for promoting their well-being. This involves equal educational, economic and political opportunity regardless of age, gender or race. Judge Thomas, in failing in his utterances and policies to subscribe to this basic principle, has placed himself in the unseemly position of denying to others the very opportunities and the kind of assistance from public and private quarters that have placed him where he is today (National Association for the Advancement of Color People 1991). The research at hand, examines whether models that have traditionally been applied to detect white racism, can be useful in understanding this new breed of African American conservatives. Rhetoric or Reality? Much of the recent attention directed toward understanding the African American conservative has focused on the rhetoric of such writers as Shelby Steele and John McWhorter. The operative word here is writers. Shelby Steele is an English professor and McWhorter is a Linguistics professor. These works prove to be nothing more than essays that speak of the writers’ personal (biased) experiences. Said differently, the authors fail to conduct systematic analyses that help to improve our understand- ing of the African American conservative. Despite the recent media attention accorded the notion of a “new Black conserva- tive,” there has been limited systematic research examining this phenomenon. Tate (1993) reports that middle- to high- income African Americans are less likely to support social welfare policy when compared to blacks in the lower class. Welch and Foster (1987) find that African Americans with higher incomes are less supportive of affirmative action. Bolce and Gray (1979) report that lower class African Americans are more likely to favor affirmative action programs than higher class African Ameri- cans. These authors indicate, however, that the class differences depend upon the type of program being evaluated. In other words, they report that higher educated African Americans are more likely to reject quotas than African Americans with a high school degree or less. African Americans who graduate from college are no more likely, however, to oppose preferential treatment than African Americans who have not attended college. Dawson (1994) provides evidence to show that an increase in income increases the likelihood of an African American opposing affirmative action policies. Dawson (1994) contends that, this may point to the notion that middle class blacks feel that such programs may “stigmatize their accomplishments” (194). Perspectives 40 Simpson (1998) provides anecdotal evidence supporting the notion that young black conservatives tend to reject claims of racism as a reason for African American failure, while opting to turn to self-reliance and community-based programs as a solution to African American problems. Black Resentment? Previous research examining attitudes toward African Americans and racial policies has relied heavily on white racial attitudes. The research at hand, builds upon the extant literature by examining African American attitudes toward African Americans. Symbolic racism (same as racial resentment), a concept originally articulated by Sears and Kinder (1971), posits that white racial attitudes are no longer shaped by “biological racism,” the notion that blacks are an inherently inferior race to whites. These authors note that individuals who possess symbolic racial attitudes believe “that blacks violate such traditional American values as individualism
Recommended publications
  • Economic Ascendance Is/As Moral Rightness: the New Religious Political Right in Post-Apartheid South Africa Part
    Economic Ascendance is/as Moral Rightness: The New Religious Political Right in Post-apartheid South Africa Part One: The Political Introduction If one were to go by the paucity of academic scholarship on the broad New Right in the post-apartheid South African context, one would not be remiss for thinking that the country is immune from this global phenomenon. I say broad because there is some academic scholarship that deals only with the existence of right wing organisations at the end of the apartheid era (du Toit 1991, Grobbelaar et al. 1989, Schönteich 2004, Schönteich and Boshoff 2003, van Rooyen 1994, Visser 2007, Welsh 1988, 1989,1995, Zille 1988). In this older context, this work focuses on a number of white Right organisations, including their ideas of nationalism, the role of Christianity in their ideologies, as well as their opposition to reform in South Africa, especially the significance of the idea of partition in these organisations. Helen Zille’s list, for example, includes the Herstigte Nasionale Party, Conservative Party, Afrikaner People’s Guard, South African Bureau of Racial Affairs (SABRA), Society of Orange Workers, Forum for the Future, Stallard Foundation, Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB), and the White Liberation Movement (BBB). There is also literature that deals with New Right ideology and its impact on South African education in the transition era by drawing on the broader literature on how the New Right was using education as a primary battleground globally (Fataar 1997, Kallaway 1989). Moreover, another narrow and newer literature exists that continues the focus on primarily extreme right organisations in South Africa that have found resonance in the global context of the rise of the so-called Alternative Right that rejects mainstream conservatism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bible and the Ballot: Rev. Joseph H. Jackson and Black Conservatism
    THE BIBLE AND THE BALLOT: REV. JOSEPH H. JACKSON AND BLACK CONSERVATISM IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT By Steven Jay Lipson Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History May, 2013 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Dennis C. Dickerson Professor Gary Gerstle Introduction “Integrationism and nationalism represent the two broad streams of black thought in response to the problem of slavery and segregation in America. … All black intellectuals have represented aspects of each.”1 Conventional wisdom about the African-American freedom struggle, as represented here in a quotation by James H. Cone, typically sees blacks as taking one of two approaches to white racism and discrimination. On one side was Martin Luther King, Jr. and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), who led the mainstream civil rights movement in a campaign of legal challenges and nonviolent direct action to tear down the barriers of segregation and promote a colorblind society where blacks were fully integrated into American society and its institutions. King’s leadership of the African-American community was challenged by black nationalists like Malcolm X and black power advocates, who believed white American was irredeemably racist and as a result argued that black success could come only through militancy and a separation from white society. This binary between integrationist direct action and black nationalism appears everywhere in scholarly and popular discussion of the 1950s and 1960s, but it is not adequate in describing the forces at play in the black community at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Via Issuelab
    ROCKEFELLER ARCHIVE CENTER RESEARCH REPORTS Neither Right nor Left: Grassroots Black Conservatism in Post- World War II America by Chanelle Rose Rowan University © 2020 by Chanelle Rose Neither Right nor Left: Grassroots Black Conservatism in Post-World War II America In the summer of 2018, I was awarded a Rockefeller Archive Center (RAC) research stipend to conduct research on my book project, tentatively titled Neither Right nor Left: Grassroots Black Conservatism in Post-World War II America. Over the past two decades, the growth of scholarship on the history of modern conservatism and the rise of the New Right has moved this ideology from the margins of American society to mainstream political thought. Much of this work has foregrounded the lives, organizations, and political activity of white conservatives in the U.S. But scholars have begun to pay more serious attention to African Americans and their leadership in the Republican Party during the postwar era. Notwithstanding the significance of this emerging literature, it places a strong national and state focus on the instrumental role of black Republicans who waged an uphill battle to secure the GOP’s commitment to civil rights and racial equality. My project adopts a more bottom-up approach to understanding the development of modern black conservatism and its impact on the African American struggle for racial equality, focusing on its evolution in local communities from 1950 to 1985. I contend that even though the important role of black Republicans and conservatives at the national level during this period has begun to receive more attention, the lesser well-known individuals and groups, especially black women, who helped to shape conservative ideas about crime, education, and economic advancement, require further study.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama, Race & the Tea Party
    “We’re losing our country”: Barack Obama, Race & the Tea Party Clarence E. Walker Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/140/1/125/1829889/daed_a_00064.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 The United States is not as racist as it was when I was born in 1941. Asians have become citizens, blacks can vote in Southern elections, and inter- racial marriage is now legal nationwide. However, these advances in racial justice do not mean that racism is dead in the United States; indeed, it con- tinues to exercise a powerful hold on the Ameri- can imagination. How could it be otherwise? American democracy was created on a racial foun- dation, and although the election of a black presi- dent represents a historic step in the nation’s ra- cial modernization, it does not signal “the end of white America.” Even if it did, this development would not mean that Asians, blacks, Mexicans, and other Spanish speakers would get along with each other.1 Race will continue to plague Ameri- can politics even as the demographic composition of the nation changes. The idea that the death of whiteness might usher in racial nirvana rests on a demographic determinism that the history of the CLARENCE E. WALKER is Profes- American Republic renders problematic. sor of History at the University If we take a long view of race and politics, the of California, Davis. His publica- demise of white hegemony is an interesting but tions include The Preacher and the premature notion suggesting that contemporary Politician: Jeremiah Wright, Barack American racial liberalism, like the Garrisonian Obama, and Race in America (with abolitionists in the nineteenth century, has been Gregory D.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK NEOCONSERVATISM in the POST-CIVIL RIGHTS ERA a Thesis
    INCITING THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION: BLACK NEOCONSERVATISM IN THE POST-CIVIL RIGHTS ERA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Professional Studies by La TaSha Beatrice Levy January 2007 ©2007 La TaSha Beatrice Levy ABSTRACT Black neoconservatism is one of the most contested political ideologies of the Post-Civil Rights era. As a challenge to mainstream Black political thought, Black neoconservatism enjoys a particular celebrity as the “bold new voice” in American racial discourse. This thesis critically analyzes Black neoconservative ideology as a counter-discourse: a direct opposition to the liberalism of the 1960s and the legacy of the Civil Rights and Black Power eras. The emergence of Black neoconservatives as a significant collective in the Post-Civil Rights era correlates with the rise of the New Right in American politics since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. The New Right has forcefully disputed the philosophy and strategy of civil rights legislation and the traditional quest for racial equality and justice. Black neoconservatives play an increasingly significant ideological role in conservative politics and public debate in the Post-Civil Rights period. Furthermore, their racial identity lends credence to the New Right’s attack on social policy that disproportionately benefits Black people in general and the Black poor particularly. Black neoconservatives dissent from the prevailing convention that racism and White supremacy have become subtle, but nevertheless remain formidable. They insist that civil rights legislation, government intervention and liberal programs have created a pathological dependency among African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Conservative Intellectuals in Modern America Michael L. Ondaatje
    NEITHER COUNTERFEIT HEROES NOR COLOUR-BLIND VISIONARIES: BLACK CONSERVATIVE INTELLECTUALS IN MODERN AMERICA MICHAEL L. ONDAATJE This thesis is presented for a doctorate of philosophy in the discipline of History, School of Humanities, University of Western Australia. 2007 CONTENTS Abstract...............................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements............................................................................................................ii Introduction........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Historiography of Contemporary Black Conservatism............................10 Chapter 2: Contemporary Black Conservative Profiles..............................................38 Chapter 3: Black Conservatives and Affirmative Action.............................................83 Chapter 4: Black Conservatives and Black Poverty...................................................138 Chapter 5: Black Conservatives and Education ........................................................184 Conclusion......................................................................................................................225 Bibliography...................................................................................................................228 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No person is an island. Our debts to others stretch far back into the mists of time. And so it is not
    [Show full text]
  • For African Americans?
    Revue de recherche en civilisation américaine 1 | 2009 Varia Black conservatism in the 1980s: will the future be conservative … for African Americans? Lisa Veroni-Paccher Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rrca/115 ISSN: 2101-048X Publisher David Diallo Electronic reference Lisa Veroni-Paccher, « Black conservatism in the 1980s: will the future be conservative … for African Americans? », Revue de recherche en civilisation américaine [Online], 1 | 2009, Online since 21 April 2009, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rrca/115 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. © Tous droits réservés Black conservatism in the 1980s: will the future be conservative … for Africa... 1 Black conservatism in the 1980s: will the future be conservative … for African Americans? Lisa Veroni-Paccher 1 With the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the obstacles to registration and voting were removed, and black political participation greatly increased. Meanwhile, thanks to the Civil Rights Movement, which reinforced group identity and cohesion, the election of African Americans to Congress accelerated and marked the decline of protest strategies. Direct social mobilization and political action were now favored. These new political leaders were all Democrats and quickly formed the most liberal group of the legislative branch. They were supported by black voters who had become loyal to the Democratic Party in the 1930s and shared the liberal views of their representatives. Despite demands for descriptive representation, African Americans were also asking for substantive representation. Indeed, both forms of representation came together for those who believed that Black political leaders were the only persons capable of ‘authentic’ representation.
    [Show full text]
  • WDN Prac Guide 1.Pdf (522.0Kb)
    The Workplace Diversity Network A Joint Project of The National Conference for Community and Justice and Cornell University ILR Resources for Workplace Diversity An Annotated Practitioner Guide to Information Fall 2000 Third Edition with Index Prepared by Tammy Bormann Susan Woods Chari Fuerstenau Deborah Joseph Candace Brooks-Cooper Catherine Ouellette Jennie Farley 2000©TheWorkplace Diversity Network www.ilr.cornell.edu/depts/wdn 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION i - iii SECTION I 1 - 13 MAKING DIVERSITY WORK: Strategic Approaches to Diversity In this section, we reference several books and articles that provide organizations with effective strategies and approaches to workplace diversity. The works of leading researchers and practitioners in the field are featured. SECTION II 14 - 26 KEY WORKS: Developing a Framework for Understanding We suggest key works in intergroup relations theory, history, and philosophy. These writings are suggested to help practitioners develop a framework for understanding the social and cultural dynamics of intergroup relations in the United States today. SECTION III 27 - 28 TEAMS AND DIVERSITY: Achieving High Performance With Inclusion Writings in this section discuss strategies and implications for team building and new work organization in workplaces that are diverse. SECTION IV 29 - 31 GLOBAL DIVERSITY: Working Across Cultures This section provides references that inform awareness and understanding of cross-cultural interactions to extend diversity considerations beyond the cultural framework of the US. It includes both key works for understanding the cross-cultural aspects of global diversity and readings on strategy and practice. SECTION V 32 - 35 WORK & LIFE: Exploring Flexibility for a Diverse Workforce Resources in this section explore the tension between work and personal life and offer suggestions for developing flexible work structure and benefit initiatives to accommodate the needs of a more diverse workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Political Thought
    Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christian Volk Di. 12-14 Uhr Ort: Ihnestr.22/UG 1 Sprechstunde: Di. 10.30-12.00 Uhr Black Political Thought Das Seminar führt in das politische, soziale und philosophische Denken afroamerikanischer Autorinnen und Autoren ein. Im Laufe des Semesters werden die verschiedenen theoretische Perspektiven zu Themen wie Rassismus, Feminismus, Ökonomie, Demokratie, Multikulturalis- mus und Identität herausgearbeitet. Der Kurs verfolgt eine doppelte Zielsetzung: Zum einen geht es darum, die Schlüsselthemen, Kernfragen und Debatten, die die zeitgenössische afro- amerikanische Theorie beeinflussen, aufzuarbeiten und kritisch zu reflektieren. Zum anderen soll deutlich werden, wie und in welcher Form afroamerikanische Theoriebildung den Kanon bzw. kanonische Denkkonstellationen der politischen Theorie und Philosophie transzendiert. Im ersten Teil des Seminars beschäftigen wir uns überblicksartig mit der Frage, wie afroame- rikanisches Denken die politische Theorie und Philosophie aufgreift und hinterfragt. Anschlie- ßend gehen wir auf zentrale Grundpositionen und Schlüsseldebatten afroamerikanischer The- oriebildung ein und arbeiten die Unterschiede innerhalb und zwischen den liberalen, konser- vativen, nationalistischen und sozialistisch-revolutionären Denkschulen heraus. Einen beson- deren Schwerpunkt stellen dabei die feministischen und intersektionalen Analysen afroame- rikanischer Denkerinnen dar. Der letzte Teil des Seminars beschäftigt sich exemplarisch mit aktuellen sozialen, ökonomischen und politischen Herausforderungen, an denen sich afro- amerikanisches Denken abarbeitet. Aktive Teilnahme: Protokoll zu einer der Sitzungen (Abgabe in der darauffolgenden Sit- zung), Impulskommentar oder ggf. Referat Leistungsschein: Hausarbeit (6.000 Wörter) oder Referatsausarbeitung (3.000 Wörter) 1. Sitzung: 15.10.2019 Einführung Einführung in Thema und Seminar 2. Sitzung: 22.10.2019 Grundlagen I Lektüregrundlage: - Toni Morrison 1993: Noble Lecture. In: World Literature Today, 68(1), 1994, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Journal for American Studies Yearbook of the Polish Association for American Studies and the Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
    Polish Journal for American Studies Yearbook of the Polish Association for American Studies and the Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw Vol. 8 (2014) Julia Fiedorczuk Can Poetry Save the Earth? An Interview with Gary Snyder Zoe Detsi-Diamanti Sarah Pogson’s The Female Enthusiast and American Republican Virtue Tunde Adeleke The Political Pragmatism of Martin R. Delany Zbigniew Maszewski Homesickness for the Wild and Hemingway’s African Dressing Gown Alicja Piechucka Andy Warhol and the Dawn of Modern-Day Celebrity Culture TYTUŁ ARTYKUŁU 1 Polish Journal for American Studies Yearbook of the Polish Association for American Studies and the Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw Vol. 8 (2014) Warsaw 2014 2 IMIĘ NAZWISKO MANAGING EDITOR Marek Paryż EDITORIAL BOARD Paulina Ambroży, Patrycja Antoszek, Zofia Kolbuszewska, Karolina Krasuska, Zuzanna Ładyga ADVISORY BOARD Andrzej Dakowski, Jerzy Durczak, Joanna Durczak, Andrew S. Gross, Andrea O’Reilly Herrera, Jerzy Kutnik, John R. Leo, Zbigniew Lewicki, Eliud Martínez, Elżbieta Oleksy, Agata Preis-Smith, Tadeusz Rachwał, Agnieszka Salska, Tadeusz Sławek, Marek Wilczyński REVIEWERS FOR VOL. 8 Tomasz Basiuk, Mirosława Buchholtz, Jerzy Durczak, Joanna Durczak, Dominika Ferens, Paweł Jędrzejko, Ewa Łuczak, Zbigniew Mazur, Tadeusz Pióro, Agata Preis-Smith, Justyna Wierzchowska, Beata Williamson, Justyna Włodarczyk ISSN 1733–9154 Copyright by the authors 2014 Polish Association for American Studies, Al. Niepodległości 22, 02–653 Warsaw www.paas.org.pl Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw ul. Nowy Świat 4, 00–497 Warsaw www. angli.uw.edu.pl Typesetting, cover design by Bartosz Mierzyński Cover Image: “Martin R. Delany,” National Portrait Gallery, Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Neutral the New Black?: Advancing Black Interests Under the First Black Presidents
    IS NEUTRAL THE NEW BLACK?: ADVANCING BLACK INTERESTS UNDER THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENTS An undergraduate thesis presented by SAMANTHA JOY FAY Submitted to the Department of Political Science of Haverford College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Advised by Professor Stephen J. McGovern April 2014 Copyright © 2014 Samantha Joy Fay All Rights Reserved 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I am eternally grateful to God for giving me the strength to get through this process, especially when I did not think I had it in me to keep going. If nothing else, writing this has affirmed for me that through Him all things are possible. To God be the glory. Second, thank you to everyone who contributed to my research, especially my advisor. It would take far too long for me to name all of you, and I would hate to forget someone, so I hope it will suffice to say that I am indebted to you for the time and effort you expended on my behalf. Third, I have to give a shout-out to my friends. I have neglected you in the worst way this year, but I am so grateful for the distractions from the misery of work, your attempts to stay up as late as I do (nice try), and most of all your understanding. I really do appreciate you, your encouraging words, your shared cynicism, and your hugs. I hope this makes up for me not being able to show it as much as I wanted to this year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loneliness of the Black Republican
    Introduction The Paradox of the Black Republican There is a fascinating Saturday Night Live sketch from 1980, a piece almost entirely forgotten by most viewers of the NBC comedy show. The sketch survives in the pop culture arena only because it features the SNL debut of comedian Eddie Murphy. Airing about a month after the country elected an ex-actor to the presidency (ousting a former Georgia peanut farmer in the process), the skit is a spoof of Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom, that unconventional animal wildlife series sponsored by an insurance company. In the SNL piece, a Jim Fowler– type zoologist braves the “savage” landscape of a tony Manhattan cocktail party in search of an elusive subject: the Negro Republican. Tracking the “migratory patterns” of African Americans “fleeing the liberal lake wastelands” for the “fertile promised land of the GOP,” the scientist stumbles badly— a hilarious case of mistaken identity—when he assumes that a black funeral parlor direc- tor must be a member of the GOP. Undeterred, he spots another black man nearby— a thorough examination of speech patterns, clothing, musi- cal tastes, and economic interests confirms that the subject is indeed the evasive Negro Republican. With great care, the zoologist sedates the “ex- otic creature,” attaching a blinking transmitter disguised as an American flag pin to the man’s lapel. As the disoriented man awakens, the scientist quickly hides, emerging to take notes on his subject from afar once the Negro Republican has wandered back into the “wild.”1 “In Search of the Negro Republican” is a riveting political satire, inter- esting not for the writing or the cast’s performance but for the ideas con- veyed by the sketch—ideas about popular perceptions of African Ameri- can members of the GOP.
    [Show full text]