18B0223-19F0223 [ERIV] IP Athos BO [Smn3] FINAL 20190826

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

18B0223-19F0223 [ERIV] IP Athos BO [Smn3] FINAL 20190826 In Reply Refer to: FWS-ERIV-18B0223-19F0998 August 28, 2019 Sent by Email Memorandum To: Field Manager, Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Palm Springs, California From: Acting Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California Subject: Section 7 Biological Opinion on the IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Riverside County, California This memorandum transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion regarding the construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning of the proposed IP Athos Renewable Energy Project (Project) in Riverside County, California, and its effects on the federally threatened Mojave population segment of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and its designated critical habitat in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your request for formal consultation dated February 21, 2019, was received on February 27, 2019. Additional information and revisions to the biological assessment were received on May 3, 2019. Intersect Power is the non-Federal applicant for a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) right-of-way (ROW) authorization for the Project. Your agency has determined the Project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Yuma Ridgeway’s (=clapper) rail [Rallus obsoletus (=longirostris) levipes; Ridgway’s rail], southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), and the western distinct population segment (western DPS) of the yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). We do not anticipate adverse impacts to these avian species’ breeding activities with implementation of the Project since individuals will be migrating through the action area between their wintering and breeding areas. These species do not breed or winter within the Project area because suitable breeding habitat is not present. Therefore, adverse effects would result from collision with Project features such as solar panels, power lines, and fences. Based on the limited number of mortalities found at other utility-scale solar facilities in the Mojave Desert, collision effects at a single project would be sporadic, unlikely to occur or would be considered a 2 discountable effect. The information we have available to date indicates that individuals of listed birds have indeed died as a result of interactions with solar facilities. However, when we attempted to evaluate the risk of collision at specific renewable energy projects, we determined the risk to individual birds was unquantifiably low and therefore discountable when considered at a project level. However, the documented patterns of mortality to Yuma Ridgway’s rail and willow flycatcher (subspecies undetermined) from energy infrastructure in the California desert (Service 2013-2015, unpubl. data), recent data on migration and dispersal patterns of Yuma Ridgway’s rail documenting migratory stopovers in non-marsh arid habitats (Harrity and Conway 2018), and the additive risk of multiple hazards posed by energy-related infrastructure development on a California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan level, are not discountable and should be addressed at a programmatic scale in a way that provides consistency across different projects. As a result, the Service and BLM committed to work together to develop options that provide better project-by-project consistency in monitoring bird mortalities, including incidental take of listed birds, and can be applied under the CDCA Plan and the Act (Service 2017a). Until a programmatic approach is developed, we will continue to evaluate this risk on a case-by- case basis and to provide site-specific recommendations to avoid adverse effects to avian species. Based on the information that is available to us at this time, we concur with your determination that the Project is not likely to adversely affect Yuma Ridgway’s rail, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, or the yellow-billed cuckoo. Designated critical habitat for these species does not occur in the Project area; therefore, no effects to designated critical habitat are anticipated. This biological opinion is based on information provided in the following documents and communications: (1) the Final Environmental Impact Report for the IP Athos LLC’s Athos Renewable Energy Project (Riverside County 2019a, hereinafter final EIR); (2) the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the IP Athos LLC’s Athos Renewable Energy Project (Riverside County 2019b, hereinafter draft EIR); (3) the Biological Assessment for the IP Athos Renewable Energy Project (BLM 2019, hereinafter BA); (4) the Biological Resources Technical Report, IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Riverside County, California (Ironwood 2019, hereinafter BRTR); (5) written, telephone, and electronic mail correspondence received during the consultation time period; and (6) pertinent literature contained in our files. The project file for this consultation is located at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office. CONSULTATION HISTORY Between June 2018 and August 2019, staff from the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office (PSFWO) worked with the BLM, Intersect Power (IP), and staff from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to clarify the Project Description, Project build-out scenarios, effects to desert tortoise, effects to listed birds, and avoidance and minimization measures. Efforts to clarify these issues included conducting site visits and meetings, assessing baseline conditions, and providing comments on the draft BA. 3 BIOLOGICAL OPINION DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION The information below provides a summary of the proposed action. Refer to the BA and final EIR for a more detailed description of Project activities. The proposed action is the BLM’s issuance of a ROW grant that will authorize Intercept Power (Applicant) to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission a 500 megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) facility and construct 11 miles of a 220-kilovolt (kV) electrical transmission line (generation interconnection or gen-tie) that would occupy a land area of approximately 3,440 acres, including 194.8 acres on BLM land and 3,265 acres (minus 23-acre avoidance area) on private land across seven groups of non-contiguous parcels in the Desert Center area of Riverside County (Figure 1; BLM 2019, Riverside County 2019a). According to the BA and final EIR, the Project includes a 23-acre avoidance area to minimize impacts to desert dry wash woodland habitat on private land (eastern portion of parcel group F on Figure 1). The Project would include up to 500 MW of integrated energy storage capacity. The overhead and potential underground portions of the 220 kV gen-tie transmission line would convey power by interconnecting to the Southern California Edison (SCE) Red Bluff Substation, an existing substation located south of Interstate 10 (I-10) and approximately 1.1 miles south of the Project area on land administered by the BLM. The portion of the 220 kV gen-tie transmission line outside of the solar facility would be located on 7 miles of Federal lands managed by the BLM Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office. The remainder of the gen-tie lines would traverse approximately 4 miles of privately owned land, primarily on the solar facility sites. Designated critical habitat occurs in the southern extent of the Project adjacent to the gen-tie transmission line on BLM land within the Chuckwalla Critical Habitat Unit (CHU) in the Colorado Desert Recovery Unit for desert tortoise. The entire Project is located on both private lands and BLM-administered public lands. The portions of the Project proposed for PV and storage components consist of seven non-contiguous groups of privately-owned parcels identified as parcel groups A-G. The gen-tie routes are identified as four segments (gen-tie segments 1, 2, 3, and 4) with one alternative (gen-tie segment 1A) and are located on a combination of privately owned and BLM managed lands (Figure 1). Additional access areas are also on a combination of private and public lands. The following Project terminology is used to differentiate between these components: ● Athos Project: The whole of the Project, including public and private land components, identified as the Athos Renewable Energy Project in the final EIR and BA; and ● BLM component: The portions of the proposed gen-tie routes that would be located on BLM lands, identified as the BLM Proposed Action in the final EIR and BA. The Project is located on lands managed by BLM pursuant to the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan (BLM 1980, as amended; BLM 1999) and the Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan (NECO), an amendment to the CDCA Plan. The Western Solar Plan (BLM 2012) and the; 4 Figure 1. Athos Solar Project (from draft EIR [Riverside County 2019b]). 5 Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan [DRECP] (BLM 2016) amended the CDCA Plan to allow for development of solar energy generation on public lands in specific areas which include the Project area. The Project is located within a Development Focus Area (DFA) identified in the DRECP. As part of a DFA, the site of the Project is designated as suitable for energy accessory uses and the proposed use would be compatible with the CDCA Plan. The BLM component of the Project is subject to management direction and Conservation Management Actions (CMAs) specified in the DRECP Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) as applicable within DFAs. The private land components of the Project are not administered by BLM and thus not subject to the DRECP. The biological opinion for the DRECP states that BLM’s role for a covered project in a DFA is to request Service concurrence that the project is consistent with the DRECP. The BLM component of the Project (i.e., the public lands segments of the gen-tie ROW) could be authorized through written concurrence alone, without additional section 7 consultation. However, the private land component of the Project are not subject to the DRECP and therefore the DRECP biological opinion is not applicable.
Recommended publications
  • Desert Tortoise Survey and General Biological Resources Assessment for the Joshua Tree Solar Farm (Airport Site) San Bernardino County, CA
    2015 Desert Tortoise Survey and General Biological Resources Assessment for the Joshua Tree Solar Farm (Airport Site) San Bernardino County, CA United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute Joshua Tree North and Sunfair quadrangle Township 1 N, Range 7 E, Section 21 Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 0607-364-06, 0607-231-07, 0607-231-09, 0607-231-10, 0607-231- 11, 0607-231-12, 0607-231-13, 0607-231-14, 0607-231-15, and 0607-231-18 Prepared For: Joshua Tree Solar Farm, LLC 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408 Contact: Andy Flajole, (206) 937-1174 Prepared By: Tetra Tech, Inc. 350 Indiana Street, Suite 500 Golden, CO 80401 Contact: Emily Mix, 303-980-3509 and Alice E. Karl, Ph.D. P.O. Box 74006 Davis, CA 95617 530-304-4121 Field Work Conducted By: Dr. Alice Karl, Glenn Rink, and Tim Thomas June 2015 Joshua Tree Solar Farm Spring 2015 General Biological Resources Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Joshua Tree Solar Farm, LLC (Applicant) is proposing to construct, own, and operate a 20 megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) generating facility located on approximately 115-acres, referred to as the Joshua Tree Solar Farm (Project). The Project would be on private land in unincorporated San Bernardino County, California, located approximately 3.5 miles east of the town of Joshua Tree and one mile north of Twentynine Palms Highway (Hwy 62). The power produced by the Project would be transmitted to the local power grid via a 1-mile, 33-kilovolt (kV) generation-tie line (gen-tie) overbuild of an existing line connecting to Southern California Edison’s (SCE’s) existing Pinto line located south of the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Comparative Morphology of Disk Floret Trichomes Of
    COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF DISK FLORET TRICHOMES OF ENCELIA (ASTERACEAE: HELIANTHEAE) A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Biological Sciences By Kevin Joseph Carpenter 1999 SIGNATURE PAGE THESIS: COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF DISK FLORET TRICHOMES OF ENCELIA (ASTERACEAE: HELIANTHEAE) AUTHOR: Kevin Joseph Carpenter DATE SUBMITTED: Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Curtis Clark Thesis Committee Chair Biological Sciences Dr. Gary Carlton Biological Sciences Dr. Mark Porter ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following for their help with my thesis and research, and for the great amount they have contributed to my education: My thesis committee members, Drs. Curtis Clark (committee chair), Gary Carlton, and Mark Porter (Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden) The faculty, staff, and graduate students of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, including Drs. Travis Columbus, Elizabeth Friar, and Roy Taylor, as well as Vanessa Ashworth Mike Kinney, Mike McMillin, Rashmi Pant, Eric Roalson, Victor Steinmann, and others. Others including my wife and parents, as well as Drs. Jonathan Baskin, David Edmonds, Don Fosket, Jim Doyle, Daryl Koutnik, David Moriarty, Brian McNamara, and Camm Swift. iii ABSTRACT Disk florets of 19 Encelia taxa were examined with scanning electron microscopy to characterize disk floret trichome complement, density, and distribution on anthers, abaxial corolla lobes, and corolla tubes, to interpret their evolution in light of the phylogeny and ecology of the species, and to determine the utility of these characters for phylogenetic analysis and species delimitation. Trichomes are all multicellular, and include biseriate glands, biseriate achene hairs (Zwillingshaare), and narrow unicellular- based, straight uniseriates.
    [Show full text]
  • A 30-Year Chronosequence of Burned Areas in Arizona— Effects of Wildfires on Vegetation in Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus Morafkai) Habitats
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management A 30-Year Chronosequence of Burned Areas in Arizona— Effects of Wildfires on Vegetation in Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) Habitats Open-File Report 2015-1060 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing burned habitat for the Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) within the perimeter of the Gost Fire, Maricopa County, Arizona. This site burned in 2005 and is representative of burned areas in the Arizona Upland subdivision of the Sonoran Desert. The burned saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea) is evident by scarring (beige) and charring (blackened) at the base and is surrounded by several species of short-lived perennials, as well as a few long-lived perennials that persisted through the fire. Photograph taken by Felicia Chen, U.S. Geological Survey, October 24, 2013. A 30-Year Chronosequence of Burned Areas in Arizona— Effects of Wildfires on Vegetation in Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) Habitats By Daniel F. Shryock, Todd C. Esque, and Felicia C. Chen Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Open-File Report 2015-1060 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants of Utah
    DESERT PLANTS OF UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen Revised May 1996 HG 505 FOREWORD The original Desert Plants of Utah by Berniece A. Andersen has been a remarkably popular book, serving as a tribute to both her botanical knowledge of the region and to her enthusiastic manner. For these reasons, we have tried to retain as much of the original work, in both content and style, as possible. Some modifications were necessary. We have updated scientific names in accordance with changes that have occurred since the time of the first publication and we have also incorporated new geographic distributional data that have accrued with additional years of botanical exploration. The most obvious difference pertains to the organization of species. In the original version, species were organized phylogenetically, reflecting the predominant concepts of evolutionary relationships among plant families at that time. In an effort to make this version more user-friendly for the beginner, we have chosen to arrange the plants primarily by flower color. We hope that these changes will not diminish the enjoyment gained by anyone familiar with the original. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor TABLE OF CONTENTS The Nature of Deserts ........................................................1 Utah’s Deserts ........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Science Plan for the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument
    National Conservation Lands Science Plan for the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument April 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Land Management Forest Service NLCS Science Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California State Office California Desert District Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region (Region 5) San Bernardino National Forest San Jacinto Ranger District Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument For purposes of this science plan, administrative direction established by the Bureau of Land Management as it relates to fostering science for the National Landscape Conservation System/National Conservation Lands is considered applicable to National Forest System lands within the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument to the extent it is consistent with U.S. Department of Agriculture and Forest Service policies, land use plans, and other applicable management direction. Page | 2 NLCS Science Plan National Conservation Lands Science Plan for the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument April 2016 prepared by University of California Riverside Center for Conservation Biology with funding from Bureau of Land Management National Conservation Lands Research Support Program Page | 3 NLCS Science Plan Barrel cactus and palm oases along the Art Smith Trail Page | 4 NLCS Science Plan National
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • I INDIVIDUALISTIC and PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON
    INDIVIDUALISTIC AND PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON PLANT COMMUNITY PATTERNS Jeffrey E. Ott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Robert K. Peet Peter S. White Todd J. Vision Aaron Moody Paul S. Manos i ©2010 Jeffrey E. Ott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jeffrey E. Ott Individualistic and Phylogenetic Perspectives on Plant Community Patterns (Under the direction of Robert K. Peet) Plant communities have traditionally been viewed as spatially discrete units structured by dominant species, and methods for characterizing community patterns have reflected this perspective. In this dissertation, I adopt an an alternative, individualistic community characterization approach that does not assume discreteness or dominant species importance a priori (Chapter 2). This approach was used to characterize plant community patterns and their relationship with environmental variables at Zion National Park, Utah, providing details and insights that were missed or obscure in previous vegetation characterizations of the area. I also examined community patterns at Zion National Park from a phylogenetic perspective (Chapter 3), under the assumption that species sharing common ancestry should be ecologically similar and hence be co-distributed in predictable ways. I predicted that related species would be aggregated into similar habitats because of phylogenetically-conserved niche affinities, yet segregated into different plots because of competitive interactions. However, I also suspected that these patterns would vary between different lineages and at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy (phylogenetic scales). I examined aggregation and segregation in relation to null models for each pair of species within genera and each sister pair of a genus-level vascular plant iii supertree.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey
    BOWMAN SOLAR PROJECT JUNE 2014 Focused Rare Plant Survey Goat Mountain United States Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangles San Bernardino Base and Meridian Township 2 North, Range 6 East, Sections 9, 10, 14, 15 and 16 Assessor Parcel Number 0630-351-01,-02,-03,-04,-05,-06,-07,-08,-09,-10,-11,-12,-13,-14,-15 Conditional Use Permit Number P201400196 Owner sPower 2 Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 692-7579 Prepared By Lenny Malo MS, Lincoln Hulse BS, Erin Serra BS, Onkar Singh BS, Ben Zamora BS, Mikaila Negrete MS, and Ken Hashagen BS 16361 Scientific Way, Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 467-9100 Focused Rare Plant Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................1-1 2.0 PROJECT AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................2-1 3.0 FOCUSED STUDY/SPECIES OF CONCERN .............................................................................3-1 4.0 METHODS ......................................................................................................................4-1 5.0 BOTANICAL SURVEY RESULTS ...........................................................................................5-1 5.1 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types .........................................................5-1 5.2 Special-Status Plants ...............................................................................................5-1 6.0 IMPACTS AND
    [Show full text]
  • Estern North American Naturalist 77(1):22–30
    SOURCE ARTICLE: PALMQUIST ET AL. 2017. WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 77(1):22–30 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 2. List of references used at the time of publication. A full list of up- to-date references is included with the data set on ScienceBase. ABELLA, S.R., AND J.D. SPRINGER. 2008. Canopy-tree influences along a soil parent material gradient in Pinus ponderosa-Quercus gambelii forests, northern Arizona. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 135:26–36. AL-OUDAT, M., AND M. QADIR. 2011. The halophytic flora of Syria. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area. Aleppo, Syria. ALCORTA, M., M.W. FIDELIBUS, K.L. STEENWERTH, AND A. SHRESTHA. 2011. Effect of vineyard row orientation on growth and phenology of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science 59:55–60. ANDERSON, M.D. 2001. Ephedra viridis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2015, May 12]. ANDERSON, M.D. 2004. Ephedra nevadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ []. ANDERSON, M.D. 2005. Artemisia ludoviciana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ ANDERSON, M.K. 2006. (a) Plant guide for western redbud (Cercis orbiculata Greene). USDA-NRCS National Plant Data Center, Plant Science Dept., University of California, Davis, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Arches National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Arches National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/220 ON THE COVER Double Arch, Arches National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Arches National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/220 Authors Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Mary Moran Southeast Utah Group National Park Service P.O. Box 907 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 June 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, con- servation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c stud- ies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the in- formation is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: a Flora of Southwestern Arizona: Part 2
    Felger, R.S., S. Rutman, J. Malusa, and T.R. Van Devender. 2013. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A flora of southwestern Arizona: Part 2. The checklist. Phytoneuron 2013-27: 1–30. Published 9 April 2013. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA OF SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA PART 2. THE CHECKLIST RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] & Sky Island Alliance P.O. Box 41165 Tucson, Arizona 85717 *author for correspondence SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 JIM MALUSA School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] THOMAS R. VAN DEVENDER Sky Island Alliance P.O. Box 41165 Tucson, Arizona 85717 [email protected] & Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 ABSTRACT A checklist is provided for the modern and fossil vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona. The modern flora includes 741 native and non-native taxa. The fossil record includes more than 219 species documented by specimens recovered from packrat ( Neotoma spp.) middens spanning the last 43,000+ years. An additional checklist is provided for the approximately 135 taxa restricted to higher-elevation mountains in Organ Pipe Cactus NM. This article is the second contribution for our flora of southwestern Arizona. KEY WORDS : Sonoran Desert, vascular plant flora, Arizona, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, Tinajas Altas, deep history, non-native species, desert sky islands This article provides a checklist for the vascular plant flora of the three contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona—the heart of the Sonoran Desert (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification, Disparification and Hybridization in the Desert Shrubs Encelia
    Research Diversification, disparification and hybridization in the desert shrubs Encelia Sonal Singhal1 , Adam B. Roddy2 , Christopher DiVittorio3,4, Ary Sanchez-Amaya5, Claudia L. Henriquez5 , Craig R. Brodersen6 , Shannon Fehlberg7 and Felipe Zapata5 1Department of Biology, CSU Dominguez Hills, 1000 E Victoria Street, Carson, CA 90747, USA; 2Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33133, USA; 3University of California Institute for Mexico and the United States, University of California, 3324 Olmsted Hall, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; 4Pinecrest Research Corporation, 5627 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 420, Oakland, CA 94609, USA; 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 612 Charles E. Young Dr. South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; 6School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; 7Research, Conservation, and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, 1201 N Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA Summary Author for correspondence: There are multiple hypotheses for the spectacular plant diversity found in deserts. We Sonal Singhal explore how different factors, including the roles of ecological opportunity and selection, pro- Email: [email protected] mote diversification and disparification in Encelia, a lineage of woody plants in the deserts of the Americas. Received: 31 July 2020 Using a nearly complete species-level phylogeny based on double-digest restriction-aided Accepted: 10 January 2021 sequencing along with a broad set of phenotypic traits, we estimate divergence times and diversification rates, identify instances of hybridization, quantify trait disparity and assess phe- New Phytologist (2021) notypic divergence across environmental gradients. doi: 10.1111/nph.17212 We show that Encelia originated and diversified recently (mid-Pleistocene) and rapidly, with rates comparable to notable adaptive radiations in plants.
    [Show full text]