<<

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2005), 186, 7^10 EDITORIAL

Partial agonism and modest success. It is apparent, though, that all effective to date incorpo- rate D2 antagonism in their A. A. BOLONNA and R. W. KERWIN mechanism of action; therefore, the current discovery process aims to identify that primarily target the dopaminer- gic system with greater therapeutic efficacy (Kapur & Mamo, 2003). When considering the potential benefits of receptor partial in the treatment of schizo- phrenia, two functional aspects of the system require consideration: Recent literature on partial agonists has intrinsic activity than full agonists. Partial the postulated reciprocal dysregulation of generated interest in their therapeutic agonists can elicit different receptor re- cortical and subcortical dopamine systems, potential in schizophrenia. This has been sponses depending on their environment: and the role of dopamine autoreceptors in driven, in part, by the recent approval of in the presence of agonists with higher schizophrenia. the dopamine (D2) receptor partial intrinsic activity, partial agonists can in the USA and Europe. In demonstrate antagonist properties by comparison with conventional and atypical blocking access to the receptor, but on their DUAL PATHOLOGY antipsychotics that mediate their therapeu- own they will act as agonists (Fig. 1). tic effects by D2 receptor blockade, aripi- There are numerous reports of partial ago- The original dopamine hypothesis for prazole has a unique mechanism of action. nists that act at the D2 receptor; those of re- schizophrenia was based on the belief that However, the concept of partial agonists levance to the treatment of schizophrenia dopamine only innervated subcortical for the treatment of schizophrenia is not are discussed in detail below. regions, and that these regions were over- entirely novel, since aripiprazole is one of stimulated by excessive dopamine trans- several members of this class of drug. This mission (Seeman & Lee, 1975; Creese editorial reviews the neurochemistry of WHY IS A et aletal, 1976). However, advances in bio- dopamine in schizophrenia and discusses OF THEORETICAL INTEREST chemical and behavioural techniques led the theoretical importance of partial agon- IN SCHIZOPHRENIA? to the identification of additional cortical ism as a mechanism for the treatment of dopamine projections (Thierry et aletal, 1973),1973) this illness. We also summarise the histori- The original dopamine hypothesis of which responded in an opposite way to sub- cal information on previous trials of partial schizophrenia proposed an excess of dopa- cortical dopamine systems: loss of frontal agonists in schizophrenia and evaluate minergic activity as the fundamental cortical dopamine function increased motor other partial agonists neurochemical abnormality in the disorder activity, in direct contrast to the observa- that are currently under development. (Carlsson & Lindqvist, 1963). This was tions following stimulation of dopamine based in part on the observation that receptors in extrapyramidal or mesolimbic typical antipsychotics such as chlorproma- regions (Carter & Pycock, 1979). This WHAT IS A PARTIAL zine alleviated schizophrenia symptoms by seminal study and subsequent animal lesion AGONIST? antagonising D2 receptors. Hence, dopa- experiments showed an opposite and reci- mine receptor antagonists were considered procal regulation of cortical and subcortical Two fundamental properties of a drug the ideal therapeutic intervention in schizo- dopamine systems, leading the authors to determine its effect on a receptor: affinity, phrenia. In later years, the pharmacology of propose that the fundamental neurochem- the propensity of a drug to form a reversi- atypical agents such as cloza- ical lesion in schizophrenia involved a ble complex with its receptor, and efficacy pine and led to a reassessment of deficit in frontal cortical dopamine and an (or intrinsic activity), the ability of a drug these assumptions; atypicals demonstrated increase in subcortical dopamine function to produce a functional response (Stephen- relatively low affinities for dopamine recep- (Pycock(Pycock et aletal, 1980,1980aa,,bb).). son, 1956; Ariens & Simonis, 1964). For tors, but were also effective in the treatment Following these early reports, neuro- a given receptor, a drug can produce a of schizophrenia (Pilowsky et aletal, 1992;,1992; imaging studies and neuropsychological maximal response (full agonist) or have KapurKapur et aletal, 2000). Atypical antipsychotics tests on people with schizophrenia demon- no functional effect (full antagonist). Full are superior to conventional antipsychotics strated impaired functioning of the frontal agonists are traditionally naturally occur- in the treatment of negative symptoms and lobe (hypofrontality) (Weinberger & Ber- ring compounds (e.g. dopamine) and full are less likely to cause extrapyramidal side- man, 1996), and a correlation with negative antagonists are chemical entities produced effects (Kerwin & Osborne, 2000), which symptoms (Andreasen et aletal, 1992) and by pharmaceutical chemists. In reality, the has been attributed to their targeting of reduced dopaminergic activity (Weinberger majority of chemically related drugs acting neurotransmitter systems other than dopa- et aletal, 1988; Egan et aletal, 2001). Furthermore, at a receptor produce a spectrum of mine, in particular the system cortical D1 receptor levelsare reduced in functional responses that lie between full (Meltzer, 1999). Thus, the search for patients with schizophrenia (Abi Dhargam agonism and full antagonism (Ariens, relevant drug targets was broadened to & Moore, 2003). In contrast to the findings 1964). These drugs are termed ‘partial encompass other neurotransmitter recep- in the frontal lobe, -induced agonists’ because they have a lower tors; however, this approach has met with excess release of dopamine in the striatum

77

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 30 Sep 2021 at 09:14:01, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. BOLONNA & KERWIN

dysregulated dopamine release in schizo- phrenia (Grunder et aletal, 2003). However, it has been suggested that dopamine auto- receptor antagonists ( and amisul- pride) also stabilise dopamine systems in schizophrenia by increasing dopamine release and selectively blocking D2 and D3 receptors in the limbic system (Kerwin, 2000).

PARTIAL AGONISTS : OLD AND NEW

The concept of partial agonists in the correction of dysfunctional cortical and subcortical connectivity in schizophrenia dates back to the 1970s. Dopamine recep- tor partial agonists, by virtue of their unique mechanism of action, potentially represent a distinct class of atypical anti- psychotics. All clinically effective antipsy- chotics mediate their therapeutic effects by blockade of D2 receptors; partial agonists are postulated to improve symptoms by sta- bilising dysregulated cortical and subcorti- cal dopamine systems without generating Fig. 11Fig. Theoretical representation of receptor response to a full agonist and a partial agonist.This was initially the side-effects (movement disorders and demonstrated with muscarone-related compounds on isolatedrat jejunum (Ariens et aletal,1964).In the absence of hyperprolactinaemia) that are associated the full agonist, the partial agonist behaves as an agonist (squares), butbutproduces produces a lower maximal response than with non-specific D2 receptor blockade of the full agonist. At higher concentrations of the full agonist (triangles), the partial agonist acts as an antagonist. the nigrostriatal and tuberoinfundibular pathways (Richelson, 1999). One well-known partial agonist for thethetreatmenttreatment of schizophrenia was (77)-)- (subcortical region) of patients with schizo- and diminishing hyperactive dopamine 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-NN-n-propylpiperidine, phrenia compared with controls indicates a systems in subcortical regions. knownknownas (as(77)-3PPP or preclamol. This hyperactive subcortical dopamine system in compound targets D2-like receptor sub- schizophrenia (Breier et aletal, 1997). Overac- types and is selective for the dopamine tivity of the striatum was also associated AUTORECEP TORSTOR S autoreceptor (Clark et aletal, 1985; Chio etet with positive symptoms of schizophrenia alal, 1994). Placebo-controlled studies indi- (Breier(Breier et aletal, 1997).,1997). Dopamine autoreceptors may form an cated rapid improvements in positive and Thus, numerous studies on schizo- integral part of the therapeutic action of negative symptoms without the generation phrenia patients support the initial concept partial agonists in schizophrenia. Localised of motor side-effects (Lahti et aletal, 1998).,1998). of Pycock and colleagues and a subsequent to terminals and dendrites of dopaminer- However, this effect was not sustained revised dopamine hypothesis of schizo- gic neurons, dopamine autoreceptors (D2 beyond 1 week, possibly owing to desensiti- phrenia, which proposed that hyperactive and D3 receptors) exert a negative feed- sation of the dopamine autoreceptor. Other mesolimbic (subcortical) dopamine tracts back control on dopamine release and/ dopamine partial agonists that have under- contributed to the positive symptoms of or synthesis, subsequently reducing post- gone trials in schizophrenia include talipex- schizophrenia and underactive mesocortical synaptic activity (Elsworth & Roth, 1997). ole (B-HT 920), roxindole (EMD 49980) (cortical) dopamine pathways played a Dysregulation of neurotransmitter release and SDZ-HDC 912, but their effects on part in negative symptoms and cognitive by dopamine autoreceptors could contri- the symptoms of schizophrenia were, at impairment (Weinberger, 1987). This pos- bute to the postulated imbalance of corti- best, similar to conventional antipsychotics tulated imbalance of dopamine function cal and subcortical dopamine function in or not sustained at therapeutic doses (Oh- in frontal and subcortical regions may schizophrenia; for example, increased morimori et aletal, 1993; Wetzel et aletal, 1994). This bebeaa relevant therapeutic target in schizo- dopamine release due to the reduced variability in therapeutic effects may relate phrenia. Hence, a dopamine receptor activity of dopamine autoreceptors might to differences in the intrinsic activity of partial agonist (bearing in mind that partial be one source of hyperactivity in subcorti- each partial agonist at dopamine receptors agonism is a relative concept) could act cal systems. Thus, partial agonists that (Tamminga, 2002). However, two recent as a dopamine stabiliser by increasing display affinity for dopamine auto- dopamine receptor partial agonists (aripi- dopamine activity in the frontal cortex receptors are potential stabilisers of prazole and ) are promising

88

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 30 Sep 2021 at 09:14:01, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. PARTIAL AGONISM AND SCHIZOPHRENIA

candidates for the treatment of a D2 antagonist (), bifeprunox Bristol-Myers Squibb and Lundbeck, and schizophrenia (see below). decreases dopamine and 5-HT levels in has also acted as principal investigator for the rat nucleus accumbens (Lieberman, clinical trials of aripiprazole and 2004). Based on these observations, bife- (a Lundbeck product). Modern partial agonists prunox was classified as a partial agonist in the treatment of schizophrenia at D2 and 5-HT1A1A receptors. Bifeprunox REFERENCES AripiprazoleAripiprazole was also successful in reducing animal be- Aripiprazole (OPC-14597), a Bristol-Myers haviour associated with schizophrenia-like Abi Dhargam, A. & Moore, H. (2003) PrefrontalPrefrontal Squibb/Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd symptoms and extrapyramidal side-effects. dopamine transmission at D1receptors and the pathology of schizophrenia. Neuroscientist,, 55,404^416., 404^416. compound, has received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration Andreasen, N. C., Rezai, K., Alliger, R., et aletal (19 92)92)(19 CONCLUSIONS Hypofrontality in neuroleptic-na|neuroleptic-na|ve«ve patients and in and in Europe. Preclinical and clinical patients with chronic schizophrenia. Assessment with studies have highlighted aripiprazole as a Unlike the conventional antipsychotic 133 single-photon emission computed potential prototype of a new generation of tomography and theTower of London. Archives ofofArchives agents, modern atypical antipsychotics General Psychiatry,, 4949, 943^958. atypical antipsychotics that are dopamine have a lower propensity to cause extrapyr- system stabilisers. Preclinical studies classi- Ariens, E. J. (1964) Molecular Pharmacology.NewYork: amidal side-effects and to improve negative fied aripiprazole as a potent D2 receptor Academic Press. symptoms. Atypical antipsychotics demon- partial agonist (Burris et aletal, 2002). Addi- Ariens, E. J. & Simonis, A. M. (1964) Amolecular strate affinity for dopamine, and tional evidence of aripiprazole’s partial basis for drug action. Journal of Pharmacy and other neurotransmitter systems, but their Pharmacology,, 1616, 289^296.,289^296. agonist properties was gained from animal precise mechanism of action is unknown. models of dopamine hyperactivity and Ariens, E. J., Simonis, A. M. & Van Rossum, J. M. Several hypotheses have arisen to attempt (19 6 4) Drug^receptorDrug ^ receptor interaction: interaction of one hypoactivity: aripiprazole demonstrated to characterise the ‘atypicality’ of a drug, or more drugs with one receptor system. In Molecular antagonism of D2 receptors by suppressing Pharmacology (ed. E. J. Ariens), p.171. New York: including a high 5-HT2A2A/D2 binding ratio -induced stereotypy (dopa- Academic Press. and fast dissociation from D2 receptors mine hyperactivity model), and D2 agonist (Meltzer(Meltzer et aletal, 1989; Kapur & Seeman, Breier, A., Su, T. P., Saunders, R., et aletal (19 9 7) properties by blocking enhanced dopamine Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine- 2001). The D2 receptor partial agonists synthesis in rats treated with induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: evidence represent a class of drugs that may have from a novel positron emission tomography method. (dopamine hypoactivity model) (Kikuchi novel atypical properties. The therapeutic Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the et aletal, 1995). The stabilising effect of United States of America,, 9494,,2569^2574. 2569^2574. benefits of these drugs may reflect their aripiprazole on the dopamine system was action as dopamine system stabilisers in Burris, K. D., Molski,T.Molski, T. F., Xu, C., et aletal (2002)(2002) attributed to its targeting of presynaptic Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic, is a high-affinity the presence of a potential cortical and (autoreceptors) and post-synaptic D2 partial agonist at human dopamine D2 receptors. JournalJournal subcortical dopamine imbalance in schizo- of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,, 302302,, receptors. Further binding analysis of phrenia. All antipsychotic drugs produce 381^389.381^389. aripiprazole has established a broader adverse effects and are associated with vari- Carlsson, A. & Lindqvist, M. (1963) Effect ofofEffect pharmacological profile, including partial able response to treatment. Consequently, or haloperidol on formation of 3- agonist actions at serotonin (5-hydroxy- there is still a requirement for effective, safe methoxytyramine and normetanephrine in mouse , 5-HT) receptors 5-HT andand brain. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica,, 2020,140^144.,140^144. 1A1A and well-tolerated drugs for treating the 5-HT5-HT , and antagonism of 5-HT (Jordan(Jordan 2C2C 2A2A symptoms of schizophrenia. The reviewed Carter,C.Carter,C.J.& J. & Pycock,Pycock,C.J.(1979) C. J. (1979) The effects of 5,7- dihydroxytryptamine lesions of extrapyramidal and et aletal, 2002).,2002). evidence suggests a promising future for Short-term randomised controlled trials mesolimbic sites on spontaneous motor behaviour, and dopamine receptor partial agonists in the amphetamine-induced stereotypy. Naunyn- of aripiprazole indicate an efficacious drug treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology,, 308308,51^54. (for positive and negative symptoms) with Chio, C. L., Lajiness, M. E. & Huff, R. M. (1994) a good safety and tolerability record in Activation of heterologously expressed D3 dopamine patients with acute relapse of schizophrenia DECLARATIONOF INTEREST receptors: comparison with D2 dopamine receptors. or schizoaffective disorder (Marder et aletal,, Molecular Pharmacology,, 4545,51^60., 51^60. 2003; Potkin et aletal, 2003).,2003). We were eager to write a partial agonism Clark, D., Hjorth, S. & Carlsson, A. (1985) review without interference from the manu- Dopamine-receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying facturers of aripiprazole (Bristol-Myers autoreceptor selectivity.I.selectivity.I.Review Review of the evidence. JournalJournal of Neural Transmission,, 6262,1^52. Bifeprunox Squibb/Otsuka) and bifeprunox (Solvay In September 2003 bifeprunox (developed by Pharmaceuticals and H. Lundbeck A/S). Creese,I.,Burt,D.R.&Snyder,S.H.(1976)Creese, I., Burt, D. R. & Snyder, S. H. (1976) Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and Solvay Pharmaceuticals and H. Lundbeck Bifeprunox is at an earlier stage in its pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs. A/S) entered the phase III stage of clinical clinical development and therefore the Science,, 192192, 481^483. trials in schizophrenia. Preclinical studies publication base for this drug is limited. Egan, M. F., Goldberg, T. E., Kolachana, B. S., et aletal indicated that the compound was a putative However, we were anxious for this (2001)(2001) Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on with a pharmaco- editorial to be balanced and not be an frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. logical profile similar to aripiprazole. advertorial for aripiprazole. A.A.B. has no Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,, 9898, 6917^6922. Preliminary preclinical analysis demon- conflict of interest. R.W.K. is currently strates that bifeprunox modulates animal negotiating for funding for functional mag- Elsworth, J. D. & Roth, R. H. (1997) DopamineDopamine autoreceptor pharmacology and function. In I: DopamineI:Dopamine behaviour induced by dopamine hyper- netic resonance imaging studies on both ReceptorsReceptors (ed. R. L. Neve), pp 232^265. Totowa, NJ: activity or hypoactivity and, in contrast to aripiprazole and bifeprunox from both Humana Press.

99

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 30 Sep 2021 at 09:14:01, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. BOLONNA & KERWIN

Grunder,G., Carlsson, A. & Wong, D. (2003) Mechanisms of new antipsychotic medications. ArchivesArchives A. A. BOLONNA BSc(Hon), PhD,PhD,R.W.KERWIN, R.W.KERWIN, MA, PhD,PhD,MB MB BChir,BChir,DSc, DSc, FRCPsych, Section of Clinical of General Psychiatry,, 6060,,974^977. 974^977. Neuropharmacology,Institute of Psychiatry,London,UKPsychiatry,London, UK

Jordan, S., Koprivica,V., Chen, R., et aletal (2002)(2002) TheThe antipsychotic aripiprazole is a potent, partial agonist at CorrespCorrespondence:ondence:Professor Professor R.W.Kerwin,SectionR.W.Kerwin, Section of Clinical Neuropharmacology,Institute of Psychiatry, the human 5-HT1A receptor. European Journal of London SE5 8AF,UK.E-mail: spklrwk@@iop.kcl.ac.uk Pharmacology,, 441441,137^140. (First received 17 March 2004, accepted 21June 2004) Kapur, S. & Mamo, D. (2003) Half a century of antipsychotics and still a central role for dopamine D(2)receptors. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and and tolerability in short-term, placebo-controlled trials. Richelson, E. (1999) Receptor pharmacology of Biological Psychiatry,, 2727,1081^1090. Schizophrenia Research,, 6161,123^136. neuroleptics: relation to clinical effects. Journal of Clinical PsychiatryPsychiatry,, 6060,,5^14. 5^14. Kapur, S. & Seeman, P. (2001) Does fast dissociation Meltzer,Meltzer,H.Y.(1999) H. Y. (1999) The role of serotonin in from the dopamine d(2) receptor explain the action of antipsychotic drug action. Neuropsychopharmacology,, 21,, Seeman, P. & Lee,T. (1975) Antipsychotic drugs: direct atypical antipsychotics? A new hypothesis. American s10 6^ s115. correlation between clinical potency and presynaptic Journal of Psychiatry,, 158158, 360^369.,360^369. activity on dopamine neurons. Science,, 188188,1217^1219. Meltzer,H.Y.,Meltzer, H.Y., Matsubara, S. & Lee, J. C. (1989) Kapur, S., Zipursky, R., Jones, C., et aletal (2000) Classification of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs Relationship between dopamine D2 occupancy, clinical Stephenson, R. P. (1956) AAmodificationofreceptor modification of receptor on the basis of dopamine D-1,D-2 and serotonin 2 pKi response and side effects: a double-blind PET study of theory.theory. British Journal of Pharmacology,, 11, 379^393. values. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental first episode schizophrenia. American Journal of TherapeuticsTherapeutics,, 251,,238^246. 238^246. Ta m m i n g a , C . A . ( 2 0 0 2 ) Partial dopamine agonists in Psychiatry,, 157157,514^520.,514^520. the treatment of psychosis. Journal of Neural Transmission,, Ohmori,Ohmori,T., T., Koyama, T., Inoue, T., et aletal (19 93) B-HT Kerwin, R.R.W.(2000) W. (20 0 0) From pharmacological profiles to 109109, 411^420.,411^420. 920, a dopamine D2 agonist, in the treatment of clinical outcomes. International Journal of Clinical negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia. Biological Psychopharmacology,, 15,S1^S4., S1^S4. Thierry, A. M., Stinus, L., Blanc, G., et al (19(1973) 73) SomeSome PsychiatryPsychiatry,, 3333, 687^693.,687^693. evidence for the existence of dopaminergic neurons in Kerwin, R.W.&R.W. & Osborne, S. (2000) Antipsychotic Pilowsky,L.,Costa,D.C.,Ell,P.J.,Pilowsky, L., Costa, D. C., Ell, P. J., et aletal (19 92)9 2) the rat cortex. Brain Research,, 5050, 230^234. drugs. MedicineMedicine,, 2828, 23^25.,23^25. , single photon emission tomography and the Weinberger, D. R. (1987) Implications of normal brain dopamine D2 receptor blockade hypothesis of Kikuchi,T.,Tottori, K.,Uwahodo,Y., et aletal (19 95)95)(19 7-(4 - development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. schizophrenia. Lancet,, 340,199^202.,199^202. [4-(2,3-Dichlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyloxy)-3,4- Archives of General Psychiatry,, 44, 660^669. dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (OPC-14597), a new Potkin, S. G., Saha, A. R., Kujawa, M. J., et aletal (2003) putative antipsychotic drug with both presynaptic Aripiprazole, an antipsychotic with a novel mechanism Weinberger, D. R. & Berman, K. F. (1996) Prefrontal dopamine autoreceptor agonistic activity and of action, and vs placebo in patients with function in schizophrenia: confounds and controversies. postsynaptic D2 receptor antagonistic activity. JournalJournal schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Archives of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,, 274,, General Psychiatry,, 60,,681^690. 681^690. Series B, Biological Sciences,, 351351,1495^1503. 329^336.329^336. Pycock, C. J., Carter,C. J. & Kerwin, R.W. (1980aa)) Weinberger, D. R., Berman, K. F. & Illowsky, B. P. Lahti, A. C.,Weiler, M. A., Corey, P.K.,P. K., et aletal (19 9 8)8)(19 Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial (19 8 8) Physiological dysfunction of dorsolateral Antipsychotic properties of (77)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)- prefrontal cortex on neurotransmitter systems in prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. III. A new cohort and NN-n-propylpiperidine (preclamol) in schizophrenia. subcortical sites in the rat. Journal of Neurochemistry,, 3434,, evidence for a mechanism. Archives ofofArchives Biological Psychiatry,, 4343,,2^11. 2 ^ 11. 91^99. General Psychiatry,, 4545, 609^615.,609^615. Lieberman, J. A. (2004) Dopamine partial agonists: a new class of antipsychotic. CNS DrugsDrugsCNS ,, 1818, 251^267. Pycock, C. J., Kerwin, R.W. & Carter,C. J. (1980bb)) Wetzel, H., Hillert, A., Grunder,Grunder,G., G., et aletal (1994)(1994) Effect of lesions of cortical dopamine terminals on Roxindole, a dopamine autoreceptor agonist, in the Marder, S. R., McQuade, R. D., Stock, E., et aletal (2003) subcortical dopamine receptors in the rat. Nature,, 286286,, treatment of positive and negative schizophrenic Aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia: safety 74^77.74^77. symptoms.symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 151151,1499^1502.

10

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 30 Sep 2021 at 09:14:01, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use.