Snowpack Optical Properties in the Infrared

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Snowpack Optical Properties in the Infrared BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LIBRARY REPORT 79-11 Snowpack optical properties in the infrared 70 s ~ <S> \ * *=> l,***»r AUb?8 1979 'ZSSSff* For conversion of SI metric units to U.S./British customary units of measurement consult ASTM Standard E380, Metric Practice Guide, published by the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race St., Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION DENVER U6RARY 92028164 isoEfiim ■ ^ ^ l RREL Report 79-11 Oi Snowpack optical properties in the infrared Roger H. Berger May 1979 Prepared for DIRECTORATE OF MILITARY PROGRAMS OFFICE, CHIEF OF ENGINEERS By UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, U.S.A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered) READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. R E P O R T N U M B E R 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENTS CATALOG-NUMBER ' -G R R E L 1 Report 79-11 4. T IT L E (and Subtitle) J 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED 3 SNOWPACK OPTICAL PROPERTIES IN THE INFRARED 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTHOR!» 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER!» Roger H. Berger s 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK A R E A & WORK UNIT NUMBERS U .S.% rny Cold Regions Research and Engineering Labefatury™ DA Project 4A762730AT42 Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 ^ Technical Area A1, Work Unit 004 11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. R E P O R T D A T E Directorate of Military Programs ^ May 1979 Office, Chief of Engineers 13. N U M B E R O F P A G ES Washington, D.C. 20314 1 2 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(7/ different from Controlling Office) 15. S E C U R IT Y CLASS, (of thia report) Unclassified 15a. DECL ASSI FI CATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report) Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abatract entered in Block 20, if different from Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. K E Y WORDS (Continue on reverse aide if necesaary and identify by block number) Infrared radiation Optical properties Reflection Snow 2Qv ABSTRACT (C o n tìn u e en reverse atxtm ft naceaeary and. identity by block number) A theory of the optical properties of snow in the 2-20 jjtm region of the infrared has been developed. Using this theory it is possible to predict the absorption and scattering coefficients and the emissivity of snow, as a function of the snow parameters of grain size and density, for densities between 0.17 and 0.4 g/cm3. The absorption and scattering coefficients are linearly related to the density and inversely related to the average grain size. The emissivity is independent of grain size and exhibits only a weak dependence upon density. DD U73 EDITION OF t NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered) PREFACE This report was prepared by Roger H. Berger, Research Physicist, of the Physical Sciences Branch, Research Division, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Funding for this project was provided by DA Project 4A762730AT42, Design, Construction and Operations Technoiogy for Cold Regions, Technical area A1, ice and Snow Technology, Work Unit 004, Camouflage and Decoy Techniques in Winter Environments. The author gratefully acknowledges the interest and suggestions of Dr. Y.C. Yen and Dr. S.C. Colbeck, who technically reviewed the manuscript of this report. ii NOMENCLATURE a particle radius C single particle cross section E energy f fraction of the snowpack surface occupied by ice particles H irradiance K absorption coefficient N number of particles/unit volume n refractive index Q factor used to convert the transmission coefficient to the transmissivity and assure the con­ servation of radiant energy at an interface R reflectivity T transmissivity X extinction coefficient 7 radiation phase change produced by transmission across a boundary e emissivity r \ radiation phase change produced by reflection at a boundary 0 angle of incidence or coaltitude X wavelength p density a scattering coefficient f skin depth <t> angle of refraction azimuth angle Subscripts c cavity, denotes the emissivity associated with the pores on the snowpack surface i ice, incident and imaginary used as p }, 0j and /7j, respectively r real s snow, denotes properties associated with the bulk snowpack ab absorption ext extinction sc scattering tr transmitted iii SNOWPACK OPTICAL PROPERTIES IN THE INFRARED Roger H. Berger INTRODUCTION and transmission coefficients and the emissivity of a snowpack from its mean grain size and density. The interaction of electromagnetic radiation with a As shown in Figure 1, the infrared region of the natural snow cover is of considerable practical interest electromagnetic spectrum extends from about 0.8 to and scientific importance. The remote sensing com­ 1000 jum, but absorption by yarious atmospheric con­ munity requires an improved understanding of the op­ stituents limits most infrared remote sensing to two tical properties of snow in order to correctly interpret atmospheric windows at 3-5 and 8-14 /jm. The theory the imagery of snow-covered regions and to distinguish of the infrared optical properties of snow developed in between snowpacks and cloud covers. Radiant energy this report is valid for wavelengths between 2 and 20 transfer is important in the thermodynamics and meta­ pm, the region most useful for remote sensing. morphosis of the snowpack and is therefore of inter­ est to those who study the mechanical and hydrologi­ cal properties of the snowpack. Therefore, the estab­ THE MODEL lishment o f relationships between the optical proper­ ties o f snow and frequently measured snowpack Radiation incident upon the snowpack surface under­ quantities, such as grain size and density, would be of goes either single or multiple interactions as illustrated considerable utility. A model is proposed in this re­ in Figure 2. These multiple interactions have been port for estimating the infrared absorption, reflection treated by Dunkle and Gler (1955) and Bergen (1970) o Visible A /J. m cm m -----------------IO11----- IO2 IO3 IO0 IO1 IO2 IOH IO0 IO1 10° a. The electromagnetic spectrum. ----- r ------- --------1 mr * r~ " i '1 t er S 1— Î " '2 I I1 'U H F1 v h f X-Rays uv P ; I R ■ Radio * Expanded Area b. Designations within the infrared region o f the electromagnetic spectrum. c. A tmospheric transmission in the infrared showing the principal atmos­ pheric constituents causing absorp­ tion. The horizontal arrows indi­ cate the atmospheric "windows” through which most remote sensing in the infrared is done. Figure 7. The electromagnetic spectrum. Incident applicable to this model two conditions have to be satisfied. First, the particles must be large compared to the wavelength of the radiation. Second, the inter­ granular spacing must be large compared to the average grain dimensions. The first condition is easily satisfied, since for most snows, the mean grain diameter is more than an order of magnitude larger than 20 pm, the maximum wavelength considered here. The second implies that the geometrical optics approach is valid only for low-density snow. The range of snow densities for which this assumption is valid will be examined more closely in relation to the results of the theory. RADIANT INTERACTIONS If we consider a single grain within the snowpack, it emits radiation isotropically and is immersed in the flux of radiation from the surrounding grains. Let us con­ sider this external radiation flux as a plane wave and examine the interaction between it and an ice particle. Figure 2. Interaction between electromagnetic radia­ This incident radiation of intensity H will either be tion and the surface layer o f ice particles in a snow- absorbed or scattered and these processes can be des­ pack. The solid lines represent the incident radiation , cribed in terms of the single particle cross sections Cab the dotted lines represent radiation that is specularly for absorption and for scattering. These cross sec­ reflected either singly or m ultiply , and the bold dashed tions are defined by the ratios of the energy absorbed lines represent refracted and absorbed radiation. or scattered to the incident flux: and Giddings and LaChapelle (1961) as a radiative Cab s f ° r absorption (1a) transfer or diffusion problem in a continuum. If the work of these authors is extended from the visible to and infrared wavelengths, problems arise due to the large absorption coefficient of ice in the infrared. Csc = F sc/H for scattering. (1b) A much simpler approach to this scattering prob­ lem and one which is easily adaptable to the longer in­ By the law of conservation of energy these cross sections frared wavelengths is to look at the problem in terms are related to the extinction cross section: of geometrical optics (Bohren and Barkstrom 1974). A rigorous treatment of the snowpack model proposed ^ext ^ab+^sc* (2) in this report would require Mie scattering theory, but the arbitrary shapes of the actual ice grains within the With the initial assumption of a random distribution of snowpack make this refinement unnecessary. grains spaced relatively far apart, these cross sections may be related to the bulk material absorption, scatter­ ing and extinction coefficients by SNOWPACK DESCRIPTION *s = C*N (3a) The snowpack model proposed is a random distri­ bution of spherical ice grains immersed in a nonabsorb­ o , = C scN (3b) ing medium. Below the plane which defines the sur­ face of the snowpack, the grain distribution is homo­ X s = C eMN . (3c) geneous and isotropic and may be characterized by the mean grain radius a, the density of ice pj and the The assumptions of large grain separation and random snow density p s.
Recommended publications
  • Principles of Optics
    Principles of optics Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light MAX BORN MA, Dr Phil, FRS Nobel Laureate Formerly Professor at the Universities of Göttingen and Edinburgh and EMIL WOLF PhD, DSc Wilson Professor of Optical Physics, University of Rochester, NY with contributions by A.B.BHATIA, P.C.CLEMMOW, D.GABOR, A.R.STOKES, A.M.TAYLOR, P.A.WAYMAN AND W.L.WILCOCK SEVENTH (EXPANDED) EDITION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Historical introduction xxv I Basic properties of the electromagnetic field 1 1.1 The electromagnetic field 1 1.1.1 Maxwells equations 1 1.1.2 Material equations 2 1.1.3 Boundary conditions at a surface of discontinuity 4 1.1.4 The energy law of the electromagnetic field 7 1.2 The wave equation and the velocity of light 11 1.3 Scalar waves 14 1.3.1 Plane waves 15 1.3.2 Spherical waves 16 1.3.3 Harmonie waves. The phase velocity 16 1.3.4 Wave packets. The group velocity 19 1.4 Vector waves 24 1.4.1 The general electromagnetic plane wave 24 1.4.2 The harmonic electromagnetic plane wave 25 (a) Elliptic polarization 25 (b) Linear and circular polarization 29 (c) Characterization of the state of polarization by Stoltes parameters 31 1.4.3 Harmonie vector waves of arbitrary form 33 1.5 Reflection and refraction of a plane wave 38 1.5.1 The laws of reflection and refraction 38 1.5.2 Fresnel formulae 40 1.5.3 The reflectivity and transmissivity; polarization an reflection and refraction 43 1.5.4 Total reflection 49 1.6 Wave propagation in a stratified medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquiumcolloquium
    ColloquiumColloquium History and solution of the phase problem in the theory of structure determination of crystals from X-ray diffraction experiments Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy Institute of Optics University of Rochester 3:45 pm, Wednesday, Nov 18, 2009 B.Sc. and Ph.D. Bristol University Baush & Lomb 109 D.Sc. University of Edinburgh U. of Rochester 1959 - Tea 3:30 B&L Lobby Wilson Professor of Optical Physics JointlyJointly sponsoredsponsored byby The most important researches carried out in this field will be reviewed and a recently DepartmentDepartment ofof PhysicsPhysics andand AstronomyAstronomy obtained solution of the phase problem will be presented. History and solution of the phase problem in the theory of structure determination of crystals from X-ray diffraction experiments Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy and The Institute of Optics University of Rochester Abstract Since the pioneering work of Max von Laue on interference and diffraction of X-rays carried out almost a hundred years ago, numerous attempts have been made to determine structures of crystalline media from X-ray diffraction experiments. Usefulness of all of them has been limited by the inability of measuring phases of the diffracted beams. In this talk the most important researches carried out in this field will be reviewed and a recently obtained solution of the phase problem will be presented. Biography Emil Wolf is Wilson Professor of Optical Physics at the University of Rochester, and is reknowned for his work in physical optics. He has received many awards, including the Ives Medal of the Optical Society of America, the Albert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Principles of Physical Optics 1St Edition Free Ebook
    PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL OPTICS 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Charles A Bennett | --- | --- | --- | 9780470122129 | --- | --- Principles Of Adaptive Optics If you wish to place a tax exempt order please contact us. He has collaborated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory sincewhere he is currently an adjunct research and development associate Principles of Physical Optics 1st edition the Advanced Laser and Optical Technology and Development group. Magnetic Lenses. Connect with:. A beginning might be the recalling of one's career-long association with it. All Pages Books Journals. When I asked for it, he argued that as a theorist he had a greater need for the book than I, an experimentalist, did. Principles of Physical Optics Bennett, Charles a. Complete Electron Guns. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. Physical Optics. This includes detailed discussions on geometric optics, superposition and interference, and diffraction. Institutional Subscription. If you wish to place a tax exempt order please Principles of Physical Optics 1st edition us. This includes detailed discussions on. Breathing a breath of fresh air into the field of optics, Principles of Principles of Physical Optics 1st edition Optics is the first new entry in the field in the last 20 years. Another colleague borrowed my newly-purchased copy and was slow to return it. Readers will also find the latest information on lasers, optical imaging, polarization, and nonlinear optics. Seller Rating:. Thanks in advance for your time. Systematically describes a number of sub-topics in the field. About the Author Charles A. In physical optics, the wave property of light is considered. Additional Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1604.01800V1 [Physics.Optics]
    BIREFRINGENCE PHENOMENA REVISITED Dante D. Pereira1, Baltazar J. Ribeiro2 and Bruno Gon¸calves3 1Centro Federal de Educa¸c˜ao Tecnol´ogica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET-RJ, 27.600-000, Valen¸ca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2Centro Federal de Educa¸c˜ao Tecnol´ogica de Minas Gerais CEFET-MG, 37.250-000, Nepomuceno, Minas Gerais, Brazil 3Instituto Federal de Educa¸c˜ao, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais IF Sudeste MG, 36080-001, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil Abstract The propagation of electromagnetic waves is investigated in the context of the isotropic and nonlinear dielectric media at rest in the eikonal limit of the geometrical optics. Taking into account the functional dependence ε = ε(E,B) and µ = µ(E,B) for the dielectric coefficients, a set of phenomena related to the birefringence of the electromagnetic waves induced by external fields are derived and discussed. Our results contemplate the known cases already reported in the literature: Kerr, Cotton-Mouton, Jones and magnetoelectric effects. Moreover, new effects are presented here as well as the perspectives of its experimental confirmations. PACS numbers: 03.50.De, 04.20.-q, 42.25.Lc 1 Introduction Electromagnetic waves in nonlinear media propagate according to Maxwell’s equations com- plemented by certain phenomenological constitutive relations linking strengths and induced fields [1]. Depending on the dielectric properties of the medium and also on the presence of applied external fields, a variety of optical effects can be found. One of such an effects which has received significant attention of the scientific community in the last years is the birefringence phenomenon (or duble refraction) [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals
    1 Fundamentals 1.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF FEMTOSECOND LIGHT PULSES Femtosecond (fs) light pulses are electromagnetic wave packets and as such are fully described by the time and space dependent electric field. In the frame of a semiclassical treatment the propagation of such fields and the interaction with matter are governed by Maxwell’s equations with the material response given by a macroscopic polarization. In this first chapter we will summarize the essential notations and definitions used throughout the book. The pulse is characterized by measurable quantities that can be directly related to the electric field. A complex representation of the field amplitude is particularly convenient in dealing with propagation problems of electromagnetic pulses. The next section expands on the choice of field representation. 1.1.1. Complex Representation of the Electric Field Let us consider first the temporal dependence of the electric field neglecting its spatial and polarization dependence, i.e., E(x, y, z, t) = E(t). A complete description can be given either in the time or the frequency domain. Even though the measured quantities are real, it is generally more convenient to use complex representation. For this reason, starting with the real E(t), one defines the complex 1 2 Fundamentals spectrum of the field strength E˜ (), through the complex Fourier transform (F): ∞ − E˜ () = F {E(t)} = E(t)e itdt =|E˜ ()|ei() (1.1) −∞ In the definition (1.1), |E˜ ()| denotes the spectral amplitude, and ()isthe spectral phase. Here and in what follows, complex quantities related to the field are typically written with a tilde. Because E(t) is a real function, E˜ () = E˜ ∗(−) holds.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Physics (14) Recollections of Max Born
    Nr. 47 November 2015 SPG MITTEILUNGEN COMMUNICATIONS DE LA SSP AUSZUG - EXTRAIT History of Physics (14) Recollections of Max Born Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA This article has been downloaded from: http://www.sps.ch/fileadmin/articles-pdf/2015/Mitteilungen_History_14.pdf © see http://www.sps.ch/bottom_menu/impressum/ SPG Mitteilungen Nr. 47 History of Physics (14) At the end of the International Year of Light IYL2015 of the UNESCO we would like to remember one of the pioneers of modern optics, Max Born. Based on his Optik from 1933, Born and his assistant Emil Wolf published 1959 the Principles of Optics, Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, even today one of the most read mon- ographies in optics. They did not only describe the known physics of light at that time in a rigorous, elegant mathematical diction, but also worked out visionarily the basics of modern photonics, i.e. the important role of coherence functions and their propagation. It was more than a lucky coincidence that only one year later after their opus magnum was published, the laser was invented (1960). This nearly simultaneous appearance of the theory of coherent light sources and its hardware realization was a major reason to catapult optics to its modern variant, the photonics. We are very happy that Emil Wolf al- lowed us to reprint his memories of the history of the ‘Born & Wolf’. Bernhard Braunecker Recollections of Max Born Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Foundations of the Theory of Special Relativity: Stellar Aberration and the Fizeau Experiment
    Rethinking the Foundations of the Theory of Special Relativity: Stellar Aberration and the Fizeau Experiment 1 2 A.F. Maers and R. Wayne 1Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA 2Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853 USA In a previous paper published in this journal, we described a new relativistic wave equation that accounts for the propagation of light from a source to an observer in two different inertial frames. This equation, which is based on the primacy of the Doppler effect, can account for the relativity of simultaneity and the observation that charged particles cannot exceed the speed of light. In contrast to the Special Theory of Relativity, it does so without the necessity of introducing the relativity of space and time. Here we show that the new relativistic wave equation based on the primacy of the Doppler effect is quantitatively more accurate than the standard theory based on the Fresnel drag coefficient or the relativity of space and time in accounting for the results of Fizeau’s experiment on the optics of moving media—the very experiment that Einstein considered to be “a crucial test in favour of the theory of relativity.” The new relativistic wave equation quantitatively describes other observations involving the optics of moving bodies, including stellar aberration and the null results of the Michelson- Morley experiment. In this paper, we propose an experiment to test the influence of the refractive index on the interference fringe shift generated by moving media. The Special Theory of Relativity, which is based on the relativity of space and time, and the new relativistic wave equation, which is based on the primacy of the Doppler effect, make different predictions concerning the influence of the refractive index on the optics of moving media.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Quantum Optics
    This page intentionally left blank Introductory Quantum Optics This book provides an elementary introduction to the subject of quantum optics, the study of the quantum-mechanical nature of light and its interaction with matter. The presentation is almost entirely concerned with the quantized electromag- netic field. Topics covered include single-mode field quantization in a cavity, quantization of multimode fields, quantum phase, coherent states, quasi- probability distribution in phase space, atom–field interactions, the Jaynes– Cummings model, quantum coherence theory, beam splitters and interferom- eters, nonclassical field states with squeezing etc., tests of local realism with entangled photons from down-conversion, experimental realizations of cavity quantum electrodynamics, trapped ions, decoherence, and some applications to quantum information processing, particularly quantum cryptography. The book contains many homework problems and a comprehensive bibliography. This text is designed for upper-level undergraduates taking courses in quantum optics who have already taken a course in quantum mechanics, and for first- and second-year graduate students. A solutions manual is available to instructors via [email protected]. C G is Professor of Physics at Lehman College, City Uni- versity of New York.He was one of the first to exploit the use of group theoretical methods in quantum optics and is also a frequent contributor to Physical Review A.In1992 he co-authored, with A. Inomata and H. Kuratsuji, Path Integrals and Coherent States for Su (2) and SU (1, 1). P K is a leading figure in quantum optics, and in addition to being President of the Optical Society of America in 2004, he is a Fellow of the Royal Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Optics
    Principles of optics Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light MAX BORN MA, Dr Phil, FRS Nobel Laureate Formerly Professor at the Universities of GoÈttingen and Edinburgh and EMIL WOLF PhD, DSc Wilson Professor of Optical Physics, University of Rochester, NY with contributions by A.B.BHATIA, P.C.CLEMMOW, D.GABOR, A.R.STOKES, A.M.TAYLOR, P.A.WAYMAN AND W.L.WILCOCK SEVENTH !EXPANDED) EDITION publishedby thepress syndicate oftheuniversityofcambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridgeuniversity press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC3207, Australia Ruiz de AlarcoÂn 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org Seventh !expanded) edition # Margaret Farley-Born and Emil Wolf 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1959 by Pergamon Press Ltd, London Sixth edition 1980 Reprinted !with corrections) 1983, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1993 Reissued by Cambridge University Press 1997 Seventh !expanded) edition 1999 Reprinted with corrections, 2002 Reprinted 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47743-7 — Principles of Optics 7th Edition Frontmatter More Information Principles of Optics Principles of Optics is one of the most highly cited and most influential physics books ever published, and one of the classic science books of the twentieth century. To celebrate the 60th anniversary of this remarkable book’s first publication, the seventh expanded edition has been reprinted with a special foreword by Sir Peter Knight. The seventh edition was the first thorough revision and expansion of this definitive text. Amongst the material introduced in the seventh edition is a section on CAT scans, a chapter on scattering from inhomogeneous media, including an account of the principles of diffraction tomography, an account of scattering from periodic potentials, and a section on the so-called Rayleigh-Sommerfield diffraction theory. This expansive and timeless book continues to be invaluable to advanced undergraduates, graduate students and researchers working in all areas of optics. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47743-7 — Principles of Optics 7th Edition Frontmatter More Information To the Memory of Sir Ernest Oppenheimer © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47743-7 — Principles of Optics 7th Edition Frontmatter More Information Principles ofO ptics MAX BORN MA, Dr Phil, FRS Nobel Laureate Formerly Professor at the Universities of GoÈttingen and Edinburgh and EMIL WOLF
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquiumcolloquium
    ColloquiumColloquium Unified Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light and Some of Its Applications Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy Institute of Optics Special Time University of Rochester B.Sc. and Ph.D. Bristol University 2:30 pm, Monday, March 2, 2009 D.Sc. University of Edinburgh U. of Rochester 1959 - Sloan Auditorium, Goergen Building Wilson Professor of Optical Physics Refreshments provided Review of recent developments in the theories of coherence and polarization of light and application showing previously unknown aspects of the JointlyJointly sponsoredsponsored byby Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect. DepartmentDepartm ent ofof PhysicsPhysics andand AstronomyAstronomy Unified Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light and Some of Its Applications Emil Wolf Department of Physics and Astronomy and The Institute of Optics University of Rochester Abstract After a brief review of the developments of the theories of coherence and polarization of light, an account will be given of a recently formulated unified theory of these two subjects. Examples of applications of the theory will then be given which elucidates changes of the state of polarization of a light beam propagating in free space, in fibers and in the turbulent atmosphere. It will also be shown that the unified theory reveals previously unknown aspects of the so-called Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect, originally introduced for measurements of stellar diameters and, more recently, applied to problems in high energy physics, nuclear physics and condensed matter physics. Biography Emil Wolf is Wilson Professor of Optical Physics at the University of Rochester, and is reknowned for his work in physical optics. He has received many awards, including the Ives Medal of the Optical Society of America, the Albert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality and the Probability Wave
    Reality and the Probability Wave Daniel Shanahan PO Box 301, Raby Bay, Queensland, Australia, 4163 April 4, 2019 Abstract Effects associated in quantum mechanics with a divisible probability wave are explained as physically real consequences of the equal but op- posite reaction of the apparatus as a particle is measured. Taking as illustration a Mach-Zehnder interferometer operating by refraction, it is shown that this reaction must comprise a fluctuation in the reradiation field of complementary effect to the changes occurring in the photon as it is projected into one or other path. The evolution of this fluctuation through the experiment will explain the alternative states of the particle discerned in self interference, while the maintenance of equilibrium in the face of such fluctuations becomes the source of the Born probabilities. In this scheme, the probability wave is a mathematical artifact, epistemic rather than ontic, and akin in this respect to the simplifying constructions of geometrical optics. Keywords probability wave measurement problem self interference Schrödinger’s cat Mach-Zehnder· interferometer local· realism · · · 1 Introduction It seems to have been Max Born who first referred to the waves of probability (Wahrscheinlichkeitswellen) which released from the usual binds of reality have provided an elegant and for practical purposes highly successful explanation of the phenomenon of self interference (Born [1]). Yet these probability waves are no less mysterious than the mystery they were invoked to explain. It can hardly be doubted that as a particle passes through an interferometer, such as the Mach-Zehnder of Fig. 1, something wave-like must be moving through both arms.
    [Show full text]