DOCSLIB.ORG

Dáil Éireann

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 746 Tuesday, No. 3 15 November 2011 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Dé Máirt, 15 Samhain 2011. Business of Dáil ……………………………… 417 Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Finance Priority Questions …………………………… 417 Other Questions …………………………… 428 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 437 Visit of Scottish Delegation …………………………… 445 Ceisteanna — Questions (resumed) Taoiseach ………………………………… 446 Termination of Ministerial Appointment: Announcement by Taoiseach …………… 464 Order of Business ……………………………… 464 Suspension of Member……………………………… 472 Topical Issue Matters ……………………………… 474 Topical Issue Debate Sale of Booterstown Marsh ………………………… 475 Banking Sector Regulation ………………………… 477 Northern Ireland Issues …………………………… 480 Stroke Services ……………………………… 482 Order of Referral of the Access to Central Treasury Funds (Commission for Energy Regulation) Bill 2011 [Seanad] to the Select Sub-Committee on Communications, Energy and Natural Resources: Motion to Rescind ………………………… 484 Dormant Accounts (Amendment) Bill 2011 [Seanad]: Second Stage …………… 485 Message from Select Committee ………………………… 497 Private Members’ Business Mental Health Services: Motion ………………………… 498 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 519 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Máirt, 15 Samhain 2011. Tuesday, 15 November 2011. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.00 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Business of Dáil An Ceann Comhairle: I am pleased to inform Members that as of 2 p.m. today, the pro- ceedings of the House will be broadcast live on channel 801 on the UPC network, as part of a trial initiative for a period of six months. This trial is being provided at no cost to the Exchequer. As Ceann Comhairle, I am particularly pleased that the notion of increased access to the work of Parliament and its Members is being enhanced with the launch of this initiative. I would like particularly to record my thanks to Dana Strong, chief executive of UPC Ireland, and her team, who have been innovative in their approach and who have proven their commit- ment to this project from the start. I am excited by the possibilities of this project and I hope that the public will use this facility to follow the work of the Houses of the Oireachtas. I would also like to welcome Dana Strong from UPC to the Distinguished Visitors Gallery. Ceisteanna — Questions Priority Questions ———— Fiscal Policy 29. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will explain his logic for opting for a budget adjustment of €3.8 billion in 2012; if he intends to adjust the scale of the fiscal adjustment during the year if the economic growth target of 1.6% is not being achieved and the data indicates that a greater fiscal adjustment is required to achieve the 8.6% deficit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34882/11] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan) (Deputy Michael Noonan): The terms of the EU-IMF programme require Ireland to achieve a general Government deficit of no more than 8.6% of GDP in 2012. Based on the macroeconomic and fiscal assessment set out in the medium-term fiscal statement, a €3.8 billion adjustment is therefore required in 2012 to meet this deficit target. My Department set out its latest forecasts in the medium-term fiscal state- ment. GDP growth of 1.6% is projected for next year. The Reuters consensus forecast for the end of October was 1.5% for 2012, broadly in line with my Department’s views. 417 Priority 15 November 2011. Questions [Deputy Michael Noonan.] Given the current uncertainties in the global economic and financial environment, chapter 5 of the medium-term fiscal statement is dedicated to analysing the risks to the economic and budgetary outlook. This chapter also provides estimates of the impact on both the general Government balance and general Government debt of lower and also higher rates of economic growth. Clearly, if growth is weaker than currently anticipated, this will make the achievement of the 2012 deficit target more difficult, all else being equal. Generally speaking, taking account of the inherent uncertainty in macroeconomic and fiscal forecasting, the Department’s current working assessment is that the risks to the outlook are broadly balanced. That said, I am not going to speculate here, in mid-November, about an eventuality that may or may not arise. The Government’s focus now is on delivering a budget for 2012 which will implement a set of measures in as fair and equitable a manner as possible that will allow for the achievement of next year’s deficit target. The Government is committed to ensuring that the deficit target of 8.6% of GDP is achieved. Deputy Michael McGrath: I thank the Minister for his response. We all hope the tentative recovery in our economy that we are witnessing takes root and develops further in 2012. The forecast for 2012 is for an adjustment of €3.8 billion, yielding a deficit of 8.6% on the button. There is therefore no room whatsoever for slippage on the outturn for 2011, on the income and expenditure side for 2012, or indeed on the growth side for 2012. What might cause alarm is the fact that the European Commission has predicted that growth in Ireland next year will be 1.1%, which is a full half percent less than what the Department of Finance estimates. If that were to materialise — and we hope it does not — it would result in the need for an extra adjustment of about half a billion euro to bring the deficit within 8.6% of GDP. Is the Minister concerned that we may still be too optimistic on the growth side for 2012? If we are being overly optimistic, and that becomes clear in the early part of next year, is he committed to achieving a deficit of 8.6%, come what may? Deputy Michael Noonan: Forecasting is always an inexact science. What we have to do is to use the best information available to come to a judgment on what growth rates may be in the following year. It is generally recognised in the European Union that Ireland has now returned to significant growth rates which are at present in advance of those of most of our colleague countries in the EU. The Deputy is probably aware that the CSO revisited the growth figures for the first quarter of this year and it now agrees that growth in the first quarter was 1.9%, which is significant. Last April we were looking at growth, on the basis of reasonable forecasts, of 2.5% for next year. In preparing the budget we have marked that down by 0.9%, which is a significant amount. Writers who tabulate the various forecasts have pitched a mid-range figure of 1.5%, and we are in line with that. I hope we will actually beat these figures, but I can assure the Deputy these are the forecasts produced by the forecasting section of the Department of Finance, with no political input, and we think they are prudent and the risks are balanced. One could cite risks on the down-side, but one could also cite risks on the up-side, so I think they are balanced. Deputy Michael McGrath: I am sure the Minister will agree that the pattern in recent times from the Department of Finance has been to be overly optimistic in its growth projections. Unfortunately, that is what we have seen. We all hope the projections will not transpire in 2012 and that growth surpasses what it has predicted, but it has predicted a level of growth for the Irish economy in excess of three times what the European Commission is forecasting for Europe generally. We are trying to achieve an export-led recovery but since many of our main trading partners in the European Union are experiencing sluggish growth, to say the least, this 418 Priority 15 November 2011. Questions poses a real threat to the prospects of an export-led recovery. The key question is how sacro- sanct is getting to a figure of 8.6% on the button next year. If growth does not materialise — we hope it does — will there be a requirement for adjustments mid-year to ensure we come in on target? Deputy Michael Noonan: I do not agree with the Deputy that the Department of Finance has erred on the side of optimism in recent years. It has been close enough to the average in its forecasts. Sometimes it has been slightly above and sometimes below. It predicted a growth rate of 0.8% in 2011 and it has now marked up this rate to 1%. This makes it easier at year’s end because if one considers the correction made in the CSO figures of 1.9% in the first quarter and 1.3% in the second quarter, one would need it to come back significantly to get it down to 1% for the full year. The anecdotal evidence suggests export-led growth is continuing through the third quarter. As I have stated already, this is rather inexact and we must work on the best information available to us. We should be cognisant as well that other forecasters are at work, some of whom are more pessimistic and others who are more optimistic. Those in the ESRI have always tended to be more optimistic than the Department of Finance and, historically, they have proven to be correct. They are more optimistic on this occasion. Let us hope they are right. Banking Sector Regulation 30. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he has received the report from the Financial Regulator regarding the additional powers required to force banks to pass on ECB interest rate reductions to customers; if so, if he will outline the contents of this report; if he will proceed with the necessary emergency legislation on this matter irrespective of whether the regulator requests additional powers or not; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Recommended publications
  • Identity, Authority and Myth-Making: Politically-Motivated Prisoners and the Use of Music During the Northern Irish Conflict, 1962 - 2000

    Identity, Authority and Myth-Making: Politically-Motivated Prisoners and the Use of Music During the Northern Irish Conflict, 1962 - 2000

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Identity, authority and myth-making: Politically-motivated prisoners and the use of music during the Northern Irish conflict, 1962 - 2000 Claire Alexandra Green Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, Claire Alexandra Green, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: 29/04/19 Details of collaboration and publications: ‘It’s All Over: Romantic Relationships, Endurance and Loyalty in the Songs of Northern Irish Politically-Motivated Prisoners’, Estudios Irlandeses, 14, 70-82. 2 Abstract. In this study I examine the use of music by and in relation to politically-motivated prisoners in Northern Ireland, from the mid-1960s until 2000.
  • Bar Review July 2006 Design: the Design Room T: 497 9022 Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 497 3389 E: Bdgallagher@Eircom.Net W

    Bar Review July 2006 Design: the Design Room T: 497 9022 Cover Illustration: Brian Gallagher T: 497 3389 E: [email protected] W

    The BarJournal of the Bar Reviewof Ireland .Volume 12 . Issue 4 . July 2006 • Environmental Impact Assessments and recent EU law • The Haran Report on Legal Costs • Eurofood and EU Insolvency regulation BarThe Review Volume 11,Issue 4, July 2006, ISSN 1339 - 3426 Contents 106 News 107 The Haran Report on Legal Costs Editorial Correspondence to: Colm O’Dwyer BL Eilis Brennan BL, The Editor, 111 Eurofood IFSC Limited: Judicial Clarification of Insolvency Bar Review, Regulation 1346/2000 Law Library, Glen Gibbons BL Four Courts, Dublin 7 Mark O’Riordan BL DX 813154 Telephone: 353-1-817 5505 Fax: 353-1-872 0455 e-mail: [email protected] 117 Legal Update: A Guide to Legal Developments from Editor: Eilis Brennan BL 4th May, 2006 to 23rd June, 2006. Editorial Board: Paul Gallagher SC 129 Development Consents and the EIA Directive (Chairman, Editorial Board) Garrett Simons BL Gerry Durcan SC Mary O’Toole SC 133 Misuse of Drugs provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill Patrick Dillon Malone BL Conor Dignam BL Gerard Murphy B.L. Adele Murphy BL 136 Lawyers in Afghanistan Brian Kennedy BL Vincent Browne BL Jeanne McDonagh Mark O’Connell BL Paul A. McDermott BL 137 The Constitution and Marriage; The Scope of Protection Tom O’Malley BL John Eardly BL Patrick Leonard BL Paul McCarthy BL Des Mulhere The Bar Review is published by Thomson Round Hall in association with The Bar Council of Ireland. Jeanne McDonagh For all subscription queries contact: Jerry Carroll Thomson Round Hall Consultant Editors 43 Fitzwilliam Place, Dublin 2 Dermot Gleeson SC Telephone: + 353 1 662 5301 Fax: + 353 1 662 5302 Patrick MacEntee SC Email: [email protected] web: www.roundhall.ie Thomas McCann SC Subscriptions: January 2006 to December 2006 - 6 issues Eoghan Fitzsimons SC Annual Subscription: E195.00 Donal O’Donnell SC E Annual Subscription + Bound Volume Service 300.00 Garrett Cooney SC For all advertising queries contact: Pat Hanratty SC Tom Clark, Direct line: 44 20 7393 7835 E-Mail: [email protected] James O’Reilly SC Directories Unit.
  • Aguisíní Appendices Aguisín 1: Comóradh Céad Bliain Ollscoil Na Héireann Appendix 1: Centenary of the National University of Ireland

    Aguisíní Appendices Aguisín 1: Comóradh Céad Bliain Ollscoil Na Héireann Appendix 1: Centenary of the National University of Ireland

    Aguisíní Appendices Aguisín 1: Comóradh Céad Bliain Ollscoil na hÉireann Appendix 1: Centenary of the National University of Ireland Píosa reachtaíochta stairiúil ab ea Acht Ollscoileanna na hÉireann, 1908, a chuir deireadh go foirmeálta le tréimhse shuaite in oideachas tríú leibhéal na hEireann agus a d’oscail caibidil nua agus nuálaíoch: a bhunaigh dhá ollscoil ar leith – ceann amháin díobh i mBéal Feirste, in ionad sean-Choláiste na Ríona den Ollscoil Ríoga, agus an ceann eile lárnaithe i mBaile Átha Cliath, ollscoil fheidearálach ina raibh coláistí na hOllscoile Ríoga de Bhaile Átha Cliath, Corcaigh agus Gaillimh, athchumtha mar Chomh-Choláistí d’Ollscoil nua na hÉirean,. Sa bhliain 2008, rinne OÉ ceiliúradh ar chéad bliain ar an saol. Is iomaí athrú suntasach a a tharla thar na mblianta, go háiriithe nuair a ritheadh Acht na nOllscoileanna i 1997, a rinneadh na Comh-Choláistí i mBaile Átha Cliath, Corcaigh agus Gaillimh a athbhunú mar Chomh-Ollscoileanna, agus a rinneadh an Coláiste Aitheanta (Coláiste Phádraig, Má Nuad) a athstruchtúrú mar Ollscoil na hÉireann, Má Nuad – Comh-Ollscoil nua. Cuireadh tús le comóradh an chéid ar an 3 Nollaig 2007 agus chríochnaigh an ceiliúradh le mórchomhdháil agus bronnadh céime speisialta ar an 3 Nollaig 2008. Comóradh céad bliain ón gcéad chruinniú de Sheanad OÉ ar an lá céanna a nochtaíodh protráid den Seansailéirm, an Dr. Garret FitzGerald. Tá liosta de na hócáidí ar fad thíos. The Irish Universities Act 1908 was a historic piece of legislation, formally closing a turbulent chapter in Irish third level education and opening a new and innovational chapter: establishing two separate universities, one in Belfast, replacing the old Queen’s College of the Royal University, the other with its seat in Dublin, a federal university comprising the Royal University colleges of Dublin, Cork and Galway, re-structured as Constituent Colleges of the new National University of Ireland.
  • Report of the Public

    Report of the Public

    REPORT OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SYSTEM STUDY GROUP CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Public Prosecution System Study Group (PPSSG) was appointed by the government in October 1998 under the auspices of the Office of the Attorney General and was addressed by the Attorney, Mr David Byrne SC, at its first meeting on 2 November 1998. The Attorney outlined the background to the government’s decision to establish the group. Terms of reference 1.2 The terms of reference of the Study Group are: 1. To review the legal and organisational arrangements for the public prosecution system and, in particular, to consider o whether there is a continuing role for gardaí to prosecute as well as to investigate crime; o whether all prosecutions should be conducted by lawyers; o whether, and in what circumstances, prosecutions should be conducted by a. barristers or solicitors employed by the Director of Public Prosecutions as prosecutors, b. independent practitioners at the Bar, c. independent solicitors who have a contractualrelationship with the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Attorney General or his Office (including the Office of the Chief State Solicitor), d. solicitors employed by the Attorney General or his Office, e. members of the Garda Síochána; o whether there should be any changes in the functions of the Criminal Trials Section of the Chief State Solicitor’s Office and local State Solicitor’s Office, local State Solicitors and the Director of Public Prosecutions and his Office. 1. To consider whether aspects of the public prosecution system in comparable jurisdictions could, with advantage, be adopted here.
  • Northern Ireland Current Political Developments

    Northern Ireland Current Political Developments

    Northern Ireland Current political developments Research Paper 96/52 17 April 1996 This paper looks at the legal constitutional, and electoral framework of Northern Ireland, and provides a chronology of events in the political and constitutional arena since 1972. It also gives statistics on casualties connected with civil disturbances, strength of the security services, and votes cast at Northern Ireland elections since 1972. Finally it gives a brief description of the Northern Ireland (Entry to Negotiations etc) Bill [Bill 105 of 1995-96] which is due to have its Second Reading on 18 April 1996, together with the Command Paper published with the Bill: Northern Ireland: Ground Rules for Substantive All-Party Negotiations (Cm 3232). The statistical section of the paper also contains a look at how the electoral system set out in the Bill might work in practice. Oonagh Gay Rob Clements Home Affairs Section Social and General Statistics Section House of Commons Library CONTENTS Page Part I Northern Ireland - the legal, and 5 electoral framework Part II Chronology of constitutional and political events 23 Part III Northern Ireland (Entry to Negotiations etc) Bill 63 Part IV Statistics relating to Northern Ireland 71 Appendix 1 Parliamentary debates on Northern Ireland 85 1972-1996 Appendix 2 Chronological List of Secretaries of State for Northern Ireland 94 Research Paper 96/52 Part I Northern Ireland - the legal and constitutional framework The Genesis of Northern Ireland in UK Law 1800 Union with Ireland Act. Article 1 enacted that the kingdoms of Ireland and Great Britain would, from January 1st 1801 and 'forever after, be united into one kingdom, by the name of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland'.
  • Responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

    Responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

    House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Oral Evidence Wednesday 6 November 2013 Rt Hon Mrs Theresa Villiers MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 November 2013 HC 798 Published on 23 December 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £6.00 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [23-12-2013 07:30] Job: 035313 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/035313/035313_o001_MP Corrected transcript SofS 06.11.13.xml Northern Ireland Committee: Evidence Ev 1 Oral evidence Taken before the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee on Wednesday 6 November 2013 Members present: Laurence Robertson (Chair) Mr David Anderson Kate Hoey Mr Joe Benton Nigel Mills Oliver Colvile Ian Paisley Mr Stephen Hepburn Andrew Percy Lady Hermon ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Rt Hon Mrs Theresa Villiers MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Julian King, Director General, and Mark Larmour, Deputy Director, Northern Ireland Office, gave evidence. Q1 Chair: We will start the public session. start-up loans scheme, which has been highly Secretary of State, you are very welcome. Thank you successful in England and Wales, is now rolled out in very much for joining us. There is a range of issues Northern Ireland. The banking taskforce established we would like to discuss with you. Perhaps you would under the pact has started its work and was helpful like to introduce your team and make a brief opening in providing some input into the recent decision on statement.
  • Attorney General V X: Feminist Judgment and Commentary

    Attorney General V X: Feminist Judgment and Commentary

    McGuinness, S., & Fletcher, R. (2017). Chapter 18 - Attorney General v X: Feminist Judgment and Commentary. In M. Enright, J. McCandless, & A. O'Donoghue (Eds.), Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity Hart Publishing. Peer reviewed version License (if available): Unspecified Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ 18 Commentary on Attorney General v X SHEELAGH MCGUINNESS Introduction This commentary reflects on the feminist judgment of Ruth Fletcher in the landmark case of Attorney General v X.1 This case involved an attempt to prevent a 14-year-old girl who was pregnant as a result of being raped from travelling to England in order to access abortion care. It is impossible to engage with this decision without a broader consideration of the harm that is wrought on the lives of women in Ireland by the Eighth amendment to the Irish Constitution: Article 40.3.3. The content of my commentary uses two frames of analysis developed in the work of academic Robin West.2 First, I consider West’s concept of ‘gendered harms’ in the spheres of reproduction and pregnancy. Joanne Conaghan summarises the concept of ‘gendered harms’ as ‘but one way of recognising that injury has a social as well as an individual dimension’ and an acknowledgement of the way in which harms can impact particular group members.3 Legal systems can compound and legitimate harms that are experienced disproportionately or solely by women, especially in the sphere of reproduction.4 This harm plays out differently depending on how gender interacts with other social dynamics such as ethnicity in the regulation of reproduction.
  • Born on One Side of Partition: Reassessing Lessons Of

    Born on One Side of Partition: Reassessing Lessons Of

    Executive Master’s in International Politics 2019-2020 Born on One Side of Partition: Reassessing Lessons of Northern Ireland’s Conflict from a st 21 -Century Multidisciplinary Perspective By JACQUELINE NOLAN Supervisor PROFESSOR GUY OLIVIER FAURE Professor of International Negotiation, Sorbonne University October 2020 i “History says, don’t hope On this side of the grave. But then, once in a lifetime The longed-for tidal wave Of justice can rise up, And hope and history rhyme." (Seamus Heaney, ‘The Cure at Troy’) The question is: whose history? ii Abstract In the wake of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, which brought an end to 30 years of conflict in Northern Ireland, the province became a ‘place of pilgrimage’ for people from other conflict zones in search of lessons and answers. This thesis revisits Northern Ireland’s lessons from a multidisciplinary and 21st-century perspective; it contends that to make sense of and resolve a conflict in a sustainable way, you have to not only under- stand it through substantive lenses, but also through emotional and behavioural ones – and likewise understand the interconnectedness between those lenses. It identifies relational and deep-seated themes common to other conflicts (like Israel-Palestine): de- monization, a siege mentality, the historical context of rifts in the relationship. Northern Ireland offered images of hope when former arch-enemies entered government together in 2007; yet this thesis shows that, in spite of political and social transformation, there is still too much societal psychological trauma, and too many unspoken, legacy- and identity-based blockers in the relationship to speak of a conflict resolution.
  • The Outbreak and Development of 'The Troubles'

    The Outbreak and Development of 'The Troubles'

    Heritage, History & Memory Project (Workshop 3) The Outbreak and Development of ‘the Troubles’ A presentation by Professor John Barry followed by a general discussion compiled by Michael Hall ISLAND 115 PAMPHLETS 1 Published March 2019 by Island Publications 132 Serpentine Road, Newtownabbey BT36 7JQ © Michael Hall 2019 [email protected] http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/islandpublications The Fellowship of Messines Association gratefully acknowledge the support they have received from the Heritage Lottery Fund for their Heritage, History & Memory Project and the associated publications Printed by Regency Press, Belfast 2 Introduction The Fellowship of Messines Association was formed in May 2002 by a diverse group of individuals from Loyalist, Republican and other backgrounds, united in their realisation of the need to confront sectarianism in our society as a necessary means of realistic peace-building. The project also engages young people and new citizens on themes of citizenship and cultural and political identity. In 2018 the Association initiated its Heritage, History & Memory Project. For the inaugural launch of this project it was decided to focus on the period of the 1960s, the Civil Rights Movement, and the early stages of the ‘Troubles’. To accomplish this, it was agreed to host a series of six workshops, looking at different aspects of that period, with each workshop developing on from the previous one. The format for each workshop would comprise a presentation by a respected commentator/historian, which would then be followed by a general discussion involving people from diverse political backgrounds, who would be encouraged to share not only their thoughts on the presentation, but their own experiences and memories of the period under discussion.
  • The British Army in Northern Ireland, 1970-1976 Edward Burke the University of St

    The British Army in Northern Ireland, 1970-1976 Edward Burke the University of St

    Counter-Insurgency Against ‘Kith and Kin’? The British Army in Northern Ireland, 1970-1976 Edward Burke The University of St. Andrews 15 The Old Distillery Park Way Comber Newtownards Northern Ireland BT23 5FY Email: [email protected] Phone: 07799904327 Edward Burke Bio Edward Burke completed his PhD thesis at the University of St. Andrews in 2015. His doctoral research was on the experiences and cohesion of small British Army infantry units in the early years of Operation Banner in Northern Ireland. Prior to embarking on his doctoral research, Edward was Deputy Head of the International Police Coordination Board in Kabul, Afghanistan from 2010 to 2012. He is also currently an Associate Fellow at FRIDE, a European foreign policy think in Brussels. Edward has lectured at the Royal United Services Institute, Chatham House in London and the Naval Postgraduate School in the United States. His publications include ‘Flying into the Unknown: Ireland’s contribution to the United Nations Mission in the Congo (ONUC)’ in Michael Kennedy and Deirdre McMahon (eds.), Obligations and Responsibilities: Ireland and the United Nations, 1955-2005 (Dublin: Institute of Public Administration and the Department of Foreign Affairs); ‘Europe’s role in the stabilisation of Iraq’, in Richard Youngs (ed.), Idealism at Bay: Trends in European Democracy Promotion, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2010) and ‘Leaving the Civilians Behind: The “Soldier-Diplomat” in Afghanistan and Iraq, PRISM – National Defense University 1/2 (2010). Edward was awarded a BA 1 in Modern History from Trinity College Dublin and an MA in War Studies from King’s College London.
  • Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups

    Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups

    European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues.
  • HOUSES of the OIREACHTAS Volume 2 No

    HOUSES of the OIREACHTAS Volume 2 No

    HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS Volume 2 No. 3 Morning No. 4 Afternoon AN COMHCHOISTE FIOSRÚCHÁIN I DTAOBH NA GÉARCHÉIME BAINCÉI- REACHTA JOINT COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO THE BANKING CRISIS Déardaoin, 23 Aibreán 2015 Thursday, 23 April 2015 The Committee met at 9.30 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Deputy Pearse Doherty, Senator Sean D. Barrett, Deputy Joe Higgins, Senator Michael D’Arcy, Deputy Michael McGrath, Senator Marc MacSharry, Deputy Eoghan Murphy, Senator Susan O’Keeffe. Deputy Kieran O’Donnell, Deputy John Paul Phelan, DEPUTY CIARÁN LYNCH IN THE CHAIR. 1 NEXUS PHASE Nexus Phase AIB - Mr. Dermot Gleeson Chairman: I now propose that, as we have a quorum, the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis will now go into public session. Is that agreed? Agreed. We commence this morning’s proceedings, session 1, public hearing, and a discussion with Mr. Dermot Gleeson, former chairman of Allied Irish Banks. In doing so, I would like to wel- come everyone to the 20th public hearing of the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis and this morning we will hear from Mr. Dermot Gleeson, former chairman of Allied Irish Banks. Mr. Gleeson was a leading barrister and senior counsel in Ireland in the 1980s and 1990s before he became a senior Government adviser and then a businessman. He served as At- torney General of Ireland in the Government of Taoiseach John Bruton. In 2003, Mr. Gleeson was appointed chairman of Allied Irish Banks. Mr. Gleeson, you are very welcome before the inquiry this morning. Mr. Dermot Gleeson: Thank you, Chairman.