Original Article
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2007; 35: 124–130 doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01405.x Original Article Fungal keratitis in Melbourne Prashant Bhartiya FRCS,1,2 Mark Daniell FRANZCO,1,2 Marios Constantinou BScHons BOrth,1,2 FM Amirul Islam PhD1,2 and Hugh R Taylor AC FRANZCO1,2 1Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, and 2Corneal Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Background: Description of the clinical and microbiolog- Fungal keratitis is a potentially blinding ocular disease. The ical spectrum of fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care hos- incidence of fungal keratitis varies widely throughout the pital in Melbourne, Australia. world. A report from India showed that nearly 50% of all corneal ulcers were caused by fungi.1 This high prevalence Methods: Retrospective review of all patients with keratitis of fungal pathogens in south India is significantly greater with positive fungal cultures from corneal or associated than that found in similar studies in Nepal (17%),2 samples presenting to the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hos- Bangladesh (36%)3 and south Florida (35%).4 Several large pital, Melbourne, Australia from July 1996 to May 2004. studies on fungal keratitis have been published from North 4–12 Demographic data, predisposing factors, features on pre- and South America, Africa and the Indian subcontinent. However, there is a paucity of data on the spectrum of fungal sentation, management, outcomes and microbiological data keratitis in patients from Australia. This study reviewed a were collected and analysed. series of patients with keratitis who had fungal growth on Results: The study included 56 eyes of 56 patients. Thirty- culture at the Corneal Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear five patients were treated as ‘typical’ fungal keratitis and Hospital, Melbourne (Victoria). We present the clinical characteristics, laboratory investigations, treatments and used for description and analysis, with a mean follow up of outcomes of these patients. 18 months. Ocular trauma (37.1%), chronic steroid use (31.4%) and poor ocular surface (25.7%) were the major predisposing factors. Perforation was seen in 25.7% of METHODS patients, penetrating keratoplasty was required in 9 (25.7%) A retrospective chart review of all patients who had a posi- patients and evisceration was performed in 2 (5.7%) tive fungal culture from corneal scrapings and diagnosis of patients. Candida albicans (13 patients, 37.2%) was the most fungal keratitis presenting from July 1996 to May 2004 to common fungal isolate accounting for more than one-third the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital was performed. of all organisms followed by Aspergillus fumigatus (six The hospital’s ethics committee approved the study. The patients, 17.1%) and Fusarium sp. (five patients, 14.3%). Corneal Clinic follows a standard protocol for the initial microbiological investigation of all patients with keratitis. Conclusions: The present study describes the clinical pat- On presentation, corneal specimens from scrapings were terns of fungal keratitis in Melbourne, Australia and con- submitted for staining with Gram’s and Blankophor and cul- trasts them with reports from other areas of the world. A tures on blood agar, chocolate agar, Sabouraud’s dextrose high incidence of C. albicans infection and the prior use of agar and thioglycolate broth. Patients with negative cultures steroids in high proportion of the patients are highlighted from initial specimens who had a progression of corneal in this study. infection underwent repeat cultures and/or biopsies, some- times with the use of special stains and culture media as Key words: antifungal drug, Candida albicans, fungal kerati- indicated. A swab for Herpes simplex DNA detection by tis, voriconazole. polymerase chain reaction was also taken in all cases. Correspondence: Dr Mark Daniell, Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Corneal Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Locked Bag 8, East Melbourne, Vic. 8002, Australia. Email: [email protected] Received 29 March 2006; accepted 5 September 2006. © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists Fungal keratitis in Melbourne 125 All of the corneal specimens were submitted to the Micro- typical’ in spite of a positive fungal culture. The ‘not typical’ biology Department, St Vincent’s Hospital (Melbourne). group was not considered as having fungal keratitis clinically. The Sabouraud’s agar was kept at ambient temperature and These were treated with empirical fortified intensive antibi- the other media were incubated at 37°C. The fungal cultures otics and showed satisfactory clinical improvement and were followed for 4 weeks before a negative result was resolution without antifungal treatment. Seven of the 56 declared and the slopes were discarded. patients were excluded from this analysis because of inade- Treatment followed a standard protocol with natamycin quate records. Over this period we saw approximately 92 as the standard topical treatment for filamentous fungal patients per year treated for bacterial keratitis giving an keratitis. Topical amphotericin 0.15% was used as initial overall proportion of about 5% treated for fungal keratitis. treatment for the treatment of yeast infections. Systemic Those treated for ‘typical’ fungal keratitis included 35 eyes antifungal drugs were used in large ulcers threatening scleral of 35 patients. The age of the patients ranged from 8 to invasion or when extension into the anterior chamber was 87 years (mean 55 years) (Table 1). Of these 20 were men suspected. (57%). The age of the patients in the ‘not typical’ group Medical records of the patients who had a positive fungal ranged from 17 to 79 years (mean 38 years). Occupation of culture were reviewed for the following features: age, sex, the patients in the ‘typical’ group was recorded in only eight medications used topically and systemically before or after of 35 patients. Of the eight patients, four had occupations the onset of fungal keratitis, predisposing risk factors and associated with fungal keratitis: a farmer infected with Fusar- associated conditions, clinical features, medical and surgical ium sp.; a second farmer infected with Scedosporium prolificans; managements, duration of hospitalization, results of micro- a fruit picker infected with Gloesporium fructigenum (found on biology examinations and follow up of patients for outcomes leaves); a gardener infected with Arthrographis kalrae. The until the most recent evaluation at the Corneal clinic. other four with known occupations were two students and Patients who had a positive fungal culture and were two retired people. treated for fungal keratitis were regarded as ‘typical’ and At the time of presentation the average duration of symp- grouped in the ‘typical’ group. If the patient was not treated toms was 13 days in the ‘typical’ group and 4 days in the ‘not for fungal keratitis in spite of a positive fungal culture these typical’ group. Most patients in the ‘typical’ group had were regarded as ‘not typical’. These patients were grouped already received some ocular treatment that had been started separately in the ‘not typical’ group. by the referring doctor; however, only three patients in the All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical ‘not typical’ group received prior medications (Table 2). In Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (Ver- the ‘typical’ group topical antibiotics were being used by sion 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The t-tests were 69% and topical steroid therapy by 60%. One patient in the used to test for significant differences between the propor- ‘typical’ group had received topical anaesthetic drops from a tion of filamentous and yeast groups, with a P-value <0.05 general practitioner for contact lens-related discomfort. All considered significant. patients in both groups had ocular risk factors with 10 patients in the ‘typical’ group having more than one risk factor (Table 3). RESULTS Filamentous fungal infection in the ‘typical’ group A total of 56 patients with keratitis were identified in whom was strongly associated with vegetative matter/trauma fungus had been found on microbiological examination of (P < 0.001) whereas yeast infection was associated with aller- corneal scrapings. Thirty-five of these patients were treated gic eye disease (P < 0.001). In the ‘not typical’ group, five for fungal keratitis and were regarded as being ‘typical’ and (36%) patients had a contact lens-associated infection and were used for main description and analysis. Fourteen of the another six (43%) had a history of ocular injury (Table 3). In total of 56 patients (37.5%) were regarded as being ‘not the ‘typical’ group, associated systemic risk factors were seen Table 1. Age distribution Age group Typical Not typical (years) Total Filamentous Yeast P-value Total Filamentous Yeast P-value n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) <20 1 (3) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0.91 (NS) 3 (21) 1 (13) 2 (33) 0.44 (NS) 21–40 7 (20) 3 (14) 4 (29) 7 (50) 5 (63) 2 (33) 41–60 16 (46) 13 (62) 3 (21) 1 (7) 1 (13) 0 (0) 61–80 6 (17) 2 (10) 4 (29) 3 (21) 1 (13) 2 (33) >80 5 (14) 2 (10) 3 (21) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Total 35 (100) 21 (100) 14 (100) 14 (100) 8 (100) 6 (100) NS, not significant. © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists 126 Bhartiya et al. Table 2. Patient medications at presentation Medication Typical Not typical Total Filamentous Yeast P-value Total Filamentous Yeast P-value n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Topical steroids 21 (60) 12 (57) 9 (65) 0.63 1 (7) 0 (0) 1 (17) 0.27 Topical antibiotics 24 (69) 14 (67) 10 (71) 0.80 2 (14) 1 (13) 1 (17) 0.84 Topical Zovirax 5 (14) 3 (14) 2 (14) 1.00 Topical antiglaucoma 3 (9) 0 (0) 3 (21) 0.05 Topical anaesthetic drops† 1 (3) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0.29 Oral prednisolone and/or immunosuppressants 3 (9) 1 (5) 2 (14) 0.39 No medications 4 (11) 2 (10) 2 (14) 0.73 11 (79) 7 (88) 4 (67) 0.35 †Alcaine for contact lens-induced irritation by general practitioner.