DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Gender Stocktake of State Sector Boards and Committees 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Gender Stocktake of State Sector Boards and Committees as at 31 December 2016 2016 © Ministry for Women PO Box 10 049 Wellington 6143 New Zealand Tel: (04) 915 7112 Fax: (04) 916 1604 www.women.govt.nz [email protected] Ministry for Women 2016 Gender Stocktake of State Sector Boards and Committees 3 Introduction All women should get the opportunities and encouragement to fully contribute their leadership skills and talents. The case for gender diversity is However, further work is needed, as This includes appointments internationally recognised. Greater there are still state sectors boards in made to state sector boards and diversity, in particular gender some fields where women remain committees considered by the diversity, is correlated with improved poorly represented. Cabinet Appointments and Honours performance of boards. Diverse boards Committee (APH) or other Cabinet While this stocktake shows that the are more likely to be effective, better committees, and appointments made overall representation of women on able to understand their customers by the Governor-General on the state sector boards is strengthening, and stakeholders and to benefit from recommendation of a Minister. women’s representation in leadership fresh perspectives, new ideas, vigorous generally, especially in the private The Ministry for Women does not challenge and broad experience. sector, remains low. For instance, count appointees who have been women hold only 17 percent of elected, appointed as representatives For the first time the directorships on the boards of of professional groups without proportion of women on companies listed on the NZX. Ministerial right of approval, ex-officio New Zealand state sector members, or current Members of Ministry for Women research has boards is above 45 percent, Parliament appointees. It also does shown the biggest barriers to increasing from 43.4 percent not count temporary boards or women’s leadership representation committees which are established for in 2015 to 45.3 percent in are unconscious bias, and the negative a particular project. 2016. This is the greatest impact that breaks and flexible work annual increase since the have on women’s career progression. Appointments made outside of APH Ministry began recording This shows that organisations need to or other Cabinet Committees are this data in 2004. do more to remove these barriers so by definition not included. There that more women can fully contribute may be progress made within these This increase is the result of their leadership skills to organisations appointments which is not reflected work done by Ministers and their and the economy as a whole. in the Stocktake results. For example, appointing agencies to identify and the Justice portfolio appoints to roles outside of APH and Cabinet nominate suitable women candidates Annual stocktake for board roles. The Ministry for Committees, and within the relevant Women has been supporting this The gender stocktake of state sector timeframe these consisted of 128 effort by promoting the appointment boards and committees is undertaken persons, of which 82 (64.1 percent) of more women to boards and annually by the Ministry for Women. were women. making its own board nominations It counts the Ministerial appointments from its extensive database of over to state sector boards and committees 1000 board-ready women. as at 31 December 2016. 4 Summary by Ministerial Portfolio Summary by Ministerial Portfolio Women Ministerial Ministerial Percentage Ministerial Portfolio Boards appointed appointed of women members members Prime Minister 5 8 3 37.5% Minister for ACC 3 22 8 36.4% Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage 14 89 34 38.2% Attorney-General 8 98 36 36.7% Minister for Building and Construction 6 47 13 27.7% Minister of Commerce and Consumer 14 70 28 40.0% Affairs Minister for Communications 4 23 9 39.1% Minister for the Community and Voluntary 2 10 6 60.0% Sector Minister of Conservation 29 231 97 42.0% Minister of Corrections 2 4 1 25.0% Minister of Defence 1 19 6 31.6% Minister for Disability Issues 1 10 7 70.0% Minister Responsible for the Earthquake 1 7 2 28.6% Commission Minister for Economic Development 5 23 9 39.1% Minister of Education 12 74 37 50.0% Minister of Energy and Resources 4 17 7 41.2% Minister for the Environment 6 45 16 35.6% Minister for Ethnic Communities 1 8 4 50.0% Minister of Finance 22 189 89 47.1% Minister for Food Safety 1 3 1 33.3% Minister of Foreign Affairs 10 43 16 37.2% Minister Supporting Greater Christchurch 3 16 7 43.8% Regeneration Minister of Health 55 517 318 61.5% Minister Responsible for HNZC 1 8 2 25.0% Minister of Internal Affairs 31 159 91 57.2% Minister of Justice 53 227 81 35.7% Minister for Land Information 4 20 9 45.0% Minister of Local Government 1 4 1 25.0% Ministry for Women 2016 Gender Stocktake of State Sector Boards and Committees 5 Women Ministerial Ministerial Percentage Ministerial Portfolio Boards appointed appointed of women members members Minister for Māori Development 6 37 17 45.9% Minister of Pacific Peoples 3 19 10 52.6% Minister for Primary Industries 15 74 28 37.8% Minister for Racing 2 8 2 25.0% Minister of Science and Innovation 12 89 34 38.2% Minister for Small Business 1 11 5 45.5% Minister for Social Development 17 63 33 52.4% Minister for Social Housing 1 3 1 33.3% Minister for Sport and Recreation 4 28 9 32.1% Minister for State Owned Enterprises 20 113 40 35.4% Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills and 28 116 48 41.4% Employment Minister of Tourism 3 16 4 25.0% Minister of Transport 7 43 7 16.3% Minister for Treaty of Waitangi 1 2 2 100.0% Negotiations Minister of Veterans' Affairs 4 20 9 45.0% Minister for Whānau Ora 1 4 1 25.0% Minister for Women 1 8 6 75.0% Minister of Workplace Relations and Safety 4 28 16 57.1% Total 429 2673 1210 45.3% 6 Summary by Administering Agency Summary by Administering Agency Women Ministerial Administering Ministerial Percentage Boards appointed agency appointed of women members members Accident Compensation Corporation 1 8 2 25.0% Department of Conservation 29 231 97 42.0% Department of Corrections 2 4 1 25.0% Department of Internal Affairs 49 316 167 52.8% Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet 3 5 2 40.0% Land Information New Zealand 4 20 9 45.0% Ministry for Culture and Heritage 16 105 38 36.2% Ministry for the Environment 6 45 16 35.6% Ministry for Pacific Peoples 3 19 10 52.6% Ministry for Primary Industries 14 68 26 38.2% Ministry for Women 1 8 6 75.0% Ministry of Business, Innovation 45 266 104 39.1% and Employment Ministry of Education 12 78 38 48.7% Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 10 43 16 37.2% Ministry of Health 55 517 318 61.5% Ministry of Justice 60 318 115 36.2% Ministry of Social Development 18 73 40 54.8% Ministry of Transport 7 43 7 16.3% New Zealand Defence Force 5 39 15 38.5% Office of the Prime Minister’s Science 1 1 0 0.0% Advisory Committee Parliamentary Counsel Office 1 1 0 0.0% Te Puni Ko-kiri 8 46 19 41.3% Tertiary Education Commission 26 101 42 41.6% Treasury 52 312 121 38.8% Not Allocated 1 6 1 16.7% Total 429 2673 1210 45.3% Ministry for Women 2016 Gender Stocktake of State Sector Boards and Committees 7 Results listed by Administering Agency Women Ministerial Board or committee Ministerial Percentage Boards appointed by agency appointed of women members members Accident Compensation Corporation 1 8 2 25.0% Motorcycle Safety Advisory Council 1 8 2 25.0% Department of Conservation 29 231 97 42.0% Aotea Conservation Park Advisory 1 10 6 60.0% Committee Auckland Conservation Board 1 12 5 41.7% Bay of Plenty Conservation Board 1 9 4 44.4% Canterbury Aoraki Conservation Board 1 11 5 45.5% Chatham Islands Conservation Board 1 7 6 85.7% East Coast / Hawke’s Bay Conservation 1 7 6 85.7% Board Game Animal Council 1 11 1 9.1% Hauraki Gulf Forum 1 6 4 66.7% Kaikoura Marine Guardians 1 11 3 27.3% Nature Heritage Fund Committee 1 5 2 40.0% Nelson/Marlborough Conservation Board 1 11 7 63.6% New Zealand Conservation Authority 1 13 5 38.5% New Zealand Game Bird Habitat Trust 1 6 1 16.7% Board Nga Whenua Rahui Komiti 1 6 1 16.7% Ngāti Awa Joint Management Committee 1 5 2 40.0% Northland Conservation Board 1 7 4 57.1% Otago Conservation Board 1 8 4 50.0% Predator Free 2050 Ltd 1 9 3 33.3% Queen Elizabeth II National Trust Board 1 4 2 50.0% Southland Conservation Board 1 10 3 30.0% Taranaki/Whanganui Conservation Board 1 9 4 44.4% Te Hiku o Te Ika Conservation Board 1 4 1 25.0% 8 Results listed by Administering Agency Women Ministerial Board or committee Ministerial Percentage Boards appointed by agency appointed of women members members Te Poari Whakahaere o Taupo-Nui-a-Tia 1 2 1 50.0% Taupo-Nui-a-Tia Management Board Te Tatau Pounamu o Te Awa o Te Atua (Ngāti Awa and Ngāti Tu-wharetoa Joint 1 6 1 16.7% Advisory Committee) Te Urewera Board 1 4 1 25.0% Tongariro/Taupo Conservation Board 1 8 3 37.5% Waikato Conservation Board 1 10 4 40.0% Wellington Conservation Board 1 9 4 44.4% West Coast/Tai Poutini Conservation Board 1 11 4 36.4% Department of Corrections 2 4 1 25.0% Community Impact Forum 1 1 0 0.0% Social Impact Fund Allocation Committee 1 3 1 33.3% Department of Internal Affairs 49 316 167 52.8% Archives Council 1 6 4 66.7% Bay of Plenty Community Trust 1 12 3 25.0% Charities Registration Board 1 3 1 33.3% Chinese Poll Tax Heritage Trust 1 8 4 50.0% Community Trust of Mid and South 1 10 6 60.0% Canterbury Community Trust of Southland 1 10 4 40.0% Eastern and Central Community Trust 1 12 5 41.7% Film and Literature Board of Review 1 9 5 55.6% Film and Video Labelling
Recommended publications
  • Report for a Historic Place Hurston, WELLINGTON (List No

    Report for a Historic Place Hurston, WELLINGTON (List No

    New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero – Report for a Historic Place Hurston, WELLINGTON (List No. 9954, Category 2) Hurston, Island Bay, Wellington (Miranda Williamson, Heritage New Zealand, 10 January 2021) Miranda Williamson Last amended 15 February 2021 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. IDENTIFICATION 4 1.1. Name of Place 4 1.2. Location Information 4 1.3. Legal Description 4 1.4. Extent of List Entry 4 1.5. Eligibility 5 1.6. Existing Heritage Recognition 5 2. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 5 2.1. Historical Information 5 2.2. Physical Information 10 2.3. Chattels 13 2.4. Sources 13 3. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT 14 3.1. Section 66 (1) Assessment 14 3.2. Section 66 (3) Assessment 15 4. APPENDICES 17 4.1. Appendix 1: Visual Identification Aids 17 4.2. Appendix 2: Visual Aids to Historical Information 21 4.3. Appendix 3: Visual Aids to Physical Information 25 4.4. Appendix 4: Significance Assessment Information 27 Disclaimer Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions. Archaeological sites are protected by the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, regardless of whether they are entered on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero or not. Archaeological sites include ‘places associated with pre-1900 human activity, where there may be evidence relating to the history of New Zealand’.
  • Annual Report 2019/20

    Annual Report 2019/20

    Annual Report 2019 – 2020 TE TUMU WHAKAATA TAONGA | NEW ZEALAND FILM COMMISSION Annual Report – 2019/20 1 G19 REPORT OF THE NEW ZEALAND FILM COMMISSION for the year ended 30 June 2020 In accordance with Sections 150 to 157 of the Crown Entities Act 2004, on behalf of the New Zealand Film Commission we present the Annual Report covering the activities of the NZFC for the 12 months ended 30 June 2020. Kerry Prendergast David Wright CHAIR BOARD MEMBER Image: Daniel Cover Image: Bellbird TE TUMU WHAKAATA TAONGA | NEW ZEALAND FILM COMMISSION Annual Report – 2019/20 1 NEW ZEALAND FILM COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2019/20 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION COVID-19 Our Year in Review ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 The screen industry faced unprecedented disruption in 2020 as a result of COVID-19. At the time the country moved to Alert Level 4, 47 New Zealand screen productions were in various stages Chair’s Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 of production: some were near completion and already scheduled for theatrical release, some in post-production, many in production itself and several with offers of finance gearing up for CEO Report •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7 pre-production. Work on these projects was largely suspended during the lockdown. There were also thousands of New Zealand crew working on international productions who found themselves NZFC Objectives/Medium Term Goals •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 without work while waiting for production to recommence. NZFC's Performance Framework ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 COVID-19 also significantly impacted the domestic box office with cinema closures during Levels Vision, Values and Goals ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 3 and 4 disrupting the release schedule and curtailing the length of time several local features Activate high impact, authentic and culturally significant Screen Stories ••••••••••••• 11 played in cinemas.
  • Statement of Intent Contents

    Statement of Intent Contents

    ANTARCTICA NEW ZEALAND 2019 – 2023 2019 Statement of Intent Contents Introduction 3 Nature and scope 4 Operating environment 5 Our objectives 7 Overview 8 Our goal for New Zealanders 9 What we will achieve 10 Organisational health and capability 17 Asset management 18 Cover: Photo Fiona Shanhun © Antarctica New Zealand (2019) © Antarctica New Zealand (2019) 2 Introduction Introduction Antarctica New Zealand’s vision statement Antarctica and the Southern Ocean – valued, protected, understood – highlights Antarctica’s importance to New Zealand Valuing the intrinsic and scientific values of Antarctica and • Develop a strategic, transparent and objective the security provided through the Antarctic Treaty System as process for the allocation of logistics to support an effective governance regime to ensure Antarctica’s future science where demand exceeds supply as a natural reserve devoted to peace and science. • Host the Antarctic Science Platform and support it Protecting Antarctica to the highest standards of to be successful international environmental stewardship through our efforts • Ensure the Antarctic Science Platform research to minimise environmental footprints, leadership in protected is well coordinated with New Zealand’s broader area management and support for the conservation of Antarctic and Southern Ocean research effort human heritage in the Ross Sea region. • Understanding the impacts and influence of climate Support the Antarctic Office to deliver the Antarctic change and human interactions in Antarctica and on New Gateway strategy that celebrates and realises Zealand's climate and ocean systems is of vital importance. the value of Christchurch’s gateway status for the Examples include predicting the impact of change in benefit of the city and the nation Southern Ocean fish stocks, coastal impacts through • Demonstrate leadership in influential Antarctic sea level rise and natural environmental impacts due to Treaty forums and facilitate cooperation and changing weather patterns.
  • 8 July 2021 Anderson & Co Resource Management PO Box 5933 Dunedin 9058 by Email: Conrad A@Xtra.Co.Nz Dear Conrad AFFECTED PA

    8 July 2021 Anderson & Co Resource Management PO Box 5933 Dunedin 9058 by Email: Conrad [email protected] Dear Conrad AFFECTED PA

    8 July 2021 Anderson & Co Resource Management PO Box 5933 Dunedin 9058 By email: [email protected] Dear Conrad AFFECTED PARTY APPROVAL UNDER THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991: MANIOTOTO HOSPTIAL (FORMER), 51 TYRONE STREET, RANFURLY 1. Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga is an autonomous Crown Entity with statutory responsibility under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) for the identification, protection, preservation, and conservation of New Zealand’s historical and cultural heritage. 2. Heritage New Zealand received an application for resource consent dated 4 August 2020, applied for by Conrad Anderson of Anderson & Co Resource Management on behalf of Maniototo Health Services Ltd, for the proposed demolition of the former Maniototo Hospital at 51 Tyrone Street, Ranfurly. The application did not include an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE) and processing was put on hold until additional information was supplied. 3. An updated application including an AEE was provided on 22 September 2020. The AEE lacked detail required under the Central Otago District Plan to assess the potential adverse effects of the proposed demolition and Heritage New Zealand advised it was unable to provide written approval at this time. An updated application was provided on 26 November 2020 which included further detail regarding the heritage significance, structural integrity and potential for adaptive reuse of the hospital. Heritage New Zealand considered that the adverse effects on heritage values would be more than minor and advised the applicant that written approval unable to be provided. On 1 July 2021, the applicant offered conditions to mitigate the adverse effects of the proposed demolition which formed part of their application.
  • Reports of Select Committees on the 2014/15

    Reports of Select Committees on the 2014/15

    I. 20B Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 annual reviews of Crown entities, Government departments and Offices of Parliament, public organisations, and State enterprises Fifty-first Parliament March 2016 I. 20B I. 20B Contents Crown entity/public Select Committee Date presented Page organisation/State enterprise Government of New Zealand for the Finance and Expenditure 04 Mar 2016 11 year ended 30 June 2015, Financial Statements of the Economic Development and Infrastructure Sector Accident Compensation Corporation Transport and Industrial 16 Mar 2016 37 Relations Air New Zealand Limited Finance and Expenditure 10 Mar 2016 65 Airways Corporation of New Zealand Transport and Industrial 09 Mar 2016 93 Limited Relations Broadcasting Commission Commerce 18 Mar 2016 95 Broadcasting Standards Authority Commerce 23 Feb 2016 99 Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Government Administration 18 Mar 2016 101 Authority Civil Aviation Authority of New Transport and Industrial 09 Mar 2016 93 Zealand Relations Commerce Commission Commerce 11 Mar 2016 107 Crown Fibre Holdings Limited Commerce 15 Feb 2016 111 Earthquake Commission (reported with the Finance and Expenditure 10 Mar 2016 117 Report from the Controller and Auditor- General, Earthquake Commission: Managing the Canterbury Home Repair Programme – follow-up audit) Electricity Authority Commerce 15 Feb 2016 141 Electricity Corporation of New Zealand Commerce 23 Feb 2016 99 Limited External Reporting Board Commerce 23 Feb 2016 99 FairWay Resolution Limited Transport and Industrial 16 Mar 2016
  • Koiwi Tangata Human Remains

    Koiwi Tangata Human Remains

    Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Archaeological Guidelines Series Koiwi Tangata Human Remains 08 25 August 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Executive summary 4 3. Definitions 5 4. Legislative framework 6 Coroners Act 2006 6 Burial and Cremation Act 1964 6 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) 6 Protected Objects Act 1975 7 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 8 4.1 Can more than one Act apply? 8 4.2 Key agencies – roles and responsibilities 8 Heritage New Zealand 8 New Zealand Police 9 Ministry of Health 9 Tangata Whenua 9 Other agencies 10 5. Significance of koiwi tangata/human remains in the New Zealand context 10 6. Burial practices and their importance 11 7. Guidelines 12 7.1 Accidental discovery – how to proceed 12 7.2 Guidelines for the general public 12 7.3 Guidelines for the Police 13 7.4 Guidelines for developers 14 7.5 Guidelines for consultant archaeologists 15 7.6 Guidelines for Department of Conservation staff 16 7.7 Guidelines for Heritage New Zealand staff (archaeologists and pouarahi) 17 7.8 Guidelines for tangata whenua (iwi, hapu and whanau) 18 8. Minimum standards for recording and recovery 19 9. Deliberate excavation of known burials (cemeteries, urupa etc) 22 10. Repository 23 11. Re-interment 23 11.1 Re-interment of Koiwi tangata/human remains of Maori origin 23 11.2 Re-interment of koiwi tangata/human remains of non-Maori origin 23 12. Cultural considerations 24 Glossary 27 Appendix 1 – Contacts 29 Bibliography 33 Appendix 2 – disinterment application guidelines 34 Appendix 3 – An example of a field recording sheet for human remains 38 Appendix 4 – International precedents 41 United States 41 Australia 43 United Kingdom and Ireland 43 Copyright © Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 2014 Reproduction, adaptation, or issuing of this publication for educational or other non-commercial, personal purposes is authorised without the prior permission of the copyright holder(s).
  • Annual Report Statement of Purpose and Values

    Annual Report Statement of Purpose and Values

    2017-2018 ANTARCTICA NEW ZEALAND ANNUAL REPORT STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND VALUES VISION | Antarctica and the Southern Ocean: Valued, Protected, Understood. PURPOSE | Inspiring people to connect with Antarctica, through knowledge and collaboration. VALUES | People are the key to Antarctica New Zealand’s success. This includes permanent staff, fixed-term and contract staff, seconded staff from the New Zealand Defence Force and our many strategic partners in Government, the science community and other national Antarctic programmes. We seek to create a high-performance organisation underpinned by a culture of shared beliefs: We are passionate about what we do We care for each other and the environment We work together We aspire to the highest standards We act with integrity Antarctica New Zealand is the crown entity responsible for developing, managing and executing New Zealand government activities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. We also manage Scott Base, New Zealand’s Antarctic research station which supports science in the Ross Sea region. VALUED. PROTECTED. UNDERSTOOD. VALUED. PROTECTED. UNDERSTOOD. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT The Board of Antarctica New Zealand is pleased to present, in compliance with Section 151 of the Crown Entities Act 2004, the annual report for the Antarctica New Zealand Group for the year ended 30 June 2018. Sir Brian Roche Dame Therese Walsh Board Chair Finance & Audit Committee Chair 25 October 2018 25 October 2018 © Copyright Antarctica New Zealand 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Crown and abide by the other licence terms.
  • Heritage-New-Zealand-Northland-Adp-2016.Pdf

    Heritage-New-Zealand-Northland-Adp-2016.Pdf

    Accidental Discovery Protocol (ADP) From Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Prior to the commencement of any works, a copy of this ADP should be made available to all contractors working on site. Under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 an archaeological site is defined as a place associated with pre-1900 human activity, where there may be evidence relating to the history of New Zealand. Over 12,000 archaeological sites have been recorded in Northland, and more are identified on a regular basis. For Maori sites (the most common site types in Northland), the largest and most obvious site types are pa, pits and terraces. However, evidence may be of a smaller nature, in the form of bones, shells, charcoal, burnt stone etc; a midden is an archaeological rubbish tip, in which many of these items can be found consolidated together. Evidence of disturbance of a midden can be a scattering of shell across a wide area; this can be confusing if it is near a beach. Pieces of obsidian or chert, together with stone tools, may also be recovered. In later sites of European origin artefacts such as bottle glass, iron/metal, crockery etc. may be found, or evidence of old foundations, wells, drains or similar structures. Burials/koiwi tangata may be found from any period. Some examples: Shell midden Historic bottle Animal bone Archaeological stratigraphy A flight of pits in forest Shell midden uncovered in road scraping In the event of an “accidental discovery” of archaeological material the following steps must be taken: 1. All work on the site will cease immediately.
  • Antarctic.V14.4.1996.Pdf

    Antarctic.V14.4.1996.Pdf

    Antarctic Contents Foreword by Sir Vivian Fuchs Forthcoming Events Cover Story Scott Base 40 Years Ago by Margaret Bradshaw... Cover: Main: How Scott Base looks International today. Three Attempt a World Record Photo — Courtesy of Antarctica New Zealand Library. Solo-Antarctic Crossing National Programmes New Zealand United States of America France Australia Insert: Scott Base during its South Africa final building stage 1957. Photo — Courtesy of Guy on Warren. Education December 1996, Tourism Volume 1 4, No. 4, Echoes of the Past Issue No.l 59 Memory Moments Relived. ANTARCTIC is published quar terly by the New Zealand Antarctic Society Inc., ISSN Historical 01)03-5327, Riddles of the Antarctic Peninsula by D Yelverton. Editor: Shelley Grell Please address all editorial Tributes inquiries and contributions to the Editor, P O Box -104, Sir Robin Irvine Christchurch or Ian Harkess telephone 03 365 0344, facsimile 03 365 4255, e-mail Book Reviews [email protected]. DECEMBER 1996 Antargic Foreword By Sir Vivian Fuchs All the world's Antarcticians will wish to congratulate New Zealand on maintaining Scott Base for the last forty years, and for the valuable scientific work which has been accom plished. First established to receive the Crossing Party of the Commonwealth Trans- Antarctic Expedition 1955-58, it also housed the New Zealand P a r t y w o r k i n g f o r t h e International Geophysical Year. Today the original huts have been replaced by a more modern„. , j . , Sir andEdmund Hillaryextensive and Dr. V E.base; Fuchs join •'forces at.
  • Public Offices Subject to the Public Records Act 2005 Published January 2020 Arranged by Organisational Category

    Public Offices Subject to the Public Records Act 2005 Published January 2020 Arranged by Organisational Category

    December 2019 Public Offices subject to the Public Records Act 2005 Published January 2020 Arranged by organisational category. Legal name of agency Entity type Commercial Fisheries Services (FishServe) [Approved service Approved service delivery delivery organisation 2013-2023] organisation Netsafe Incorporated [Approved Agency role] Approved Agency Accreditation Council Autonomous Crown entity Arts Council of New Zealand (Creative NZ) Autonomous Crown entity Broadcasting Commission (NZ On Air) Autonomous Crown entity Government Superannuation Fund Authority Autonomous Crown entity Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation Autonomous Crown entity Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Autonomous Crown entity Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Board Autonomous Crown entity New Zealand Artificial Limb Service Autonomous Crown entity New Zealand Film Commission Autonomous Crown entity New Zealand Infrastructure Commission / Te Waihanga Autonomous Crown entity New Zealand Lotteries Commission Autonomous Crown entity New Zealand Symphony Orchestra Autonomous Crown entity Public Trust Autonomous Crown entity Retirement Commissioner (Commission for Financial Capability) Autonomous Crown entity Te Reo Whakapuaki Irirangi (Māori Broadcasting Funding Autonomous Crown entity Agency) Te Taura Whiri i Te Reo Māori (Māori Language Commission) Autonomous Crown entity Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) Crown agent Callaghan Innovation Crown agent Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand Crown agent Part of the Department of Internal Affairs Printed
  • Unfolding Tensions Within Post-Settlement Governance and Tribal Economies in Aotearoa New Zealand

    Unfolding Tensions Within Post-Settlement Governance and Tribal Economies in Aotearoa New Zealand

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331695965 Unfolding tensions within post-settlement governance and tribal economies in Aotearoa New Zealand Article in Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy · March 2019 DOI: 10.1108/JEC-12-2018-0104 CITATIONS READS 4 168 4 authors, including: Jason Paul Mika Annemarie Gillies Massey University Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 39 PUBLICATIONS 76 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Research Handbook of Responsible Management View project Persisting inequalities in new governance models View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jason Paul Mika on 29 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy Unfolding tensions within post-settlement governance and tribal economies in Aotearoa New Zealand Jason Paul Mika, Graham Hingangaroa Smith, Annemarie Gillies, Fiona Wiremu, Article information: To cite this document: Jason Paul Mika, Graham Hingangaroa Smith, Annemarie Gillies, Fiona Wiremu, (2019) "Unfolding tensions within post-settlement governance and tribal economies in Aotearoa New Zealand", Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, https://doi.org/10.1108/ JEC-12-2018-0104 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-12-2018-0104
  • Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Statement of Performance Expectations 2019-2020

    Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Statement of Performance Expectations 2019-2020

    C.18 HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS 2019-2020 Presented to the Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage pursuant to Section 149L of the Crown Entities Act 2004 Tukutuku panel detail, Kikopiri Marae. IMAGE: ARNO GASTEIGER contents: HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS 2019-2020 1: STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS 2 2: HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 3 3: HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA KEY PRIORITY OUTPUTS 2019-2020 7 4: PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-2020 13 4.1 Financial planning assumptions 13 4.2 Prospective Statement of Comprehensive Revenue and Expense 14 4.3 Prospective Statement of Financial Position 15 4.4 Prospective Statement of Movements in Equity 16 4.5 Prospective Statement of Cash Flows 17 4.6 Prospective Statement of Accounting Policies 18 heritage new zealand pouhere taonga heritage property portfolio 21 COVER: LEARNING ABOUT THE TREATY OF WAITANGI AT MĀNGUNGU MISSION. IMAGE: GRANT SHEEHAN/HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS 2019-2020 n HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA 1 part one: 1. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STATEMENT OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS In accordance with the Crown Entities Act 2004 and FRS – 42, Prospective Financial Statements, the Board and the management of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga hereby state that: n The Board and the management of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga have been responsible for the preparation of these Statement of Performance Expectations and Prospective Financial Statements, including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying them, and the judgements used therein.