572603 Itunes Pfitzner
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases by Michael H
Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: The Popular Bases By Michael H. Kater The thesis that manifestations of "Antisemitism" in the Third Reich were largely a result of manipulations by Nazi politicians rather than the reflection of true sentiments among the German people appears firmly established nowadays. This thesis treats the course of German history as being devoid of a specific antisemitic tradition and regards what authentic symptoms of Antisemitism there were, before and during Hitler's rise to power, as merely incidental.1 One might well agree with Hajo Holborn's suggestion that Hitler, the supreme propagandist of his Nazi Party (NSDAP) and of the Third Reich, conjured up Antisemitism by arousing hatred within the Germans, in order to further the regime's ultimate goals. But then one cannot, like Eva Reichmann, altogether discount pre-existing notions of Judeo-phobia among the German people and, by implication, absolve them of their complicity in the Holocaust.2 Since the appearance of Reichmann's and Holborn's writings, 1 The first view has been succinctly stated by Thomas Nipperdey, “1933 und Kontinuitaet der deutschen Geschichte,” Historische Zeitschrift 227, 1978: 98. An example of the second view is in William Sheridan Allen, The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town 1930–1935 , Chicago, 1965, p. 77, who writes that the inhabitants of the small North German town of Northeim (“Thalburg”) were drawn to anti-Semitism because they were drawn to Nazism, not the other way around ' . 2 Hajo Holborn, “Origins and Political Character of Nazi Ideology,” Political Science Quarterly 79, 1964: 546; Eva G. -
Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases
Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-war Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases The thesis that manifestations of "antisemitism" in the Third Reich were largely a result of manipulations by Nazi politicians rather than the reflection of true sentiments among the German people appears firmly established nowadays. This thesis treats the course of German history as being devoid of a specific antisemitic tradition and regards what authentic symptoms of antisemitism there were, before and during Hitler's rise to power, as merely incidental 1 . One might well agree with Hajo Holborn's suggestion that Hitler, the supreme propagandist of his Nazi Party (NSDAP) and of the Third Reich, conjured up antisemitism by arousing hatred within the Germans, in order to further the regime's ultimate goals. But then one cannot, like Eva Reichmann, altogether discount pre-existing notions of Judeophobia among the German people and, by implication, absolve them of their complicity in the Holocaust 2 . Since the appearance of Reichmann's and Holborn's writings, certain younger scholars, while indubitably presenting cogent arguments, have overemphasized the degree of high-level Nazi management of anti-Jewish action. Conversely, they have downplayed the spontaneity of such action and its general popularity with the German public. In so doing, however, they have come close to mis-comprehending the social basis of antisemitism in the Third Reich and to ignoring its important historical antecedents 3 . 1 The first view has been succinctly stated by Thomas Nipperdey, “1933 und Kontinuitaet der deutschen Geschichte,” Historische Zeitschrift 227, 1978: 98. An example of the second view is in William Sheridan Allen, The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town 1930–1935 , Chicago, 1965, p. -
Tchaikovsky Research Bulletin No. 1
"Klin, near Moscow, was the home of one of the busiest of men…" Previously unknown or unidentified letters by Tchaikovsky to correspondents from Russia, Europe and the USA Presented by Luis Sundkvist and Brett Langston Contents Introduction .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2 I. Russia (Milii Balakirev, Adolph Brodsky, Mariia Klimentova-Muromtseva, Ekaterina Laroche, Iurii Messer, Vasilii Sapel'nikov) .. .. .. 5 II. Austria (Anton Door, Albert Gutmann) .. .. .. .. .. 15 III. Belgium (Désirée Artôt-Padilla, Joseph Dupont, Jean-Théodore Radoux, Józef Wieniawski) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 19 IV. Czech Republic (Adolf Čech, unidentified) .. .. .. .. .. 25 V. France (Édouard Colonne, Eugénie Vergin Colonne, Louis Diémer, Louis Gallet, Lucien Guitry, Jules Massenet, Pauline Viardot-García, three unidentified) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 29 VI. Germany (Robert Bignell, Hugo Bock, Hans von Bülow, Paul Cossmann, Mathilde Cossmann, Aline Friede, Julius Laube, Sophie Menter, Selma Rahter, Friedrich Sieger, two unidentified) .. .. .. .. 55 VII. Great Britain (George Bainton, George Henschel, Francis Arthur Jones, Ethel Smyth, unidentified) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 69 VIII. Poland (Édouard Bergson, unidentified) .. .. .. .. .. 85 IX. United States (E. Elias, W.S.B. Mathews, Marie Reno) .. .. .. 89 New locations for previously published letters .. .. .. .. .. 95 Chronological list of the 55 letters by Tchaikovsky presented in this article .. 96 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. 101 Introduction Apart from their authorship, the only thing that most of the -
Der Landschaftsmaler Edmund Steppes (1873-1968)
1 DER LANDSCHAFTSMALER EDMUND STEPPES (1873-1968) UND SEINE VISION EINER „DEUTSCHEN MALEREI“ VON DER HOCHSCHULE FÜR BILDENDE KÜNSTE BRAUNSCHWEIG ZUR ERLANGUNG DES GRADES EINES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE - DR. PHIL. - genehmigte Dissertation von Andreas Zoller geboren am 26. Juli 1957 in Stuttgart Braunschweig 1999 2 Erst-Referent: Professor Dr. Johannes Zahlten Korreferenten: Professor Dr. Heinrich Dilly Professor Dr. Heino R. Möller Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 24.08.1999 3 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Seite 1 EINLEITUNG 1.1 Annäherung...............................................6 1.2 Forschungslage.......................................... 8 1.3 Quellenlage.............................................15 1.4 Vorgehensweise..........................................17 2 ZUM LEBEN VON EDMUND STEPPES 2.1 Kindheit und Jugend (1873-1891) 2.1.1 Lebensstationen..................................21 2.1.2 Jugendjahre in Selbstzeugnissen..................23 2.1.3 Familie Steppes..................................27 2.1.4 Familie von Schleich.............................30 2.1.5 Christine von Stransky und die Spätromantik.....................................32 2.1.6 Resümee..........................................35 2.2 Lehr- und Wanderjahre (1891-1901) 2.2.1 Lebensstationen..................................36 2.2.2 Bezugspersonen...................................39 2.2.3 Der Lugo-Kreis und Edmund Steppes................41 2.2.4 Erste künstlerische Erfolge......................49 2.2.5 Im Rückblick.....................................53 2.2.6 Zeitzeugnisse....................................55 -
Thinking Europe in Yiddish Edited by Marion Aptroot
Thinking Europe in Yiddish edited by Marion Aptroot Issue n. 17, September 2020 QUEST. Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Journal of the Fondazione CDEC QUEST N. 17 Editors Guri Schwarz (Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy – Editor in Chief), Elissa Bemporad (Queens College of the City University of New York, USA), Laura Brazzo (Fondazione CDEC, Italy), Tullia Catalan (Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italy), Cristiana Facchini (Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italy), Gadi Luzzatto Voghera (Fondazione CDEC, Italy), Dario Miccoli (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italy), Michele Sarfatti (Fondazione CDEC, Italy), Marcella Simoni (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italy), Ulrich Wyrwa (Universität Potsdam and Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung der TU Berlin, Germany). Editorial Assistants Matteo Perissinotto (Univerza v Ljubljani, Slovenia – Managing Editor), Chiara Renzo (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Italy), Piera Rossetto (Universität Graz, Austria). Book Review Editor Miriam Benfatto (Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italy) English Language Editor Elen Rochlin Editorial Advisory Board Ruth Ben Ghiat (New York University, USA), Paolo Luca Bernardini (Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Italy), Dominique Bourel (Université Paris-Sorbonne, France), Michael Brenner (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and American University Washington D.C., Germany and USA), Enzo Campelli (La Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy), Francesco Cassata (Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy), Marco Cuzzi (Università degli Studi -
Forschungsverbund Provenienzforschung Bayern
Forschungsverbund Provenienzforschung Bayern Tätigkeitsbericht 2018 Forschungsverbund Provenienzforschung Bayern Tätigkeitsbericht 2018 F ORS C HUNGSVERBUN D PROVENIENZFORSCHUNG F P B B AYERN Forschungsverbund Provenienzforschung Bayern Tätigkeitsbericht 2018 Impressum Herausgegeben im Auftrag des Forschungsverbundes Provenienzforschung Bayern von Alfred Grimm Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Prinzregentenstraße 3 D-80538 München Redaktion Alfred Grimm Redaktionsschluss 03.02.2019 Prepress Dionys Asenkerschbaumer FPB-Logo Sybille Greisinger Gestaltung und Realisierung Dietmar Klinger Verlag, Passau ISBN: 978-3-86328-168-7 Printed in Germany Inhalt 5 Inhalt Grußwort . 6 Vorwort . 8 I. Institutionen und Personalia . 10 II. Projekte . 15 III. Restitutionen . 63 IV. Provenienzprüfverfahren (Restitutionsanträge) . 77 V. Proaktive Provenienzrecherche zu unter Raubkunstverdacht stehendem Kulturgut . 93 VI. Meldungen wegen Raubkunstverdacht in der ›Lost Art‹-Datenbank des Deutschen Zentrums Kulturgutverluste (DZK), Magdeburg (www.lostart.de) . 108 VII. Organisationstätigkeit . 143 VIII. Aktive Teilnahme an Veranstaltungen . 148 IX. Berichterstattung/Medienresonanz . 163 X. Veröffentlichungen/Herausgebertätigkeit . 166 Addendum . 174 Corrigenda . 175 Kontakt . 176 Bildnachweis . 181 Nachtrag . 182 6 Grußwort Grußwort des Bayerischen Staatsministers für Wissenschaft und Kunst Bernd Sibler Das 20-jährige Jubiläum der »Washing- den Tätigkeit öffentlicher Institutionen im toner Konferenz« 2018 hat die öffentliche Bereich der Provenienzforschung. Die sich -
Fritz Gerlich, Publicist and Prophet – How Did He Resist the Nazis? by Prof
Fritz Gerlich, publicist and prophet – how did he resist the Nazis? By Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Rudolf Morsey, Speyer Gerlich against Hitler Fritz Gerlich is still only mentioned in passing by most of the endless literature about the history of German resistance during the Third Reich. Yet this valiant newspaper editor managed to make his paper Der gerade Weg (“the straight Path”) into one of the fiercest opponents of National Socialism He condemned their false doctrines, often personally attacking Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) (“Does Hitler have Mongolian blood?” was one of his headlines July 17, 1932) and revealed the criminal background of many in Hitler’s inner circle. Gerlich predicted what would happen during the Third Reich; since the spring1932 he had been expecting to be murdered by the Nazis. Gerlich was murdered at the Dachau Concentration camp The last edition of Der gerade Weg appeared on 5 March 1933, three days later Heinrich Himmler (1900-1945) (in his role as acting Munich police chief) banned the paper. The day later, on 9 march 1933, in this evening before Hitler took power in Bavaria the newspaper’s offices were cleared by an SA commando, and Gerlich was mistreated and arrested. After 16 months of agonising ‘protective custody’ in Munich, he was brought to the Dachau Concentration camp on 30 June 1934, on the ‘Night of the Long Knives’, and was murdered immediately. I. The research into Gerlich was not continuously sustained The research into Gerlich, if you can call it that, started early but was not continuously sustained. Already in 1946 a selection of articles by Gerlich and his fellow militant, the capuchin friar Ingbert Naab (1885-1935), were published as “Prophesies against the 3rd Reich”, Munich.