DOCSLIB.ORG

The Development of the Prediction of Protein Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Development of the Prediction of Protein Structure 6 The Development of the Prediction of Protein Structure Gerald D. Fasman I. Introduction .................................................................... 194 II. Protein Topology. .. 196 III. Techniques of Protein Prediction ................................................... 198 A. Sequence Alignment .......................................................... 199 B. Hydrophobicity .............................................................. 200 C. Minimum Energy Calculations ................................................. 202 IV. Approaches to Protein Conformation ................................................ 203 A. Solvent Accessibility ......................................................... 203 B. Packing of Residues .......................................................... 204 C. Distance Geometry ........................................................... 205 D. Amino Acid Physicochemical Properties ......................................... 205 V. Prediction of the Secondary Structure of Proteins: a Helix, ~ Strands, and ~ Turn .......... 208 A. ~ Turns .................................................................... 209 B. Evaluation of Predictive Methodologies .......................................... 218 C. Other Predictive Algorithms ................................................... 222 D. Chou-Fasman Algorithm ...................................................... 224 E. Class Prediction ............................................................. 233 VI. Prediction of Tertiary Structure .................................................... 235 A. Combinatorial Approach ...................................................... 236 B. ~ Sheets ................................................................... 239 C. Packing of a Helices (aia) .................................................... 243 D. Amphipathic a Helices and ~ Strands: Dipole Moments and Electrostatic Interactions .... 245 E. Packing of a Helices and ~ Pleated Sheets (ai~) .................................. 250 F. Prediction of Protein Conformation by Minimum-Energy Calculations ................. 253 G. Expert Systems .............................................................. 256 VII. Prediction of Membrane Structure: Methods of Prediction ............................... 257 VIII. Predicted Membrane Structures .................................................... 264 A. Bacteriorhodopsin ............................................................ 264 B. Acetylcholine Receptor ....................................................... 267 Gerald D. Fasman • Graduate Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254. 193 G. D. Fasman (ed.), Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation © Plenum Press, New York 1989 194 Gerald D. Fasman C. ATPases 269 D. T-Cell Receptor ............................................................. 271 E. Sodium Channel ............................................................. 272 IX. References ..................................................................... 277 X. Appendixes..................................................................... 303 Appendix 1: List of Reviews on Protein Folding and Prediction of Secondary and Tertiary Structure . .. 303 Appendix 2: Programs Available through This Publication for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction . .. 305 Appendix 3: Commercially Available Programs ....................................... 309 Appendix 4: Relevant Programs Described in the Literature ............................. 311 Appendix 5: National Resource Data Bases .......................................... 313 I. INTRODUCTION The tenet of structural biology that function follows fonn had its seeds in the monograph by C. B. Anfinsen, The Molecular Basis of Evolution (Anfinsen, 1959), wherein he stated "Pro­ tein chemists naturally feel that the most likely approach to the understanding of cellular behavior lies in the study of structure and function of protein molecules. " The achievement of protein crystallography over the past 30 years has confinned this view whereby the description of the structure and function of proteins is now frequently understood at the atomic level. The classical experiments of Anfinsen and co-workers (Anfinsen et al., 1961; Anfinsen, 1973) proved that ribonuclease could be denatured and refolded without loss of enzymatic activity. This implied that the amino acid sequence contains sufficient infonnation to define the three-dimensional structure of a protein in a particular environment. The acceptance of this tenet has led to multifarious efforts to predict the confonnation of proteins based only on the consideration of sequence alone, which has been termed the protein-folding problem. Both theoreticians (e.g., Levitt and Warshel, 1975; Nemethy and Scheraga, 1977; Karplus and Weaver, 1979; Schulz and Schinner, 1979; Sternberg, 1983) and experimentalists (e.g., Shoemaker et al., 1987; Creighton, 1978) have tackled the chain-folding problem with very limited success. It is thought that the native structure of a protein will lie near the minimum of free energy; however, it will not fold by sampling every possible conformation (Levinthal, 1968; Wet­ laufer, 1973), but there will be one or more pathways along which the protein folds (Creighton, 1979). Anfinsen (1973) had proposed that one or more regions of secondary structure, e.g., a helices or a two-stranded antiparallel ~ sheet, having marginal stability would act as nucleation sites and direct the refolding. The advent of recombinant DNA techniques has led to an explosion of infonnation concerning the sequences of receptors and enzymes that will be important for drug, herbicide, and pesticide design. Technological developments of industrial, clinical, and agriCUltural importance may be achieved in the coming years by imitation of the interactions between macromolecules and ligands that occur naturally in the living cell (Blundell et ai., 1987). Engineered honnones may have more desirable properties than their native counterparts in tenns of stability or activity. All these promising prospects have fIred the desire to predict the confonnation of and design protein molecules with a high degree of sophistication. The theoretical efforts could be categorized into three main areas: energetic, heuristic, and statistical. The school following the assumption that a protein folds so as to minimize the free energy of the system has had many contributors (e.g., Levitt and Warshel, 1975; Nemethy Development of Protein Structure Prediction 195 and Scheraga, 1977; McCammon et at., 1977; Weiner et at., 1984). These researchers have developed potential functions to describe the energy surface of a polypeptide chain. Chain folding is simulated computationally, directed by surface gradients to find the energy mini­ mum. Alternatively, conformation space is probed from a starting point by integrating the equations of motion over time. These theoretical predictions of structure have been influenced by both thermodynamic and kinetic arguments. The thermodynamic properties of the polypep­ tide chain were the first to be cOlisidered. Liquori and co-workers (DeSantis et al., 1965) and Ramachandran et al. (1963) first demonstrated that the peptide unit can adopt only certain allowed conformations. They constructed <\>, I)J plots, which were subsequently improved by semiempirical energy calculations (Lewis et at., 1973b), to predict preferred regions for the various secondary structures of polypeptides. Recent energy calculations have been refined, either by choosing parameters to fit crystal structures (Hagler et al., 1974) or by performing complex molecular orbital calculations (Pullman and Pullman, 1974). On the basis of the thermodynamic hypothesis, by calculating the total free energy of a protein and finding the global minimum, it should be possible to predict the native structure. However, minimization schemes have failed to predict chain folding accurately (Hagler and Honig, 1978; Cohen and Sternberg, 1980a,b). The lack of success presumably stems from the difficulties in modeling protein-solvent interactions, the use of analytical functions to approximate the chemical potential, and the compounding of these errors in the computed gradient; in addition, the energy surface has multiple minima, which make it nearly impossible to locate a global minimum. Attempts at solving these problems are underway. Molecular dynamics offers solutions to these problems but remains computationally limited as a technique for studying chain folding (McCammon et al., 1977). Chain folding is thought to take place in the milli­ second time scale (Baldwin, 1980). Elaborate computing resources must be applied to sample 100 nsec in the life of a small protein (Post et at., 1986). One of the first attempts to predict the conformation of a protein, ribonuclease, was that of Scheraga (1960). This model used the available chemical information, deuterium-hydrogen exchange data, and the knowledge of the a helix. It later was shown to have little similarity to the native molecule. The prediction of the secondary structure of protein conformation was pioneered by Guzzo (1965). By analysis of the known sequences and structures of myoglobin and the a- and l3-hemoglobins, he found that groups of amino acids were helix disrupters. He also empha­ sized the role of hydrophobic interactions. He noted that Blout (1962) had pointed out that the known poly(a-amino acids) fall into two categories, helix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Computation and Visualization of Protein Topology Graphs Including Ligand Information
    Computation and Visualization of Protein Topology Graphs Including Ligand Information Tim Schäfer1, Patrick May2, and Ina Koch1 1 Institute of Computer Science, Department of Molecular Bioinformatics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt (Main), Robert-Mayer-Straße 11–15, 60325 Frankfurt (Main), Germany, [email protected] 2 Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Campus Belval, 7 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, L–4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg Abstract Motivation: Ligand information is of great interest to understand protein function. Protein structure topology can be modeled as a graph with secondary structure elements as vertices and spatial contacts between them as edges. Meaningful representations of such graphs in 2D are required for the visual inspection, comparison and analysis of protein folds, but their automatic visualization is still challenging. We present an approach which solves this task, supports different graph types and can optionally include ligand contacts. Results: Our method extends the field of protein structure description and visualization by including ligand information. It generates a mathematically unique representation and high- quality 2D plots of the secondary structure of a protein based on a protein-ligand graph. This graph is computed from 3D atom coordinates in PDB files and the corresponding SSE assignments of the DSSP algorithm. The related software supports different notations and allows a rapid visualization of protein structures. It can also export graphs in various standard file formats so they can be used with other software. Our approach visualizes ligands in relationship to protein structure topology and thus represents a useful tool for exploring protein structures. Availability: The software is released under an open source license and available at http://www.bioinformatik.uni-frankfurt.de/ in the Software section under Visualization of Protein Ligand Graphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Energy Landscapes for Folding Α-Helical Transmembrane Proteins
    Predictive energy landscapes for folding α-helical transmembrane proteins Bobby L. Kim, Nicholas P. Schafer, and Peter G. Wolynes1 Departments of Chemistry and Physics and Astronomy and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 Contributed by Peter G. Wolynes, June 11, 2014 (sent for review May 19, 2014; reviewed by Zaida A. Luthey-Schulten, Shoji Takada, and Margaret Cheung) We explore the hypothesis that the folding landscapes of mem- folding. Starting with Khorana’swork(7),numerousα-helical brane proteins are funneled once the proteins’ topology within the transmembrane proteins have been refolded from a chemically membrane is established. We extend a protein folding model, denatured state in vitro (8). This indicates that at least some the associative memory, water-mediated, structure, and energy transmembrane domains may not require the translocon to fold model (AWSEM) by adding an implicit membrane potential and properly. In addition, recent experiments on a few α-helical reoptimizing the force field to account for the differing nature of transmembrane proteins have succeeded in characterizing the the interactions that stabilize proteins within lipid membranes, structure of transition state ensembles, in a manner like that used yielding a model that we call AWSEM-membrane. Once the pro- for globular proteins. These studies suggest that native contacts tein topology is set in the membrane, hydrophobic attractions are important in the folding nucleus but may not represent the play a lesser role in finding the native structure, whereas po- whole story (9, 10). Whether membrane proteins possess energy lar–polar attractions are more important than for globular pro- landscapes as funneled as globular proteins remains an open teins.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Sequencing Production of Ions for Mass Spectrometry
    Lecture 1 Introduction- Protein Sequencing Production of Ions for Mass Spectrometry Nancy Allbritton, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Physiology & Biophysics 824-9137 (office) [email protected] Office- Rm D349 Medical Science D Bldg. Introduction to Proteins Amino Acid- structural unit of a protein α carbon Amino acids- linked by peptide (amide) bond Amino Acids Proteins- 20 amino acids (Recall DNA- 4 bases) R groups- Varying size, shape, charge, H-bonding capacity, & chemical reactivity Introduction to Proteins Polypeptide Chain (Protein) - Many amino acids linked by peptide bonds By convention: Residue 1 starts at amino terminus. Polypeptides- a. Main chain i.e. regularly repeating portion b. Side chains- variable portion Introduction to Proteins 25,000 human genes >2X106 proteins Natural Proteins - Typically 50-2000 amino acids i.e. 550-220,000 molecular weight Over 200 different types of post-translational modifications. Ex: proteolysis, phosphorylation, acetylation, glycosylation S S S S S S Ex: Insulin Protein Complexity Is Very Large Over 200 different types of post-translational modifications. The Problem of Protein Sequencing. Edman Degradation: Step-wise cleavage of an amino acid from the amino terminus of a peptide. Alanine Gly 1 2 Reacts with uncharged NH3 1 2 Gly 1 2 Cyclizes & Releases in Mild Acid H N-Gly 2 2 2 PTH-Alanine Edman Degradation 1. Must be short peptide (<50 a.a.) amino acid release- 98% efficiency proteins- must fragment (CNBr or trypsin) Trypsin 2. Frequently fails due to a blocked amino terminus 3. Intolerant of impurities 4. Tedious & time consuming (hours-days) 1 amino acid cycle- 2 hours Solution: Mass Spectrometry 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Was Invented by Oleg Ptitsyn
    biomolecules Review The Future of Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Was Invented by Oleg Ptitsyn 1, 1, 1 2 1,3 Daniel Rademaker y, Jarek van Dijk y, Willem Titulaer , Joanna Lange , Gert Vriend and Li Xue 1,* 1 Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboudumc, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (J.v.D.); [email protected] (W.T.); [email protected] (G.V.) 2 Bio-Prodict, 6511 AA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Baco Institute of Protein Science (BIPS), Mindoro 5201, Philippines * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 15 May 2020; Accepted: 2 June 2020; Published: 16 June 2020 Abstract: When Oleg Ptitsyn and his group published the first secondary structure prediction for a protein sequence, they started a research field that is still active today. Oleg Ptitsyn combined fundamental rules of physics with human understanding of protein structures. Most followers in this field, however, use machine learning methods and aim at the highest (average) percentage correctly predicted residues in a set of proteins that were not used to train the prediction method. We show that one single method is unlikely to predict the secondary structure of all protein sequences, with the exception, perhaps, of future deep learning methods based on very large neural networks, and we suggest that some concepts pioneered by Oleg Ptitsyn and his group in the 70s of the previous century likely are today’s best way forward in the protein secondary structure prediction field.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Pk, Values of the Histidine Side
    Protein Science (1997), 6:1937-1944. Cambridge University Press. Printed in the USA Copyright 0 1997 The Protein Society Determination of pK, values of the histidine side chains of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C from Bacillus cereus by NMR spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis TUN LIU, MARGRET RYAN, FREDERICK W. DAHLQUIST, AND 0. HAYES GRIFFITH Institute of Molecular Biology and Department of Chemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 (RECEIVEDDecember 4, 1996: ACCEPTEDMay 19, 1997) Abstract Two active site histidine residues have been implicated in the catalysis of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). In this report, we present the first study of the pK,, values of histidines of a PI-PLC. All six histidines of Bacillus cereus PI-PLC were studied by 2D NMR spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis. The protein was selec- tively labeled with '3C"-histidine. A series of 'H-I3C HSQC NMR spectra were acquired over a pH range of 4.0-9.0. Five of the six histidines have been individually substituted with alanine to aid the resonance assignments in the NMR spectra. Overall, the remaining histidines in the mutants show little chemical shift changes in the 'H-"C HSQC spectra, indicating that the alanine substitution has no effect on the tertiary structure of the protein. H32A and H82A mutants are inactive enzymes, while H92A and H61A are fully active, and H81A retains about 15% of the wild-type activity. The active site histidines, His32 and His82, display pK,, values of 7.6 and 6.9, respectively. His92 and His227 exhibit pK, values of 5.4 and 6.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Families and the Structural Relatedness Among Globular Proteins
    Protein Science (1993), 2, 884-899. Cambridge University Press. Printed in the USA. Copyright 0 1993 The Protein Society -~~ ~~~~ ~ Families and the structural relatedness among globular proteins DAVID P. YEE AND KEN A. DILL Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California94143-1204 (RECEIVEDJanuary 6, 1993; REVISEDMANUSCRIPT RECEIVED February 18, 1993) Abstract Protein structures come in families. Are families “closely knit” or “loosely knit” entities? We describe a mea- sure of relatedness among polymer conformations. Based on weighted distance maps, this measure differs from existing measures mainly in two respects: (1) it is computationally fast, and (2) it can compare any two proteins, regardless of their relative chain lengths or degree of similarity. It does not require finding relative alignments. The measure is used here to determine the dissimilarities between all 12,403 possible pairs of 158 diverse protein structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (PDB). Combined with minimal spanning trees and hier- archical clustering methods,this measure is used to define structural families. It is also useful for rapidly searching a dataset of protein structures for specific substructural motifs.By using an analogy to distributions of Euclid- ean distances, we find that protein families are not tightly knit entities. Keywords: protein family; relatedness; structural comparison; substructure searches Pioneering work over the past 20 years has shown that positions after superposition. RMS is a useful distance proteins fall into families of related structures (Levitt & metric for comparingstructures that arenearly identical: Chothia, 1976; Richardson, 1981; Richardson & Richard- for example, when refining or comparing structures ob- son, 1989; Chothia & Finkelstein, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Three-Dimensional Structure of Proteins
    Chapter 4 The Three-Dimensional Structure of Proteins Multiple Choice Questions 1. Answer: D All of the following are considered “weak” interactions in proteins, except: A) hydrogen bonds. B) hydrophobic interactions. C) ionic bonds. D) peptide bonds. E) van der Waals forces. 2. Answer: D In an aqueous solution, protein conformation is determined by two major factors. One is the formation of the maximum number of hydrogen bonds. The other is the: A) formation of the maximum number of hydrophilic interactions. B) maximization of ionic interactions. C) minimization of entropy by the formation of a water solvent shell around the protein. D) placement of hydrophobic amino acid residues within the interior of the protein. E) placement of polar amino acid residues around the exterior of the protein. 3. 3 Answer: A In the diagram below, the plane drawn behind the peptide bond indicates the: A) absence of rotation around the C—N bond because of its partial double-bond character. B) plane of rotation around the C—N bond. C) region of steric hindrance determined by the large C=O group. D) region of the peptide bond that contributes to a Ramachandran plot. E) theoretical space between –180 and +180 degrees that can be occupied by the and angles in the peptide bond. 4. Answer: D Which of the following best represents the backbone arrangement of two peptide bonds? A) C—N—C—C—C—N—C—C B) C—N—C—C—N—C C) C—N—C—C—C—N D) C—C—N—C—C—N Chapter 4 The Three-Dimensional Structure of Proteins E) C—C—C—N—C—C—C 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformational Properties of Constrained Proline Analogues and Their Application in Nanobiology”
    UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA DEPARTAMENT D’ENGINYERIA QUÍMICA “CONFORMATIONAL PROPERTIES OF CONSTRAINED PROLINE ANALOGUES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN NANOBIOLOGY” Alejandra Flores Ortega Supervisors: Dr. Carlos Alemán Llansó and Dr. Jordi Casanovas Salas. th Barcelona, 27 January 2009 “Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can exist without a cause”. François-Marie Arouet, Voltaire “Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it, we go nowhere”. Carl Sagan iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge to Dr. Carlos Aleman and Dr. Jordi Cassanovas Salas for an interesting research theme, and scientific support. I gratefully acknowledge to Dr. David Zanuy for interesting suggestions and strong discussions, without their support this would be an unfulfilled task. Also I, would like to address my thanks to all my colleagues in my group and department, specially Elaine Armelin for assiting me in many different ways. I thank not only my friends, but also colleagues for helping me to overcome the stressful time, without whom it would have been difficult to cope up. I wish to express my gratefulness to my parents, specially to my mother, María Esther, for all his care, and support. Also I will like to thanks to my friends and specially Jesus, Merches, Laura y Arturo. My PhD thesis have been finished for all this support. I am greatly indepted to Dr. Ruth Nussinov at NCI, Dr. Carlos Cativiela at the University of Zaragoza and Ana I. Jiménez at the “Instituto de Ciencias de Materiales de Aragon” for a collaborative effort. I wish to thank all my colleague in the “Chimie et Biochimie Théoriques, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques” in Nancy France, I will be grateful to have worked with : Pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Folding and the Organization of the Protein Topology Universe
    Opinion TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.30 No.1 January 2005 Protein folding and the organization of the protein topology universe Kresten Lindorff-Larsen1, Peter Røgen2, Emanuele Paci3, Michele Vendruscolo1 and Christopher M. Dobson1 1University of Cambridge, Department of Chemistry, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, UK, CB2 1EW 2Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark, Building 303, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark 3University of Zu¨ rich, Department of Biochemistry, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zu¨ rich, Switzerland The mechanism by which proteins fold to their native ensembles has shown that establishing the correct overall states has been the focus of intense research in recent topology of the polypeptide chain is a crucial aspect of years. The rate-limiting event in the folding reaction is protein folding. This observation is in accord with a series the formation of a conformation in a set known as the of studies that have shown that the folding rate of a transition-state ensemble. The structural features pre- protein, to a first approximation, can be related to the sent within such ensembles have now been analysed for entropic cost of forming the native-like topology [16–22]. a series of proteins using data from a combination of The structural changes occurring during protein fold- biochemical and biophysical experiments together with ing have also been analysed in detail for a series of computer-simulation methods. These studies show that proteins and we discuss some of these studies here. The the topology of the transition state is determined by a results enable the topological view of folding to be set of interactions involving a small number of key reconciled with the well-established concept of nucleation residues and, in addition, that the topology of the [23] by showing that – despite the many different ways in transition state is closer to that of the native state than which a given topology could, in principle, be generated – to that of any other fold in the protein universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacquelyn S. Fetrow
    Jacquelyn S. Fetrow President and Professor of Chemistry Albright College Curriculum Vitae Office of the President Work Email: [email protected] Library and Administration Building Office Phone: 610-921-7600 N. 13th and Bern Streets, P.O. Box 15234 Reading, PA 19612 Education Ph.D. Biological Chemistry, December, 1986 B.S. Biochemistry, May, 1982 Department of Biological Chemistry Albright College, Reading, PA The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA Graduated summa cum laude Loops: A Novel Class of Protein Secondary Structure Thesis Advisor: George D. Rose Professional Experience Albright College, Reading PA President and Professor of Chemistry June 2017-present University of Richmond, Richmond, VA Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs July 2014-December 2016 Professor of Chemistry July 2014-May 2017 Responsibilities as Provost: Chief academic administrator for all academic matters for the University of Richmond, a university with five schools (Arts and Sciences, Business, Law, Leadership, and Professional and Continuing Studies), ~400 faculty and ~3300 full-time undergraduate and graduate students; manage the ~$91.8M annual operating budget of the Academic Affairs Division, as well as endowment and gift accounts; oversee Richmond’s Bonner Center of Civic Engagement (engage.richmond.edu), Center for International Education (international.richmond.edu), Registrar (registrar.richmond.edu), Office of Institutional Effectiveness (ifx.richmond.edu), as well as other programs and staff; partner with VP
    [Show full text]
  • 9 3 Innovirolgy Examples and Applications
    9.3: Examples and applications 1) Now that you have an understanding of the mechanisms behind the phage display system, let’s have a look at how it’s used in research. i) Phage display has a broad spectrum of applications. This can go from improvement of enzymes, to proteome analysis or drug and target discovery but is certainly not restricted to these. 2) The first thing I want to focus on is the optimization of enzymes. A large variety of enzymes are being used today in different fields of industry and biotech. These enzymes are originally made by organisms for a specific function in a specific niche or environment, like inside the cell cytoplasm. Therefore, they often have undesirable properties for the function or environment we want to use them in. They might not work fast enough, be unstable in the conditions they are used in or do not work on the desired substrate. Phage display can aid in improving these enzymes by selecting for example for better thermostability, activity or enhanced substrate binding. i) Let’s start with stability. Take for example an enzyme that is normally present In a cell at cytoplasm at 37°C. However when we use it in an industrial process where we need 50°C, the enzyme becomes unstable and denatures. In phage display we can make a library of mutagenized enzyme and display them on, in this case, the gene 3 protein of the phage. In the binding step of the biopanning most phages will not be able to bind the enzyme substrate at 50°C as they are denatured.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Molecule Peptide Fingerprinting
    Single-molecule peptide fingerprinting Jetty van Ginkela,b, Mike Filiusa,b, Malwina Szczepaniaka,b, Pawel Tulinskia,b, Anne S. Meyera,b,1, and Chirlmin Joo (주철민)a,b,1 aKavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2629HZ Delft, The Netherlands; and bDepartment of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2629HZ Delft, The Netherlands Edited by Alan R. Fersht, Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and approved February 21, 2018 (received for review May 1, 2017) Proteomic analyses provide essential information on molecular To obtain ordered determination of fluorescently labeled amino pathways of cellular systems and the state of a living organism. acids, we needed a molecular probe that can scan a peptide in a Mass spectrometry is currently the first choice for proteomic processive manner. We adopted a naturally existing molecular analysis. However, the requirement for a large amount of sample machinery, the AAA+ protease ClpXP from Escherichia coli.The renders a small-scale proteomics study challenging. Here, we ClpXP protein complex is an enzymatic motor that unfolds and demonstrate a proof of concept of single-molecule FRET-based degrades protein substrates. ClpX monomers form a homohexa- + protein fingerprinting. We harnessed the AAA protease ClpXP to meric ring (ClpX6) that can exercise a large mechanical force to scan peptides. By using donor fluorophore-labeled ClpP, we se- unfold proteins using ATP hydrolysis (11, 12). Through iterative quentially read out FRET signals from acceptor-labeled amino acids rounds of force-generating power strokes, ClpX6 translocates of peptides. The repurposed ClpXP exhibits unidirectional process- substrates through the center of its ring in a processive manner ing with high processivity and has the potential to detect low- (13, 14), with extensive promiscuity toward unnatural substrate abundance proteins.
    [Show full text]