NEWS-CLIPS October 21/2020 to November 20/2020
Note: Due to the abundance of articles related to COVID-19 only a select few are listed here.
3 Metro Vancouver employees fired in connection with deadly Cleveland Dam water surge.pdf 412 residential units proposed near Lynn Creek.pdf A strong society must encourage - not limit - debate.pdf All-rental project goes to public hearing in DNV.pdf Broad Upzoning Makes Housing Less Affordable.pdf Concern grows over city hall conflict case.pdf Court action aims to remove Vancouver city councillor from office.pdf COVID-19 cases top 900 in North Shore health region.pdf District of North Van OK-s affordable housing partner for Delbrook.pdf DNV fireworks ban should go to referendum.pdf DNV moves on affordable rental housing in Delbrook.pdf Due to water main construction.pdf E-bike pilot rolls forward in City of North Vancouver.pdf Each Country Share of CO2 Emissions.pdf Election night results give Liberal Karin Kirkpatrick the projected win in West Vancouver-Capilano.pdf France lockdown - what went wrong and what can Canada learn.pdf Here is why TranLink does not enforce its manditory mask policy.pdf Illegal hostel owner Emily Yu evicted from North Van townhouse.pdf Info meeting online for apartment project near Phibbs Exchange.pdf Lack of exposures and global data show virus threat low on transit.pdf Lynn Valley homeowner ordered - clean up or pay up.pdf Moderna Vaccine 94.5 percent effective against COVID-19.pdf Multi-day events linked to COVID-19 surge in BC.pdf North Van-Seymour candidates debate.pdf Notice - DNV Solid Waste Bylaw Changes.pdf Notice - New Mountain Highway on-ramp set to open.pdf Notice - Port of Vancouver land use plan amendment.pdf Notice - Public Hearing for 904 Lytton St.pdf Notice - Public Meeting on rezoning 1565-1589 Rupert Str.pdf Notice - West Vancouver Public Hearing vs DNV Public Hearing.pdf Notice - Where are the dads.pdf Notice -DNV Property Disposition.pdf NPA set sights on Wiebe.pdf PM changes tone on freedom of speech.pdf Power outages planned in North Vancouver in November.pdf Rise in Fraser Health cases creates worry.pdf Second COVID-19 exposure reported at Handsworth Secondary.pdf Seniors in care homes dying of loneliness.pdf The next pandemic.pdf The North Shore political landscape looks different.pdf TransLink announces CEO Kevin Desmond to leave organization in early 2021.pdf Trudeau announces plan to purchase 76 million doses of Covid vaccine.pdf UN committee member stresses human rights.pdf Understanding aerosol transmission could be key to controlling coronavirus.pdf Vancouver outlines its Climate Emergency Action Plan.pdf Vancouver weighs the cost of climate action and inaction.pdf West Van making plans to face rising sea levels.pdf What happens when a local newspaper dies.pdf What We Know About the Airborne Spread of the Coronavirus.pdf Why local decisions on road pricing and sprawl matter in a climate crisis.pdf 3 Metro Vancouver employees fired in connection with deadly Cleveland Dam water surge Father and son were killed in early October after torrent of water was released due to human error Michelle Ghoussoub · CBC News · Posted: Oct 30, 2020 1:55 PM PT | Last Updated: 12 hours ago https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/cleveland-dam-employees-fired-1.5784364
The Cleveland Dam was down to a trickle on Oct. 5 after a sudden surge of water killed two people downstream. (Yvette Brend/CBC News) Three Metro Vancouver employees have been fired in connection with a deadly water surge that occurred when a spillway gate at the Cleveland Dam in North Vancouver opened unexpectedly during maintenance in early October. A torrent of water was suddenly released into the Capilano River. Two men, a father and son who were downstream, were killed as a result. A preliminary report released a week after the Oct. 1 surge later found human error related to the programming of the control system was the "clearest contributing factor" in the tragedy. "Metro Vancouver continues to co-operate fully with external agencies in their investigations and will not be providing further comment at this time," said the regional district in a statement. When the water surged down the river, rising by three metres in a matter of minutes, it hit a popular fishing spot where a number of anglers were fishing. Two people pulled into the water were rescued and two swam to shore. Others standing near the water managed to scramble to higher ground before they were hit by the surge. Video Human error 'clearest contributing factor' in deadly Cleveland Dam incident: preliminary report The preliminary report was released amid calls for Metro Vancouver to make the dam safer. There is currently no siren or alarm system to warn people if the dam malfunctions. Such a warning system was never installed because of concerns the noise would annoy residents in the Glenmore and Grouse Woods neighbourhoods less than 400 metres away, according to engineering reports from the early 2000s. The dam, built in 1954, has a history of malfunctioning. Inspection reports from WorkSafeBC detail two errors that left people in danger in 2002.
412 residential units proposed near Lynn Creek STAFF REPORT November 13, 2020 11:43am https://www.northshoredailypost.com/412-residential-units-proposed-near-lynn-creek/ District of North Vancouver staff is seeking council direction on a rezoning application by Seylynn North Shore Development to redevelop 24 existing lots for a mixed-use development with up to 412 residential units. The development site at 1505-1571 Fern Street, 520-540 Mountain Highway, and 1514-1568 Hunter Street, is approximately 3.2 acres in size. The project called Seylynn Gardens includes 206 market rental units, 42 non-market rental units, 164 strata units. The development will consist of one eight-storey rental building, one 19-storey mixed-use building, one seven- storey condo and another eight-storey condo building.
Under the Zoning Bylaw, the project would require a minimum of 672 parking stalls for residential purposes, 103 parking stalls for visitors, and 28 parking stalls for commercial purposes for a total of 803 stalls. The application, however, proposes 416 parking stalls for residential purposes, 42 stalls for visitors, and an additional 28 stalls for commercial purposes for a total of 486 stalls. This is more than what the District of North Vancouver asks for as the district’s policies allow reduced parking in town centres. “It is anticipated that some component of the commercial parking spaces would be designated for shared use to allow use by residential visitors during times of low demand from commercial patrons,” according to the staff report. The development also proposes non-market units that are as follows: 24 one-bedroom units, 15 two-bedroom units, and 3 three-bedroom units. The applicant is targeting rents for the non-market units that match the Metro Vancouver median rents as published in the CMHC Rental Market Survey, according to a staff report to the council. The developer is proposing 824 bike parking spaces, which exceeds the requirement in the District’s Zoning Bylaw. “In conjunction with the cycling infrastructure improvements proposed, the bicycle parking in the project should help to reduce reliance on private vehicle use for residents and visitors to the project,” the staff report says. The development also includes dedication and construction of a new north and south public lane through the site to connect Hunter Street to Fern Street, as well as the dedication and construction of a portion of Lynn Creek Town Centre’s “green spine” linear park at the east side of the development.
Leslyn Lewis: A strong society must encourage, not limit, debate
Many Canadians long for the days when holding your own in a verbal disagreement was not only allowed, but seen as a sign of intellect
Author of the article: Leslyn Lewis, National Post Publishing date: Nov 14, 2020 https://nationalpost.com/opinion/leslyn-lewis-a-strong-society-must-encourage-not-limit-debate
"The days of raising strong children who would not allow words to 'break their bones' are gone," writes Leslyn Lewis.
The old childhood adage, “Stick and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me,” is dead. This simple phrase, quoted by so many from my generation, has helped a lot of parents explain a simple truth to children: no matter what someone says to you, your feelings and emotions are your own responsibility. We understood that people might have a bad opinion of us, and they might even say bad things about us, but their words could only hurt us if we let them.
Today, however, people are not free to disagree, and even an innocent or naive verbal misstep can have dire consequences. This is most evident in our current political climate. While “PC culture” has been an issue for years, it has taken a sudden turn towards a cultish “us” versus “them” narrative. You are either “woke” and “on the right side of history,” or you are evil, backwards and full of hate. Like any cult, loyalty must be 100 per cent, and to question a single point of their narrative is enough to get you “cancelled.” This radical movement to suppress dialogue, speech and even beliefs is often supported by the media, which dictates what is and isn’t fact. Reported news is replaced by opinions and commentaries. Once these unsubstantiated facts are planted in the mind, they form a belief system that becomes very difficult to change: the connection to the belief and those who agree with it creates an emotional attachment to a warped version of reality, similar to how cults recruit and hold adherents.
Canadian society has sped quickly towards an echo chamber, in which the occupants no longer tolerate the slightest disagreement. Rather than debating another person’s opinion, it is now acceptable to refute an argument by claiming it is “false,” a “lie” or “unscientific.”
Of course, it doesn’t matter how truthful or scientific anything actually is, if it is counter to the woke narrative, it must be a lie. No facts, scientific evidence or data is necessary in order for people to accept that a statement is a lie. After a person is successfully labelled a liar, then that person’s difference of opinion relegates her to the category of an enemy of the state.
Everything is now seen through the lens of good guys and bad guys, and being labelled as a bad guy means that you can be fired from your job or kicked out of school, not because of your job performance or your grades, but because of your beliefs. Being “them” means you can be banned from social media, and even ostracized in real life social circles, because your words of disagreement are now treated as actual violence if someone’s feelings are hurt.
The days of raising strong children who would not allow words to “break their bones” are gone. We are left with frail adults who claim victimhood as a means to suppress speech and lord over their alleged oppressor. We have come to devalue personal responsibility — namely, the responsibility to acknowledge that your reaction to someone else’s words is on you. We have moved away from the recognition that we control our own emotions, and that someone else’s opinions cannot harm us, unless we allow it to.
Free speech is dying, but there is hope for the human spirit to return to its origin of freedom, free will, free speech and free belief. It starts with a willingness to see information through the lens of truth. We must rebel against the movement to disconnect reality from facts, and return to a society that encourages dialogue and seeks out truth, in the spirit of philosophers like Socrates, Plato and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
The human spirit may be muted, but it cannot be silenced. It is intrinsically tied to our freedom to believe and to speak our minds. There is much to learn from discovering that one is wrong or right about any particular subject. A good argument between two people who counter each other’s ideas until both emerge wiser, whether they ultimately end up agreeing or not, is a necessary part of human development and a strong society.
I have heard so many Canadians tell me that they long for the days when holding your own in a verbal disagreement was not only allowed, but seen as a sign of intellect. The extreme tribalism that is silencing dissenting opinions has resulted in a fractured society, and has no place in a democracy. I believe that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the innate human spirit that longs to be free requires us to defend our ability to have a plurality of opinions — and to voice them.
Maybe you think I’m wrong here. To that I simply say that I respectfully disagree.
National Post
Leslyn Lewis will be running for the Conservative Party of Canada in the riding of Haldimand-Norfolk in the next federal election.
All-rental project goes to public hearing in District of North Van Much larger project looms on Mountain Highway Brent Richter / North Shore News November 5, 2020 03:55 PM https://www.nsnews.com/news/all-rental-project-goes-to-public-hearing-in-district-of-north-van-1.24234160
An artist's rendering shows how an all-rental building at 1515 Oxford Street might look if approved by District of North Vancouver council. image TPL Developments Oxford General Partnership An all-rental housing project in Lynn Creek has cleared its first hurdle at District of North Vancouver council and is headed for public hearing. A second, much larger proposal up the street, however, is facing a much tougher prospect of success. District council voted on Nov. 2 to advance a six-storey, 140-unit rental building at 1515-1555 Oxford St. and 220 Mountain Highway near Main Street. Six of the units will be retained by Hollyburn Family Services for rentals at 20 per cent below market rates. The building will have 0.72 parking stalls per unit. The site currently holds six single-family homes. Although there were quibbles over parking, potential greenhouse gas emissions and access to the below-market suites, the proposal stoked little opposition from council. “I do think that it is the right kind of housing in close proximity to transit,” said Mayor Mike Little. With only three per cent of the district’s homes purpose-built rentals, 140 new units coming onto the market will be a big improvement, added Coun. Mathew Bond. Up the road at 420-460 Mountain Hwy. and 1510-1530 Crown St., where Dykhof Nurseries and a stretch of five single-family homes stand, a sizable mixed-use project is facing tougher scrutiny from council. The proposal, which is in the pre-application phase, would see 222 strata units built in a 29-storey tower and two townhouse buildings, 45 non-market rentals and 105 market rentals in two five-storey buildings, as well as more than 30,000 square feet of commercial space. Couns. Lisa Muri, Jim Hanson and Betty Forbes said the project would be a non-starter for them largely because it had too many market strata units. “From my point of view, it's too high. Twenty-nine stories in this location, at this time, I don't believe has community support,” said Hanson. “I would support a smaller project with lower height and with more rental.” Couns. Bond and Jordan Back said they would like to see the proposal proceed through the usual process. Back said property is meant to be an important piece in the Lynn Creek town centre and the strata units would be needed to make the rest of the rentals and commercial space viable. “One of the important elements is the grocery store. I've talked to a lot of people down in that area and that's something that they were promised and we haven't delivered for them yet,” he said. Little and Coun. Megan Curren both said they’d like to see the proposal revised rather than go ahead as-is or be scrapped. Little said the site has long been envisioned for high density, although maybe not as much as the developer is proposing. And he worried the siting of a plaza at the north end of the site would hamper the district’s ability to build social housing on the site of the District of North Vancouver Fire and Rescue Services hall No. 2 if decommissioned at a future date. District staff will now meet with the developer to see if the proposal can be changed in such a a way that it could achieve consensus support at council.
An artist's rendering shows how a redevelopment of the Dykhof Nurseries site at 420 Mountain Hwy. may look if it proceeds. image IBI Group Architects © 2020 North Shore News
Broad Upzoning Makes Housing Less Affordable, And Doesn’t Add Supply
October 30, 2020 https://betterdwelling.com/broad-upzoning-makes-housing-less-affordable-and-doesnt-add-supply/
Politicians are increasingly discussing broad upzoning as a housing affordability solution. Instead of one home on a property, you can now build two homes on the same amount of land. All across the city, in some cases. The assumption is if there’s two homes on a property, it’ll be half the price. Makes sense, right? There’s a reason politicians let people come to their own conclusions, without explaining the impact. It’s because that’s not at all how it works, and the industry has long known this. Real Estate Is Priced By Highest And Best Use
Real estate values are determined by the “highest and best use” the property has. The catchy phrase means the optimum use determines value. It doesn’t really matter what the current use is, if there’s a cost effective and better use. This isn’t a secret real estate investor tactic you learn at airport Marriott conventions either. It’s a basic rule for everyone in the real estate industry – from agents to appraisers.
Still not clear? Let’s do an example of two similar lots, in a fictitious world without zoning. The first lot has a house on it, and the second a commercial building. Similar houses in the neighborhood go for about $1,000,000, and similar commercial buildings for $2,000,000. In this neighborhood, say it costs $50,000 to demolish a house, and about $300,000 all in to build a commercial building.
Knowing this, instantly changes the value of the property with the house. The property with the house on it is now worth $1,650,000. That’s the value of the commercial property, minus tearing down the house, and building a commercial building. Even if you plan on buying it to use as a house, you need to pay the value for it’s best use, not current use. In this case, it’s conversion to a commercial building. Now, how does anyone ever get a house? That’s why zoning exists. Limited Zoning Can Actually Preserve Affordability To prevent over use of developing for booms and busts, regions use zoning. Zoning is when governments define the type of use a property can have. This prevents the “highest and best use” rule from dominating short-term trends. Instead of the highest and best use for all types of properties, it’s just the best use for the specific zoning type. For example, residential zoning would require a change in zoning to build anything other than housing.
In the above example, let’s say the house is restricted by zoning to its current use. If the house is unable to be converted to a commercial property, it can only be traded as a house. Not optimal for the person selling the house, who wants a maximum theoretical profit. However, it’s great for a homebuyer looking to buy a house and not knock it down. As you might have guessed, zoning can have a massive impact on the value of property. Broad Upzoning Makes Existing Housing More Expensive
You might already be able to spot the issue with broad upzoning now, but let’s spell it out. Politicians lead people to believe buying half a property will be more affordable. Unfortunately, broad upzoning doesn’t actually build homes. It only increases the value of every lot’s potential to build homes. Where there was one house, you can now build two.
Existing homes are immediately worth the value of the maximum zoning, less the cost of knocking it down and building two. Every property now requires a real estate developer to get the full value of use. Since real estate developers don’t do it for free, you also need to inject profit into the cost as well. In short, politicians increased the cost of housing, without actually building more housing, all in the name of affordability. Broad Upzoning Also Fails To Create New Housing
Well, that sucks – but at least housing is built, right? Two unaffordable houses are better than one? Not exactly. An MIT study that hoped to prove upzoning led to more supply and falling rents, accidentally proved the opposite. Instead, the researcher found rents and prices both increased. Further, it didn’t actually create any additional housing. The author concluded, “short-term, local-level impacts of upzoning are higher property prices but no additional new housing construction.”
Sure, more housing needs to be created – that’s a given. However, broad upzoning of whole areas, possibly cities, doesn’t make sense if the goal is improved affordability. In this regard, planned and controlled upzoning makes a lot more sense. It’s also worth noting when these discussions appear – right after strong price growth, as prices pull back. It’s almost never at the bottom of the market, when price growth would be minimally impacted.