DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophia Program Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophia Program Draft philoSOPHIA CONFERENCE PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS Memorial University, Signal Hill Campus, St. John’s, Newfoundland, May ?-AA PLEASE NOTE: Workshops are closed to everyone but presenters. Panels and plenary sessions are open to all. Thursday, May ? ":$$-&:$$ PM Registration (Atrium) PLENARY SESSION: LEE MARACLE (UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO) &:$$-):*$ PM “Decolonization, Continental Feminism, and Indigeneity” (B#$$W) Chair: Max Liboiron, Associate VP (Indigenous Research), Memorial University :*$-0$:$$ PM RECEPTION (B) Friday, May AJ :*$-1:*$ Registration (Atrium) and Coffee (B) PANEL : FEMINISM AND CONSENT (B#$$Wb) WORKSHOP A: FOUCAULT AND WYNTER: LUCINDA VANDERVORT, A PHILOSOPHICAL ENCOUNTER WITH “Conceptions of Individual and AND AGAINST THE HUMAN (B%$$%) Group Consent in the #%st Century” WORKSHOP COORDINATORS: CALEB WARD, “Locating Lynne Huffer and Taryn Jordan Responsibility to a Partner within PARTICIPANTS: Haylee Harrell, Ege Selin Structural Critiques of SeXual Consent” Islekel, Rebecca Longtin, Elaine Miller, ABBY KLUCHIN, “Feeling Willing: Toward Mukasa Mubirumusoke, an Intersubjective Theory of Consent” Elisabeth Paque_e Chair: Jordan Van Den Hoonaard :*$ AM– WORKSHOP B: FEMINIST (Memorial University) :*$ AM SOLIDARITIES (B%$$#) PANEL : TRANS SUBJECTIVITY (B%$$d) FLORENTIEN VERHAGE, “Surging FANNY SÖDERBÄCK, “Fantastic from the Wreckage of Colonialism” Antigones: Queer Deaths, Trans WHITNEY RONSHAGEN, “Eating Lives, and the Right to Grieve” Together as ‘World’-Travelling” JILL DROUILLARD, “The King Was MALIHEH DEYHIM (Graduate Student Pregnant: Reproductive Ethics Essay Prize Winner), “But a Piece of and Transgender Pregnancy” Clothing: On Removing the Hijab” DAZE JEFFERIES, “Drowned Knowing: Fragments TABOR FISHER, “Space-Time and Social toward Island Trans Fishy Subjectivities”* Location: Re-placing Intersectionality” Chair: Evan Gray (Memorial University) ‘ :DE AM – PLENARY SESSION: KELLY OLIVER (VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY) :0E PM “The Special Plight of Women Refugees” (B#$$W)* :0E-:0E PM Boxed lunch (for presenters), guided walk up Signal Hill WORKSHOP C: AFFECT AND PANEL *: DECOLONIZATION INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS (B%$$%) AND INDIGENEITY (B#$$Wb) KYM MACLAREN, “Criminalization CAROL-LYNNE D‘ARCANGELIS, “Reading and the Self-Constituting Resistance in the Works of María Lugones Dynamics of Distrust” and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson” LISA MADURA, “Anti-Social SONJA BOON AND KATE LAHEY, Habit and Critical Disruption” “The Impossibility of a Future in the ALI BEHELER, “What is a Mother? Absence of a Past: Drifting in the In-Between” The Interimplication of Agency VICKI HALLETT, “Floating in Se_ler-Colonial :0E PM– and Maternity” ConteXt: Meanings and Implications” :DE PM Chair: Samuel Underwood (Memorial University) WORKSHOP D: NATURE AND HEALTH (B%$$#) PANEL : THE PROPER AND THE IMPROPER: ALICE EVERLY, “Constructing Anew: AFFECT, HEALTH, AND SPEECH (B%$$d) Looping Effects, Sociogeny, SHILOH WHITNEY, “Decolonizing the and Systems of Social Value” Authenticity Critique of Affective Labor” TRISTANA MARTIN RUBIO, “Age, Time, JANE DRYDEN, “Gut Microbiome and the Politics of the ‘Biological Clock’” and Care of the Self” MARJOLEIN OELE, “The Dissolution of the PATRICIA DOLD, “Discourse on Female Body, Pregnant City: A Phenomenological Speech, and Identity in Hindu Narratives”* Account of Early Pregnancy Loss” Chair: Kristen Lewis (Memorial University) E:$$ PM– PLENARY SESSION: MARÍA LUGONES (BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY) (B#$$W) :*$ PM THIS SESSION IS CANCELLED :*$ PM Dinner (on your own) LEE MARACLE reads from HOPE MATTERS Eastern Edge Gallery, W# Harbour Drive (note location change!) :*$ PM Chair: Michelle Porter (Memorial University) Refreshments and cash bar Saturday, May AA :*$-1:*$ AM Registration and Coffee (B) WORKSHOP A: FOUCAULT AND PANEL : RACE IN ECOLOGY, SEXUALITY, AND WYNTER: A PHILOSOPHICAL DEMOGRAPHICS (Bb) (9:30 start time) ENCOUNTER WITH AND AGAINST THE ROMY OPPERMAN, “Thinking the Afterlife of Slavery HUMAN (B) (9:00 start time) Ecologically: Saidiya Hartman’s Natural History” WORKSHOP COORDINATORS: SABRINA L. HOM, “Rape Fantasies: Interracial SeXuality Lynne Huffer and Taryn Jordan and the Construction of ‘Pure’ White Desire” PARTICIPANTS: Haylee Harrell, Ege ANDREA J. PITTS, “A Death-Dealing Selin Islekel, Rebecca Longtin, Elaine Displacement of Difference: Crip Theory, Miller, Mukasa Mubirumusoke, Crimmigration, and Penal Abolitionism” Elisabeth Paque_e Chair: Elizabeth Hill (Memorial University) :/1:*$ AM– :$$ AM WORKSHOP B: FEMINIST SOLIDARITIES PANEL : ECOLOGICAL ETHICS AND (B%$$#) (9:30 start time) THE UNHUMAN GROUND OF IDENTITY LORNA QUIROGA, “Different (B%$$d) (9:30 start time) Ways of Weaving Gender, SUZANNE MCCULLAGH, “Becoming- for a Pluriverse Proposal” Woman and/or the Disappearance MAURA ROBERTS, “Relating in Place: of Woman in Ecological Ethics”* Engaging with Strawberries CASEY FORD, “Bodies, Vile and Virile: Bare and Indigenous Feminisms” Life in Lispector, CiXous, and Agamben” EMERSON BODDE, “Is Spinoza DANIEL GRIFFIN, “A New Flesh: David Cronenberg, a Decolonial Feminist?” Flesh-Images, and Queering the Male Body” Chair: Patrick Renaud (Memorial University) :0E AM– PLENARY DISCUSSION: FEMINISM’S FUTURE(S) (B#$$W) :DE PM Chair: Shannon Hoff (Memorial University) :DE–:* PM BUSINESS MEETING (open to all), lunch on your own WORKSHOP C: AFFECT AND PANEL &: WORKING TOWARD SOLIDARITY INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS (B%$$%) IN THE COLONIAL CONTEXT (B#$$Wb) ANNA E. MUDDE, “Crafting ELISABETH PAQUETTE, “Indigeneity and Presence in the World” Solidarity in Decolonial Theory: CELIA EDELL, “Theorizing the Persistence of On Sylvia Wynter and Jodi A. Byrd” :*$ PM– Oppression: Epistemology of Ignorance” SARAH M. KIZUK, “Se_ler Shame: :*$ PM KATHY KILOH, “On Eva Hesse’s A Critique of the Role of Shame Contingent: An Aesthetic Investigation in Se_ler Identity in Canada”* of Julia Kristeva’s Herethics”* ROXANA AKHBARI: “Se_ler Colonial ELDEN YUNGBLUT, “A Transfeminist Lands in the Age of Apology”* Mobilization of Luce Irigaray’s Chair: Amelia Harris (Memorial University) Strategy of Mimesis” WORKSHOP D: NATURE AND HEALTH (B%$$#) PANEL : QUEER NORMATIVITY (B%$$d) TALIA WELSH, “ A Feminist Critical STEPH BUTERA, “The Hope of Humanism: Phenomenology of Health Promotion” Queering Phenomenological Posthumanism” EMILY R. DOUGLAS, “Materializations of TYLER CARSON, “Engendering the :*$ PM– Illness and Somatic Capacitations” Anti-Social Thesis: The Queerness of :*$ PM SHANNON BOSS, “A Phenomenology of Pregnancy in Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts”* OrthoreXia: Health and Gender in SHAWN HUBERDEAU, “Feminism-On-Trial: Experiences of Dys-appearance”* Abjection as a Theory of Liberation” VICTORIA SMITH, “Women Embedded in Chair: Michelle Mahoney Nature: A Critique of Mellor’s Ecofeminism” (Memorial University) PLENARY SESSION: UMA NARAYAN (VASSAR UNIVERSITY) :DE PM – “How ‘Sisterhood’ Becomes ‘Doing Good’: Asymmetries of Positionality, Privilege :0E PM and Political Concern between Western Subjects and their Nonwestern Others” (B#$$W) Chair: Jennifer Dyer (Memorial University) :0E PM RECEPTION (B#$$W) :$$ PM BANQUET (B#$$W) * Presentation may include slides philoSOPHIA would like To Thank The following people and groups for Their supporT: Our hosts: The Department of Philosophy at Memorial University; the Staff and Facilities at Signal Hill Campus; Eastern Edge Gallery Our local organizers: Carol-Lynne D‘Arcangelis, Shannon Hoff, Victoria Smith (Memorial University) Our sponsors: The Departments of Philosophy, Religious Studies, Gender Studies, and English at Memorial University; Vice-President of Research; the Scholarship in the Arts Fund; the Office of Public Engagement Quick Start Fund Our Program CommiSee: Natalie Cisneros (Seale University), Jane Dryden (Mount Allison University), Shannon Hoff (Memorial University), Sabrina L. Hom (Georgia College), Katherine Loevy (Pacific University), Kym Maclaren (Ryerson University), Talia Welsh (University of Chaanooga-Tennessee) Our Executive CommiSee: Elaine Miller (EXecutive Director, Miami University), Lauren Guilmette (Assistant Director, Florida Atlantic University), Kelsey Borrowman (Villanova University), Alyson Cole (Queens College, CUNY), Namita Goswami (Indiana State University), Rachel Jones (George Mason University), Kyoo Lee (John Jay College, CUNY), Robert Leib (Florida Atlantic University), Ann Murphy (University of New MeXico), Kelly Oliver (Vanderbilt University), Elisabeth Paquette (University of North Carolina-Charlotte), David Pena-Guzman (San Francisco State University) ABSTRACTS Roxana Akhbari (York UniversiTy), “SetTler Colonial Lands in The Age of Apology: Segregation of IndigeneiTy and (Im)migration by The Canadian STaTe.” In the past few decades, there has been a global increase in nation state apologies to racialized communities, leading to the designation of the “age of apology” for describing our time. In Canada, apologies are made to various immigrant and Indigenous populations, but they ironically function to create a climate of political segregation among them. Here, I analyze an instance of the state’s segregationist approach to redress movements by problematizing the dichotomous construction of the “Aboriginal”/“non-Aboriginal” categories in its 1998 apology to Indigenous peoples. Drawing upon “epistemologies of ignorance,” I suggest that these kinds of segregation serve to put constraints on alliance- building potentials across different Indigenous self-determination and other ethnocultural anti-racist movements. Finally, using Day’s account of the triangular logic of settler
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Transgender Men Around
    The Author(s) BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2017, 17(Suppl 2):332 DOI 10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5 RESEARCH Open Access From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers Alexis Hoffkling1*, Juno Obedin-Maliver2,3 and Jae Sevelius4 Abstract Background: Some transgender men retain their uterus, get pregnant, and give birth. However, societal attitudes about gender have erected barriers to openly being pregnant and giving birth as a transgender man. Little research exists regarding transgender men’s reproductive needs. Anecdotal observations suggest that social change and increasing empowerment of transgender men may result in increasing frequency and openness about pregnancy and birth. Specific needs around conception, pregnancy, and newborn care may arise from transphobia, exogenous testosterone exposure, or from having had (or desiring) gender-affirming surgery. We undertook a qualitative study to understand the needs of transgender men who had given birth. Methods: We interviewed 10 transgender men who had been recruited for a recently published online cross-sectional survey of individuals (n = 41). Subjects had given birth while identifying as male. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded. Analysis used a priori and emergent codes to identify central themes and develop a framework for understanding participant experiences. Results: Participants reported diverse experiences and values on issues including prioritization and sequencing of transition versus reproduction, empowerment in healthcare, desire for external affirmation of their gender and/or pregnancy, access to social supports, and degree of outness as male, transgender, or pregnant. We identified structural barriers that disempowered participants and describe healthcare components that felt safe and empowering.
    [Show full text]
  • 16-183A Policy
    ReportNo: 16-183a Meeting Date October 26, 2016 Alameda-ContraCosta Transit District STAFF RE PO RT TO: AC Transit Board of Directors FROM: Michael A. Hursh, General Manager SUBJECT: Board Policy 213 -- Prohibiting AlIForms of Unlawful Employment Discrimination Including Sexualand Other Forms of Harassment ACTIONITEM RE£OMMENDEOACTION($] ; Consider adopting revisions to Board Policy 213 Prohibiting All Forms of Unlawful Employment Discrimination Including Sexualand Other Forms of Harassment. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE The State of California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH)updated many of its regulations last year. As a result, the District has updated its training and proposes revisions to Board Policy 213 and Administrative Regulation 213A in compliancewith the new regulations. In compliance with California Government Code $ 12940 (a), the protected categories have been expanded to conform to recent court decisions. Specifically,unlawful employment practiceson the basis of mental disability, physical disability, gender expression,gender identity, gender non-conforming or variance, sex, transgender, pregnancy, religious creed, national-origin and anti-bulling. This proposed policy is meant to comply with state law and foster a workplace environment of inclusion, civility, dignity, respect and professionalism. BUDGETARY/FISCALIMPACT There is no budgetary or fiscalimpact associated with this report ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES Maintain compliance with current state and federallaws regarding employment discrimination ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Staff found no practical alternatives to the course of action recommended in this report 1 of 13 Report No. ].6-183a Page2 of 2 PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION/POLICIES Policy No. 207 -- Equal Employment Opportunities and Affirmative Action, adopted 9/28/90 Po[icy No. 201 - Anti-Bu]]ying and Prevention of Abusive Conduct, adopted 6/10/].5 Policy No.
    [Show full text]
  • PJHR Grant Proposal – Philosophia Annual Conference2017
    PJHR Grant Proposal – philoSOPHIA Annual Conference2017 1. Workshop/Symposium APPLICATION FORM: Dr. Lauren Guilmette 561-297-4653 / [email protected] Assistant Professor of Philosophy (pre-tenure) in Philosophy philoSOPHIA: Society for Continental Feminism, Annual Conference 2017 As I elaborate below, this international conference will bring leading scholars from interdisciplinary fields—especially feminist philosophers, feminist theorists, queer theorists, disability scholars, bioethicists, critical race theorists, postcolonial theorists, and social justice advocates—to our Boca Raton campus on 3/30, 3/31 and 4/1/2017, with all events free to FAU students, faculty, and staff. Along with internal FAU participation, over 80 participants will by flying in for this event on our campus, with too many names and institutions to name here; the full list is included in the conference program I have appended below, but highlights include: • Keynote Speaker: Sara Ahmed, independent feminist scholar and writer • Teresa Brennan Memorial Panel, featuring Jane Caputi (FAU), Kyoo Lee (City University of New York), and another invite TBD • Social Justice Plenary Panel, featuring Shelley Tremain (independent scholar and coordinator of Dialogues on Disability), Devonya Havis (Canisius College), and Myisha Cherry (U. of Illinois-Chicago, currently a fellow at Harvard) • Queer Theory and Ethics: Rethinking Vulnerability—panel featuring Jana Sawicki (Williams), Falguni Sheth (Emory), and Dianna Taylor (John Carroll U.), moderated by Lynne Huffer (Emory), followed by a workshop for student work (led by the panelists) • Active Intolerance Roundtable, an offshoot of the Prison and Theory Working Group, on theories of mass incarceration and justice, featuring Natalie Cisneros (Seattle U.), Stephen Dillon (Hampshire), Andrew Dilts (Loyola Marymount U.), Andrea Pitts (UNC- Charlotte), Falguni Sheth (Emory), and Perry Zurn (U.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Reports/Reports/Ntds Full.Pdf
    NON-BINARY AND TRANSMASCULINE REPRODUCTION: STORIES OF CONCEPTION, PREGNANCY, AND BIRTH by Olivia Fischer B.Kin., The University of British Columbia, 2016 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Counselling Psychology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2020 © Olivia Fischer, 2020 ii The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, a thesis/dissertation entitled: Non-binary and Transmasculine Reproduction: Stories of Conception, Pregnancy, and Birth submitted by Olivia Fischer in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Counselling Psychology Examining Committee: Dr. Judith Daniluk, Professor, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, UBC Supervisor Dr. Anita Hubley, Professor, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, UBC Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Chris Shelley, Clinical Director, The Adler Centre Supervisory Committee Member iii Abstract The question that guided this inquiry was: how do non-binary and transmasculine people narrate their stories of conception, pregnancy, and birth? A qualitative, narrative approach was determined to be most appropriate for answering this question. Five non-binary individuals volunteered to participate in this study. Data were collected using largely unstructured, in-depth, tape-recorded interviews. Analysis of the verbatim transcripts and tape recordings yielded a chronological, cohesive narrative for each participant. Four participants reviewed their narrative and confirmed that their story was accurately represented. The individual narratives were then woven into one collective narrative and common themes across the participants’ stories were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Refractions of Reality Refractions of Reality Philosophy and the Moving Image
    Refractions of Reality Refractions of Reality Philosophy and the Moving Image John Mullarkey University of Dundee © John Mullarkey 2009 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2009 978-0-230-00247-0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2009 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin's Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-28065-0 ISBN 978-0-230-58231-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230582316 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy in Contemporary Time: Relevance Vs. Public Perception
    Mgbakoigba, Journal of African Studies. Vol.6 No.1. July 2016 PHILOSOPHY IN CONTEMPORARY TIME: RELEVANCE VS. PUBLIC PERCEPTION C.O. Abakare & V.C. Okeke Abstract What is the relevance of philosophy in this contemporary time? Philosophy is viewed by many people as an irrelevant discipline- one of no social and/or practical significance. It is sometimes seen also as an abstract and drab enterprise fit only for the intellectuals. Overtime also, philosophy has come to be perceived as having enjoyed its relevance in the past and no longer has any relevance in this era of “science and technology”. However, certain questions arise: Given this perception, is philosophy actually of any relevance to the contemporary society? In practical terms, what are the roles of philosophy to society? Using the traditional philosophical method of analysis and exposition, this paper finds that philosophy plays and continues to play a vital role in contemporary society. The paper submits that philosophy is essential for an all- encompassing human development. As philosophy trains the human mind to reason correctly and rationally, the paper recommends a little bit of philosophy for all in the different levels of the educational sector. This proper training of the human mind with the tool of philosophy translates to human cum societal enhancement. Keywords: Philosophy, Contemporary, Reason, Public Perception, Societal Development Introduction Philosophy, as an area of study is nowadays attracting a lot of lack of patronage for the singular reason that it does not put “food on the table nor does it build bridges”. This is a manner of describing the common place opinion that philosophy is an abstract “speculative reasoning or exercise about cosmos or reality and thus has no direct relevance or contribution to make in practical issues of human existence”1.
    [Show full text]
  • Publikationsliste Für Homepage
    Christian Schäfer Publikationen: Monographien: 1. - Xenophanes von Kolophon. Ein Vorsokratiker zwischen Mythos und Philosophie. (Teubner, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 77) Stuttgart/Leipzig 1996. 2. - Unde malum? Die Frage nach dem Woher des Bösen bei Plotin, Augustinus und Dionysius vom Areopag. (Königshausen & Neumann) Würzburg 2002. 3. - The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. An Introduction to the Structure and the Content of the Treatise On Divine Names. (Brill, Philosophia Antiqua 99) Leiden/Boston/Köln 2006. 4. - Thomas von Aquins gründlichere Behandlung der Übel. Eine Auswahlinterpretation der Schrift De malo. (Akademie-Verlag, Veröffentlichungen des Grabmann-Instituts 57) Berlin 2013. Herausgebertätigkeit: 1. - Platon als Mythologe. Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen, hgg. von M. Janka und Chr. Schäfer. (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) Darmstadt 2002. [Zweite, erweiterte Auflage als Platon als Mythologe. Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen. Darmstadt 2014.] 2. - Mittelalterliches Denken: Debatten, Ideen und Gestalten im Kontext, hgg. von Chr. Schäfer und M. Thurner. (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) Darmstadt 2007. 3. - Platon-Lexikon. Ein Begriffswörterbuch zu Platon und der platonischen Tradition, hgg. von Chr. Schäfer. (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) Darmstadt 2007, 22013. [Portugiesische Übersetzung São Paulo 2012.] 4. - Julian Apostata und die philosophische Reaktion gegen das Christentum, hgg. von Chr. Schäfer. (de Gruyter, Millennium-Studien 21) Berlin/New York 2008. 5. - Passiones animae. Die Leidenschaften der Seele in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie, hgg. von Chr. Schäfer und M. Thurner. (Akademie Verlag, Veröffentlichungen des Grabmann-Instituts 52) Berlin 2009. [Zweite, erweiterte Auflage als Passiones animae. Die Leidenschaften der Seele in der mittelalterlichen Theologie und Philosophie. Ein Handbuch. Berlin 2013.] 6. - Memoria – Intellectus – Voluntas. Festschrift für Erwin Schadel, hgg. von Chr.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy Through Film: the Matrix (1999)
    Philosophy through Film: The Matrix (1999) What is REAL and how do we KNOW? Philosophy is about asking questions, and understanding how people have tried to answer very broad questions. An Introduction to METAPHYSICS and EPISTEMOLOGY In The Matrix (Andy and Larry Wachowski, 1999) Keanu Reeves plays a computer programmer who leads a double life as a hacker called Neo. After receiving cryptic messages on his computer monitor, Neo begins to search for Morpheus (Laurence Fishburn), the leader of a resistance group, who he believes is responsible for the messages. Eventually, Neo finds Morpheus, and is then told that reality is actually very different from what he perceives it to be. Morpheus tells Neo that human existence is merely an illusion. In reality, humans are being ‘farmed’ as a source of energy by a race of sentient, malevolent machines. People actually live their entire lives in pods, with their brains being fed sensory stimuli which give them the illusion of leading ‘ordinary’ lives. Morpheus explains that, up until then, the ‘reality’ perceived by Neo is actually ‘a computer‐generated dream world…a neural interactive simulation’ called The Matrix. Watch the clips from The Matrix and think about the following three questions: What is REAL? What can we KNOW? If this film is meant to teach us something about life, what is its message? Read the quotations and answer the questions in the space provided. 1) What is ‘real’ for Neo? Is he right? “What is real? How do you define ‘real’? If you’re talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then ‘real’ is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain”.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Sonoma Equal Employment Opportunity Policy and Complaint
    COUNTY OF SONOMA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY & COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Approved: Board of Supervisors Authority: Human Resources/County Administrator Revised Date: September 2016 SECTION I. PURPOSE A. To achieve equality of employment opportunities for all qualified persons without regard to race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, belief or grooming, sex (including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, transgender, pregnancy, childbirth, medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breast feeding), marital status, age, medical condition, physical or mental disability, genetic information, military or veteran status, or any other legally protected category, in accordance with federal and state laws and County ordinances. B. To remove any artificial, arbitrary or unnecessary barriers to employment which operate to discriminate on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, belief or grooming, sex (including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, transgender, pregnancy, childbirth, medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breast feeding), marital status, age, medical condition, physical or mental disability, genetic information, military or veteran status, or any other legally protected category. C. To increase employment opportunities of all qualified persons by eliminating non job- related factors, conditions and requirements from all position specifications. D. To evaluate the County of Sonoma's (“the County of Sonoma” or “the County”) personnel activities so as to enable the County to take action, where appropriate, so as to achieve full utilization of persons in historically disadvantaged groups, where any deficiencies exist. E. To provide a timely, fair, thorough and impartial internal complaint system to resolve allegations of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against the County of Sonoma or involving its employees, officers or affected third parties in violation of this policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philqsophy of Nature of Kant, Schelling and Hegel
    Citation: Dieter Wandschneider (2010) The Philosophy of Nature of Kant, Schelling and Hegel, in: Moyar, Dean (ed. 2010) The Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century Phi-iosophy. London, New York: Routledge 2010, 64—‘l03 3 THE PHILQSOPHY OF NATURE OF KANT, SCHELLING AND HEGEL UFE‘' (“Fm -z =sSb:3Sl.C/J Q;r-Q3SE.SD...cs -a Translated by Patrick Leland Introduction Man, though himself a child of nature, is — in Herder’s words — a freed man of nature. Through reason he is able to disentangle himself from natural compulsions and adapt nature to his needs. Admittedly, that also means his relation to nature is not thoroughly determined by nature but rather is precariously open. Reason is thus continuously required to clarify and justify anew man’s relation to nature. In other words, it is constitutive of man that he has a concept of nature and hence also a fundamental need for a philosophy of nature. It is no accident that in the Ionian world the philosophy of nature was “the form in which philosophy as such was born” (Wahsner ZOOZ: 9). In this respect, it is surprising that the present age, which more than any previous era is determined by the results and applications of scientific research, has not developed a thoroughgoing philosophy of nature. Instead, it is the philosophy of science, or philo- sophical reflection on the foundations of natural science, which — prepared already in the second half of the nineteenth century — has attained a truly epochal status during the twentieth century and continues to dominate contemporary philosophy. As the latter has allowed the philosophy ofscience to supersede the philosophy ofnature, it has neglected to develop a concept of nature adequate for our time.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Reflections on the Hypatia Controversy: Philosophical Methods and Social Justice
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 3:25 p.m. Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice Études critiques sur le genre, la culture, et la justice Editorial Reflections on the Hypatia Controversy: Philosophical Methods and Social Justice Alison Suen and Chloë Taylor Volume 39, Number 2, 2018 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1064072ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1064072ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Mount Saint Vincent University ISSN 1715-0698 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this document Suen, A. & Taylor, C. (2018). Editorial: Reflections on the Hypatia Controversy: Philosophical Methods and Social Justice. Atlantis, 39(2), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1064072ar All Rights Reserved © Mount Saint Vincent University, 2018 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Special Section: Editorial Reflections on the Hypatia Controversy: Philosophical Methods and Social Justice Alison Suen is an assistant professor of philosophy at his cluster of articles proceeds from a symposium Iona College, New York. She received her BA in Tfunded by both the Social Sciences and Human- Philosophy from the University of Northern Iowa in ities Research Council of Canada and Kule Institute 2006, and her PhD in Philosophy from Vanderbilt for Advanced Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Law Reporter
    Medical law reporter Editor: Thomas Faunce* WHAT MAKES A REAL MAN? GENDER NORMS AND WESTERN AUSTRALIA v AH [2010] WASCA 172 In Western Australia v AH [2010] WASCA 172 the Western Australian Court of Appeal denied two female-to-male applicants for gender reassignment certificates the right to be legally recognised as men. In so doing, an opportunity was lost for Australia to be one of the first jurisdictions in the world to legally provide a reassignment of gender without requiring permanent sterilising surgery. This column examines not only the legal issues considered in the case but the broader ethical and human rights issues associated with denying female-to-male gender reassignment applicants who have not undergone a permanent sterilisation or genitalia alteration procedure, the right to be identified as males. INTRODUCTION In Western Australia v AH [2010] WASCA 172 an appeal was brought against a decision of the Western Australian Supreme Court following an appeal from a decision of the State Administrative Tribunal (the tribunal) which had overturned an earlier decision made by the Gender Reassignment Board of Western Australia (the board).1 Two applicants, AB and AH, were both registered as females at the time of their birth. After reaching majority, each applied under s 14(1) of the Gender Reassignment Act 2000 (WA) (the Act) for issue of a recognition certificate recognising their gender reassignment from female to male after each underwent testosterone treatment and a bilateral mastectomy. Neither had undergone a hysterectomy or phalloplasty. The board found that the applicants had satisfied all the criteria required by the Act to be eligible for the certificate except for the requirement that they have the “gender characteristics” of a male.
    [Show full text]