sign in sign up
<<
Home , Kantian Review, Kant Yearbook, PhiloSOPHIA, The Leibniz Review, The Monist

KANT BIBLIOGRAPHY

The literature on Kant is very large and con- edition (see further the List of Abbreviations stantly growing so it is necessarily the case in this volume). that this bibliography is selective but the selection is aimed at providing for the reader reference to the major recent works on each aspect of Kant’s , at least with 2. English Translations regard to English-language contributions. Only very selective attention has been paid The Cambridge Edition of Kant’s work, which to work in other languages with the result has been appearing since 1992, edited by Paul that the overwhelming focus is on works in Guyer and Allen Wood, has gained authority English. However, this bibliography is rare in as the source for many of Kant’s works and presenting works on each of the major ele- includes translations of lectures and notes ments of the Critical division of Kant’s works that were, until very recently, not available in addition to incorporating wide material at all in English. The edition of the Critique on the background, context and influence of of Pure Reason, published in 1998, has not, the Critical philosophy. – GB however, decisively replaced the long-classic translation by Norman Kemp Smith (1929) (published by Palgrave Macmillan). The 2007 edition of Kemp Smith also includes an 1. Kant’s Works in German extensive bibliography of English-language work on the Critique but does not entirely The standard critical edition of Kant’s works, overlap with this one as it is more focused which provides the pagination for all vol- than this. Alongside these two translations umes cited in this Companion other than the of the Critique an important third one, by Critique of Pure Reason is Kant’s gesammelte Werner Pluhar, has also appeared (1996). Schriften, edited by the Königlich Preußische Hackett, the publishers of Pluhar’s edition Akademie der Wissenschaften, subsequently of the Critique of Pure Reason, have further Deutsche and then Berlin-Brandenburg published translations by him of the Critique Akademie der Wissenschaften and which is of Judgment and the Critique of Practical generally simply referred to as the Akademie Reason. Hackett and Cambridge University

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Press thus offer competing translations of the Reason’ (Oxford: Oxford University central Critical works. Press, 2005). Scruton, R., Kant: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001). 3. Biographies of Kant Uleman, J. K., An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cassirer, E., Kant’s Life and (New Cambridge University Press, 2010). Haven: Yale University Press, 1981 Walker, R. C. S., Kant (London: Routledge [1918]). & Kegan Paul, 1978). Gulyga, A., : His Life and Wenzel, C. H., An Introduction to Kant’s Thought (Boston: Birkhauser, 1987). (Oxford/New York: Wiley- Kuehn, M., Kant: A Biography (Cambridge: Blackwell, 2005). Cambridge University Press, 2001). Wilkerson, T. E., Kant’s Critique of Pure Stuckenberg, J. W. H., The Life of Immanuel Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976). Kant (Lanham, MD/London: University Wood, A. W., Kant (Oxford/New York: Press of America, 1986 [1882]). Wiley-Blackwell, 2005).

4. Introductions to Kant 5. Edited Collections on Kant

Broad, C. D., Kant: An Introduction Anderson-Gold, S. & Muchnik, P. (eds), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Kant’s Anatomy of Evil (Cambridge: 1978). Cambridge University Press, 2009). Buroker, J. V., Kant’s Critique of Pure Beck, L. W. (ed.), Kant Studies Today Reason: An Introduction (Cambridge: (Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1967). Cambridge University Press, 2006). ––––– (ed.), Kant’s Theory of Knowledge Dicker, G., Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974). Analytical Introduction (Oxford: Oxford Beiner, R. & Booth, J. W. (eds), Kant & University Press, 2005). (New Haven: Yale Dudley, W. & Engelhard, K. (eds), Immanuel University Press, 1993). Kant: Key Concepts (Durham: Acumen, Bird, G. (ed.), A Companion to Kant 2011). (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006). Gardner, S., Kant and the Critique of Pure Bohman, J. & Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds), Reason (London/New York: Routledge, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s 1999). Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge: Guyer, P., Kant (London/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Routledge, 2006). Butts, R. E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Hartnack, J., Kant’s Theory of Knowledge Physical Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, (London/Toronto: Macmillan, 1968). 1986). Rosenberg, J., Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Chadwick, R. & Cazeaux, C. (eds), Introduction to the ‘Critique of Pure Immanuel Kant: Critical Assessments,

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

4 vols. (London/New York: Routledge, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992) 2006). Cicovacki, P. (ed.), Kant’s Legacy ––––– (ed.), The Cambridge Companion (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ 2001). (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cohen, T. & Guyer, P. (eds), Essays in 2010). Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Harper, W. A. & Meerbote, R. (eds), Kant Chicago Press, 1982). on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity Dancy, R. M. (ed.), Kant and Critique (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993). Press, 1984). Denis, L. (ed.), Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Hill, T. E. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Morals’: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Kant’s (Oxford: Blackwell, 2009). Cambridge University Press, 2010). Höffe, O. (ed.), Grundlegung der Firestone, C. & Palmquist, S. (eds), Kant Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein kooperativer and the New Philosophy of Religion Kommentar (Frankfurt a/M: Vittorio (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Klostermann, 1989). Press, 2006). Jacobs, B. & Kain, P. (eds), Essays on Kant’s Förster, E. (ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge Deductions (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003). University Press, 1989). Kennington, R. (ed.), The Philosophy Goudeli, K., Kontos, P. & Patellis, I. of Immanuel Kant (Washington, DC: (eds), Kant: Making Reason Intuitive Catholic University Press, 1985). (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Kitcher, P. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Macmillan, 2007). Reason (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Gram, M. S. (ed.), Kant: Disputed Littefield, 1998). Questions (Chicago: Quadrangle Kneller, J. & Axinn, S. (eds), Autonomy and Books, 1967; second expanded edition, Community: Readings in Contemporary Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing, Kantian Social Philosophy (Albany, NY: 1984). SUNY Press, 1998). ––––– (ed.), Interpreting Kant (Iowa City: Massimi, M. (ed.), Kant and Philosophy of University of Iowa Press, 1982). Science Today (Cambridge: Cambridge Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion University Press, 2008). to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge Mohanty, J. N. & Shahan, R. W. (eds), University Press, 1992). Essays on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason ––––– (ed.), Kant’s Groundwork of the (Norman: University of Oaklahoma Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays Press, 1982). (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Ouden, B. & Moen, M. (eds), New Essays 1998). on Kant (New York: Peter Lang, 1987). ––––– (ed.), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Parret, H. (ed.), Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant (Berlin/ Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1998). ––––– (ed.), The Cambridge Companion Penelhum, T. & MacIntosh, J. J. (eds), The to Kant and Modern Philosophy First Critique: Reflections on Kant’s

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Critique of Pure Reason (Belmont: 6. Context and Reception of Wadsworth, 1969). Kant’s Work Posy, C. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992). Allison, H. E., Lessing and the Reath, A. & Timmermann, J. (eds), Kant’s Enlightenment (Ann Arbor, MI: Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical University of Michigan Press, 1966). Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University –––––, The Kant-Eberhard Controversy Press, 2010). (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Rehberg, A. & Jones, R. (eds), The Matter of Press, 1973). Critique: Readings in Kant’s Philosophy –––––, ‘Kant’s critique of Spinoza’, in R. (Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2000). Kennington (ed.), The Philosophy of Rothfield, P. (ed.). Kant after Derrida Spinoza (Washington, DC: Catholic (Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2003). University of America Press, 1980), Schott, R. M. (ed.). Feminist Interpretations pp. 199–227. of Immanuel Kant (University Park: Penn Altmann, A., Moses Mendelssohn: A State University Press, 1997). Biographical Study (London: Routledge Schulting, D. & Verburgt, J. (eds), Kant’s & Kegan Paul, 1973). Idealism: New Interpretations of a Al-Azm, S., The Origins of Kant’s Controversial Doctrine (Dordrecht: Arguments in the Antinomies (Oxford: Springer Science, 2011). Oxford University Press, 1972). Timmermann, J. (ed.), Kant’s Groundwork Ameriks, K., Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: of the Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Problems in the Appropriation of Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University the Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Press, 2009). Cambridge University Press, 2000). Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of –––––, Kant and the Historical Turn: Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation Clarendon Press, 2002). (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006). Walker, R. C. S. (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason Anderson, R. L., ‘The Wolffian paradigm (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982). and its discontent: Kant’s containment Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant and the Sciences definition of analyticity in historical (Oxford: Oxford University Press, context’, Archiv für Geschichte der 2001). Philosophie 87 (2005): 22–74. Williams, H. (ed.), Essays on Kant’s Political Banham, G. ‘Kant and German Idealisms’, Philosophy (Chicago: University of British Journal for the History of Chicago Press, 1992). Philosophy 11,2 (2003): 323–330. Wolff, R. P. (ed.), Kant: A Collection of –––––, ‘Freedom and transcendental Critical Essays (Garden City: Doubleday idealism’, British Journal for the History Anchor, 1967). of Philosophy 14,4 (2006): 787–799. Wood, A. W. (ed.), Self and Nature in –––––, ‘The continental tradition: Kant, Kant’s Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Hegel, Nietzsche’, in J. Mullarkey & B. University Press, 1984). Lord (eds), The Continuum Companion Yovel, Y. (ed.), Kant’s Practical Philosophy to (London: Reconsidered (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989). Continuum, 2009).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Scepticism, causation and cognition’, Chignell, A. (ed.), ‘On going back to Kant’, British Journal for the History of special issue on neo-Kantianism, The Philosophy 18,3 (2010): 507–520. Philosophical Forum 39, 2 (2008): Barnouw, J., ‘The philosophical achievement 109–298. and historical significance of Johann Dahlstrom, D., ‘The Critique of Pure Reason Nikolaus Tetens’, Studies in Eighteenth and continental philosophy: Heidegger’s Century Culture 9 (1979): 301–335. interpretation of transcendental Baumgarten, H.-U., Kant und Tetens imagination’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1992). pp. 380–400. Beck, L. W., Early German Philosophy: Kant Darwall, S., ‘Sympathetic liberalism: and His Predecessors (Cambridge, MA: recent work on Adam Smith’, Harvard University Press, 1969). Philosophy and Public Affairs 28,2 Beiser, F., The Fate of Reason: German (1999): 139–164. Philosophy From Kant to Fichte Davies, M. L., Marcus Herz and the End of (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University the Enlightenment (Detroit: Wayne State Press, 1987). University Press, 1995). –––––, German Idealism: The Struggle De Jong, W. R., ‘Kant’s analytic judgments Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801 and the traditional theory of concepts’, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Journal of the History of Philosophy 33,4 Press, 2002). (1995): 613–641. Bristow, W., Hegel and the Transformation Di Giovanni, G., ‘Kant’s metaphysics of Philosophical Critique (Oxford: of nature and Schelling’s Ideas for Oxford University Press, 2007). a Philosophy of Nature’, Journal of Bubner, R., ‘Platon der Vater aller the History of Philosophy 17 (1979): Schwärmerei’, in Antike Themen und ihre 197–215. moderne Verwandlung (Frankfurt a/M, –––––, ‘The first twenty years of critique: Suhrkamp, 1992), pp. 80–93. the Spinoza connection’, in P. Guyer (ed.) Buroker, J. V., Space and Incongruence: The (1992), pp. 417–448. Origin of Kant’s Idealism (Dordrecht: D. –––––, ‘Hume, Jacobi, and common sense: Reidel, 1981). an episode in the reception of Hume Butts, R. E., ‘The grammar of reason: at the time of Kant’, Kant-Studien 88 Hamann’s challenge to Kant’, 75 (1997): 44–58. (1988): 251–283. –––––, ‘Faith without religion, and Carrasco, M. A., ‘Adam Smith’s religion without faith: Kant and Hegel reconstruction of practical reason’, Review on religion’, Journal of the History of of Metaphysics 58 (2004): 81–116. Philosophy 41,3 (2003): 365–383. Cavallar, G., ‘Kant’s judgment on Frederick’s –––––, Freedom and Religion in Kant and enlightened absolutism’, History of His Immediate Successors: The Vocation Political Thought 14 (1993): 103–132. of Humankind, 1774–1800 (Cambridge: Caygill, H., Art of Judgement (Oxford: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Blackwell, 1989). Dixon, R. A., ‘Johann Nicolas Tetens: –––––, A Kant Dictionary (Oxford/New a forgotten father of developmental York: Blackwell, 1995). psychology?’, International Journal of

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Behavioral Development 13 (1990): Frank, M., ‘Unendliche Annäherung’: Die 215–230. Anfänge der philosophen Frühromantik Dunham, W., Euler: The Master of Us (Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 1997). All (Washington: The Mathematical Franks, P. W., All or Nothing: Systematicity, Association of America, 1999). Transcendental Arguments and Düsing, K., ‘Kant und Epikur. Skepticism in German Idealism Untersuchungen zum Problem der (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Grundlegung einer Ethik’, in Allgemeine Press, 2005). Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1/2 (1976): Friedman, M. & Nordmann, A. (eds), The 39–58. Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century –––––, ‘Constitution and structure of self- Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, identity: Kant’s theory of apperception 2006). and Hegel’s criticism’, Midwest Studies Fulda, H. F. & Stolzenberg, J. (eds), System in Philosophy 8 (1983): 409–431. der Vernunft. Kant und der deutsche –––––, ‘The reception of Kant’s doctrine Idealismus, Bd. 1, Architektonik und of postulates in Schelling’s and Hegel’s System in der Philosophie Kants early philosophical projects’, in (Hamburg: Meiner, 2001). M. Baur & D. Dahlstrom (eds), The Glock, H.-J. (ed.), Strawson and Kant Emergence of German Idealism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003). (Washington, DC: Catholic Gorner, P., ‘Phenomenological University of America Press, 1999), interpretations of Kant in Husserl and pp. 201–237. Heidegger’, in G. Bird (ed.) (2006), Falkenstein, L., ‘Kant, Mendelssohn, pp. 500–512. Lambert and the subjectivity of time’, Gregor, M., ‘Baumgarten’s Aesthetica’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 Review of Metaphysics 37,2 (1985): (1991): 227–251. 357–385. –––––, ‘The great light of 1769 – a Humean Guyer, P., Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: awakening? Comments on Lothar Kant’s Response to Hume (Princeton: Kreimendahl’s account of Hume’s Princeton University Press, 2008). influence on Kant’, Archiv für Geshichte Hanna, R., Kant and the Foundations of der Philosophie 77 (1995): Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon 63–79. Press, 2001). Fleischacker, S. ‘Philosophy in moral Heinz, M. & Krijnen, C. (eds), Kant im practice: Kant and Adam Smith’, Kant- Neukantianismus: Fortschritt oder Studien 82,3 (1991): 249–269. Rückschritt? (Würzburg: Königshausen –––––, ‘Values behind the market: Kant’s & Neumann, 2007). response to the Wealth of Nations’, Henrich, D., Grundlegung aus dem Ich. History of Political Thought 17 (1996): Untersuchungen zur Vorgeschichte des 379–407. Idealismus. Tübingen – Jena 1790–1794, –––––, A Third Concept of Liberty: 2 vols. (Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 2004). Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Horstmann, R. P., Die Grenzen der Adam Smith (Princeton: Princeton Vernunft. Eine Untersuchung zu University Press, 1999). Zielen und Motiven des Deutschen

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Idealismus, third edition (Frankfurt a/M: –––––, ‘Kant in reply to Lambert on the Klostermann, 2004). ancestry of metaphysical concepts’, Höffe, O., ‘Ethik ohne und mit Metaphysik. 5 (2001): 1–48. Zum Beispiel Aristoteles und Kant’, –––––, ‘Kant on sensibility and the Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung understanding in the 1770s’, Canadian 61,4 (2007): 405–422. Journal of Philosophy 33,4 (2003): –––––, ‘The reception of the Critique of Pure 443–482. Reason in German Idealism’, in P. Guyer –––––, ‘Kant’s laboratory of ideas in the (ed.) (2010), pp. 329–345. 1770s’, in G. Bird (ed.) (2006), pp. 63–78. Klemme, H., ‘Kants Wende zum Ich’, –––––, ‘Kant’s metaphysical reflections in Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung the Duisburg Nachlass’, Kant-Studien 97 53 (1999): 509–529. (2006): 79–113. Kreimendahl, L., Kant – Der Durchbruch Lenoir, T., ‘Kant, Blumenbach, and vital von 1769 (Cologne: Dinter, 1990). materialism in German biology’, 71 Kuehn, M., ‘Kant’s conception of Hume’s (1980): 77–108. problem’, Journal of the History of Look, B., (ed.), The Continuum Companion Philosophy 21 (1983): 175–193. to Leibniz (London: Continuum, 2011). –––––, Scottish Common Sense in Germany, Lord, B., Kant and Spinozism (Basingstoke/ 1786–1800: A Contribution to the New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). History of Critical Philosophy (Kingston/ Manchester, P. ‘Kant’s conception of Montreal: McGill-Queens University architectonic in its historical context’, Press, 1987). Journal of the History of Philosophy 41,2 –––––, ‘The Wolffian background of Kant’s (2003): 187–207. transcendental deduction’, in P. A. Easton Mandt, A. J., ‘Fichte, Kant’s legacy, and the (ed.), and the Workings of the meaning of modern philosophy’, Review (Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1997). of Metaphysics 50,3 (1997): 591–633. –––––, ‘Christian Thomasius and Christian Massimi, M., ‘Kant’s dynamical theory Wolff’, in R. H. Popkin (ed.), The of matter in 1755, and its debt to Columbia History of Western Philosophy speculative Newtonian experimentalism’, (New York: Columbia University Press, in Studies in History and Philosophy of 1999), pp. 472–475. Science 42,4 (2011): 525–543 –––––, ‘Kant’s Critical philosophy and Montes, L., Adam Smith in Context its reception – the first five years (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave (1781–1786)’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), Macmillan, 2004). pp. 630–664. Nuzzo, A. ‘Kant and Herder on –––––, ‘Tetens, Johann Nicolas’, in H. Baumgarten’s Aesthetica’, Journal of Klemme & M. Kuehn (eds), The the History of Philosophy 44 (2006): Dictionary of Eigtheenth Century 577–597. German , vol. 3 (London: –––––, ‘Transformations of freedom in the Continuum, 2010), pp. 1163–1169. Jena Kant-reception, 1785–1794’, The Laywine, A., Kant’s Early Metaphysics and Owl of Minerva 32,2 (2001): 135–167. the Origins of the Critical Philosophy O’Shea, J., ‘Conceptual connections: Kant (Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1993). and the twentieth-century analytic

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

tradition’, in G. Bird (ed.) (2006), Schalow, F., The Renewal of the Heidegger- pp. 513–526. Kant Dialogue: Action, Thought, and Piper, W. B., ‘Kant’s contact with British Responsibility (Albany, NY: State empiricism’, Eighteenth-Century Studies University of New York Press, 1992). 12 (1978–1979): 174–189. Schaller, W. E., ‘From the Groundwork Pippin, R. B., Hegel’s Idealism. The to the Metaphysics of Morals: what Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness happened to morality in Kant’s theory of (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, justice?’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 1989). 12 (1995): 333–345. Pollok, K., ‘The “transcendental method”. Schlipp, P. A., Kant’s Pre-Critical Ethics, On the reception of the Critique of Pure second edition (Evanston: Northwestern Reason in neo-Kantianism’, in P. Guyer University Press, 1960). (ed.) (2010), pp. 346–379. Schmidt, J., ‘Civility, Enlightenment, and Polonoff, I., Force, Cosmos, Monads and Society’, American Political Science Other Themes of Kant’s Early Thought Review 92 (1988): 419–427. (Bonn: Bouvier, 1973). –––––, ‘The question of enlightenment: how Pozzo, R. ‘Prejudices and horizons: G. F. Kant, Mendelssohn and Immanuel Kant Meier’s Vernunftlehre and its relation answered the Berlinische Monatsschrift’, to Kant’, Journal of the History of Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 Philosophy 43 (2005): 185–202. (1992): 77–101. Radner, M., ‘Unlocking the second ––––– (ed.), What is Enlightenment? antinomy: Kant and Wolff’, Journal of Eighteenth Century Answers and the History of Philosophy 36 (1998): Twentieth Century Questions (Berkeley/ 413–441. Los Angeles: University of California Reiss, H., ‘Kant’s politics and the Press, 1996). enlightenment: reflections on some recent Schulting, D., ‘Hegel on Kant’s synthetic studies’, Political Theory 27 (1999): a priori in Glauben und Wissen’, in A. 236–273. Arndt, K. Bal & H. Ottman (eds), Hegel- Rockmore, T. (ed.), Heidegger, German Jahrbuch 2005: Glauben und Wissen. Idealism, and Neo-Kantianism (New Dritter Teil (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, York: Humanity Books, 2000). 2005), pp. 176–182. Ross, G. M. & McWalter, T. (eds), Kant and Schönfeld, M., The Philosophy of the Young His Influence (Bristol: Thoemmes, 1990). Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Sarmiento, G., ‘On Kant’s definition of the 2000). monad in the Monadologia physica of Sedgwick, S. (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s 1756’, Kant-Studien 96 (2005): 1–19. Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling and Sassen, B., ‘Critical idealism in the eyes of Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Kant’s contemporaries’, Journal of the Press, 2000). History of Philosophy 35 (1997): 421–455. Sedgwick, S., ‘Hegel’s critique of Kant: ––––– (ed.), Kant’s Early Critics: The an overview’, in G. Bird (ed.) (2006), Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical pp. 473–485. Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge –––––, Hegel’s Critique of Kant (Oxford: University Press, 2000). Oxford University Press, 2012).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Seidl, H., Sein und Bewußtsein: –––––, ‘Towards an interpretation of Kant’s Erörterungen zur Erkenntnislehre und 1768 Gegenden im Raume essay’, Kant- Metaphysik in einer Gegenüberstellung Studien 92 (2001): 407–439. von Aristoteles und Kant (Hildesheim: Ward, K., The Development of Kant’s View Olms, 2001). of Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972). Sgarbi, M., ‘The historical genesis of the Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Kantian concept of transcendental’, Reason’: Background Source Materials Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 53 (2011), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming. 2009). –––––, ‘Metaphysics in Königsberg prior to Weatherston, M., Heidegger’s Interpretation Kant (1703–1770)’, Trans/Form/Ação/ 33 of Kant: Categories, Imagination and (2010): 31–64. Temporality (London/New York: Palgrave Stan, M., ‘Kant’s early theory of motion: Macmillan, 2002). metaphysical dynamics and relativity’, Westphal, K., ‘Kant’s Critique of Pure 19 (2009): 29–61. Reason and analytic Philosophy’, in Thiel, U., ‘Between Wolff and Kant: Merian’s P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 401–430. theory of apperception’, Journal of the Wolff, R. P., ‘Kant’s debt to Hume via History of Philosophy 34 (1996): 213–232. Beattie’, Journal of the History of Ideas Tonelli, G., ‘Conditions in Königsberg and 21 (1960): 117–123. the making of Kant’s philosophy’, in A. J. Zammito, J. H. The Genesis of Kant’s Bucher et al. (eds), Bewusst-sein (Bonn: Critique of Judgment (Chicago: Bouvier, 1975). University of Chicago Press, 1992). –––––, Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ –––––, Kant, Herder and the Birth of Within the Tradition of Modern Logic Anthropology (Chicago: University of (Hildesheim: Olms, 1994). Chicago Press, 2002). Townsend, D., ‘From Shafesbury to Kant: Zoeller, G., ‘From innate to a priori: Kant’s the development of the concept of radical transformation of a Cartesian- aesthetic experience’, Journal of the Leibnizian legacy’, 72 (1989): History of Ideas 48 (1987): 287–305. 222–235. Van der Zande, J., ‘In the image of Cicero: –––––, ‘Lichtenberg and Kant on the subject German philosophy between Wolff and of thinking’, Journal of the History of Kant’, Journal of the History of Ideas 56 Philosophy 30 (1992): 222–235. (1995): 419–442. –––––, ‘The microscope of experience: Christian Garve’s translation of Cicero’s De Officiis (1783)’, Journal of the 7. Kant’s Theoretical History of Ideas 59 (1998): 75–94. Philosophy Walford, D., ‘The aims and methods of Kant’s 1768 Gegenden im Raume essay Abela, P., ‘Putnam’s internal realism and Kant’s in the light of Euler’s 1748 Réflexions empirical realism: the case for a divorce’, sur l’Espace et le Temps’, British Journal Idealistic Studies 26 (1996): 45–56. for the History of Philosophy 7,2 (1999): –––––, Kant’s Empirical Realism (Oxford: 305–322. Clarendon Press, 2002).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kantian walls and bridges: –––––, ‘Kant, non-conceptual content, and challenging the integrationist model of the representation of space’, Journal of the relation between theoretical and the History of Philosophy 47,3 (2009): practical reason’, British Journal for 383–413. the History of Philosophy 10,4 (2002): –––––, ‘Kant’s argument for transcendental 591–616. idealism in the transcendental aesthetic’, Adams, R., ‘Things in themselves’, Proceedings of the Philosophy and Phenomenological 110,1 (2010): 47–75. Research 57 (1997): 801–825. –––––, ‘Transcendental idealism and the Addis, L. C., ‘Kant’s first analogy’, Kant- transcendental deduction’, in D. Schulting Studien 54,3 (1963): 237–242. & J. Verburgt (eds) (2011), pp. 91–108. Adkins, B., ‘The satisfaction of reason: the Allison, H. E., ‘Kant’s concept of the mathematical/dynamical distinction in the transcendental object’, Kant-Studien 59 Critique of Pure Reason’, Kantian Review (1968): 165–186. 3 (1999): 64–80. –––––, ‘Transcendental idealism and Adorno, T. W., Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason descriptive metaphysics’, Kant-Studien 60 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001 [1995]). (1969): 216–233. Agarwala, B. K., ‘Constitution of subjectivity –––––, ‘Kant’s non-sequitur’, Kant-Studien of self and objectivity of nature’, Journal 62 (1971): 367–377. of Indian Council of Philosophical –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental humanism’, Research 20,4 (2003): 1–42. The Monist 55 (1971): 182–207. Al-Azm, S. J., Kant’s Theory of Time (New –––––, ‘Kant’s critique of Berkeley’, Journal York: Philosophical Library, 1967). of the History of Philosophy 11 (1973): –––––, ‘Absolute space and Kant’s first 43–63. antinomy of pure reason’, Kant-Studien –––––, ‘Transcendental affinity – Kant’s 59 (1968): 151–164. answer to Hume’, in L. W. Beck (ed.) Alexander, P., ‘Incongruent counterparts (1974), pp. 119–127. and absolute space’, Proceedings of the –––––, ‘The Critique of Pure Reason as Aristotelian Society 85 (1984/5): 1–21. transcendental phenomenology’, in Allais, L., ‘Kant’s transcendental idealism D. Ihde & R. Zaner (eds), Dialogues in and contemporary anti-realism’, Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus International Journal of Philosophical Nijhoff, 1975), pp. 136–155. Studies 11 (2003): 369–392. –––––, ‘Kant’s refutation of realism’, –––––, ‘Kant’s one world’, The British Dialectica 30 (1976): 223–253. Journal for the History of Philosophy –––––, ‘The non-spatiality of things in 12,4 (2004): 655–684. themselves for Kant’, Journal of the –––––, ‘Intrinsic Natures: a critique of History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 313–321. Langton on Kant’, Philosophy and –––––, ‘Things in themselves, noumena, and Phenomenological Research LXXIII the transcendental object’, Dialectica 32 (2006): 143–169. (1978): 41–76. –––––, ‘Kant’s idealism and the secondary –––––, ‘Transcendental schematism and quality analogy’, Journal of the History the problem of the synthetic a priori’, of Philosophy (2007): 459–484. Dialectica 35 (1981): 57–83.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Practical and transcendental freedom Phenomenological Research 66 (2003): in the Critique of Pure Reason’, Kant- 196–202. Studien 73,3 (1982): 271–290. –––––, ‘The critique of metaphysics: the –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: structure and fate of Kant’s dialectic’, in An Interpretation and Defense (New P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 269–302. Haven: Yale University Press, Anderson, A., ‘On the practical foundations 1983). of Kant’s response to epistemic skepticism’, –––––, ‘Incongruence and ideality’, Topoi 3 Kant-Studien 89 (1998): 145–166. (1984): 169–175. Anderson, D., ‘The neglected analogy’, –––––, ‘Causality and causal laws in Kant: a The Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 critique of Michael Friedman’, in Allison (1983): 481–488. (1996), pp. 80–91. Anderson, E., ‘Kant, natural kind terms, –––––, Idealism and Freedom: Essays and scientific essentialism’, History on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (1994): Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge 355–373. University Press, 1996). Anderson, J. C., ‘Kant’s paralogism of –––––, ‘Where have all the categories gone? personhood’, Grazer Philosophische Reflections on Longuenesse’s reading Studien 10 (1980): 73–86. of Kant’s transcendental deduction’, Anderson, R. L., ‘Synthesis, cognitive Inquiry 43,1 (2000): 67–80. normativity and the meaning of –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Kant’s question, “How are synthetic Interpretation and Defense, Revised and cognitions a priori possible?”’, Expanded Edition (New Haven: Yale European Journal of Philosophy 9,3 University Press, 2004). (2001): 273–305. –––––, ‘Transcendental realism, empirical –––––, ‘It adds up after all: Kant’s realism, and transcendental idealism’, philosophy of arithmetic in the light of Kantian Review 11 (2006): 1–27. the traditional logic’, Philosophy and Ameriks, K., ‘Kant’s transcendental Phenomenological Research LXIX,3 deduction as a regressive argument’, (2004): 501–540. Kant-Studien 69 (1978): 273–287. Aquila, R., ‘Kant’s theory of concepts’, –––––, ‘Kant and Guyer on apperception’, Kant-Studien 65 (1974): 1–19. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 –––––, ‘Kant’s Phenomenalism’, Idealistic (1983): 174–186. Studies 5 (1975): 108–126. –––––, ‘From Kant to Frank: the –––––, ‘Two kinds of transcendental ineliminable subject’, in K. Ameriks & arguments in Kant’, Kant-Studien 67 D. Sturma (eds), The Modern Subject (1976): 1–19. (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995). –––––, ‘The relationship between pure and –––––, Kant’s Theory of Mind: An empirical intuition in Kant’, Kant-Studien of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, new 68 (1977): 275–289. edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, –––––, ‘Things in themselves and 2000 [1982]). appearances: intentionality and reality –––––, ‘Problems from Van Cleve’s Kant: in Kant’, Archiv für Geschichte der Experience and Objects’, Philosophy and Philosophie 61 (1979): 293–308.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Personal identity and Kant’s –––––, ‘Causality and things in themselves’, refutation of idealism’, Kant-Studien 70 Synthese 77 (1988): 353–373. (1979): 259–278. Baldwin, T. ‘Kantian modality’, Proceedings –––––, ‘Intentional objects and Kantian of the Aristotelian Society 76 appearances’, Philosophical Topics 12 (supplement) (2002): 1–24. (1981): 9–38. Banham, G. ‘Apocalyptic imagination’, in –––––, Representational Mind: A Study in P. Rothfield (ed.) (2003), pp. 66–79. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge (Bloomington: –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Imagination Indiana University Press, 1983). (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave –––––, Matter in Mind: A Study of Kant’s Macmillan, 2006). Transcendental Deduction (Bloomington: –––––, ‘The status of the principles of the Indiana University Press, 1989). Analogies’, Kantian Review 16,2 (2011): –––––, ‘Imagination as a “medium” in the 201–210. Critique of Pure Reason’, Monist 72 –––––, ‘Transcendental idealism and (1989): 209–221. transcendental apperception’, in D. –––––, ‘Unity of apperception and the Schulting & J. Verburgt (eds) (2011): division in the transcendental analytic’, pp. 109–126. Kantian Review 1 (1998): 17–52. Bannerjee, N. K., Kant’s Philosophy of the Self –––––, ‘Hans Vaihinger and some recent (New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann, 1974). intentionalist readings of Kant’, Journal Bardon, A., ‘Temporal passage and Kant’s of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): second analogy’, Ratio 15 (2002): 231–250. 134–153. –––––, ‘The singularity and the unity of –––––, ‘Kant’s empiricism in his refutation transcendental consciousness in Kant’, of idealism’, Kantian Review 8 (2004): History of European Ideas 30 (2004): 62–88. 349–376. –––––, ‘Kant and the conventionality of Aschenbrenner, K. A., Companion to Kant’s simultaneity’, British Journal for the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’: Transcendental History of Philosophy 18,5 (2010): Aesthetic and Analytic (New York/ 845–856. London: Lanham, 1983). Barker, M., ‘The proof-structure of Kant’s Baiasu, S., ‘Space, time, and mind- A-deduction’, Kant-Studien 11,2 (2001): dependence’, Kantian Review 16,2 259–282. (2011): 175–190. Barker, S., ‘Appearing and appearances in Baiasu, S. & Grier, M. ‘Revolutionary versus Kant’, Monist 51 (1967): 426–441. traditionalist approaches to Kant: some Bauer, N., ‘Kant’s subjective deduction’, aspects of the debate’, Kantian Review British Journal for the History of 16,2 (2011): 161–173. Philosophy 18,3 (2010): 433–460. Baldacchino, L., ‘Kant’s theory of self- Baum, M., ‘The B-deduction and the consciousness’, Kant-Studien 71,4 (1980): refutation of idealism’, Southern Journal 393–405. of Philosophy 25 (supplement) (1986): Baldner, K., ‘Is transcendental idealism 89–106. coherent?’, Synthese 85,1 (1990): Bayne, S. M., ‘Objects of representation and 1–23. Kant’s second analogy’, Journal of the

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

History of Philosophy XXXII, 3 (1994): –––––, ‘Strawson on Kant’, The 381–410. Philosophical Review 77,3 (1968): –––––, ‘Kant’s answer to Hume’, British 340–349. Journal for the History of Philosophy 8,2 –––––, Kant’s Dialectic (Cambridge: (2000): 207–224. Cambridge University Press, 1974). –––––, Kant on Causation: On the Fivefold Bermudez, J. L., ‘The unity of apperception Routes to the Principle of Causation in the Critique of Pure Reason’, (Albany, NY: State University of New European Journal of Philosophy 2 York Press, 2004). (1994): 213–239. Beck, L. W., ‘Kant’s theory of definition’, –––––, ‘Scepticism and the justification 65,2 (1956): of transcendental idealism’, Ratio 8,1 179–191. (1995): 1–23. –––––, ‘The second analogy and the Bernstein, J., ‘Imagination and lunacy in principle of indeterminacy’, Kant-Studien Kant’s First Critique and Anthropology’, 57 (1966): 199–205. Idealistic Studies 27 (1998): 143–154. –––––, Essays on Kant and Hume (New Bird, G., Kant’s Theory of Knowledge Haven: Yale University Press, 1978). (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962). –––––, ‘Kant on the uniformity of nature’, –––––, ‘Some recent interpretations of Kant’s Synthese 47 (1981): 449–464. transcendental deduction’, Kant-Studien Beets, M., The Shape of Reality: An 65 (1974): 1–14. Approach to Kant’s Analogies (Delft: –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental idealism’, in Eburon, 1986). G. Vesey (ed.), Idealism: Past and Present Bell, D., ‘Some Kantian on (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, propositional unity’, Aristotelian Society 1982), pp. 71–92. Supplementary Volume LXXV (2001): –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental arguments’, in 1–16. E. Schaper & W. Vossenkuhl (eds) (1989), Bencivenga, E. ‘Identity, appearances, and pp. 21–39. things in themselves’, Dialogue 23,3 –––––, ‘McDowell’s Kant’, Philosophy 71 (1984): 421–437. (1996): 219–243. –––––, ‘Knowledge as a relation and –––––, ‘Kantian myths’, Proceedings of the knowledge as an experience in the Critique Aristotelian Society 71 (1996): 245–251. of Pure Reason’, Canadian Journal of –––––, ‘Editorial review: Kant and Philosophy 15,4 (1985): 592–615. contemporary epistemology’, Kantian –––––, ‘Understanding and reason in the Review 1 (1997): 1–16. First Critique’, History of Philosophy –––––, ‘Kantian themes in contemporary Quarterly 3 (1986): 195–205. philosophy II’, Proceedings of the –––––, Kant’s Copernican Revolution (New Aristotelian Society 72 (supplement) York: Oxford University Press, 1987). (1998): 131–151. –––––, ‘Kant is on my side: a reply to –––––, ‘The trouble with Kant’, Philosophy Walker’, Philosophical Inquiry 13,3–4 74 (1999): 587–594. (1991): 62–69. –––––, ‘The paralogisms and Kant’s account Bennett, J., Kant’s Analytic (Cambridge: of psychology’, Kant-Studien 91 (2000): Cambridge University Press, 1966). 129–145.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, The Revolutionary Kant: A Broad, C. D., ‘Kant’s first and second Commentary on the Critique of Pure analogies of experience’, Proceedings of the Reason (Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Aristotelian Society 25 (1926): 189–210. Court, 2006). –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of mathematical and –––––, ‘Replies to my critics’, Kantian philosophical reasoning’, Proceedings Review 16,2 (2011): 257–282. of the Aristotelian Society 41 (1941–2): Biro, J. I., ‘Kant and Strawson on 1–24. transcendental synthesis’, New –––––, ‘Kant’s mathematical antinomies’, Scholasticism 53 (1979): 486–501. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55 Bishop, P., Synchronicity and Intellectual (1954–5): 1–22. Intuition in Kant, Swedenborg and Jung Brook, A., ‘Imagination, possibility, (New York: Edwin Mellen, 2000). and personal identity’, American Blatnik, E., ‘Kant’s refutation of anti- Philosophical Quarterly 12 (1975): realism’, Journal of Philosophical 185–198. Research 19 (1994): 127–146. –––––, ‘Kant’s a priori methods for Böhme, G., ‘Towards a reconstruction recognizing necessary truths’, Canadian of Kant’s epistemology and theory of Journal of Philosophy 18 (supplement) science’, The Philosophical Forum 13 (1993): 215–252. (1981): 75–102. –––––, Kant and the Mind (Cambridge: Booth, E., ‘Kant’s critique of Newton’, Kant- Cambridge University Press, 1994). Studien 87 (1996): 149–165. –––––, ‘Critical Notice of Kant’s Bossart, W.H., ‘Kant and some Intuitionism’, Canadian Journal of metaphysicians’, Kant-Studien 55,1 Philosophy 28 (1998): 247–268. (1964): 20–36. –––––, ‘Kant, cognitive science and –––––, ‘Kant’s doctrine of the reciprocity contemporary neo-Kantianism’, Journal of freedom and reason’, International of Consciousness Studies 10–11 (2004): Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1968): 334–355. 1–25. –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental deduction’, Brown, D. S., ‘Patricia Kitcher and Kant’s Kant-Studien 68 (1977): 383–403. “real self”’, Southern Philosophy Review –––––, ‘Kant’s “Analytic” and the two- 13 (1997): 163–174. fold nature of time’, Kant-Studien 69,3 Brueckner, A., ‘The anti-sceptical epistemology (1978): 288–298. of the refutation of idealism’, Bristow, W. F., ‘Are Kant’s categories Philosophical Topics 19 (1991): 31–45. subjective?’, Review of Metaphysics 55,3 Bubner, R., ‘Kant, transcendental arguments, (2002): 551–581. and the problem of deduction’, Review of Brittan, G., Kant’s Theory of Science Metaphysics 28 (1975): 453–467. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, Brunton, J. A., ‘The second analogy and 1978). levels of argument’, Kant-Studien 62,3 –––––, ‘Kant’s philosophy of mathematics’, (1971): 378–391. in G. Bird (ed.) (2006), pp. 222–235. Buchdahl, G., ‘Causality, causal laws and –––––, ‘Graham Bird The Revolutionary scientific theory in the philosophy of Kant: introduction’, Kantian Review 16,2 Kant’, British Journal for the Philosophy (2011): 211–219. of Science, 16,3 (1965): 187–208.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘The relation between –––––, Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy “understanding” and “reason” in the (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, architectonic of Kant’s philosophy’, 2007). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67 Carl, W., Der schweigende Kant. Die (1967): 209–226. Entwürfe zu einer Deduktion der –––––, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Kategorien vor 1781 (Göttingen: Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989). –––––, ‘Gravity and intelligibility: Newton –––––, ‘Apperception and spontaneity’, to Kant’, in R. Butts & J. W. Davis (eds), International Journal of Philosophical The Methodological Heritage of Newton Studies 5 (1997): 147–163. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970), Carrier, M., ‘Kant’s relational theory of pp. 74–102. absolute space’, Kant-Studien 83 (1993): –––––, ‘Transcendental reduction’, Kant- 399–416. Studien 65,1 (1974): 28–44. –––––, ‘How to tell causes from effects: –––––, ‘The conception of lawlikeness in Kant’s causal theory of time and modern Kant’s ’, in L. W. approaches’, Studies in History and Beck (ed.) (1974), pp. 128–150. Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 59–71. –––––, ‘Science and God: the topology of the Carson, E. ‘Kant on intuition in geometry’, Kantian world’, The Southern Journal of Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27,4 Philosophy XXX (supplement) (1991): (1997): 489–512. 1–24. –––––, ‘Kant on method in mathematics’, –––––, Kant and the Dynamics of Reason Journal of the History of Philosophy 37,4 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992). (1999): 629–652. Bunch, A., ‘“Objective validity” and Cassam, Q., ‘Transcendental arguments, “objective reality” in Kant’s B-deduction transcendental synthesis and of the categories’, Kantian Review 14,2 transcendental idealism’, The (2010): 67–92. Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987): Butts, R. E., ‘Rules, examples and 355–378. constructions. Kant’s theory of –––––, ‘Inner sense, body sense, and Kant’s mathematics’, Synthese 47,2 (1981): “refutation of idealism”’, European 257–288. Journal of Philosophy 1,1 (1993): –––––, Kant and the Double Government 111–127. Methodology (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, –––––, Self and World (Oxford: Clarendon 1984). Press, 1997). Byrne, P., Kant on God (Aldershot: Ashgate, Cassirer, H. W., Kant’s First Critique 2007). (London: Allen & Unwin, 1954 Callanan, J., ‘Kant’s transcendental strategy’, [reprinted 1968 and 1978]). The Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): Castaneda, H. N., ‘The role of apperception 360–381. in Kant’s transcendental deduction of Caranti, L., ‘Kant’s criticism of Descartes the categories’, Noûs 24 (1990): 1–18. in the “Reflexionen zum Idealismus” Chakrabarti, A., ‘Idealist refutation of (1788–1793)’, Kant-Studien 97 (2006): idealism’, Idealistic Studies 22 (1992): 318–342. 93–106.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Chignell, A., ‘Kant, modality, and the most De Jong, W. R., ‘How is metaphysics as a real being’, Archiv für Geschichte der science possible?’, Review of Metaphysics Philosophie 91,2 (2009): 157–192. 49,2 (1995): 235–275. –––––, ‘Causal refutations of idealism’, The De Pierris, G., ‘Kant and innatism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 60,240 (2010): Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 487–507. 285–305. –––––, ‘Causal refutations of idealism Dicker, G., Kant’s Theory of Knowledge revisited’, The Philosophical Quarterly (New York: Oxford University Press, 61,242 (2011): 184–186. 2004). Chipman, L., ‘Kant’s categories and their –––––, ‘Kant’s refutation of idealism’, Noûs schematism’, Kant-Studien 63 (1972): 42,1 (2008): 80–108. 36–49. –––––, ‘Kant’s refutation of idealism: a –––––, ‘Things in themselves’, Philosophy reply to Chignell’, The Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 33,4 Quarterly 61,242 (2011): 175–183. (1972–3): 489–502. Dickerson, A. B., Kant on Representation Ciami, M., ‘About the argumentative and Objectivity (Cambridge: Cambridge structure of the Transcendental Analytic’, University Press, 2004). Studi Kantiani ix (1996): 27–46. Dodge, J., ‘Uniformity in empirical cause– Cicovacki, P., ‘An aporia of a priori effect relations in the second analogy’, knowledge’, Kant-Studien 82,3 (1991): Kant-Studien 73 (1982): 47–54. 349–360. Doyle, J. P., ‘Between transcendental and –––––, ‘On the normative aspect of concepts transcendent: the missing link?’, Review as rules’, Idealistic Studies 25 (1995): of Metaphysics 50,4 (1997): 783–816. 25–49. Dryer, D. P., Kant’s Solution for Verification Collins, A., Possible Experience: in Metaphysics (London: George Allen & Understanding Kant’s Critique of Unwin, 1966). Pure Reason (Berkeley: University of Dummett, M., ‘Frege and Kant on California Press, 1999). geometry’, Inquiry 25 (1982): 233–254. Collins, J., ‘Kant’s logic as a critical aid’, Duncan, H., ‘Inertia, the communication Review of Metaphysics 30,3 (1977): of motion, and Kant’s third law of 440–461. mechanics’, Philosophy of Science 51 Crawford, P. D., ‘Kant’s theory of (1984): 93–119. philosophical proof’, Kant-Studien 53,3 Dyck, C., ‘Empirical consciousness (1961–62): 257–268. explained’, Kantian Review 11 (2006): Croitorou, R., ‘A cognitive–architectonic 29–54. view of the transcendental object’, Revue –––––, ‘The divorce of reason and Roumaine de Philosophie 36 (1992): experience: Kant’s paralogisms of pure 319–325. reason in context’, Journal of the History Cummins, P., ‘Kant on outer and inner of Philosophy 47 (2009): 249–275. intuition’, Noûs 2 (1968): 271–292. –––––, ‘The Aeneas argument: personality Davis, G. F., ‘The self and spatial and immortality in Kant’s Third representation in Kant’s metaphysics of Paralogism’, (2010): experience’, Eidos 12,2 (1995): 27–48. 95–122.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental deduction themselves’, Kant-Studien 80 (1989): and the ghosts of Descartes and Hume’, 265–283. British Journal for the History of –––––, ‘Kant’s account of sensation’, Philosophy 19,3 (2011): 473–496. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 Earman, J., ‘Kant, incongruous counterparts, (1990): 63–88. and the nature of space and space–time’, –––––, ‘Was Kant a nativist?’, Journal of the Ratio (13) (1971): 1–18. History of Ideas, 50 (1990): 573–597. Edwards, J., Substance, Force and the –––––, ‘Kant’s account of intuition’, Possibility of Knowledge (Berkeley/Los Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21,2 Angeles: University of California Press, (1991): 165–193. 2000). –––––, Kant’s Intuitionism: A Elder, C. L., ‘Kant and the unity of Commentary on the Transcendental experience’, Kant-Studien 71,3 (1980): Aesthetic (Toronto: University of 299–307. Toronto Press, 1995). Engel, M. S., ‘Kant’s Copernican analogy: –––––, ‘Kant’s empiricism’, Review of a re-examination’, Kant-Studien 54,3 Metaphysics 50 (1997): 547–589. (1963): 243–251. –––––, ‘A double-edged sword? Kant’s England, F. E., Kant’s Conception of God refutation of Mendelssohn’s proof of (New York: Humanities Press, 1968 the immortality of the soul and its [1929]). implications for his theory of matter’, Engstrom, S., ‘The transcendental deduction Studies in History and Philosophy of and scepticism’, Journal of the History of Science 29 (1998): 561–588. Philosophy 32 (1994): 351–380. –––––, ‘Hume’s answer to Kant’, Noûs 32,3 Ertl, W., ‘Hume’s antinomy and Kant’s (1998): 331–360. critical turn’, British Journal for the –––––, ‘Localizing sensations: a reply to History of Philosophy 10,4 (2002): Anthony Quinton’s trouble with Kant’, 617–640. Philosophy 73,3 (1998): 479–489. Evans, J. C., ‘Two-steps-in-one-proof: –––––, ‘Langton on things in themselves’, the structure of the transcendental Kantian Review 5 (2000): 49–64. deduction’, Journal of the History of Fang, J., Kant and Mathematics Today (New Philosophy 28 (1990): 553–570. York: Edwin Mellen, 1997). Evans, J. D. G., ‘Kant’s analysis of the Fendt, G., For What May I Hope? Thinking paralogism of rational psychology in with Kant and Kierkegaard (New York: Critique of Pure Reason Edition B’, Peter Lang, 1990). Kantian Review 3 (1999): 99–105. Fenner, D. E. W., ‘Hume, Kant, and the Everitt, N., ‘Kant’s discussion of the subjectivity of causality’, Explorations in ’, Kant-Studien 86 Knowledge 10 (1993): 25–32. (1995): 385–405. Ferrari, J., ‘Das Ideal der reinen Vernunft’, Falkenstein, L. ‘Spaces and times: a Kantian in G. Mohr & M. Willaschek (eds), response’, Idealist Studies 16 (1986): Immanuel Kant. Kritik der reinen 1–11. Vernunft, in the series Klassiker Auslegen –––––, ‘Kant’s argument for the non- (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998), spatiotemporality of things in pp. 491–521.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Ferrarin, A. ‘Kant on the exhibition of a Friedman, M., ‘Kant on concepts and concept in intuition’, Kant-Studien 86 intuitions in the mathematical sciences’, (1995): 131–174. Synthese 84,2 (1990): 213–257. –––––, ‘Lived space, geometric space in –––––, Kant and the Exact Sciences Kant’, Studi Kantiani XIX (2006): (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University 11–30. Press, 1992). –––––, ‘Kant’s productive imagination and –––––, ‘Causal laws and the foundations of its alleged antecedents’, Graduate Faculty natural science’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (1992), Philosophy Journal 18 (1995): 65–92. pp. 161–199. Findlay, J. N., Kant and the Transcendental –––––, ‘Exorcising the philosophical Object: A Hermeneutic Study (Oxford: tradition’, The Philosophical Review Clarendon Press, 1981). 105,4 (1996): 427–467. –––––, ‘The central role of the thing-in-itself –––––, ‘Kantian themes in contemporary for Kant’, The Philosophical Forum 13 philosophy (I)’, Proceedings of the (1981): 51–65. Aristotelian Society, supplementary Fischer, N. (ed.), Kants Grundlegung einer volume 72 (1998): 111–129. kritischen Metaphysik (Hamburg: Meiner, –––––, ‘Logical form and the order of 2010). nature’, Archiv für Geschichte der Forgie, J. W., ‘Kant on the relation between Philosophie 82 (2000): 202–215. the cosmological and the ontological –––––, ‘Geometry, construction and arguments’, International Journal for intuition in Kant and his successors’, Philosophy of Religion 34,1 (1993): 1–12. in G. Sher & R. Tieszen (eds), Between –––––, ‘Kant and existence. Critique of Pure Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor Reason A600/B628’, Kant–Studien 99 of Charles Parsons (Cambridge: (2008): 1–12. Cambridge University Press, 2000), Förster, E., ‘Kant’s refutation of idealism’, pp. 186–218. in A. Holland (ed.), Philosophy, Its –––––, Dynamics of Reason (Chicago: History and Historiography (Dordrecht: University of Chicago Press, 2001). D. Reidel, 1985), pp. 287–303. –––––, ‘Kant, Kuhn, and the rationality of –––––, ‘Is there a “gap” in Kant’s critical science’, Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): system?’, Journal of the History of 171–190. Philosophy 25,4 (1987): 533–555. –––––, ‘Eckhart Förster and Kant’s Opus –––––, ‘Kant’s notion of philosophy’, Monist Postumum’, Inquiry 46 (2003): 215–227. 72 (1989): 285–304. –––––, ‘Transcendental philosophy and –––––, Kant’s Final Synthesis (Cambridge, mathematical physics’, Studies in History MA: Harvard University Press, 2000). and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): –––––, ‘Reply to Friedman and Guyer’, 29–43. Inquiry 46,2 (2003): 228–238. –––––, ‘Kant, scepticism and idealism’, Frangiotti, M. A., ‘Refuting Kant’s Inquiry 49,1 (2006): 26–43. refutation of idealism’, Idealistic Studies Fulkerson-Smith, B. A., ‘On the apodictic 25 (1995): 93–106. proof and validation of Kant’s Franzswa, G. E., ‘Space and the schematism’, revolutionary hypothesis’, Kantian Kant-Studien 69 (1978): 149–159. Review 15,1 (2010): 37–56.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Freydberg, B. Imagination and Depth in –––––, ‘Reason and substance: the Kantian Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (New metaphysics of conceptual positivism’, York: Peter Lang, 1994). Kant-Studien 70,4 (1982): 1–16. Freyenhagen, F., ‘Reasoning takes time: –––––, The Origins and Implications of on Allison and the timelessness of the Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Lewiston: intelligible self’, Kantian Review 13,2 Edwin Mellen, 1990). (2008), 67–84. –––––, ‘Knowing Kant’s antinomies: a Garnett, C. B., The Kantian Philosophy of meta-interpretive discussion’, The Space (New York: Columbia University Philosophical Forum 25 (1993): 1–18. Press, 1939). Gochnauer, M., ‘Kant’s refutation of Geiger, I., ‘Is the assumption of a systematic idealism’, Journal of the History of whole of empirical concepts a necessary Philosophy 12 (1974): 195–206. condition of knowledge?’, Kant-Studien Goldberg, N. J., ‘Do principles of reason have 94 (2003): 273–298. “objective but indeterminate validity”?’, Genova, A. C., ‘Kant’s three critiques: a Kant-Studien 95,4 (2004): 404–425. suggested analytical framework’, Kant- Gomes, A., ‘Is Kant’s transcendental Studien 60,2 (1969): 135–146. deduction of the categories fit for –––––, ‘Kant’s epigenesis of pure reason’, purpose?’, Kantian Review 15,2 (2010): Kant-Studien 65,3 (1974): 259–273. 118–137. –––––, ‘The purposive unity of Kant’s critical Gram, M. S., ‘Kant’s first antinomy’, The idealism’, Idealistic Studies 5 (1975): Monist 51 (1967): 511–518. 99–126. –––––, Kant, Ontology and the A Priori –––––, ‘Kant’s notion of transcendental (Evanston: Northwestern University presupposition in the first Critique’, Press, 1968). Philosophical Topics 12 (1981): –––––,‘How to dispense with things in 99–126. themselves (I) and (II)’, Ratio 18 (1976): –––––, ‘Good transcendental arguments’, 1–15 & 107–123. Kant-Studien 76,3 (1985): 468–485. –––––, ‘The crisis of syntheticity’, Kant- Gensler, H. J., ‘Logic and the first Critique’, Studien 7 (1980): 155–180. Kant-Studien 76,3 (1985): 276–287. –––––, ‘Intellectual intuition: the continuity George, R., ‘Kant’s sensationism’, Synthese thesis’, Journal of the History of Ideas 42 47 (1981): 229–255. (1981): 287–304. –––––, ‘Van Cleve and Kant’s Analogies’, –––––, ‘The skeptical attack on substance: Philosophy and Phenomenological Kantian answers’, Midwest Studies in Research 66 (2003): 203–210. Philosophy 8: (1983): 359–371. Ginsborg, H., ‘Kant and the Problem of –––––, The Transcendental Turn (Gainesville: Experience’, Philosophical Topics 34 University Press of Florida, 1984). (2006): 59–106. Grayeff, F., Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy Glouberman, M., ‘Kant on receptivity: form (Manchester: Manchester University and content’, Kant-Studien 66,3 (1975): Press, 1970 [1951]). 313–330. Greenberg, R., Kant’s Theory of A Priori –––––, ‘Conceptuality: an essay in retrieval’, Knowledge (University Park, PA: Penn Kant-Studien 70,4 (1979): 383–408. State University Press, 2001).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Necessity, existence and –––––, ‘On Kitcher on Kant and the Claims transcendental idealism’, Kantian Review of Knowledge’, Pacific Philosophical 11 (2006): 55–77. Quarterly 68 (1987): 317–331. Greenwood, J. D., ‘Kant’s third antinomy’, –––––, ‘The Postulates of Empirical Thinking International Philosophical Quarterly 30 in General and the Refutation of (1990): 43–57. Idealism’, in G. Mohr & M. Willaschek Greenwood, T., ‘A non sequitur of numbing (eds), Immanuel Kant. Kritik der reinen grossness’, Kant-Studien 72,1 (1981): Vernunft (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998), 11–30. pp. 297–324. Grier, M., ‘Illusion and fallacy in Kant’s first –––––, ‘Space, time and the categories: paralogism’, Kant-Studien 83 (1993): Kant’s project in the transcendental 257–282. deduction’, in R. Schumacher –––––, ‘Kant on the illusion of a systematic (ed.), Idealismus als Theorie der unity of nature’, History of Philosophy Repräsentation? (Padderborn: Mentis, Quarterly 14,1 (1997): 1–28. 2001), pp. 313–338. –––––, ‘Transcendental illusion and –––––, ‘Kant on common sense and scepticism’, transcendental realism in Kant’s second Kantian Review 7 (2003): 1–37. antinomy’, British Journal of the History –––––, ‘Kant’s answer to Hume?’, of Philosophy 6,1 (1998): 47–70. Philosophical Topics 31 (2003): 127–164. –––––, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental –––––, Kant’s System of Nature and Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge Freedom: Selected Essays (Cambridge: University Press, 2001). Cambridge University Press, 2005). –––––, ‘The revolutionary interpretation –––––, ‘The deduction of the categories. of the analytic of concepts’, Kantian The metaphysical and transcendental Review 16,2 (2011): 191–200. deductions’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), –––––, ‘The ideal of pure reason’, in P. Guyer pp. 118–150. (ed.) (2010), pp. 266–289. Hacyan, S., ‘On the transcendental ideality Grondin, J., ‘The conclusion of the of space and time in modern physics’, Critique of Pure Reason’, Graduate Kant-Studien 97 (2006): 382–395. Faculty Philosophy Journal 16 (1993): Hahn, R., Kant’s Newtonian Revolution in 165–178. Philosophy (Carbondale: Southern Illinois Guyer, P., ‘Kant on apperception and a University Press, 1988). priori synthesis’, American Philosophical Hall, B., ‘Appearances and the problem of Quarterly 17 (1980): 205–212. affection in Kant’, Kantian Review 14,2 –––––, ‘Kant’s intentions in the refutation (2010): 38–66. of idealism’, Philosophical Review 92 –––––, ‘A dilemma for Kant’s theory of (1983): 329–383. substance’, British Journal for the –––––, ‘The failure of the B-deduction’, History of Philosophy 19,1 (2011): Southern Journal of Philosophy XXV 79–110. (supplement) (1986): 67–84. Hanna, R., ‘Kant’s theory of empirical –––––, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge judgment and modern semantics’, History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 1987). 337–353.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘The trouble with truth in Kant’s as science and as philosophy’, in P. Guyer theory of meaning’, History of (ed.) (1992), pp. 200–227. Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 1–20. –––––, ‘What were Kant’s aims in the –––––, ‘A Kantian critique of scientific deduction?’, Philosophical Topics 31 essentialism’, Philosophy and (2003): 165–198. Phenomenological Research 58,3 (1998): Heidegger, M., Kant and the Problem of 497–528 Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana –––––, ‘How do we know necessary truths? University Press, 1991 [1929]). Kant’s answer’, European Journal of –––––, Phenomenological Critique of Kant’s Philosophy 6 (1998): 115–145. ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ (Bloomington: –––––, ‘The inner and the outer: Kant’s Indiana University Press, 1995 [1977]). “refutation” reconsidered’, Ratio 13 Henle, P., ‘The Critique of Pure Reason (2000): 146–174. today’, The Journal of Philosophy 59 –––––, ‘Why gold is necessarily a yellow (1962): 225–234. metal’, Kantian Review 4 (2000): Henrich, D., ‘The proof-structure of Kant’s 1–47. transcendental deduction’, Review of –––––, ‘Kant, truth and human nature’, Metaphysics 22 (1969): 640–659. British Journal for the History of –––––, The Unity of Reason: Essays on Philosophy 8,2 (2000): 225–250. Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: –––––, ‘Mathematics for humans: Kant’s Harvard University Press, 1994). philosophy of arithmetic revisited’, Herman, D. J., ‘The incoherence of Kant’s European Journal of Philosophy 10 dialectic’, Dialectica 45 (1991): 3–29. (2002): 328–353. Hillmer, P. M., The Antinomy Structure –––––, ‘Kant and nonconceptual content’, of Kant’s Transcendental Dialectic European Journal of Philosophy 13,2 (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 1989). (2005): 247–290. Hinske, N., ‘Die Rolle des –––––, ‘Kant, Causation, and Freedom’, Methodenproblems im Denken Kants’, in Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 N. Fischer (ed.), Kants Grundlegung einer (2006): 281–306. kritischen Metaphysik. Einführung in die –––––, Kant, Science, and Human Nature ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’ (Hamburg: (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006). Meiner, 2010), pp. 343–354. Harder, J.Y., ‘L’incommensurable’, in Kant Hintikka, J., ‘Kant’s “new method of et les Mathématiques, Les Cahiers thought” and his theory of mathematics’, Philosophiques de Strasbourg 26 (2009): Ajatus 27,3 (1965): 37–47. 57–80. –––––, ‘Are mathematical truths synthetic a Harper, W., ‘Kant’s empirical realism and the priori?’, Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968): second analogy of experience’, Synthese 640–651. 47 (1981): 465–480. –––––, ‘Kantian intuition’, Inquiry 15 –––––, ‘Kant on space, empirical realism and (1972): 341–345. the foundations of geometry’, Topoi 3 –––––, Logic, Language-Games and (1984): 143–161. Information: Kantian Themes in the Hatfield, G., ‘Empirical, rational and Philosophy of Logic (Oxford: Clarendon transcendental psychology: psychology Press, 1973).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kant on existence, predication, and Hughes, R. I. G., ‘Kant’s third paralogism’, the ontological argument’, Dialectica 35 Kant-Studien 74,4 (1983): 405–411. (1981): 128–146. –––––, ‘Kant’s analogies and the structure Hoagland, J., ‘The thing in itself in English of objective time’, Pacific Philosophical interpretations of Kant’, American Quarterly 71 (1990): 141–163. Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1973): 1–14. Humphrey, T., ‘The historical and Hoefer, C., ‘Kant’s hands and Earman’s conceptual relations between Kant’s pions’, International Studies in the metaphysics of space and philosophy Philosophy of Science 14 (2000): of geometry’, Journal of the History of 237–256. Philosophy 11 (1973): 483–512. Hogan, D., ‘Kant’s Copernican turn and the Hurley, S., ‘Kant and the myth of the giving’, rationalist tradition’, in P. Guyer (ed.) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2010), pp. 21–40. XCVI (1994): 137–164. Horstmann, R. P., ‘Space as intuition and –––––, ‘Myth upon myth’, Proceedings of geometry’, Ratio 28 (1976): 17–30. the Aristotelian Society XCVIII (1996): –––––, ‘The metaphysical deduction in 253–260. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason’, The Hymers, M., ‘The role of Kant’s refutation Philosophical Forum 13 (1981): 32–47. of idealism’, Southern Journal of –––––, ‘Der Anhang zur transzendentalen Philosophy (1991): 51–68. Dialektik (A642/B670–A704/B732). Die –––––, ‘Kant’s private-clock argument’, Idee der systematischen Einheit’, in Kant-Studien 88 (1997): 442–461. G. Mohr & M. Willaschek (eds), Immanuel Jacquette, D., ‘Kant’s second antinomy Kant. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in the and Hume’s theory of extensionless series Klassiker Auslegen (Berlin: Akademie indivisibles’, Kant-Studien 84 (1993): Verlag, 1998), pp. 525–545. 38–50. Hossenfelder, M., ‘Allison’s defense of Kant’s Janiak, A., ‘Kant as of science’, transcendental idealism’, Inquiry 33 Perspectives on Science 12,3 (2004): (1990): 467–479. 339–363. Howell, R., ‘Intuition, synthesis, and Jardine, N., ‘Hermeneutic strategies in individuation in the Critique of Pure Gerd Buchdahl’s Kantian philosophy Reason’, Noûs 7 (1973): 207–232. of science’, Studies in the History –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): Analysis of Main Themes in the Critical 183–208. Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992). Justin, G., ‘On Kant’s analysis of Berkeley’, –––––, ‘The conundrum of the object and Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 other problems from Kant’, Kantian (1973): 43–63. Review 8 (2004): 115–136. –––––, ‘Re-relating Kant and Berkeley’, Hudson, H., Kant’s Compatibilism (Ithaca, Kant-Studien 68 (1977): 77–89. NY: Cornell University Press, 1994). Kalin, M., ‘Idealism against realism in Hughes, J. C., ‘Systematicity and scientific Kant’s third antinomy’, Kant-Studien explanation in the Critique of Pure 69,2 (1978): 160–169. Reason and the Critique of Judgment’, Katz, C. E., ‘The neglected alternative Dialogue 46,1 (2003): 1–14. in Kant’s philosophy revisited’, South

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

West Philosophy Review 11 (1995): –––––, ‘Kant’s epistemological project and 91–100. its coherent solution’, Philosophical Keller, P., Kant and the Demands of Self- Perspectives 13 (1999): 415–441. Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge –––––, ‘On interpreting Kant’s thinker as University Press, 2001). Wittgenstein’s “I”’, Philosophy and Kemp Smith, N. A., Commentary to Kant’s Phenomenological Research 61,1 (2000): ‘Critique of Pure Reason’, second edition 33–63. (London/New York: Macmillan, 1923). –––––, Kant’s Thinker (New York: Oxford Khatami, M., ‘Kant and Husserl on the University Press, 2011). transcendental’, Existentia 12 (2002): Kitcher, Ph., ‘Kant and the foundations of 365–376. mathematics’, The Philosophical Review Kielkopf, C. F., ‘Kant’s deontic logic’, 84,1 (1975): 23–50. International Logic Review 7 (1976): –––––, ‘A priori’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), 66–75. pp. 28–60. Kim, J., ‘Concepts and intuitions in Kant’s Kjosavik, F., ‘Kant on geometrical intuition philosophy of geometry’, Kant-Studien and the foundations of mathematics’, 97,2 (2006): 138–162. Kant-Studien 100 (2009): 1–27. Kitchener, R. F., ‘Is transcendental Klass, G. M., ‘A framework for reading psychology possible?’, New Ideas in Kant on apperception: seven interpretive Psychology 17 (1999): 195–203. questions’, Kant-Studien 94,1 (2002): Kitcher, P., ‘Kant on self-identity’, 80–94. Philosophical Review 91 (1982): 41–72. Klemme, H., Kants Philosophie des Subjekts –––––, ‘Kant’s paralogisms’, Philosophical (Hamburg: Meiner, 1996). Review 91,4 (1982): 515–547. –––––, ‘Die Axiome der Anschauung und –––––, ‘Connecting concepts and intuitions die Antizipationen der Wahrnehmung’, at B160n’, Southern Journal of Philosophy in G. Mohr & M. Willaschek (eds), XXV (supplement) (1986): 137–150. Immanuel Kant. Kritik der reinen –––––, ‘Kant’s patchy epistemology’, Pacific Vernunft, in the series Klassiker Auslegen Philosophical Quarterly 68, 3–4 (1987): (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998), 306–316. pp. 247–266. –––––, ‘Discovering the forms of intuition’, Klimmek, N., Kants System der The Philosophical Review 96,2 (1987): transzendentalen Ideen (Berlin/New York: 205–248. Walter de Gruyter, 2005). –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Psychology Kneller, J., Kant and the Power of (New York: Oxford University Press, Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge 1990). University Press, 2007). –––––, ‘Changing the name of the game’, Körner, S., Kant (London: Penguin, 1955). Philosophical Topics 19 (1991): 201–236. Kornfein, R., Kant and the Metaphysics of –––––, ‘Revisiting Kant’s epistemology’, Reference (Ottawa: National Library of Noûs 29 (1995): 285–315. Canada, 1982). –––––, ‘Kant on self-consciousness’, The Kotzin, R., & Baumgärtner, J., ‘Sensations Philosophical Review 108,3 (1999): and Judgments of perceptions’, Kant- 345–368. Studien 81 (1990): 401–412.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Krauser, P., ‘The operational conception of –––––, ‘Reply to Falkenstein’, Kantian ‘Reine Anschauung’ in Kant’s theory of Review 5 (2001): 64–72. experience and science’, Studies in the –––––, ‘Problems from Kant by James Van History and Philosophy of Science 3 Cleve’, Philosophy and Phenomenological (1972–73): 81–87. Research LXVI,1 (2003): 211–218. –––––, ‘“Form of intuition” and “formal –––––, ‘Elusive knowledge of things in intuition” in Kant’s theory of experience themselves’, Australasian Journal of and science’, Studies in the History and Philosophy 82 (2004): 129–136. Philosophy of Science 4 (1973–74): –––––, ‘Kant’s phenomena: extrinsic or 279–287. intrinsic properties? A reply to Allais’, –––––, ‘Kant’s schematism of the categories Philosophy and Phenomenological and the problem of pattern recognition’, Research LXXIII,1 (2006): 143–169. Synthese 33,1 (1976): 175–192. Lantin, R., ‘On Kant’s argument in the Kroon, F. & Nola, E., ‘Kant, Kripke, and second analogy’, Philosophia 27,3–4 gold’, Kant-Studien 78 (1987): 442–458. (1999): 483–495. Kuehn, M., ‘How, or why, do we come to Lavely, J., ‘Comment on Findlay and the of a world of things in themselves?’ thing-in-itself’, The Philosophical Forum Kantian Review 16,2 (2011): 221–233. 13 (1981): 66–74. Kwang-Sae, L., ‘Kant on empirical concepts, Leavitt, F. J., ‘Kant’s schematism and the empirical laws and scientific theories’, philosophy of geometry’, Studies in Kant-Studien 72,4 (1981): 398–414. History and Philosophy of Science 22 Landy, D., ‘Inferentialism and the (1991): 647–659. Transcendental Deduction’, Kantian Leppäkoski, M., The Transcendental How: Review 14,1 (2009): 1–30. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of Langsam, H., ‘Kant, Hume and our ordinary Object Cognition (Stockholm: Almqvuist conception of causation’, Philosophy and & Wiksell, 1993). Phenomenological Research 54,3 (1994): –––––, ‘The two steps of the B-Deduction’, 625–647. Kantian Review 2 (1998): 107–116. –––––, ‘Kant’s compatibilism and his Lipson, M., ‘On Kant on space’, Pacific two conceptions of truth’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (1992): Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2001): 73–90. 164–188. Long, C. P., ‘Two powers, one ability’, Langston, D., ‘The supposed incompatibility Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 between Kant’s refutations of idealism’, (1998): 233–253. Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 Longuenesse, B. Kant and the Capacity to (1979): 359–369. Judge (Princeton: Princeton University Langton, R., ‘Receptivity and Kantian Press, 1998). humility’, Australasian Society for the –––––, ‘Kant’s categories and the capacity of History of Philosophy Yearbook (1994): judge: responses to Henry Allison and Sally 1–25. Sedgwick’, Inquiry 43 (2000): 91–110. –––––, Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of –––––, ‘Kant’s deconstruction of the Things in Themselves (Oxford: Oxford principle of sufficient reason’, in University Press, 1998). Longuenesse (2005), pp. 117–142.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, Kant on the Human Standpoint –––––, Having the World in View: Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars (Cambridge, 2005). MA: Harvard University Press, 2009). –––––, ‘Kant on a priori concepts. The McGoldrick, P. M., ‘The metaphysical metaphysical deduction of the categories’, exposition’, Kant-Studien 76,3 (1985): in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 129–168. 257–275. –––––, ‘Kant on the identity of persons’, Melnick, A., Kant’s Analogies of Experience Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, CVII (2007): 149–167. 1973). Loparic, Z., ‘The logical structure of the first –––––, ‘The geometry of a form of intuition’, antinomy’, Kant-Studien 81,3 (1990): Topoi 3,2 (1984): 163–168. 280–303. –––––, Space, Time and Thought in Kant Macbeth, D., ‘Empirical knowledge: (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1989). Kantian themes and Sellarsian variations’, –––––, ‘Kant’s proofs of substance and 101 (2000): 113–142. causation’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), Macann, C. E., Kant and the Foundations of pp. 203–237. Metaphysics (Heidelberg: Winter, 1981). –––––, Kant’s Theory of the Self (London/ Madigan, P. S., ‘Time in Locke and Kant’, New York: Routledge, 2009). Kant-Studien 67 (1976): 20–50. Merritt, M. M., ‘Kant on the transcendental Martin, G., Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory deduction of space and time’, Kantian of Science (Manchester: Manchester Review 14, 2 (2010): 1–37. University Press, 1955). Meyer, M., ‘Why did Kant write two Mattey, G. J., ‘Kant’s conception of versions of the transcendental deduction Berkeley’s idealism’, Kant-Studien 74 of the categories?’, Synthese 47,3 (1981): (1983): 161–175. 357–383. –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of propositional Mijuskovic, B., ‘The premise of the attitudes’, Kant-Studien 77,4 (1986): transcendental analytic’, The Philosophical 423–440. Quarterly 23 (1973): 156–161. McCall, J. L., ‘A response to Burkhard –––––, The Achilles of Rationalist Tuschling’s critique of Kant’s physics’, Arguments (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974). Kant-Studien 79 (1988): 57–79. Miles, M., ‘Kant’s “Copernican Revolution”: –––––, ‘Metaphysical foundations and toward rehabilitation of a concept ponderomotive nature’, Kant-Studien 96 and provision of a framework for the (2005): 269–311. interpretation of the Critique of Pure McCann, E., ‘Skepticism and Kant’s Reason’, Kant-Studien 97 (2006): 1–32. transcendental deduction’, History of Miller, G. W., ‘Kant’s first edition refutation Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 71–90. of dogmatic idealism’, Kant-Studien 62 McDowell, J., Mind and World, second (1971): 298–317. edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard –––––, ‘Kant and Berkeley’, Kant–Studien 64 University Press, 21996). (1973): 315–335. –––––, ‘Having the world in view: Sellars, Miller, L. W., ‘Kant’s philosophy of Kant and intentionality’, Journal of mathematics’, Kant-Studien 66,3 (1975): Philosophy 95 (1998): 431–491. 297–308.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Mischel, T., ‘Kant and the possibility of a Oguah, B. E., ‘Transcendental arguments science of psychology’, The Monist 51 and mathematical intuition in Kant’, (1967): 599–622. Kant-Studien 71 (1980): 35–46. Mitscherling, J., ‘Kant’s notion of intuition’, Onof, C., ‘Thinking the in–itself and its Kant-Studien 72,2 (1981): 186–194. relation to appearances’, in D. Schulting Moore, A. W., ‘The transcendental doctrine & J. Verburgt (eds) (2011), pp. 211–236. of method’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), Osborne, G., ‘Two major recent approaches pp. 310–326. to Kant’s second analogy’, Kant-Studien –––––, ‘Bird on Kant’s mathematical 97 (2006): 409–429. antinomies’, Kantian Review 16,2 (2011): O’Shea, J. R., ‘The needs of understanding’, 235–243. International Journal of Philosophical Moretto, A., ‘Philosophie transcendantale Studies 5,2 (1997): 216–254. et géométrie non-euclidienne’, Kant et les Palmquist, S. R., ‘Kant on Euclid: Mathématiques, Les Cahiers Philosophiques geometry in perspective’, Philosophy of de Strasbourg 26 (2009): 117–140. Mathematics 5 (1990): 88–113. Morrison, M. C., ‘Community and –––––, Kant’s System of Perspectives (New coexistence: Kant’s third analogy of York: University Press of America, 1993). experience’, Kant-Studien 89 (1998): Parsons, C., ‘Infinity and Kant’s conception 257–277. of the “possibility of experience”’, The Motta, G., Kants Philosophie der Philosophical Review 73 (1964): 183–197. Notwendigkeit (Frankfurt a/M: Peter –––––, ‘Kant and conceptual semantics’, Lang, 2007). Topoi 10 (1991): 67–78. Nagel, G., The Structure of Experience –––––, ‘Kant’s philosophy of arithmetic’, in (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, C. Posy (ed.) (1992), pp. 43–79. 1983). –––––, ‘On some difficulties concerning Noland, J., ‘Kant on meaning: two studies’, intuition and intuitive knowledge’, Mind Kant-Studien 70 (1979): 113–130. 102 (1993): 233–246. Norris, C., ‘McDowell on Kant’, Patten, S. C., ‘An anti-sceptical argument at Metaphilosophy 31,4 (2000): 382–411. the deduction’, Kant-Studien 67 (1976): Nussbaum, C., ‘Concepts, judgments, and 550–569. unity in Kant’s metaphysical deduction of Paton, H. J., Kant’s Metaphysics of the relational categories’, Journal of the Experience, 2 vols. (London: Allen & History of Philosophy 28,1 (1990): 89–103. Unwin, 1936). –––––, ‘Critical and pre–Critical phases in Pereboom, D., ‘Kant on intentionality’, Kant’s philosophy of logic’, Kant-Studien Synthese 77 (1988): 321–352. 83,3 (1992): 280–293. –––––, ‘Kant on justification in Nuyen, A. T., ‘On interpreting Kant’s transcendental philosophy’, Synthese architectonic in terms of the hermeneutic 85 (1990): 25–54. model’, Kant-Studien 84 (1993): –––––, ‘Is Kant’s transcendental philosophy 154–166. inconsistent?’, History of Philosophy Nuzzo, A. Ideal Embodiment: Kant’s Quarterly 8 (1991): 357–372. Theory of Sensibility (Bloomington: –––––, ‘Assessing Kant’s master argument’, Indiana University Press, 2008). Kantian Review 5 (2001): 90–102.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Pinkerton, R. J., ‘Kant’s refutation of Remnant, P., ‘Kant and the cosmological the ontological argument’, Indian argument’, The Australasian Journal of Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1977): Philosophy 37 (1959): 152–155. 19–38. Rescher, N., ‘On the status of “things Pippin, R. B., Kant’s Theory of Form in themselves”’, Synthese 47 (1981): (New Haven: Yale University Press, 289–300. 1982). –––––, Kant and the Reach of Reason –––––, ‘Kant on the spontaneity of mind’, in R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, B. Pippin, Idealism as Modernism. Hegelian 2000). Variations (Cambridge: Cambridge Robinson, H., ‘Incongruent counterparts University Press, 1997), pp. 29–55. and the refutation of idealism’, Kant- Plantinga, A., ‘Kant’s objection to the Studien 72 (1981): 391–397. ontological argument’, Journal of –––––, ‘Intuition and manifold in the Philosophy 63 (1966): 537–545. Transcendental Deduction’, Southern Porter, L., ‘Does the transcendental Journal of Philosophy 22 (1984): deduction contain a refutation of 403–412. idealism?’, Kant-Studien 74,4 (1983): –––––, ‘Two perspectives on Kant’s 487–499. appearances and things in themselves’, Posy, C., ‘The language of appearances and Journal of the History of Philosophy 32,3 things in themselves’, Synthese 47 (1981): (1994): 411–441. 313–352. Roche, A., ‘Kant’s principle of sense’, British –––––, ‘Dancing to the antinomy: a proposal Journal for the History of Philosophy for transcendental idealism’, American 18,4 (2010): 663–692. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1983): Rödl, S., Kategorien des Zeitlichen 81–94. (Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 2005). –––––, ‘Kant’s mathematical realism’, in C. Rogerson, K. F., ‘Kantian ontology’, Kant- Posy (ed.) (1992), pp. 293–313. Studien 84,1 (1993): 3–24. Powell, C. T., ‘Kant, elanguesence and Rohlf, M., ‘The ideas of pure reason’, in degrees of reality’, Philosophy and P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 190–209. Phenomenological Research 46,2 (1985): Rosenberg, J., ‘“I think”: some reflections 199–217. on Kant’s paralogisms’, Midwest –––––, Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness Studies in Philosophy 10 (1986): (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990). 503–531. Radner, M. & Radner, D., ‘Kantian space Rosenkoetter, T., ‘Kant on apperception and the ontological alternatives’, Kant- and the unity of judgment’, Inquiry 49,5 Studien 78 (1987): 385–402. (2006): 469–489. Rauscher, F., ‘The appendix to the Dialectic Rosenthal, J., ‘A transcendental deduction and the Canon of Reason: the positive of the categories without the categories’, role of reason’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), International Philosophical Quarterly 33 pp. 290–309. (1993): 449–464. Reich, K., The Completeness of Kant’s Rubenstein, E. M., ‘Rethinking Kant on Table of Judgments (Stanford: Stanford individuation’, Kantian Review 5 (2001): University Press, 1992) 73–89.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Schaper, E., ‘Kant’s schematism Schulting, D., ‘Kant’s Copernican analogy: reconsidered’, Review of Metaphysics 8 beyond the non-specific reading’, Studi (1964): 267–282. Kantiani XXII (2009): 39–65. –––––, ‘The Kantian thing-in-itself as a –––––, ‘Kant’s idealism: the current debate’, philosophical fiction’, The Philosophical in D. Schulting & J. Verburgt (eds) Quarterly 16 (1966): 233–243. (2011), pp. 1–28. Schmiege, O., ‘What is Kant’s second –––––, ‘Limitation and idealism: Kant’s antinomy about?’, Kant-Studien 97 “long” argument from the categories’, in (2006): 272–300. D. Schulting & J. Verburgt (eds) (2011), Schrader, G., ‘The thing in itself in Kantian pp. 159–191. philosophy’, Review of Metaphysics 2 –––––, Kant’s Deduction and Apperception. (1949): 30–44. Explaining the Categories (Basingstoke/ –––––, ‘The transcendental ideality and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). empirical reality of Kant’s space and –––––, ‘Non-apperceptive consciousness’, in time’, Review of Metaphysics 4 (1951): R. Pozzo, P. Giordanetti & M. Sgarbi (eds), 507–536. Kant’s Philosophy of the Unconscious –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of concepts’, Kant- (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, Studien 49 (1957): 264–278. 2012). Schwyzer, H., The Unity of Understanding: Sellars, W., Science and Metaphysics: A Study in Kantian Problems (Oxford: Variations on Kantian Themes (London: Clarendon Press, 1990). Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968). Senderowicz, Y. M., ‘Figurative synthesis –––––, ‘ “ . . . this I or he or it (the thing) which and synthetic a priori knowledge’, Review thinks . . .” ’ , Proceedings of the American of Metaphysics LVII,4 (2004): 755–786. Philosophical Association 44 (1972): 5–31. Shabel, L., ‘Kant on the “symbolic –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Metaphysics construction” of mathematical (Atascadero: Ridgeview, 2002). concepts’, Studies in History and –––––, Kant and Pre-Kantian Themes Philosophy of Science 29,4 (1998): (Atascadero: Ridgeview, 2002). 589–621. Skorpen, E., ‘Kant’s refutation of idealism’, –––––, Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 Philosophy (London/New York: (1962): 23–34. Routledge, 2003). Smit, H., ‘Kant on marks and the immediacy –––––, ‘Reflections on Kant’s concept (and of intuition’, The Philosophical Review intuition) of space’, Studies in the History 109 (2000): 235–266. and Philosophy of Science 34,1 (2003): Smith, W., ‘Kant and the general law of 45–57. causality’, Philosophical Studies 32,2 –––––, ‘Kant’s “argument from geometry”’, (1977): 113–128. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42,2 Stine, W., ‘Self-consciousness in Kant’s (2004): 195–215. Critique of Pure Reason’, Philosophical –––––, ‘Kant’s philosophy of mathematics’, Studies 28 (1975): 189–197. in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 94–128. Srzednicki, J., ‘On Strawson’s criticism of –––––, ‘The Transcendental Aesthetic’, in Kant’s “transcendental idealism”’, Kant- P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 93–117. Studien 75 (1984): 94–103.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Stapleford, S., Kant’s Transcendental –––––, ‘Kant on arithmetic, algebra and Arguments: Disciplining Pure Reason the theory of proportions’, Journal of (London: Continuum, 2008). the History of Philosophy 44,4 (2006): Sturm, T., ‘How not to investigate the 533–558. human mind: Kant on the impossibility of Swing, T. K., Kant’s Transcendental Logic empirical psychology’, in E. Watkins (ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press, (2001), pp. 163–184. 1969). Strawson, P. F., The Bounds of Sense: An Thielke, P., ‘Discursivity and causality: Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Maimon’s challenge to the second analogy’, (London: Methuen, 1966). Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 440–463. –––––, ‘Imagination and perception’, in Thomas, A., ‘Kant, McDowell, and the Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays theory of consciousness’, European (London: Methuen, 1974), pp. 45–65. Journal of Philosophy 5,3 (1997): –––––, ‘Kant on substance’, in Entity and 283–305. Identity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), Thompson, M., ‘Singular terms and pp. 268–279. intuitions in Kant’s epistemology’, Review Stern, R. (ed.), Transcendental Arguments: of Metaphysics 26 (1972): 314–343. Problems and Prospects (Oxford: –––––, ‘Things in themselves’, Proceedings Clarendon Press, 1999). and Addresses of the American –––––, ‘Metaphysical dogmatism, Humean Philosophical Association 57 (1983): scepticism, Kantian criticism’, Kantian 33–48. Review 11 (2006): 102–116. Thorpe, L., ‘Is Kant’s realm of ends a Unum Stroud, B., ‘Kant and skepticism’, in M. per Se?’, British Journal for the History of Burnyeat (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition Philosophy 18,3 (2010): 461–486. (Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of Turbayne, C., ‘Kant’s refutation of dogmatic California Press, 1983). idealism’, The Philosophical Quarterly 5 Stuart, J. D., ‘Kant’s two refutations of (1955): 225–244. idealism’, Southwestern Journal of Van Cleve, J., ‘Four recent interpretations of Philosophy 6 (1975): 29–46. Kant’s second analogy’, Kant-Studien 64 Suchting, W. A., ‘Kant’s second analogy (1973): 71–87. of experience’, Kant-Studien 58 (1967): –––––, ‘Substance, matter and the first 355–369. analogy’, Kant-Studien 70 (1979): Sutherland, D., ‘The role of magnitude in 149–161. Kant’s critical philosophy’, Canadian –––––, ‘Putnam, Kant, and secondary Journal of Philosophy 34,3 (2004): qualities’, Philosophical Papers 24 411–442. (1995): 83–109. –––––, ‘Kant’s philosophy of mathematics –––––, Problems From Kant (New York: and the Greek mathematical tradition’, Oxford University Press, 1999). The Philosophical Review 113,2 (2004): Verburgt, J., ‘How to account for reason’s 157–201. interest in an ultimate prototype? A note –––––, ‘The point of Kant’s axioms of on Kant’s doctrine of the transcendental intuition’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Ideal’, in D. Schulting & J. Verburgt (eds) 86 (2005): 135–159. (2011), pp. 237–254.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Vogel, J., ‘The problem of self-knowledge Philosophy of Science (Chicago, La Salle, in Kant’s “Refutation of Idealism”: IL: Open Court, 2009), pp. 193–241. two recent views’, Philosophy and Wartenburg, T., ‘Order through reason’, Phenomenological Research 53 (1993): Kant-Studien 70 (1979): 409–424. 875–887. Washburn, M., ‘The second edition of the Walker, R. C. S., Kant (London: Routledge Critique; towards an understanding of & Kegan Paul, 1978). its nature and genesis’, Kant-Studien 66 –––––, ‘Synthesis and transcendental (1975): 277–290. idealism’, Kant-Studien 76 (1985): 14–27. –––––, ‘Did Kant have a theory of self– –––––, ‘Kant’s Conception of Empirical knowledge?’, Archiv für Geschichte der Law’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Philosophie 58 (1976): 40–56. Society, supplementary volume (1990): Watkins, E., ‘Kant’s third analogy of 243–258. experience’, Kant-Studien 88 (1997): ––––– ,‘Kant on the number of worlds’, 406–441. British Journal for the History of –––––, ‘The argumentative structure of Philosophy 18,5 (2010), 821–844. Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Walsh, S., ‘Incongruent counterparts and Natural Science’, Journal of the History causality’, Kant-Studien 98 (2007): of Philosophy 36 (1998): 567–583. 418–430. –––––, ‘Kant’s justification of the laws Walsh, W. H., ‘Philosophy and psychology in of mechanics’, Studies in History and Kant’s critique’, Kant-Studien 57 (1966): Philosophy of Science 29, (1998): 539–560. 186–198. –––––, ‘Kant on rational cosmology’, in –––––, Kant’s Criticism of Metaphysics E. Watkins (ed.) (2001): pp. 70–89. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental idealism and 1975). the categories’, History of Philosophy Ward, A., ‘On Kant’s second analogy and Quarterly 19 (2002): 191–215. his reply to Hume’, Kant-Studien 77 –––––, ‘Forces and causes in Kant’s early (1986): 409–422. pre-Critical writings’, Studies in History –––––, ‘Kant’s first analogy of experience’, and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 387–406. 5–27. –––––, Kant: The Three Critiques (Oxford: –––––, ‘Kant’s model of causality: causal Polity Press, 2005). powers, laws, and Kant’s reply to Hume’, Warren, D., ‘Kant and the apriority of Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 space’, The Philosophical Review 107,2 (2004): 449–88. (1998): 179–224. –––––, Kant and the Metaphysics of –––––, Reality and Impenetrability in Causality (Cambridge: Cambridge Kant’s Philosophy of Nature (New York: University Press, 2005). Routledge, 2001). –––––, ‘Kant on the hiddenness of God’, –––––, ‘Kant on attractive and repulsive Kantian Review 14,1 (2009): 81–122. force: the balancing argument’, in M. –––––, ‘The system of principles’, in Domski & M. Dickson (eds), Discourse P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 151–167. on a New Method. Reinvigorating Watkins, E. & Fisher, M., ‘Kant on the the Marriage between History and material ground of possibility: from The

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Only Possible Argument to the Critique Wilson K. D., ‘Kant on intuition’, of Pure Reason’, Review of Metaphysics Philosophical Quarterly 25 (1975): 52 (1998): 369–395. 247–265. Waxman, W., Kant’s Model of the Mind: Wilson, M., ‘Kant and “the Dogmatic A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism of Berkeley”’, Journal of the Idealism (Oxford: Oxford University History of Philosophy 9 (1971): 459–475. Press, 1991). Wike, V. S., Kant’s Antinomies of Reason Weizacker, C. F., ‘Kant’s “first analogy of (Washington, DC: University Press of experience” and conservation principles America,, 1982). of physics’, Synthese 23 (1971): 75–95. Wood, A., ‘Kant’s Dialectic’, Canadian Werkmeister, W., ‘Kant’s refutation of Journal of Philosophy 5,4 (1975): idealism’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 595–614. 15 (1977): 551–565. –––––, Kant’s Rational Theology (Ithaca, –––––, Kant’s Silent Decade (Tallahasee, FL: NY: Cornell University Press, 2009 University Press of Florida, 1979). [1978]). –––––, Kant: The Architectonic and –––––, ‘The antinomies of pure reason’, in Development of his Philosophy (Chicago, P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 245–265. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1980). Wuerth, J., ‘The paralogisms of pure reason’, Westphal, K. R., ‘Kant’s dynamic in P. Guyer (ed.) (2010), pp. 210–244. constructions’, Journal of Philosophical Young, J. M., ‘Kant on existence’, Ratio 18 Research 20 (1995): 382–429. (1976): 91–106. –––––, ‘Kant, Hegel, and the transcendental –––––, ‘Kant on the construction of material conditions of possible arithmetical concepts’, Kant-Studien 73 experience’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society (1982): 17–46. of Great Britain 33 (1996): 23–41. –––––, ‘Kant’s view of the imagination’, –––––, ‘Affinity, idealism and naturalism: the Kant-Studien 79 (1988): 140–164. stability of cinnabar and the possibility of experience’, Kant-Studien 88 (1997): 139–189. –––––, ‘Noumenal causality reconsidered’, 8. Kant’s Practical Philosophy Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (1997): 209–245. Acton, H. B., Kant’s Moral Philosophy –––––, ‘Freedom and the distinction between (London: Macmillan, 1970). phenomena and noumena’, Journal of Allison, H. E., ‘The concept of freedom in Philosophical Research 26 (2001): 593–622. Kant’s “semi-critical” ethics’, Archiv für –––––, Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1986): Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge 96–115. University Press, 2004). –––––, ‘Morality and freedom: Kant’s –––––, ‘Comments on Graham Bird’s The reciprocity thesis’, The Philosophical Revolutionary Kant’, Kantian Review Review 95 (1986): 393–425. 16,2 (2011): 245–255. –––––, Kant’s Theory of Freedom Westphal, M., ‘In defense of the thing in (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, itself’, Kant-Studien 59 (1968): 118–141. 1990).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kant’s doctrine of obligatory ends’, Archibugi, D., ‘Immanuel Kant, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 1 (1993): cosmopolitan law and peace’, European 7–23. Journal of International Relations 1,4 –––––, ‘Kant on freedom: A reply to my (1995): 429–456. critics’, in Allison (1996), pp. 109–128. Arntzen, S., ‘Kant’s denial of absolute –––––, ‘Autonomy and spontaneity in Kant’s sovereignty’, Pacific Philosophical conception of the self’, in Allison (1996), Quarterly 76 (1995): 1–16. pp. 129–142. –––––, ‘Kant on duty to oneself and –––––, Idealism and Freedom: Essays resistance to political authority’, Journal on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996): Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge 409–424. University Press, 1996). Atwell, J. E., ‘Objective ends in Kant’s –––––, ‘Ethics, evil and anthropology’, ethics’, Archiv für Geschichte der Ethics 111,3 (2001): 594–613. Philosophie 56 (1974): 156–171. –––––, ‘Kant on freedom of the will’, in P. –––––, ‘Kant’s moral model and moral Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 381–415. universe’, History of Philosophy Ameriks, K. ‘Kant’s deduction of freedom Quarterly 3 (1983): 423–436. and morality’, Journal of the History of –––––, Ends and Principles in Kant’s Moral Philosophy 19 (1981): 53–79. Thought (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, –––––, ‘On Schneewind and Kant’s method 1986). in ethics’, Ideas y Valores 102 (1996): Audi. R., The Good in the Right (Princeton: 28–53. University of Princeton Press, 2004). Anderson–Gold, S., ‘Kant’s rejection of Aune, B., Kant’s Theory of Morals (Princeton: devilishness: the limits of human volition’, Princeton University Press, 1979). Idealistic Studies 14 (1984): 35–48. Auxter, T. Kant’s Moral Teleology (Macon: –––––, ‘Kant’s ethical commonwealth: Mercer University Press, 1982). the highest good as a social goal’, Banham, G., ‘Kant’s critique of right’, International Philosophical Quarterly 26 Kantian Review 6 (2002): 35–59. (1986): 23–32. –––––, Kant’s Practical Philosophy –––––, ‘War and resistance’, Journal of (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Social Philosophy 19 (1988): 37–50. Macmillan, 2003). –––––, Cosmopolitanism and Human –––––, ‘Publicity and provisional right’, Rights (Cardiff: University of Wales Politics and Ethics Review 3,1 (2007): Press, 2001). 73–89. –––––, ‘Privacy, respect and the virtues of –––––, ‘Kant’s moral theory’, British Journal reticence in Kant’, Kantian Review 15,2 for the History of Philosophy 15,3 (2010): 28–42. (2007): 581–594. Annas, J., ‘Personal love and Kantian ethics –––––, ‘Practical schematism, teleology and in Effi Briest’, Philosophy and Literature the unity of the Metaphysics of Morals’, 8 (1984): 15–31. in K. Goudeli et al. (eds) (2007), pp. 1–15. Ansbro, J. J., ‘Kant’s limitations on –––––, ‘New Work on Kant’s Doctrine of individual freedom’, The New Right’, British Journal for the History of Scholasticism 4 (1973): 88–99. Philosophy 16,3 (2011): 549–560.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Bailey, T., ‘Analysing the Good Will’, British –––––, ‘Kant’s two conceptions of the will in Journal for the History of Philosophy their political context’, in R. Beiner & 18,4 (2010): 635–662. J. W. Booth (eds) (1993), pp. 38–49. Baker, J., ‘Counting categorical imperatives’, Benson, P., ‘External freedom according to Kant-Studien 79 (1988): 389–406. Kant’, Columbia Law Review 87 (1987): Barnes, G., ‘In defence of Kant’s doctrine 559–579. of the highest good’, The Philosophical –––––, ‘Moral worth’, Philosophical Studies Forum 2 (1971): 446–458. 51 (1987): 365–382. Baron, M., ‘Remorse and agent regret’, Benton, R. J., Kant’s Second Critique Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1988): and the Problem of Transcendental 259–281. Arguments (The Hague: Martinus –––––, ‘Was Effi Briest a victim of Kantian Nijhoff, 1977). morality?’, Philosophy and Literature 12 –––––, ‘The transcendental argument in (1988): 95–113. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics –––––, Kantian Ethics Almost Without of Morals’, Journal of Value Inquiry 12 Apology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University (1978): 225–237. Press, 1995). –––––, ‘Kant’s categories of practical Baxley, A. M., ‘Does Kantian virtue reason as such’, Kant-Studien 71 (1980): amount to more than continence?’, 181–201. Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): Bielefeldt, H., ‘Autonomy and 559–586. republicanism: Immanuel Kant’s –––––, Kant’s Theory of Virtue (Cambridge: philosophy of freedom’, Political Theory Cambridge University Press, 2010). 25 (1997): 524–558. Baynes, K., ‘Kant on property rights and the –––––, ‘Towards a cosmopolitan framework social contract’, The Monist 72 (1989): of freedom’, Jahrbuch für Recht und 433–453. Ethik 5 (1997): 349–362. Beck, L. W., ‘Sir David Ross on duty and –––––, Symbolic Representation in Kant’s purpose in Kant’, Philosophy and Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Phenomenological Research 16 (1955): Cambridge University Press, 2003). 98–107. Booth, W. J., Interpreting the World: Kant’s –––––, ‘Apodictic imperatives’, Kant-Studien Philosophy of History and Politics (Toronto: 49 (1957): 7–24. University of Toronto Press, 1986). –––––, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Borges, M., ‘Physiology and the controlling Practical Reason (Chicago: University of of affects in Kant’s philosophy’, Kantian Chicago Press, 1960). Review 13,2 (2008): 46–66. –––––, ‘Kant and the right of revolution’, Bowie, N. E., ‘Aspects of Kant’s philosophy Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (1971): of law’, The Philosophical Forum 2 414–422. (1971): 469–478. –––––, ‘Five concepts of freedom in Kant’, Buchanan, A., ‘Categorical imperatives and in J. T. J. Szrednicki (ed.), Philosophical moral principles’, Philosophical Studies Analysis and Reconstruction (The 31 (1977): 249–260. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), Byrd, S., ‘Kant’s theory of punishment: pp. 35–51. deterrence in its threat, retributivist in

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

its execution’, Law and Philosophy 8 Cummiskey, D., ‘Kantian consequentialism’, (1989): 151–200. Ethics 100 (1990): 586–615. –––––, ‘Two models of justice’, Jahrbuch für –––––, Kantian Consequentialism (New Recht und Ethik 1 (1993): 45–68. York: Oxford University Press, 1996). –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of contract’, The Cox, J. G., The Will at the Crossroads: Southern Journal of Philosophy XXXVI A Reconstruction of Kant’s Moral (supplement) (1997): 131–153. Philosophy (Washington, D.C.: University Byrd, S. & Hruschka, J., Kant’s Doctrine Press of America, 1984). of Right: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cranor, N., ‘Kant’s respect-for-persons Cambridge University Press, 2010). principle’, International Studies in Campbell, J., ‘Kantian conceptions of Philosophy 12 (1983): 19–40. moral goodness’, Canadian Journal of Dahlstrom, D. O., ‘The natural right of Philosophy 13 (1983): 527–550. equal opportunity in Kant’s civil union’, Carnois, B., The Coherence of Kant’s Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 Doctrine of Freedom (Chicago: University (1985): 295–303. of Chicago Press, 1987). Davidovitch, A., ‘How to read Religion Carson, T., ‘Perpetual Peace: what Kant within the Limits of Reason Alone’, Kant- should have said’, Social Theory and Studien 85 (1994): 1–14. Practice 14 (1988): 173–214. Davis, K. R., ‘Kantian “publicity and Cavallar, G., Kant and the Theory and political justice”’, History of Philosophy Practice of International Right (Cardiff: Quarterly 8 (1991): 409–422. University of Wales Press, 1999). –––––, ‘Kant’s different “public” and the –––––, ‘Kant’s society of nations: free justice of publicity’, Kant-Studien 83 federation or world republic?’, Journal (1992): 170–184. of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): Darwall, S., ‘Two kinds of respect’, Ethics 103–122. 100 (1977): 588–615. –––––, ‘Kantian perspectives on democratic Dean, R., The Value of Humanity in peace: alternatives to Doyle’, Review Kant’s Moral Theory (Oxford: Oxford of International Studies 27 (2001): University Press, 2006). 229–248. Deligiorgi, K., Kant and the Culture of Chadwick, R. R., ‘The market for bodily Enlightenment (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, parts’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 2006). (1989): 129–139. Denis, L., ‘Kant on the wrongness of Cholbi, M. J., ‘Kant and the irrationality of “unnatural” sex’, History of Philosophy suicide’, History of Philosophy Quarterly Quarterly 16 (1999): 225–248. 17 (2000): 159–176. –––––, ‘Kant on the perfection of others’, Coble, K., ‘Kant’s dynamic theory of character’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 Kantian Review 7 (2003): 38–71. (1999): 21–41. Corlett, J. A., ‘Foundations of a Kantian –––––, Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself theory of punishment’, Southern Journal in Kant’s Moral Theory (London: of Philosophy 31 (1993): 263–284. Routledge, 2001). Covell, C., Kant and the Law of Peace –––––, ‘Kant’s conception of virtues’, in (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998). P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 505–537.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Humanity, obligation and the good –––––, The Form of Practical Knowledge will’, Kantian Review 15,1 (2010): (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University 118–141. Press, 2009). Dietrichson, P., ‘When is a maxim fully –––––, ‘Herman on moral literacy’, Kantian universalisable?’, Kant-Studien 55 (1964): Review 16,1 (2011): 17–31. 143–170. Engstrom, S. & Whiting, J. (eds), Dillon, R. S., ‘Kant on arrogance and self- Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: respect’, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Setting the Rethinking Happiness and Duty Compass: Essays by Women Philosophers (Cambridge: Cambridge University (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), Press, 1996). pp. 191–217. Fackenheim, E., ‘Kant and radical evil’, Dodson, K. E., ‘Kant’s perpetual peace: University of Toronto Quaterly 23 universal civil society or league of (1954): 439–453. states?’, Southwest Philosophical Studies –––––, ‘Kant’s concept of history’, Kant- 15 (1993): 1–9. Studien 48 (1956–7): 381–398. –––––, ‘Autonomy and authority in Kant’s Fahmy, M. S., ‘Active sympathetic “Rechtslehre”’, Political Theory 25 participation: reconsidering Kant’s duty (1997): 93–111. of sympathy’, Kantian Review 14,1 Donagan, A., ‘The structure of Kant’s (2009): 31–52. Metaphysics of Morals’, Topoi 4 (1985): Fenves, P. D., A Peculiar Fate (Ithaca, NY: 61–72. Cornell University Press, 2003). Doore, G., ‘Contradiction in the will’, Kant- –––––, Late Kant (London: Routledge, Studien 76 (1985): 138–151. 2003). Doyle, M.W., ‘Liberalism and international Finnis, J. M., ‘Legal enforcement of “duties relations’, in R. Beiner & J. W. Booth to oneself”: Kant vs. neo-Kantians’, (eds) (1993), pp. 173–204. Columbia Law Review 87 (1987): Duncan, A. R. C., Practical Reason and 433–456. Morality (London: Thomas Nelson & Flang, A. F., ‘Kant and the supreme Sons, 1957). proprietor: a response’, Kantian Review Easley, E. S., The War Over Perpetual 15,2 (2010), 78–89. Peace (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Flikschuch, K., ‘On Kant’s “Rechtslehre”’, 2004). European Journal of Philosophy 5 Edwards, J., ‘Egoism and formalism in the (1997): 50–73. development of Kant’s moral philosophy’, –––––, ‘Freedom and constraint in Kant’s Kant-Studien 91 (2000): 411–431. Metaphysical Elements of Justice’, Eisenberg, P., ‘Basic ethical categories History of Political Thought 20 (1999): of Kant’s Tugendlehre’, American 250–271. Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1966): –––––, Kant and Modern Political 255–269. Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge Ellis, E., Kant’s Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000). University Press, 2005). –––––, ‘Reason, right and revolution: Kant Engstrom, S., ‘Herman on mutual aid’, and Locke’, Philosophy and Public Affairs Ethics 96 (1986): 346–394. 36,4 (2008): 375–404.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kant’s kingdom of ends: Galston, W. A., ‘What is living and what metaphysical, not political’, in is dead in Kant’s practical philosophy’, J. Timmermann (ed.) (2009), pp. 119–139. in R. Beiner & J. W. Booth (eds) (1993), –––––, ‘Kant’s sovereignty dilemma: a pp. 207–223. contemporary analysis’, Journal of Galvin, R. F., ‘Does Kant’s psychology of Political Philosophy 18,4 (2010): morality need basic revision?’, Mind 100 469–493. (1991): 221–236. Fleischacker, S., ‘Kant’s theory of –––––, ‘Ethical Formalism: The punishment’, Kant-Studien 79 (1988): Contradiction in Conception Test’, 434–449. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8,4 Flynn, J. R., ‘The logic of Kant’s derivation (1991): 357–408. of freedom from reason’, Kant-Studien 77 –––––, ‘Rounding up the usual suspects: (1986): 441–464. varieties of Kantian constructivism in Formosa, P., ‘Kant on the highest moral– ethics’, The Philosophical Quarterly 61 physical good’, Kantian Review 15,1 (2011): 16–36. (2010): 1–36. Geiger, I., The Founding Act of Modern Forschner, M., ‘Über die verschiedenen Ethical Life. Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Bedeutungen des “Hangs zum Bösen”’, Moral and Political Philosophy (Stanford: in O. Höffe (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Die Stanford University Press, 2007). Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der –––––, ‘What is the use of the universal law bloßen Vernunft, in the series Klassiker formula of the categorical imperative?’, Auslegen (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, British Journal of the History of 2011), pp. 71–90. Philosophy 18,2 (2010): 271–296. Franceschet, A., Kant and Liberal –––––, ‘Rational feelings and moral agency’, Internationalism (New York: Palgrave Kantian Review 16,2 (2011): 283–308. Macmillan, 2002). Gelfert, A., ‘Kant on testimony’, British Franke, M. F. N., Global Limits: Immanuel Journal for the History of Philosophy Kant, International Relations, and 14,4 (2006): 627–652. Critique of World Politics (Albany, Genova, A. C., ‘Kant’s transcendental NY: SUNY Press, 2002). deduction of the moral law’, Kant- Freydberg, B., Imagination in Kant’s Critique Studien 69 (1978): 299–313. of Practical Reason (Bloomington: Indiana Gerrand, N., ‘The misuse of Kant in the University Press, 2005). debate about a market for human bodily Friedman, R. Z., ‘The importance and parts’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 function of Kant’s highest good’, Journal (1999): 59–67. of the History of Philosophy 22 (1984): Gilroy, J. M., ‘Making Public Choices’, 325–342. Kant-Studien 91 (2000): 44–72. Frierson, P., Freedom and Anthropology in Godlove, T. Jr., ‘Moral actions, moral lives’, Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 Cambridge University Press, 2003). (1987): 49–64. Gahringer, R. E., ‘The metaphysical aspect Gorner, P., ‘The place of punishment in of Kant’s moral philosophy’, Ethics XLIV Kant’s Rechtslehre’, Kantian Review 4 (1954): 277–291. (2000): 121–130.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Gregor, M., Laws of Freedom: A Study Philosophy and Phenomenological of Kant’s Method of Applying the Research 59 (1999): 593–624. Categorical Imperative in the ‘Metaphysik –––––, Kant’s Theory of Moral Motivation der Sitten’ (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000). 1963). Guyer, P., Kant and the Experience of –––––, ‘Kant on welfare legislation’, Logos 6 Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge (1985): 49–59. University Press, 1993). –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of property’, Review –––––, ‘The value of agency’, Ethics 106 of Metaphysics 41 (1988): 757–787. (1996): 404–423. –––––, ‘Kant’s approach to –––––, ‘The possibility of the categorical constitutionalism’, in A. S. Rosenbaum imperative’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (1998), (ed.), Constitutionalism (New York: pp. 215–248. Greenwood Press, 1988): pp. 69–87. –––––, ‘Life, liberty and property’, in D. –––––, ‘“Natural rights” in Kant’s Doctrine Hüning & B. Tuschling (eds), Recht, Staat of Right’, in T. O’Hagan (ed.), Revolution under Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & and Enlightenment in Europe (Aberdeen: Humboldt, 1998), pp. 273–292. University of Aberdeen Press, 1991): 23–29. –––––, ‘Morality of Law and Morality –––––, ‘Kant on obligation, rights and of Freedom’, in P. Guyer (2000), virtue’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/ pp. 129–171. Annual Review of Law and Ethics 1 –––––, Kant on Freedom, Law and (1993): 69–102. Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge –––––, ‘Leslie Mulholland on Kant’s University Press, 2000). Rehtslehre’, Dialogue 33 (1994): –––––, ‘Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: 693–700. The Place of Teleology in Kant’s Ethics’, Green, M. K., ‘Kant and moral self- Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002): deception’, Kant-Studien 83 (1992): 161–186. 148–169. –––––, ‘The derivation of the categorical Green, R. M., ‘The first formulation of imperative’, Harvard Review of the categorical imperative as literally Philosophy 10 (2002): 64–80. a “legislative” metaphor’, History of –––––, ‘Kant on the Theory and Practice of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 163–179. Autonomy’, in Kant’s System of Nature and Grenberg, J. M., ‘Feeling, desire and interest Freedom: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford in Kant’s theory of action’, Kant-Studien University Press, 2005), pp. 115–145. 92 (2001): 153–179. –––––, Kant’s Groundwork for the –––––, Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide Story of Dependence, Corruption and (London: Continuum, 2007). Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Harbison, W. G., ‘The good will’, Kant- Press, 2005). Studien 71 (1980): 47–59. Grey, T. C., ‘Serpents and doves: a note on Hare, J. E., The Moral Gap. Kantian Ethics, Kantian legal theory’, Columbia Law Human Limits and God’s Assistance Review 87 (1987): 580–591. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997). Guevara, D., ‘The impossibility of Hare, R. M., ‘Could Kant have been a supererogation in Kant’s moral theory’, utilitarian?’, Utilitas 5 (1993): 1–16.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Harris, C. E., Jr. ‘Kant, Nozick and the –––––, ‘Beneficence and self-love’, Social minimal state’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy and Policy 10 (1993): 1–23. Philosophy 10 (1979): 179–187. –––––, ‘Donagan’s Kant’, Ethics 104 (1993): Harris, N., ‘Kantian duties and immoral 22–52. agents’, Kant-Studien 83 (1992): –––––, ‘Kant on punishment’, Jahrbuch für 336–343. Recht und Ethik 5 (1997): 291–314. Heller, A., ‘Freedom and happiness in Kant’s –––––, ‘Kant on wrong-doing, desert, and political philosophy’, Graduate Faculty punishment’, Law and Philosophy 18 Philosophy Journal 13 (1990): 115–131. (1999): 407–441. Henrich, D., ‘The deduction of the moral –––––, Respect, Pluralism and Justice: law: the reasons for the obscurity of the Kantian Perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon final section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Press, 2000). Metaphysics of Morals’, in P. Guyer (ed.) –––––, ‘Hypothetical consent in Kantian (1998), pp. 303–342. constructivism’, Social Philosophy and Herman, B., ‘Leaving deontology behind’, in Policy 18,2 (2001): 300–329. B. Herman (1993), pp. 208–240. –––––, Human Welfare and Moral Worth: –––––, The Practice of Moral Judgment Kantian Perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002). Press, 1993). Hinman, L. M., ‘On the purity of our moral –––––, Moral Literacy (Cambridge, MA: motives’, Monist 66 (1983): 251–267. Harvard University Press, 2007). Hodgson, L.-P., ‘Kant on property rights and –––––, ‘Embracing Kant’s formalism’, the state’, Kantian Review 15,1 (2010): Kantian Review 16,1 (2011): 49–66. 57–87. Herrera, L., ‘Kant on the moral Triebfeder’, Höffe, O., ‘Retaliatory punishment as Kant-Studien 91 (2000): 395–410. a categorical imperative’, Rivista Henson, R., ‘What Kant might have said: Internazionale Filosofio del Diritto 66 moral worth and overdetermination of (1989): 633–658. dutiful action’, Philosophical Review 88 –––––, Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of (1979): 39–54. Law and Peace (Cambridge: Cambridge Heyd, D., ‘Beyond the call of duty in Kant’s University Press, 2006 [2001]). ethics’, Kant-Studien 71 (1980): 308–324. Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: –––––, ‘Moral and legal luck: Kant’s Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der reconciliation with practical contingency’, Rechtslehre, in the series Klassiker Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997): Auslegen (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 27–42. 1999). Hill, T. E. Jr., ‘Darwall on practical reason’, Hopton, T., ‘Kant’s two theories of law’, Ethics 96 (1986): 604–619. History of Political Thought 3 (1982): –––––, Autonomy and Self Respect 51–76. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Holtman, S. W., ‘A Kantian approach to 1991). prison reform’, Jahrbuch für Recht und –––––, Dignity and Practical Reason in Ethik 5 (1997): 315–31. Kant’s Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell –––––, ‘Toward social reform’, Utilitas 9 University Press, 1992). (1997): 3–21.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Kant, ideal theory and the justice of Karatani, K., Transcritique: On Kant and exclusionary zoning’, Ethics 110 (1999): Marx (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 320–358. 2003). –––––, ‘Kantian justice and poverty relief’, Kaufman, A., Welfare in the Kantian State Kant-Studien 95 (2004): 86–106. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999). –––––, ‘Autonomy and the kingdom of ends’, Kerstein, S. J., Kant’s Search for the in T. E. Hill (ed.) (2009), pp. 102–18. Supreme Principle of Morality Hudson, H., ‘Wille, Willkür, and the (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, imputability of immoral actions’, Kant- 2002). Studien 82 (1991): 179–196. Kersting, W., Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Hutchings, K., Kant, Critique and Politics Immanuel Kants Rechts- und (London: Routledge, 1996). Staatsphilosophie (Paderborn: mentis, Hutchings, P., Kant on Absolute Value 2007). (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1972). Kleingeld, P., ‘Kantian patriotism’, Hruschka, J., ‘The permissive law of Philosophy and Public Affairs 29,4 practical reason in Kant’s Metaphysics of (2000): 313–341. Morals’, Law and Philosophy 23 (2004): –––––, ‘Approaching perpetual peace: Kant’s 45–72. defence of a league of states and his ideal James, D. N., ‘Suicide and Stoic ethics in of a world federation’, The European the Doctrine of Virtue’, Kant-Studien 90 Journal of Philosophy 12,3 (2004): (1999): 40–58. 304–325. Jensen, H., ‘Kant and moral integrity’, –––––, Kant and Cosmopolitanism Philosophical Studies 57 (1989): (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 193–205. 2011). Jeske, D., ‘Perfection, happiness, and Klimchuck, D., ‘Three accounts of respect duties to self’, American Philosophical for persons in Kant’s ethics’, Kantian Quarterly 33 (1996): 263–276. Review 7 (2003): 38–61. Johnson, G., ‘The tree of melancholy: Kant Korsgaard, C. M., ‘Kant’s formula of on philosophy and enthusiasm’, in C. universal law’, Pacific Philosophical Firestone & S. Palmquist (eds) (2006), Quarterly (1985): 24–47. pp. 43–61. –––––, Creating the Kingdom of Ends Johnson, R., ‘Kant’s conception of merit’, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 1996). (1996): 310–334. –––––, The Sources of Normativity, ed. –––––, ‘Kant’s conception of virtue’, O. O’Neill (Cambridge: Cambridge Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997): University Press, 1996). 365–387. –––––, Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity Jones, H. E., Kant’s Principle of Personality and Integrity (Oxford: Oxford University (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, Press, 2009). 1971). Kuehn, M., ‘Kant’s transcendental deduction Jones, W. T., Morality and Freedom in the of God’s existence as a postulate of pure Philosophy of Kant (Oxford: Oxford practical reason’, Kant-Studien 76,2 University Press, 1940). (1985): 152–169.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Laurson, J. C., ‘Kantian politics’, Political –––––, ‘Kant’s rejection of the argument Theory 14 (1986): 584–603. of Groundwork III’, Kant-Studien 73,2 LeBar, M., ‘Kant on welfare’, Canadian (1982): 169–190. Journal of Philosophy 29 (1999): 225–250. –––––, ‘The objection of circularity in Lind, D., ‘Kant on capital punishment’, Groundwork III’, Kant-Studien 76 Journal of Philosophical Research 19 (1985): 28–42. (1994): 61–74. McCarty, R., ‘The limits of Kantian duty, Linden, H. V. D., Kantian Ethics and and beyond’, American Philosophical Socialism (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988). Quarterly 26 (1991): 65–81. Lloyd, T. D., ‘Kantian and utilitarian –––––, ‘Moral conflicts in Kantian ethics’, democracy’, Canadian Journal of History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 Philosophy 10 (1980): 395–413. (1991): 65–79. Lo, P. C., Treating Persons as Ends –––––, ‘Kantian moral motivation and (Lanham, MD/New York: University the feeling of respect’, Journal of the Press of America, 1987). History of Philosophy 31 (1993): Louden, R. B., ‘Kant’s virtue ethics’, 421–435. Philosophy 61 (1986): 473–489. –––––, ‘Motivation and moral choice in –––––, Kant’s Impure Ethics (Oxford: Kant’s theory of rational agency’, Kant- Clarendon Press, 2000). Studien 85 (1994): 15–31. Lukow, P., ‘The fact of reason’, Kant-Studien –––––, Kant’s Theory of Action (Oxford: 84 (1993): 204–221. Clarendon Press, 2009). MacBeath, A. M., ‘Kant on moral feeling’, McKenzie, N., ‘The primacy of practical Kant-Studien 64 (1973): 283–314. reason in Kant’s system’, Idealistic Studies Mahon, J. E., ‘Kant and the perfect duty 15 (1985): 199–215. to others not to lie’, British Journal for Merle, J. C., ‘A Kantian critique of Kant’s the History of Philosophy 14,4 (2006): theory of punishment’, Law and 653–686. Philosophy 19 (2000): 311–338. Marina, J., ‘Making sense of Kant’s highest –––––, ‘A Kantian argument for a duty good’, Kant-Studien 91,3 (2000): to donate one’s own organs: a reply to 329–355. Nicole Gerrand’, Journal of Applied Martin, C., ‘Emotion in Kant’s moral Philosophy 17 (2000): 93–101. philosophy’, Philosophical Studies 27 Meyer, M., ‘Kant’s concept of dignity and (1980): 16–28. modern political thought’, History of Massey, S. J., ‘Kant on self-respect’, Journal European Ideas 8 (1987): 319–332. of the History of Philosophy 21 (1983): Michalson, G. E., Jr., ‘Moral regeneration 57–73. and virtue in Kant’, Religious Studies 25 May, T. G., ‘Kant the liberal, Kant (1989); 259–270. the anarchist’, Southern Journal of –––––, Fallen Freedom: Kant on 28 (1990): 525–538. Evil and Moral Regeneration (Cambridge: McCarthy, M., ‘Kant’s application of Cambridge University Press, 1990). the analytic/synthetic distinction to Mikkola, M., ‘Kant on moral agency and imperatives’, Dialogue 18 (1979): women’s nature’, Kantian Review 16,1 373–391. (2011): 89–111.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Minogue, K., ‘Locke, Kant, and the Munzel, G. F., Kant’s Conception of Moral foundations of liberalism’, in Character (Chicago: University of M. P. Thompson (ed.), John Locke und Chicago Press, 1999). Immanuel Kant (Berlin: Duncker & Munzer, S. R., ‘Kant and property rights Humboldt, 1991), pp. 269–283. in body parts’, Canadian Journal of Moore, A. W., Noble in Reason, Infinite Law and Jurisprudence 6 (1993): in Faculty: Themes and Variations in 319–341. Kant’s Moral and Religious Philosophy Nakhnikian, G., ‘Kantian universalizability (London: Routledge, 2003). and the objectivity of moral judgments’, Morgan, D. & Banham, G. (eds), in N. Potter & M. Timmons (eds), Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Morality and Universality (Dordrecht: Future (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave D. Reidel, 1985), pp. 187–233. Macmillan, 2007). –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of hypothetical Mulholland, L., ‘Kant: on willing maxims imperatives’, Kant-Studien 83 (1992): to become laws of nature’, Dialogue 17 21–49. (1978): 95–105. Neculau, R., ‘Does Kant’s rejection of the –––––, ‘Kant on war and international right to resist make him a legal rigorist?’, justice’, Kant-Studien 78 (1987): 25–41. Kantian Review 13,2 (2008): 107–40. –––––, Kant’s System of Rights (New York: Negretto, G. L., ‘Kant and the illusion of Columbia University Press, 1990). collective security’, Journal of International –––––, ‘The difference between private and Affairs 46,2 (1993): 501–523. public law’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik Niesen, P., Kants Theorie der Redefreiheit 1 (1993): 113–158. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008). Murphy, J. G., ‘The highest good as content Noggle, R., ‘Kantian respect and particular for Kant’s ethical formalism: Beck versus persons’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Silber’, Kant-Studien 56 (1965–66): 29 (1999): 449–477. 102–110. Nuyen, A. T., ‘Sense, passions and morals –––––, Kant: The Philosophy of Right in Hume and Kant’, Kant-Studien 82 (London: Macmillan, 1970). (1991): 42–62. –––––, ‘Moral death: a Kantian essay on –––––, ‘Counting the formulas of the psychopathy’, Ethics 82 (1972): 284–298. categorical imperative’, History of –––––, ‘Hume and Kant on the social Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 37–48. contract’, Philosophical Studies 33 –––––, ‘The heart of the Kantian moral (1978): 65–79. agent’, American Catholic Quarterly 69 –––––, ‘Does Kant have a theory of (1995): 51–62. punishment?’, Columbia Law Review 87 O’Neill, O., Constructions of Reason: (1987): 509–532. Explorations of Kant’s Practical Muchnik, P., Kant’s Theory of Evil Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, University Press, 1990). 2009). –––––, ‘Vindicating reason’, in P. Guyer (ed.) Muthu, S., ‘Justice and foreigners: Kant’s (1992), pp. 280–308. cosmopolitan right’, Constellations 7 –––––, ‘Kant’s virtues’, in R. Crisp (ed.), (2000): 23–45. How Should One Live? Essays on the

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Virtues (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), –––––, ‘Kant on friendship’, Proceedings of pp. 77–97. the British Academy 42 (1956): 45–66. –––––, ‘Political liberalism and public –––––, ‘Conscience and Kant’, Kant-Studien reason’, The Philosophical Review 106 70 (1979): 329–351. (1998): 411–428. Pippin, R. B., ‘Mine and thine? The –––––, Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Kantian state’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), Cambridge University Press, 2000). pp. 416–446. –––––, ‘Instituting principles: between duty Pogge, T. W., ‘The Kantian interpretation and action’, in M. Timmons (ed.) (2002), of justice as fairness’, Zeitschrift für pp. 331–348. philosophische Forschung 35 (1981): –––––, ‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’, 47–65. in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge –––––, ‘Kant’s theory of justice’, Kant- Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Studien 79 (1988): 407–433. Cambridge University Press, 2003), –––––, ‘Is Kant’s Rechtslehre pp. 347–367. comprehensive?’, Southern Journal of Nell, O., Acting on Principle: An Essay on Philosophy XXXVI, Supplement (1997): Kantian Ethics (New York: Columbia 161–187. University Press, 1975). Potter, N., ‘How to apply the categorical Onof, C., ‘A framework for the derivation and imperative’, Philosophia 5 (1975): reconstruction of the categorical imperative’, 395–416. Kant-Studien 89 (1998): 410–427. –––––, ‘Kant on ends that are at the same –––––, ‘Moral worth and inclinations time duties’, Pacific Philosophical in Kantian ethics’, Kant Studies Quarterly 66 (1985): 78–92. Online (2011): 1–46 http://www. –––––, ‘What is wrong with Kant’s four kantstudiesonline.net/KantStudiesOnline_ examples?’, Journal of Philosophical Recent_files/OnofChristian00711_1.pdf Research 18 (1993): 213–229. Orend, B., ‘Kant’s just war theory’, Journal –––––, ‘Kant on obligation and motivation of the History of Philosophy 37 (1999): in law and ethics’, Jahrbuch für Recht 323–355. und Ethik 2 (1994): 95–112. Packer, M., ‘The highest good in Kant’s –––––, ‘Kant and the moral worth of psychology of motivation’, Idealistic actions’, Southern Journal of Philosophy Studies 13 (1988): 110–119. 34 (1996): 225–241. –––––, ‘Kant on desire and moral pleasure’, Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Journal of the History of Ideas 50,3 Oxford University Press, 1971). (1989): 429–442. –––––, ‘Kantian constructivism in moral Palmquist, S., ‘Does Kant reduce religion theory’, The Journal of Philosophy 77 to morality?’, Kant-Studien 83 (1992): (1980): 515–572. 129–148. Reath, A., ‘The categorical imperative Parfit, D., On What Matters, 2 vols. and Kant’s conception of practical (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011). rationality’, Monist 72 (1989): 185–202. Paton, H. J., The Categorical Imperative –––––, ‘Kant’s principles for the imputation (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania of consequences’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Press, 1947). Ethik 2 (1994): 213–229.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

–––––, ‘Value and law in Kant’s moral Samet, I., ‘The form of evil’, Kantian Review theory’, Ethics 114 (2003): 127–155. 14: 2 (2010): 93–117. –––––, Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Schaller, W. E., ‘Kant on virtue and moral Moral Theory: Selected Essays (Oxford: worth’, Southern Journal of Philosophy Clarendon Press, 2006). 25 (1987): 559–573. –––––, ‘Will, obligatory ends and the –––––, ‘Kant’s architectonic of duties’, completion of practical reason: comments Philosophy and Phenomenological on Barbara Herman’s Moral Literacy’, Research 48 (1987): 299–314. Kantian Review 16,1 (2011): 1–15. –––––, ‘Should Kantians worry about moral Reid, J., ‘Morality and sensibility in Kant’, worth?’, Dialogue 32 (1993): 25–40. Kantian Review 8 (2004): 89–114. –––––, ‘Kant on right and moral right’, Richards, D. A., Jr., ‘Kantian ethics and the Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 harm principle’, Columbia Law Review (2000): 321–342. 87 (1987): 457–471. Scheid, D., ‘Kant’s retributivism’, Ethics 93 Riley, P., Kant’s Political Philosophy (1983): 262–282. (Totona: Rowman & Littlefield, 1983). –––––, ‘Kant’s retributivism again’, Archiv Ripstein, A., ‘Authority and coercion’, für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 72 Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (2004): (1986): 224–230. 2–35. Schwarzchild, S. S., ‘Kantianism on the –––––, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and death penalty (and related social Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: problems)’, Archiv für Rechts- und Harvard University Press, 2009). Sozialphilosophie 71 (1985): 343–372. Rollin, B., ‘There is only one categorical Scutt, M. Z., ‘Kant’s moral theology’, British imperative’, Kant-Studien 67 (1976): 60–72. Journal for the History of Philosophy Rosen, A. D., Kant’s Theory of Justice (Ithaca, 18,4 (2010): 611–634. NY: Cornell University Press, 1993). Seckar, B. ‘The appearance of deontology Ross, D., Kant’s Ethical Theory (Oxford: in contemporary Kantianism’, Journal Clarendon Press, 1954). of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1999): Rossi, P., The Social Authority of Reason. 43–66. Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil, and the Sedgwick, S., ‘On the relation of pure Destiny of Humankind (Albany, NY: reason to content’, Philosophy and SUNY Press, 2005). Phenomenological Research 49 (1988): Rossvaer, V., Kant’s Moral Philosophy 59–80. (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1979). –––––, ‘On lying and the role of content in Rumsey, J. P., ‘The development of character Kant’s ethics’, Kant-Studien 82 (1991): in Kantian moral theory’, Journal of the 42–62. History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 247–265. –––––, ‘“Letting the phenomena in”: how –––––, ‘Agency, human nature, and character Herman’s Kantianism does and does not in Kantian theory’, Journal of Value answer the empty formalism critique’, Inquiry 24 (1990): 109–121. Kantian Review 16,1 (2011): 33–47. Saner H., Kant’s Political Thought, trans. Seidler, V. J., Kant, Respect, and Injustice E. B. Ashton (Chicago: University of (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Chicago Press, 1973). 1986).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Seel, G., ‘How does Kant justify the –––––, ‘The moral good and the natural universal objective validity of the law good in Kant’s ethics’, Review of of right?’, International Journal of Metaphysics 36 (1982): 397–438. Philosophical Studies 17,1 (2009): 71–94. –––––, Kant’s Ethics: The Good, Freedom Shell, S. M., The Rights of Reason (Toronto: and the Will (Berlin/New York: de University of Toronto Press, 1980). Gruyter, 2012) –––––, The Embodiment of Reason: Kant Simmons, K., ‘Kant on moral worth’, on Spirit, Generation, and Community History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1989): 85–100. 1996). Singer, M. G., ‘The categorical imperative’, –––––, ‘Kant on punishment’, Kantian The Philosophical Review 63 (1954): Review 1 (1997): 343–372. 577–591. –––––, Kant and the Limits of Autonomy –––––, Generalization in Ethics (New York: (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Alfred A. Knopf, 1961). Press, 2009). –––––, ‘Reconstructing the Groundwork’, Sherman, N., ‘Reasons and feelings in Ethics 93 (1983): 566–578. Kantian morality’, Philosophy and Skorpen, E., ‘Making sense of Kant’s third Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): example from the Groundwork of the 369–377. Metaphysics of Morals’, Kant-Studien 72 –––––, Making A Necessity of Virtue: (1981): 415–429. Aristotle and Kant on Virtue (Cambridge: Sorenson, K., ‘Kant’s taxonomy of the Cambridge University Press, 1997). emotions’, Kantian Review 6 (2002): –––––, ‘Concrete Kantian respect’, Social 109–128. Philosophy and Policy 15 (1998): Sneddon, A., ‘A new Kantian response to 119–148. maxim–fiddling’, Kantian Review 16,1 Silber J. R., ‘The Copernican revolution (2011): 67–88. in ethics: the good reexamined’, Kant- Stark, C. A., ‘The rationality of valuing Studien 51 (1959): 85–101. oneself’, Journal of the History of –––––, ‘Kant’s conception of the highest Philosophy 35 (1997): 65–82. good as immanent and transcendent’, Stern, D. S., ‘Autonomy and political The Philosophical Review 68 (1959): obligation in Kant’, Southern Journal of 469–492. Philosophy 29 (1991): 127–148. –––––, ‘The metaphysical importance of Stern, P., ‘The problem of history and the highest good as the canon of pure temporality in Kantian ethics’, Kant- reason in Kant’s moral philosophy’, Texas Studien 78 (1986): 504–545. Studies in Language and Literature 1 Stratton–Lake, P., ‘Formulating categorical (1959): 233–244. imperatives’, Kant-Studien 83 (1993): –––––, ‘The importance of the highest good 317–340. in Kant’s ethics’, Ethics 73 (1962–3): –––––, Kant, Duty and Moral Worth 179–197. (London: Routledge, 2000). –––––, ‘Procedural formalism in Kant’s Stevens, R. P., Kant on Moral Practice ethics’, Review of Metaphysics 28 (1974): (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 197–236. 1981).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Sutch, P., ‘Kantians and cosmopolitans’, Tunick, M., ‘Is Kant a retributivist?’, History Kantian Review 4 (2000): of Political Thought 17 (1996): 60–78. 98–120. Uleman, J., ‘On Kant, infanticide, and Sullivan, R. J., Immanuel Kant’s Moral finding oneself in a state of nature’, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung University Press, 1989). 54 (2000): 173–195. –––––, ‘The positive role of prudence in the Varden, H., ‘Kant’s non-voluntarist virtuous life’, Jahrbuch für Recht und conception of political obligations: Ethik 5 (1997): 461–470. why justice is impossible in the state of –––––, ‘How Bernard Williams constructed nature’, Kantian Review 13,2 (2008): his critique of Kant’s moral theory’, 1–45. Kantian Review 3 (1999): 106–113. Velkley, R. L., Freedom and the End of Surprenant, C. W., ‘Cultivating virtue: moral Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago progress and the Kantian state’, Kantian Press, 1989). Review 12 (2007): 90–112. Verhaegh, M., ‘Property by agreement: Swoyer, C., ‘Kantian derivations’, Canadian interpreting Kant’s account of right’, Journal of Philosophy 13 (1989): 409–431. British Journal for the History of Taylor, C., ‘Kant’s theory of freedom’, Philosophy 14,4 (2006): 687–718. in J. N. Gray & Z. Pelczynski (eds), Verweyen, H., ‘Social contract among Conceptions of Liberty in Political devils’, Idealistic Studies 26 (1996): Philosophy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 189–202. 1984), pp. 100–121. Voeller, C., The Metaphysics of the Moral Téson, F., ‘The Kantian theory of Law: Kant’s Deduction of Freedom (New international law’, Columbia Law Review York: Routledge, 2001). 92 (1992): 53–102. Wallace, R. J., Normativity and the Will: Timmermann, J., Kant’s Groundwork of the Selected Essays on Moral Psychology Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary and Practical Reason (Clarendon Press: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Oxford and New York, 2006). 2007). Ward, A., ‘On Kant’s defence of moral –––––, ‘Acting from duty: inclination, reason freedom’, History of Philosophy and moral worth’, in J. Timmermann Quarterly 8 (1991): 373–386. (ed.) (2009), pp. 45–62. Watson, S. H., ‘Kant on autonomy, the ends of Timmons, M., ‘Contradictions and the humanity, and the possibility of morality’, categorical imperative’, Archiv für Kant-Studien 77 (1986): 165–182. Geschichte der Philosophie 66 (1984): Weinrib, E. J., ‘Law as a Kantian idea of 504–545. reason’, Columbia Law Review 87,3 –––––, ‘Kant on the possibility of moral (1987): 472–508. motivation’, Southern Journal of Weinstock, D. M., ‘Natural law and 23 (1985): 377–398. reason in Kant’s political philosophy’, –––––, ‘Decision procedures, moral criteria, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 and the problem of relevant descriptions (1996): 389–411. in Kant’s ethics’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Westphal, K. R., ‘Kant on the state, law, Ethik 5 (1997): 389–417. and obedience to authority in the alleged

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

“anti-revolutionary” writings’, Journal –––––, ‘Kant, Rawls, Habermas and the of Philosophical Research 17 (1991/2): metaphysics of justice’, Kantian Review 3 377–420. (1999): 1–17. –––––, ‘Republicanism, despotism, and –––––, Kant’s Critique of Hobbes (Cardiff: obedience to the state’, Jahrbuch für University of Wales Press, 2003). Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law –––––, ‘Towards a Kantian theory of and Ethics 1 (1993): 263–281. international distributive justice’, Kantian –––––, ‘How “full” is Kant’s categorical Review 15,2 (2010): 43–77. imperative?’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Williams, T. C., The Concept of the Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics Categorical Imperative (Oxford: 3 (1995): 465–509. Clarendon Press, 1968). ––––– ‘Do Kant’s principles justify property Wilson, H., Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology: or usufruct?’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Its Origin, Meaning and Critical Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics Significance (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 5 (1997): 141–194. 2006). Wiggins, D., ‘Categorical requirements: Kant Wolff, R. P., The Autonomy of Reason (New and Hume on the idea of duty’, Monist York: Harper & Row, 1973). 74 (1991): 83–106. Wood, A., Kant’s Moral Religion (Ithaca, Wike, V. S., ‘Metaphysical foundations NY: Cornell University Press, 1970). of morality in Kant’, Journal of Value –––––, ‘The emptiness of the moral will’, Inquiry 17 (1983): 225–234. The Monist 72 (1989): 454–483. –––––, ‘Does Kant’s ethics require that the –––––, ‘Unsocial sociability: the moral law be the sole determining ground anthropological basis of Kantian of the will?’, Journal of Value Inquiry 27 ethics’, Philosophical Topics 19 (1991): (1993): 85–92. 325–351. –––––, Kant on Happiness in Ethics (Albany, –––––, Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: NY: SUNY Press, 1994). Cambridge University Press, 1999). Willaschek, M., ‘Why the Doctrine of Right –––––, ‘The supreme principle of morality’, does not belong in the Metaphysics of in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), pp. 342–380. Morals’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/ –––––, Kantian Ethics (Cambridge: Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5 Cambridge University Press, 2008). (1997): 205–227. Wolff, R. W., The Autonomy of Reason –––––, ‘Right and coercion. Can Kant’s (New York: Harper & Row, 1973). conception of right be derived from his Yost, B. S., ‘Kant’s justification of the death moral theory?’, International Journal penalty reconsidered’, Kantian Review of Philosophical Studies 17,1 (2009): 15,2 (2010): 1–27. 49–70. Yovel, Y., Kant and the Philosophy of Williams, B., ‘Internal and external reasons’, History (Princeton: Princeton University in B. Williams (1982), pp. 101–113. Press, 1980). –––––, Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge Ypi, L., ‘Natura Daedala Rerum? On the University Press, 1982). justification of historical progress in Williams, H., Kant’s Political Philosophy Kant’s Guarantee of Perpetual Peace’, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983). Kantian Review 14,2 (2010): 118–148.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Zeldin, M. B., ‘The summum bonum, the Cannon, J., ‘The moral value of artistic moral law, and the existence of God’, beauty in Kant’, Kantian Review 16,1 Kant-Studien 62 (1971): 43–54. (2011): 113–126. –––––, ‘Reply to Paul Guyer’, Kantian Review 16,1 (2011): 135–139. Caranti, L., ‘Logical purposiveness and the 9. Kant’s Third Critique, principle of taste’, Kant-Studien 96,3 Aesthetics and Teleology (2005): 364–374. Cassirer, H. W., A Commentary on Kant’s Allison, H. E., Kant’s Theory of Taste Critique of Judgment (London: Methuen, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938). 2001). Cheatam, M. A., Kant, Art, and Art History –––––, ‘Kant’s antinomy of teleological (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, judgment’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 2001). 30 (supplement) (1992): 25–42. Chignell, A., ‘Beauty as a symbol of –––––, ‘Reflective judgment and the natural systematicity’, British Journal of application of logic to nature’, in Aesthetics 46,4 (2006): 406–415. H. J. Glock (ed.) (2003), pp. 169–184. Cohen, T., ‘Three problems in Kant’s Banham, G., Kant and the Ends of aesthetics’, British Journal of Aesthetics Aesthetics (London: Macmillan, 2000). 42 (2002): 1–12. Baxley, A. M., ‘The practical significance of Coleman, F. J., The Harmony of Reason: A taste in Kant’s Critique of Judgment’, The Study in Kant’s Aesthetics (Pittsburgh: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism University of Pittsburgh Press, 1974). 63,1 (2005): 33–45. Crawford, D. W., Kant’s Aesthetic Theory Bernstein, J., The Fate of Art (Cambridge: (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, Polity Press, 1992). 1974). Breitenbach, A., ‘Teleology and biology: a Crowther, P., ‘Fundamental ontology and Kantian perspective’, Kant Yearbook 1 transcendental beauty: an approach (2009): 31–56. to Kant’s aesthetics’, Kant-Studien 76 Brittan, G., Jr., ‘Systematicity and objectivity (1985): 55–71. in the third Critique’, Southern Journal of –––––, ‘The Claims of Perfection’, Philosophy 30 (1990): 167–186. International Philosophical Quarterly 26 Burch, R., ‘Kant’s theory of beauty as (1986): 61–74. ideal art’, in G. Dickie & R. J. Sclafini –––––, The Kantian Sublime: From Morality (eds), Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology to Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989). (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1977), Dowling, C., ‘Zangwill, moderate formalism pp. 688–703. and another look at Kant’s aesthetic’, Burnham, D., An Introduction to Kant’s Kantian Review 15,2 (2010): 90–117. Critique of Judgment (Edinburgh: Düsing, K., ‘Beauty as the transition from University of Edinburgh Press, 2000). nature to freedom in Kant’s Critique of Butts, R. E., ‘Teleology and scientific method Judgment’, Noûs 24 (1990): 79–92. in Kant’s Critique of Judgment’, Noûs 24 Duve, T. D., Kant after Duchamp (1990): 1–16. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Elliott, R. K., ‘The unity of Kant’s “Critique –––––, ‘Two kinds of mechanical of Aesthetic Judgment” ’, British Journal inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle’, of Aesthetics 8,3 (1968): 244–259. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 Fisher, J. & Maitland, J., ‘The subjectivist (2004): 33–65. turn in aesthetics’, Review of Metaphysics Gracyk, T. A., ‘Sublimity, ugliness and 27 (1974): 726–751. formlessness in Kant’s aesthetic theory’, Fricke, C., ‘Explaining the inexplicable: the The Journal of Aesthetics and Art hypotheses of the faculty of reflective Criticism 45,1 (1986): 49–56. judgment in Kant’s third Critique’, Noûs Guyer, P., ‘Formalism and the theory of 24 (1990): 45–62. expression in Kant’s aesthetics’, Kant- Geiger, I., ‘Is teleological judgment (still) Studien 68 (1977): 46–70. necessary?’, British Journal for the History –––––, ‘Disinterestedness and desire in of Philosophy 17,3 (2009): 533–566. Kant’s aesthetics’, The Journal of –––––, ‘Transcendental idealism in the third Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1978): Critique’, in D. Schulting & J. Verburgt 580–603. (eds) (2011), pp. 71–89. –––––, Kant and the Claims of Taste, Genova, A. C., ‘Kant’s complex problem second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge of reflective judgment’, Review of University Press, (1997 [1979]). Metaphysics 23,3 (1970): 452–480. –––––, ‘Kant’s distinction between the –––––, ‘Kant’s transcendental deduction beautiful and the sublime’, Review of of aesthetical judgments’, Journal of Metaphysics 35 (1982): 769–773. Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30,4 (1972): –––––, ‘Autonomy and integrity in Kant’s 459–475. aesthetics’, The Monist 66 (1983): 67–88. Gibbons, S., Kant’s Theory of the Imagination –––––, ‘Feeling and freedom: Kant on (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994). aesthetics and morality’, The Journal of Ginsborg, H., ‘Kant on aesthetic and Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (1990): biological purposiveness’, in A. Reath 137–146. et al. (eds), Reclaiming the History of –––––, ‘Kant’s conception of fine art’, The Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 Press, 1987), pp. 329–360. (1994): 175–185. –––––, The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory –––––, ‘Free and adherent beauty: a modest of Cognition (New York: Garland, 1990). proposal’, British Journal of Aesthetics 42 –––––, ‘On the key to Kant’s critique of (2002): 357–366. taste’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly –––––, ‘Beauty, systematicity, and the highest 72,4 (1991): 290–313. good’, Inquiry 46 (2003): 195–214. –––––, ‘Lawfulness without a law: Kant –––––, Values of Beauty (Cambridge: on the free play of imagination’, Cambridge University Press, 2005). Philosophical Studies 25 (1997): 37–81. –––––, ‘Kant’s ambitions in the third –––––, ‘Kant on understanding organisms’, Critique’, in P. Guyer (ed.) (2006), in E. Watkins (ed.) (2001), p. 231–258. pp. 538–587. –––––, ‘Aesthetic judging and the –––––, ‘Genius and taste: a response to intentionality of pleasure’, Inquiry 46,2 Joseph Cannon’, Kantian Review 16,1 (2003): 164–181. (2011): 127–134.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Henrich, D., Aesthetic Judgment and the MacMillan, C., ‘Kant’s deduction of pure Moral Image of the World (Stanford: aesthetic judgments’, Kant-Studien 76 Stanford University Press, 1992). (1985): 43–54. Hund, W. B., ‘The sublime and God in Macmillan, R. A. C., The Crowning Phase Kant’s Critique of Judgment’, New of the Critical Philosophy (London: Scholasticism 57 (1983): 42–70. Macmillan, 1912). Johnson, M. L., ‘Kant’s unified theory of Maitland, J., ‘Two senses of necessity in beauty’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Kant’s aesthetic theory’, British Journal of Criticism 38 (1978): 167–178. Aesthetics 16,4 (1976): 347–353. Kemal, S., ‘Aesthetic necessity’, Kant-Studien Makkreel, R. A., ‘Imagination and 74 (1983): 176–205. temporality in Kant’s theory of the –––––, Kant and Fine Art (Oxford: sublime’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Clarendon Press, 1986). Criticism 42 (1984): 303–315. –––––, Kant’s Aesthetic Theory: An –––––, Imagination and Interpretation in Introduction (New York: St. Martin’s Kant (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992). Press, 1990). Kirwan, J., The Aesthetic in Kant (London: –––––, ‘Regulative and reflective uses of Continuum, 2004). purposiveness in Kant’, Southern Journal Kolb, D., ‘Kant, teleology, and evolution’, of Philosophy 30 (supplement) (1991): Synthese 91 (1992): 9–28. 49–63. Kraft, M., ‘Kant’s theory of teleology’, Malaband, P., ‘Understanding Kant’s International Philosophical Quarterly 22 distinction between free and dependent (1982): 41–49. beauty’, The Philosophical Quarterly 52 Kreines, J., ‘The inexplicability of Kant’s (2002): 66–81. Naturzweck’, Archiv für Geschichte der Matthews, P., ‘Kant’s sublime: a form of Philosophie 87,3 (2005): 270–311. pure aesthetic reflective judgment’, The Kuhns, R., ‘That Kant did not complete Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 his argument concerning the relation (1996): 165–179. of art to morality and how it might be McCloskey, M., Kant’s Aesthetic (Albany, completed’, Idealistic Studies 5 (1975): NY: SUNY Press, 1987). 190–206. McFarland, J. D., Kant’s Concept of Kulenkampff, J., ‘The objectivity of taste: Teleology (Edinburgh: University of Hume and Kant’, Noûs 24 (1990): Edinburgh Press, 1970). 93–110. McLaughlin, P., Kant’s Critique of Teleology Lazaroff, A., ‘The Kantian sublime: in Biological Explanation (Lewiston: aesthetic judgment and religious feeling’, Edwin Mellen Press, 1990). Kant-Studien 71 (1980): 202–220. Neville, M., ‘Kant’s characterization of Longuenesse, B., ‘Kant’s theory of judgment, aesthetic experience’, The Journal of and judgments of taste’, Inquiry 46,2 Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (1974): (2003): 146–163. 502–524. Lyotard, J. F., Lessons on the Analytic of the Nuzzo, A., Kant and the Unity of Reason Sublime (Stanford: Stanford University (West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, Press, 1994 [1991]). 2005).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

O’Farrell, F., ‘Problems of Kant’s aesthetics’, Savile, A., ‘Objectivity in aesthetic judgment: Gregorianum 57 (1976): 409–458. Eva Schaper on Kant’, British Journal of Pillow, K., Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Aesthetics 21 (1981): 363–369. Reflection in Kant and Hegel (Cambridge –––––, Kantian Aesthetics Pursued MA: MIT Press, 2000). (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Pippin, R. B., ‘The significance of taste: 1993). Kant, aesthetic and reflective judgment’, Scarre, G., ‘Kant on free and dependent Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 beauty’, British Journal of Aesthetics 21 (1996): 549–569. (1981): 351–362. Reed, A., ‘The debt of disinterest: Kant’s Schaper, E., ‘The Kantian “as-if” and its critique of music’, Modern Language relevance for aesthetics’, Proceedings of the Notes 95 (1980): 563–584. Aristotelian Society 65 (1964–5): 219–234. Rind, M., ‘What is claimed in a Kantian –––––, ‘Kant on imagination’, The judgment of taste?’, Journal of the Philosophical Forum 2 (1971): 430–445. History of Philosophy 38,1 (2000): –––––, Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics 63–85. (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh –––––, ‘Can Kant’s deduction of judgments Press, 1979). of taste be saved?’, Archiv für Geschichte Shier, D., ‘Why Kant finds nothing ugly’, der Philosophie 84 (2002): 20–45. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1988): –––––, ‘Kant’s beautiful roses, a response 12–18. to Cohen’s “second problem”’, British Schrader, G., ‘The status of teleological Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2003): 65–74. judgments in the critical philosophy’, Rogerson, K. F., Kant’s Aesthetics (Lanham, Kant-Studien 45 (1953–4): 204–235. MD: University Press of America, 1986). Stallknecht, N. P., ‘Kant’s concept of the –––––, ‘The meaning of universal validity aesthetic idea and the appreciation of in Kant’s aesthetics’, The Journal of modern art’, Review of International Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1981): Philosophy 29 (1975): 175–186. 301–308. Steigerwald, J., ‘Kant’s concept of natural –––––, ‘Kant on beauty and morality’, Kant- purpose and the reflecting power of Studien 95,3 (2004): 338–354. judgment’, Studies in History and Rueger, A., ‘Kant and the aesthetics of Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical nature’, British Journal of Aesthetics 47,2 Sciences 37,4 (2006): 712–734. (2007): 138–155. Sweet, K., ‘Reflection: its structure and –––––, ‘The free play of the faculties and meaning in Kant’s judgments of taste’, the status of natural beauty in Kant’s Kantian Review 14,1 (2009): 53–79. theory of taste’, Archiv für Geschichte der Tonelli, G., ‘Kant’s early theory of genius’, Philosophie 90,3 (2008): 298–322. Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 Rueger, A. and Evren, S., ‘The role of (1966), Pt. 1: 109–131; Pt. 2: 209–234. symbolic presentation in Kant’s theory Tuschling, B., ‘The system of transcendental of taste’, British Journal of Aesthetics 45 idealism: questions raised and left open (2005): 229–247. in the Kritik der Urteilskraft’, Southern Rush, F., ‘The harmony of the faculties’, Journal of Philosophy 30 (supplement) Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 38–61. (1992): 109–128.

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books Kant Bibliography

Uehling, T.E., Jr., The Notion of Form in Zammito, J., ‘“This inscrutable principle Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment of an original organization”: epigenesis (The Hague: Mouton, 1971). and ‘looseness of fit’ in Kant’s philosophy Verhaegh, M., ‘The truth of the beautiful of science’, Studies in History and in the Critique of Judgment’, British Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 73–109. Journal of Aesthetics 41,4 (2001): –––––, ‘Teleology then and now: the 371–394. question of Kant’s relevance for Wenzel, C., ‘Kant finds nothing ugly?’, contemporary controversies over function British Journal of Aesthetics 39,4 (1999): in biology’, Studies in History and 416–422. Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical White, D. A., ‘The metaphysics of Sciences 37,4 (2006): 748–770. disinterestedness: Shaftesbury and –––––, ‘Kant’s notion of intrinsic Kant’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art purposiveness in the Critique of Judgment: Criticism 32 (1973–4): 239–248. A Review Essay (and an inversion) of –––––, ‘On bridging the gulf between Zuckert’s Kant on Beauty and Biology’, nature and morality in the Critique of Kant Yearbook 1 (2009): 223–247. Judgment’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Zangwill, N., ‘Kant on pleasure in the Art Criticism 38 (1979): 179–188. agreeable’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Wicks, R., ‘Dependent beauty as the Criticism 53 (1995): 167–176. appreciation of teleological style’, The Zeldin, M. B., ‘Formal purposiveness and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism the continuity of Kant’s argument in the 55,4 (1997): 387–400. Critique of Judgment’, Kant-Studien 74 –––––, ‘Kant on beautifying the human (1983): 45–55. body’, British Journal of Aesthetics 39,2 Zuckert, R., ‘Boring beauty and universal (1999): 163–178. morality: Kant on the ideal of beauty’, –––––, Kant on Judgment (London/New Inquiry 48,2 (2005): 107–130. York: Routledge, 2007). –––––, Kant on Beauty and Biology Wilkerson, T. E., ‘Things, stuffs, and Kant’s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, aesthetic’, Philosophical Review 82 2007). (1973): 169–187. Zumbach, C., The Transcendent Science: Williams, F., ‘Philosophical anthropology Kant’s Conception of Biological and the critique of aesthetic judgment’, Methodology (The Hague: Martinus Kant-Studien 46 (1954–55): 172–188. Nijhoff, 1984).

philosophy.banhamhemsschulting.continuumbooks.com © Gary Banham, Dennis Schulting, Nigel Hems and Contributors 2012 The Continuum companion to Kant London: Continuum Books