DOCSLIB.ORG

History 5330: Historiography Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History 5330: Historiography Dr History 5330: Historiography Dr. Andrew Lannen Fall 2020 Office: 309 Liberal Arts North Phone: 468-2072 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Virtual Office Hours TBA Class time and Location: Mondays, 6:00pm-8:30pm via Zoom Course Description Survey of the literature of history; intensive studies of the style and philosophy of leading historians; the nature and extent of material for writing history. Required Books Anna Green and Kathleen Troup ed., The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth-Century History and Theory 2nd ed. (Glasgow, 2016). Natalie Zemon Davis, The Return of Martin Guerre (Cambridge, Mass., 1983). Sam Wineburg, Why Learn History When It’s Already on Your Phone (Chicago, 2018). Articles and Book Chapters In addition to books, we will read and discuss multiple articles and book chapters in order to get a wide sampling of the arguments and approaches in history. PDF copies of articles and individual book chapters are available sorted by week on D2L. Grading Scale 50% Weekly Response Papers 30% Class Discussion Leadership/Participation 20% Term Paper Program Learning Outcomes The SFA History Department has identified the following Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) for all SFA students earning an M.A. degree in History: 1. The student will be able to explain the key issues and developments in at least two historical periods (one per course). 2. The student will be able to identify the main historical works and interpretive debates associated with an event or period. 3. The student will be able to locate, identify, and critically analyze primary sources. 1 | Page 4. The student will be able to research and analyze effectively an issue or topic in writing. 5. The student will be able to present written work in an appropriate academic style, including the proper citation of sources using Chicago Manual of Style (17th or most recent edition). This section of this course will focus on PLOs 1, 2, 4, and 5. Student Learning Outcomes By the conclusion of the course, students will 1. Demonstrate an understanding of historiography and its importance to the study of history. 2. Analyze historical works from several different schools of historical thought. 3. Evaluate progression of the history profession from the late 19th century to the early 21st century. Explanation of credit hours awarded for course: This is a graduate-level history course. SFA Graduate courses in history generally meet 150 minutes a week for 15 weeks, and also meets for a 2- hour final examination or seminar presentation. Students are expected to complete weekly reading assignments of primary and secondary sources (books, scholarly articles, book reviews, etc.). Completion and comprehension of the readings is assessed through seminar style discussions, in-class presentations, and out-of-class writing assignments, including response papers, historiographical essays, annotated bibliographies, and research papers. Students are typically required to conduct a significant research project, including a research plan, an assessment of sources relevant to the project, class presentations in which they report on the progress of their project, and a final research paper. Formal written work over the course of the semester ranges from 30-35 pages. Course instructors are required to hold regular scheduled office hours to make themselves available to consult with students as needed. Doing the required reading, completing out-of-class writing assignments, and consulting with course instructors generally averages at least 10-12 hours of work each week. Online sections of graduate courses contain extensive written content within modules, and instructors hold "electronic office hours" to consult with students as needed, generally responding to student inquiries within twenty-four hours. Online course content includes the same information students in a face-to-face lecture course receive, requiring students to engage the online modules for at least 150 minutes per week. Besides engaging the material in the modules, online students have outside reading assignments similar to those mentioned above for face-to-face students. 2 | Page Class Discussion Leadership and Participation This seminar is centered around reading and discussion. You are expected to do all of the readings for each week, and to contribute meaningfully to discussions of those readings. Answers and exchanges should be thought- provoking, vigorous, and challenging, though above all, respectful of disagreement amongst each other. While attendance is not formally taken as such, missing multiple classes will prevent you from fully participating in class discussions, a major graded element of the course. Each student will help to lead the class discussion on three occasions during the semester. Discussion leaders will need to be more prepared than average since they will have primary responsibility for generating and maintaining active discussion through questions, challenges to readings, bold statements for others to refute or support, etc. Signup will occur prior to the second class. Note that there are three leader slots for each week, meaning that you most likely will partner with two or more of your classmates to share the burden. Response Papers Each week you will write a response paper that is approximately 3-4 double spaced pages in length. Papers will critically analyze that week’s readings and the author will engage and evaluate the ideas offered. This is not a summarization exercise. Instead, I want you to evaluate the arguments, compare the various author's points of view or approaches, arrive at conclusions of your own, and support your conclusions. Papers for each week’s readings are due at the beginning of the class meeting. For example, the paper on “Objectivity” is due by the beginning of class on August 31. Papers should be uploaded to the appropriate D2L dropbox for that week. Term Paper Each student will complete an end of term paper covering a significant historiographical debate, a prominent historian, or the reception and impact of a major historical work. You will see several examples of historiographical articles as models during the semester. All topics must be approved by the professor in advance. Papers should be approximately 8-10 double-spaced pages in length and should be formatted according to the standard for history as a discipline, The Chicago Manual of Style (currently in its 17th edition). If you are not yet familiar with CMOS formatting and citations, this is an excellent opportunity for you to research them and learn. Term papers are due via D2L by 6:00pm on Friday, December 11. Academic Integrity (A-9.1) Academic integrity is a responsibility of all university faculty and students. Faculty members promote academic integrity in multiple ways including instruction on the components of academic honesty, as well as abiding by university policy on penalties for cheating and plagiarism. 3 | Page Definition of Academic Dishonesty Academic dishonesty includes both cheating and plagiarism. Cheating includes but is not limited to (1) using or attempting to use unauthorized materials to aid in achieving a better grade on a component of a class; (2) the falsification or invention of any information, including citations, on an assigned exercise; and/or (3) helping or attempting to help another in an act of cheating or plagiarism. Plagiarism is presenting the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own. Examples of plagiarism are (1) submitting an assignment as if it were one's own work when, in fact, it is at least partly the work of another; (2) submitting a work that has been purchased or otherwise obtained from an Internet source or another source; and (3) incorporating the words or ideas of an author into one's paper without giving the author due credit. Please read the complete policy at http://www.sfasu.edu/policies/academic_integrity.asp Withheld Grades (Semester Grades Policy, A-54) Ordinarily, at the discretion of the instructor of record and with the approval of the academic chair/director, a grade of WH will be assigned only if the student cannot complete the course work because of unavoidable circumstances. Students must complete the work within one calendar year from the end of the semester in which they receive a WH, or the grade automatically becomes an F. If students register for the same course in future terms the WH will automatically become an F and will be counted as a repeated course for the purpose of computing the grade point average. Students with Disabilities To obtain disability related accommodations, alternate formats and/or auxiliary aids, students with disabilities must contact the Office of Disability Services (ODS), Human Services Building, and Room 325, 468-3004 / 468- 1004 (TDD) as early as possible in the semester. Once verified, ODS will notify the course instructor and outline the accommodation and/or auxiliary aids to be provided. Failure to request services in a timely manner may delay your accommodations. For additional information, go to http://www.sfasu.edu/disabilityservices/ Schedule of Meetings and Readings August 24 Introduction (No readings or paper due today!) August 31 Objectivity: Possible, or even Desirable? Discussion Leaders __________________ 4 | Page __________________ __________________ Required Readings: 1. Green and Troup, Houses of History, Chapter 1 (p. 1-46). 2. Lord Macaulay on History, 1828. 3. Leopold von Ranke, Excerpts from his writings. 4. Edward Hallett Carr, What is History? (New York, 1961), Chapter 1, “The Historian and His Facts,” pp. 3-35. 5. John Tosh and Sean Lang, The Pursuit of History 4th edition (New York, 2006), Chapter 7 “The Limits of Historical Knowledge,” pp. 173-193. 6. Richard T. Vann, “Historians and Moral Evaluations,” History and Theory 43(Dec 2004): 3-30. September 7 Progressive vs. Consensus Historians Discussion Leaders __________________ __________________ __________________ Required Readings: Theory: 1. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession (New York, 1988), pp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History 597.02E Readings in Gender History Course Syllabus: Spring 2017
    HISTORY 597.02E READINGS IN GENDER HISTORY COURSE SYLLABUS: SPRING 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sharon Kowalsky Office Location: Ferguson Social Sciences 105 Office Hours: Tuesday and Thursday, 2:00-4:30, or by appointment Office Phone: 903-886-5627 University Email Address: [email protected] COURSE INFORMATION Course Description: This course is a readings-based course designed to introduce students to the foundational authors and literature in Gender History. Through a detailed exploration and discussion of these works (in both monograph and article format), students will be exposed to some of the most important historical studies focusing on women, masculinity, sexuality, and gender. Although the readings focus on histories of the United States and Europe, for the most part, the course will also consider histories from other places around the world. History 597 may be repeated for credit as topics change. Course Materials: The following required books are available at the bookstore: Laura Lee Downs, Writing Gender History, 2nd ed. (Bloomsbury, 2010) ISBN 978-0340975169, $ Judith Bennett, History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006) ISBN 978-0812220049, $24.95 Gerda Lerner, Creation of Patriarchy (Oxford University Press, 1987) ISBN 978-0195051858, $19.95 Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, A Midwife’s Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard, Based on Her Diary, 1785- 1812 (Vintage Books, 1991) ISBN 978-0679733768, $16.95 OR Natalie Zemon Davis, Women on the Margins: Three Seventeenth-Century Lives
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History?
    Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History? Francesca Trivellato In the late 1970s and 80s, particularly after the appearance of Carlo Ginzburg’s The Cheese and the Worms (1976) and Giovanni Levi’s Inheriting Power (1985), Italian microhistory shook the ground of established historiographical paradigms and practices. Since then, as Anthony Grafton put it, “Microhistories have captivated readers, won places on syllabi, been translated into many languages – and enraged and delighted their [the authors’] fellow professionals” (2006, 62). Are the questions that propelled Italian microhistory still significant or have they lost impetus? How has the meaning of microhistory changed over the past thirty years? And what can this approach contribute nowadays, when ‘globalization’ and ‘global’ are the dominant keywords in the humanities and the social sciences – keywords that we hardly associate with anything micro? In what follows, I wish to put forth two arguments. I suggest that the potential of a microhistorical approach for global history remains underexploited. Since the 1980s, the encounter between Italian microhistory and global history has been confined primarily to the narrative form. A host of studies of individuals whose lives traversed multiple linguistic, political, and religious boundaries has enjoyed considerable success among scholars and the broad public alike. These are predicated on the idea that a micro- and biographical scale can best portray the entanglement of cultural traditions produced by the growing contacts and clashes between different societies that followed the sixteenth- century European geographical expansion. They also reflect a greater comfort among historians and the general reader, perhaps most pronounced in Anglophone countries, with narration rather than social scientific analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Life of Learning Nancy Siraisi
    CHARLES HOMER HASKINS PRIZE LECTURE FOR 2010 A Life of Learning Nancy Siraisi ACLS OCCASIONAL PAPER, No. 67 The 2010 Charles Homer Haskins Prize Lecture was presented at the ACLS Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, on May 7, 2010. © 2010 by Nancy Siraisi CONTENTS On Charles Homer Haskins iv Haskins Prize Lecturers v Brief Biography of vi Nancy Siraisi Introduction ix by Pauline Yu A Life of Learning 1 by Nancy Siraisi ON CHARLES HOMER HASKINS Charles Homer Haskins (1870–1937), for whom the ACLS lecture series is named, was the first chairman of the American Council of Learned Societies, from 1920 to 1926. He began his teaching career at the Johns Hopkins University, where he received the B.A. degree in 1887 and the Ph.D. in 1890. He later taught at the University of Wisconsin and at Harvard, where he was Henry Charles Lea Professor of Medieval History at the time of his retirement in 1931, and dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences from 1908 to 1924. He served as president of the American Historical Association in 1922, and was a founder and the second president of the Medieval Academy of America (1926). A great American teacher, Charles Homer Haskins also did much to establish the reputation of American scholarship abroad. His distinction was recognized in honorary degrees from Strasbourg, Padua, Manchester, Paris, Louvain, Caen, Harvard, Wisconsin, and Allegheny College, where in 1883 he had begun his higher education at the age of 13. iv HASKINS PRIZE LECTURERS 2010 Nancy Siraisi 2009 William Labov 2008 Theodor Meron 2007 Linda Nochlin 2006 Martin E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ego-Documents: the Last Word?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library German History Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 273–282 Ego-Documents: The Last Word? Kaspar von Greyerz Britain, and especially England, can take pride in an exceptional collection of early modern diaries, autobiographies and family chronicles. As far as the seventeenth century is concerned, no other European country, as far as the author is aware, is able to claim a comparable wealth of such documents, in terms both of numbers and of content. However, the fast-growing interest among continental historians1 has not, to date, caught on in Britain. The current increase in interest in mainland Europe was initiated in the early 1990s by a Dutch group led by Rudolf Dekker as a kind of avant-garde in this field. In 1988 Dekker had already published a useful overview of the development of the field up to 1986/87.2 The Dutch researchers began their work by concentrating on inventaries of autobiographical writing in the Netherlands.3 This in turn generated monograph studies and text editions.4 In the course of the same decade they were followed by a Swiss research group under the direction of the present author.5 In following the Dutch example, the Swiss team working at the University of Basel decided to base their research on new bibliographical tools which they established in digital form.6 Comprehensive 1 This was documented for the first time in the following conference volume based on a symposium held in 1998: K.
    [Show full text]
  • AMH5930, American Cultural Hist, Wise
    American Cultural History, 1880-1940 Benjamin E. Wise University of Florida 215 Keene Flint Hall Fall 2019 [email protected] This graduate seminar will explore American cultural history of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Our primary aim will be to consider the methods of—and methodological dilemmas posed by—cultural history. Our seminars will center on several guiding questions: What do historians talk about when they talk about "culture"? How can claims about culture be empirically (or otherwise) demonstrated? How should cultural sources be interpreted? How can interdisciplinary methodologies benefit historians? A related aim of the course will be for students to become knowledgeable about foundational works and recent trends in the field so that they can incorporate these ideas and methods in their own work, and know how to identify them in others. Emphasis will be placed on working with primary sources; in addition to numerous secondary readings, sources will include selections from Henry Adams, Josiah Strong, William Alexander Percy, D.W. Griffith, Edgar Rice Burroughs, and others. Writing requirements will include a primary source-based essay on a topic developed by the student. Grading Book Reviews: 25% Participation: 25% Final Essay: 50% Readings Books Henry Adams, The Education of Henry Adams (Mariner Books Edition, 2000) Jackson Lears, No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880-1920 Gail Bederman, Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917 Amy Louise Wood, Lynching and Spectacle: Witnessing Racial Violence in America, 1890-1940 John Kasson, Amusing the Million: Coney Island at the Turn of the Century Benjamin E.
    [Show full text]
  • The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts
    The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts Edited by Vivian Liska Editorial Board Robert Alter, Steven E. Aschheim, Richard I. Cohen, Mark H. Gelber, Moshe Halbertal, Geoffrey Hartman, Moshe Idel, Samuel Moyn, Ada Rapoport-Albert, Alvin Rosenfeld, David Ruderman, Bernd Witte Volume 3 The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Edited by Steven E. Aschheim Vivian Liska In cooperation with the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem In cooperation with the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-037293-9 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-036719-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-039332-3 ISSN 2199-6962 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: bpk / Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin Typesetting: PTP-Berlin, Protago-TEX-Production GmbH, Berlin Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Preface The essays in this volume derive partially from the Robert Liberles International Summer Research Workshop of the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem, 11–25 July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The CCWH Newsletter the Newsletter for the Coordinating Council for Women in History
    Volume 44, Issue 3 August 2013 The CCWH Newsletter The Newsletter for the Coordinating Council for Women in History T HE ONG O ING RELEVANCE O F T HE CCWH R ACHEL FUCHS Why do we need the CCWH? Is it still sor and to administrative positions in INSIDE THIS ISSUE: relevant when some major universities colleges and universities, women may President’s Column 1–3 now have women presidents and pro- still find the halls of these institutions vosts? In recent years, women have been somewhat chilly. In 1982, Roberta M. Executive Director 4 elected presidents of the AHA as never Hall and Bernice R. Sandler, as direc- Member News 5–6 before. Why do we need an organization tors of the Project on the Status and such as the CCWH to support women his- Education of Women of the Association NEH Medalist 7–8 torians when there are increasing numbers of American Colleges and Universi- of women deans, directors and department ties, issued an oft-cited report, “The Book Reviews 8–13 chairs? It is quite gratifying to see greater Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Obituary: Ann J. Lane 14 gender equality in the academy at many Women?” They demonstrated that cer- levels, and we applaud the efforts of all tain behaviors—both overt and subtle— groups that helped make this possible. Yet, created a chilly classroom climate for there are problems in our profession that women, which put women at a distinct result, in part, from the current diminished disadvantage to achieving academic suc- respect for the humanities, the economic cess.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. Darnton Shelby Cullom Davis ‘30 Professor of European History Princeton University
    Robert C. Darnton Shelby Cullom Davis ‘30 Professor of European History Princeton University President 1999 LIJ r t i Robert C. Darnton The French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu once remarked that Robert Damton’s principal shortcoming as a scholar is that he “writes too well.” This prodigious talent, which arouses such suspicion of aristocratic pretension among social scientists in republican France, has made him nothing less than an academic folk hero in America—one who is read with equal enthusiasm and pleasure by scholars and the public at large. Darnton’ s work improbably blends a strong dose of Cartesian rationalism with healthy portions of Dickensian grit and sentiment. The result is a uniquely American synthesis of the finest traits of our British and French ancestors—a vision of the past that is at once intellectually bracing and captivatingly intimate. fascination with the making of modem Western democracies came easily to this true blue Yankee. Born in New York City on the eve of the Second World War, the son of two reporters at the New York Times, Robert Damton has always had an immediate grasp of what it means to be caught up in the fray of modem world historical events. The connection between global historical forces and the tangible lives of individuals was driven home at a early age by his father’s death in the Pacific theater during the war. Irreparable loss left him with a deep commitment to recover the experiences of people in the past. At Phillips Academy and Harvard College, his first interest was in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • A Life of Learning by Gerda Lerner 1-21 the Charles Homer Haskins Lecture
    A LIFE OF LEARNING Gerda Lerner Charles Homer Haskins Lecture for 2005 American Council of Learned Societies ACLS OCCASIONAL PAPER, No. 60 ISSN 1041-536X Contents The Charles Homer Haskins Prize Lecture Series ii Brief Biography of Gerda Lerner iii Introduction by Pauline Yu v A Life of Learning by Gerda Lerner 1-21 The Charles Homer Haskins Lecture Charles Homer Haskins (1870–1937), for whom the ACLS lecture series is named, was the first Chairman of the American Council of Learned Societies, from 1920 to 1926. He began his teaching career at the Johns Hopkins University, where he received the B.A. degree in 1887, and the Ph.D. in 1890. He later taught at the University of Wisconsin and at Harvard, where he was Henry Charles Lea Professor of Medieval History at the time of his retirement in 1931, and Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences from 1908 to 1924. He served as president of the American Historical Association in 1922, and was a founder and the second president of the Medieval Academy of America in 1926. A great American teacher, Charles Homer Haskins also did much to establish the reputation of American scholarship abroad. His distinction was recognized in honorary degrees from Strasbourg, Padua, Manchester, Paris, Louvain, Caen, Harvard, Wisconsin, and Allegheny College, where in 1883 he had begun his higher education at the age of thirteen. Haskins Lecturers 2005 Gerda Lerner 1994 Robert K. Merton 2004 Peter Gay 1993 Annemarie Schimmel 2003 Peter Brown 1992 Donald W. Meinig 2002 Henry A. Millon 1991 Milton Babbit 2001 Helen Vendler 1990 Paul Oskar Kristeller 2000 Geoffrey Hartman 1989 Judith N.
    [Show full text]
  • Natalie Zemon Davis, Doctor of Humanities
    ! (#/#$-%!=%1'(!*#;-07!*',/')!'9!&:1#(-/-%0! ! Natalie Zemon Davis is Adjunct Professor of History and Medieval Studies at the University of Toronto and Henry Charles Lea Professor of History Emeritus at Princeton University. Regarded as one of the greatest living historians, she has expanded the boundaries of social history by studying previously neglected areas significantly transforming the studyof early European history. Over the course of her sixty-year career, she has distinguished herself as a fearless writer and innovative scholar through a wide range of scholarship that includes the history of early modern Europe, North Africa, the Caribbean, Judaism, and women and gender issues. Professor Davis grew up in Detroit, Michigan, in the shadow of World War II and was one of the few Jewish students in her class. She developed a passion for history at an early age. After graduating from Kingswood School Cranbrook, she went to Smith College, where she became concerned with issues of racism, union rights, and free speech and read extensively about the Italian Renaissance and the English and French Revolutions. She completed her degree in 1949 and went on to earn a master’s degree from Radcliffe College in 1950 and a doctorate from the University of Michigan in 1959. During this time she began to recognize the important role that ordinary people play in history and her focus shifted from the history of ideas to social history. She also became strongly influenced by the work of social anthropologists. Using nontraditional research materials such as letters, theater documents, bank documents and travel records, Professor Davis has crafted narratives to reconstruct the lives of people in the past and reshape our understanding of those cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 56 No. 1 Spring 2020
    CONFERENCE ON LATIN AMERICAN HISTORY Spring 2020 NEWSLETTER Volume 56, Number 1 IN THIS ISSUE: I. Message from President Bianca Premo 4 II. Message from Co-Executive Director Jurgen Buchenau 6 III. Minutes of the General Committee Meeting 8 IV. Officers and Committee Members Elected and Appointed 13 V. Constitution 15 VI. Prize Policy 23 VII. CLAH Committee Session Reports 26 VIII. CLAH 2019 Award and Prize Recipients 44 IX. In Appreciation: CLAH Endowment and Fund Contributors 53 X. List of Lifetime Members 54 2 2020 CLAH OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES Executive Committee: Regional/Thematical Sections President: Bianca Premo Andean Studies: Vice President: Ben Vinson III Elena McGrath, Chair Past President: Lara Putman Nicole Pacino, Secretary Executive Directors: Jürgen Buchenau and Erika Edwards Atlantic World Studies: Erin Stone, Chair Elected Council Members: Norah Gharala, Secretary Gabriela Ramos (2019-2020) Borderlands/Frontiers: Celso Castilho (2019-2020) Natalie Mendoza, Chair Eileen Findlay (2020-2021) David Carey (2020-2021) Brazilian Studies: Heather F. Roller, Chair Ex-Officio Council Members: Gillian McGillivray, Secretary HAHR Editors: Martha Few, Matthew Caribbean Studies: Restall, Amara Solari, Zachary Morgan Devyn Spence Benson, Chair The Americas Editor: John F. Schwaller Kaysha Corinealdi, Secretary H-LatAm Editor: Marc Becker Central American Studies: Standing Committees David Díaz Arias, Chair Jordana Dym, Secretary Nominating Committee: Karen Graubart (Chair) Chile-Rio de la Plata Studies: Matthew O’Hara Marian Schlotterbeck, Chair Alex Aviña Maria de los Angeles Picone, Secretary Program Committee: Colonial Studies: Carmen Soliz (2020 Chair) Alcira Dueñas, Chair Thomas Rogers (2021 Chair) Adriana Chira, Secretary Frances Ramos Gran Colombia Studies: Stefan Pohl, Chair Shawn van Ausdal, Secretary Mexican Studies: Pablo M.
    [Show full text]
  • AHR Forum the Kids Are All Right: on the “Turning” of Cultural History
    AHR Forum The Kids Are All Right: On the “Turning” of Cultural History JAMES W. COOK To situate this introduction, it will be useful to focus briefly on just what con- stituted the cultural turn. Victoria E. Bonnell and Lynn Hunt RUN A FEW WEB SEARCHES FOR the term “cultural turn,” and you will begin to grasp the scope of an increasingly viral concept. In Google Books alone, you will find more than 100,000 citations, the bibliographic traces of the concept’s extended wandering.1 Switch to the search engine at OCLC WorldCat, ArticleFirst, or ECO, and the num- bers become less daunting, somewhere on the order of a few hundred hits. In these more specialized databases, however, the searchable content is limited to titles and abstracts. So what you are really seeing is the initial layers of a much larger con- versation: the figurative tip of the bibliographic iceberg.2 What might the iceberg tell us? Most of all, perhaps, it provides a wide-angle view of the concept’s current ubiquity. In addition to Victoria Bonnell and Lynn Hunt’s 1999 volume Beyond the Cultural Turn, you will find thousands of recent books in- voking “cultural turns” in a wide variety of scholarly contexts—from sociology to My first thanks go to my fellow authors in this forum, especially Judith Surkis and Julia Adeney Thomas, as well as Konstantin Dierks, Sarah Knott, and Robert Schneider, who laid the groundwork for this project. For helpful ideas, readings, criticisms, and encouragements, I am grateful to Eric Slauter, Mer- edith McGill, Ann Fabian, Jackson Lears, Gina Morantz-Sanchez, Mark Hewitson, Marni Sandweiss, Andy Rotter, Tanya Erzen, Rachel St.
    [Show full text]