Of South Australia's Giant Cuttlefish Breeding Population

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of South Australia's Giant Cuttlefish Breeding Population Monitoring the relative abundance and biomass of South Australia’s Giant Cuttlefish breeding population MA Steer, S Gaylard and M Loo SARDI Publication No. F2013/000074-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 684 FRDC TRF PROJECT NO. 2011/054 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 March 2013 Final Report for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Monitoring the relative abundance and biomass of South Australia’s Giant Cuttlefish breeding population Final Report for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation MA Steer, S Gaylard and M Loo SARDI Publication No. F2013/000074-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 684 FRDC TRF PROJECT NO. 2011/054 March 2013 i This publication may be cited as: Steer, M.A., Gaylard, S. and Loo, M. (2013). Monitoring the relative abundance and biomass of South Australia‟s Giant Cuttlefish breeding population. Final Report for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2013/000074-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 684. 103pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The SARDI Report Series is an Administrative Report Series which has not been reviewed outside the department and is not considered peer-reviewed literature. Material presented in these Administrative Reports may later be published in formal peer-reviewed scientific literature. © 2013 SARDI This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. Printed in Adelaide: March 2013 SARDI Publication No. F2013/000074-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 684 Author(s): MA Steer, S Gaylard (EPA) and M Loo Reviewer(s): T Fowler and J Tanner Approved by: T Ward Science Leader – Fisheries Signed: Date: 20 March 2013 Distribution: FRDC, SAASC Library, University of Adelaide Library, Parliamentary Library, State Library and National Library Circulation: Public Domain ii NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................... VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ XII 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background.................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Need ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.3. Objectives .................................................................................................................... 3 2. REFINING THE EXISTING CUTTLEFISH SURVEY METHODOLOGY .............................. 4 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Site Description ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3. Habitat Characterisation............................................................................................... 8 2.3.1. Underwater Photo-Quadrat Surveys .................................................................... 9 2.3.2. Remote Video Surveys ........................................................................................ 9 2.3.3. Method Comparison ........................................................................................... 10 2.4. Cuttlefish Abundance and Biomass ............................................................................12 2.4.1. Underwater Visual Census ................................................................................. 14 2.4.2. Calibrated Remote Video Survey ....................................................................... 14 2.4.3. Method Comparison ........................................................................................... 16 2.4.3.1. Estimates of Abundance ............................................................................. 16 2.4.3.2. Estimates of Biomass ................................................................................. 18 2.4.3.3. Areal Expansion .......................................................................................... 20 2.5. Ambient Water Quality ................................................................................................21 2.5.1. Water chemistry collection ................................................................................. 22 2.6. Discussion ..................................................................................................................25 3. EXPLORING THE „CAUSE‟ OF THE CUTTLEFISH DECLINE ..........................................29 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................29 3.2. History of the Spawning Population ............................................................................31 3.3. Abiotic Influences ........................................................................................................34 3.3.1. Water Temperature ............................................................................................ 34 3.3.2. Onshore Wind .................................................................................................... 37 3.3.3. Rainfall ............................................................................................................... 39 3.3.4. Pollution ............................................................................................................. 40 3.3.4.1. Nutrients ................................................................................................... 41 3.3.4.2. Metal Pollutants ........................................................................................ 47 3.3.4.3. Hydrocarbons ........................................................................................... 51 3.3.5. Noise Pollution ................................................................................................... 51 iii 3.4. Biotic Influences ..........................................................................................................53 3.4.1. Predators ........................................................................................................... 53 3.4.1.1. Dolphins ................................................................................................... 54 3.4.1.2. New Zealand Fur Seals ............................................................................ 54 3.4.1.3. Snapper.................................................................................................... 56 3.4.1.4. Australian Salmon .................................................................................... 57 3.4.1.5. Yellowtail Kingfish .................................................................................... 59 3.4.2. Prey ................................................................................................................... 60 3.4.2.1. Western King Prawns ............................................................................... 61 3.4.2.1. Blue Crabs ............................................................................................... 62 3.4.3. Habitat ............................................................................................................... 63 3.4.4. Disease and Parasites ....................................................................................... 65 3.4.5. Fishing ............................................................................................................... 66 3.4.6. Tourism .............................................................................................................. 69 3.4.7. Other Cephalopods ............................................................................................ 70 3.5. Population Dynamics ..................................................................................................71 3.6. Discussion ..................................................................................................................74 4. GENERAL DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................77 4.1. Benefits and adoption .................................................................................................78 4.2. Further Development ..................................................................................................78
Recommended publications
  • Aberystwyth University Spermatophore Dimorphism in the Chokka Squid Loligo Reynaudii Associated with Alternative Mating Tactics
    Aberystwyth University Spermatophore dimorphism in the chokka squid Loligo reynaudii associated with alternative mating tactics Iwata, Yoko; Sauer, Warwick H. H.; Sato, Noriyosi; Shaw, Paul Published in: Journal of Molluscan Studies DOI: 10.1093/mollus/eyy002 Publication date: 2018 Citation for published version (APA): Iwata, Y., Sauer, W. H. H., Sato, N., & Shaw, P. (2018). Spermatophore dimorphism in the chokka squid Loligo reynaudii associated with alternative mating tactics. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 84(2), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyy002 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Spermatophore dimorphism in the chokka squid Loligo reynaudii associated with alternative mating tactics Yoko Iwata1*, Warwick H. H. Sauer2, Noriyosi Sato3, Paul W. Shaw4 1 Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Saltmarsh and Samphire
    Baker, J. L. (2015) Marine Assets of Yorke Peninsula. Volume 2 of report for Natural Resources - Northern and Yorke, South Australia 6. Saltmarsh and Samphire © A. Brown Figure 6.1: Saltmarsh with samphire, in NY NRM Region. (A) Point Davenport; (B) Winninowie Conservation Park. Photos (c) A. Brown. (B): (c) Google Earth. Asset Saltmarsh and Samphire Description Areas of saline, mineral-rich, organic-rich, and low oxygen coastal soils within and above high tide level, often fronted by mangroves, and backed by saltbush shrubland. Saltmarsh supports various salt-tolerant plants, with samphires being the most common and significant in terms of cover in South Australia. There are distinct assemblages of salt-tolerant invertebrates associated with saltmarsh habitats. Saltmarshes provide habitat for fishes, including juveniles of species which utilise other marine habitats, and are an important feeding area for various bird species, including migratory shore birds. Examples of Birds Main Species Cormorant species (e.g.; Pied, Little Pied, and Black-faced) Caspian Tern and Little Tern Pied Oystercatcher and Sooty Oystercatcher Black-winged Stilt, Banded Stilt, Great Egret, White-faced Heron, Little Egret the threatened species Hooded Plover Little Stint Red-capped Plover Slender-billed Thornbill (Samphire Thornbill) Rock Parrot The raptors Eastern Osprey and White-bellied Sea Eagle Migratory shorebirds listed under international treaties, such as Bar-tailed Godwit, Curlew Sandpiper and Sharp-tailed Sandpiper, Red-necked Stint, Grey Plover , Red Knot, Common Greenshank, Ruddy Turnstones Bony Fishes juvenile Yelloweye Mullet juvenile Greenback Flounder juvenile Southern Blue-spotted Flathead Western Striped Grunter Congolli Glass Goby Small-mouthed Hardyhead Silver Fish Smooth Toadfish Goby species such as Blue-spotted Goby and Southern Longfin Goby Adelaide Weedfish Baker, J.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Whyalla Trip Guide
    c/- Adelaide University Sport, University of Adelaide, SA 5005 Whyalla Trip Guide General Trip Overview Revision 0 (compiled by David Warren 30/05/2018) Whyalla Trip Guide Rev0 Page 1 Adelaide University Scuba Diving Club Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Location ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Accommodation .................................................................................................................................... 6 3 Finances ............................................................................................................................... 7 4 Diving ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Shore Sites ............................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1.1 Stony Point ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1.2 Black Point .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage
    NON-ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE 18 18.1 InTRODUCTION During the 1880s, the South Australian Government assisted the pastoral industry by drilling chains of artesian water wells Non-Aboriginal contact with the region of the EIS Study Area along stock routes. These included wells at Clayton (on the began in 1802, when Matthew Flinders sailed up Spencer Gulf, Birdsville Track) and Montecollina (on the Strzelecki Track). naming Point Lowly and other areas along the shore. Inland The government also established a camel breeding station at exploration began in the early 1800s, with the primary Muloorina near Lake Eyre in 1900, which provided camels for objective of finding good sheep-grazing land for wool police and survey expeditions until 1929. production. The region’s non-Aboriginal history for the next 100 years was driven by the struggle between the economic Pernatty Station was established in 1868 and was stocked with urge to produce wool and the limitations imposed by the arid sheep in 1871. Other stations followed, including Andamooka environment. This resulted in boom/crash cycles associated in 1872 and Arcoona and Chances Swamp (which later became with periods of good rains or drought. Roxby Downs) in 1877 (see Chapter 9, Land Use, Figures 9.3 18 and 9.4 for location of pastoral stations). A government water Early exploration of the Far North by Edward John Eyre and reserve for travelling stock was also established further south Charles Sturt in the 1840s coincided with a drought cycle, in 1882 at a series of waterholes called Phillips Ponds, near and led to discouraging reports of the region, typified by what would later be the site of Woomera.
    [Show full text]
  • EPNRM Board Annual Report
    EYRE PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board Annual Report 2009-10 For further information please contact: Kate Clarke General Manager Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board 23 Napoleon Street PO Box 2916 Port Lincoln SA 5606 Telephone: (08) 8682 7555 Facsimile: (08) 8682 5644 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.epnrm.sa.gov.au ABN: 81 927 209 608 29 October 2010 _______________________________________________________________________________ Eyre Peninsula NRM Board Annual Report 2009-10 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ................................................................ 5 FOREWORD – GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT ...................................... 7 PLANS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................... 8 EYRE PENINSULA NRM BOARD VISION AND VALUES .......................... 8 EYRE PENINSULA NRM BOARD STRATEGIC GOALS ............................ 8 STRATEGIC PRIORITY AREAS ......................................................... 8 GOALS ........................................................................................ 9 SOUTH AUSTRALIA’S STRATEGIC PLAN ............................................ 9 STATE NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................... 10 OPERATIONS AND INITIATIVES ......................................................... 12 ROLE, LEGISLATION AND STRUCTURE ............................................... 32 OBJECT OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • TNP SOK 2011 Internet
    GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK : THE TSITSIKAMMA SANP ARKS SECTION STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: N. Hanekom 1, R.M. Randall 1, D. Bower, A. Riley 2 and N. Kruger 1 1 SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 2 Knysna National Lakes Area, P.O. Box 314, Knysna, 6570 Most recent update: 10 May 2012 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; the referenced information is either correct or accurate; SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Hanekom N., Randall R.M., Bower, D., Riley, A. & Kruger, N. 2012. Garden Route National Park: The Tsitsikamma Section – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2. ACCOUNT OF AREA........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Octopus Consciousness: the Role of Perceptual Richness
    Review Octopus Consciousness: The Role of Perceptual Richness Jennifer Mather Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: It is always difficult to even advance possible dimensions of consciousness, but Birch et al., 2020 have suggested four possible dimensions and this review discusses the first, perceptual richness, with relation to octopuses. They advance acuity, bandwidth, and categorization power as possible components. It is first necessary to realize that sensory richness does not automatically lead to perceptual richness and this capacity may not be accessed by consciousness. Octopuses do not discriminate light wavelength frequency (color) but rather its plane of polarization, a dimension that we do not understand. Their eyes are laterally placed on the head, leading to monocular vision and head movements that give a sequential rather than simultaneous view of items, possibly consciously planned. Details of control of the rich sensorimotor system of the arms, with 3/5 of the neurons of the nervous system, may normally not be accessed to the brain and thus to consciousness. The chromatophore-based skin appearance system is likely open loop, and not available to the octopus’ vision. Conversely, in a laboratory situation that is not ecologically valid for the octopus, learning about shapes and extents of visual figures was extensive and flexible, likely consciously planned. Similarly, octopuses’ local place in and navigation around space can be guided by light polarization plane and visual landmark location and is learned and monitored. The complex array of chemical cues delivered by water and on surfaces does not fit neatly into the components above and has barely been tested but might easily be described as perceptually rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula
    SOUTH AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES ADELAIDE & FLINDERS UNIVERSITIES Regional Development Australia Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula Overview Geography RDA Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula covers an area of 170,500 square kilometres or 17.3 per cent of the State’s land mass. Population As at 30th June 2010 the region’s population was 58,700 persons or 3.6 per cent of the State’s population. The Indigenous population was estimated at 2,500 persons or 4.4 per cent of the region’s population. Economy and Labour force The region contributed $2,297 million to the State economy in 2006/07 or 3.4 per cent of gross state product. The four largest employing industries in the Whyalla Eyre Peninsula region were agriculture and fisheries (18.2 per cent), retail trade (14.3 per cent), manufacturing (11.9 per cent) and health and community services (10.9 per cent). Mining was relatively small at 1.4 per cent but is likely to show strong growth in the median term. The labour market is relatively strong with a participation rate above the State average and lower unemployment than the State average. Participation in VET courses is well above that for the State as a whole, while full-time participation in secondary school at age 16 is 71.4 per cent compared to South Australia at 78.4 per cent. NAPLAN reading results at year 3 are 15 percentage points lower than the State average but by year 7 they are 4.5 percentage points below the State average which indicates stronger school attendance over primary years of schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • EPLGA Draft Minutes 4 Sep 15.Docx 1
    Minutes of the Eyre Peninsula Local Government Association Board Meeting held at Wudinna Community Club on Friday 4 September 2015 commencing at 10.10am. Delegates Present: Bruce Green (Chair) President, EPLGA Roger Nield Mayor, District Council of Cleve Allan Suter Mayor, District Council of Ceduna Kym Callaghan Chairperson, District Council of Elliston Eddie Elleway Councillor, District Council of Franklin Harbour Dean Johnson Mayor, District Council of Kimba Julie Low Mayor, District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula Neville Starke Deputy Mayor, City of Port Lincoln Sherron MacKenzie Mayor District Council of Streaky Bay Sam Telfer Mayor District Council of Tumby Bay Tom Antonio Deputy Mayor, City of Whyalla Eleanor Scholz Chairperson, Wudinna District Council Guests/Observers: Tony Irvine Executive Officer, EPLGA Geoffrey Moffatt CEO, District Council of Ceduna Peter Arnold CEO, District Council of Cleve Phil Cameron CEO, District Council of Elliston Dave Allchurch Councillor, District Council of Elliston Eddie Elleway Councillor, District Council of Franklin Harbour Daryl Cearns CEO, District Council of Kimba Debra Larwood Manager Corporate Services, District Council of Kimba Leith Blacker Acting CEO, District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula Rob Donaldson CEO, City of Port Lincoln Chris Blanch CEO, District Council of Streaky Bay Trevor Smith CEO, District Council of Tumby Bay Peter Peppin CEO, City of Whyalla Adam Gray Director, Environment, LGA of SA Matt Pinnegar CEO, LGA of SA Jo Calliss Regional Risk Coordinator, Western Eyre
    [Show full text]
  • Eyre and Western Region Plan a Volume of the South Australian Planning Strategy
    Eyre and Western Region Plan A volume of the South Australian Planning Strategy April 2012 Eyre and Western Region Plan A volume of the South Australian Planning Strategy The Eyre and Western Region Plan has been prepared by the South Australian Government, through the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, as a volume of the South Australian Planning Strategy pursuant to section 22 of the Development Act 1993 and is subject to change. For further information Please visit www.dpti.sa.gov.au or telephone the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure on 08 8303 0600. Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the Minister for Planning, the State of South Australia, its agencies, instrumentalities, employees and contractors disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect to anything or the consequence of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. © Government of South Australia. Published 2012. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-7590-0210-4 FIS 23351 iii iv MiniSter foR PlAnning South Australia’s Eyre and Western region has many strengths: it is it is one of South Australia’s most important primary production regions, it has a growing aquaculture and commercial fishing industry based around Port Lincoln, a strengthening mining sector, and a growing energy generation industry that is able to maximise the region’s competitive advantage in renewable energy. The region is also home to South Australia’s largest industrial city, Whyalla, and is serviced by a range of commercial townships.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Behavior of the Japanese Spineless Cuttlefish Sepiella Japonica
    VENUS 65 (3): 221-228, 2006 Reproductive Behavior of the Japanese Spineless Cuttlefish Sepiella japonica Toshifumi Wada1*, Takeshi Takegaki1, Tohru Mori2 and Yutaka Natsukari1 1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan 2Marine World Uminonakamichi, 18-28 Saitozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 811-0321, Japan Abstract: The reproductive behavior of the Japanese spineless cuttlefish Sepiella japonica was observed in a tank. The males competed for females before egg-laying and then formed pairs with females. The male then initiated mating by pouncing on the female head, and maintained the male superior head-to-head position during the mating. Before ejaculation, the male moved his right (non-hectocotylized) arm IV under the ventral portion of the female buccal membrane, resulting in the dropping of parts of spermatangia placed there during previous matings. After the sperm removal behavior, the male held spermatophores ejected through his funnel with the base of hectocotylized left arm IV and transferred them to the female buccal area. The spermatophore transfer occurred only once during each mating. The female laid an egg capsule at average intervals of 1.5 min and produced from 36 to more than 408 egg capsules in succession during a single egg-laying bout. Our results also suggested one female produced nearly 200 fertilized eggs without additional mating, implying that the female have potential capacity to store and use active sperm properly. The male continued to guard the spawning female after mating (range=41.8-430.1 min), and repeated matings occurred at an average interval of 70.8 min during the mate guarding.
    [Show full text]