DOCSLIB.ORG

Hansard 11 Jul 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

11 Jul 1997 Ministerial Statement 2711 FRIDAY, 11 JULY 1997 PAPER The following paper was laid on the table— Minister for Natural Resources (Mr Hobbs)— (A) A Proposal by the Governor in Council to Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read revoke the setting apart and declaration prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. as State Forest under the Forestry Act 1959 of— (a) All that part of State Forest 561 AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT described as Lot 10 on plan CP 907012 and containing an area of Mr SPEAKER: I have to advise the House that 3.641 hectares; today I received from the Auditor-General the Report (b) The whole of State Forest 774 on Audits of Universities and Grammar Schools for containing an area of about the financial year ending 31 December 1996. 6.1210 hectares; (c) All that part of State Forest 898 REGISTER OF MEMBERS' INTERESTS shown hachured on plan FTY 1707 prepared under the authority of the Report Primary Industries Corporation and containing an area of about 36 Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I lay hectares; and upon the table of the House the ninth report of the Register of Members' Interests. (B) a brief explanation of the proposal. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT PETITIONS Foreign Tour Operators The Clerk announced the receipt of the Hon. B. W. DAVIDSON (Noosa—Minister for following petitions— Tourism, Small Business and Industry) (9.34 a.m.), by leave: It is my pleasure to announce today that I have formed a task force to investigate concerns about Cracow State School the operations of foreign tour operators in From Mrs McCauley (167 petitioners) Queensland. A number of issues regarding foreign requesting the House to ensure Cracow State tour operators have been raised with me over recent School remains open to service the needs of Cracow months. The types of concerns which have been and district families and their children. raised include: the safety risk of having tour drivers also being tour guides; tour drivers and guides not having appropriate work visas; tour operators Bribie Island State Schools requiring tour drivers and guides to take tourists only From Mr J. H. Sullivan (116 petitioners) to retail outlets which pay a commission to the tour requesting the House to place the Bribie Island State operator; tour operators charging tourists entry fees Schools (Bribie Island State Primary School, Banksia to free attractions, such as the botanical gardens; Beach State School, Bribie Island State High and tour operators using guides with limited School) in the education district of Murrumba. knowledge and experience of Queensland's natural and cultural attractions. Petitions received. Naturally, these sorts of activities, if they are occurring, have the potential to damage OVERSEAS VISIT Queensland's reputation as a tourist destination. These concerns have been raised for many years Report now, but the previous Government did nothing to Hon. R. E. BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise— address them. It is imperative that we investigate the Premier) (9.33 a.m.): I table a report on my visit to extent to which these activities are occurring, if at all. Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia which included I have asked that the task force report back to me by the opening of Queensland Government 31 October this year with recommendations as well representative offices in Jakarta and Central Java, as a process for the implementation of those and also the signing of an economic development recommendations. agreement between the State of Queensland and the The task force which I have formed is made up State of Johor. of representatives of the tourism industry and relevant Government bodies. They are: Mr Bob Brett, General Manager of the Gold Coast Tourism OVERSEAS VISIT Bureau as chairman; Mr David Jones, a Report representative of the Committee of Inbound Tour Operatives; Ms Angela Martinez, Marketing and Hon. S. SANTORO (Clayfield—Minister for Business Development Manager for CoachTrans Training and Industrial Relations) (9.33 a.m.): I lay Australia; Mr Hisakazu Akiyoshi, Chairman of the upon the table of the House a report of my recent Japan Tourist Association of Queensland; Mr Clinton ministerial travel to Hong Kong and China. Ward, tour guide with JTB on the Gold Coast; Mr 2712 Ministerial Statement 11 Jul 1997 Max Shephard, board member of the Inbound being printed for distribution to local authorities, who Tourism Organisation of Australia; Mr Alan Walker, will then be able to decide how they will adopt the from Ken Done; Mr Peter Colahan, General Manager scheme. I have arranged for all members to receive of Asian Connection Tours; Mr Don Phelan, Surfers advance copies of the information today. Paradise Coaches; and representatives of my Some local governments, such as the Brisbane department, Queensland Transport, the Office of City Council, have already adopted schemes which Consumer Affairs and the Federal Department of offer fee reductions based on incentives and the Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. degree of compliance. I would encourage other local My announcement today follows on from my governments to adopt the scheme which has been recommendations to the Tourism Ministers' council formulated by the department in conjunction with held in Canberra earlier this year. At that meeting I local government. I would emphasise that this is a told my counterparts from the other States that we model scheme and it is up to individual councils as to should consider licensing inbound operators as a how they wish to adopt it, either as is or with matter of priority. I have since written to my amendments. colleague the Attorney-General, Denver Beanland, on The incentive licensing scheme rewards this issue and he has agreed to ensure that it is raised businesses that achieve high standards of at the next Ministerial Council for Consumer Affairs. environmental management and encourages them to Inbound tourism is vital to every economy in continually move towards the best available practices Australia, but to Queensland most particularly. We in environmental management. Businesses qualifying need to be sure that we have the systems in place under the scheme gain a financial advantage while which will protect our reputation as a tourist the community benefits from a cleaner, safer destination. Our growing popularity with overseas environment. Those qualifying for the scheme will visitors has sparked a significant increase in the pay reduced licence fees and could also gain a number of inbound operators doing business in marketing advantage by promoting an Australia. Whilst the vast majority operate properly "environmentally friendly" or "green" image, as well as and ethically, there are always exceptions. being subject to fewer inspections and less Nonetheless, even one case is one too many. I look regulatory intervention. forward to receiving the recommendations from this In assessing environmental risk, four major task force to address these serious issues on behalf factors will be considered by the administering of the tourism industry. authority, that is, the local council. These are: the scale of activity, the level of compliance with environmental regulations, the level of compliance MINISTERIAL STATEMENT with relevant codes of practice and any "best Incentive Licensing Scheme practice" environmental management strategies used. Hon. B. G. LITTLEPROUD (Western Grades of licence available with fees reduced Downs—Minster for Environment) (9.37 a.m.), by accordingly by the administering authority will be: leave: Members of this House would be well aware of above Compliance 1, meaning world's best practice; the problems inherited by the coalition Government above Compliance 2 (regional best practice); with regard to the Environmental Protection Act Compliance 1 (licence conditions and code of introduced by the previous Labor Government. practice); Compliance 2 (licence conditions); and Through a temporary ministerial advisory committee below compliance (subject to environmental and subsequently the permanent Environmental management program). Protection Council appointed by the coalition The small-business component of the scheme Government, as well as through consultation will apply to businesses which need to be licensed between the Department of Environment and relevant under the legislation but which have a limited impact stakeholder groups, we have been addressing these on the environment and have two or fewer full-time problems. Concerns and proposals have been put to employees, or equivalent part-time employees, not me by many individual small businesses, members of counting immediate family members. Businesses this House, and organisations such as the qualifying for the licence could receive up to 50% Queensland Chamber of Commerce and Industry, reduction in licence fees and reduced regulatory the Metal Trades Industry Association and the Motor intervention, for example, fewer inspections. Trades Association of Queensland. Operators receiving a small-business licence will also The coalition Government recognised the need be able to apply for further reductions under the to reduce the financial burden on businesses, more incentive license component of the scheme. There particularly on those which pose an insignificant may be some in the business and industry sector environmental risk and have a good record of who believe the scheme, particularly the small- environmental performance. As a result, I asked business component, does not deliver enough. departmental officers to work with the Local However, taking into account the issues affecting Government Association of Queensland and several local government and the community desire for individual local council representatives to develop an environmental protection generally, I believe it does. incentive licensing scheme, including a special The main objectives of the scheme are: to move component for small businesses which pose industry attitude away from simply complying with insignificant environmental risks. I am pleased to the minimum requirements of the Act; to reduce announce that details of the model scheme have perceived inequities in licence fees, with low-risk been finalised and I will launch it today.
Recommended publications
  • Hansard 22 June 2000

    Hansard 22 June 2000

    22 Jun 2000 Legislative Assembly 1849 THURSDAY, 22 JUNE 2000 clear signals to industry, encouraging diversification of our energy sector towards a balanced energy mix. The past has been coal. The future, as Mr SPEAKER (Hon. R. K. Hollis, Redcliffe) the policy spells out, must be coal, gas and read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. renewables. The Government is actively pursuing the development of gas-fired power stations across the State. Cabinet will soon be GLOBAL CHALLENGE in a position to consider options to develop Mr SPEAKER: Order! I remind all gas-fired generation facilities in Townsville. We honourable members of today's launch of the have also achieved good progress in seven-day global challenge in the former negotiations with AGL/Petronas to advance Legislative Council Chamber at 12.15 p.m. I construction of the Gladstone-Townsville join the Premier and the Leader of the section of the PNG gas pipeline. Opposition in encouraging all members to I am pleased to advise the House today support the challenge and take part in today's that our energy policy has brought another launch. gas-fired power station to fruition. Later today, Energy Minister Tony McGrady, Treasurer AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT David Hamill and I will announce Government approval for the construction of a $250m gas- Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I fired power station at Swanbank near Ipswich. have to report that today I received from the The 385 megawatt facility will expand the Auditor-General a report titled Audit Report existing Swanbank Power Station and form the No.
  • Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001

    Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001

    Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony.
  • Hansard 17 Mar 1998

    Hansard 17 Mar 1998

    17 Mar 1998 Petitions 321 TUESDAY, 17 MARCH 1998 PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. Paedophilia From Mrs Bird (299 petitioners) requesting the House to act immediately to ASSENT TO BILLS establish a royal commission into paedophilia and Assent to the following Bills reported by Mr sexual assault against children. Speaker— Tobacco Products (Prevention of Supply to Home Help, Ipswich Children) Bill; From Mr Hamill (296 petitioners) Griffith University Bill; requesting the House and the Minister for Health Queensland University of Technology Bill; to restore the provision of Home Help services to those Ipswich residents who are experiencing Central Queensland University Bill; hardship as a result of cuts to service provision University of Queensland Bill; and further increase the allocation of funds for University of Southern Queensland Bill; the provision of such services in order that the needs of those requiring these services can be Eagle Farm Racecourse Bill; properly met. Law Courts and State Buildings Protective Security Amendment Bill; Police Resources, Wynnum Offshore Minerals Bill; From Mr Lucas (1,158 petitioners) Tweed River Entrance Sand Bypassing requesting the House to call on the Police Project Agreement Bill. Minister, the Honourable T. R. Cooper, MLA, to allocate sufficient police resources to the Wynnum Police District to bring its police to PARLIAMENTARY SCHOOL population ratio up to at least the average rate for RESOURCES PROJECT the rest of Queensland and, further, to ensure DOCUMENTARY that at night there is a minimum of two uniformed Mr SPEAKER: Order! I wish to advise police cars operating within the Wynnum district honourable members that photographers will be of the Wynnum Police District (i.e.
  • UEENSLAND Polit EFORM GROUP

    UEENSLAND Polit EFORM GROUP

    t Submission No: . L8. UEENSLAND POLiT EFORM GROUP hOUSESTANDINGOF p[p~(( ‘~x~..~; ~, 0738162120 Noel Turner LJ~GA±ANDAPPAJRSCONS P0 Box 563 Booval 4304 Submission ofcorrespondence copies as evidence of activity relating to: •:~ The shredding of the Heiner documents by the authority of the Queensland Government Executive on 23.3.1990, and the following cover-up to date ~• The Lindeberg Grievance submitted by the late MrRobert Greenwood QC This material is circulated to: •~ The H.ouse ofRepresentatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Afairs; “Crime in the Community” (Secretary Gillian Gould •~ The Australian Senate Select Committee on the Lindeberg Grievance (Secretary Alistair Sands ~• Professor Bruce Grundy, Department ofJournalism and Communications, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane. This material is organised in six (6) small folios covering the period from March 1996 (1993) to 1998. Each folio covers an initiative by us ( members of the Queensland Political Reform Group QPRG), and related responses to our initiatives, also supporting extracts of publications and public statements. The OPRG has as its objective , sound and just to all parties resolution of the events leading to the shredding of the Ileiner Inquiry Documents in Queensland on 23 -03 — 1990, and the following and continuing cover-up, and to have this conducted as a lawful and constitutional exercise by Queensland and AustralianPublic Institutions. ) Arrangement ofthe documents, and what they reveal 1. The first folio, docs 1 — 4 , show that OPRG was stating/supporting our view that only a specifically constituted Commission of Inquiry could competently examine the circumstances of the shredding of the Heiner Inquiry Documents, the following cover-up and political denials.
  • Domestic Relationship Evidence in Queensland: an Analysis of a Misunderstood Provision

    Domestic Relationship Evidence in Queensland: an Analysis of a Misunderstood Provision

    430 UNSW Law Journal Volume 42(2) DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIP EVIDENCE IN QUEENSLAND: AN ANALYSIS OF A MISUNDERSTOOD PROVISION REBECCA CAMPBELL* Relationship evidence or evidence that reveals an individual’s propensity to engage in certain offences has been the subject of much discussion in the context of domestic violence. Our understanding and awareness of domestic violence has developed immensely over the past decade and we now understand that domestic violence encapsulates much more than just physical violence against women. We now acknowledge it extends to sexual assault and child sexual abuse. This article examines the current protections provided by the law to restrict the admission of relationship or context evidence in order to ensure an accused person receives a fair trial. It does so by considering the development of the law surrounding relationship evidence, particularly the introduction of s 132 of the Queensland Evidence Act 1977 in 1998. This article explores the application of s 132B and questions whether its aim to simplify the process for admitting relationship evidence has actually been realised. I INTRODUCTION Evidence of the history of a domestic relationship between an accused person and his or her victim can have significant consequences when admitted at trial. By shedding light on the nature of the relationship between the parties, the finder of fact is able to put the charged offence in context. This can be particularly critical in cases of unlawful killing where the voice of the victim cannot be heard.1 Similarly, non-fatal acts of domestic violence such as assaults or sexual offences often occur in a situation where there are no witnesses,2 and as such evidence of the previous relationship between the parties involved can be very * LLB (Hons) BJ (The University of Queensland), lawyer of the Supreme Court of Queensland and currently employed as a solicitor at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions New South Wales.
  • QUEENSLAND January to June 2001

    QUEENSLAND January to June 2001

    552 Political Chronicles QUEENSLAND January to June 2001 JOHN WANNA and TRACEY ARKLAY School of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Playing Smart Politics with a Divided Opposition On 23 January, after embarking on a three week "listening tour" around the state's shopping centres, jumping on public transport and swimming with sharks, the Premier Peter Beattie called an early election for 17 February 2001 — with six months of his first term remaining. The campaign ran for 26 days, the shortest permissible under the Electoral Act. The catalyst for the snap poll was the damage to Beattie's government caused by the "electoral rorts" scandal involving mainly the powerful Australian Workers' Union faction. While the initial allegations of electoral fraud had involved pre-selection battles in two Townsville seats, the repercussions were much wider engulfing the entire party and bringing down the Deputy Premier Jim Elder and two backbenchers, Grant Musgrove and Mike Kaiser. However, Beattie's political opponents were divided and Labor benefitted from a four-way split among the conservative side of politics and some other conservative independents. From the outset of the campaign, Beattie attempted to present his team as "clean" and free of rorters. He argued that the evidence to the Shepherdson inquiry (see previous Queensland Political Chronicle) demonstrated that the rorters were "just a tiny cell of people acting alone, and they have resigned or been expelled, and I don't believe anyone else is involved" (Courier-Mail, 17 January 2001). As the campaign commenced, it became clear that Labor's campaign was not just organised around the Premier; Beattie was Labor's campaign.
  • A Critical Analysis of the Purposes of the Queensland Police Move-On Powers

    A Critical Analysis of the Purposes of the Queensland Police Move-On Powers

    The reasons and the reality: A critical analysis of the purposes of the Queensland police move-on powers Megan McKay Bachelor of Arts Humanities Program Queensland University of Technology This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) 2008 “The legislation spells out clearly what it [the Queensland police move-on powers] is to be used for. We are not singling out any particular group” – The Honourable Theo Cooper (then Minister for Police and Corrective Services and Minister for Racing) (Queensland Parliament, 1997c, p. 4393). “Move-on powers are not focused on any particular age group, sex, colour or race within the community. They only come into play when a person acts in a manner contrary to public interest as determined by this parliament” – The Honourable Judy Spence (then Minister for Police and Corrective Services) (Queensland Parliament, 2006d, p. 1814). Interviewer: …You’ve already kind of said young people may be being disproportionately targeted using the powers – do you feel there are any other demographic groups that may be… Jordan: Yeah. Interviewer: …targeted? Jordan: Well, Indigenous people, obviously, and people with mental illness. Ah, they’re the, the main one and, y’ know, homeless people. Megan McKay 04404254 ii Note Where reference is made in this thesis to a piece of legislation or policy that is currently in force, the version of the piece of the legislation or policy referred to is that which was in force as on October 9, 2008. Amendments to these legislative acts and policies, including their repeal, may have been made subsequent to this date.
  • Hansard 27 Nov 1997

    Hansard 27 Nov 1997

    27 Nov 1997 Ministerial Statement 4895 THURSDAY, 27 NOVEMBER 1997 properties; and (c) not permit the project to proceed without full community support. Petitions received. Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES TRIBUNAL REPORT Hon. D. E. BEANLAND (Indooroopilly— PETITIONS Attorney-General and Minister for Justice) The Clerk announced the receipt of the (9.33 a.m.): On 19 August 1997 I tabled the following petitions— 17th report of the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal along with a copy of advice from the Solicitor-General relating to a dissenting report Political Advertising from Sir James Killen. In response to a From Mr Beattie (23 petitioners) request from Sir James, I now table a copy of requesting the House to immediately cease his letter to me on 10 September 1997 in politically motivated, taxpayer-funded which he responds to the Solicitor-General's advertising being used solely to promote the advice. I table also further advice dated 24 National and Liberal Parties and request November 1997 from the Solicitor-General on instead that the money go toward (a) this matter. improving funding for TAFE to give young people an opportunity to gain important skills training; (b) increasing resources to improve PAPER the police presence in Queensland towns and The following paper was laid on the communities; and (c) improving health services table— to reduce accident and emergency waiting Minister for Emergency Services and Minister times and ballooning waiting lists in our public for Sport (Mr Veivers)— hospitals. Response to Public Accounts Committee Report No.
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    15 . The implosion of Joh Bjelke- Petersen, 1983–1987 The 1983 election ended the ‘constitutional crisis’ by providing the Nationals with exactly half the seats in the Parliament (41) and the opportunity to supplement their ministry with Liberal ministerialists who would agree to join the new government. The Premier had a number of options to secure his majority. Many of the surviving former Liberal ministers were not generally regarded as ‘anti-coalitionists’ in the previous government. The six potential ministerialists who might have been persuaded to change allegiances were: Norm Lee, Bill Lickiss, Brian Austin, Don Lane, Colin Miller and even Bill Knox. According to the Courier-Mail (15 July 1983), when two Coalition backbenchers, Bill Kaus and Bob Moore, had quit the Liberals and joined the Nationals in July, two Liberal ministers, Norm Lee and Bill Lickiss, already had indicated they would consider jumping ship. It was almost as if a race to defect was on. The two other Liberals to survive the 1983 poll, Terry White and Angus Innes, would not have been acceptable to the Premier and his senior ministers. In total, six of the eight Liberals had been ministers (although Miller had served for just 13 days after White was sacked and before the resignations of all the Liberals were accepted). Knox had been a minister since 1965 and Lee and Lickiss had been ministers since early 1975. They had some pedigree. Austin and Lane (and White) each had one parliamentary term as minister. Two Liberals, however, took the issue into their own hands. The day after the election, Austin and Lane had discussed the prospects of defecting and swapping parties, with Austin saying ‘I’m sick of this…I reckon we ought to give ’em the arse.
  • Queensland Election 2001 ISSN 1440-2009

    Queensland Election 2001 ISSN 1440-2009

    Department of the INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Parliamentary Library Current Issues Brief No. 15 2000–01 Queensland Election 2001 ISSN 1440-2009 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2001 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2000–01 Queensland Election 2001 Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group Gerard Newman, Statistics Group 3 April 2001 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the help given by Zac Dadic, Rob Lundie, Cathy Madden, Leanne Manthorpe, Rose Verspaandonk, John Wanna and Glenn Worthington in producing this paper.
  • PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia

    PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia

    PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia Edited by Anika Gauja and Marian Sawer Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Party rules? : dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia / editors: Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer. ISBN: 9781760460761 (paperback) 9781760460778 (ebook) Subjects: Political parties--Australia. Political parties--Law and legislation--Australia. Political participation--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Other Creators/Contributors: Gauja, Anika, editor. Sawer, Marian, 1946- editor. Dewey Number: 324.2994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Abbreviations . xi Acknowledgements . xiii Contributors . xv 1 . Party rules: Promises and pitfalls . 1 Marian Sawer and Anika Gauja 2 . Resisting legal recognition and regulation: Australian parties as rational actors? . 37 Sarah John 3 . Party registration and political participation: Regulating small and ‘micro’ parties . .73 Norm Kelly 4 . Who gets what, when and how: The politics of resource allocation to parliamentary parties . 101 Yvonne Murphy 5 . Putting the cartel before the house? Public funding of parties in Queensland . 123 Graeme Orr 6 . More regulated, more level? Assessing the impact of spending and donation caps on Australian State elections .
  • Hansard 9 Jul 1996

    Hansard 9 Jul 1996

    9 Jul 1996 Privilege 1341 TUESDAY, 9 JULY 1996 PRIVILEGE Procedure for Raising Matters Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) wish to take this opportunity at the read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. recommencement of the session to make a statement about the correct procedure to be adopted when raising a matter of privilege. ASSENT TO BILLS Under Standing Order 115, any member Mr SPEAKER: Order! I have to inform may rise in the House at any time to speak the House that I have received from Her upon a matter of privilege suddenly arising. Excellency the Governor a letter in respect to The test applied in the House of Commons is assent to certain Bills, the contents of which that the matter raised requires the immediate will be incorporated in the records of attention of the House. Examples of this would Parliament— be obstruction to the business before the House, or a contempt committed in the 23 May 1996 House, which must be dealt with immediately. Local Government (Robina Town Centre In the Queensland Parliament on 2 Planning Agreement) Amendment Bill; December 1929, Speaker Taylor ruled that a Plant Protection Amendment Bill; matter occurring the previous evening does not come within the Standing Order as it is Stamp Amendment Bill; insufficiently sudden. On 11 September 1973, Environmental Protection Amendment Bill; Speaker Lonergan held that a question of Primary Industries Legislation Amendment privilege must be raised at the time it occurs. Bill; A member in raising and stating a matter Suncorp Insurance and Finance of privilege may speak on the question of Amendment Bill.