DOCSLIB.ORG

Hansard 22 June 1994

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hansard 22 June 1994 Legislative Assembly 8379 22 June 1994 WEDNESDAY, 22 JUNE 1994 From Mr Lingard (1 247 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will instigate a referendum for the return of capital and corporal punishment. Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. Prince Charles Hospital From Mr T.B. Sullivan (22 486 DISTINGUISHED VISITOR signatories) praying that the proposal to relocate the Prince Charles Hospital cardiothoracic unit to Mr SPEAKER: Order! I wish to advise the the Royal Brisbane Hospital be rescinded. House that Ann Levy, a member of the Upper House in South Australia and shadow Minister for Petitions received. Consumer Affairs, is in the Speaker's Gallery. Honourable members: Hear, hear! STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS In accordance with the schedule circulated by the Clerk to members in the Chamber, the PAPER TABLED DURING RECESS following documents were tabled— Mr SPEAKER: Order! I have to advise the Casino Control Act— House that a report was tabled during the recess Rules of Casino Games Amendment Notice as outlined on the Daily Program circulated to (No. 1) 1994, No. 205 members in the Chamber. Recreation Areas Management Act— Recreation Areas Management Amendment PETITIONS Regulation (No. 1) 1994, No. 203. The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— PAPER The following paper was laid on the table— Sentencing Procedures Minister for Family Services and Aboriginal and From Mr Lester (12 signatories) praying Islander Affairs (Ms Warner)— that appropriate steps be taken to ensure that Queensland’s Forward Plan on Ageing. prisoners serve the full sentence handed down by the courts upon a conviction. LEAVE TO MOVE MOTION WITHOUT A similar petition was received from Mr NOTICE Turner (8 signatories). Mr BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise— Leader of the Opposition) (2.34 p.m.): I seek Capital Punishment leave to move a motion without notice regarding the stealth tax. From Mr Perrett (91 signatories) praying Question—That leave be granted—put; that capital punishment be reintroduced for and the House divided— persons convicted of murder, particularly the murder of children, and that if not reintroduced, AYES, 34—Beanland, Borbidge, Connor, Cooper, prison terms imposed for such crimes be served Davidson, Elliott, FitzGerald, Gamin, Gilmore, in full. Goss J. N., Grice, Healy, Hobbs, Horan, Johnson, Lester, Lingard, Littleproud, McCauley, Malone, Mitchell, Perrett, Quinn, Rowell, Santoro, Sheldon, Subcontractors and Suppliers Simpson, Slack, Stephan, Stoneman, Veivers, Watson Tellers: Springborg, Laming From Mr Campbell (13 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will NOES, 47—Ardill, Barton, Beattie, Bennett, Bird, protect the rights of subcontractors and Braddy, Briskey, Budd, Burns, Campbell, Casey, suppliers by amending the Legal Aid Act, praying Comben, Davies, De Lacy, Dollin, Edmond, Elder, for the establishment of an insurance fund to Fenlon, Foley, Gibbs, Goss W. K., Hamill, Hayward, guarantee full payment for goods and services Hollis, Mackenroth, McElligott, McGrady, Nunn, and praying that the Companies Act, which Nuttall, Pearce, Power, Purcell, Pyke, Robertson, shields directors from litigation, be amended. Robson, Rose, Spence, Sullivan J. H., Sullivan T. B., Szczerbanik, Vaughan, Warner, Welford, Wells, Capital and Corporal Punishment Woodgate Tellers: Pitt, Livingstone 22 June 1994 8380 Legislative Assembly Resolved in the negative. NOES, 48—Ardill, Barton, Beattie, Bennett, Bird, Braddy, Briskey, Budd, Burns, Campbell, Casey, Comben, Davies, De Lacy, Dollin, Edmond, Elder, PRIVILEGE Fenlon, Foley, Gibbs, Goss W. K., Hamill, Hayward, Speaker's Ruling Hollis, Mackenroth, McElligott, McGrady, Milliner, Mrs SHELDON (Caloundra—Leader of Nunn, Nuttall, Pearce, Power, Purcell, Pyke, the Liberal Party) (2.41 p.m): Mr Speaker, I rise Robertson, Robson, Rose, Spence, Sullivan J. H., on a matter of privilege. During the sittings of this Sullivan T. B., Szczerbanik, Vaughan, Warner, House since the Appropriation Bill was Welford, Wells, Woodgate Tellers: Pitt, Livingstone introduced on 31 May, you have allowed many Resolved in the negative. questions relating to the Budget to be asked and answered. As a member of Parliament—— PRIVILEGE Mr SPEAKER: Order! This is not a matter Mr G. Abbott of privilege. Is it related to my ruling about the questions? Mrs SHELDON (Caloundra—Leader of the Liberal Party) (2.48 p.m.): I rise on a matter of Mrs SHELDON: No. privilege. I draw your attention to a question Mr SPEAKER: Order! All right. without notice I asked—— Mrs SHELDON: As a member of Mr SPEAKER: Order! It is not a matter of Parliament, I find it outrageous that you have privilege. ruled against questions relating to the Mrs SHELDON: Mr Speaker, I seek your Government's imposing unfair performance ruling on this. dividends on council borrowings while allowing Government and non-Government members to Mr SPEAKER: Order! The previous ask questions relating to almost every other matter was not a matter of privilege. aspect of the Budget and the Estimates. In light Mrs SHELDON: It is not related to that at of your previous rulings, I believe it is a breach of all. privilege for Opposition members to be denied Mr SPEAKER: Order! That was not a this line of questioning, and I ask for your ruling matter of privilege all the same. I would like to on this matter. hear this. I hope it is a matter of privilege that the Mr SPEAKER: Order! That is not a matter honourable member is raising. of privilege. Is there any other business? Mrs SHELDON: I ask for your ruling, Mr Mr FITZGERALD: I move— Speaker. I draw your attention to a question "That so much of the Standing Orders without notice I asked the Minister for Justice and be suspended as to allow the motion of Attorney-General last Friday, 17 June, in regard dissent against the Speaker's ruling to be to whether or not indemnity was granted to debated forthwith so that this matter can be Glenn Abbott. I also draw your attention to the decided by the House." fact that the Minister stated he could not answer the question, and he asked for the question to Mr SPEAKER: Order! That is out of order. be placed on notice. The member cannot move that procedural motion. The Minister, later that day, then used a radio interview to answer the question before his answer could be placed on the notice paper or, LEAVE TO MOVE MOTION WITHOUT indeed, given to me. I feel that this is a serious NOTICE impediment to my position as a member of Mr FITZGERALD (Lockyer) (2.42 p.m.): I Parliament, when a question I have asked has seek leave to move a motion without notice. been answered on the public airwaves before that answer has been provided to me or to this Question—That leave be granted—put; House. I ask for your ruling on this matter, Mr and the House divided— Speaker. AYES, 34—Beanland, Borbidge, Connor, Cooper, Mr SPEAKER: Order! I have already Davidson, Elliott, FitzGerald, Gamin, Gilmore, advised members recently in the House of the Goss J. N., Grice, Healy, Hobbs, Horan, Johnson, process for dealing with matters of privilege. That Lester, Lingard, Littleproud, McCauley, Mitchell, is the proper process we should follow. There Perrett, Quinn, Rowell, Santoro, Sheldon, Simpson, was a recommendation of a Select Committee of Slack, Stephan, Stoneman, Turner, Veivers, Watson Privileges with regard to that. I suggest that that Tellers: Springborg, Laming is the way we should go. The Deputy Leader of Legislative Assembly 8381 22 June 1994 the Coalition should write to me about that that there was no such indemnity granted, matter. considered or even applied for. The honourable Any member, of course, can rise at any time member was on another fishing expedition, and in this House and refer matters of privilege to the she has got it wrong again. Privileges Committee, and that is for the House to decide. I am not going to be ruling on matters 2. Electricity Tariffs of privilege on my feet like that, because that is a process I am not going to use. Mr ELLIOTT asked the Minister for Minerals and Energy— Mrs SHELDON: I ask then that this be referred to the Privileges Committee. "With reference to the capital and tariff disparities between electricity supply in the Mr Mackenroth interjected. North West electricity area along the Mrs SHELDON: The honourable member Southern Queensland border, as compared is a joke. to the SWQEB area and to the ongoing Mr SPEAKER: Order! The question is negotiations between Queensland that the matter be referred to the Privileges authorities and the North West Electricity Committees. Those of that opinion say "Aye", to Authority— the contrary "No"; I think the "Ayes" have it. Will he use the equalisation of tariffs or some other instrument to rectify this disparity, thereby removing the disincentive QUESTIONS UPON NOTICE for value added industries to locate in this 1. Mr G. Abbott area and rectify the inequitable treatment of Mrs SHELDON asked the Minister for Queenslanders in this region?" Justice and Attorney-General and Minister for the Mr McGRADY: I acknowledge that Arts— negotiations are continuing between the "I refer to Glenn Abbott also known as Queensland Electricity Commission and the New Glenn Woodcock, the man who after South Wales North West Electricity authority, months of continually harassing threatening which supplies power to some 4 000 to kill Sherilee Teague was never charged Queenslanders around the Goondiwindi area. with stalking, but was yesterday fined a There is even the possibility that Queensland will paltry $400 for breaking a domestic violence take that franchise back from New South Wales order— and supply the area with a new line from Chinchilla. However, in the interests of I table a courtroom transcript Queensland consumers, that is not a sure documenting Police Operation Ginger, in process and many factors must be considered which Abbott who is referred to only as a before that action will be taken.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hansard 22 June 2000
    22 Jun 2000 Legislative Assembly 1849 THURSDAY, 22 JUNE 2000 clear signals to industry, encouraging diversification of our energy sector towards a balanced energy mix. The past has been coal. The future, as Mr SPEAKER (Hon. R. K. Hollis, Redcliffe) the policy spells out, must be coal, gas and read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. renewables. The Government is actively pursuing the development of gas-fired power stations across the State. Cabinet will soon be GLOBAL CHALLENGE in a position to consider options to develop Mr SPEAKER: Order! I remind all gas-fired generation facilities in Townsville. We honourable members of today's launch of the have also achieved good progress in seven-day global challenge in the former negotiations with AGL/Petronas to advance Legislative Council Chamber at 12.15 p.m. I construction of the Gladstone-Townsville join the Premier and the Leader of the section of the PNG gas pipeline. Opposition in encouraging all members to I am pleased to advise the House today support the challenge and take part in today's that our energy policy has brought another launch. gas-fired power station to fruition. Later today, Energy Minister Tony McGrady, Treasurer AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT David Hamill and I will announce Government approval for the construction of a $250m gas- Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I fired power station at Swanbank near Ipswich. have to report that today I received from the The 385 megawatt facility will expand the Auditor-General a report titled Audit Report existing Swanbank Power Station and form the No.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001
    Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 17 Mar 1998
    17 Mar 1998 Petitions 321 TUESDAY, 17 MARCH 1998 PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. Paedophilia From Mrs Bird (299 petitioners) requesting the House to act immediately to ASSENT TO BILLS establish a royal commission into paedophilia and Assent to the following Bills reported by Mr sexual assault against children. Speaker— Tobacco Products (Prevention of Supply to Home Help, Ipswich Children) Bill; From Mr Hamill (296 petitioners) Griffith University Bill; requesting the House and the Minister for Health Queensland University of Technology Bill; to restore the provision of Home Help services to those Ipswich residents who are experiencing Central Queensland University Bill; hardship as a result of cuts to service provision University of Queensland Bill; and further increase the allocation of funds for University of Southern Queensland Bill; the provision of such services in order that the needs of those requiring these services can be Eagle Farm Racecourse Bill; properly met. Law Courts and State Buildings Protective Security Amendment Bill; Police Resources, Wynnum Offshore Minerals Bill; From Mr Lucas (1,158 petitioners) Tweed River Entrance Sand Bypassing requesting the House to call on the Police Project Agreement Bill. Minister, the Honourable T. R. Cooper, MLA, to allocate sufficient police resources to the Wynnum Police District to bring its police to PARLIAMENTARY SCHOOL population ratio up to at least the average rate for RESOURCES PROJECT the rest of Queensland and, further, to ensure DOCUMENTARY that at night there is a minimum of two uniformed Mr SPEAKER: Order! I wish to advise police cars operating within the Wynnum district honourable members that photographers will be of the Wynnum Police District (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • UEENSLAND Polit EFORM GROUP
    t Submission No: . L8. UEENSLAND POLiT EFORM GROUP hOUSESTANDINGOF p[p~(( ‘~x~..~; ~, 0738162120 Noel Turner LJ~GA±ANDAPPAJRSCONS P0 Box 563 Booval 4304 Submission ofcorrespondence copies as evidence of activity relating to: •:~ The shredding of the Heiner documents by the authority of the Queensland Government Executive on 23.3.1990, and the following cover-up to date ~• The Lindeberg Grievance submitted by the late MrRobert Greenwood QC This material is circulated to: •~ The H.ouse ofRepresentatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Afairs; “Crime in the Community” (Secretary Gillian Gould •~ The Australian Senate Select Committee on the Lindeberg Grievance (Secretary Alistair Sands ~• Professor Bruce Grundy, Department ofJournalism and Communications, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane. This material is organised in six (6) small folios covering the period from March 1996 (1993) to 1998. Each folio covers an initiative by us ( members of the Queensland Political Reform Group QPRG), and related responses to our initiatives, also supporting extracts of publications and public statements. The OPRG has as its objective , sound and just to all parties resolution of the events leading to the shredding of the Ileiner Inquiry Documents in Queensland on 23 -03 — 1990, and the following and continuing cover-up, and to have this conducted as a lawful and constitutional exercise by Queensland and AustralianPublic Institutions. ) Arrangement ofthe documents, and what they reveal 1. The first folio, docs 1 — 4 , show that OPRG was stating/supporting our view that only a specifically constituted Commission of Inquiry could competently examine the circumstances of the shredding of the Heiner Inquiry Documents, the following cover-up and political denials.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Relationship Evidence in Queensland: an Analysis of a Misunderstood Provision
    430 UNSW Law Journal Volume 42(2) DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIP EVIDENCE IN QUEENSLAND: AN ANALYSIS OF A MISUNDERSTOOD PROVISION REBECCA CAMPBELL* Relationship evidence or evidence that reveals an individual’s propensity to engage in certain offences has been the subject of much discussion in the context of domestic violence. Our understanding and awareness of domestic violence has developed immensely over the past decade and we now understand that domestic violence encapsulates much more than just physical violence against women. We now acknowledge it extends to sexual assault and child sexual abuse. This article examines the current protections provided by the law to restrict the admission of relationship or context evidence in order to ensure an accused person receives a fair trial. It does so by considering the development of the law surrounding relationship evidence, particularly the introduction of s 132 of the Queensland Evidence Act 1977 in 1998. This article explores the application of s 132B and questions whether its aim to simplify the process for admitting relationship evidence has actually been realised. I INTRODUCTION Evidence of the history of a domestic relationship between an accused person and his or her victim can have significant consequences when admitted at trial. By shedding light on the nature of the relationship between the parties, the finder of fact is able to put the charged offence in context. This can be particularly critical in cases of unlawful killing where the voice of the victim cannot be heard.1 Similarly, non-fatal acts of domestic violence such as assaults or sexual offences often occur in a situation where there are no witnesses,2 and as such evidence of the previous relationship between the parties involved can be very * LLB (Hons) BJ (The University of Queensland), lawyer of the Supreme Court of Queensland and currently employed as a solicitor at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • QUEENSLAND January to June 2001
    552 Political Chronicles QUEENSLAND January to June 2001 JOHN WANNA and TRACEY ARKLAY School of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Playing Smart Politics with a Divided Opposition On 23 January, after embarking on a three week "listening tour" around the state's shopping centres, jumping on public transport and swimming with sharks, the Premier Peter Beattie called an early election for 17 February 2001 — with six months of his first term remaining. The campaign ran for 26 days, the shortest permissible under the Electoral Act. The catalyst for the snap poll was the damage to Beattie's government caused by the "electoral rorts" scandal involving mainly the powerful Australian Workers' Union faction. While the initial allegations of electoral fraud had involved pre-selection battles in two Townsville seats, the repercussions were much wider engulfing the entire party and bringing down the Deputy Premier Jim Elder and two backbenchers, Grant Musgrove and Mike Kaiser. However, Beattie's political opponents were divided and Labor benefitted from a four-way split among the conservative side of politics and some other conservative independents. From the outset of the campaign, Beattie attempted to present his team as "clean" and free of rorters. He argued that the evidence to the Shepherdson inquiry (see previous Queensland Political Chronicle) demonstrated that the rorters were "just a tiny cell of people acting alone, and they have resigned or been expelled, and I don't believe anyone else is involved" (Courier-Mail, 17 January 2001). As the campaign commenced, it became clear that Labor's campaign was not just organised around the Premier; Beattie was Labor's campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 11 Jul 1997
    11 Jul 1997 Ministerial Statement 2711 FRIDAY, 11 JULY 1997 PAPER The following paper was laid on the table— Minister for Natural Resources (Mr Hobbs)— (A) A Proposal by the Governor in Council to Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read revoke the setting apart and declaration prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. as State Forest under the Forestry Act 1959 of— (a) All that part of State Forest 561 AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT described as Lot 10 on plan CP 907012 and containing an area of Mr SPEAKER: I have to advise the House that 3.641 hectares; today I received from the Auditor-General the Report (b) The whole of State Forest 774 on Audits of Universities and Grammar Schools for containing an area of about the financial year ending 31 December 1996. 6.1210 hectares; (c) All that part of State Forest 898 REGISTER OF MEMBERS' INTERESTS shown hachured on plan FTY 1707 prepared under the authority of the Report Primary Industries Corporation and containing an area of about 36 Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I lay hectares; and upon the table of the House the ninth report of the Register of Members' Interests. (B) a brief explanation of the proposal. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT PETITIONS Foreign Tour Operators The Clerk announced the receipt of the Hon. B. W. DAVIDSON (Noosa—Minister for following petitions— Tourism, Small Business and Industry) (9.34 a.m.), by leave: It is my pleasure to announce today that I have formed a task force to investigate concerns about Cracow State School the operations of foreign tour operators in From Mrs McCauley (167 petitioners) Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the Purposes of the Queensland Police Move-On Powers
    The reasons and the reality: A critical analysis of the purposes of the Queensland police move-on powers Megan McKay Bachelor of Arts Humanities Program Queensland University of Technology This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) 2008 “The legislation spells out clearly what it [the Queensland police move-on powers] is to be used for. We are not singling out any particular group” – The Honourable Theo Cooper (then Minister for Police and Corrective Services and Minister for Racing) (Queensland Parliament, 1997c, p. 4393). “Move-on powers are not focused on any particular age group, sex, colour or race within the community. They only come into play when a person acts in a manner contrary to public interest as determined by this parliament” – The Honourable Judy Spence (then Minister for Police and Corrective Services) (Queensland Parliament, 2006d, p. 1814). Interviewer: …You’ve already kind of said young people may be being disproportionately targeted using the powers – do you feel there are any other demographic groups that may be… Jordan: Yeah. Interviewer: …targeted? Jordan: Well, Indigenous people, obviously, and people with mental illness. Ah, they’re the, the main one and, y’ know, homeless people. Megan McKay 04404254 ii Note Where reference is made in this thesis to a piece of legislation or policy that is currently in force, the version of the piece of the legislation or policy referred to is that which was in force as on October 9, 2008. Amendments to these legislative acts and policies, including their repeal, may have been made subsequent to this date.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 27 Nov 1997
    27 Nov 1997 Ministerial Statement 4895 THURSDAY, 27 NOVEMBER 1997 properties; and (c) not permit the project to proceed without full community support. Petitions received. Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES TRIBUNAL REPORT Hon. D. E. BEANLAND (Indooroopilly— PETITIONS Attorney-General and Minister for Justice) The Clerk announced the receipt of the (9.33 a.m.): On 19 August 1997 I tabled the following petitions— 17th report of the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal along with a copy of advice from the Solicitor-General relating to a dissenting report Political Advertising from Sir James Killen. In response to a From Mr Beattie (23 petitioners) request from Sir James, I now table a copy of requesting the House to immediately cease his letter to me on 10 September 1997 in politically motivated, taxpayer-funded which he responds to the Solicitor-General's advertising being used solely to promote the advice. I table also further advice dated 24 National and Liberal Parties and request November 1997 from the Solicitor-General on instead that the money go toward (a) this matter. improving funding for TAFE to give young people an opportunity to gain important skills training; (b) increasing resources to improve PAPER the police presence in Queensland towns and The following paper was laid on the communities; and (c) improving health services table— to reduce accident and emergency waiting Minister for Emergency Services and Minister times and ballooning waiting lists in our public for Sport (Mr Veivers)— hospitals. Response to Public Accounts Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    15 . The implosion of Joh Bjelke- Petersen, 1983–1987 The 1983 election ended the ‘constitutional crisis’ by providing the Nationals with exactly half the seats in the Parliament (41) and the opportunity to supplement their ministry with Liberal ministerialists who would agree to join the new government. The Premier had a number of options to secure his majority. Many of the surviving former Liberal ministers were not generally regarded as ‘anti-coalitionists’ in the previous government. The six potential ministerialists who might have been persuaded to change allegiances were: Norm Lee, Bill Lickiss, Brian Austin, Don Lane, Colin Miller and even Bill Knox. According to the Courier-Mail (15 July 1983), when two Coalition backbenchers, Bill Kaus and Bob Moore, had quit the Liberals and joined the Nationals in July, two Liberal ministers, Norm Lee and Bill Lickiss, already had indicated they would consider jumping ship. It was almost as if a race to defect was on. The two other Liberals to survive the 1983 poll, Terry White and Angus Innes, would not have been acceptable to the Premier and his senior ministers. In total, six of the eight Liberals had been ministers (although Miller had served for just 13 days after White was sacked and before the resignations of all the Liberals were accepted). Knox had been a minister since 1965 and Lee and Lickiss had been ministers since early 1975. They had some pedigree. Austin and Lane (and White) each had one parliamentary term as minister. Two Liberals, however, took the issue into their own hands. The day after the election, Austin and Lane had discussed the prospects of defecting and swapping parties, with Austin saying ‘I’m sick of this…I reckon we ought to give ’em the arse.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Election 2001 ISSN 1440-2009
    Department of the INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Parliamentary Library Current Issues Brief No. 15 2000–01 Queensland Election 2001 ISSN 1440-2009 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2001 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2000–01 Queensland Election 2001 Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group Gerard Newman, Statistics Group 3 April 2001 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the help given by Zac Dadic, Rob Lundie, Cathy Madden, Leanne Manthorpe, Rose Verspaandonk, John Wanna and Glenn Worthington in producing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia
    PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia Edited by Anika Gauja and Marian Sawer Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Party rules? : dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia / editors: Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer. ISBN: 9781760460761 (paperback) 9781760460778 (ebook) Subjects: Political parties--Australia. Political parties--Law and legislation--Australia. Political participation--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Other Creators/Contributors: Gauja, Anika, editor. Sawer, Marian, 1946- editor. Dewey Number: 324.2994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Abbreviations . xi Acknowledgements . xiii Contributors . xv 1 . Party rules: Promises and pitfalls . 1 Marian Sawer and Anika Gauja 2 . Resisting legal recognition and regulation: Australian parties as rational actors? . 37 Sarah John 3 . Party registration and political participation: Regulating small and ‘micro’ parties . .73 Norm Kelly 4 . Who gets what, when and how: The politics of resource allocation to parliamentary parties . 101 Yvonne Murphy 5 . Putting the cartel before the house? Public funding of parties in Queensland . 123 Graeme Orr 6 . More regulated, more level? Assessing the impact of spending and donation caps on Australian State elections .
    [Show full text]