Terminal Evaluation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Terminal Evaluation Report United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility Lebanon Sustainable Land Management in the Qaraoun Catchment, Lebanon GEF Full-size Project (PIMS 4642) TERMINAL EVALUATION REPORT Date: 10/06/2020 i. Opening page Title of the UNDP supported GEF financed project Sustainable Land Management in the Qaraoun Catchment, Lebanon Project ID#S UNDP Atlas Project ID: 00081592 UNDP PIMS ID : 4642 GEF Project ID: 5229 Project start date January 2016 Project end date Planned: December 2019 Actual: July 2021 Project duration Planned 4 years (48 months), revised 67 months Region Middle East Country Lebanon GEF Operational Focal Area/Strategic Program Land Degradation Executing Agency/Implementing Partner Ministry of the Environment Evaluation timeframe April/June 2021 Date of the Evaluation Report 10 June 2021 International Evaluator Giacomo Morelli Terminal Evaluation – Project “Sustainable Land Management in the Qaraoun Catchment, Lebanon” - p. i ii. Acknowledgement A deep thanks to all the people who have taken the time to provide the author with information utilized for the formulation of this evaluation report. A special thanks to the PMU for their support in organizing the entire process of remote meetings and interviews that made the evaluation exercise possible. Terminal Evaluation – Project “Sustainable Land Management in the Qaraoun Catchment, Lebanon” - p. ii iii. Table of contents i. Opening page ........................................................................................................................................ i ii. Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................................... ii iii. Table of contents ............................................................................................................................... iii iv. Acronyms and abbreviations .............................................................................................................. v 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Information Table ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Brief project description ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Evaluation Ratings Table ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Summary of findings and conclusions .......................................................................................... 3 1.5. Synthesis of the key lessons learned ............................................................................................ 4 1.6. Recommendations Summary Table .............................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Evaluation purpose ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope of the evaluation ................................................................................................................ 5 2.3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4. Data collection and analysis ......................................................................................................... 6 2.5. Ethics ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2.6. Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.7. Structure of the TE report ............................................................................................................ 8 3. Project description .............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Project start and duration ............................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Development context ................................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Problems that the project sought to address ............................................................................... 9 3.4. Immediate and development objectives ...................................................................................... 9 3.5. Expected results ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.6. Total resources ........................................................................................................................... 11 3.7. Main stakeholders ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.8. Description of the project’s Theory of Change ........................................................................... 13 4. Findings ............................................................................................................................................. 14 4.1. Project Design/Formulation ....................................................................................................... 14 4.1.a. Analysis of Results Framework: project logic and strategy, indicators ................................ 14 4.1.b. Assumptions and Risks ........................................................................................................ 15 4.1.c. Lessons from other relevant projects incorporated into project design.............................. 16 4.1.d. Planned stakeholder participation ...................................................................................... 17 4.1.e. Linkages between project and other interventions within the sector ................................. 17 4.1.f. Gender responsiveness of project design ............................................................................ 17 4.1.g. Social and Environmental Safeguards .................................................................................. 17 Terminal Evaluation – Project “Sustainable Land Management in the Qaraoun Catchment, Lebanon” - p. iii 4.2. Project Implementation ............................................................................................................. 17 4.2.a. Adaptive Management ........................................................................................................ 17 4.2.b. Actual stakeholder participation and partnership arrangements ........................................ 18 4.2.c. Project Finance and Co-finance ........................................................................................... 18 4.2.d. Monitoring & Evaluation: design at entry, implementation, overall assessment of M&E ... 19 4.2.e. UNDP implementation/oversight, Implementing Partner execution and overall assessment of implementation/oversight and execution ................................................................................. 19 4.2.f. Risk Management ................................................................................................................. 20 4.3. Project Results and Impacts ....................................................................................................... 21 4.3.a. Progress towards objective and expected outcomes .......................................................... 21 4.3.b. Relevance ............................................................................................................................ 28 4.3.c. Effectiveness ........................................................................................................................ 29 4.3.d. Efficiency ............................................................................................................................. 33 4.3.e. Sustainability: financial, socio-political, institutional framework and governance, environmental, overall likelihood of sustainability ........................................................................ 34 4.3.f. Country ownership ............................................................................................................... 36 4.3.g. Gender equality and women’s empowerment .................................................................... 37 4.3.h. Cross-cutting Issues ............................................................................................................. 37 4.3.i. GEF additionality ................................................................................................................... 37 4.3.j. Catalytic/Replication Effect .................................................................................................. 38 4.3.k. Progress to Impact ............................................................................................................... 39 5. Main findings, conclusions, recommendations, lessons learned ....................................................... 39 5.1. Main findings .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • UNHCR LBN HLT MAP 2014-05-12 01 A1 Bekaa Governorate Reaching the Most Vulnerable Localities and Phcs SHC MMU.Mxd
    SYRIA REFUGEE RESPONSE LEBANON, Bekaa Governorate Reaching the Most Vulnerable Localities in Lebanon, Health centers PHC,SHC and MMU 34°30'0"N 34°30'0"N 20 G" Location Health Facility Information Charbine El-Hermel Number P_Code Longitud_E Latitude_N ACS_CODE Governorate District Cadastral Name Village Name of Health Facility Name From MOPH List Arabic Name From MOPH List English El Ain El Ain PHCC 8 53217_31_001 36.37803046 34.22604727 53217Bekaa Baalbek Aain Baalbek Aarsal Ersal PHCC (Leshmania trained) 9 53231_31_001 36.41959158 34.17923604 53231Bekaa Baalbek Aarsal Baalbek Aarsal Ersal PHC - RHF Hariri Foundation / Irsaal Center ا ر ز ا - رل Bekaa Aarsal 53231 34.17923604 36.41959158 002_31_53231 10 Hermel Baalbek Aarsal MSF clinic at Al Irshad 11 53231_31_003 36.41959158 34.17923604 53231 Bekaa Aarsal El Hermel Baalbek Baalbek PHCC (RHF clinic ) 12 53111_31_001 36.21682 33.99931 Hariri foundation /Baalbeck .Hermil Gov در ا - ك - ؤ رق ا رري 53111Bekaa Baalbek Baalbek Baalbek Baalbek MSF clinic 13 53111_31_002 36.207957 34.005186 53111 Bekaa Baalbek Michaa Mrajhine 1918 v® Baalbek Baalbeck MOSA 14 53111_31_003 36.20795714 34.0051863 53111Bekaa Baalbek Baalbek G" G" Iaat Iaat MOPH primary health center Qaa Ouadi El-Khanzir Qaa Jouar Maqiye Iaat Governmental Health Center ات ا ا و 53123Bekaa Baalbek Iaat 34.03066923 36.16996004 001_31_53123 15 Laboue Larboue PHCC MOPH, Pending Funding Approval Zighrine 17 (Laboueh Municipality Center v® Batoul Hosp (hirmel ر ز د ا وة - ك 53234Bekaa Baalbek Laboue 34.1954277 36.35557781 001_31_53234
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Agency Q&A on Humanitarian Assistance and Services in Lebanon (Inqal)
    INQAL- INTER AGENCY Q&A ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES IN LEBANON INTER-AGENCY Q&A ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES IN LEBANON (INQAL) Disclaimers: The INQAL is to be utilized mainly as a mass information guide to address questions from persons of concern to humanitarian agencies in Lebanon The INQAL is to be used by all humanitarian workers in Lebanon The INQAL is also to be used for all available humanitarian hotlines in Lebanon The INQAL is a public document currently available in the Inter-Agency Information Sharing web portal page for Lebanon: http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/documents.php?page=1&view=grid&Country%5B%5D=122&Searc h=%23INQAL%23 The INQAL should not be handed out to refugees If you and your organisation wish to publish the INQAL on any website, please notify the UNHCR Information Management and Mass Communication Units in Lebanon: [email protected] and [email protected] Updated in April 2015 INQAL- INTER AGENCY Q&A ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES IN LEBANON INTER-AGENCY Q&A ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES IN LEBANON (INQAL) EDUCATION ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 FOOD ........................................................................................................................................................................ 35 FOOD AND ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Request for an Inspection on the Impacts of the Bisri Dam Project in Lebanon
    June 24th, 2019 To: Executive Secretary, the Inspection Panel 1818 H Street NW, MSN 10 - 1007, Washington, DC 20433, USA REQUEST FOR AN INSPECTION ON THE IMPACTS OF THE BISRI DAM PROJECT IN LEBANON We, the Lebanon Eco Movement (LEM), are a network of 60 environmental NGOs advocating for sustainable development and the protection of the environment in Lebanon. The movement co- founded the Save the Bisri Valley Campaign in collaboration with the affected communities and a group of experts. LEM is also a member in the Arab Watch Coalition. In this request, we represent a group of residents and landowners whose addresses and signatures are enclosed below. We are also attaching a copy of a new petition that gathered more than 30,000 signatures (Annex Z.b). Our network submitted an earlier request for inspection on June 6th, 2018, and the Panel did not recommend investigation. While we acknowledge the Panel’s previous efforts to address our concerns, we believe that the first complaint was not satisfactorily answered. The Recommendation Report given by the Panel focused more on ensuring a checklist of studies is filled rather than evaluating the validity of the studies and, most importantly, the grave social, environmental and economic harms the project poses to Lebanon. Consequently, the Panel accepted inaccurate information and factual discrepancies provided by the Bank Management. Additionally, given the emergence of new evidence and circumstances, we are submitting a new request for inspection. Our concerns have been already conveyed to the relevant authorities and to the World Bank Management in Beirut. However, the concerns were either disregarded, or addressed with neglect and delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Baalbek Hermel Zahleh Jbayl Aakar Koura Metn Batroun West Bekaa Zgharta Kesrouane Rachaiya Miniyeh-Danniyeh Bcharreh Baabda Aale
    305 307308 Borhaniya - Rehwaniyeh Borj el Aarab HakourMazraatKarm el Aasfourel Ghatas Sbagha Shaqdouf Aakkar 309 El Aayoun Fadeliyeh Hamediyeh Zouq el Hosniye Jebrayel old Tekrit New Tekrit 332ZouqDeir El DalloumMqachrine Ilat Ain Yaaqoub Aakkar El Aatqa Er Rouaime Moh El Aabdé Dahr Aayas El Qantara Tikrit Beit Daoud El Aabde 326 Zouq el Hbalsa Ein Elsafa - Akum Mseitbeh 302 306310 Zouk Haddara Bezbina Wadi Hanna Saqraja - Ein Eltannur 303 Mar Touma Bqerzla Boustane Aartoussi 317 347 Western Zeita Al-Qusayr Nahr El Bared El318 Mahammara Rahbe Sawadiya Kalidiyeh Bhannine 316 El Khirbe El Houaich Memnaa 336 Bebnine Ouadi Ej jamous Majdala Tashea Qloud ElEl Baqie Mbar kiye Mrah Ech Chaab A a k a r Hmaire Haouchariye 34°30'0"N 338 Qanafez 337 Hariqa Abu Juri BEKKA INFORMALEr Rihaniye TENTEDBaddouaa El Hmaira SETTLEMENTS Bajaa Saissouq Jouar El Hachich En Nabi Kzaiber Mrah esh Shmis Mazraat Et Talle Qarqaf Berkayel Masriyeh Hamam El Minié Er Raouda Chane Mrah El Dalil Qasr El Minie El Kroum El Qraiyat Beit es Semmaqa Mrah Ez Zakbe Diyabiyeh Dinbou El Qorne Fnaydek Mrah el Arab Al Quasir 341 Beit el Haouch Berqayel Khraibe Fnaideq Fissane 339 Beit Ayoub El Minieh - Plot 256 Bzal Mishmish Hosh Morshed Samaan 340 Aayoun El Ghezlane Mrah El Ain Salhat El Ma 343 Beit Younes En Nabi Khaled Shayahat Ech Cheikh Maarouf Habchit Kouakh El Minieh - Plots: 1797 1796 1798 1799 Jdeidet El Qaitaa Khirbit Ej Jord En Nabi Youchaa Souaisse 342 Sfainet el Qaitaa Jawz Karm El Akhras Haouch Es Saiyad AaliHosh Elsayed Ali Deir Aamar Hrar Aalaiqa Mrah Qamar ed Dine
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Water Quality Management Options in the Upper Litani Basin, Lebanon, Using an Integrated GIS-Based Decision Support System
    Environmental Modelling & Software 23 (2008) 1327–1337 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Modelling & Software journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envsoft Assessing water quality management options in the Upper Litani Basin, Lebanon, using an integrated GIS-based decision support system Hamed Assaf a,*, Mark Saadeh b,1 a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, AUB POBox 11-0236 Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon b Water Quality Department, Litani River Authority, Beirut, Lebanon article info abstract Article history: The widespread and relentless discharge of untreated wastewater into the Upper Litani Basin (ULB) river Received 14 September 2007 system in Lebanon has reached staggering levels rendering its water unfit for most uses especially during Received in revised form 18 March 2008 the drier times of the year. Despite the call by governmental and non-governmental agencies to develop Accepted 19 March 2008 several wastewater treatment plants and sewage networks in an effort to control this problem, these Available online 5 May 2008 efforts do not seem to be coordinated or based on comprehensive and integrated assessments of current and projected conditions in the basin. Keywords: This paper provides an overview of the development and implementation of an integrated decision Water support system (DSS) designed to help policy makers and other stakeholders have a clearer un- Environmental planning Water quality control derstanding of the key factors and processes involved in the sewage induced degradation of surface Decision support systems water quality in the ULB, and formulate, assess and evaluate alternative management plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Decentralized Renewable Energy Power Generation
    United Nations Development Programme Country: Lebanon PROJECT DOCUMENT1 Project Title: Small Decentralized Renewable Energy Power Generation UNDAF Outcome(s): By 2014, improved accessibility and management of natural resources and enhanced response to national and global environmental challenges UNDP Strategic Plan Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: Increased effective response to climate change reflected in national programmes and external assistance programmes UNDP Strategic Plan Secondary Outcome: Environmental considerations are mainstreamed in sector and local‐level strategies and plans Expected CP Outcome(s): Climate change considerations mainstreamed in national priorities Expected CPAP Output (s):. National sustainable energy strategy developed and its implementation promoted Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: Ministry of Energy and Water Implementing Entity/Responsible Partners: United Nations Development Programme Brief Description The project will catalyze the development of the small, decentralized, grid‐connected renewable energy (RE) power generation market in Lebanon. The target is to facilitate the installation of at least 1.75 MW of new decentralized RE power generation capacity during the lifetime of the project, resulting in direct GHG reduction benefits of approximately 35,500 tonnes of CO2eq. Complementary indirect mitigation benefits are expected from the sustained market growth of decentralized RE power generation investments after the project and from paving the way for larger RE power plants – for example, by clarifying the technical and institutional aspects of connecting RE‐based intermittent power generation sources into the grid and leveraging financing for RE investments from new sources such as carbon and climate financing. This indirect GHG reduction impact of the project has been estimated to range from 317,000 tonnes to over 1.7 million tonnes of CO2eq depending on the assumptions made.
    [Show full text]
  • Litani River Basin Management Support Program
    LITANI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROGRAM FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS IN THE LITANI RIVER BASIN February 2012 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by International Resources Group (IRG) under Contract EPP-I-00-04-00024-00 order no 7. LITANI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROGRAM FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS IN THE LITANI RIVER BASIN Contract No.: EPP-I-00-04-00024-00 order no 7. FEBRUARY 2012 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION ················································································ 3 2.1. Litani River Basin Physical Overview ............................................................................................... 1 3. TREATMENT WETLANDS OVERVIEW ················································ 4 3.1. History .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Ancillary Benefits .................................................................................................................................. 5 3.3. Types of Systems .................................................................................................................................. 5 4. LITANI RIVER BASIN PILOT WETLANDS SITE AND TYPE
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Litani Basin the Litani River Basin Consultation Meeting Sherif Arif Beirut, December12, 2013 Lebanon Water Resources
    Cost Assessment of Water Resources Degradation (CAWRD) of the Litani Basin The Litani River Basin Consultation Meeting Sherif Arif Beirut, December12, 2013 Lebanon Water Resources Population: 4.4 million (2012) GDP total : US$ 43 billion ( 2012) Per Capita Water Availability : 926 m3/year (Average MNA : 1000 ) Water Resources Availability : 2.7 billion cubic meter (BCM) Surface Water : 2.2 BCM Groundwater 0.5 BCM Water Resources Distribution : Irrigation: 0.8 BCM ( 53.4%) Domestic Water : 0.5 BCM ( 33.4%) Industry : 0.2 BCM ( 13.2%) Agricultural Sector : 5% of the GDP (2009), 2% of the population is employed , and is a source of income for 20-30% of the population Cultivable Land • Cultivable land is limited to 250,000 ha of which approximately 100,000 ha is irrigated. • Lebanon’s per capita land availability is among one of the lowest in the world at 0.24 ha/capita. • The most fertile areas are located in the Bekaa valley and along the narrow coastal strip in Akkar. Main crops include cereals (mainly wheat and barley), fruits and vegetables, olives, grapes, and tobacco, along with sheep and goat herding. • The irrigation sector is characterized by inadequate water storage capacity, lack of proper maintenance and a heavy reliance on hydropower cross-subsidies • Dam capacity accounts for only 6% of total renewable water resources in Lebanon and is a constraint for irrigation water demand, which accounts for more than 50% of total water consumption Potable Water and Waste Water Potable Water Connection rate: 100 % urban areas Water
    [Show full text]
  • Water Sector Lebanon
    WATER SECTOR LEBANON Bekaa: Informal Settlements (Active & <4 tents) Coverage Date: 6/21/2017 Partner Donor (! ACF No Donor (! INTERSOS ECHO NMFA (! LRC Red Cross (! Medair UNHCR Mercy Corps UNICEF (! Qaa Er-Rim SIDA Niha Zahlé (! NRC Nabi Ayla Administrative boundaries (! Solidarites International (! Hazerta (! (!(! (!(!! Caza (!(!(! H(!a(ouch El-Ghanam WVI Ouadi El-Aarayech ! (! ((!(! Nabi A(!y!la (! (! (!(! (! Cadasters Ablah ( (! (! No Partner Aali En-Nahri (!(!(! Fourzol (!(! Nasriyet Rizk Touaite Zahlé Zahlé Er-Rassiyé (! Haouch El-Aamara (! Riyaq (!(!(!(! ! Zahlé El-Berbara (! (!(!(!(!(!((! (!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(! (! (! (! (! (! Zahlé El-Midane (!(!(! (!(! (! (!(!(!(! (! (!(! (!(!(!(!(! Massa Zahle Zahlé Aradi (!(!(! (! Haouch Hala (!(! Individuals Zahlé Mar Elias Zahlé El-Maallaqa (! (! (! (! !(! (! (! (! (!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(! (! (! (! ( (! (! Zahlé Haouch Ez-Zaraane (! (! (! (! (!(!(! (! (! (! (!(!(! ( 0 - 200 (!(!(!(! (!(! (! (! (! (! (! (! Mazraat Er-Remtaniyé (!(! (!(!(!(!(! (! (!(! (!(!(!(! (!(!! (!(! (!(! (! (! Raait Zahlé Haouch El-Ouma(!ra(!(! (! ((!(!(! (!(!(! (!(! (!(! (! (! (! (! (!Zahlé M(!!a(!alla(!qa Arad(!i(!(! (! ( 201 - 300 (!(! (! !(((! (! (!(!(! (! (!(!(! (! (!(!(!(! (! (!(!(!( (!(!(!( (!(! (! (!(! (! (!(! (! (! (! (! Ksara (!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!! (! (! (!(! (! (! (! (!(!(! ( (!(!(!(!(!(! (!!(! (!(! (!(! (!(! (! Deir El-Ghazal Greater than 300 (! (!(!(!(! (!(!(! (!(!(! ( (!(!(!(! (!(! (! (! ( (! (!(! (! (! (! (!(! Hoshmosh (!(! Zahlé(! Ha(!ouch El-Ou(!m(!ar(!a Aradi(!(! (!(! (!(! (!(!(! (! (! (!(!(! (! Jdita (! (!(! (! (!
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Report Lake Qaraoun Pollution Prevention Project (P147854) Lake Qaraoun Pollution Prevention Project (P147854) MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA | Lebanon | Environment, Natural Resources & the Blue Economy Global Practice | IBRD/IDA | Investment Project Financing | FY 2017 | Seq No: 6 | ARCHIVED on 15-Sep-2019 | ISR38423 | Public Disclosure Authorized Implementing Agencies: Council for Development and Reconstruction, Lebanese Republic, Ministry of Finance Key Dates Key Project Dates Bank Approval Date: 14-Jul-2016 Effectiveness Date: 13-Dec-2016 Planned Mid Term Review Date: 10-Dec-2019 Actual Mid-Term Review Date: Original Closing Date: 30-Jun-2023 Revised Closing Date: 30-Jun-2023 pdoTable Public Disclosure Authorized Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The development objectives of the project are to reduce the quantity of untreated municipal sewage discharged into the Litani riverand to improve pollution management around Qaraoun Lake. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project Objective? No Components Table Name Component 1: Improvement of Municipal Sewage Collection:(Cost $50.50 M) Public Disclosure Authorized Component 2. Promotion of Good Agricultural Practices (Including Integrated Pest Management):(Cost $1.50 M) Component 3. Solid Waste Management, Water Quality Monitoring, Capacity Building and Project Management:(Cost $3.00 M) Overall Ratings Name Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Substantial Substantial Implementation Status and Key Decisions Public Disclosure Authorized This ISR follows the fourth implementation support review of April 2nd to April 9th 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Master Plan for the Closure and Rehabilitation
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY OF LEBANON Volume A JUNE 2017 Copyright © 2017 All rights reserved for United Nations Development Programme and the Ministry of Environment UNDP is the UN's global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. We are on the ground in nearly 170 countries, working with them on their own solutions to global and national development challenges. As they develop local capacity, they draw on the people of UNDP and our wide range of partners. Disclaimer The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of its authors, and do not necessarily reect the opinion of the Ministry of Environment or the United Nations Development Programme, who will not accept any liability derived from its use. This study can be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Please give credit where it is due. UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY OF LEBANON Volume A JUNE 2017 Consultant (This page has been intentionally left blank) UPDATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF UNCONTROLLED DUMPSITES MOE-UNDP UPDATED MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Second National Report
    FINAL VERSION Please provide the following details on the origin of this report. Contracting Party Lebanon National Focal Point Full name of the institution: Ministry of the Environment Name and title of contact officer: Ms. Lara Samaha CBD Focal Point Mailing address: 70-1091 Antelias Lebanon Telephone: +961-4-522-222 Ext. 455 Fax: +961-4-525-080 E-mail: [email protected] Contact officer for national report (if different) Full name of the institution: Ministry of Environment Name and title of contact officer: Dr. Berj Hatjian Director General Mailing address: 70-1091 Antelias Lebanon Telephone: +961-4-522-222 Ext. 500 Fax: +961-4-525-080 E-mail: [email protected] Submission Signature of officer responsible for submitting national report: Date of submission: EXECUTIVE SUMARY The Second National Report of Lebanon was developed to give a comprehensive perspective of Lebanon’s status in implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity. Taking into consideration the nature of the report template and the absence of a formal national body that monitors and guides biodiversity related activities in Lebanon, the authors decided to adopt a participatory approach for the completion of this report to include all stakeholders’ inputs and ensure a representative national perspective. The report includes documented and verbally relayed information, in addition, it reflects prevalent perspectives of 54 stakeholders who were interviewed from various sectors of the society and who currently constitute the bulk of individuals involved in biodiversity related activities in Lebanon. Lebanon is deficient in the following areas: taxonomy, monitoring, alien species, ex-situ, sustainable use, incentive measures, genetic resources, technology transfer, technical and scientific cooperation, biotechnology and information exchange.
    [Show full text]