DOCSLIB.ORG

Visibility Rule and BART for Regional Haze, Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visibility Rule and BART for Regional Haze, Final Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Visibility Rule or the Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations Under the Regional Haze Regulations EPA-452/R-05-004 June 2005 Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Visibility Rule or the Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations Under the Regional Haze Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division, Emission, Monitoring, and Analysis Division and Clean Air Markets Division CONTENTS Section Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ 1-1 1.1 Background .............................................. 1-1 1.2 Results .................................................. 1-2 1.2.1 Health Benefits ...................................... 1-4 1.2.2 Welfare Benefits .................................... 1-7 1.2.3 Uncertainty in the Benefits Estimates .................... 1-7 1.3 Not All Benefits Quantified .................................. 1-8 1.4 Costs and Economic Impacts ................................ 1-10 1.5 Limitations .............................................. 1-11 1.6 References .............................................. 1-12 2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................ 2-1 2.1 Background .............................................. 2-1 2.2 Regulated Source Categories ................................. 2-3 2.3 Control Scenarios.......................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Electric Generating Units .............................. 2-5 2.3.2 Sources Other than Electric Generating Units .............. 2-6 2.4 Baseline and Years of Analysis ............................... 2-7 2.5 Organization of this Report .................................. 2-8 3. EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS ........................ 3-1 3.1 Emissions Inventories and Estimated Emissions Reductions ........ 3-1 3.2 Air Quality Impacts ........................................ 3-4 iii 3.2.1 PM Air Quality Estimates ............................. 3-6 3.2.1.1 Modeling Domain ............................ 3-8 3.2.1.2 Simulation Periods ........................... 3-9 3.2.1.3 Model Inputs ................................ 3-9 3.2.1.4 CMAQ Model Evaluation ...................... 3-9 3.2.1.5 Converting CMAQ Outputs to Benefits Inputs ..... 3-13 3.2.1.6 PM Air Quality Results ....................... 3-15 3.2.2 Visibility Degradation Estimates ....................... 3-15 3.2.2.1 Procedures for Estimating Visibility Degradation . 3-17 3.3 References .............................................. 3-23 4. BENEFITS ANALYSIS AND RESULTS ............................ 4-1 4.1 Benefit Analysis—Data and Methods ......................... 4-11 4.1.1 Valuation Concepts ................................. 4-12 4.1.2 Growth in WTP Reflecting National Income Growth Over Time ........................................ 4-14 4.1.3 Methods for Describing Uncertainty .................... 4-18 4.1.4 Demographic Projections ............................. 4-22 4.1.5 Health Benefits Assessment Methods ................... 4-23 4.1.5.1 Selecting Health Endpoints and Epidemiological Effect Estimates ............................ 4-23 4.1.5.2 Uncertainties Associated with Health Impact Functions .................................. 4-36 4.1.5.3 Baseline Health Effect Incidence Rates .......... 4-42 4.1.5.4 Selecting Unit Values for Monetizing Health Endpoints ................................. 4-46 4.1.6 Human Welfare Impact Assessment .................... 4-58 4.1.6.1 Visibility Benefits ........................... 4-58 4.1.6.2 Agricultural, Forestry, and Other Vegetation- Related Benefits ............................ 4-63 4.1.6.3 Benefits from Reductions in Materials Damage .... 4-65 4.1.6.4 Benefits from Reduced Ecosystem Damage ....... 4-66 4.2 Benefits Analysis—Results ................................. 4-67 4.3 Uncertainty in the Benefits Estimates ......................... 4-70 4.4 Discussion .............................................. 4-73 4.5 Cost Effectiveness Analysis ................................. 4-74 4.6 References .............................................. 4-76 iv 5. QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF NONMONETIZED BENEFITS ...... 5-1 5.1 Introduction .............................................. 5-1 5.2 Atmospheric Deposition of Sulfur and Nitrogen—Impacts on Aquatic, Forest, and Coastal Ecosystems ....................... 5-1 5.2.1 Freshwater Acidification .............................. 5-2 5.2.2 Forest Ecosystems ................................... 5-4 5.2.3 Coastal Ecosystems .................................. 5-6 5.2.4 Potential Other Impacts ............................... 5-6 5.3 References ............................................... 5-7 6. PROFILE OF POTENTIALLY AFFECTED INDUSTRY SECTORS ...... 6-1 6.1 Power-Sector Overview ..................................... 6-1 6.1.1 Generation ......................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Transmission ....................................... 6-5 6.1.3 Distribution ........................................ 6-5 6.1.4 Deregulation and Restructuring ......................... 6-6 6.1.5 Pollution and EPA Regulation of Emissions ............... 6-7 6.1.6 Pollution Control Technologies ......................... 6-8 6.1.7 Regulation of the Power Sector ......................... 6-9 6.2 Cement ................................................. 6-11 6.2.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-11 6.2.1.1 Production Process .......................... 6-11 6.2.1.2 Types of Output ............................ 6-12 6.2.1.3 Production Costs ............................ 6-12 6.2.2 The Demand Side ................................... 6-13 6.2.3 Industry Organization: Market Structure, Plants, and Firms . 6-13 6.2.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-15 6.3 Industrial Organic Chemicals ................................ 6-17 6.3.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-17 6.3.1.1 Production Processes ........................ 6-17 6.3.1.2 Types of Output ............................ 6-18 6.3.1.3 Major By-Products and Co-Products ............ 6-18 6.3.1.4 Production Costs ............................ 6-19 6.3.2 The Demand Side ................................... 6-19 6.3.3 Organization of the Industry: Market Concentration, Plants, and Firms ................................... 6-20 6.3.3.1 Capacity Utilization ......................... 6-21 6.3.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-22 6.4 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas ............................ 6-23 6.4.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-23 v 6.4.1.1 Production Processes ........................ 6-23 6.4.1.2 Types of Output ............................ 6-23 6.4.1.3 Major By-products .......................... 6-24 6.4.1.4 Production Costs ............................ 6-24 6.4.2 Demand-Side Characteristics .......................... 6-24 6.4.3 Organization of the Industry: Market Concentration, Plants, and Firms ................................... 6-26 6.4.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-27 6.5 Paper and Allied Products .................................. 6-28 6.5.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-28 6.5.1.1 Production Process .......................... 6-28 6.5.1.2 Types of Output ............................ 6-29 6.5.1.3 Major By-Products and Co-Products ............ 6-29 6.5.1.4 Production Costs ............................ 6-29 6.5.2 The Demand Side ................................... 6-29 6.5.3 Organization of the Industry: Market Concentration, Plants, and Firms ................................... 6-30 6.5.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-32 6.6 Petroleum Refining Industry ................................ 6-33 6.6.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-33 6.6.1.1 Refinery Production Processes/Technology ....... 6-33 6.6.1.2 Potential Changes in Refining Technology Due to EPA Regulation .......................... 6-34 6.6.1.3 Types of Products ........................... 6-35 6.6.1.4 Production Costs ............................ 6-35 6.6.2 The Demand Side ................................... 6-37 6.6.2.1 Uses and Consumers ......................... 6-38 6.6.2.2 Substitution Possibilities in Consumption ........ 6-39 6.6.3 Industry Organization: Market Concentration, Plants, and Firms ......................................... 6-40 6.6.3.1 Market Structure—Concentration ............... 6-40 6.6.3.2 Plants and Firms ............................ 6-40 6.6.3.3 Firm Characteristics ......................... 6-41 6.6.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-42 6.7 Primary Metal Manufacturing ............................... 6-42 6.7.1 The Supply Side: Production and Costs ................. 6-42 6.7.1.1 Production Processes ........................ 6-42 6.7.1.2 Types of Output ............................ 6-46 6.7.1.3 Major By-Products and Co-Products ............ 6-47 6.7.1.4 Production Costs ............................ 6-48 6.7.2 The Demand Side ................................... 6-48 6.7.3 Organization of the Industry: Market Concentration, Plants, and Firms ................................... 6-49 6.7.4 Markets and Trends ................................. 6-51 vi 6.8 References .............................................. 6-52 7. COST, ECONOMIC, AND ENERGY IMPACTS ...................... 7-1 7.1 Modeling Background .....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spectral Clustering on Mercury Hollows: the Dominici Crater Case
    Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1329.pdf SPECTRAL CLUSTERING ON MERCURY HOLLOWS: THE DOMINICI CRATER CASE. A. Lucchetti1, M. Pajola2,3,1, G. Cremonese1, C. Carli4, G. A. Marzo5 and T. Roush3, 1INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35131 Padova, Italy ([email protected] ), 2Universities Space Research Association, NASA NPP Program (Supported by an appointment at NASA Ames Research Center: [email protected]), 3NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 4INAF-IAPS Roma, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali di Roma, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Rome, Italy; 5ENEA Centro Ricerche Casaccia, 00123 Rome, Italy. Introduction: The Mercury Dual Imaging System [8], i.e. incidence angle of 30°, emission angle of 0° (MDIS, [1]) onboard NASA MESSENGER (MErcury and phase angle of 30°. On the photometrically cor- Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and rected dataset we applied a statistical clustering over Ranging) spacecraft, provided the first global coverage the entire dataset based on a K-means partitioning al- of Mercury's surface with varying spatial resolution. gorithm [9]. It was developed and evaluated by [9-11] Early in the mission, high-resolution images showed and makes use of the Calinski and Harabasz criterion that specific areas exhibiting high reflectance and rela- [12] to find the intrinsically natural number of clusters, tive bluer in color were composed of shallow, irregular making the process unsupervised. A natural number of and rimless, flat-floored depressions with bright interi- ten clusters was identified within the crater and its ors and halos, often found on crater walls, rims, floors closest surroundings, see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs
    Case: 18-36082, 02/07/2019, ID: 11183380, DktEntry: 21-12, Page 1 of 80 Case No. 18-36082 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. On Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) DECLARATION OF STEVEN W. RUNNING IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ URGENT MOTION UNDER CIRCUIT RULE 27-3(b) FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JULIA A. OLSON PHILIP L. GREGORY (OSB No. 062230, CSB No. 192642) (CSB No. 95217) Wild Earth Advocates Gregory Law Group 1216 Lincoln Street 1250 Godetia Drive Eugene, OR 97401 Redwood City, CA 94062 Tel: (415) 786-4825 Tel: (650) 278-2957 ANDREA K. RODGERS (OSB No. 041029) Law Offices of Andrea K. Rodgers 3026 NW Esplanade Seattle, WA 98117 Tel: (206) 696-2851 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Case: 18-36082, 02/07/2019, ID: 11183380, DktEntry: 21-12, Page 2 of 80 I, Steven W. Running, hereby declare and if called upon would testify as follows: 1. In this Declaration, I offer my expert opinion about how excessive greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, largely from the burning of fossil fuels, are causing climate change that is dangerously warming the surface of the Earth and causing devastating impacts to the Youth Plaintiffs in this case. Because there is a decades-long delay between the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and the resultant warming of the climate, these Youth Plaintiffs have not yet experienced the full amount of warming that will occur from emissions already released.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Publication Year 2020-12-22T16:29:45Z Acceptance
    Publication Year 2019 Acceptance in OA@INAF 2020-12-22T16:29:45Z Title Global Spectral Properties and Lithology of Mercury: The Example of the Shakespeare (H-03) Quadrangle Authors BOTT, NICOLAS; Doressoundiram, Alain; ZAMBON, Francesca; CARLI, CRISTIAN; GUZZETTA, Laura Giovanna; et al. DOI 10.1029/2019JE005932 Handle http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/29116 Journal JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH (PLANETS) Number 124 RESEARCH ARTICLE Global Spectral Properties and Lithology of Mercury: The 10.1029/2019JE005932 Example of the Shakespeare (H-03) Quadrangle Key Points: • We used the MDIS-WAC data to N. Bott1 , A. Doressoundiram1, F. Zambon2 , C. Carli2 , L. Guzzetta2 , D. Perna3 , produce an eight-color mosaic of the and F. Capaccioni2 Shakespeare quadrangle • We identified spectral units from the 1LESIA-Observatoire de Paris-CNRS-Sorbonne Université-Université Paris-Diderot, Meudon, France, 2Istituto di maps of Shakespeare 3 • We selected two regions of high Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali-INAF, Rome, Italy, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma-INAF, Monte Porzio interest as potential targets for the Catone, Italy BepiColombo mission Abstract The MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging mission showed the Correspondence to: N. Bott, surface of Mercury with an accuracy never reached before. The morphological and spectral analyses [email protected] performed thanks to the data collected between 2008 and 2015 revealed that the Mercurian surface differs from the surface of the Moon, although they look visually very similar. The surface of Mercury is Citation: characterized by a high morphological and spectral variability, suggesting that its stratigraphy is also Bott, N., Doressoundiram, A., heterogeneous. Here, we focused on the Shakespeare (H-03) quadrangle, which is located in the northern Zambon, F., Carli, C., Guzzetta, L., hemisphere of Mercury.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D Mercury Crater Wordsearch V2
    3/24/2019 Word Search Generator :: Create your own printable word find worksheets @ A to Z Teacher Stuff MAKE YOUR OWN WORKSHEETS ONLINE @ WWW.ATOZTEACHERSTUFF.COM NAME:_______________________________ DATE:_____________ Craters on Mercury SICINIMODFIQPVMRQSLJ BEETHOVEN MICHELANGELO BLTVPTSDUOMRCIPDRAEN BYRON RAPHAEL YAPVWYPXSEHAUEHSEVDI CUNNINGHAM SAVAGE RRZAYRKFJROGNIGSNAIA DAMER SHAKESPEARE ORTNPIVOCDTJNRRSKGSW DOMINICI SVEINSDOTTIR NOMGETIKLKEUIAAGLEYT DRISCOLL TOLSTOI PCLOLTVLOEPSNDPNUMQK ELLINGTON VANGOGH YHEGLOAAEIGEGAHQAPRR FAULKNER VIEIRADASILVA NANHIDLNTNNNHSAOFVLA HEMINGWAY VIVALDI VDGYNSDGGMNGAIEDMRAM HOLST GALQGNIEBIMOMLLCNEZG HOMER VMESTIWWKWCANVEKLVRU IMHOTEP ZELTOEPSBOAWMAUHKCIS IZQUIERDO JRQGNVMODREIUQZICDTH JOPLIN SHAKESPEARETOLSTOIOX KIPLING BBCZWAQSZRSLPKOJHLMA LANGE SFRLLOCSIRDIYGSSSTQT LARROCHA FKUIDTISIYYFAIITRODE LENGLE NILPOJHEMINGWAYEGXLM LENNON BEETHOVENRYSKIPLINGV MARKTWAIN 1/2 Mercury Craters: Famous Writers, Artists, and Composers: Location and Sizes Beethoven: Ludwig van Beethoven (1770−1827). German composer and pianist. 20.9°S, 124.2°W; Diameter = 630 km. Byron: Lord Byron (George Byron) (1788−1824). British poet and politician. 8.4°S, 33°W; Diameter = 106.6 km. Cunningham: Imogen Cunningham (1883−1976). American photographer. 30.4°N, 157.1°E; Diameter = 37 km. Damer: Anne Seymour Damer (1748−1828). English sculptor. 36.4°N, 115.8°W; Diameter = 60 km. Dominici: Maria de Dominici (1645−1703). Maltese painter, sculptor, and Carmelite nun. 1.3°N, 36.5°W; Diameter = 20 km. Driscoll: Clara Driscoll (1861−1944). American glass designer. 30.6°N, 33.6°W; Diameter = 30 km. Ellington: Edward Kennedy “Duke” Ellington (1899−1974). American composer, pianist, and jazz orchestra leader. 12.9°S, 26.1°E; Diameter = 216 km. Faulkner: William Faulkner (1897−1962). American writer and Nobel Prize laureate. 8.1°N, 77.0°E; Diameter = 168 km. Hemingway: Ernest Hemingway (1899−1961). American journalist, novelist, and short-story writer. 17.4°N, 3.1°W; Diameter = 126 km.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Lifecycle of Hollows on Mercury
    The Lifecycle of Hollows on Mercury: An Evaluation of Candidate Volatile Phases and a Novel Model of Formation. 1 1 2 3 M. S. Phillips , J. E. Moersch , C. E. Viviano , J. P. Emery 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 2Planetary Exploration Group, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory 3Department of Astronomy and Planetary Sciences, Northern Arizona University Corresponding author: Michael Phillips ([email protected]) Keywords: Mercury, hollows, thermal model, fumarole. Abstract On Mercury, high-reflectance, flat-floored depressions called hollows are observed nearly globally within low-reflectance material, one of Mercury’s major color units. Hollows are thought to be young, or even currently active, features that form via sublimation, or a “sublimation-like” process. The apparent abundance of sulfides within LRM combined with spectral detections of sulfides associated with hollows suggests that sulfides may be the phase responsible for hollow formation. Despite the association of sulfides with hollows, it is still not clear whether sulfides are the hollow-forming phase. To better understand which phase(s) might be responsible for hollow formation, we calculated sublimation rates for 57 candidate hollow-forming volatile phases from the surface of Mercury and as a function of depth beneath regolith lag deposits of various thicknesses. We found that stearic acid (C18H36O2), fullerenes (C60, C70), and elemental sulfur (S) have the appropriate thermophysical properties to explain hollow formation. Stearic acid and fullerenes are implausible hollow-forming phases because they are unlikely to have been delivered to or generated on Mercury in high enough volume to account for hollows.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Uavs)
    Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Gonzalo Pajares Abstract Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) is presently in continuous battery or energy system’s capabilities. There are vehicles with development at a rapid pace. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles the ability to fly at medium and high altitudes with flight dura- (UAVs) or more extensively Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) tions ranging from minutes to hours, i.e., from five minutes are platforms considered under the RPAs paradigm. Simulta- to 30 hours. The horizontal range of the different platforms neously, the development of sensors and instruments to be is also limited by the power of the communications system, installed onboard such platforms is growing exponentially. which should ensure contact with a ground station, again These two factors together have led to the increasing use of ranging from meters to kilometers. Communications using sat- these platforms and sensors for remote sensing applications ellite input can also be used, expanding the operational range. with new potential. Thus, the overall goal of this paper is There are several different categorizations for unmanned aerial to provide a panoramic overview about the current status platforms depending on the criterion applied (Nonami et al., of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial 2010). Perhaps the most extensive and current classifications platforms equipped with a set of specific sensors and instru- can be found in Blyenburgh (2014) with annual revisions. ments. First, some examples of typical platforms used in An auto platform or remotely controlled platform through remote sensing are provided. Second, a description of sensors a remote station together with a communication system, and technologies is explored which are onboard instruments including the corresponding protocol, constitutes what is specifically intended to capture data for remote sensing ap- known an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) (Gertler, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Waning Sword E Conversion Imagery and Celestial Myth in Beowulf DWARD the Waning Sword Conversion Imagery and EDWARD PETTIT P
    The Waning Sword E Conversion Imagery and Celestial Myth in Beowulf DWARD The Waning Sword Conversion Imagery and EDWARD PETTIT P The image of a giant sword mel� ng stands at the structural and thema� c heart of the Old ETTIT Celestial Myth in Beowulf English heroic poem Beowulf. This me� culously researched book inves� gates the nature and signifi cance of this golden-hilted weapon and its likely rela� ves within Beowulf and beyond, drawing on the fi elds of Old English and Old Norse language and literature, liturgy, archaeology, astronomy, folklore and compara� ve mythology. In Part I, Pe� t explores the complex of connota� ons surrounding this image (from icicles to candles and crosses) by examining a range of medieval sources, and argues that the giant sword may func� on as a visual mo� f in which pre-Chris� an Germanic concepts and prominent Chris� an symbols coalesce. In Part II, Pe� t inves� gates the broader Germanic background to this image, especially in rela� on to the god Ing/Yngvi-Freyr, and explores the capacity of myths to recur and endure across � me. Drawing on an eclec� c range of narra� ve and linguis� c evidence from Northern European texts, and on archaeological discoveries, Pe� t suggests that the T image of the giant sword, and the characters and events associated with it, may refl ect HE an elemental struggle between the sun and the moon, ar� culated through an underlying W myth about the the� and repossession of sunlight. ANING The Waning Sword: Conversion Imagery and Celesti al Myth in Beowulf is a welcome contribu� on to the overlapping fi elds of Beowulf-scholarship, Old Norse-Icelandic literature and Germanic philology.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationale for Bepicolombo Studies of Mercury's Surface and Composition
    Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00694-7 Rationale for BepiColombo Studies of Mercury’s Surface and Composition David A. Rothery1 · Matteo Massironi2 · Giulia Alemanno3 · Océane Barraud4 · Sebastien Besse5 · Nicolas Bott4 · Rosario Brunetto6 · Emma Bunce7 · Paul Byrne8 · Fabrizio Capaccioni9 · Maria Teresa Capria9 · Cristian Carli9 · Bernard Charlier10 · Thomas Cornet5 · Gabriele Cremonese11 · Mario D’Amore3 · M. Cristina De Sanctis9 · Alain Doressoundiram4 · Luigi Ferranti12 · Gianrico Filacchione9 · Valentina Galluzzi9 · Lorenza Giacomini9 · Manuel Grande13 · Laura G. Guzzetta9 · Jörn Helbert3 · Daniel Heyner14 · Harald Hiesinger15 · Hauke Hussmann3 · Ryuku Hyodo16 · Tomas Kohout17 · Alexander Kozyrev18 · Maxim Litvak18 · Alice Lucchetti11 · Alexey Malakhov18 · Christopher Malliband1 · Paolo Mancinelli19 · Julia Martikainen20,21 · Adrian Martindale7 · Alessandro Maturilli3 · Anna Milillo22 · Igor Mitrofanov18 · Maxim Mokrousov18 · Andreas Morlok15 · Karri Muinonen20,23 · Olivier Namur24 · Alan Owens25 · Larry R. Nittler26 · Joana S. Oliveira27,28 · Pasquale Palumbo29 · Maurizio Pajola11 · David L. Pegg1 · Antti Penttilä20 · Romolo Politi9 · Francesco Quarati30 · Cristina Re11 · Anton Sanin18 · Rita Schulz25 · Claudia Stangarone3 · Aleksandra Stojic15 · Vladislav Tretiyakov18 · Timo Väisänen20 · Indhu Varatharajan3 · Iris Weber15 · Jack Wright1 · Peter Wurz31 · Francesca Zambon22 Received: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2020 / Published online: 2 June 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 The BepiColombo mission
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C. Solomon , Larry R. Nittler , Brian J. Anderson Index More Information INDEX 253 Mathilde, 196 BepiColombo, 46, 109, 134, 136, 138, 279, 314, 315, 366, 403, 463, 2P/Encke, 392 487, 488, 535, 544, 546, 547, 548–562, 563, 564, 565 4 Vesta, 195, 196, 350 BELA. See BepiColombo: BepiColombo Laser Altimeter 433 Eros, 195, 196, 339 BepiColombo Laser Altimeter, 554, 557, 558 gravity assists, 555 activation energy, 409, 412 gyroscope, 556 adiabat, 38 HGA. See BepiColombo: high-gain antenna adiabatic decompression melting, 38, 60, 168, 186 high-gain antenna, 556, 560 adiabatic gradient, 96 ISA. See BepiColombo: Italian Spring Accelerometer admittance, 64, 65, 74, 271 Italian Spring Accelerometer, 549, 554, 557, 558 aerodynamic fractionation, 507, 509 Magnetospheric Orbiter Sunshield and Interface, 552, 553, 555, 560 Airy isostasy, 64 MDM. See BepiColombo: Mercury Dust Monitor Al. See aluminum Mercury Dust Monitor, 554, 560–561 Al exosphere. See aluminum exosphere Mercury flybys, 555 albedo, 192, 198 Mercury Gamma-ray and Neutron Spectrometer, 554, 558 compared with other bodies, 196 Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer, 558 Alfvén Mach number, 430, 433, 442, 463 Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, aluminum, 36, 38, 147, 177, 178–184, 185, 186, 209, 559–561 210 Mercury Orbiter Radio Science Experiment, 554, 556–558 aluminum exosphere, 371, 399–400, 403, 423–424 Mercury Planetary Orbiter, 366, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, ground-based observations, 423 556–559, 560, 562 andesite, 179, 182, 183 Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment, 554, 561 Andrade creep function, 100 Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager, 554, 561 Andrade rheological model, 100 Mercury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer, 366, 554, 557–558 anorthosite, 30, 210 Mercury Transfer Module, 552, 553, 555, 561–562 anticline, 70, 251 MERTIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Suor Maria De Dominici
    Suor Maria de Dominici: the first Maltese female artist and her presence in Late Baroque Malta and Rome Nadette Xuereb Supervisor: Professor Keith Sciberras A dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in History of Art presented in the Department of History of Art, Faculty of Arts, University of Malta. May 2017 University of Malta Library – Electronic Thesis & Dissertations (ETD) Repository The copyright of this thesis/dissertation belongs to the author. The author’s rights in respect of this work are as defined by the Copyright Act (Chapter 415) of the Laws of Malta or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this full-text thesis/dissertation and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Act provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. Declaration of Authenticity I, the undersigned, Nadette Xuereb, declare that this dissertation is my original work, gathered and utilized to fulfil the purposes and objectives of this study, and has not been previously submitted to any other university. I also declare that the publications, articles, and newspapers have been personally consulted. ________________________ Nadette Xuereb May 2017 ii To my family, friends, and all those who helped me become the woman I am today. iii iv Contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier De Presse Trois Soeurs.Pdf
    sommaire informations pratiques p. 2 distribution p. 3 note d’intention p. 4 biographies p. 7 Anton Tchekhov, texte p. 7 Christian Benedetti, mise en scène p. 7 Elsa Granat, assistante à la mise en scène p. 8 distribution p. 9 Antoine Amblard p. 9 Alexis Barbosa p. 9 Jenny Bellay p. 9 Christine Brücher p. 9 Christophe Carotenuto p. 10 Philippe Crubézy p. 10 Daniel Delabesse p. 10 Marie-Sophie Ferdane p. 11 Laurent Huont p. 11 Jean-Pierre Moulin p. 12 Nina Renaux p. 12 Stéphane Schoukroun p. 13 la saison 2014-2015 de l’Athénée p. 14 informations pratiques du 29 janvier au 14 février 2015 relâche les lundis et dimanches matinée exceptionnelle : dimanche 8 février à 16h grande salle tarifs : de 8 à 34 € - plein tarif : de 16 à 34 € - demi-tarif : de 8 à 17 € (moins de 30 ans, demandeurs d’emploi, bénéficiaires du RSA) - e-tarif : de 14 à 31 € - groupes / collectivités : de 20 à 27 € (à partir de 10 personnes) dialogues À l'issue de la représentation, Christian Benedetti et l'équipe artistique vous retrouvent au foyer-bar pour échanger sur le spectacle. mardi 3 février 2015 I entrée libre tournée du spectacle le vendredi 6 mars 2015 au théâtre des Quatre saisons de Gradignan (33) le samedi 14 mars 2015 au Centre culturel des portes de l’Essonne, Juvisy (91) Athénée Théâtre Louis-Jouvet square de l’Opéra Louis-Jouvet I 7 rue Boudreau I 75009 Paris M° Opéra, Havre-Caumartin I RER A Auber réservations : 01 53 05 19 19 - www.athenee-theatre.com Venez tous les jours au théâtre avec le blog de l’Athénée : blog.athenee-theatre.com et rejoignez nous sur Facebook et Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimesis International
    MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE n. 2 FICTIONAL ARTWORKS Literary Ékphrasis and the Invention of Images Edited by Valeria Cammarata and Valentina Mignano MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL This book is published with the support of the University of Palermo, “Department of Cultures and Society”, PRIN fund 2009, “Letteratura e cultura visuale”, Prof. M. Cometa. © 2016 – MIMESIS INTERNATIONAL www.mimesisinternational.com e-mail: [email protected] Isbn: 9788869770586 Book series: Literature n. 2 © MIM Edizioni Srl P.I. C.F. 02419370305 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 9 Michele Cometa Daniela Barcella BEINGS OF LANGUAGE, BEINGS OF DESIRE: FOR A PSYCHOANALYTICAL READING OF RAYMOND ROUSSEL’S LOCUS SOLUS 11 Michele Bertolini THE WORD THAT YOU CAN SEE: VISUAL AND SCENIC STRATEGIES IN LA RELIGIEUSE BY DIDEROT 25 Valeria Cammarata THE IMPOSSIBLE PORTRAIT. GEORGES PEREC AND HIS CONDOTTIERE 43 Clizia Centorrino THE DREAM-IMAGE IN GRADIVA’S GAIT FROM POMPEII TO MARRAKESH 59 Roberta Coglitore MOVING THE LIMITS OF REPRESENTATION: INVENTION, SEQUEL AND CONTINUATION IN BUZZATI’S MIRACLES 75 Duccio Colombo CAN PAINTINGS TALK? AN ÉKPHRASTIC POLEMIC IN POST-STALIN RUSSIA 87 Giuseppe Di Liberti HOMO PICTOR: ÉKPHRASIS AS A FRONTIER OF THE IMAGE IN THOMAS BERNHARD’S FROST 113 Mariaelisa Dimino BETWEEN ONTOPHANY AND POIESIS: HUGO VON HOFMANNSTHAL’S DANCING STATUES 127 Floriana Giallombardo THE OPTICAL WONDERS OF AN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY MICROSCOPIST: GEOMETRIC CRYSTALS AND GOTHIC RÊVERIES 137 Tommaso Guariento DESCRIPTION AND IDOLATRY OF THE IMAGES: ROBERTO CALASSO’S
    [Show full text]