Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Spectral Clustering on Mercury Hollows: the Dominici Crater Case
Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1329.pdf SPECTRAL CLUSTERING ON MERCURY HOLLOWS: THE DOMINICI CRATER CASE. A. Lucchetti1, M. Pajola2,3,1, G. Cremonese1, C. Carli4, G. A. Marzo5 and T. Roush3, 1INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35131 Padova, Italy ([email protected] ), 2Universities Space Research Association, NASA NPP Program (Supported by an appointment at NASA Ames Research Center: [email protected]), 3NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 4INAF-IAPS Roma, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali di Roma, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Rome, Italy; 5ENEA Centro Ricerche Casaccia, 00123 Rome, Italy. Introduction: The Mercury Dual Imaging System [8], i.e. incidence angle of 30°, emission angle of 0° (MDIS, [1]) onboard NASA MESSENGER (MErcury and phase angle of 30°. On the photometrically cor- Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and rected dataset we applied a statistical clustering over Ranging) spacecraft, provided the first global coverage the entire dataset based on a K-means partitioning al- of Mercury's surface with varying spatial resolution. gorithm [9]. It was developed and evaluated by [9-11] Early in the mission, high-resolution images showed and makes use of the Calinski and Harabasz criterion that specific areas exhibiting high reflectance and rela- [12] to find the intrinsically natural number of clusters, tive bluer in color were composed of shallow, irregular making the process unsupervised. A natural number of and rimless, flat-floored depressions with bright interi- ten clusters was identified within the crater and its ors and halos, often found on crater walls, rims, floors closest surroundings, see Fig. -
2019 Publication Year 2020-12-22T16:29:45Z Acceptance
Publication Year 2019 Acceptance in OA@INAF 2020-12-22T16:29:45Z Title Global Spectral Properties and Lithology of Mercury: The Example of the Shakespeare (H-03) Quadrangle Authors BOTT, NICOLAS; Doressoundiram, Alain; ZAMBON, Francesca; CARLI, CRISTIAN; GUZZETTA, Laura Giovanna; et al. DOI 10.1029/2019JE005932 Handle http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/29116 Journal JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH (PLANETS) Number 124 RESEARCH ARTICLE Global Spectral Properties and Lithology of Mercury: The 10.1029/2019JE005932 Example of the Shakespeare (H-03) Quadrangle Key Points: • We used the MDIS-WAC data to N. Bott1 , A. Doressoundiram1, F. Zambon2 , C. Carli2 , L. Guzzetta2 , D. Perna3 , produce an eight-color mosaic of the and F. Capaccioni2 Shakespeare quadrangle • We identified spectral units from the 1LESIA-Observatoire de Paris-CNRS-Sorbonne Université-Université Paris-Diderot, Meudon, France, 2Istituto di maps of Shakespeare 3 • We selected two regions of high Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali-INAF, Rome, Italy, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma-INAF, Monte Porzio interest as potential targets for the Catone, Italy BepiColombo mission Abstract The MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging mission showed the Correspondence to: N. Bott, surface of Mercury with an accuracy never reached before. The morphological and spectral analyses [email protected] performed thanks to the data collected between 2008 and 2015 revealed that the Mercurian surface differs from the surface of the Moon, although they look visually very similar. The surface of Mercury is Citation: characterized by a high morphological and spectral variability, suggesting that its stratigraphy is also Bott, N., Doressoundiram, A., heterogeneous. Here, we focused on the Shakespeare (H-03) quadrangle, which is located in the northern Zambon, F., Carli, C., Guzzetta, L., hemisphere of Mercury. -
2D Mercury Crater Wordsearch V2
3/24/2019 Word Search Generator :: Create your own printable word find worksheets @ A to Z Teacher Stuff MAKE YOUR OWN WORKSHEETS ONLINE @ WWW.ATOZTEACHERSTUFF.COM NAME:_______________________________ DATE:_____________ Craters on Mercury SICINIMODFIQPVMRQSLJ BEETHOVEN MICHELANGELO BLTVPTSDUOMRCIPDRAEN BYRON RAPHAEL YAPVWYPXSEHAUEHSEVDI CUNNINGHAM SAVAGE RRZAYRKFJROGNIGSNAIA DAMER SHAKESPEARE ORTNPIVOCDTJNRRSKGSW DOMINICI SVEINSDOTTIR NOMGETIKLKEUIAAGLEYT DRISCOLL TOLSTOI PCLOLTVLOEPSNDPNUMQK ELLINGTON VANGOGH YHEGLOAAEIGEGAHQAPRR FAULKNER VIEIRADASILVA NANHIDLNTNNNHSAOFVLA HEMINGWAY VIVALDI VDGYNSDGGMNGAIEDMRAM HOLST GALQGNIEBIMOMLLCNEZG HOMER VMESTIWWKWCANVEKLVRU IMHOTEP ZELTOEPSBOAWMAUHKCIS IZQUIERDO JRQGNVMODREIUQZICDTH JOPLIN SHAKESPEARETOLSTOIOX KIPLING BBCZWAQSZRSLPKOJHLMA LANGE SFRLLOCSIRDIYGSSSTQT LARROCHA FKUIDTISIYYFAIITRODE LENGLE NILPOJHEMINGWAYEGXLM LENNON BEETHOVENRYSKIPLINGV MARKTWAIN 1/2 Mercury Craters: Famous Writers, Artists, and Composers: Location and Sizes Beethoven: Ludwig van Beethoven (1770−1827). German composer and pianist. 20.9°S, 124.2°W; Diameter = 630 km. Byron: Lord Byron (George Byron) (1788−1824). British poet and politician. 8.4°S, 33°W; Diameter = 106.6 km. Cunningham: Imogen Cunningham (1883−1976). American photographer. 30.4°N, 157.1°E; Diameter = 37 km. Damer: Anne Seymour Damer (1748−1828). English sculptor. 36.4°N, 115.8°W; Diameter = 60 km. Dominici: Maria de Dominici (1645−1703). Maltese painter, sculptor, and Carmelite nun. 1.3°N, 36.5°W; Diameter = 20 km. Driscoll: Clara Driscoll (1861−1944). American glass designer. 30.6°N, 33.6°W; Diameter = 30 km. Ellington: Edward Kennedy “Duke” Ellington (1899−1974). American composer, pianist, and jazz orchestra leader. 12.9°S, 26.1°E; Diameter = 216 km. Faulkner: William Faulkner (1897−1962). American writer and Nobel Prize laureate. 8.1°N, 77.0°E; Diameter = 168 km. Hemingway: Ernest Hemingway (1899−1961). American journalist, novelist, and short-story writer. 17.4°N, 3.1°W; Diameter = 126 km. -
SILVER SLOPES: PRESERVING NORTH AMERICA's SKI LODGES by WILLIAM CHAD BLACKWELL (Under the Direction of Wayde Brown) ABSTRACT
SILVER SLOPES: PRESERVING NORTH AMERICA’S SKI LODGES by WILLIAM CHAD BLACKWELL (Under the Direction of Wayde Brown) ABSTRACT An examination of the unique case for the historic preservation of the ski lodges of North America. A brief history and evolution of ski resorts addresses the historic significance of ski lodges as a cultural resource. Case studies of five ski lodges provide a representative look at this unique resource. An analysis of the ski lodge as a cultural resource, its place as a twentieth century building type, and the ramifications in a preservation context concludes the argument. INDEX WORDS: Historic preservation, Ski lodges, Twentieth century building types, Sun Valley Lodge, Sun Valley Inn, Challenger Inn, Timberline Lodge, Chalet des Voyageurs, Mont Tremblant Inn, Berthoud Pass Lodge, Mount Ashland Lodge SILVER SLOPES: PRESERVING NORTH AMERICA’S SKI LODGES by WILLIAM CHAD BLACKWELL BA, History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 William Chad Blackwell All Rights Reserved SILVER SLOPES: PRESERVING NORTH AMERICA’S SKI LODGES by WILLIAM CHAD BLACKWELL Major Professor: Wayde Brown Committee: Pratt Cassity John Kissane Michael Tarrant Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2005 DEDICATION Dedicated to my mother and father who, on many summer vacations to historic sites, fanned my interest in historic places. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was made more difficult by the geographic distance between the author and the subject matter. -
1 the Lifecycle of Hollows on Mercury
The Lifecycle of Hollows on Mercury: An Evaluation of Candidate Volatile Phases and a Novel Model of Formation. 1 1 2 3 M. S. Phillips , J. E. Moersch , C. E. Viviano , J. P. Emery 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 2Planetary Exploration Group, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory 3Department of Astronomy and Planetary Sciences, Northern Arizona University Corresponding author: Michael Phillips ([email protected]) Keywords: Mercury, hollows, thermal model, fumarole. Abstract On Mercury, high-reflectance, flat-floored depressions called hollows are observed nearly globally within low-reflectance material, one of Mercury’s major color units. Hollows are thought to be young, or even currently active, features that form via sublimation, or a “sublimation-like” process. The apparent abundance of sulfides within LRM combined with spectral detections of sulfides associated with hollows suggests that sulfides may be the phase responsible for hollow formation. Despite the association of sulfides with hollows, it is still not clear whether sulfides are the hollow-forming phase. To better understand which phase(s) might be responsible for hollow formation, we calculated sublimation rates for 57 candidate hollow-forming volatile phases from the surface of Mercury and as a function of depth beneath regolith lag deposits of various thicknesses. We found that stearic acid (C18H36O2), fullerenes (C60, C70), and elemental sulfur (S) have the appropriate thermophysical properties to explain hollow formation. Stearic acid and fullerenes are implausible hollow-forming phases because they are unlikely to have been delivered to or generated on Mercury in high enough volume to account for hollows. -
Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Uavs)
Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Gonzalo Pajares Abstract Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) is presently in continuous battery or energy system’s capabilities. There are vehicles with development at a rapid pace. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles the ability to fly at medium and high altitudes with flight dura- (UAVs) or more extensively Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) tions ranging from minutes to hours, i.e., from five minutes are platforms considered under the RPAs paradigm. Simulta- to 30 hours. The horizontal range of the different platforms neously, the development of sensors and instruments to be is also limited by the power of the communications system, installed onboard such platforms is growing exponentially. which should ensure contact with a ground station, again These two factors together have led to the increasing use of ranging from meters to kilometers. Communications using sat- these platforms and sensors for remote sensing applications ellite input can also be used, expanding the operational range. with new potential. Thus, the overall goal of this paper is There are several different categorizations for unmanned aerial to provide a panoramic overview about the current status platforms depending on the criterion applied (Nonami et al., of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial 2010). Perhaps the most extensive and current classifications platforms equipped with a set of specific sensors and instru- can be found in Blyenburgh (2014) with annual revisions. ments. First, some examples of typical platforms used in An auto platform or remotely controlled platform through remote sensing are provided. Second, a description of sensors a remote station together with a communication system, and technologies is explored which are onboard instruments including the corresponding protocol, constitutes what is specifically intended to capture data for remote sensing ap- known an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) (Gertler, 2012). -
The Waning Sword E Conversion Imagery and Celestial Myth in Beowulf DWARD the Waning Sword Conversion Imagery and EDWARD PETTIT P
The Waning Sword E Conversion Imagery and Celestial Myth in Beowulf DWARD The Waning Sword Conversion Imagery and EDWARD PETTIT P The image of a giant sword mel� ng stands at the structural and thema� c heart of the Old ETTIT Celestial Myth in Beowulf English heroic poem Beowulf. This me� culously researched book inves� gates the nature and signifi cance of this golden-hilted weapon and its likely rela� ves within Beowulf and beyond, drawing on the fi elds of Old English and Old Norse language and literature, liturgy, archaeology, astronomy, folklore and compara� ve mythology. In Part I, Pe� t explores the complex of connota� ons surrounding this image (from icicles to candles and crosses) by examining a range of medieval sources, and argues that the giant sword may func� on as a visual mo� f in which pre-Chris� an Germanic concepts and prominent Chris� an symbols coalesce. In Part II, Pe� t inves� gates the broader Germanic background to this image, especially in rela� on to the god Ing/Yngvi-Freyr, and explores the capacity of myths to recur and endure across � me. Drawing on an eclec� c range of narra� ve and linguis� c evidence from Northern European texts, and on archaeological discoveries, Pe� t suggests that the T image of the giant sword, and the characters and events associated with it, may refl ect HE an elemental struggle between the sun and the moon, ar� culated through an underlying W myth about the the� and repossession of sunlight. ANING The Waning Sword: Conversion Imagery and Celesti al Myth in Beowulf is a welcome contribu� on to the overlapping fi elds of Beowulf-scholarship, Old Norse-Icelandic literature and Germanic philology. -
Visibility Rule and BART for Regional Haze, Final
Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Visibility Rule or the Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations Under the Regional Haze Regulations EPA-452/R-05-004 June 2005 Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Visibility Rule or the Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations Under the Regional Haze Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division, Emission, Monitoring, and Analysis Division and Clean Air Markets Division CONTENTS Section Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ 1-1 1.1 Background .............................................. 1-1 1.2 Results .................................................. 1-2 1.2.1 Health Benefits ...................................... 1-4 1.2.2 Welfare Benefits .................................... 1-7 1.2.3 Uncertainty in the Benefits Estimates .................... 1-7 1.3 Not All Benefits Quantified .................................. 1-8 1.4 Costs and Economic Impacts ................................ 1-10 1.5 Limitations .............................................. 1-11 1.6 References .............................................. 1-12 2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................ 2-1 2.1 Background .............................................. 2-1 2.2 Regulated Source Categories ................................. 2-3 2.3 Control Scenarios.......................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Electric Generating -
Rationale for Bepicolombo Studies of Mercury's Surface and Composition
Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00694-7 Rationale for BepiColombo Studies of Mercury’s Surface and Composition David A. Rothery1 · Matteo Massironi2 · Giulia Alemanno3 · Océane Barraud4 · Sebastien Besse5 · Nicolas Bott4 · Rosario Brunetto6 · Emma Bunce7 · Paul Byrne8 · Fabrizio Capaccioni9 · Maria Teresa Capria9 · Cristian Carli9 · Bernard Charlier10 · Thomas Cornet5 · Gabriele Cremonese11 · Mario D’Amore3 · M. Cristina De Sanctis9 · Alain Doressoundiram4 · Luigi Ferranti12 · Gianrico Filacchione9 · Valentina Galluzzi9 · Lorenza Giacomini9 · Manuel Grande13 · Laura G. Guzzetta9 · Jörn Helbert3 · Daniel Heyner14 · Harald Hiesinger15 · Hauke Hussmann3 · Ryuku Hyodo16 · Tomas Kohout17 · Alexander Kozyrev18 · Maxim Litvak18 · Alice Lucchetti11 · Alexey Malakhov18 · Christopher Malliband1 · Paolo Mancinelli19 · Julia Martikainen20,21 · Adrian Martindale7 · Alessandro Maturilli3 · Anna Milillo22 · Igor Mitrofanov18 · Maxim Mokrousov18 · Andreas Morlok15 · Karri Muinonen20,23 · Olivier Namur24 · Alan Owens25 · Larry R. Nittler26 · Joana S. Oliveira27,28 · Pasquale Palumbo29 · Maurizio Pajola11 · David L. Pegg1 · Antti Penttilä20 · Romolo Politi9 · Francesco Quarati30 · Cristina Re11 · Anton Sanin18 · Rita Schulz25 · Claudia Stangarone3 · Aleksandra Stojic15 · Vladislav Tretiyakov18 · Timo Väisänen20 · Indhu Varatharajan3 · Iris Weber15 · Jack Wright1 · Peter Wurz31 · Francesca Zambon22 Received: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2020 / Published online: 2 June 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 The BepiColombo mission -
Updated Source Water Assessment
Updated Source Water Assessment Ashland Water Department PWS #4100047 March 2018 Prepared for: City of Ashland Ashland Water Department Prepared by: Department of Environmental Quality Agency Headquarters 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 600 Kate Brown, Governor Portland, OR 97232 (503) 229-5696 FAX (503) 229-6124 TTY 711 March 22, 2018 Michael Faught, Public Works Director Greg Hunter, Water Plant Supervisor Ashland Water Department 20 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 Re: Updated Source Water Assessment for PWS # 4100047 Dear Mr. Faught and Mr. Hunter, On behalf of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is pleased to provide your community with important information in this Updated Source Water Assessment. The updated assessment is intended to provide information and resources to assist you and your community to implement local drinking water protection efforts. Since the first source water assessments were completed in 2005, state agencies have significantly expanded analytical capabilities, including more detailed data for analyzing natural characteristics and potential pollutant sources. DEQ is currently completing the updated assessments for surface water systems and OHA is updating the groundwater system assessments. As you know, assuring safe drinking water depends on public water suppliers implementing multiple successful practices. First, protect the drinking water source. Second, practice effective water treatment. Third, conduct regular monitoring for contaminants to assure safety. Fourth, protect the distribution system piping and finished water storage from recontamination. Finally, practice competent water system operation, maintenance, and construction. These practices are collectively called “multiple barrier public health protection”. Source water protection is an important first step because starting with the best possible quality source water helps assure that water treatment can be effective at all times. -
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15445-2 — Mercury Edited by Sean C. Solomon , Larry R. Nittler , Brian J. Anderson Index More Information INDEX 253 Mathilde, 196 BepiColombo, 46, 109, 134, 136, 138, 279, 314, 315, 366, 403, 463, 2P/Encke, 392 487, 488, 535, 544, 546, 547, 548–562, 563, 564, 565 4 Vesta, 195, 196, 350 BELA. See BepiColombo: BepiColombo Laser Altimeter 433 Eros, 195, 196, 339 BepiColombo Laser Altimeter, 554, 557, 558 gravity assists, 555 activation energy, 409, 412 gyroscope, 556 adiabat, 38 HGA. See BepiColombo: high-gain antenna adiabatic decompression melting, 38, 60, 168, 186 high-gain antenna, 556, 560 adiabatic gradient, 96 ISA. See BepiColombo: Italian Spring Accelerometer admittance, 64, 65, 74, 271 Italian Spring Accelerometer, 549, 554, 557, 558 aerodynamic fractionation, 507, 509 Magnetospheric Orbiter Sunshield and Interface, 552, 553, 555, 560 Airy isostasy, 64 MDM. See BepiColombo: Mercury Dust Monitor Al. See aluminum Mercury Dust Monitor, 554, 560–561 Al exosphere. See aluminum exosphere Mercury flybys, 555 albedo, 192, 198 Mercury Gamma-ray and Neutron Spectrometer, 554, 558 compared with other bodies, 196 Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer, 558 Alfvén Mach number, 430, 433, 442, 463 Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, aluminum, 36, 38, 147, 177, 178–184, 185, 186, 209, 559–561 210 Mercury Orbiter Radio Science Experiment, 554, 556–558 aluminum exosphere, 371, 399–400, 403, 423–424 Mercury Planetary Orbiter, 366, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, ground-based observations, 423 556–559, 560, 562 andesite, 179, 182, 183 Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment, 554, 561 Andrade creep function, 100 Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager, 554, 561 Andrade rheological model, 100 Mercury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer, 366, 554, 557–558 anorthosite, 30, 210 Mercury Transfer Module, 552, 553, 555, 561–562 anticline, 70, 251 MERTIS. -
Jackson County Rural Living Handbook
Jackson County Rural Living Handbook A Resource for Country Living and Land Stewardship 89 Alder Street, Central Point OR 97502 (541) 423-6165 www.jswcd.org Resource Directory Jackson Soil & Water Conservation District (541) 423-6165 www.jswcd.org United States Agencies Irrigation Districts Department of Agriculture, Farm Services Agency Talent Irrigation District ......... (541) 535-1529 www.fsa.usda.gov ................. (541) 776-4270 Medford Irrigation District ....... (541) 899-9913 Natural Resources Conservation Service Rogue River Valley www.nrcs.usda.gov ................ (541) 776-4270 Irrigation District .................. (541) 773-6127 US Forest Service Eagle Point Irrigation District ... (541) 826-3411 www.fs.fed.us . .................... (541) 618-2200 Gold Hill Irrigation District ...... (541) 582-1802 Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Watershed Council www.or.blm.gov ................... (541) 618-2200 Applegate ........................... (541) 899-9982 US Fish & Wildlife Service Bear Creek ......................... (541) 840-1810 www.fws.gov ....................... (541) 957-3474 Upper Rogue ....................... (541) 878-1446 Middle Rogue ....................... (541) 474-6799 Jackson County Depts. Seven Basins ....................... (541) 830-3781 Animal Control ..................... (541) 774-6655 Little Butte Creek ................. (541) 826-2908 Exposition Park ..................... (541) 774-8270 Website ............. www.oregonwatershed.com Open Burning ......................