DOCSLIB.ORG

ARB Approved Meeting Minutes 3-8-2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARB Approved Meeting Minutes 3-8-2018 APPROVED MINUTES March 8, 2018 THE FAIRFAX COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Fairfax County Government Center Conference Rooms 4 & 5, 6:30 PM Members Present: Members Excused: Staff Present: John A. Burns, FAIA, Chairman Laura Arseneau, Christopher Daniel, Vice Chairman Fairfax Department of Jason Sutphin Planning and Zoning Michele Aubry, Treasurer Casey Judge, Recording Secretary Joseph Plumpe, ASLA Susan Notkins, AIA Elise Murray Richard Bierce, AIA* Robert W. Mobley, AIA* *Arrived after the meeting began Mr. Burns opened the March 8, 2018 meeting of the Architectural Review Board (ARB) at 6:30 p.m. in Rooms 4 & 5 of the Government Center; Ms. Murray read the opening statement of purpose. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Ms. Notkins made a motion to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sutphin and approved on a vote of 7-0. INTRODUCTION/RECOGNITION OF GUESTS: Denice Dressel, Heritage Resources Staff, DPZ Laura Gori, Office of the County Attorney CONSENT CALENDAR ACTION ITEMS: None proposed. ITEMS FOR ACTION: 1. ARB-18-LOR-02: Proposal for Phase 2A site plans, public improvement plan and guard tower at the Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area, tax map # 107-1-((09)). The 2001 Lorton Correctional Complex MOA stipulates that the ARB review undertakings within the area eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and that the area within the Eligible District is subject to review as stipulated in Section 7-200 of the Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance. Section 7-200 of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that: 1) plans shall be referred to the ARB for its review and recommendation and 2) ARB approval shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. At its January 2017 meeting a workshop was held with the ARB on Phase 2A of the development for the initial adaptive re-use of the seven buildings within the penitentiary wall and drafts of the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Lighting Plan, and architectural sheets of the proposed façade changes. The applicant will submit materials to the Lorton Heritage Society and VDHR as required by the MOA. Mr. Jim Perry, Elm Street Development, Inc., and Mr. Dave Kaul, AIA, The Alexander Company, represent the proposal. Mount Vernon Supervisory District ARB March 8, 2018 1 Presentation made by Mr. Perkins with Elm Street Development: *Mr. Burns and Mr. Plumpe recused themselves. Mr. Daniel assumed the chair position. • The same presentation from the workshop session was presented with the addition of one slide for lighting details. The parking for Phase 2A would only be interim parking for the temporary storage use of the building. The prison yard was relatively flat already, so there would be minimal road improvements for fire access and minimal grading. The landscaping would be minimal and would not obscure the views of the guard tower. The proposed lighting was the same site lighting that was approved and had been implemented in Phase I, which included full cut-off minimalist LED light fixtures. When speaking about the public improvement plan that covered Snowden Ashford Road, this road was VDOT-maintained, and the grading and geometry had to meet their standards. The lighting proposed was the traditional cobra-head fixture, which was the only approved fixture that VDOT would allow in the right-of-way. Historically, this type of light fixture was used extensively across the campus, as it was a very utilitarian light fixture. Having it along Snowden Ashford was consistent with the lighting used on-site in the past. Discussion: • Ms. Notkins asked if there would be a light fixture on each townhouse. o That would be a part of the architectural approval for the units themselves, and this would come to the ARB later for approval. • Ms. Notkins asked if the pole lights concealed the lightbulb or if the lightbulb could be seen. o They were LED, and the LED array was up in the top portion of the light. It was open with no glass, but they would be full cut-off and no lighting would be directed upwards. • Ms. Notkins asked about the CR for the LED lamps. o He believed they were 80 CR. • Ms. Notkins said that 80 CR was a really blue light, and she requested it be improved with a different LED. The CR rating made a difference, and 80 was below what would generally be acceptable. The LED should be chosen by the CR rather than the Kelvin. o The applicant had already installed lights at 80 CR throughout Phase I. • Mr. Daniel agreed with the applicant and was concerned about mixing up the lighting between Phase I and Phase II. • Ms. Notkins thought it would be a good idea to take a look at a bit warmer of a light, particularly in the shopping area where people should be made more comfortable. o The shopping area was self-contained, as there was a wall around it. But the applicant would be willing to look into it. Ms. Aubry made the following motion: Mr. Chairman, I move that the ARB approve item ARB-18-LOR-02, tax map #107-1 ((9)) located in the Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area for the proposed Phase 2A site plans, public improvement plan and guard tower as submitted and presented at the March 8, 2018, ARB meeting, subject to the following condition: 1) The ARB recommends that the applicant consider lighting within the penitentiary walls at a CR of at least 85 if not 90. Staff will inform the ARB on this decision. ARB March 8, 2018 2 Upon review of the materials, the proposal is found to meet requirements of Zoning Ordinance 7-200 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICTS. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sutphin and approved on a vote of 6-1 (with Ms. Notkins opposed). 2. ARB-18-LOR-03: Proposal for Phase 2A penitentiary buildings, sallyport and guard’s quarters at the Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area, tax map # 107-1-((09)). The 2001 Lorton Correctional Complex MOA stipulates that the ARB review undertakings within the area eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and that the area within the Eligible District is subject to review as stipulated in Section 7-200 of the Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance. Section 7-200 of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that: 1) plans shall be referred to the ARB for its review and recommendation and 2) ARB approval shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. At its January 2017 meeting a workshop was held with the ARB on Phase 2A of the development for the initial adaptive re-use of the seven buildings within the penitentiary wall and drafts of the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Lighting Plan, and architectural sheets of the proposed façade changes. The applicant will submit materials to the Lorton Heritage Society and VDHR as required by the MOA. Mr. Jim Perry, Elm Street Development, Inc., and Mr. Dave Kaul, AIA, The Alexander Company, represent the proposal. Mount Vernon Supervisory District Presentation: • All of the slate roofs would remain, and there would be a restoration of the masonry work, a replacement of the battered wood, and a replacement of the mechanical system. There would be commercial entrances added to the cell blocks, and of the 27 elevations, changes would be made to only 3 elevations. The storefront showed what potential signage could look like along the metal canopy structure, which would be located on top of a steel frame. The signage was not a part of the request, but the ARB had wanted to see an idea of possibly what it would look like. There would be minor changes to the outside of the guard quarters with the addition of new doors to meet fire code requirements. Around 8-10 cell blocks would be cleaned up and remain as a historic piece. The historic fence would also remain, but the rusted metal and concrete would be removed as a part of the restoration. Discussion: • None Ms. Notkins made the following motion: Mr. Chairman, I move that the ARB approve item ARB-18-LOR-03, tax map #107-1 ((9)) located in the Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area for the proposed for Phase 2A penitentiary buildings, sallyport and guard’s quarters, as submitted and presented at the March 8, 2018, ARB meeting. Upon review of the materials, the proposal is found to meet requirements of Zoning Ordinance 7-200 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICTS. ARB March 8, 2018 3 The motion was seconded by Ms. Aubry and approved on a vote of 7-0. 3. ARB-18-LOR-04: Proposal for Penitentiary Wall and Towers and Repairs to Buttresses at the Laurel Hill Adaptive Reuse Area, tax map # 107-1-((09)). The 2001 Lorton Correctional Complex MOA stipulates that the ARB review undertakings within the area eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and that the area within the Eligible District is subject to review as stipulated in Section 7-200 of the Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance. Section 7-200 of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that: 1) plans shall be referred to the ARB for its review and recommendation and 2) ARB approval shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. At its September 2016 meeting the ARB reviewed the proposed buttresses reconstruction; the Alexander Company is now supervising the reconstruction efforts. The applicant will submit materials to the Lorton Heritage Society and VDHR as required by the MOA. Mr. Jim Perry, Elm Street Development, Inc., and Mr. Dave Kaul, AIA, The Alexander Company, represent the proposal. Mount Vernon Supervisory District Presentation made by John Pluta: • The applicant provided the repair details of the 8 buttresses that were removed by the county Facilities Management Division (FMD) due to deterioration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Archaeology of the Prussian Crusade
    Downloaded by [University of Wisconsin - Madison] at 05:00 18 January 2017 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PRUSSIAN CRUSADE The Archaeology of the Prussian Crusade explores the archaeology and material culture of the Crusade against the Prussian tribes in the thirteenth century, and the subsequent society created by the Teutonic Order that lasted into the six- teenth century. It provides the first synthesis of the material culture of a unique crusading society created in the south-eastern Baltic region over the course of the thirteenth century. It encompasses the full range of archaeological data, from standing buildings through to artefacts and ecofacts, integrated with writ- ten and artistic sources. The work is sub-divided into broadly chronological themes, beginning with a historical outline, exploring the settlements, castles, towns and landscapes of the Teutonic Order’s theocratic state and concluding with the role of the reconstructed and ruined monuments of medieval Prussia in the modern world in the context of modern Polish culture. This is the first work on the archaeology of medieval Prussia in any lan- guage, and is intended as a comprehensive introduction to a period and area of growing interest. This book represents an important contribution to promot- ing international awareness of the cultural heritage of the Baltic region, which has been rapidly increasing over the last few decades. Aleksander Pluskowski is a lecturer in Medieval Archaeology at the University of Reading. Downloaded by [University of Wisconsin - Madison] at 05:00
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Terminologies
    FISH TERMINOLOGIES Monument Type Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: Classification of monument type records by function.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Mississippi EIS Statement of Values
    State of Mississippi EIS Statement of Values State ISO # of Square Flood Location Name Address City County Code Zip Const Construction Description Stories Date Building Personal Property Total TIV Occupancy Footage Zone Department Name Contact Contact Email Contact Phone $4,602,232,796 $1,021,520,873 $5,623,753,669 Oakley Youth Development Center Multi-Purpose Building 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 2 Masonry Bearing Wall 1 1969 $4,413,967 $810,000 $5,223,967 Gym / Recreation 27,117 X Oakley Youth Development Center Dennis Daniels [email protected] (601) 857-7597 Exey Edwards Clinic 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 2 Masonry Bearing Wall 1 1944 $218,889 $86,600 $305,489 Clinic / Hospital 1,970 X Oakley Youth Development Center Dennis Daniels [email protected] (601) 857-7597 Laundry 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 2 Masonry Bearing Wall 1 1961 $718,983 $28,800 $747,783 Multipurpose 2,609 X Oakley Youth Development Center Dennis Daniels [email protected] (601) 857-7597 Bldg. Trades Bldg. 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 Tin / Metal 1 1971 $1,615,000 $651,088 $2,266,088 Vocational / Technical 17,933 X Oakley Youth Development Center Dennis Daniels [email protected] (601) 857-7597 Bldg. Trades Bldg. 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 Tin / Metal 1 1967 $1,120,000 $1,953,994 $3,073,994 Vocational / Technical 14,024 X Oakley Youth Development Center Dennis Daniels [email protected] (601) 857-7597 Foster Cottage 2375 Oakley Road Raymond Hinds MS 39154 2 Masonry
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Ossining Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
    Village of Ossining Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Adopted: Village of Ossining Board of Trustees, July 2, 1991 Approved: NYS Secretary of State Gail S. Shaffer, July 11, 1991 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, June 8, 1993 Adopted Amendment: Village of Ossining Board of Trustees, March 16, 2011 Approved: NYS Secretary of State César A. Perales, October 25, 2011 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, February 1, 2012 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) has been prepared and approved in accordance with provisions of the Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing Regulations (19 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation of this Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State Coastal Management Program as a routine program change has been obtained in accordance with provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (p.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. [Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068.] The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department of State, Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Suite 1010, Albany, New York 12231-0001.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge of Civilizations the Near East and Europe C
    Bridge of Civilizations The Near East and Europe c. 1100–1300 edited by Peter Edbury, Denys Pringle and Balázs Major Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-327-0 ISBN 978-1-78969-328-7 (e-Pdf) © the individual authors and Archaeopress 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Printed Word Publishing This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents Notes on Contributors �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ix Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������xiii Castles and Warfare 1� Constructing a Medieval Fortification in Syria: Margat between 1187 and 1285 ���������������1 Balázs Major 2� Applying the Most Recent Technologies in Archaeological and Architectural Documentation at Margat ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 23 Bendegúz Takáts 3� Al-Marqab Citadel (Margat): Present Possibilities and Future Prospects ������������������������� 35 Marwan Hassan 4� New Research on the Medieval Water-Management System of Crac des Chevaliers �������� 54 Zsolt Vágner and Zsófia E. Csóka 5� The
    [Show full text]
  • Footprints of the Douglas Scotti
    Footprints of the Douglas Scotti A Scottish Warrior Journeys to Piacenza in Northern Italy in 794 By Dr. Deborah Richmond Foulkes, FSAScot The ancient walled medieval village and Douglas stronghold of Vigoleno Footprints of the Douglas Scotti A Scottish Warrior Journeys to Piacenza in Northern Italy in 794 By Dr. Deborah Richmond Foulkes, FSAScot In September 2005 I set out with a fellow Douglas historian, Lt. Col. Gavin. T. A. Douglas, DFC, FSAScot and his bride of ten months Anne Douglas in search of the history of our Douglas ancestor who departed Scotland in 794 in search of adventure. We carried in hand Scottish chronicles noting the accomplishments of one Sholto Duglas who in 770 came to the aid of Solvathius, King of Scots; defeating the king’s enemies, his bravery and skills Dr. Deborah Richmond Foulkes as the staunch warrior-tactician were rewarded with a large grant of land in Lanarkshire. As our small group embarked from our starting point in Milano, Italy we reviewed the briefings for the journey; noting the Italian records that referred to one Guillelmo de Duglas, a younger son of Sholto who arrived in Piacenza Italy at the end of the 8th century; a lieutenant in service to Carlo Magno, Emperor Charlemagne. We had plans to visit some of the strongholds of the descendants of that first ‘William’ Douglas Scotti. What we found were castelli and roccas and medieval villages that protected the ancient Ducato of Piacenza nestled in the shadows of the Italian Alps; a string of fortresses residing on original defensive positions, several established by the ancient Romans, others by one Scottish warrior from the 9th century and his heirs; sites evolving into medieval castles, some held today by the proud descendants of Guillelmo de Duglas.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Competition Subject Matter.Pdf
    THE INTERNATIONAL TWO-STAGE COMPETITION for the study design and the realization design of urban and architectural development of Philadelphia Boulevard (Bulwar Filadelfijski) in Toruń, Poland. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE COMPETITION (Appendix 12 of the Competition Rules) Date of completion:November 2014 r. Contents Table of contents 1. Location of the competition area ....................................................... 5 1.1. Central part ............................................................................ 5 1.2. Western part ........................................................................... 6 1.3. Eastern part ............................................................................ 6 2. Boundaries of the competition area and its division ................................. 7 2.1. Realization zone ...................................................................... 7 2.2. Study zone ............................................................................. 8 3. Basic conditions and preliminary conclusions ......................................... 9 3.1. Directions of spatial development policy ......................................... 9 3.2. Guidelines of landscaping ......................................................... 10 4. Justification for the need to introduce changes ..................................... 11 4.1. Investment project .................................................................. 12 4.2. Social expectations .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Histoire De L'alsace
    Printing / Binding Instructions 1. Print document double sided on letter size paper Histoire de l’Alsace 2. Cut the entire printed document in half 3. Fold over making sure the page numbering is continuous Tome II: Bas-Rhin 4. For the cover: Print just the first page on card stock paper Cut the cover in half as well 5. Assemble the covers on the document 6. Punch the left side for a binding, spiral or comb as desired http://www.lessmiths.com/~kjsmith/html/main.shtml Kevin Smith 2015 KJ Smith i ii iii iv INTRODUCTION This little guide stems from my interest in “putting it all together”, for understanding something of the history of Alsace (whence comes my lovely bride). I am partictularily interested in that history which has left tangible evidence in the form of many castles dotting the Vosges foothills and the Ma Serie Histoire de l’Alsace fortified towns which often opposed them on the fertile plains below. Not only the towns and castles themselves but the ghosts of those who lived Tome I: Haut-Rhin there, their concerns, motavations, and the broader European social currents Tome II: Bas-Rhin that influenced and often inundated them. Tome III: Histoire Naturelle I have started with a backbone of articles describing the many castles which remain ever present. These are the transition civilation existing between an early Celtic and Roman world swamped by the growth of Frankish power, and by a later Europe shaped by new cities and ideas yet retaining the legacy of feudal/aristocratic ambitions and foibles.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlefields, Archaeology & History
    THE BATTLEFIELDs, ArCHAEoLoGY & HIsTorY 2020 Tours INCLuDING LATE 2019 & EArLY 2021 Welcome At The Cultural Experience, our dedicated team of experts have been working hard to create a programme of exciting tours for 2020, which we are sure will pique your interest. As well as bringing back some old favourites such as Wellington in India and the Battle of the Bulge, we are delighted to announce a whole host of new tours such as The Cold War, The Silk Roads in China and The Battle of Britain. We hope you enjoy reading our brochure, and travelling through history as you do. Further information regarding our tours can be seen at our award winning website www.theculturalexperience.com or you can call us on 0345 475 1815. We look forward to speaking to you soon. What to Expect Why Us? Guides Guests The Cultural Experience has been Your Guides are all experts in their Your fellow Guests will typically be providing expert led historical and own field – chosen on the basis of a refreshing and diverse group of cultural tours for over 10 years, their ability to bring history to life in individuals and couples from a wide with our programme expanding an interesting, enthusiastic and, where range of backgrounds and professions. every year. We have received the appropriate, humorous way. They No special prior knowledge is gold trusted service award from will act as your host throughout the assumed or required – just a general independent review site, Feefo, two holiday and be available to answer interest in the subject. Whilst years in a row and 95.5% of our your questions whilst conducting tours respecting individual privacy, we work customers say they would travel with during the day or when socialising in hard to make everyone feel welcome us again.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHNSON, Donald Leslie COLLECTION Architecture Museum, University of South Australia
    JOHNSON, Donald Leslie COLLECTION Architecture Museum, University of South Australia JOHNSON, Donald Leslie SERIES 107, 109, 133, 140, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 199, 205, 206, 211, 212, 222, 223, 264, 369, 370, 384, 385, 391, 392, 393, 396, 397, 403, 404, 429, 437, 438 Donald Leslie Johnson (2/1/1930/–), architect, academic and architectural historian, was born in Bremerton, Washington State in the United States and graduated with a Bachelor of Architecture from the University of Washington in 1957. He then undertook a master’s degree at the University of Pennsylvania, studying under Louis I. Kahn, graduating in 1961. In 1957 Johnson joined Johnson-Austin Architects, Tacoma, Washington as a draftsman, moving to C.V. Rueger and Associates, Architects in 1958. From 1958 to 1960 he worked at the architectural firm of Harbeson, Hough, Livingston and Larson in Philadelphia before returning to Washington to work at Grant, Copeland and Chervenak, Architects in Seattle from 1960 to 1961. From 1962 to 1965 he was employed by a number of firms in Tucson, Arizona and then joined Cain, Nelson and Wares, Architects, Tucson as a design associate. In 1957 and 1961 he worked as a designer/draftsman at Bassetti and Morse, Architects, Seattle, Washington. During these years he also taught design, architectural design, theory and architectural history at the University of Arizona, the University of Adelaide, South Australia, and Washington State University. In 1972 he accepted a position at Flinders University where he taught architectural history until he retired in 1988. Johnson has published widely in books, book chapters, articles in academic and professional journals, conference papers, encyclopaedia entries and reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven Armory NR
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: _____New Haven Armory_______________________ Other names/site number: _____Goffe Street Armory_________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: __N/A_________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: ___270-290 Goffe Street_________________________ City or town: __New Haven_ State: ___CT____ County: ___New Haven Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Ang Range, Kansas
    A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE , KANSAS Open-file Report No. 137 September 15, 2007 Kansas Biological Survey 2101 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE, KANSAS PREPARED FOR AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 3500 FETCHET AVENUE ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-5157 AND SMOKY HILL AIR NATIONAL GUARD RANGE 8429 WEST FARRELLY ROAD SALINA, KS 67401-9407 SEPTEMBER 15, 2007 Citation: Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Assume corporate authorship for chapters and appendices except where stated otherwise. Chapters and appendices with individual authors may be cited as in the following example: Kindscher, K., and H. Loring. 2007. Plant communities and landscape features. Pp. 11—34. In Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Cover Photo: Smoky Hill ANG Range Landscape. Hillary Loring. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………… i List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………. iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….. vi Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………. viii Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………… ix Chapter 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1. Project Background …………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2. Study Objectives…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.3. Study Area…………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.4. Overview of Ecological History, Current Conditions, and Land Management Recommendations ………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]