Toxicity of Formaldehyde in Experimental Animals -Concentrations of the Chemical in the Elution from Dishes of Formaldehyde Resin in Some Vegetables
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Keio J. Med. 24: 19-37, 1975 TOXICITY OF FORMALDEHYDE IN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS -CONCENTRATIONS OF THE CHEMICAL IN THE ELUTION FROM DISHES OF FORMALDEHYDE RESIN IN SOME VEGETABLES KENZABURO TSUCHIYA, YOSHIO HAYASHI, MITSUKO ONODERA and TAKAO HASEGAWA Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University (Received for publication Oct. 16, 1974) ABSTRACT The study composes of the following experiments: 1) The first experiment was carried out in order to calculate the lethal dose (LD50) of formaldehyde and of formalin solution. 2) The second one was to examine the quantitative method and to measure the concentration of formaldehyde in solution eluted from plastic bowls made of formaldehyde resin. 3) In the final experiment formaldehyde in some foods was measured. Princinal results obtained were as follows: 1) LD50 of formaldehyde by oral administration was determined to be 500-800 my/ke for rats. 2) The maximum allowable concentration of the chemical for chronic poison ing was estimated to exist at the level of around 25 to 30 mg/day/50 kg for man. 3) However, it was conceivable that various kinds of food would contain formaldehyde as high as almost 20 ppm. More elaborate studies are required on this point. 4) It was confirmed that formaldehyde is eluted from plastic dishes and bowls made from a monomer of formaldehyde from the non-detectable con centration at 40•Ž up to 20 ppm at 90•Ž, and up to almost 400 ppm in solu tion of 4% acetic acid of 90•Ž, showing only 10 ppm at 40•‹ to 50•Ž, after leaving the solutions in the bowls for 15 minutes. Formaldehyde is used for various purposes in industry, and the manufactur ing industry of synthetic resin, deodorizer, sterilizing agent, antiseptics, dye, leather, rubber and synthetic fiber and the industry of water proofing and re 19 20 Kenzaburo Tsuchiya et al ducer are attended with the dangers of exposure to formaldehyde. The toxic action of formaldehyde was studied by Flury et al,1,2 using cats. The animals died chiefly of edema, hemorrhage and inflammation of the mucous membrane of the respiratory organs, and in cases where death did not occur, the symptoms being limited to irritation of the mucous membrane, they recovered without sequelae. The maximum allowable concentration in the atmosphere of the working environment ranges from 10 to 5 ppm1,3 but it seems unlikely up until the present that formaldehyde has posed a great problem in industrial medicine in Japan. However, since no research under actual conditions has been conducted, the real situation is uncertain. In accordance with the recent production of various kinds of plastic table ware made from synthetic resins, it was found that formaldehyde was eluted from the tableware made of formaldehyde resin, presenting a problem in food sanitation. Noted in particular was a study4 in which the toxic action of formal dehyde was found by chronic experiments with rabbits, though the number of cases was small. It was though that this problem required full examination from a public health point of view. The chronic toxic action of a substance is a very difficult problem, and in consideration of the period, concentrations, species of animals and method of medical observation, it is thought to be almost impossible to discover the limits sufficient to induce chronic toxic action experimentally. Therefore, the maximum limit possible to perform actually would be to administer the water which was actually used for the dish or bowl made of synthetic resin to animals of 2-3 species for 1-2 years for physiological, biochemical and pathological examina tions. However, since even such an experimental study requires great expense, effort and a certain period of time, the authors decided to first calculate the lethal dose as a preliminary study for an estimation of the rough dose for chronic intoxication in humans in order to contribute it as basic material for future experiments on chronic intoxication. In addition, the amount of formaldehyde in various foods which we eat daily was measured for comparison with the amount of eluted formaldehyde from the tableware made from synthetic resin commercially available. The problem of formaldehyde in the tableware made of synthetic resin seems to have been brought forward in the United States as well, and the dispute as a political problem between the Association for Ceramics and the Association for Resin is noted in the November 1951 issue of the Journal of Modern Plastics. Although we encountered the "Formaldehyde-Its Toxicity and Potential Dangers" in Supplement No. 181 of the Public Health Report for 1945 as litera Toxicity of Formaldehyde 21 ture, unfortunately, we were not able to obtain in journal concerned nor reprints in spite of all our efforts. Accordingly, it is not possible to introduce literature on chronic disturbances by the oral administration of formalin, but the present study is though to be contributory in the sense mentioned above. With this study as a basis, studies on chronic intoxication should be further developed in the future. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 1) Calculation of the lethal dose. About 400 male rats were used for the experiments. Their body weight ranged from 100 g to 200 g, and animals of the same body weight and age were used in an experiment as long as possible. The rats were of the Wister strain, but because of the large number required they were purchased from animal dealers whose reliability was not necessarily high. The number of rats purchased each time was about 50, and those not showing a certain increase in the body weight or those with a poor increase rate were not included. The animals were raised in metal cages in groups of 5 each, fed on solid feed and placed in an animal room which maintained a temperature of 18•‹ to 20•Ž. Formaldehyde was administered in single doses through sonde, and included in the calculation were rats which died after one week of the administration. As will be stated later, most animals died within 24 hours of the administration, a few dying on the 3rd day. Those which survived lived until the experiments were finished. The LD5O was calculated from the formaldehyde solution prepared from the special-grade paraformaldehyde and the commercial special-grade formalin (in cludes methyl alcohol of more than 10%) according to body weight (age) and concentration (2% and 4%). The routinely adopted Litchfield's method was used for the calculation. 2) Measurement of formaldehyde in the eluate of plastic bowl of formaldehyde resin. As will be mentioned later, the method by Schiff's reagent with fuchsine or rosaniline added was examined in various ways, and the calibration curve was prepared every time. Combined was the method•‹ by chromotropic acid which is said to react specifically with formaldehyde. Using the dilute solution of formal dehyde of a known amount measured by iodimetry, recovery test was performed to confirm the advantages, disadvantages and confidence limits of the above-men tioned three methods (the details of this methodology will not be included here). Observed also was the relationship between the degree of coloration of the Rimini 22 Kenzaburo Tsuchiya et al reaction, qualitative reaction, and the value of quantitative analysis. The method for eluting plastic bowl will be found in the data to follow and will not be included here. 3) Measurement of formaldehyde in foods. Formaldehyde in foods was measured according to the literature mentioned below.7 However, some part still requires examination, and therefore, only a part of it will be reported as the results of a preliminary experiment. It was found necessary to examine the analytical method in the future so that formaldehyde should be measured for various kinds of food.8 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 1) Lethal dose. As mentioned previously, male rats were used for the measurement of the lethal dose. Table 1 and Fig. 1 shows the relationship between the dose admin istered orally of 2% of the commercial special-grade formalin and the mortality rate. The body weight was 184 g in average, and the variation was large (standard deviation= 31.7 g). Table 2 and Fig. 2 demonstrates the results of the administration of 2% solution of formaldehyde not containing methyl alcohol. The rats in this case weighed less than those in Table 1, being 103.4 g •} 13.5 g, Fig. 1 LD50 for 2% solution of for Fig. 2 LD50 for 2% solution of for malin. maldehyde. LD50 and 95% confidence lim LD50 and 95% confidence lim its: 460 (330-650) mgm/kgm its: 550 (423-715) mgm/kgm S and 95% confidence limits: S and 95% confidence limits: 1.52 (1.04-2.42) 1.6 (1.12-2.29) Toxicity of Formaldehyde 23 Table 1 Oral administration of 2% formalin solution LD50 460(330-650)mgm/kgm Mean of total body weight: 180.9g•}31.7 Table 2 Oral administration of 2% formaldehyde solution LD50 550(420-715)mgm/kgm Mean of total body weight: 103.4g•}13.5 q/, , Fig. 3 LD50 for 4% solution of for Fig. 4 LD50 for 4% solution of for maldehyde. maldehyde. Lll50 and 95% confidence lim LD50 and 19/20 confidence lim its: 590 (770-460) mgm/kgm its: 675 (803-560) mgm/kgm S and 95% confidence limits: S and 19/20 confidence limits: 1.65 (2.56-1.06) 1.36 (1.57-1.17) 24 Kenzaburo Tsuchiya et al Table 3 Oral administration of 4% formaldehyde solution LD50 590(460-770)mgm/kgm Mean of total body weight: 112.1g•}15 Table 4 Oral administration of 4% formaldehyde solution LD50 675(567-803)mam/kgm Mean of total body weight: 105.1g•}10 Fig.