A Review on the Risk Management Terminology for the Use in Standards)

KR0101261

KAERI/TR-1782/2001

1 f

(A Review on the Risk Management Terminology for the Use in Standards)

2001. 3 2001 \i 31

(MMIS

(MMIS O Oj:

ISO fl-^ draft*

^^^ KS X 0000 : 2001(ISO TBD : 1999) 'e| -§-<>| - ff-^^l •A>-§-*>7] ^t!: ^1^ (Risk management terminology - Guidelines for use in standards)' £.3.

- 1 - Summary

This technical report describes a result of reviews on the risk management terminology for the use in standards. Experiences in related technical fields and their definitions are reviewed according to the concepts and operational definitions of risk terminologies. It results into a draft standard for KS in the fields of product safety. Quality Assurance, Industrial and Occupational Safety, Financial Management and Risk Management, and others may show many different definitions for their own technical purpose. A draft KS standard for risk terminology must be revised and enhanced to be adopted to the product safety. However, this review does not provide a strict guide for use in the operational definitions of risk terms, but does provide a common base among application areas. The result of this review is submitted to Korea Standard Association in form of a draft KS standards, KS X 0000 : 2001 (ISO TBD : 1999), titled as " Risk management terminology - Guidelines for

use in standards " . mm

Summary

Ml MB 4 1. 4

2. 5

3. 5

^| 2 6

1. 6 2. o 8 3. v 15

^ 44

A. £|^ B. E^

C. KS

_ "3 _ 1 3 M

'CE PL safety)'ofl

(risk management)^

KS f^A

™>

(opportunity)^

- 4 - ^S] (definition)* KS

2000. 8. 1 ~ 2001. 3. 31 (8 711-1)

MMIS ^ ^W^ °1 •%• MMIS ^ ^^J

- 5 - , ISO, EEC, AS, BS

HI j7 Ol^

e) 71^^ a^srt- ^1*3*H

# isos] -g-o] ^^i-

ISO ISO/TMB WG on Risk Management Terminology °11^i 7]]1^:-fL°l Risk Management Terminology - Guideline for use in standards-!- nfs.JL <8,t\-. x%e\-X\, 5)iH

-§-•§-

- 6 - KS fl-^^.

_L- —| £ ^ *i asm 043-261-2462 o| # ©h 031-220-2157 s| 5 ^ Tj^-CH^JQI ^S^^^h 02-450-3530 0| •§. S| oj ^ U 042-868-2941 i S °! =^ -^-C[] "Sj- 777 cH Sj"-?j °h^"i "i"1 "^hjlt- oj ^ S 043-261-2457 & § i! ^•^- C|j ^t" Tjl CH ^h-^l °h^i •^2-<3l-Jl[. 043-261-2457 "a fl ^* 043-261-2457

- 7 - 2.

ISO7> 7fl^-^

(l) e|^

SLg. <£*V ^^(loss) ^ H ^<^ 7>^^oil cfl^- ^-l-(probability)^- (combination)f!- ^JAS ^"^^ ^]^a] SiPl7l- o}u|cf. ^.

°1 ^l-1^^- ^-^-S. ^^-sf^cf. o]^ hazard, harm, injury, danger, safety ^ E]i

-^, ^7>, ^^, tfl-g- ^ el^ ai^H (4.7)

4[« (4.1)

ARj (4.3)

SZF (4.2)

(2) e)^

managment) <*|)

nfl-f

(hazard)* ^^(estimation)

(analysis) )- ^ cf.

- 9 - (5.7) t SAH (5.6)

-2-.fcd —i u AL A]

3i|-g(lS0 60300-3-9)

- 10 - significance)^-

^ ^7|-(risk assessment)e)- risk assessment^- 5}

£- el^H. tfl-§-(treatment)

^-(acceptance) ^^r cfl -§-(treatment)

*=• AJ * alia ii. —i 111!

*•

•SAI

- 11 - ^3 ifl-g-(treatment)-i-

al^H. ^a| (4.19) al^a. -g-^j % m?\ (4.10)

E.|^3L §*1 (4.9) ea ^S (4.17)

Z\±L3. ^9(4.15) E|>ia m?\ (4.16)

a|^3 CH#(4.26) a|â s|s| (4.11) B\±3. 3\zm (4.23) E|â ^g- (4.22) a|â g ^ (4.5) a|râ *\7\ (4.25) a|â fi^ (4.24)

E.\±EL ^§ (4.8)

a|r^H SMJUsI- (4.12)

Sit)-.

12 - (3) el^

5}>;3. ^rS]l- -g 38 all?] 5]^3L ^e| A] ^ (risk management system)

^7^1 ^(stakeholder) -c- °lsfl ^Tfl ^[(interested parties)^ 7]E|- e)i

(4)

ISO^flA^ 7]]1|H|1°1 Risk management terminology

- 13 - Guidelines for use in standards •§-

^r 4

- 14 - 3.

AH g _l_ —| ^ st ^ ol gj 7P 043-261-2462 oi # n 031-220-2157 Id 1- .in. Al- 02-450-3530 o| S si •a ^ s 042-868-2941 31 ^ S! ^ =?• s 043-261-2457 & « S ^t _fcji rll -g|- yp Ml jjfL.oj QLXH T1 "oKJTL 043-261-2457 £J id ¥ ^ b=J HI -g|- TTJ rll -5-j- oj o 1-XH .**^. "o}• Tl_[. 043-261-2457

(operational definition)

- 15 - probability ISO event)o| y

ISO 3534-1 A^ (random event)o]|

AS/NZS A|- 4390 : 1999

SJ£S| X[o\ : ^#s j(long-term) ei£(relative frequency) o| l S£(degree of AS/NZS 3534-1,1.1 ij-^ 4390 : ^ uj i(frequency) 1999

eji£(frequency) : *>]?} -leh ^

feAH (likelihood): *r»

#7|-fe(unlikely)/M#(moderate)/7^(likely)/>1 s| S)-^ (almost certain)", "S# ^ §l-&(incredible)/2i#^ S^-Bdrnprobable)/ >l 2-1 y \ el (remote)/^^(occasional)/^[^(probable)/&J ej (freque nt)"ah ^€- E^?l- Si^-cfl, ^#aj A^S| S^(ranks) o| L-F ^-^ (classes)oll *l|B|^fe

(ISO & AI-AI-, event)o|

- 16 - ^3 #oi(eh)

consequence

ISO ^ Mil (*•& Ai-y-, event)2| AJ-S(outcome)

- AS/NZS - ARj°| g^^AH ^^g £*Hloss), ^sB (injury), ^sH 4390 : (disadvantage), s^ o|°!(gain)# ^lalfi^. a^l-^ g^ 1999

- a^ -ISO - AlTjAH 3534-1

- °[ AÔ^Ê^ Sm ss n 0|Aj-o| ^j^7[ Ê^y. ^ o.

as sia

- 32f2| S|D|S|- 22^# X|t|*^ 3^011^ 'AJZ|AH'O| E(.^#.

(ISO A^Tjo) AJ.g(outcome) 9 2|)

- 17 - event

ISO set of circumstances)s|

ISO 3534-1

- £13 SS SO] : A|-2j AS/NZS 011 AH A^(incident) O|L[ 4390 : 1999

(ISO set of circumstances)£| ^-a.

- 18 - interested party

ISO/DIS - CHS! 2^js| ^gcni cflsH g^S o|§|j3.l-7i|-i- 7|-3 gel- 4s 9000: ISO ^ 2000

ISO 14000

1. iMI^Kstakeholder) as sia 2. *)l3XKthird party) - S.\±3L B&n^ o|§H &nxKinterested pany)o\^\°l, O.B]L.\- £M|X^ oisy a-Tiixi-Mci- ci sf^si S|D|O|DK

oj^! 3£^js| -^goii c|j5j| g^sj o|sHS7)l# 7[g gg *€• (ISO

- 19 - mitigation

ISO fl^ s§t[ A|-7JO| «.S2H gn|.^. xii3i-§[.^ 14 ^i^o|i-i- znmm

as sia

18 8 Ah^oj «.g^ ^^S 3&3}?(i4 ?||om ^J|§M (ISO S»1 AH 7^711 ^.

20 - ^3 S

Sol §cH residual risk

ISO flzj

as sja 1. Sl-a^S -S-Soilfe ISO/IEC Guide 51 £h^.

(ISO §£|)

- 21 - ^3 #ol(°!-) E|-El

risk

ISO fl^S a^i 5f.

- AS/NZS 4390 : - JE2. XE Q]| O^ srt-S. ^. ^x o| Jbu 1999 - AS/NZS - HB141 E|- got §°| aS0|| ^ifS S ^ 2i^ ni ° i ^-ASft- 71si, a^i-21- a-a :1999 -

1. cHS Spoilt a|^a.5j- n[-°| g ^(deviation)* ^-gh

9 >)•& ISO/IEC 51 #S 3.

4. *^ ^|SH7F 2iS 4= ^- ^ll ^,£. £!-S^ d-SS c.\ ^ELS.\ §°|fe ISO/IEC 51 ij-

(ISO SS|)

22 - risk acceptance iso |^ SS(decision to acccept).

AS/NZS Sfi 4390:1999 oil s>\7-\-5[oi a o|o)| AS/NZS HB141 :1999

1 "uj-of-&o|cKaacept)"o|g- ^--g 4= S(acceptance)oI

S o|D| 2. a|r^ 3.

(ISO S(decision to accept).

- 23 - risk analysis

ISO W^ #-§-(systematic use).

_ s§ A|-2dO| ^D[L[ X|-^- ^ Of L-hn^ 3 H^l-Sl -g-SS.71- 'H -AS/NZS 4360:1999

— 7 !••§•?[!• SS'E S-||7||5j2.S A|--§-o|-0^ -^--S A(-^d 0| "^J 0[-1 [- X|- -AS/NZA •?• ^''cS Sl-jH 3. -^Jll-Sl 3.7|7|- ^y a |-1 |- E|-tr-7(--g- 2 § ^J|"zEr HB141

••1999

— 3 :T='§'(4.8)—1 7|^j 2. Sfiollt s^ tysx.(\istorical data), o|-g-5j ^M, SSL-^-F-E! 3 §H (informed opinions), a^ll^K4.28)s| a-^AKconcerns)»

3. SI'S aS H-1^3 TZ:± s| gsi-^- ISO/IEC Guide 51 U^

H|^5L# ^7\O[JL ?g§ T*g°h^- Sa(information)sJ (ISO iJ?||S|o} #§(systematic use).

- 24 - 1 SOKSH

risk assessment

ISO fl^ ^H •«* E,^H ,

-AS/NZS 4360:1999 3. -g-^ (risk analysis)^ E-Ir^a. S7Krisk evaluation)s| - **; -AS/NZA HB141 :1999

s.i-2-i asi-soii^i ai^=l S-^KRisk Analysis)^ ilj-ol-

(ISO Bl-a ^^ BJ^3 =j7h°j aei-£|°! 2fs.

- 25 - E|^a s(5|

goi #oi risk avoidance

ISO ^2J e.§3} ai.A-n A^I-OII 7H°j«|-x| g,^ a§(decision) *€• US 4F«!-SS^E| gsmfe «!§(action). -AS/NZS 4360:1999

- gaoii gjztshoi ai>:H -y-a-oii ^oi£|x| SJ-S 5f as -AS/N2A HB141 :1999

1. El^a. S|s|s| 3§a a|^3 S^KRisk Evaluation)^ gzw\

2. ^§S A^OII qsi-o^ ^cng SMoll ^7i«hoi E|^H# S as 2]a tw?i*i st£^- «ht as *e H-I^H ^--a ^&°S^EJ

E. &cK

sgih H|^3 4!-»ol| 7HSJ°I-*I &^ as (decision) *^ (ISO zisi ^-#O^^E| #BiL4^ g#(action). Sal)

- 26 - risk communication

ISO =fm s-\M as^at- ^.Mlxi- #2| EI^HOII && §MS| g^(sharing) SH| ^••E- J2l!-(exchange).

-AS/NZA - 2^|x|-2|- 0|«HiJ-^X|-0)|7)| B.\±3.0\\ Si| §fif gSsf2 EF go* §s| HB141 :1999

1. al^a ga.ia#oi|Ai H#E|-^ gat§ a|^a.(4.7)a| 5^H(existence), ^-^(nature), SEH(form), Srit(probability), 7A E(severity), ^r-S-^(acceptability), ^#(treatment), y\^[ ^#

°JA|- agx|^2f S7)|XF ^H| E)^3.0j| ?f& SfiLS] (ISO ijTf(sharing) :^TI: ia#(exchange). SS|)

- 27 - a|^3 x«oi

Sol #o| risk control

ISO ^3 a|^H a-ai g§f§ ^|i§|-^ ##.

-AS/NZS _ Jfigqoi a|^as ^|74©WUF s|4:s|-§p| ^H ga), fl-^, 4360:1999 g*K #£l^ asi-i- StSsfe a|^H -a-B-ls] a- ^g. -AS/NZA - -^ssj EI^^S m^^Lf &\±nny\ ?-i5H sai, ss, HB141 :1999

1. alâ fl|(H(4.13)fe &M(monitoring), nmit, 3So|| di& # ^(compliance) #•§• StJ-fl- ^ 2in:K as sia 2. aiâ. xi|oi°| §-B o|D| CHAI a|â. Ê| sei« a|n|s|-^- ^-S- o|D|o| Qhajs A|-S£J-^ 3^-Oll-fe. £|^H Ê| s-a mx)|

(ISO SS|)

- 28 - Sen goj risk criteria

ISO ^ £\±3.9.\ ^°|^(significance)* S7h«p| ^lih ?|5 S-^#. S2J

EF ^ot g°j

1. £|^3 7|^o||^ -Ef^ B|S §=' 0|°J, S^j A||Hg5j o^; A^ sl-a^il §=' aasj ^ as sja (priority), B.\±3. g7\ % ^^1 (assessment)oil t|S c[^ °j^#

(ISO E|^a.2| #2|^(Sjgnificance)# B7F^7) #^ ?l^ t.^#. SSI)

- 29 - \

risk estimation ISO T

,.«

IJ28JSI ÂK 7| BF a|- 3 a7|(4.16)o|| ISS uj^ #»^|Sl-Oi n|S ^ SJCK 2. Hjâsj Suhai- ^#0)1 cHth fh95t* 0|§€r^ 31|g ££ # a|â.&l| c(|3i- A|-5! °\ as sjg ^# ^^ ^S ^^ »## ^t E| a S E| H 2| J 3. - * ^ - ^ °^2S ^^ 7J01 E^°h j # 4. ^^r " ^^ *

(ISO SSI HI-H4 4UM4 9

- 30 - ^3 #oi(°f) E|>;a g7F

risk evaluation

ISO i?3 a|^as| ^-£|£!(significance^ 33^1 ^l^l-o^ ¥cHS E|^H 7|5(4.14)o|| q^oi ^ga a|^H(4.7)# ullsfe ^S.

-AS/NZS ^2f b|jil§|-0i 4sg CH-M-SI Bl^SL tfi u|HS(-Jl B.\± 4360:1999

1. E|â @7|-fe E|âis| ^(acceptance) *•& tj|# (treatment)sl SSÎI n 3nF# fii^s A^fi- ^ °>cK 2. £[S ^^s| a|^5L S7fe ISO/IEC Guide 51 iJ-S. as sja 3. £|â @7|-fe £|rias| #s-^# !§5|-b ?l$s| ai^s 7|So)| yâj *gg £|i:H# u|insfe 2f§°s =f=S -ir-g qi-g ^S CHIAH o|#£lc:K

ajâej ^S\M(significance)* SS^FÎ ^ô< ô|g (ISO a|^:3 7|^(4.14)o)| cHôj ^§g E|^3(4.7)# u|5ls|-^ Ss|)

- 31 - *^ *o,(a)

S&I §cH risk identification

ISO fl^J ^(4.7)3* a^(42)«« S.gj-si-0^ a|ii:3.s| S4:(elennents)#-8-

-AS/NZS 4360:1999

^(4 3) ^» ^K4 2) ^•^"•^•(4 1) "^" •§• ? ^"jg1

•(4 28) "1 -^•l"'Ak' A 1*011 jif-H^ sj ^ S.-^- "ci ^*l"

(ISO

- 32 - ^^

So, so, source identification ISO fl^ •Bg(source)* S"ol a7Wa wwt«.

-AS/NZS 4360:1999 Ef ^O|: SSJ

ISO/IEC ^£|^- Hazard ah *!Sf£S, i Guide 51 ?! (hazard identification)o|a[-jl

(ISO SS (source)* SJ'JI

- 33 - a|^:3. ^a|

risk management

ISO ^3

- a^sf 7|S| o|°|^ ^^(adverse effect)* S^SS &EL| -AS/NZS °F^I ^Iffl- -S-SKculture), ^FS(process), ^3E(structure) 4360:1999

1. e.1^3. sFalfe °d^°s B-\±B. S7|- si -§-^(4.10), a|^3 £H#(4.26), EI^H 4=§(4.8), E|^a s|A|-rt#(4.12) -§•# SfS

2. E|â. £!-a|t î|#O|l-|. AHH|^ ^D|2p7|o| 7| c^|0l|Ai ^S. as sia 3. alâoii cHS- «HS ^9, ^S, &^, S?K CH#, a^l, Sfi Hffl-, §s| a|â. â| OJJ=# ^mt[7\ ^|§n â| g*!), 51 g sj g*!|, a*K 5J-IS, #« *l|7i|5jos. sigo^ fl# s|n|s(.^ a|^3. â| Ji|-S(risk management process)# Ss|-7|s. i}c[.

a|^H.o|| &•&[(% o\& s^j# x|A|sm #x||sh^ a ssfS (ISO SJ--E.JS. S2|)

- 34 - risk management system

ISO flzj ^§ a|^a(4.7)# ^a|3feD|| SSS

51^! — | -^S-l A| -*>• ^j g-

1. -3"^-l ^l — ^-!i — | S.^:0]| -c

(yl nj ^^xi oi JI\.gi ^i ^» a (ISO

- 35 - ** *

Xrl Ol n|\ o —1 ^= N. 01 »H risk perception

ISO ^3 5!-7||x|-(4.28)s| S-^J (concern) ^-S &[TI 71-*| (values).

H -^S(needs), ei2l(issue) 5] xl^.£

K[i~[ 0|5H &A|-X|-gO| -^-S B|r^a.CH| | 0^7|Jl ^i-^- 7[-# I_[-E|-L.H7| HHS-Oil 7ij3|-woj X|-5.£|- X|-0

'B &nx-H4.28)2\ S-y(concern) ^-E (ISO ?! 7(^x1 (values).

- 36 - Sen §o| risk reduction

ISO ^3 m^tl Z\±EL(4.7)2l aa*W ShS(4.1) Si 22K4.2) *-& o|»

-AS/NZS 4360:1999

as 21a

^Sfi a|^3(4.7)2f ^Sshoi SJ-»(4.1) 5! S2K4.2) *^ (ISO o|# a^# #o|7| mm If. S2|)

- 37 - xh^S

risk optimization

ISO flz| a|^a.(4.7)fih aa°ho^ ^g^ 3JiK4.2)ah n 4|-»(4.1)»

Eh £ot g£j

1. eha •g•oô^|A^ EI^H SI^SI-^ EI^H ^^(4.22)011 $g# ^^. as H|a 2. al^ra. si^jste u|# S! Sî s?j ## ±S-§I-^ a|â. 7| S(4.14)o|| cc|-#cK 3. a|>:=L XH|CH(4.13)011 cc|-# a|â(4.7)£ JiBi^ ^ Si^K Hjâ(4.7)fif aa°h(H -^§5) aaK4.2)sh n ^-»(4.1)» (ISO S|C})5hS^ ^§5j 32K4.2)Sh ^L Sj-»(4.1)# Sl^Sh^h^

- 38 - ^ *o,«a)

risk retention

ISO S3 -1 ^^ nr^Hburden of loss) ^-S- o|-=- jenfit of gain)—1 ^r-§-.

gj-xj ^"-§- •^J'EHS. ^^0)1 c|)sj- *!j°]o| -AS/NZS ^j •x'cl"® -S^l LH o|| A-| •^j'^'sl-c" S 4360:1999

as 21a || ^-sj-si- c4|-g-(426)o| i-4 c|-^. T^EJ-O)!

E]O| ^-y YcKburden of loss) ^^ (ISO (benfit of gain)£j T^§. §21)

- 39 - risk transfer

ISO =ftA ^r# 2.z\2\ ^^t} £|^a.(4.7)S-¥-N2| ^-y -x-EKburden of loss) *^ o|^ s||a|(benfit of gain)s| g^.

- S^H^L-I- Til at, Ml, a â| &-SOII °|si| ^-yoji CH S> ajojom £±}o\\ cut!- xH§5j îh# ^ll3ôlMI y?|^ ^, -AS/NZS alâ. g^l-t s*i| EE-^ -^-g- a|^:H# i-aiîH^ c(-# 4360:1999 -AS/NZA - S^!2£, 7i|°t# #sn, filom 7|E^ êf« #sH aj?jo| HB141 Lh ^^ v&€ c^s iÂ^xô^|7^| ois*i-b ^, s^ #EI :1999 sj £|^3 Q-^- EE-^ a fi^-g-S c|-# 505. o|*!§[••£•

1. £|^a S?K4.25)-^ MS *^ ^# Ti|°t# #SH §9f

2. ai^iH. S7K4.25)-fe- 7|^°| a|^:3.# TS^W-I- AH^S

3. -E^(4.27)s| XHbHT:|(relocation)^ alâ. 37F7I- o[-u|cK 4. B^j *e A|ng^ o>jo|| o|§|) ojcGj EI^HSI 517^ g as £j2 x|•E|7^^ x|§^ ^ 01 CK 5. a|i3 M^ Sh£i£j?:| Sf€- £|^HS| $°J# Stmch 6. g5j°^L-F Tilet, fit, n ^|a| ^S# #^H B.|âoi| °| th ^-ôil cHS). ^?jom £A]oi| ens- XHS^ ^-3# x)| 3 *l-o||?l| 37^fe 7J25 S*|| at -¥-^- H-Iâ.# #E|SH ^^ cf# ^§°S "Hy7|^ ft£ x|S*}cK

cf# ^«|jif ^Sih a|^3(4.7)S^E]oj ^^j ifg-(burden of (ISO loss) *•& o|s. s)|S|(benfit of gain)2| g^. SSI)

- 40 - *r^

SO! So, risk treatment

ISO fl1^ £|^:a(4.7)# asH^P •?-l §1-04 CW •s-yj-°Kmpa^nrp)-§- -MEHgi.77

-AS/NZS 4360:1999 : **;; £;; ^1 jQj JQJ -=-1_ ^.1 5U H U 0 L c^ AH CU -=-1 "~i ^Q1 gU -=-1 -AS/NZA HB141 :1999

2. 2.1^:3. ^H#(4.24) S|

liaai-aflWsi tiais ai-aa assia 4. a|i:3 cH-5-E- cHgj

5^ E|±3 « «e S,^,K *,»,« fio,^K S^A,

He a,ia M, *„. «7W ,,,H a «."* «*'' Kmeasure)# =1-3(4.7). «^.irr w^ ^° (ISO

- 41 - \ -goi ^^

source

ISO ^3 £|^HS| 3JiK4.2)# &eH» 7|-fe^# 7FS A^# a^ ##.

(hazard)# s|n|iJ-c:^(|So/iEC Guide 51 #2) as sia 2. e§! ^-g- S5io|a|-lli i!-c|-. 3. S|^:HS| §J°JO| £j-^ A|-2O|t_|- A)-#o| -M-E|| ^S g^Sjo

(ISO a|^3.s| 32K4.2)# ^HH» 7F^-^# 7l*\ Mm ££•& ##. S2|)

- 42 - Sol §CH stakeholder iso ^n

5!£g o|Al£j^ ojccj 7[|o|) Wcf ss 5x|

-AS/NZS - S|A^go|L-|. 1^|CH| ^XHS g§§ ^7iU(. bj.^f cr^ ^ 4360:1999 &» ^>« 5!H£ ^z]-E|t ?H£l om £.*\ E|- ô|: gsj -AS/NZA - s|A|-agom syîoii o^gt# ^.ûh HJ.?^^ §Si @>fec|. HB141 :1999

B|^a(4.7)ol| ejsH S»# ^FJl Stf BMM- *^ SSi (ISO 5 g># 5!°.S e!^j5jfe oi^ 7H°I? SE*- ^^ 3E !. Sal)

- 43 - ifl-§-•

a. ISO ^^ draftl-

ifl-g-1-ol §010^0]

safety) o_

- 44 - 1. KS A 84021997/ISO 8402:1994 2. ISO 704 : 1987, Principles and methods of terminology. 3. ISO 860 : 1996, Terminology work - Harmonization of concepts and terms. 4. ISO 3534-1 : 1993, *7f|^ - ^fl ^ 7]s - 5. KS A 9000 : 2000/ISO 9000 : 2000, ^ % 6. ISO 10241 : 1992, International terminology standards - Preparation and Layout. 7. IEC 50(191) : 1990, ^4 ^7]^^7l ^ 8. KS A 8402 : 1997/ISO 8402 : 1994, 9. ISO/IEC Guide 2 : 1996, g.^$\- ^ ZL ^^#^-^1 1^^ °d# -g-

- 45 - A.

No. •gof KS-Soj PSA-SO] 1 probability 2 consequence 3-^1" S s1

3 event ArZd ^ AJ-AI- 4 interested party oi§u &n*[ 5 mitigation im ^ &Sr 6 residual risk 7 risk 8 risk acceptance 9 risk analysis £|^3 -S-^ 10 risk assessment 11 risk avoidance £|^H 5|3l| 12 risk communication ai^a. SSLHS- 13 risk control £|^5L Xi|CH 14 risk criteria £|^3. 7|§ ^ia 7is 15 risk estimation £|^3 ^§

16 risk evaluation 17 risk identification £|r^3 ^S

18 source identification

19 risk management £|^3 £!-ai

20 risk management system a|^3 &a| A|^.ai ?ll -si-a.| Til % 21 risk perception £|^3 £J^J 22 risk reduction a|^H ^i?j-

23 risk optimization a|^3 s|^|2|-

24 risk retention ^i^ II|-X|, *mt s.^

25 risk transfer

26 risk treatment 27 source 28 stakeholder

- 46 - B.

&£) safety.

prevention of dangers and injueies, hazard prevention.

- 47 - ISO 14001/KS A

3.11

3.6 *}}•§•if-^(product standard)

a/ JZ i.

Guide 2]

- 48 - KS A 14050ASO 14050

ISO 10241 : 1992 ^xff -g-°} rfz? - ^H? g?

safety.

(f&'dff&litJ) prevention of dangers and injueies, hazard prevention,

3.22

3.6 zff-§-f?^(product standard)

JZ 2.

Guide 2]

- 49 - •£-<>/

A}cH£K3aZHSA| mm *II3 1981.12.31 a« xil 35322 x|| S 1982. 8. 9 °4 x|| 108892 3-&7HS 1990. 1.13 x|| 42202 SS^HS 1990 7 14 SI x|| 130532 ?H§ 1993.12.27 sit ^H9 1991. 2. 1 S x|| 132822 as 23^3S) 1991.12.31 S x|| 135632 1994.12.22 Sir x|| 48262 1993. 3. 6S x|| 138702 1995.10.19 S x|| 147872 1995. 1. 5 s» x|| 49162 1997. 5.16 S xil 153722 1996.12.31 at x|| 52482 1997. 6.11 23 xll 153892 1999. 2. 8 Si x|| 58862 1999. 6. 8 23 xil 163882 2000. 1. 7 as x|| 61042 2000. 8. 5 23 xil 169475

- 50 - ^-m- c. KS

KS X 0000 2™ (ISO TBD : 1999)

2000 y «1 "B KS

^^r ^1^ X 0000 Risk management terminology - Guidelines for use in standards

(risk management)^ ^S^H TT^HH 4-§-*r SM ^«t 5J°ltk ISCHM 7ltf°J Risk management terminology - Guidelines for use in standards*

1. ^-8- «fl

1. 0} *]% 2. °1E1<& (clause)B--S- af-g ^ 514. 3. 'iHsl 2. sit- '^l^si' el-if-

4 °1 ^1^-gr KS

/SO 7C4 •' 1987, Principles and methods of terminology. ISO 860 • 1996, Terminology work - Harmonization of concepts and terms. ISO 3534-1 : 1993, Statistics - Vocabulary and symbols - Part 1. Probability and general statistical terms. ISO/DIS 9000 •' 2000, Quality management system - Fundamentals and vocabulary. ISO 10241 •' 1992, International terminology standards - Preparation and Layout. I EC 50(191) • 1990, International Electronical Vocabulary '• Dependability and quality of services. ISO/IEC Guide 2 : 1996, Standardization and related activities - General vocabulary. ISO/IEC Guide 51 '• 1999, Safety aspects - Guidelines for their inclusion in standards.

3. 5)^:3.

^-%(context)°11 1-* Aov*(context)°fl

4. 51^3.

4.1 ^-l-(probabi]ity)

(%••£: A>AJ", 4.3)*>1

1. Sj-g-s] ^eh^ ^Slfe- "^^ ^^^ 4?i(random event)

3. sj-#iL4 «l£(frequency)7V ei^H-i 4. SJ-g-ofl cHt> ^-g-S] =g£fe- "sl?l(rare)/-M-7r:gL(unlikely)/.a.-i-(moderate)/7l-^(likely)/>H£l (almost certain)" 4-& Ml3* T1 ti^(incredible)/^i-^ ^^g-(improbable)/ 7^217} ^(remote)/ (occasional)/ 7rig-(probable) /^l^ (frequent)"^ ^-& t>^S.*l a^=! §--3-(ranks) »14 (classes)7l- ^ ej 5] ^

4.2 (consequence)

(4.3)s] ^l--i-(outcome).

3. 514.

4.3

set of circumstances)s-l 2. 3.

4.4 ol^l ^r^ll^} (interested party)

«H^ 22)51 ^oll tflsfl ^-^-^ ^sfl^r^l- 7}& ^^ i^- 7fl«l.(ISO/DIS 9000 : 2000)

4.5 ^# ^^ ^ (mitigation)

4.6 ^^ ^i:3 (residual risk)

Hi A3 rfl-§-(4.26) «1^°1] ^o>^^ S]i3(4.7).

1. ^^ *-8-°flfe ISO/IEC Guide 51

4.7 el^a (risk)

1. °]^. ^-f^lfe 51^3^ i^>4^ ^(deviation) 2. ^>^4 ^-^^ 4€ ^^-(issues)-g- ISO/IEC 51 ^"

4.8 ^ A a. ^-g. (risk acceptance)

e|A3.j M>6}S-O]^. ^^(decision to acccept).

Hi 51 r-§-(acceptanceH

2. B]i3 ^-g-(4.8)-£- ^^3. 7l^(

4.9 B) i3 ^^ (risk analysis)

(systematic use). «131 ^=-^- ^-§-(4.26), e|i 7l»hbasis)- 4. 2. ^a.^1]^ QA ^(historical data), <>l€-* ^sfl(informed opinions), *}• ?fl XK4.28) 51 S-8-^(concerns)* £«•« 41 %4- 3. ##$3 5]i3 -g-^-8: ISO/IEC Guide 51

4.10 e) ^ s% 7} (risk assessment)

4.11 (risk avoidance)

-§-(action).

1. sj^

4.12 2)^ (risk communication)

*K4.28) (exchange).

1. 2} ^3. ^iia^:^ ^jife Zli3(4.7)2] ^^ (existence), ^ (nature) ^tj(forai),

(probability), #£(severity), T-§-^(acceptability), tfl-§-(treatment), 7M nfs

4.13 B)^ (risk control)

Ml 51 1. S]i3. Xl<>l(4.13)fe ^-^1 (monitoring), -^(compliance)

4.14 el^ (risk criteria)

^(significance)^- -•=-

^(priority), 2 assessment)°11 4.15 el^a. ^r3 (risk estimation)

u] ja.

4.16 $^3. ^7Krisk evaluation)

-B-a]-^(significance)* =13*1-71 ^^-^ ^<^^! e]^a. 71^(414)^ e) ^3.(4.7)

1. E]i3 sg7|-fe zl^3.S>\ ^-§-(acceptance) %••& cD-g-(treatment)s] ^^»ll ^.aajAS. 4-§-«J-

2. t>^ #^2) e)>i3 3g7>fe ISO/IEC Guide 51 #2.

4.17 e)i3. ^^(risk identification)

43.

1. Jlifc-i-oflfe 5^(4.27), 4^(4.3), ^4(4.2), ^-#(4.1) ^ 2. Bâ ^-^^r ^^1^}(4.28)S1 ^Â}6)1 ^-^^ â-f AJXV^ ^ 514.

4.18 -?^1 T1-1^ (source identification)

>fe 43.

1. ^ ^-°Hl^fe ^^ ^^ (hazard identification)°1 ^3. tb^.(ISO/IEC Guide 51

4.19 21^3. ^el (risk management)

1. $ + 3- ^Bife ^BVÂS ejâ s§7> « ^-^(4.10), â cfl-§-(4.26), ?lia ^-§-(4.8), H^ 2. ei^

4.20 2jiS. ^r^ *l^s1§ (risk management system)

1. 3*31 Ai^^a] A&o||fe ^[^^1^, 214^^ %• e]^ 2.

4.21 Bl^a. ?1^| (risk perception)

s-Tg e)^3* B>e}a.^- ^^1^}(4.28)^ ^^ (concern) ^^r ^^ 7]-*] (values).

1. e)ia °1^-g- a*ltl- ^ACneeds), € 2. e|^a -a^^- 7^3°1 4S.S}- 4#

4.22 ej^a. ^^- (risk reduction)

4.23 s| ia s^ ^ 3} (risk optimization)

1. ^l^i T°H^ Aia ^^^fe alia ^^(422)^1 2. el^ 3. e]i

4.24 ^^a. ^.-S- (risk retention)

^(burden of loss) ^^8- «>1^- afl^(benfit of gain)^

2. alia >i-fr(4.24)fe- H.^* 5£*lv «fl-§-(4.26)«>M 4.25 21^:3. #7r(risk transfer)

4€- 2^4 ^S^ E]i3(4.7)S^Bl«) £^ «-^(burden of loss) $r-& o] (benefit of gai

2. e^^ 3. 5-^(4.27)^ Til«H^(relocations $£-

4.26 Bj^3 tfl-S-Crisk treatment)

2. E]i 3. s]i

4.27 ^41 (source)

1. •?>•# •S-^ofl'H 5-€^r 3^(hazard) ^-^ ^^5-i(hazard)°]4. (ISO/IEC Guide 51

4.28 ^74]^} (stakeholder)

7fl?lf

2. A.I (12-14

a^ 1, 2, 3 -g- B, C^

A.2 2)^

e§! (4.27)

£|^3 (4.7)

mm (4.D

Al-ZJ (4.3)

a^ (4.2)

E|^:3 *1|CH (4.13)

iSME 2-1^3. (4.6) A.3 2]i

E|^H aa| (4.19) E|^H £^ SI S^ (4.10) al^a s*j (4.9) SS! ^S (4.17) E|>:3 ^S(4.15) alr^a. S^^ (4.16) alia. 01 #(4.26) a|^3. S|E| (4.11)

alia, si^jsh (4.23)

E|^3 x-ia (4.22) EI^H S& (4.5) a|i3. 3 71- (4.25) Eli3 M4f (4.24) alia. ^S (4.8) alia. gMjae (4.12)

A.4 21^

alia aai A,^a (4.20)

alia 7|^ (4.14)

£W|XF (4.28)

O|SD ^l*I- (4.4)

alia °]^ (4.21) M

INIS

KAERI/TR-1782/2001

0|§s| (MMISU) (TR,

=?• (MMISH)

2001 «d

o| 60 p. #( V ), 26 Cm.

V Dl

(15-20SMI2I)

W a5

H-I, , AM S^ a| && ISO ^^ draft

ife 5S0| f. •& KS X 0000 : 2001 (ISO TBD : 1999) 'a|>h=L 5J- §] (Risk management terminology - Guidelines for use in standards)' 2.S. £ BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHEET Performing Org. Sponsoring Org. Standard Report No. INIS Subject Code Report No. Report No. KAERI/TR-1782/2001

Title/ Subtitle A Review on the Risk Management Terminology for the Use in Standards

Project Manager Lee, Yong Hee (MMIS Team) and Department Researcher and Lee, Jung Woon (MMIS Team) Department

Publication Publication Taejeon Publisher KAERI 2001.3 Place Date Page 60 p. II. & Tab. Yes( V ), No ( ) Size 26 Cm.

Note Classified Open( V ), Restricted! Report Type Technical Report Class Document Sponsoring Org. Contract No.

Abstract (15-20 Lines)

Subject Keywords product safety, risk, risk management, product liability, (About 10 words) terminology, definition.