DOCSLIB.ORG

Linking Schizophrenia Symptoms, Schizotypy, and Normal Personality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linking Schizophrenia Symptoms, Schizotypy, and Normal Personality Schizophrenia Bulletin doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz005 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/schbul/sbz005/5310427 by [email protected] on 27 August 2019 Common Taxonomy of Traits and Symptoms: Linking Schizophrenia Symptoms, Schizotypy, and Normal Personality David C. Cicero*,1, Katherine G. Jonas2, , Kaiqiao Li2, Greg Perlman2, and Roman Kotov2 1Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI; 2Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY *To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 808-956-3695, fax: 808-956-4700, e-mail: [email protected] The associations among normal personality and many Introduction mental disorders are well established, but it remains Trait-based paradigms, which have treated psychopa- unclear whether and how symptoms of schizophrenia and thology as fully dimensional, have been useful in under- schizotypal traits align with the personality taxonomy. standing psychopathology, particularly internalizing and This study examined the joint factor structure of nor- externalizing disorders.1–3 The Hierarchical Taxonomy mal personality, schizotypy, and schizophrenia symptoms of Psychopathology (HiTOP) seeks to improve on tra- in people with psychotic disorders (n = 288) and never- ditional diagnostic systems, such as the Diagnostic and psychotic adults (n = 257) in the Suffolk County Mental Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and Health Project. First, we evaluated the structure of International Classification of Diseases (ICD), and con- schizotypal (positive schizotypy, negative schizotypy, and ceptualize psychopathology dimensionally.4 A major mistrust) and normal traits. In both the psychotic-disor- dimension within HiTOP is the psychotic spectrum, der and never-psychotic groups, the best-fitting model had which ranges from normal personality to schizotypal 5 factors: neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, traits to frank psychosis. Schizotypy also reflects a liabil- agreeableness, and psychoticism. The schizotypy traits ity for the development of schizophrenia.5–8 The dimen- were placed on different dimensions: negative schizotypy sional conceptualization is supported by evidence that went on (low) extraversion, whereas positive schizotypy psychotic disorders form a continuum with schizotypal and mistrust went on psychoticism. Next, we added symp- traits,9–15 and schizotypal traits fit well in the personal- toms to the model. Numerous alternatives were compared, ity taxonomy alongside normal traits.16,17 An alternative and the 5-factor model remained best-fitting. Reality dis- view of schizotypy is that it is quasi-dimensional, and tortion (hallucinations and delusions) and disorganiza- previous work has not definitely resolved this issue.9,13 tion symptoms were placed on psychoticism, and negative Some research has demonstrated that psychosis exists on symptoms were placed on extraversion. Models that sepa- a continuum with normal perceptual experiences whether rated symptom dimensions from trait dimensions did not examined with latent variable mixture models18 or taxo- fit well, arguing that taxonomies of symptoms and traits metric methods.19,20 This study aims to identify where are aligned. This is the first study to show that symptoms schizotypy fits within other spectra of psychopathology of psychosis, schizotypy, and normal personality reflect regardless of whether the underlying construct is dimen- the same underlying dimensions. Specifically, (low) extra- sional or categorical. Previous research strongly supports version, negative schizotypy, and negative symptoms form that other psychopathology spectra included in HiTOP one spectrum, whereas psychoticism, positive schizotypy, parallel dimensions of normal personality and extend and positive and disorganized symptoms form another. into maladaptive extremes2,3,21–23 (although some recent This framework helps to understand the heterogeneity research suggests that normal personality characteris- of psychosis and comorbidity patterns found in psychotic tics are separate from personality disorders on a genetic disorders. It also underscores the importance of traits to level24). Recent theorists have noted that personality understanding these disorders. pathology is often neglected in schizophrenia research,25 and unlike other spectra, the psychotic spectrum has not Key words: psychoticism/mistrust/detachment/positive been comprehensively studied vis-à-vis the taxonomy of symptoms/negative symptoms normal personality. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] Page 1 of 13 Psychosis and Personality This mapping is especially complicated because psychotic model or form additional dimensions. This study sought to symptoms are multidimensional, with structural studies address this issue by performing the first-factor analysis of finding at least 2 factors of positive and negative symp- all relevant dimensions. First, we examined the joint struc- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/schbul/sbz005/5310427 by [email protected] on 27 August 2019 toms.26–28 The positive symptom factor includes reality dis- ture of schizotypy and normal personality traits in psy- tortion (delusions and hallucinations) and disorganization chotic-disorders and never-psychotic samples. We tested (bizarre behavior and formal thought disorder), and the alternative models that reflect organizations suggested in negative symptom factor includes inexpressivity (flat affect the literature. Next, in the psychotic-disorders sample, we and alogia) and avolition (avolition and asociality).29–32 added symptoms of schizophrenia, again comparing all Maladaptive personality traits relevant to psychosis organizations suggested in the literature. These analyses typically are labeled schizotypy and are also multidi- were designed to determine whether schizophrenia symp- mensional. This domain includes an array of perspec- toms, schizotypy, and normal personality fall along the tives including risk factors,5,6,33–36 prodromal signs and same major spectra, and help to understand heterogeneity symptoms,37–41 maladaptive traits,42–45 and personality within psychotic disorders from the perspective of traits. disorders.10,46,47 Across perspectives, schizotypy includes at least 2 dimensions, positive (anomalous perceptions Methods and beliefs) and negative (anhedonia and social with- drawal).48,49 These dimensions also have been labeled Participants psychoticism and detachment.4,36 Some studies observed Data came from the Suffolk County Mental Health Project, additional factors,50–54 among which the placement of a longitudinal epidemiologic study of first-admission mistrust—sometimes termed suspiciousness or para- patients with psychosis.84–86 The psychotic-disorders group noia—has been inconsistent. Models have grouped was recruited from 12 psychiatric inpatient units of Suffolk mistrust with positive schizotypy,51,55,56 negative schizo- County, NY, between 1989 and 1995. Inclusion criteria were typy,52,57 antagonism/disagreeableness,58,59 or found a sep- first admission within 6 months, psychosis, ages 15–60, intel- arate factor,53,60–62 including large multinational studies.63 ligence quotient >70, proficiency with English, resident of Multiple models have been proposed to organize per- Suffolk County, and no apparent medical etiology for psy- sonality, and the most studied includes 5 traits: neu- chotic symptoms. Patients were followed over 2 decades, and roticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, 288 completed the personality assessment at the 20-year time and openness.64 Some theorists have hypothesized a link point. The never-psychotic group (N = 257) was recruited between maladaptive openness and psychoticism/positive using random digit dialing to zip codes where the psy- schizotypy,65 but observed correlations are weak and often chotic disorder group resided (for sampling procedure see nonsignificant.66–69 Openness is largely unrelated to other Velthorst et al87). The study was approved annually by the forms of psychopathology,23 and neuroticism, extraver- institutional review boards of Stony Brook University and sion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness have emerged as participating hospitals. All participants provided written in- the normal personality characteristics relevant to mental formed consent. See table 1 for the demographic character- disorders. Schizotypy does not fit fully into this taxonomy. istics of the samples. Socioeconomic status was measured Detachment typically maps onto low extraversion53,70,71 or with the Hollingshead Index of Socioeconomic Status.88 forms a distinct dimension.51,55 In contrast, psychoticism/ Four participants in the never-psychotic group were positive schizotypy has been consistently found to form a excluded due to excessive missing data. Demographic in- dimension distinct from normal personality.66–68,72–75 formation was available for 373 participants in the psy- It is less clear how schizophrenia relates to normal per- chotic-disorders group at 20-year wave, 85 of whom did sonality because few investigations assessed both relatively not provide information necessary for present analyses and rare psychotic disorders and normal personality. A meta- were excluded. These participants did not significantly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.21255609; this version posted April 30, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study Matthias Kirschner, MD1,2*; Benazir Hodzic-Santor, BA1*; Mathilde Antoniades, PhD3; Igor Nenadic, MD4; Tilo Kircher, MD PhD4; Axel Krug, PhD4;29; Tina Meller, PhD4; Dominik Grotegerd, PhD6; Alex Fornito, PhD5; Aurina Arnatkeviciute, PhD5; Mark A Bellgrove, PhD5; Jeggan Tiego, PhD5; Udo Dannlowski, MD PhD6; Katharina Koch, PhD6; Carina Hülsmann, MSc6; Harald Kugel, PhD35; Verena Enneking, MSc6; Melissa Klug, PhD6; Elisabeth J. Leehr, PhD6; Joscha Böhnlein, MSc6; Marius Gruber, MSc6; David Mehler, PhD6; Pamela DeRosse, PhD7,30,31; Ashley Moyett, MSc7; Bernhard T. Baune, MD PhD6,8; Melissa Green, PhD9,32; Yann Quidé, PhD9,32; Christos Pantelis, MD10; Raymond Chan, PhD 11; Yi Wang, PhD11; Ulrich Ettinger, PhD12; Martin Debbané, PhD13; Melodie Derome, PhD13; Christian Gaser, PhD14; Bianca Besteher, MD14; Kelly Diederen, PhD3; Tom J Spencer, PhD3; Paul Fletcher, MD, PhD36; Wulf Rössler, MD15,33,34; Lukasz Smigielski, PhD15; Veena Kumari, PhD16; Preethi Premkumar, PhD16; Haeme R. P. Park, PhD17; Kristina Wiebels, PhD17; Imke Lemmers-Jansen, PhD18; James Gilleen, PhD3,19; Paul Allen, PhD19; Petya Kozhuharova, MSc19; Jan-Bernard Marsman, PhD20; Irina Lebedeva, PhD21; Alexander Tomyshev, MSc21; Anna Mukhorina, PhD21; Stefan Kaiser, MD22; Anne-Kathrin Fett, PhD3,23; Iris Sommer, MD PhD20; Sanne Schuite-Koops, PhD20; Casey Paquola, PhD1; Sara Larivière, MSc1; Boris Bernhardt PhD1; Alain Dagher, MD1; Phillip Grant, PhD24; Theo G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic and Environmental Sources of Resemblance Between Normative Personality and Personality Disorder Traits K
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Psychiatry Publications Dept. of Psychiatry 2017 The Genetic and Environmental Sources of Resemblance Between Normative Personality and Personality Disorder Traits K. S. Kendler Virginia Commonwealth University, [email protected] S. H. Aggen Virginia Commonwealth University Nathan Gillespie Virginia Commonwealth University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/psych_pubs Part of the Psychiatry and Psychology Commons © 2017 The uiG lford Press Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/psych_pubs/75 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Dept. of Psychiatry at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychiatry Publications by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors K. S. Kendler, S. H. Aggen, Nathan Gillespie, M. C. Neale, G. P. Knudsen, R. F. Krueger, Nikolai Czajkowski, Eivind Ystrom, and T. Reichborn-Kjennerud This article is available at VCU Scholars Compass: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/psych_pubs/75 Journal of Personality Disorders, Volume 31(2), 193-207, 2017 © 2017 The Guilford Press RESEMBLANCE BETWEEN NORMATIVE PERSONALITY AND PD TRAITS KENDLER ET AL. THE GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCES OF RESEMBLANCE BETWEEN NORMATIVE PERSONALITY AND PERSONALITY DISORDER TRAITS K. S. Kendler, MD, S. H. Aggen, PhD, Nathan Gillespie, PhD, M. C. Neale, PhD, G. P. Knudsen, PhD, R. F. Krueger, PhD, Nikolai Czajkowski, PhD, Eivind Ystrom, PhD, and T. Reichborn-Kjennerud, MD Recent work has suggested a high level of congruence between normative personality, most typically represented by the “big five” factors, and abnor- mal personality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Personality and Self-Determination of Exercise Behaviour David K
    Personality and Individual Differences 36 (2004) 1921–1932 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Personality and self-determination of exercise behaviour David K. Ingledew a,*, David Markland b, Kate E. Sheppard b a School of Psychology, University of Wales, Brigantia Building, Bangor LL7 2AS, UK b School of Sport, Health, and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK Received 13 January 2003; received in revised form 30 June 2003; accepted 11 August 2003 Abstract There is extensive evidence that personality traits are associated with health-related behaviours, but less evidence regarding the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we examined the relationships between personality and self-determination of exercise behaviour. Users of a sports centre completed personality scales (the NEO Five Factor Inventory supplemented with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Psych- oticism scale) and exercise self-determination scales (Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire which measures extrinsic, introjected, identified and intrinsic forms of regulation). Analyses were restricted to 182 individuals in the maintenance stage of exercise participation. Partial correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between each personality scale and the self-determination scales, controlling for other personality scales, gender and age. Neuroticism was associated with more introjected regulation, extraversion with more identified and intrinsic regulation, openness with less external regulation, consci- entiousness with less external regulation and more intrinsic regulation, and psychoticism with more external regulation. Relating these findings to self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), it is speculated that extraverted individuals are able to feel self-determined because exercise can satisfy the need for relatedness, conscientious individuals because exercise can satisfy the need for competence.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Psychoticism: Distinctive Influences of Three Personality Dimensions in Adolescence
    481 British Journal of Psychology (2013), 104, 481–494 © 2012 The British Psychological Society www.wileyonlinelibrary.com Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and psychoticism: Distinctive influences of three personality dimensions in adolescence Patrick C. L. Heaven1*, Joseph Ciarrochi2, Peter Leeson3 and Emma Barkus3 1Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, Australia 2University of Western Sydney, Australia 3University of Wollongong, Australia Researchers have suggested that the psychoticism (P) personality dimension of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire may be largely redundant with the agreeableness (A) and conscientiousness (C) constructs of the five-factor model. Little research has examined the distinctiveness of these constructs. We utilized a multi-wave, multi- method design to examine the ability of C, A, and P to uniquely predict a number of important outcomes amongst high school students. A total of 778 students (391 males, 387 females; mean age 15.41 years.) completed personality measures in Grade 10. Self- reported self-esteem, social support, health-related behaviours, religious values as well as teachers’ assessments of students, were collected 1 and 2 years later. A, C, and P were distinctive in their ability to predict these outcomes, after controlling for gender and socio-economic status as well as Grade 10 extraversion, openness, and neuroticism. The individual P items explained unique variance over and above that explained by A and C. It was concluded that P is not merely the opposite of A and C. Implications for interventions are raised. As it has been claimed that personality has important consequential outcomes (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006), an important question for personality and individual difference researchers therefore is to what extent personality dimensions differ in their ability to predict outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia
    The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia: The Muse and the Mad Hatter By Paul Kiritsis The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia: The Muse and the Mad Hatter By Paul Kiritsis This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Paul Kiritsis All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3165-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3165-9 For Christos Stamboulakis TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ...................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... xi Foreword........................................................................................................................ xiii Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One ..................................................................................................................... 7 Schizophrenia as a Social Construct Chapter Two .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Adaptive Significance of Personality Traits It Is Clear That in Order for a Trait to Have Survived, It Must Have Had Some Degree of Functionality
    The Adaptive Significance of Personality Traits It is clear that in order for a trait to have survived, it must have had some degree of functionality. This suggests that shifting environmental pressures, particularly social ones, encouraged a range of variation on a number of traits (Buss, 1991). Furthermore, traits that were at one time adaptive, may be maladaptive in the present environment. We shall now examine the three and five factor models to discuss how they might have been adaptive. Neuroticism is associated with the ability to perceive and respond to environmental warnings associated with impending punishment. Being elevated on this trait makes people more vulnerable to spurious and inappropriate contingencies associated with being too sensitive to future punishment. A person who scores high on this trait, for example, might be more likely to develop a phobia. In some situations persons who score high on this trait would have a reproductive advantage. They might be more likely to avoid dangers. On the other hand, persons who scored low might be more likely to engage in reproductive behaviors that were accompanied by a risk. Males low in neuroticism could also gain reproductive advantage by engaging in high risk behaviors that increased their social status and consequently their level of attractiveness to females. Extraversion or surgency is related to the need for cortical stimulation (Eysenck, 1997). People who are extraverted become more bored more quickly. They also demonstrate faster habituation to a stimulus, especially intense stimuli. Being extraverted might be reproductively advantageous in males by motivating them to mate with many different partners, a quantitative strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Dimensions in Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication and External Validation of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Psychology, Department of Department of Psychology Winter 12-12-2016 Defining Dimensions In Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication And External Validation Of The chiS zotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU). Elaina Montague University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons Montague, Elaina, "Defining Dimensions In Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication And External Validation Of The chiS zotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU)." (2016). Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Department of Psychology. 90. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss/90 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Department of Psychology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Defining Dimensions in Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication and External Validation of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU). by Elaina Montague, M.A. A Research Proposal Presented to the Faculty of The Clinical Psychology Training Program In Fulfillment of the Masters-Equivalent Research Project (MERP) Proposal
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13. Measures of Sensation Seeking
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From Marvin Zuckerman and Anton Aluja, Measures of Sensation Seeking. In: Gregory J. Boyle, Donald H. Saklofske and Gerald Matthews, editors, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. Oxford: Academic Press, 2014, pp. 352-380. ISBN: 978-0-12-386915-9 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Academic Press. Author’s personal copy CHAPTER 13 Measures of Sensation Seeking Marvin Zuckerman1 and Anton Aluja2 1University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA 2University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain The sensation seeking construct is defined as: ‘A trait defined by the seeking of varied, novel, complex, and intense sensations and experiences, and the willingness to take physical, social, legal, and financial risks for the sake of such experience’ (Zuckerman, 1994, p. 27).
    [Show full text]
  • Extraversion
    Prepared for the Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior Mark Leary & Richard Hoyle (Editors) Guilford Extraversion Joshua Wilt and William Revelle Northwestern University For at least 2500 years, some people have been described as more bold, assertive and talkative than others. For almost equally long, this set of behaviors has been thought to have a biological basis and be socially important. Although our taxometric techniques have changed and our theories of biology are more advanced, the question of the causal basis as well as the behavioral consequences of the trait dimension that has come to be called extraversion-introversion1 remains vitally important. In general, there are at least three basic characteristics of extraversion that make it important to study. First, extraversion has emerged as one of the fundamental dimensions of personality (Costa & McCrae, 1992a; Digman, 1990; H. J. Eysenck & Himmelweit, 1947; Goldberg, 1990; Norman, 1963). As such, extraversion has the potential to explain the covariation of a wide variety of behaviors, which is is one of the central concerns for the field of personality (Funder, 2001). Second, extraversion predicts effective functioning and well-being across a wide variety of domains (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006) from cognitive performance (Matthews, 1992) and social endeavors (Eaton & Funder, 2003) to social economic status (Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007). Third, extraversion predicts risk and also resilience for different forms of psychopathology (Trull & Sher, 1994; Widiger, 2005). 1Although occasionally one will see extroversion-introversion, the preferred spelling in psychological re- search is extraversion-introversion. For purposes of brevity we refer to the bipolar dimension of introversion- extraversion by referring to just one end of it, extraversion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Placement of Hypomania Within a Structural Model Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa THE PLACEMENT OF HYPOMANIA WITHIN A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY INCLUDING THOUGHT DISORDER AND INTERNALIZING SPECTRA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN PSYCHOLOGY DECEMBER 2017 By Jonathan R. Cohn Thesis Committee: David Cicero, Chairperson Charlene Baker Charles Mueller Keywords: structural psychopathology, schizotypy, hypomania, OCD, thought disorder Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Current Study .....................................................................................................................14 Method ..........................................................................................................................................15 Participants ........................................................................................................................15 Materials ............................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Definition and Measurement Psychoticism Of
    Person. individ. D$ Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 757-785, 1992 0191-8869/92 $5.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain Pergamon Press Ltd THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOTICISM H. J. EYSENCK Professor Emeritus of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of London, London, England (Received 5 December 1991) Summary-In this paper an attempt is made to answer certain questions and criticisms concerning the concept of psychoticism (P) as a dimension of personality. The points addressed are: (1) Is it reasonable to talk about psychosis as a unitary concept, rather than about separate, unrelated disorders (schizo- phrenia, manic-depressive disorder)? (2) Is such a concept generalizable to form a continuum of ‘psychoticism’ with normality? (3) Is psychoticism related to psychopathy rather than to psychosis? (4) What methodology can be used to answer questions like those raised above to make answers more compelling than the suggestive naming of psychometric factors? It is suggested that an experimental approach must be combined with a psychometric one to obtain answers which go beyond the sterility often associated with a purely correlational approach, as suggested by Cronbach (1957; American Psychologisr, 12, 671484). INTRODUCTION In 1952, I suggested that in addition to neuroticism (N) and introversion-extraversion (E) there existed a third major dimension of personality, called psychoticism (P) which was orthogonal to N and E (Eysenck, 1952). Work testing various deductions from this hypothesis has been published periodically (Eysenck, Granger & Brengelmann, 1957; Eysenck, 1970a; Eysenck & Eysenck, 1976; Eaves, Eysenck & Martin, 1989) with largely positive results; reviews of the many studies generated by the original theory have been published by Claridge (1981, 1983) and Zuckerman (1989; Zuckerman, Kuhlman & Camac, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Personality
    Molecular Psychiatry (2003) 8, 840–852 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/mp FEATURE ARTICLE Genetics of personality: are we making progress? S Van Gestel1 and C Van Broeckhoven1 1Department of Molecular Genetics, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB8), University of Antwerp (UIA), Antwerpen, Belgium For centuries, scientists are intrigued by the differences in personality between individuals. As early as in the ancient Greek civilization, people tried to formulate theories to systematize this diversity. With the increased interest in behavior genetics, personality was also considered a challenging phenotype. From the early start, studies suggested a heritable component in personality. After the successes of molecular genetic studies in unraveling the genetic basis of (mostly) monogenic diseases, the focus shifted towards complex traits, including psychiatric disorders. It was observed in several studies that personality measures differed between patients with psychiatric disorders and healthy controls. Therefore, normal personality was considered a viable endophenotype in the search for genes involved in psychiatric disorders such as affective disorders, ADHD and substance dependence. Genes that were to be found in studies on personality could be candidate genes for particular psychiatric disorders. In the course of time, however the study of genes for personality turned out to be at least as hard as the search for genes involved in other complex disorders. In this review, past studies, present problems and future directions concerning the study of personality genetics are discussed. Molecular Psychiatry (2003) 8, 840–852. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001367 Keywords: personality; temperament; character; genetics; candidate genes; polymorphisms; susceptibility Different people have different personalities.
    [Show full text]