DOCSLIB.ORG

A Report on the State of the Islands 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Report on the State of the Islands 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior OfficeofInsularAffairs AReportonthe StateoftheIslands 1999 Front cover photo compliments of Marshall Islands Visitors Authority Benjamin Graham General Manager State Of The Islands TableOfContents A Report on the State of the Islands ............................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. The Department of the Interior’s Role in the Insular Areas 1.1 The Department’s Evolving Role in Insular Affairs. ................................................................................. 2 1.2 Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999 ................................................................................................................ 2 Office of Insular Affairs .......................................................................................................................... 3 General Technical Assistance ................................................................................................................... 3 Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program ...................................................................................... 3 Insular Management Control Initiative ....................................................................................................... 3 Brown Tree Snake Control ....................................................................................................................... 4 CNMI Labor, Immigration and Law Enforcement Initiative ............................................................................ 4 American Samoa Government Operations Subsidies ..................................................................................... 4 Capital Improvement Grants ..................................................................................................................... 4 Compacts of Free Association ................................................................................................................... 5 Fiscal Assistance to U.S. Territories ........................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Major Issues and Initiatives ................................................................................................................ 5 Federal-CNMI Initiative on Labor, Immigration and Law Enforcement ............................................................. 5 American Samoa Government Financial Management System and Recovery Plan ............................................... 6 Freely Associated State Economic Restructuring .......................................................................................... 7 Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the North American Numbering Plan ....................................................... 7 Rongelap Resettlement ........................................................................................................................... 8 Statistics Improvement Initiative ............................................................................................................... 8 Coral Reef Initiative ............................................................................................................................... 8 Palau Road Projects ................................................................................................................................9 Compact Impact .................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2. American Samoa .................................................................................... 10 2.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Political Status Developments and Federal Relations ............................................................................. 10 2.3 The Economy ................................................................................................................................11 2.4 Government .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.5 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................13 Electric Division .................................................................................................................................. 14 Water Division .................................................................................................................................... 14 Waste Water Division ............................................................................................................................ 15 Solid Waste Division ............................................................................................................................ 15 Roads ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Village Rural Road Development Program ................................................................................................ 15 Road Drainage Improvement Program ...................................................................................................... 15 Sea Walls, Revetments and Shore Protection .............................................................................................. 15 Road Maintenance Fund ........................................................................................................................ 16 Seaports ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Airport .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Schools .............................................................................................................................................. 17 Hospitals ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Charts ................................................................................................................................................ 19 I State Of The Islands Chapter 3. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands .................................................. 24 3.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2 Political Status Developments and Federal Relations ............................................................................. 24 3.3 The Economy ................................................................................................................................26 3.4 Government Administration ............................................................................................................. 27 3.5 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................27 Water System ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Waste Water System ............................................................................................................................. 28 Power Generation and Distribution .......................................................................................................... 28 Solid Waste Disposal ............................................................................................................................ 29 Roads ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Airports ............................................................................................................................................. 30 Ports ................................................................................................................................................. 30 Public Buildings .................................................................................................................................. 30 Health Facilities ................................................................................................................................... 30 Charts ................................................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 4. Guam ................................................................................................ 36 4.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 36 4.2 Political Status Developments and Federal Relations ............................................................................. 36 Guam Commonwealth .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 American Samoa Passive Acoustic Monitoring Site ROSE Rose Atoll
    American Samoa Passive Acoustic Monitoring Site ROSE Rose Atoll, American Samoa Ecological Acoustic Recorder (EAR) 14-March-2008 to 16-July-2009 Level 1 Analysis of Passive Acoustic Observations1 Synopsis This document provides a level 1 analysis of the data obtained from ecological acoustic recorder (EAR) unit 9300638B041 deployed at Rose Atoll from March 12th 2008 to March 4th 2010. The EAR unit recorded acoustic data from March 14th 2008 to July 16th 2009. This initial report contains background information about the site, time-series of total acoustic energy, and analyses of event-triggered recordings. Background Monitoring the changing status of coral reef environments and associated biota is a critical management need and a considerable technological challenge, especially on reefs in remote locations. The Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) Coral Reef Ecosystem Division (CRED), in partnership with the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), is using natural ambient sounds as a way to characterize the activity of marine organisms on coral reefs and in surrounding waters. By deploying a device known as the Ecological Acoustic Recorder (EAR), a cost-effective tool for recording biological and anthropogenic sounds, CRED investigates and monitors the presence and activity of sound-producing marine life and human activity. The EAR can be left in place unattended for up to two years, depending on the instrument’s configuration. Passive acoustic observations are typically not compromised by bio-fouling. The EAR records the local ambient acoustic environment on a programmed schedule and is also triggered to record by high amplitude transient events, such as engine noise from passing vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S
    Southeast and Caribbean Sarah Workman, Becky Barlow, and John Fike Sarah Workman is the associate director of the Highlands Biological Station, University of North Carolina; Becky Barlow is an associate professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University; John Fike is an associate professor, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech. Description of the Region (fig. A.15). All of these land uses provide significant produc- tivity and income. The Southeast encompasses physiographic Cropland and pastureland occupy significant portions of land provinces, or ecoregions (Wear and Greis 2012), that have area in the Southeastern United States. Forests occupy from 50 unique climate, fire history, and composition of vegetation. to 69 percent of the land within each State in the region From the physiographic province of the Appalachian Mountains Figure A.15. Acres of land­use categories of the 11 Southeastern States. (Map and table prepared by William M. Christie, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC). Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions 189 to the alluvial plains of the Mis sissippi River Basin, within land use outside developed zones is perhaps best viewed in deciduous forests of Kentucky and Tennessee and the Interior terms of the nature of woody plant cover and whether animals Highlands of the Ozarks, to the Piedmont, Flatwoods, and are excluded or allowed access. Both Puerto Rico and the U.S. Coastal Plains, a large portion of the land area is appropriate Virgin Islands are experiencing a trend toward an increase in for implementing several types of agroforestry, integrating woody cover with the loss of agricultural land and pastureland either crops or livestock, or both, with trees and woody (Brandeis and Turner 2013a, 2013b; Brandeis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa
    Coral Reef Habitat Assessment for U.S. Marine Protected Areas: U.S. Territory of American Samoa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA’s National Ocean Service Management & Budget Office Special Projects February 2009 Project Overview About this Effort NCCOS Benthic Habitat Mapping Effort The United States Coral Reef Task Force (USCRTF), in both its National The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Action Plan to Conserve Coral Reefs (2000) and its National Coral Reef Ocean Service (NOS) initiated a coral reef research program in 1999 to Action Strategy (2002), established a key conservation objective of pro- map, assess, inventory, and monitor U.S. coral reef ecosystems (Monaco tecting at least 20% of U.S. coral reefs and associated habitat types in et al. 2001). These activities were implemented in response to require- no-take marine reserves. NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program has ments outlined in the Mapping Implementation Plan developed by the Map- been supporting efforts to assess current protection levels of coral reefs ping and Information Synthesis Working Group (MISWG) of the Coral Reef within Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and quantify the area of U.S. coral Task Force (CRTF) (MISWG 1999). NOS’s National Centers for Coastal reef ecosystems protected in no-take reserves. The official federal defini- Ocean Science (NCCOS) Biogeography Team was charged with the de- tion of an MPA, signed into law by Executive Order 13158, is “any area of velopment and implementation of a plan to produce comprehensive digital the marine environment that has been reserved by federal, state, tribal, coral-reef ecosystem maps for all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokelau the Last Colony?
    Tokelau The last colony? TONY ANGELO (Taupulega) is, and long has been, the governing body. The chairman (Faipule) of the council and a village head ITUATED WELL NORTH OF NEW ZEALAND and (Pulenuku) are elected by universal suffrage in the village SWestern Samoa and close to the equator, the small every three years. The three councils send representatives atolls of Tokelau, with their combined population of about to form the General Fono which is the Tokelau national 1600 people, may well be the last colony of New Zealand. authority; it originally met only once or twice a year and Whether, when and in what way that colonial status of advised the New Zealand Government of Tokelau's Tokelau will end, is a mat- wishes. ter of considerable specula- The General Fono fre- lion. quently repeated advice, r - Kirlb•ll ·::- (Gifb•rr I•) The recently passed lbn•b'a ' ......... both to the New Zealand (Oc: ..n I} Tokelau Amendment Act . :_.. PMtnb 11 Government and to the UN 1996- it received the royal Committee on Decoloni­ • •• roltfl•u assent on 10 June 1996, and 0/tlh.g• sation, that Tokelau did not 1- •, Aotum•- Uu.t (Sw•ln•J · came into force on 1 August 1 f .. • Tllloplol ~~~~~ !•J.. ·-~~~oa wish to change its status ~ ~ 1996 - is but one piece in ' \, vis-a-vis New Zealand. the colourful mosaic of •l . However, in an unexpected Tokelau's constitutional de­ change of position (stimu- velopment. lated no doubt by external The colonialism that factors such as the UN pro­ Tokelau has known has posal to complete its been the British version, and decolonisation business by it has lasted so far for little the year 2000), the Ulu of over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Regional Consultation on Water in Small Island Countries
    PACIFIC REGIONAL CONSULTATION ON WATER IN SMALL ISLAND COUNTRIES PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS Sigatoka, Fiji Islands 29 July - 3 August 2002 Editors: Clive Carpenter, Jeffry Stubbs, Marc Overmars - for 3rd World Water Forum only - PACIFIC REGIONAL CONSULTATION ON WATER IN SMALL ISLAND COUNTRIES PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 29 JULY – 3 AUGUST 2002 SIGATOKA, FIJI ISLANDS Editors: Clive Carpenter, Jeffry Stubbs, Marc Overmars PRELIMINARY RELEASE – FOR USE AT THE THIRD WORLD WATER FORUM, KYOTO, JAPAN – February 2003 PUBLISHED BY THE South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission & Asian Development Bank February 2003 Copyright: Asian Development Bank & South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission This book was prepared by consultants and staff of the ADB and SOPAC (the sponsors). The analyses and assessments contained herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Directors or of the South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission and the governments it represents. The sponsors do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this book and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. The term “country” does not imply any judgment by ADB or SOPAC as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity. ii Proceedings of the Pacific Regional Consultation on Water in Small Island Countries CONTENTS PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................v FOREWORD .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographic Assessment and Overview National Park of American Samoa
    PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 152 ETHNOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT AND OVERVIEW NATIONAL PARK OF AMERICAN SAMOA November 2006 Jocelyn Linnekin1, Terry Hunt, Leslie Lang and Timothy McCormick 1 Email: [email protected]. Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut Beach Hall Room 445, U-2176 354 Mansfield Road Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2176 Ethnographic Assessment and Overview The National Park of American Samoa Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures iii List of Slides v Preface: Study Issues vi Maps vii Key to Maps x I. The Environmental Context 1 Climate and Vegetation 1 The National Park Environments 4 II. Archaeology and Samoan Prehistory 8 Early Settlement 8 Later Inland Settlement 9 Late Prehistoric Period 9 European Contact and the Historical Period 10 Archaeology in the National Park Units 10 III. Research Methodology 15 Documentary Phase 15 Field Research 15 Limitations of the Research 17 IV. Ethnohistory 22 Myths and Legends Relevant to the Park 22 The European Contact Period 25 Western Ethnohistorical and Ethnographic Reports 31 V. Agriculture and Domestically Useful Plants 46 Tutuila Unit 46 Ta'u Unit 49 Ofu Unit 51 Summary 52 VI. Marine Resources 53 Tutuila Unit 53 Ta'u Unit 57 Ofu Unit 58 Summary 61 i VII. Medicinal Plants 63 Ofu Unit 63 Ta'u Unit 66 Tutuila Unit 66 Summary 67 VIII. Analysis of Freelist Data 75 Crops and Cultivated Plants 76 Medicinal Plants 81 Fish and Marine Species 84 Animals and Birds 86 Summary of the Freelist Results 88 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa Power Authority P.O
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street b San Francisco, CA 94105 December 14, 2007 In Reply Refer To: WTR-7 Michael Keyser, Acting CEO American Samoa Power Authority P.O. Box PPB Pago Pago, AS 96799 Re: July 16-19, 2007 Clean Water Act Inspections Dear Mr. Keyser: Enclosed is the December 14, 2007 report for our July 16-19 diagnostic inspection of the American Samoa Power Authority (“ASPA”), Tutuila Island sewage treatment works. We found that the ASPA wastewater utility functions as designed and up to capability. The sewage treatment plants and their sewer collections systems are well run and maintained. The staff is trained, largely experienced, and capable to successfully operate and maintain plant and equipment. However, funding is not linked to the sewer services and lessened engineering capability has made it difficult to accomplish capital improvement projects. Future compliance largely depends on whether the NPDES permits are reissued with 301(h) waivers intact, and how compliance with the water quality standards will be measured. Without the waivers, future capital costs associated with treatment plant upgrades to full secondary treatment could range up to above $20 million. The main requirements and recommendations of this inspection are summarized below: • ASPA should complete the upgrade of the Airport force main and the rehabilitation of the Malaloa lift station. • ASPA should complete a rate study to determine the costs to operate and maintain the wastewater sewerage works as well as the costs of capital improvements. • ASPA should consider reinstating formal staff training through courses in the operation and maintenance of plant and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice
    CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES WORKING DOCUMENT NO. 152 SEPTEMBER 2000 A STABILITY PACT FOR THE CAUCASUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE - A SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE MICHAEL EMERSON NATHALIE TOCCI AND ELENA PROKHOROVA CEPS Working Documents are published to give an early indication of the work in progress within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 92-9079-309-0 © Copyright 2000, Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci and Elena Prokhorova A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice - A Supplementary Note CEPS Working Document No. 152, November 2000 Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci & Elena Prokhorova* Abstract In response to appeals of the leaders of the South Caucasus for a Stability Pact for the region, CEPS published in May 2000 a consultative document with a comprehensive proposal (available on www.ceps.be). Subsequently the authors have held extensive consultations with the leaders in all three states of the South Caucasus, and in four of the key autonomies (Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia, Adjaria, Ossetia). The present paper draws together the information and ideas collected during these consultations, although the conclusions are only attributable to the authors. The main argument of the original document is maintained, and strengthened with more precise views on how the conflicts might be solved within the framework of a Stability Pact. However the proposed Stability Pact process could be more than just an approach to conflict resolution. It has systemic or even constitutional aspects, with elements to overcome the transitional problems of the weak state and ease the confrontations of traditional notions such as independence versus territorial integrity, or the choice between federation and confederation, which are part of the present impasse.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER II Planning Area Profile for Hazard Mitigation Analysis
    CHAPTER II Planning Area Profile for Hazard Mitigation Analysis 24 Territory of American Samoa Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A U.S. Territory since 1900, American Samoa is located in the central South Pacific Ocean, 2,300 miles south-southwest of Hawaii and 1,600 miles east-northeast of New Zealand. American Samoa has a total land area of approximately 76 square miles and consists of a group of five volcanic islands and two atolls (Rose Atoll and Swains Island). The five volcanic islands, Tutuila, Aunu’u, Ofu, Olosega, and Ta’u, are the major inhabited islands. Tutuila is the largest island and the center of government. Ofu, Olosega, and Ta’u, collectively are referred to as the Manu’a Islands. Figure 1 Base Map of American Samoa depicts all of the islands of American Samoa. Figure 1. Base Map of American Samoa. The five volcanic islands, Tutuila, Aunu’u, Ofu, Olosega, and Ta’u, are the inhabited islands. At 53 square miles, Tutuila is the largest and oldest of the islands, and is the center of government and business. It is a long, narrow island lying SW-NE, is just over 20 miles in length, and ranges from 1 to 2 miles wide in the eastern half, and from 2 to 5 miles wide in the western half. Home to 95 percent of the territory’s 55,000 residents, Tutuila is the historic capitol (Pago Pago), the seat of American Samoa’s legislature and judiciary (Fagatogo), as well as the office of the Governor. Tutuila is often divided into 3 regions: the eastern district, the western district and Manu’a district.
    [Show full text]
  • Americaan Samoa Air Service Marketing Study-Phase Two Report
    American Samoa Air Transport Marketing Study Phase Two Report August 5, 2014 i American Samoa Air Transport Marketing Study Phase Two Report, August 5, 2014 Contents Recommendations ............................................................................................. i Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 8 Background for Recommendations .................................................................. 8 Task 5 and Task 6: Approaches to Expanding Air Services and Recommended Strategies to Provide Air Transport Services Capacity Needs ................... 19 1. Honolulu and the Mainland ...................................................................................... 20 2. Hawaiian Airlines and Competitors in the US Airline Industry ............................... 22 3. Apia, Manu'a and Savai’i.......................................................................................... 40 4. Neighboring Pacific Islands beyond Samoa ............................................................. 45 5. New Zealand and Australia ...................................................................................... 49 6. Changes in Federal Laws or Regulations ................................................................. 51 7. American Samoa Airports ........................................................................................ 56 8. Immigration
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC POLICY: by Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of in Dr. Jungho Baek, Committee Chair
    Tourism development and public policy: perceptions of the Chuukese community Item Type Thesis Authors Perez, Gerald San Agustin Download date 05/10/2021 09:13:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/10527 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC POLICY: PERCEPTIONS OF THE CHUUKESE COMMUNITY By Gerald San Agustin Perez A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rural Tourism Development: Interdisciplinary Program University of Alaska Fairbanks May 2019 APPROVED: Dr. Jungho Baek, Committee Chair Dr. Fred Schumann, Committee Co-Chair Dr. Jennifer Caroll, Committee Member Dr. Ansito Walter, Committee Member Dr. Mark Herrmann, Dean School of Management Dr. Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School Abstract Tourism is a widely used tool for economic development in small insular communities. This mixed methods study examines factors that influence residents' perceptions toward tourism development in Chuuk and the relevance of “complexity theory” in describing the island's stage of development. Empirical evidence and data triangulation corroborate general support for tourism development and sensitivity to cultural impacts, economic impacts, social impacts, environmental impacts, local control and sustainability. Economic and cultural impacts were the strongest factors influencing perceptions and are most significant to sustainable development and destination development. This reflects residents' beliefs that the island will benefit from tourism because of perceived improvements in the economy, infrastructure, tourist facilities and expanded social amenities. It also reflects residents' expectations for long term planning, managed growth, and laws to protect the environment. Some differences and similarities are noted between sampled residents living in Chuuk and Guam.
    [Show full text]