DOCSLIB.ORG

The Development Potential of Tourism and Agriculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Development Potential of Tourism and Agriculture The Development Potential of Tourism and Agriculture A Study of Newly-established Serb-majority Municipalities in Southern Kosovo Working TowaTowardsrds a Stable Multi-Ethnic Kosovo Executive Director: Adrian Zeqiri Contributors Authors: Marija Krstid and Nicola Brassil Editor: Carlo Giovannone Contributor: Gazmen Salijevid Proofreading: Jessica Templeman Acknowledgements ECMI Kosovo would like to thank the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland for its financial support for the development of this publication, in the framework of the project ‘Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive Growth for all Newly-established Municipalities in Kosovo’. ECMI Kosovo www.ecmikosovo.org ECMI Kosovo is the principal non-governmental organisation engaged with minority issues in Kosovo, with the overarching aim to develop inclusive, representative, community-sensitive institutions that support a stable multi-ethnic Kosovo. ECMI Kosovo contributes to the developing, strengthening and implementation of relevant legislation, supports the institutionalisation of communities-related governmental bodies, and enhances the capacity of civil society actors and the government to engage with one another in a constructive and sustainable way. Str. Nëna Terezë Nr. 41, Apt. 29, Str. Cika Jovina Nr. 3, 1stFl, 10000 Prishtinë/Priština, Kosovo, 38220 Mitrovica/Mitrovicë North, Kosovo, Tel. +381 (0) 38 224 473 Tel. +381 (0) 64 00 55 488 Copyright © European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Kosovo, December 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the ECMI Kosovo. Str. NënaTerezë Nr. 41, Apt. 29,Prishtinë/Priština, Kosovo, Tel. +381 (0) 38 224 473 www.ecmikosovo.org, [email protected] Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Participants ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Questionnaires .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 8 3 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN RANILUG/RANILLUG AND PARTEŠ/PARTESH ............................... 9 3.1 Number of Farms .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Number of Farmers ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Number of Livestock ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Number of Crops ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.5 Quality of Available Land ................................................................................................................ 11 3.7 The Cooperation System of Farmers .............................................................................................. 12 3.8. Benefits of Agricultural Hubs ......................................................................................................... 13 3.9 Municipality Support for the Development of Agriculture ............................................................. 14 3.10 Open Market ................................................................................................................................. 14 3.11 The Selling of the Agricultural Products........................................................................................ 15 3.12 Competition from Other Municipalities........................................................................................ 15 3.13 Overall Agricultural Production .................................................................................................... 15 3.14 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 16 4 DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN GRAČANICA/GRAÇANICË, NOVO BRDO/NOVOBËRDË, KLOKOT/KLLOKOT AND ŠTRPCE/SHTËRPCË .......................................................................................... 17 4.1 Number of Visitors .......................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Tourist Attractions .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Tourist Organisations and Tourist Information Centres ................................................................. 19 4.4 Tourism Web Pages ........................................................................................................................ 20 4.5 The Capacity and Quality of Accommodation ................................................................................ 21 4.6 Availability of Traditional Cuisine .................................................................................................... 22 4.7 Quality of Local Transportation ...................................................................................................... 22 4.8 Connection Roads ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.9 Ecological Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 24 4.10 Affability of the Locals ................................................................................................................... 24 | 3 4.11 Cultural and Other Events ............................................................................................................. 25 4.12 The Existence of Souvenir Shops .................................................................................................. 26 4.13 Desired Change ............................................................................................................................. 26 4.14 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 27 ANNEX A ................................................................................................................................................ 28 ANNEX B ................................................................................................................................................ 30 | 4 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ECMI European Centre for Minority Issues TSIGAN Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive Growth for all Newly-established Municipalities in Kosovo | 5 1 INTRODUCTION This study was conducted as part of the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Kosovo’s project ‘Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive Growth for all Newly-established Municipalities in Kosovo’ (TSIGAN). The project, which runs from February 2014 to January 2017, aims to promote strong and effective local governments for sustainable growth by increasing the capacities of local governments to fully and effectively implement their roles under the Ahtisaari plan, the Constitution of Kosovo and the Law on Local Self-Government. The objective is to benefit local communities by establishing growth-oriented policies at the municipal level. Furthermore, TSIGAN endeavors to empower local communities and vulnerable groups for inclusive growth. Active participation and engagement of all local communities, and vulnerable and marginalised groups, in the decision-making process, in social life, and in local economic development is desired.1 Prior to the TSIGAN project, ECMI brought about positive changes in a number of Serb- majority Municipalities as part of the ‘Decentralisation Project’. These included the establishment of the ‘Association of Serbian Entrepreneurs’ (Asocijacija Srpskih Privrednika, ASP) in Gračanica/Graçanicë in December 2012, the registration of the ‘Businessmen Association of Novo Brdo/Novobërdë’ in June 2013, and the establishment of the ‘Tourist and Spa Office of Klokot/Kllokot’ (Turisticka Organizacija Spa Klokot, TOSK) in June 2013.2 In 2014, ECMI Kosovo began working to strengthen economic attractiveness and to promote local tourism and agriculture in the Serb-majority Municipalities of Gračanica/Graçanicë, Novo Brdo/Novobërdë, Klokot/Kllokot, Štrpce/Shtërpcë, Ranilug/Ranillug and Parteš/Partesh. In order to realise these goals, ECMI Kosovo has both been working to support and promote existing structures in the Municipalities where they exist, and creating the conditions necessary for the establishment in Municipalities where they are missing.3 In light of these improvements, TSIGAN continues to promote local tourism and agriculture in the Serb majority Municipalities. This study consists of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the current potential for the development of agriculture and tourism in newly established Serb-majority Municipalities in Southern Kosovo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Effective Governance Activity Quarterly
    LOCAL EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE ACTIVITY QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT January 1, 2019 – March 31, 2019 CONTRACT NO. 7201678C00001 APRIL 15, 2019 This publication is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the International City/County Management Association and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. USAID Local Effective Governance Activity – Quarterly Performance Report, January 1st, 2019 – March 31st, 2019 This page intentionally left blank for double-sided printing. USAID Local Effective Governance Activity – Quarterly Performance Report, January 1st, 2019 – March 31st, 2019 USAID Local Effective Governance Activity QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT CONTRACT NO. 7201678C00001 Program Title: USAID Local Effective Governance Activity Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Kosovo Contract Number: 72016718C00001 Contractor: International City/County Management Association Date of Publication: April 15, 2019 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. USAID Local Effective Governance Activity – Quarterly Performance Report, January 1st, 2019 – March 31st, 2019 ACRONYMS AKM Association of Kosovo Municipalities AWP Annual Work Plan CSO Civil Society Organizations CYAC Central Youth Action Council CYM Community Youth Mapping ICMA International
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid Advancing Kosovo Together Local Solution
    USAID ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION FINAL REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2014 – DECEMBER 30, 2018 JAN 2019 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Community Development Fund, with inputs from Project Partners Kosovo Relief Development KRD; Centre for Peace and Tolerance and AKTIV NGO. USAID ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION Cooperative Agreement No: AID–167–A–14-0008 FINAL REPORT October 1, 2014 – October 30, 2018 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or those of the United States Government TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 3 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW/SUMMARY ................................................................... 5 1.1 Project description/Introduction ................................................................... 5 2. ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER LOCAL SOLUTION (AKT-LS) ................. 7 2.1 GRAČANICA/GRAÇANICË ......................................................................... 7 2.2 KLLOKOT/KLOKOT..................................................................................... 9 2.3 NOVO BRDO/NOVOBËRDË ..................................................................... 10 2.4 PARTEŠ/PARTESH .................................................................................. 11 2.5 RANILUG/RANILLUG ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “ADVANCING YOUTH, PEACE and SECURITY in KOSOVO TOGETHER” 28 – 29 June 2017
    SUMMARY REPORT KOSOVO1 CONSULTATION FOR THE PROGRESS STUDY ON YOUTH, PEACE AND SECURITY 1st UN KOSOVO YOUTH ASSEMBLY “ADVANCING YOUTH, PEACE AND SECURITY IN KOSOVO TOGETHER” 28 – 29 June 2017 1 All references to Kosovo in the present publication should be understand to be in compliance with UN Security Council resolution 1244 (1999). 2 UNITED NATIONS MISSION IN KOSOVO KOSOVO CONSULTATION FOR THE PROGRESS STUDY ON YOUTH, PEACE AND SECURITY CONTENTS OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 4 B. OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................... 5 C. PARTICIPANTS ....................................................................................................................................... 6 D. PROFILE OF THE SPEAKERS .................................................................................................................... 6 E. ORGANIZERS AND FACILITATORS .......................................................................................................... 6 F. YOUTH TASK FORCE ............................................................................................................................... 7 II. SUMMARY OF THE SESSIONS....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of an Internal Dialogue on Kosovo Serb Integration
    Policy Analysis No. 07/2020 The importance of an internal dialogue on Kosovo Serb integration - December 2020 1 Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. legalpoliticalstudies.org 2 Policy Analysis 07/2020 The importance of an internal dialogue on Kosovo Serb integration Author: Marije Renate Luitjens Tol December 2020 © Group for Legal and Political Studies, December, 2020. The opinions expressed in this report do not reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies. For the purposes of promoting and supporting freedom of speech, GLPS publishes this report. In addition it does not reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies “Rexhep Luci‟ str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Website: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 *Affiliated International Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies 3 THE IMPORTANCE OF AN INTERNAL DIALOGUE ON KOSOVO SERB INTEGRATION “We want to live in peace with our neighbors – we want to be able to go and visit Pec [Peja] freely” Petar, a Ranilug/Ranillug resident1 This quote shows the deep ethnic divisions that are still alive in Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • KLOKOT-VRBOVAC KLLOKOT-VËRBOC KLLOKOT-VËRBOC 2 Invest in KLOKOT - VRBOVAC KLLOKOT - VËRBOC
    KLOKOT-VRBOVAC MUNICIPALITY OF KLOKOT-VRBOVAC KLLOKOT-VËRBOC KLLOKOT-VËRBOC 2 Invest in KLOKOT - VRBOVAC KLLOKOT - VËRBOC For Contact Details Visit us at: hƩ ps://kk.rks-gov.net/kllokoƟ Layout and Design: www.rrota.com 3 SERBIA MONTENEGRO Mitrovicë/Mitrovica 3HMs3Hý Prishtinë/Priština Gjilan/Gnjilane *MDNRYsĂDNRYLFD Ferizaj/Uroševac Klokot-Vrbovacvac Prizren/Prizren Kllokot-Vërboc ALBANIA MACEDONIA 4 Foreword by Mayor he municipality of Klokot-Vrbovac/Kllokot-Vërboc is one of Suitable taxes on start-ups and businesses that employ large Tthe newly established municipalities in Kosovo, following the number of employees; decentralization process. Klokot-Vrbovac/Kllokot-Vërboc has a bright Effective administration; future with a promising attractive location within the territory of Good civil services; Kosovo. This is a useful advantage that will bring future benefi ts, but it Appropriate economic development strategy; is also faces a path fi lled with potential obstacles and challenges. It is an Building a nationwide marketing approach for rural tourism honor and great opportunity for me as a leader, and my staff, to follow and thermal bathing; and the best practices to administer effectively to promote this lovely place General strategy for capitalizing on its young population. surrounded by large cities of Kosovo and to offer great potential for its citizens and neighboring citizens. Lately, through the help of our donors we are focused on identifying locations for investment opportunities that are available Klokot-Vrbovac/Kllokot-Vërboc has three comparative advantages: to potential investors through simpler administrative procedures, natural resources, mineral water springs and land suitable for supportive communication with national government institutions, growing all kinds of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Serb Community
    COMMUNITY PROFILE: SERB COMMUNITY 1. POPULATION SIZE AND LOCATION The Serbs comprise the largest minority community in Kosovo. The 2011 Kosovo census did not take place in northern Kosovo, and was boycotted by considerable numbers of Serbs in southern Kosovo. Therefore, estimates of the Serb community in Kosovo have to be based on alternative sources. Based on OSCE 2010 Community Profiles and 2013 OSCE Municipal Profiles, around 146,128 Serbs are estimated to reside in Kosovo, making up around 7.8% of the total population. The Serb community is approximately equally divided between northern Kosovo (70,430 Serb residents) and southern Kosovo (75,698 Serb residents). There are a total of ten municipalities where the Serb community constitutes a numerical majority. The largest Serb communities reside in the four northern municipalities, and in the southern municipalities of Gračanica/Graçanicë and Štrpce/Shtërpcë. Smaller Serb communities can also be found throughout Kosovo below the Ibar River, particularly in Central and Eastern Kosovo. Serb community in Kosovo accordinG to OSCE Reports* Municipality PercentaGe Number of community members Mitrovicë/Mitovica North 76.48% 22,530 Gračanica/Graçanicë 82.15% 21,534 Leposavić/Leposaviq 96% 18,000 Zvečan/Zveçan 96.1% 16,000 ZubinPotok 93.29% 13,900 Štrpce/Shtërpcë 70.58% 9,100 Novo Brdo/Novobërdë 61.46% 5,802 RaniluG/RanilluG 97.15% 5,718 Parteš/Partesh 99.96% 5,300 Gjilan/Gnjilane 5.29% 5,000 Kllokot/Klokot 71.23% 3,500 Vushtrri/Vučitrn 4.79% 3,500 Kamenicë/Kamenica 8.01% 3,019 Obiliq/Obilić
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Changes in the Ethnic Structure of the Population in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija
    Bulletin of Natural Sciences Research DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/bnsr10-25625 Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, pp. 23-27. Original Scientific Paper CONTEMPORARY CHANGES IN THE ETHNIC STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN THE AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE OF KOSOVO AND METOHIJA SAŠA MILOSAVLJEVIĆ1, JOVO MEDOJEVIĆ1 1Faculty of Sciences, University in Priština – Kosovska Mtrovica, Kosovska Mtrovica, Serbia ABSTRACT Twenty years (1999 - 2019) after the end of the conflict in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija, it can be stated that nowhere in Europe is there such ethnic segregation of the population as is the case with the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. Following the withdrawal of pumped security forces from the entire territory of Kosovo and Metohija and the entry of the United Nations peacekeeping force into the Serbian Autonomous Province, Kosovo Albanians carried out their persecution from Kosovo through terrorist attacks on Serbs and other non- Albanian populations (Montenegrins, Gorans, Roma, Ashkali) carried out their persecution from Kosovo and Metohija and fundamentally changed the ethnic structure of the Province. An insight into the majority of 223.081 exiles and displaced persons from Kosovo and Metohija indicates an exodus against the Serbs. The number of displaced Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians is estimated at about 100.000. The mass persecution of the Serb and other non-Albanian populations has resulted in tremendous changes in the ethnic structure of the Province, which today, with 93% of the total population, is dominated by Albanians, while other ethnic communities have a participation of 7%. Кeywords: Population, Ethnicity, Kosovo and Metohija. destroyed. The same tendencies have continued to this day, along INTRODUCTION with the desecration of cemeteries, stoning and burning of the returnees’ homes (Medojević & Milosavljević, 2019a).
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Kosovo Free: Remaining Challenges
    SETTING KOSOVO FREE: REMAINING CHALLENGES Europe Report N°218 – 10 September 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. SERBS AND THE AHTISAARI PLAN .......................................................................... 4 A. SERBS IN CENTRAL INSTITUTIONS ................................................................................................ 4 B. SERBS IN POLITICAL PARTIES ....................................................................................................... 7 C. SERB CULTURE AND MEDIA ......................................................................................................... 8 1. Cultural and religious heritage ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Television ..................................................................................................................................... 9 III. DECENTRALISATION AND THE SOUTHERN SERBS ......................................... 11 A. DECENTRALISATION THROUGHOUT KOSOVO ............................................................................. 11 B. MINORITY MUNICIPALITIES ....................................................................................................... 13 1. A success story in Gračanica ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 29 Issue 1 Article 1 2-2009 Erasing the Past: Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II Igor Ordev Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Ordev, Igor (2009) "Erasing the Past: Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 29 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol29/iss1/1 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ERASING THE PAST: DESTRUCTION AND PRESERVATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Part II (Continuation from the Previous Issue) By Igor Ordev Igor Ordev received the MA in Southeast European Studies from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Previously he worked on projects like the World Conference on Dialogue Among Religions and Civilizations held in Ohrid in 2007. He lives in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. III. THE CASE OF KOSOVO AND METOHIA Just as everyone could sense that the end of the horrifying conflict of the early 1990s was coming to an end, another one was heating up in the Yugoslav kitchen. Kosovo is located in the southern part of former Yugoslavia, in an area that had been characterized by hostility and hatred practically ‘since the beginning of time.’ The reason for such mixed negative feelings came due to the confusion about who should have the final say in the governing of the Kosovo principality.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Language Compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014
    Municipal language compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 2. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 6 3. FUNCTIONING OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANGUAGE COMMISSIONER AND THE LANGUAGE POLICY NETWORK .......................................................................................... 8 4. MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAW ON THE USE OF LANGUAGES .............. 10 4.1. Adoption of municipal regulations for the recognition and use of languages at the municipal level and awareness raising activities ................................................... 10 4.2. Display of municipal signs, notices and bulletin boards ....................................... 12 4.3. Multilingual provision of services ......................................................................... 14 4.4. Interpretation during meetings of representative and executive bodies, and translation of municipal meeting documents and municipal legal acts ...................... 17 4.5. Translation of municipal websites and job vacancies ........................................... 19 4.6. Availability of interpretation and capacity of municipal translation units ........... 20 4.7. Displaying of multilingual street names and road signs ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Kosovo Together
    ADVANCING KOSOVO TOGETHER BUSINESS ATTITUDE AND LINKAGES SURVEY Potential for improvements of inter-ethnic businesses relations MARCH 2015 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by USAID Advancing Kosovo Together implemented by prime contractor Chemonics International with input from the Berman Group. 1 2 Table of contents: I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. METHODOLOGY 4 III. POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF INTER-ETHNIC BUSINESS RELATIONS 5 IV. SURVEY OF NON-MAJORITY BUSINESSES 7 1. Status of business 7 2. Barriers to growth 8 3. Customers and business linkages 9 4. Labor and employment 10 5. Business facility information 11 6. Public sector services 12 7. Overall impression 14 V. OVERVIEW OF KEY FINDINGS 15 VI. INTERVIEWS OF MAJORITY OWNED BUSINESSES 16 VII. ANNEXES: . Overview of presented investment project ideas . Business Attitude Survey form 3 I. INTRODUCTION In the course of December 2014 and January 2015 the Advancing Kosovo Together (AKT) Program completed a Business Attitude Survey in ten Kosovo municipalities with Kosovo Serb non-majority population. The structured interviews of owners and/or managers of (mostly) micro and small family owned businesses took place in Gračanica/Graçanicë, Novo Brdo/Novobërdë, Parteš/Partesh, Ranilug/Ranillug, Štrpce/Shtërpcë; Vushtrri/Vučitrn, North Mitrovica/Mitrovica e Veriut, Zubin Potok/Zubin Potok, and Zvečan/Zveçan. The objective of the survey was to provide the team of the Advancing Kosovo Together (AKT) Program with analytical information on the status, performance and future plans of target businesses. Survey items included the history and current status of the company, the nature of its business, labor and employee relations, business facility information, government services, and overall impressions of the individual municipalities as a place to do business.
    [Show full text]