The Dancing Star: Reinvestigation of Artodiscus Saltans (Variosea, Amoebozoa) Penard 1890

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dancing Star: Reinvestigation of Artodiscus Saltans (Variosea, Amoebozoa) Penard 1890 Protist, Vol. 170, 349–357, August 2019 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 21 June 2019 ORIGINAL PAPER The Dancing Star: Reinvestigation of Artodiscus saltans (Variosea, Amoebozoa) Penard 1890 a b a a,1 Efthymia Ntakou , Ferry Siemensma , Michael Bonkowski , and Kenneth Dumack a University of Cologne, Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, Zülpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Köln, Germany b Julianaweg 10, 1241VW Kortenhoef, Netherlands Submitted November 12, 2018; Accepted June 13, 2019 Monitoring Editor: Alastair Simpson Artodiscus saltans, first described by Penard (1890), has a unique morphology. Without genetic data it could not yet been reliably placed into a wider taxonomical context. We present morphological data for A. saltans from different aquatic habitats of four European countries. We subjected three cells of one strain from Germany to molecular analyses and, interestingly, obtained six different rDNA sequences. Phylogenetic analyses of these SSU rDNA sequences revealed that A. saltans branches close to the amoebozoan Multicilia marina (Variosea, Amoebozoa). © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Key words: Ribosomal genes; amoebae; Conosa; Multicilia; flagellate; Paramphitrema. Introduction 2016, Spain, as well as the records that are the subject of this publication (Table 1)). Penard (1890) described A. saltans as a reddish, Artodiscus saltans was discovered and described spherical cell, being very plastic (hence its generic by Penard in 1890 after he collected some spec- name; the prefix arto is derived from the Greek word imens from a flooded pasture near Wiesbaden, ␣␳␶ o for a piece of dough) with fast and contin- Germany. He found similar specimens in subse- uous changes of its shape during locomotion. He quent years in Lake Geneva; along its shore and noticed that, although difficult to see, the cells were in up to 30 m water depth (Penard 1905). However, surrounded by a layer of very fine ‘mucus’ in which since Penard’s description, records have been very very small plates were embedded. It was, in his scarce. In the last century it was found by Rainer words, one of the most interesting species he ever (1968), Siemensma (1973, unpubl.) and De Groot had observed, because of its ‘extraordinary mobile’ (1979). Only recently have reports of A. saltans flagella-like ‘pseudopodia’ by which the ‘animals’ increased (e.g. Frouz 2013, Czech Republic, sev- were ‘dancing vividly’ and sometimes ‘swimming eral photomicrographs and videos available online as fast as a flagellate’. In 1903 he emended his by Revello 2012, Uruguay; Opitz 2013, Austria; description, writing that the cell body usually was Voelcker and Clauß 2015, Germany, and Capilla spherical, but with a tendency to become uneven and angular, being surrounded by a distinct mem- 1 Corresponding author; fax +49 221 470 5038 branous envelope that followed every deformation e-mail [email protected] (K. Dumack). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2019.06.002 1434-4610/© 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. 350 E. Table 1. Sampling spots of A. saltans, morphological characters and reference to figures. Ntakou Sampling Coordinates Observation n Diameter Length of position of theca Fig. Habitat spots date cell body in flagella in nucleus * ** et ␮m ␮m al. Wipperfürth, 51.127368, May, 2018 1 13 × 10 34 ± 1 (n = 4) centric smooth 1 F small stream, running Germany 7.380871 water, approx. depth 15–20 cm Spiegelplas, 52.274259, 1973 1 NA NA eccentric xenosomes lake shore, sandy Netherlands 5.071945 bottom, CSSW Gaasterland, 52.885363, May, 2012 3 20–24 41 eccentric xenosomes 1D,E ditch, thick layer of Netherlands 5.561656 organic sediment, CSSW Spiegelplas, 52.261307, Jan., 2013 20 19–21 45 ecc./centric smooth/xeno. 1H lake shore, sandy Netherlands 5.067952 bottom, CSSW Sankt Ulrich, 47.534666, June, 1 9 32 centric smooth river, backwater, thin Austria 12.573009 2013 layer of organic sediment, CSSW River Saar, 49.621619, Oct., 2014 2 9–13 34–37 centric smooth 1A river, turbid running Germany 6.564232 water, between green algae on rock Laegieskamp, 52.277634, April, 2014 3 5–10 27–31 centric smooth 1C ditch, with Chara sp. Netherlands 5.136724 and Sphagnum, CSSW Naardermeer, 52.282330, Jan., 2015 5 13–15 39–47 centric smooth ditch, thick layer of Netherlands 5.119572 organic sediment, CSSW Castricum, 52.548240, Sept. 2015 2 10–15 41–52 centric smooth 1 G artificial dune pond, Netherlands 4.617177 sandy bottom, CSSW Île-Grande, 48.795937, June, 2 10–11 27–30 centric smooth old washing basin, France 3.585810 2015 brackish water, CSSW IJsselmeer, 53.074981, July, 2015 1 12 26–30 centric smooth 1B lake shore, sandy Netherlands 5.344705 bottom, CSSW CSSW = optically clear stagnant and shallow water. NA = No data available. * measured from photomicrographs; as the cells have a constantly changeable shape, we tried to estimate the diameter of a spherical cell. ** measured from photomicrographs; we only measured projections that were clearly visible. Most projections were partly out of focus. Molecular Characterization of Artodiscus saltans 351 of the cell and was covered with granules and very specimens from Spiegelplas had a centric and small plates (Penard 1903, 1904, 1905). smaller nucleus with a relatively large central nucle- Based on the unique morphological characters olus (diameters ∼4 ␮m and ∼2 ␮m respectively). of A. saltans it could not be reliably placed within Specimens from all other locations had a relatively a wider taxonomic context. Since the Thecofilosea small and more centric nucleus (diam. ∼3–5 ␮m) (Cercozoa, Rhizaria) and the Variosea (Amoebo- with a relatively large central nucleolus (Fig. 1A, B). zoa) exhibit morphological characters common to Specimens isolated from the river Wupper in Wip- A. saltans, both represent taxa that could possibly perfürth had a length of ∼13 ␮m, a width of ∼10 ␮m, ± ␮ accommodate this species. Both taxa accommo- flagella-length of 34 1 m and a span width of ∼ date eukaryvorous and bacterivorous flagellates, 80 ␮m (Fig. 1F). Measurements of all observed amoebae and amoeboid flagellates. Thecofilosean specimens are summarized in Table 1. species characteristically possess a more or All observed specimens had a flexible membra- less conspicuous organic theca, sometimes with nous theca that followed the constantly changing embedded or attached xenosomes (Dumack et al. outline of the cell. Some cells bore a theca with 2017), while variosean flagellates exhibit a protu- embedded small granules and/or rod-shaped ele- berate base from which the flagella emerge (Berney ments (Fig. 1D, E, H), while most cells had a et al. 2015). To ascertain the phylogenetic affiliation smooth theca (Fig. 1A, B, G). Only large cells of A. saltans, we obtained part of its SSU rDNA sometimes showed a small space between theca sequence and conducted phylogenetic analyses. and cytoplasm (Fig. 1E). The small elements were embedded in the membranous theca; we never observed these elements laying on the test. Results Individuals from all sampling locations had a vari- able number of flagella. Small specimens had about Ecological and Morphological 5–6 flagella and larger specimens up to 12, respec- Observations tively. However, the exact number was very difficult to count in living specimens. Although all flagella The observed and isolated specimens of A. were mobile, the cell usually had one or two flag- saltans were collected from different aquatic habi- ella that moved more actively, making slow rowing tats located in Austria, France, Germany and the movements. In fast locomotion the cell had one Netherlands (Table 1). All specimens were found leading flagellum with two trailing flagella behind in freshwater except one that occurred in slightly in the same plane, all three together shaped like a brackish water in an old fisherman’s washing pool Y (Supplementary Material Videos S1, S2). These on the French Atlantic coast, where Enteromorpha three flagella hardly moved, while the other flag- intestinalis was a dominant species. All but one ella made rowing movements in the direction of location had optically very clear water. Only the river the leading one. Despite the slow movements of Saar had turbid water; specimens there were col- the flagella, they propelled the organism relatively lected from sessile algae on a stone just below the quickly in the direction of the leading flagellum (see surface. All aquatic habitats were shallow with a Fig. 1C). Some specimens of A. saltans showed layer of organic sediment of variable thickness. The one short and stiff flagellum and at one occasion water bodies were stagnant or running. even two (Fig. 1G). When mechanically disturbed, A. saltans was never abundant in any sample. It the cells tended to swim actively to the water sur- was never found at first observation, but when wet face, making isolation a difficult task. mounts were left over for one or more days in a In larger specimens all flagella had a thickened wet chamber, specimens emerged from the debris and slightly tapering base. Using light microscopy and could be observed moving along the cover it was not possible to detect if this base was part of glass. We never found evidence that this species the flagellum or a tubular bulge of the theca (Fig. 1 multiplied in the wet mounts. Usually the cells dis- D, E, Supplementary Material Videos S1, S2). In appeared again after a few days. one specimen this base was covered by the same The cell body contained one nucleus with a kind of material as embedded in the theca. single small centric nucleolus and the cytoplasm In almost all specimens the flagella were more or appeared slightly greenish under phase con- less evenly distributed over the cell surface, but in trast. Specimens collected from Spiegelplas and material from Spiegelplas we observed some spec- Gaasterland had a relatively large, eccentrically imens that occasionally became spindle-shaped placed nucleus (diameter ∼9 ␮m) with one or three within some minutes, with 1 to 4 flagella at each small nucleoli (∼2 ␮m) (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa
    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Iden\Fying Pro\Sts in NYC Subway Samples
    Iden%fying pro%sts in NYC subway samples Julia Maritz Carlton Lab New York University Center for Genomics and Systems Biology An NYU Grand Challenge Project: Mapping the New York City “MetaGenome” coronavirus Lactobacillus Bacillus cereus Methanosarcina Cryptosporidium Stachybotrys Pro?sts are found through out the eukaryo?c tree of life Focusing on one parasi%c disease today: • Single-celled eukaryotes malaria • Free-living environmental pro%sts Blastocystis • Human/animal commensals and Toxoplasma parasites SAR Cryptosporidium Rhizaria Stramenopiles Cercozoa Radiolaria Foraminifera Alveolates Centrohelid Glaucophytes Red algae Haptophytes Green algae & land plants Cryptophytes Entamoeba Apusoza Breviata Discoba Oxymonads Trimasx Malawimonas Excavata Diplomonads Retortamonads Parabasalids Collodictyonids Eukaryotes Giardia Prokaryotes Trichomonas Bacteria Archaea (aer Roger & Simpson, 2009. Current Biology 19: R165-167.) Many pro?sts are zoono?c • Transmissible between humans, domes%c animals and wildlife • 16-20% of emerging zoonoses • Many are diges%ve and reproduc%ve parasites • Cause global poor health and economic losses Blastocystis Giardia intestinalis Cryptosporidium Entamoeba histolytica Trichomonads Toxoplasma gondii Tritrichomonas foetus • Despite this, emerging parasi%c zoonoses are neglected diseases Animal Disease Incidence Consequences • Few studies have inves%gated their emergence and spread in Cats Diahrrea ~1/3 of cats worldwide Non-fatal Cale Vaginosis, Unknown but Spontaneous abor%on, urban environments endometri%s worldwide infer%lity, herd loss Pigs Commensal 68-98% domesc pigs NA Humans Pulmonary infec%ons Unknown Exacerbate symptoms, prolong illness Project goals • Inves%gate populaon dynamics and gene%c diversity of zoono%c pro%sts present in New York City – Use NGS methods to iden%fy, track, and characterize zoono%c pro%st communi%es in NYC – Associate their presence with local wildlife and domes%c animal populaons.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Protists in Three Neotropical Rainforests Are Hyperdiverse And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/050997; this version posted November 3, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Soil Protists in Three Neotropical Rainforests are Hyperdiverse and Dominated by Parasites Fred´ eric´ Mahe´ 1, Colomban de Vargas 2;3, David Bass 4;5, Lucas Czech 6, Alexandros Stamatakis 6;7, Enrique Lara 8, David Singer 8, Jordan Mayor 9, John Bunge 10, Sarah Sernaker 11, Tobias Siemensmeyer 1, Isabelle Trautmann 1, Sarah Romac 2;3,Cedric´ Berney 2;3, Alexey Kozlov 6, Edward A. D. Mitchell 8;12, Christophe V. W. Seppey 8, Elianne Egge 13, Guillaume Lentendu 1, Rainer Wirth 14, Gabriel Trueba 15 and Micah Dunthorn 1∗ 1Department of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrodinger-Straße,¨ 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany. 2CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France. 3Sorbonne Universites,´ UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France. 4Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum London, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. 5Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, United Kingdom. 6Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloß-Wolfsbrunnenweg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. 7Institute for Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Am Fasanengarten, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany. 8Laboratory of Soil Biodiversity, Universite´ de Neuchatel,ˆ Rue Emile-Argand, 2000 Neuchatel,ˆ Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Améby Skupiny Euamoebida (Amoebozoa, Tubulinea): Vývoj Názorů Na Jejich Taxonomii a Fylogenezi
    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích Přírodovědecká fakulta Améby skupiny Euamoebida (Amoebozoa, Tubulinea): Vývoj názorů na jejich taxonomii a fylogenezi Bakalářská práce Simona Školková Školitel: Mgr. Martin Kostka, Ph.D. České Budějovice 2015 Školková, S. (2015): Améby skupiny Euamoebida (Amoebozoa, Tubulinea): Vývoj názorů na jejich taxonomii a fylogenezi. [Amoebas of the group Euamoebida (Amoebozoa, Tubulinea): Development of opinions on the taxonomy and phylogeny. Bc. Thesis, in Czech.] – 44 p., Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Annotation The study was focused on amoebas of the group Euamoebida (Amoebozoa, Tubulinea). This study attempts to clarify their taxonomy and development of opinions on their phylogeny. It also focuses on changes of naming of individual taxa, which occured during their research. Several other topics (cellular morphology of Amoebozoa, their ecology, characteristics of the families Hartmannellidae and Amoebidae and also relationships between families) are also discussed in this thesis. Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalářskou práci jsem vypracovala samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své bakalářské práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Phylogenetic Classification Of
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2002), 52, 297–354 DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02058-0 The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa Department of Zoology, T. Cavalier-Smith University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Tel: j44 1865 281065. Fax: j44 1865 281310. e-mail: tom.cavalier-smith!zoo.ox.ac.uk Eukaryotes and archaebacteria form the clade neomura and are sisters, as shown decisively by genes fragmented only in archaebacteria and by many sequence trees. This sisterhood refutes all theories that eukaryotes originated by merging an archaebacterium and an α-proteobacterium, which also fail to account for numerous features shared specifically by eukaryotes and actinobacteria. I revise the phagotrophy theory of eukaryote origins by arguing that the essentially autogenous origins of most eukaryotic cell properties (phagotrophy, endomembrane system including peroxisomes, cytoskeleton, nucleus, mitosis and sex) partially overlapped and were synergistic with the symbiogenetic origin of mitochondria from an α-proteobacterium. These radical innovations occurred in a derivative of the neomuran common ancestor, which itself had evolved immediately prior to the divergence of eukaryotes and archaebacteria by drastic alterations to its eubacterial ancestor, an actinobacterial posibacterium able to make sterols, by replacing murein peptidoglycan by N-linked glycoproteins and a multitude of other shared neomuran novelties. The conversion of the rigid neomuran wall into a flexible surface coat and the associated origin of phagotrophy were instrumental in the evolution of the endomembrane system, cytoskeleton, nuclear organization and division and sexual life-cycles. Cilia evolved not by symbiogenesis but by autogenous specialization of the cytoskeleton.
    [Show full text]
  • The TOM Complex of Amoebozoans: the Cases of the Amoeba
    Protist, Vol. 166, 349–362, July 2015 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 May 2015 ORIGINAL PAPER The TOM Complex of Amoebozoans: the Cases of the Amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and the Slime Mold Dictyostelium discoideum a,1 a,b a a Małgorzata Wojtkowska , Dorota Buczek , Olgierd Stobienia , Andonis Karachitos , a c b a Monika Antoniewicz , Małgorzata Slocinska , Wojciech Makałowski , and Hanna Kmita a Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioenergetics, Poznan,´ Poland b University of Muenster, Faculty of Medicine Institute of Bioinformatics, Muenster, Germany c Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Department of Animal Physiology and Development, Poznan,´ Poland Submitted November 14, 2014; Accepted May 14, 2015 Monitoring Editor: Saul Purton Protein import into mitochondria requires a wide variety of proteins, forming complexes in both mito- chondrial membranes. The TOM complex (translocase of the outer membrane) is responsible for decoding of targeting signals, translocation of imported proteins across or into the outer membrane, and their subsequent sorting. Thus the TOM complex is regarded as the main gate into mitochondria for imported proteins. Available data indicate that mitochondria of representative organisms from across the major phylogenetic lineages of eukaryotes differ in subunit organization of the TOM complex. The subunit organization of the TOM complex in the Amoebozoa is still elusive, so we decided to investigate its organization in the soil amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and the slime mold Dictyostelium dis- coideum. They represent two major subclades of the Amoebozoa: the Lobosa and Conosa, respectively. Our results confirm the presence of Tom70, Tom40 and Tom7 in the A.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Discosea': a New Molecular Phylogenetic Perspective On
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299374810 Phylogenomics of ‘Discosea’: A new molecular phylogenetic perspective on Amoebozoa with flat body forms Article in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · March 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.029 CITATIONS READS 7 203 6 authors, including: Yonas Tekle O. Roger Anderson Spelman College Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia … 53 PUBLICATIONS 674 CITATIONS 361 PUBLICATIONS 8,442 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Laura A Katz Xyrus Maurer-Alcalá Smith College University of Massachusetts Amherst 313 PUBLICATIONS 3,531 CITATIONS 4 PUBLICATIONS 13 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Diverse aspects of testate amoebae evolution View project All content following this page was uploaded by Yonas Tekle on 13 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 99 (2016) 144–154 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenomics of ‘Discosea’: A new molecular phylogenetic perspective on Amoebozoa with flat body forms a, b c,d c,d Yonas I. Tekle ⇑, O. Roger Anderson , Laura A. Katz , Xyrus X. Maurer-Alcalá , Mario Alberto Cerón Romero
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton Via Rho Gtpase Signalling in Dictyostelium and Mammalian Cells: a Parallel Slalom
    cells Review Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton via Rho GTPase Signalling in Dictyostelium and Mammalian Cells: A Parallel Slalom Vedrana Fili´c*, Lucija Mijanovi´c,Darija Putar, Antea Talaji´c,Helena Cetkovi´cand´ Igor Weber * Division of Molecular Biology, Ruder¯ Boškovi´cInstitute, Bijeniˇcka54, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (H.C.)´ * Correspondence: vedrana.fi[email protected] (V.F.); [email protected] (I.W.) Abstract: Both Dictyostelium amoebae and mammalian cells are endowed with an elaborate actin cytoskeleton that enables them to perform a multitude of tasks essential for survival. Although these organisms diverged more than a billion years ago, their cells share the capability of chemotactic migration, large-scale endocytosis, binary division effected by actomyosin contraction, and various types of adhesions to other cells and to the extracellular environment. The composition and dynamics of the transient actin-based structures that are engaged in these processes are also astonishingly similar in these evolutionary distant organisms. The question arises whether this remarkable resem- blance in the cellular motility hardware is accompanied by a similar correspondence in matching software, the signalling networks that govern the assembly of the actin cytoskeleton. Small GTPases from the Rho family play pivotal roles in the control of the actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Indicatively, Dictyostelium matches mammals in the number of these proteins. We give an overview of the Rho signalling pathways that regulate the actin dynamics in Dictyostelium and compare them with similar Citation: Fili´c,V.; Mijanovi´c,L.; signalling networks in mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Metatranscriptomic Census of Active Protists in Soils
    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 2178–2190 © 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Metatranscriptomic census of active protists in soils Stefan Geisen1,2, Alexander T Tveit3, Ian M Clark4, Andreas Richter5, Mette M Svenning3, Michael Bonkowski1 and Tim Urich6 1Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 2Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute for Ecology, (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands; 3Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; 4Department of AgroEcology, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK; 5Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria and 6Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria The high numbers and diversity of protists in soil systems have long been presumed, but their true diversity and community composition have remained largely concealed. Traditional cultivation-based methods miss a majority of taxa, whereas molecular barcoding approaches employing PCR introduce significant biases in reported community composition of soil protists. Here, we applied a metatranscriptomic approach to assess the protist community in 12 mineral and organic soil samples from different vegetation types and climatic zones using small subunit ribosomal RNA transcripts as marker. We detected a broad diversity of soil protists spanning across all known eukaryotic supergroups and revealed a strikingly different community composition than shown before. Protist communities differed strongly between sites, with Rhizaria and Amoebozoa dominating in forest and grassland soils, while Alveolata were most abundant in peat soils. The Amoebozoa were comprised of Tubulinea, followed with decreasing abundance by Discosea, Variosea and Mycetozoa.
    [Show full text]
  • The TOM Complex of Amoebozoans: The
    Protist, Vol. 166, 349–362, July 2015 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 May 2015 ORIGINAL PAPER The TOM Complex of Amoebozoans: the Cases of the Amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and the Slime Mold Dictyostelium discoideum a,1 a,b a a Małgorzata Wojtkowska , Dorota Buczek , Olgierd Stobienia , Andonis Karachitos , a c b a Monika Antoniewicz , Małgorzata Slocinska , Wojciech Makałowski , and Hanna Kmita a Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioenergetics, Poznan,´ Poland b University of Muenster, Faculty of Medicine Institute of Bioinformatics, Muenster, Germany c Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Department of Animal Physiology and Development, Poznan,´ Poland Submitted November 14, 2014; Accepted May 14, 2015 Monitoring Editor: Saul Purton Protein import into mitochondria requires a wide variety of proteins, forming complexes in both mito- chondrial membranes. The TOM complex (translocase of the outer membrane) is responsible for decoding of targeting signals, translocation of imported proteins across or into the outer membrane, and their subsequent sorting. Thus the TOM complex is regarded as the main gate into mitochondria for imported proteins. Available data indicate that mitochondria of representative organisms from across the major phylogenetic lineages of eukaryotes differ in subunit organization of the TOM complex. The subunit organization of the TOM complex in the Amoebozoa is still elusive, so we decided to investigate its organization in the soil amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and the slime mold Dictyostelium dis- coideum. They represent two major subclades of the Amoebozoa: the Lobosa and Conosa, respectively. Our results confirm the presence of Tom70, Tom40 and Tom7 in the A.
    [Show full text]
  • A User's Guide for Cell Biologists and Parasitologists
    1638 Eukaryotic systematics: a user’s guide for cell biologists and parasitologists GISELLE WALKER1*, RICHARD G. DORRELL2†, ALEXANDER SCHLACHT3† and JOEL B. DACKS3* 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK 2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Hopkins Building, Downing Site, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK, CB2 1QW 3 Department of Cell Biology, School of Molecular and Systems Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H7 (Received 12 November 2010; revised 22 November 2010; accepted 23 November 2010; first published online 15 February 2011) SUMMARY Single-celled parasites like Entamoeba, Trypanosoma, Phytophthora and Plasmodium wreak untold havoc on human habitat and health. Understanding the position of the various protistan pathogens in the larger context of eukaryotic diversity informs our study of how these parasites operate on a cellular level, as well as how they have evolved. Here, we review the literature that has brought our understanding of eukaryotic relationships from an idea of parasites as primitive cells to a crystallized view of diversity that encompasses 6 major divisions, or supergroups, of eukaryotes. We provide an updated taxonomic scheme (for 2011), based on extensive genomic, ultrastructural and phylogenetic evidence, with three differing levels of taxonomic detail for ease of referencing and accessibility (see supplementary material at Cambridge Journals On-line). Two of the most pressing issues in cellular evolution, the root of the eukaryotic tree and the evolution of photosynthesis in complex algae, are also discussed along with ideas about what the new generation of genome sequencing technologies may contribute to the field of eukaryotic systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Origins of Heliozoa from Flagellate Ancestors
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 93 (2015) 331–362 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista q ⇑ Thomas Cavalier-Smith , Ema E. Chao, Rhodri Lewis Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK article info abstract Article history: Heliozoan protists have radiating cell projections (axopodia) supported by microtubular axonemes Received 7 April 2015 nucleated by the centrosome and bearing granule-like extrusomes for catching prey. To clarify previously Revised 25 June 2015 confused heliozoan phylogeny we sequenced partial transcriptomes of two tiny naked heliozoa, the Accepted 10 July 2015 endohelean Microheliella maris and centrohelid Oxnerella marina, and the cercozoan pseudoheliozoan Available online 31 July 2015 Minimassisteria diva. Phylogenetic analysis of 187 genes confirms that all are chromists; but centrohelids (microtubules arranged as hexagons and triangles) are not sisters to Endohelea having axonemes in Keywords: transnuclear cytoplasmic channels (triangular or square microtubular arrays). Centrohelids are strongly Cell evolution sister to haptophytes (together phylum Haptista); we explain the common origins of their axopodia and Chromista Haptista haptonema. Microheliella is sister to new superclass Corbistoma (zooflagellate Telonemea
    [Show full text]