DOCSLIB.ORG

CRITICAL STUI)Y the Philosophy of KARL POPPER Tile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Philosophia Vol. 6 Nos. 3-4 Ps'. 463.4o Septem rDecemt'er tum / CRITICAL STUI)Y THE PhIlOSOPhY OF KARL POPPER PART!: BIOLOGY & EVOLUTIONARY EPISTEMOLOGY W.W. hARTLEY, Ill TilE PhILOSOPHY OP KARL POPPER edited by Paul A. Schilpp, Two volumes, Open Court, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle, 1974, 1323 pp., $30.00. The philosophical perspective celebrated in the latest member of the distinguished Schilpp series is the most radical yet presented in The Library of Living Philosophers. Radical for this simple reason: Sir Karl Popper is not really a participant in the contemporary professional philosophical dialogue; quite the contrary, he has ruined that dialogue. If he is on the right track, then the majority of professional philosophers tlte world over have wasted or are wasting their intellectual careers. The gulf between Popper's way of doing philosophy and that of the bulk of contemporary professional philosophers is as great as that between astronomy and astrology.* I believe that Karl Popper is on the right track. I ant a bit reluctant to admit this. For although I spent the first ten years of lny professional life in close collaboration with Popper and his ideas, I snt the second decade o( my career, only recently • elapsed, trying to avoid both. From 1 955 to 1958 I studied Popper's work intensively at llarvard despite the warnings of my teachers • there about this "difficult man". In 1958 I went to London as a kind of pilgrim to become first Popper's student and then for four I express my thanks to the following persons, who have been kind enosigh to rcad aod conitneist on all or part of this first instullrn ml, and who have sometimes protested my views: Joseph Agassi, t)onald T. Campbell, Marjorie Grene, Adolf Grbnhaum, Jagdish hiattianmadi. Michael Ilaynes, IC. Jarvie, Ass Kasiter, Stephen Ktesge, A.E. Musgrave; bun Post. Jeremy Shearmur, Avrum Stroll, Gerhard Wassermann, J.W.N, 'Watkins, and 3.0. Wisdom. I also acknow- ledge the help of grants (root the Research Foundation of the California State UnIversity, I layward. 463 L L ............... \V.W: LIAR FLEY, Ill int'eresting of living British philqsophers", there. is as yet "no body 1965 we'-years his colleague at the London School of Economics. In of informed and serious criticism of Popper's thought to draw had a row over my theory of rationality and his theory of' upon." It has been my intention in preparing this review •to demarcation; we have not spoken since. During these past ten years; contribute modestly to the creation of such a critical corpus. although I have tried in a way to avoid Popper's new work, I have- in connexion with a study of central Europemn thought between the first and second world wars -.- been investigating the origins of Popper's I bought and the Viennese milieu in which he came to Popper's discussion of biology and evolution theory dominates maturity. The initial results of my study suggested to me that the Schilpp volume as it did his most recent book: Ohjecf.i3c Popper was less original than I had at first imagined; and this Kno wiedge.' An Evolu tivnan' A pprnac/i (1972). Popper's interest in ''finding'' helped free inc from Ins influence. biology is of longstanding. I recall one day in the spring of 1959, as 1. accept e(l the assignment of reviewing the Schilpp volume in we were walking through Hyde Park together, when Popper ctis- the expectation that it would give inc an enjoyable opportunity to. cussed, in the most animated and delightful way, the issues between criticize Popper roundly. In the course of reviewing this volume, Darwin and Lamarck, and Samuel Butler's treatment of evolution in however. I have had to revise some notions that I have entertained in:. Erewhon. It was, so he told me then, a subject that had excited him recent yea-s. Although there will be plenty of criticism i,n• the pages since he was a young man. that follow, this review is on the whole favourable. Popper's public discussion of biology is, however, comparatively recent. I believe that I can date it quite exactly to the afternoon of II Tuesday, November I 5, 1960. On that day the members of Popper's The philosophical and scientific questions and ideas raised in the seminar had assembled as usual around the long table in the old Schilpp volu nc for K an Popper bear on virtually all aspects of seminar room on the fourth floor of the old building of the London philosophy. The work is long, published in two volumes, in a School of Economics. When Popper appeared, he announced that he compass of I 323 pages. There arc thirty-three contributions on would abandon the usual format and would read a new paper of his wide range of topics by distinguished philosophers, public servants, own, That new paper, which spoke of "three worlds", of biology, and scientists. These include four British knights, a British lord, andt, and gave qualified support to Ilegel's theory of objective mind, took two Nobel laureates. Popper's own contributions constitute a su' the members of the seminar off guard. The discussion that followed stantial work in themselves; an intellectual autohiogra phy of 18O was more bewildered than heated; and Popper, usually one of the pages, and a reply to his critics running to 236 pages. most persistent of men, did not pursue the matter that term. No One could not do justice to this work in the space of member of the seminar, perhaps not even Popper, could have review. I have therefore with the encouragement of the editorè óf.. predicted that they had just heard the first note in a new develop- this journal undertaken a survey of Popper's work based on this, ment in his thought. volume. It will be published in five installments as follows: Present that afternoon were some of the closest members of I. The present essay deals with biology, evolution theor Popper's circle, including J.W.N. Watkins, JO. Wisdom, lmre Laka- evolutionary epistemology, the "Three Worlds''. tos, l.C. Jarvie, and myself. About a dozen students, including Alan Il. The second essay treats consciousness and the mind-body Musgrave, also attended. Ernest Geilner was no longer attending the problem, and the relation of these to the problems of determinisqi seminars; Sir Ernst Gombnch did not attend that meeting, and Joseph Agassi had a few months earlier departed for hong Kong. and indcterminism, physics, and probability t heony, ':i Ill. The third essay discusses rationality, criticism, and togic.,. Al. Sabra was still in Egypt; and Paul Feyerabend had been in IV. The fount Ii insta llm cut reviews Popper's co ntrihut wns to,, Berkeley since 1958. Not one of these associates, neither those who historical and soial philosophy and to intellectual lnistor were present nor those who were absent, had more than marginal V. The fifth and final installment treats Popper's background interest in biology. None of them would - had be been asked to give and intellectual development, his intellectual biography, and the riSb i a sketch of Popper's ideas and of his development - have mentioned of the Popper School; and it gives a summary evaluation of PopperS biology. And Popper himself, in the autobiographical sketches that contributions to philosophy. ,t ,• he had written for British Philosophy in Mid-Century, for The Postscript (still tinpublished), and elsewhere, made virtually no Anthony Quinton, in an interesting study of Popper's work, mention of biologyór its philosophy. has co Iii men ted that alt hoti gh Popper is ''the in ost important and 465 464 . / Ii .--..-, '...'-,'." LsAi( I.L , Iii CIUrICAL ST(JJM1S . ', .'; ' • I V 1 ç' ', .c-.....c• '* i ,'i "çC '-.4 In the years since then Popper has developed his ideas on the1, Both scientific kno'ledge, as recorded In 'theoriai'and theyti4 "three' worlds't and on biology, drawing in large strokes, and has biologically based cognitive structures of anIrhals canbë 'studied' :i: therebygeneralised and unified his philosophy, Although the funda- otcjectivçly as products. Both are objective structutes the firt beinj.",', i" mental components of his framework have not been much affected 'in exosoniatic development the second being endosotnild develop. P by this development, their presentation has been transformed; they ments. Both, according to Popper, are produced bythe sam';". -:.;- are explained and in minor ways corrected. I'rior to 1960 the Dirwinrin mechanism the highest creati e thought, just like animal development of Popper's thought could have been presented, how- adaptation, is the product of blind variation and ever unjustly, in an incremental way: his new foundations for logic - trial and error. The same process governsbotI blologlcat 'en-.';,:'' and his work in indelerminism in physics, his contributions to ence and the growth of knowledge in sçIencécbrnIng tadItionl": probability theory, all could be presented as elaborations of his early philosophical approaches to knowledge which 'focus on the suh-" work in induction and deniarcat ion. The new work in philosophy of jective interiot experience of the cognizer or "knowing subject" --' .biology, however, is not simply incremental: it unifies the whole. his beliefs and perceptions - Popper turns to the tbjective products The manner in which I'opper's new biological concerns serve to of the cognitive process, viewing cognitive structures and scientific integrate his thought can he seen in the new formulation of the chief'c theories alike as knowledge achievements.3 -' I proble ;n of episteniology which he introduces In his "Replies to My Just as, for the earlier Popper, the phIlosopher compared I ('ri tics'' I/ic maui task of (lie tlieorp of knowledge,'' hew rites (p.
Recommended publications
  • Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age.
  • Hacker's Complaint

    Hacker's Complaint

    VOL. NO. JULY CONTENTS ARTICLES Intentionalism and the Imaginability of the Inverted Spectrum Eric Marcus Metaphysical Arguments against Ordinary Objects Amie L. Thomasson Kant’s Transcendental Strategy John J. Callanan True Emotions Mikko Salmela Wittgenstein and Strong Mathematical Verificationism Cyrus Panjvani DISCUSSIONS Hacker’s Complaint Scott Soames Are There Non-Existent Intentionalia? Alberto Voltolini CRITICAL STUDY The Sort of Creature You Are Anselm W. Müller BOOK REVIEWS BLACKWELL PUBLISHING FOR THE SCOTS PHILOSOPHICAL CLUB AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. , No. July ISSN – DISCUSSIONS HACKER’S COMPLAINT B S S My goal in writing ‘Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century’ was to identify and explain the most important achievements of analytic philosophy which every student of the subject should be aware of, as well as those of its failures from which we have the most to learn. I attempted to do this by constructing a history that was itself a piece of analytic philosophy in its emphasis on analysis, reconstruction and criticism of arguments. In rebutting Hacker’s critique of it, I explain how my goal shaped my selection of topics, with special reference to the ordinary language period. I correct his misrepresentations of my treatment of the philosophers of this period, I demonstrate his failure to grasp, or understand the significance of, the Kripkean necessary a posteriori, and I reveal the misconceptions in his criticism of my interpretation of the ‘Tractatus’. I I am grateful to the Editors for inviting me to reply to P.M.S. Hacker’s review in this journal of my Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century.1 I begin with his complaint about the materials I chose to discuss: In its selection of materials it is unrepresentative: significant figures are omitted and pivotal works are not discussed ..
  • 5025 Ethical Pers. 01/4/02

    5025 Ethical Pers. 01/4/02

    Ethics and The Discernment of Spirits1 Garrett Barden William Desmond is a deeply rooted thinker The second reason is that sometimes one dis- whose work exhibits not only the universal covers that the fulfilment of what one has taken to rhetoric of analysis but also, and quite openly, the be one’s present desire leaves one dissatisfied; local and personal rhetoric of living. I have tried leaves one with the sense of unexpected incom- here to honour that complex rhetorical intertwin- pleteness; with a dimly felt hunger. But here, too, ing by a reflection on St. Ignatius of Loyola whose in the sense of inadequacy, desire remains as a cri- influence on me has been and remains, I think, terion; one has not yet found one’s heart’s desire. greater and more obscure than I know. What There is a temptation entirely to repudiate Ignatius calls the discernment of spirits I call here desire as a criterion of the good in favour of some the discrimination of desires. naturally known explicit set of propositions that My theme is that the great philosophers of the would define the good and from which other spec- moral life have, in very different ways, spoken of ifications of the good could be deduced. This is the same experience, the experience that led Kant the temptation of Pascal’s esprit de géométrie that to write in one breath of “the starry heavens above would discover ethical axioms whence ethical the- and the moral law within”2 and which for Ignatius orems could be deduced.
  • Similarity and Imagination

    Similarity and Imagination

    Tales of Similarity and Imagination Tom Schoonen Tales of Similarity and Imagination — A modest epistemology of possibility Tom Schoonen This page is intentionally left blank Tales of Similarity and Imagination — A modest epistemology of possibility ILLC Dissertation Series DS-2020-15 For further information about ILLC-publications, please contact Institute for Logic, Language and Computation Universiteit van Amsterdam Science Park 107 1098 XG Amsterdam phone: +31-20-525 6051 e-mail: [email protected] homepage: http://www.illc.uva.nl/ Copyright © 2020 by Tom Schoonen Cover design by Thom van Gessel & Tom Schoonen Printed and bound by Ipskamp Printing. ISBN: 978-94-6421-096-5 Tales of Similarity and Imagination — A modest epistemology of possibility Academisch Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. ir. K.I.J. Maex ten overstaan van een door het College voor Promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel op vrijdag 4 december 2020, te 16.00 uur door Tom Schoonen geboren te Haarlem Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. Dr. F. Berto Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. Dr. A. Betti Universiteit van Amsterdam Copromotor: Dr. P.M. Hawke Universiteit van Amsterdam Overige leden: Dr. L. Incurvati Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. Dr. G. Priest City University of New York Dr. K. Schulz Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. Dr. S.J.L. Smets Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. Dr. B. Vetter Freie Universität Berlin Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen This dissertation is part of a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement ERC CoG No.
  • INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS

    INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS

    INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS Volume 173 Robert Ginsberg Founding Editor Peter A. Redpath Executive Editor Associate Editors G. John M. Abbarno Matti Häyry Mary-Rose Barral Steven V. Hicks Gerhold K. Becker Richard T. Hull Raymond Angelo Belliotti Mark Letteri Kenneth A. Bryson Vincent L. Luizzi C. Stephen Byrum Alan Milchman H. G. Callaway George David Miller Robert A. Delfino Alan Rosenberg Rem B. Edwards Arleen L. F. Salles Andrew Fitz-Gibbon John R. Shook Francesc Forn i Argimon Eddy Souffrant William Gay Tuija Takala Dane R. Gordon Anne Waters J. Everet Green John R. Welch Heta Aleksandra Gylling Thomas F. Woods a volume in Cognitive Science CS Francesc Forn i Argimon, Editor INTENTIONALITY Past and Future Edited by Gábor Forrai and George Kampis Amsterdam - New York, NY 2005 Cover Design: Studio Pollmann The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO 9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents - Requirements for permanence”. ISBN: 90-420-1817-8 ©Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam - New York, NY 2005 Printed in the Netherlands CONTENTS Preface vii List of Abbreviations ix ONE The Necessity and Nature of Mental Content 1 LAIRD ADDIS TWO Reading Brentano on the Intentionality of the Mental 15 PHILIP J. BARTOK THREE Emotions, Moods, and Intentionality 25 WILLIAM FISH FOUR Lockean Ideas as Intentional Contents 37 GÁBOR FORRAI FIVE Normativity and Mental Content 51 JUSSI HAUKIOJA SIX The Ontological and Intentional Status of Fregean Senses: An Early Account of External Content 63 GREG JESSON
  • The Philosophical Context of Identity by Amy A. Oliver English Abstract

    The Philosophical Context of Identity by Amy A. Oliver English Abstract

    Seeking Latina Origins: The Philosophical Context of Identity by Amy Oliver Seeking Latina Origins: The Philosophical Context of Identity by Amy A. Oliver English Abstract This article considers three Latin American figures, Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, Leopoldo Zea, and La Malinche, and demonstrates ways in which the roles they have played can illuminate how intellectual independence, the quest for identity, and racial mixing have contributed to the formation of Latina identities and the development of Latina voices. Resumen en español Este ensayo analiza a tres figuras de América Latina, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Leopoldo Zea y La Malinche, y demuestra la manera en que sus trabajos pueden iluminar cómo la independencia intelectual, la búsqueda de la identidad y el mestizaje han contribuído a la formación de la identidad latina y las voces latinas. Resumo em português Este ensaio analisa três figuras da América Latina, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Leopoldo Zea e La Malinche pra demonstrar a maneira em que os papéis deles iluminem como a independência intelectual, a pesquisa da identidade e a miscigenação contribuem á formação da identidade latina e as vozes latinas. __________________________________________________________ Inter-American Journal of Philosophy !!!!! ! May, 2014 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 5, Issue 1, Page 63 Seeking Latina Origins: The Philosophical Context of Identity by Amy Oliver This article revisits three foundational Latin American figures, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Leopoldo Zea, and La Malinche, and demonstrates ways in which the roles they have played can illuminate how intellectual independence, the quest for identity, and racial mixing have contributed to the formation of Latina identities and the development of Latina voices.[1] Sor Juana, a gender rebel, uses silence masterfully, and then her voice emerges to question authority and model resistance against entrenched male authority while arguing the case for a woman’s right to an intellectual life.
  • Inner Experience While Reading Fiction: a Descriptive Experience Sampling Exploration Vincent Peter Brouwers University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Brouwer3@Unlv.Nevada.Edu

    Inner Experience While Reading Fiction: a Descriptive Experience Sampling Exploration Vincent Peter Brouwers University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected]

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones December 2015 Inner Experience while Reading Fiction: A Descriptive Experience Sampling Exploration Vincent Peter Brouwers University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Psychology Commons Repository Citation Brouwers, Vincent Peter, "Inner Experience while Reading Fiction: A Descriptive Experience Sampling Exploration" (2015). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2521. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2521 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Scholarship@UNLV. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INNER EXPERIENCE WHILE READING FICTION: A DESCRIPTIVE EXPERIENCE SAMPLING EXPLORATION by Vincent Peter Brouwers Bachelor of Arts in Psychology Loyola Marymount University 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts – Psychology Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2015 Thesis Approval The Graduate College The University of Nevada, Las Vegas June 8, 2015 This thesis prepared by Vincent P. Brouwers entitled Inner Experience while Reading Fiction: An Inner Experience Sampling Exploration is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts – Psychology Department of Psychology Russell T. Hurlburt, Ph.D. Kathryn Hausbeck Korgan, Ph.D. Examination Committee Chair Graduate College Interim Dean Christopher L. Heavey, Ph.D. Examination Committee Member Stephen D. Benning, Ph.D. Examination Committee Member Douglas A.
  • Daniel Whistler

    Daniel Whistler

    Speculations III [email protected] www.speculations-journal.org Editors Michael Austin Paul J. Ennis Fabio Gironi Thomas Gokey Robert Jackson isbn 978-0988234017 Front Cover: unanswered: witness Grace Lutheran Church Parking Lot, Linwell Road, St. Catharines, June 2003 by P. Elaine Sharpe Back Cover: unanswered: witness Flight Simulation Training Center, Opa Locka Airport, FLA, December 2002 by P. Elaine Sharpe Courtesy of P. Elaine Sharpe, used with permission. pesharpe.com The focal distance in these photograph is at the normal range of human conversational distance, 3 meters. Although the image may appear to be out of focus, it is focused on the absence of human presence. Designed by Thomas Gokey v 1.0 punctum books ✴ brooklyn, ny 2012 Editorial Introduction 5 Articles Re-asking the Question of the Gendered Subject after 7 Non-Philosophy Benjamin Norris Thing Called Love 43 That Old, Substantive, Relation Beatrice Marovich The Other Face of God 69 Lacan, Theological Structure, and the Accursed Remainder Levi R. Bryant Improper Names for God 99 Religious Language and the “Spinoza-Effect” Daniel Whistler Namelessness and the Speculative Turn 135 A Response to Whistler Daniel Colucciello Barber Diagonals 150 Truth-Procedures in Derrida and Badiou Christopher Norris Synchronicity and Correlationism 189 Carl Jung as Speculative Realist Michael Haworth Translations Über stellvertretende Verursachung 210 Graham Harman Speculative Realism 241 After finitude, and beyond? Louis Morelle Position Papers and Interview 273 Outward Bound
  • What Does It Mean to Say That Logic Is Formal?

    What Does It Mean to Say That Logic Is Formal?

    WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT LOGIC IS FORMAL? by John Gordon MacFarlane A.B., Philosophy, Harvard College, 1991 M.A., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 1994 M.A., Classics, University of Pittsburgh, 1997 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2000 i Robert Brandom, Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy (Director) Nuel Belnap, Alan Ross Anderson Distinguished Professor of Philosophy (Second Reader) Joseph Camp, Professor of Philosophy Danielle Macbeth, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Haverford College (Outside Reader) Kenneth Manders, Associate Professor of Philosophy Gerald Massey, Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy ii WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT LOGIC IS FORMAL? John Gordon MacFarlane, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2000 Much philosophy of logic is shaped, explicitly or implicitly, by the thought that logic is distinctively formal and abstracts from material content. The distinction between formal and material does not appear to coincide with the more familiar contrasts between a pri- ori and empirical, necessary and contingent, analytic and synthetic—indeed, it is often invoked to explain these. Nor, it turns out, can it be explained by appeal to schematic inference patterns, syntactic rules, or grammar. What does it mean, then, to say that logic is distinctively formal? Three things: logic is said to be formal (or “topic-neutral”) (1) in the sense that it provides constitutive norms for thought as such, (2) in the sense that it is indifferent to the particular identities of objects, and (3) in the sense that it abstracts entirely from the semantic content of thought.
  • Thecooperunion for the Advancement of Science and Art

    Thecooperunion for the Advancement of Science and Art

    THECOOPERUNION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE AND ART COURSE CATALOG 2014|15 COOPER.EDU TABLE OF CONTENTS 2014–15 Academic Calendar 2 Mission Statement 3 A Brief History 4 General Information 5 Programs 5 Facilities and Resources 6 Student Life 7 Admission Process 9 Tuition, Fees and Expenses 16 Financial Aid 17 Scholarships, Fellowships, Awards and Prizes 20 General Regulations 22 Code of Conduct 30 The Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture 34 Mission Statement 34 Bachelor of Architecture Professional Degree Curriculum 35 Academic Standards and Regulations 37 Master of Architecture II Post-Professional Degree Curriculum 40 Academic Integrity 42 Facilities and Resources 43 Courses 45 Faculty 47 The School of Art 49 Mission Statement 49 Bachelor of Fine Arts Curriculum 50 Academic Standards and Regulations 53 Facilities and Resources 56 Courses 59 Faculty 66 The Albert Nerken School of Engineering 68 Mission Statement 68 Overview 69 Facilities and Research 70 Bachelor of Engineering Curriculum 72 Master of Engineering Curriculum and Requirements 75 Honors and Special Programs 76 Academic Standards and Regulations 78 Grades of Record 79 Departments and Programs 81 Courses 94 Faculty and Advisory Council 113 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 116 Aims and Objectives 116 Academic Regulations 116 Courses 118 Faculty 128 Trustees, Officers, Deans, President’s Council, Administration, Emeriti, Alumni Association 129 Policies 131 Index 150 2 THE COOPER UNION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE AND ART 2014–15 ACADEMIC CALENDAR January 5 Monday AND HOLIDAY SCHEDULE Administrative offices reopen All grades are due in the Office of Admissions and Records before Noon August 26 Tuesday Move-in day for Residence Hall January 19 Monday Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday (staff holiday) August 26–September 1 Tuesday–Monday New student orientation January 20 Tuesday Spring semester classes begin.
  • Paradoxes of Intensionality Version Of: March 1, 2007 Dustin Tucker and Richmond H

    Paradoxes of Intensionality Version Of: March 1, 2007 Dustin Tucker and Richmond H

    Paradoxes of Intensionality Version of: March 1, 2007 Dustin Tucker and Richmond H. Thomason Philosophy Department, University of Michigan Abstract We identify a class of paradoxes that are neither set-theoretical or semantical, but that seem to depend on intensionality. In particular, these paradoxes arise out of plausible properties of propositional attitudes and their objects. We try to explain why logicians have neglected these paradoxes, and to show that, like the Russell Paradox and the direct discourse Liar Paradox, these intensional paradoxes are recalcitrant and challenge logical analysis. Indeed, when we take these paradoxes seriously, we may need to rethink the commonly accepted methods for dealing with the logical paradoxes. 1. Introduction Contemporary work on the paradoxes of logic and set theory is framed by ideas that go back to the 1920s and 1930s. In 1925, Frank Ramsey divided the paradoxes into those (like the Russell Paradox) that arise within mathematics, and those (like the Liar Paradox) that do not. Having made his division of the paradoxes, Ramsey took the Liar and related paradoxes to be extralogical, involving an “empirical” linguistic element. But later, in work published in 1936, Alfred Tarski showed that the Liar Paradox does arise even in rigorously presented semantic theories of formalized languages, making a compelling case that the enterprise of producing these theories belongs to logic. At the same time, he demonstrated how the para- dox could be avoided by relativizing truth to a language and invoking a linguistic hierarchy in which no language could serve as its own semantic metalanguage. These ideas were congenial to the spirit of the times.
  • Special Issue Logical Foundations of Strategic Reasoning

    Special Issue Logical Foundations of Strategic Reasoning

    Volume 5 Volume ISSN PRINT 2055-3706 ISSN ONLINE 2055-3714 Issue 5 August 2018 Journal of Contents Articles The logical foundations of strategic reasoning: inconsistency-management as a test case for logic John Woods 945 Applied Logics Reasoning with diagrams and images: observation and imagination as rules of inference The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications John Sowa 987 Volume 5 Issue 5 August 2018 Playing with anticipation as abduction: strategic reasoning in an eco-cognitive perspective Lorenzo Magnani 1061 Abductive cognition: affordance, curation, and chance Akinori Abe 1093 Conjectures and abductive reasoning in games Special Issue Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen 1121 Enthymematic interaction in Baduk Logical Foundations Woosuk Park 1145 The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Ap Journal of Applied Logics When is a strategy in games? of Strategic Reasoning Woosuk Park 1169 What strategicians might learn from the common law: Guest Editor implicit and tacit understandings of the unwritten John Woods 1205 Woosuk Park John Woods plications Sponsored by Published by Available online at www.collegepublications.co.uk/journals/ifcolog/ Free open access Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications Volume 5, Number 5 August 2018 Disclaimer Statements of fact and opinion in the articles in Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications (JAL-FLAP) are those of the respective authors and contributors and not of the JAL-FLAP. Neither College Publications nor the JAL-FLAP make any representation, express or implied, in respect of the accuracy of the material in this journal and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made.