DOCSLIB.ORG

Conway-Suchman Conversation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conway-Suchman Conversation Conway Suchman Conversation Conway-Suchman conversation Lynn Conway, Lucy Suchman Published on: Mar 05, 2021 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Conway Suchman Conversation Conway-Suchman conversation Preface by Lucy Suchman, 28 February 2021 In 1980, at Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), we entered into a rather extraordinary conversation. Computer architect and electrical engineer Lynn was then head of the LSI (Large-Scale Integration) Systems area at PARC, while I was a recently arrived Research Intern at PARC and PhD student in Anthropology at the University of California at Berkeley, in the very early stages of formulating plans for my doctoral thesis. Lynn was emerging from a period of intensive activity focused on the ‘multi-university, multi-project chip-design demonstration’ (MPC79), an initiative involving the creation of a new pedagogy and associated design and manufacturing process for the production of very large-scale integrated circuits (VLSI). At Lynn’s suggestion, we began an exchange born out of her desire to think anthropologically about what she had just experienced, and mine to deepen my understanding of her sociotechnical imaginary and practice. With Lynn’s endorsement, I recorded and transcribed our conversations, aided by an Alto computer and the text editor Bravo, both recently developed and in everyday use at PARC. The resulting text, which I printed out to share with Lynn and archived for herself in a 3-ring binder, was around 55 pages. We lost touch over the years following our respective departures from PARC until, in 2020, another PhD student, Philipp Sander, contacted Lynn to interview her. Engaged in doctoral work in Media and Cultural Studies at Leuphana University in Germany, Philipp was interested in understanding the place of Lynn’s VLSI work in the history of the microchip, and in the course of their exchange she pointed him to me as someone else he might talk with. Philipp’s consequent email sent me down to my basement to retrieve the binder and re-read the transcript. More importantly, it reconnected me with Lynn, and our conversation resumed with as much enthusiasm as it had begun 40 years earlier. What follows is the original transcript of our conversations, preceded by a cover memo written at the time. Our conversations about that conversation continue (in part from comments on the transcript) as we, in Lynn’s words, grope our way into ever-clearer mutual understandings of the events surrounding that earlier encounter. As Lynn points out, rather than serving as any ‘real record’ of what we were actually thinking at the time, the transcript only just cracks open the door to shed light on what was going on in each of our worlds. For example, we've already noticed that rather profound social, political, and interpersonal forces were at play 2 Conway Suchman Conversation Conway-Suchman conversation that were not only not discussed but were quite carefully kept between the lines of our text.1 It is those threads of the subtext that we’re now most keen to recover, to trace their effects and their wider resonance with other (his)stories of technoscientific research and development. XEROX Palo Alto Research Center, Systems Science Laboratory April 1980 To: Conversations File From: Lucy Suchman Subject: Suchman-Conway Conversations Stored: (Suchman)ConFile.memo This file documents an ongoing project in ‘cross-cultural communication.’ It began with my interest in the sociological implications of Lynn Conway’s work in the field of VLSI. As an anthropologist, I shared Lynn's fascination with the issues of design, network collaboration and technical demystification raised by the MPC79 experience. Those issues were the focus of our first meeting, which we recorded and transcribed. We found that the transcript provided an interesting artifact. It had several properties. First, by externalizing Lynn’s knowledge it immediately became a document of MPC79 and could be read as history. It could also, therefore, be read as a text, with all of the opportunities for finding topics and developing lines of discussion that a text provides. And finally, it provided a record of our first attempt at a dialogue. More precisely, it suggested the terms for such a dialogue. We found that the issues of specialization developing out of the story of MPC79 had to do with just the work that we were ourselves engaged in, i.e., finding topics and concepts of mutual interest and usefulness across the boundaries of our respective fields. At the same time that the transcript talked about that project as a topic, it served as resource for carrying it out. Our subsequent meetings have taken a more free-running and conversational form. Each time, however, we’ve tried to maintain some continuity with the one before. In that effort the transcripts have been very useful. A recurring topic of our talks has been how to find a framework for communication across disciplines. The object is to find the level at which specialized knowledge from one field can be presented to a 3 Conway Suchman Conversation Conway-Suchman conversation novice from another so as to disclose its underlying simplicity, while not losing the depth and complexity that makes it genuinely special. These discussions are not intended to be tightly ordered. At times they may wander, loop, or become downright silly. With that caveat, we invite you to read them in the same spirit of relaxed exploration by which they were generated. The hope is that whatever your field, there will be resonance at some point along the way. c. Copyright 1980 by Lucy Suchman Conversation I (MPC79), March 12, 1980, Filed on Maxc<Suchman>Conl.press Conversation with Lynn Conway re MPC79 3/12/80 (S = Suchman, C = Conway) S: The things that have particularly interested me about it, other than just the sequence of events – there are two major topics that I think are really interesting. One of them is the whole issue of the “network adventure,” as you call it. That kind of open collaboration. C: Right. S: An open collaboration that’s facilitated by having that electronic medium to communicate with. And the second thing is the demystification of what was traditionally a very specialized field of endeavor. C: Okay. S: So maybe you could just go over the sequence of events, the way things happened. And then however those topics come into it – and whatever other topics you think are really important that those don’t include. C: And while we're doing that why don’t you try to keep me on track or point the thing off in directions as they seem interesting. S: Sure. C: The interesting thing, I think, is that the two things – the use of the network and the network adventure aspect has been coupled in a close way with the demystification. I’ll try to see if I can indicate how that happens. 4 Conway Suchman Conversation Conway-Suchman conversation A lot of this is intuitive. I think that what happens is that, how would I say it, the people involved in this have been – and when I say “this” I really mean the creation of the early course material, the work on the book,2 the simplification and streamlining of techniques of implementing designs once you have them, and then lately, this new system for collecting many designs and so forth, and sort of spreading that culture – I would say there’s one quality about the people involved. And that is that – I perceive this – that myself, Carver Mead, Doug Fairbairn, Dick Lyon, a bunch of Carver’s students and some of the others we’ve interacted with since very early, have all been sort of intellectual entrepreneurs. They’re interested in just making things happen, and having fun, and basically are a bunch of people that found themselves suddenly with a set of possible things to get going, and access to this network. And then, you know, just started operating. Operators might be a good word. Operators in the financial sense or business sense. Okay? S: Right. C: Which meant they would take risks, and just try out crazy things. Okay. But then also I think that some of us had an intuitive notion about how to use the networks to do some things. Being able to envision some mechanisms you might be able to get your hands on that would make things happen faster and go certain ways. S: Does that, do you think, come from experience? Just having used the network for a long period of time for other – C: Yes, yes. That’s a very good point. What I think happened was, a sort of critical point was, something triggered our starting to operate in the Arpanet just like we operate here on the second floor [of PARC].3 So it was probably that prior to all this most of us had been embedded here on the second floor in a variety of projects not really related to this, doing our own thing here, and had learned a style of joining, or forming and leading quick tasks pulled together where a bunch of people will go off and build a program, write a paper, do a thing in the network here on the second floor. When this thing happened there was another counter pressure. There wasn’t much interest in this on the second floor. I hadn’t thought about that, that’s sort of old history. In fact the effort was sort of scoffed at as naive. It’s interesting. So then there was this reaching out looking for collaborators outside.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unsung Innovators: Lynn Conway and Carver Mead They Literally Wrote the Book on Chip Design
    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9046420/Unsung_innovators_Lynn_Conway_and_Carver_Mead Unsung innovators: Lynn Conway and Carver Mead They literally wrote the book on chip design By Gina Smith December 3, 2007 12:00 PM ET Computerworld - There is an analogy Lynn Conway brings up when trying to explain what is now known as the "Mead & Conway Revolution" in chip design history. Before the Web, the Internet had been chugging along for years. But it took the World Wide Web, and its systems and standards, to help the Internet burst into our collective consciousness. "What we had took off in that modern sort of way," says Conway today. Before Lynn Conway and Carver Mead's work on chip design, the field was progressing, albeit slowly. "By the mid-1970s, digital system designers eager to create higher-performance devices were frustrated by having to use off-the-shelf large-scale-integration logic," according to Electronic Design magazine, which inducted Mead and Conway into its Hall of Fame in 2002. The situation at the time stymied designers' efforts "to make chips sufficiently compact or cost- effective to turn their very large-scale visions into timely realities." But then Conway and Mead introduced their very large-scale integration (VLSI) methods for combining tens of thousands of transistor circuits on a single chip. And after Mead and Conway's 1980 textbook Introduction to VLSI Design -- and its subsequent storm through the nation's universities -- engineers outside the big semiconductor companies could pump out bigger and better digital chip designs, and do it faster than ever. Their textbook became the bible of chip designers for decades, selling over 70,000 copies.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Computing
    History of Computing CSE P590A (UW) PP190/290-3 (UCB) CSE 290 291 (D00) Women in Computing Katherine Deibel University of Washington [email protected] 1 An Amazing Photo Philadelphia Inquirer, "Your Neighbors" article, 8/13/1957 2 Diversity Crisis in Computer Science Percentage of CS/IS Bachelor Degrees Awarded to Women National Center for Education Statistics, 2001 3 Goals of this talk ! Highlight the many accomplishments made by women in the computing field ! Learn their stories, both good and bad 4 Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace ! Translated and extended Menabrea’s article on Babbage’s Analytical Engine ! Predicted computers could be used for music and graphics ! Wrote the first algorithm— how to compute Bernoulli numbers ! Developed notions of looping and subroutines 5 Garbage In, Garbage Out The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. — Ada Lovelace, Note G 6 On her genius and insight If you are as fastidious about the acts of your friendship as you are about those of your pen, I much fear I shall equally lose your friendship and your Notes. I am very reluctant to return your admirable & philosophic 'Note A.' Pray do not alter it… All this was impossible for you to know by intuition and the more I read your notes the more surprised I am at them and regret not having earlier explored so rich a vein of the noblest metal.
    [Show full text]
  • Lynn Conway Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Emerita University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2110 [email protected]
    IBM-ACS: Reminiscences and Lessons Learned From a 1960’s Supercomputer Project * Lynn Conway Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Emerita University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2110 [email protected] Abstract. This paper contains reminiscences of my work as a young engineer at IBM- Advanced Computing Systems. I met my colleague Brian Randell during a particularly exciting time there – a time that shaped our later careers in very interesting ways. This paper reflects on those long-ago experiences and the many lessons learned back then. I’m hoping that other ACS veterans will share their memories with us too, and that together we can build ever-clearer images of those heady days. Keywords: IBM, Advanced Computing Systems, supercomputer, computer architecture, system design, project dynamics, design process design, multi-level simulation, superscalar, instruction level parallelism, multiple out-of-order dynamic instruction scheduling, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, VLSI design. 1 Introduction I was hired by IBM Research right out of graduate school, and soon joined what would become the IBM Advanced Computing Systems project just as it was forming in 1965. In these reflections, I’d like to share glimpses of that amazing project from my perspective as a young impressionable engineer at the time. It was a golden era in computer research, a time when fundamental breakthroughs were being made across a wide front. The well-distilled and highly codified results of that and subsequent work, as contained in today’s modern textbooks, give no clue as to how they came to be. Lost in those texts is all the excitement, the challenge, the confusion, the camaraderie, the chaos and the fun – the feeling of what it was really like to be there – at that frontier, at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov 9, 2016: Professor Lynn Conway's
    Professor Lynn Conway Introduction: Nov 9, 2016 1 Mary Sanseverino Nov 9, 2016: Professor Lynn Conway’s Citation for the Degree Doctor of Engineering, Honoris Causa, University of Victoria. Citation prepared and read by Mary Sanseverino, Deputy Orator, and Teaching Professor Emerita, Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria. Madam Chancellor, I have the privilege of speaking about the extraordinary accomplishments of Lynn Conway: brilliant computer scientist and engineer, innovative educator, and advocate for transgender rights. She is a technological revolutionary whose discoveries opened the floodgates of creativity for countless engineers, computer scientists, and entrepreneurs. Professor Conway’s ideas are all around us today – in computers, tablets, smartphones, GPS, self-driving cars … indeed, in almost all modern technology. In 1963 Lynn Conway completed graduate work in electrical engineering and computer science at Columbia University. She was quickly recruited by IBM Research where she invented a ground- breaking technique which dramatically increased computer Professor Lynn Conway Introduction: Nov 9, 2016 2 Mary Sanseverino performance by arranging and executing instructions far more efficiently, and still, 50 years on, a standard technique in today’s computers. Sadly, IBM fired her in 1968 as she underwent gender transition. She had to rebuild her career in “stealth” with a new name and identity. Starting all over again, Lynn joined Memorex in 1969 and moved to Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Centre in ‘73. Silicon Valley in the 70’s: What an exhilarating time and place this must have been – technological innovations coming thick and fast – and Lynn Conway was in the heart of it all! It was becoming clear that methods of digital circuit design current at the time could not handle the complexity that new technology would demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with James Mitchell
    Interview with James Mitchell Interviewed by: David C. Brock Recorded February 19, 2019 Santa Barbara, CA CHM Reference number: X8963.2019 © 2019 Computer History Museum Interview with James Mitchell Brock: Yeah. So, yeah, maybe we can talk about your transition from Carnegie Mellon to PARC and how that opportunity came about, and what your thinking was about joining the new lab. Mitchell: I basically finished my PhD and left in July of 1970. I had missed graduation that year, so my diploma says 1971. But, in fact, I'd been out working for a year by then, and at PARC, you know, there were a number of other grad students I knew, and two of them had gone to work for a start-up in Berkeley that-- there were two Berkeley computer science departments, and the engineering one left to form this company called Berkeley Computer Corporation with Mel Pirtle running it and Butler Lampson kind of a chief technical officer and Chuck Thacker and so on, and anyway the people that I-- the two other grad students that had gone already that I knew, when I was going out, I was starting to go around and interview in early 1970 because I knew I was close to being finished, and it was in those days because there were so few people who had PhDs in computer science and every university was trying to build a department, and industrial research places like Bell Labs were trying to hire people and so on, anywhere you went with a new PhD you got an offer.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Optical Mouse: Early Biomimetic Embedded Vision
    The Optical Mouse: Early Biomimetic Embedded Vision Richard F. Lyon Abstract The 1980 Xerox optical mouse invention, and subsequent product, was a successful deployment of embedded vision, as well as of the Mead–Conway VLSI design methodology that we developed at Xerox PARC in the late 1970s. The de- sign incorporated an interpretation of visual lateral inhibition, essentially mimicking biology to achieve a wide dynamic range, or light-level-independent operation. Con- ceived in the context of a research group developing VLSI design methodologies, the optical mouse chip represented an approach to self-timed semi-digital design, with the analog image-sensing nodes connecting directly to otherwise digital logic using a switch-network methodology. Using only a few hundred gates and pass tran- sistors in 5-micron nMOS technology, the optical mouse chip tracked the motion of light dots in its field of view, and reported motion with a pair of 2-bit Gray codes for x and y relative position—just like the mechanical mice of the time. Besides the chip, the only other electronic components in the mouse were the LED illuminators. Fig. 1 The Xerox optical mouse chip in its injection- molded dual-inline package (DIP) of clear plastic, with pins stuck into a conductive packaging foam. The bond wires connecting the chip’s pads to the lead frame are (barely) visible. Richard F. Lyon Google Inc., Mountain View CA, e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 Richard F. Lyon Fig. 2 The Winter 1982 Xe- rox World internal magazine cover featuring the Electron- ics Division and their 3-button mechanical and optical mouse developments, among other electronic developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology and Courage
    Technology and Courage Ivan Sutherland Perspectives 96-1 In an Essay Series Published by SunLabs April 1996 _____________________________________________________________________________ © Copyright 1996 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Perspectives, a new and parallel series to the Sun Microsystems Laboratories Technical Report Series, is published by Sun Microsystems Laboratories, a division of Sun Microsystems, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. Unlimited copying without fee is permitted provided that the copies are not made nor distributed for direct commercial advantage, and credit to the source is given. Otherwise, no part of this work covered by copyright hereon may be reproduced in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or storage in an information retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. TRADEMARKS Sun, Sun Microsystems, and the Sun logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. All SPARC trademarks, including the SCD Compliant Logo, are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. SPARCstation, SPARCserver, SPARCengine, SPARCworks, and SPARCompiler are licensed exclusively to Sun Microsystems, Inc. All other product names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respec- tive owners. For information regarding the SunLabs Perspectives Series, contact Jeanie Treichel, Editor-in-Chief <[email protected]>. For distribution issues, contact Amy Tashbook Hall, Assistant Editor <[email protected]>. _____________________________________________________________________________ Editor’s Notes About the series— The Perspectives series is a collection of essays written by individuals from Sun Microsystems Laboratories. These essays express ideas and opinions held by the authors on subjects of general rather than technical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender: Is It Me? (PLZ HELP)
    Transgender: is it Me? (PLZ HELP) MIDORI TROJANOWSKI WRITER’S COMMENT: I wrote this paper for Dr. Wrye Sententia’s UWP 104F: Writing in the Health Professions class fall quarter of my senior year. I was very excited when we were given an opportunity to choose our own healthcare-related topic. Discrimination of any sort has always caught my attention, but I ended up writing about discrimination and the hardships of being a transgender-identifying person, especially the extent to which it can afect a person’s health. For transgender individuals, discrimination can be damaging both emotionally and physically and some doctors even refuse to treat them because of their identity. I thought it would be both fun and cultur- ally relevant to write in the format of a semi-anonymous online blog or chat room. In a society that still fnds ways to discriminate against people for who they are, I believe that this online format would be the frst place someone today would seek information about what it is to be transgender. I would especially like to thank my long-time acquaintance Levi Maxwell, a gender variant person who has worked on behalf of transgender communities and who enlightened me about what it can mean to be transgender in today’s world. INSTRUCTOR’S COMMENT: Midori’s approach in this piece of writing is courageous. In the course for which it was written (UWP 104F: Writing in the Health Professions), students typically write in styles that are more comfortably “academic.” One might wonder, how then, could Midori’s approach possibly ‘ft’? And yet, it does ft, beauti- fully.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2013 Virtual Reality Career Award
    The 2013 Virtual Reality Career Award Henry Fuchs The 2013 Virtual Reality Career Award goes to Henry Fuchs, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for his lifetime contributions to research and practice in virtual environments, telepresence, and medical applications. Since the 1970s, Henry Fuchs has made pioneer contributions to many of the technolo- gies needed to enable virtual and augmented reality: automatic construction of 3D models and scenes, fast rendering algorithms (BSP Trees), graphics hardware (Pixel-Planes), large- area tracking systems (HiBall), optical and video see-through head-mounted displays. Many of these advances were inspired by demanding applications such as augmenting visualization for surgical assistance (by merging real and virtual objects) and teleimmersion for remote medical Henry Fuchs consultation. He continues to innovate within a multi-national telepresence research center The University of North with sites at ETH Zurich, NTU Singapore, and UNC Chapel Hill. The IEEE VGTC is pleased Carolina at Chapel Hill to award Henry Fuchs the 2013 Virtual Reality Career Award. Award Recipient 2013 Biography Fuchs is the Federico Gil Distinguished Professor of These VR applications also inspired concurrent work Computer Science and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical in wide-area tracking systems, such as the inside-out optical Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel tracking dissertation research of student and colleague Gary Hill. Born in 1948 in Tokaj, Hungary, he escaped with his Bishop, and (a decade later) Bishop’s student and colleague family in wake of the 1956 Hungarian revolution, emigrat- Greg Welch. The commercialized HiBall™ wide-area tracker ing to the USA in 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERCOMPUTERS Palo Alto's Lynn Conway Has Been Entrusted with Mobilizing American Computer Scientists to Build a New Generation of Machines That Can Think
    o s 5i Ia Lynn Conway stands behind her workat XeroxPalo AltoResearch Center. Alan Bell (center) and Gaetano Borriello areplaying a game called "Truckin"' which tests artificial intelligenceapplications. "Truckin"' was designed by researchers working with Conway—Mark Stefik and DannyBobrow. Creating a new generation of SUPERCOMPUTERS Palo Alto's Lynn Conway has been entrusted with mobilizing American computer scientists to build a new generation of machines that can think. She's out to explore the New Frontier of Supercomputing — before the Japanese stake territorial claims. Michael Doyle Conwaydescribesherselfas afan Research Projects Agency (DARPA). excitement about her work PA, Conwaywill scout the frontier ofsuper- Lynnof the "laid-back Palo Alto "Let's gomake it happen," Conway said in computer research and develop- computing. Othjer countries will provide lifestyle." Sitting in her well-tended in a tone reminiscent of an inspirational Conway'sment is as tangible in her writings as competition, particularly Japan, which has backyard with her Siamese cats Samantha coachbefore the big game. Conway willlead in her speech. In a lecture givenat Caltech embarkedon its own, highlypublicized ad- and Rapunzel, the 42-year-old computer a project with major defense and commer- and later published by Xerox,Conway said vanced supercomputer project, scientist talksof sailing, bike rides and hik- rial implications. that the development of computers and The DARPA computer project for which ing in FoothillsPark. Working at the Defense Department,
    [Show full text]
  • AIE Volume 6 Issue 1 Cover and Front Matter
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING Volume 6 Number 1 Editor Clive L. Dym ACADEMIC PRESS Harcoun Brace Jovanovich, Publishers London San Diego New York Boston Sydney Tokyo Toronto ISSN 0890-0604 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 24 Sep 2021 at 13:07:05, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. (Al EDAM) Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing EDITOR CLIVE L. DYM Department of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711, U.S.A. RESEARCH BRIEFS EDITOR BOOK REVIEWS EDITOR MANJULA WALDRON DAVID C. BROWN Department of Engineering Graphics, Department of Computer Science, The Ohio State University, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A. Worcester, MA 01609, USA EDITORIAL BOARD Paul R. Cohen, Department of Computer and Information John McDermott, Digital Equipment Corporation, Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, Marlborough, MA 01752, U.S.A. U.S.A. Sanjay Mittal, Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Xerox Palo Lynn Conway. College of Engineering, University of Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, U.S.A. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. Kiyoshi Niwa, Advanced Research Laboratory, Hitachi Johan de Kleer, Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Xerox Palo Ltd., Tokyo 185, Japan Alto Research Center, Palo Alto. CA 94304, U.S.A. Panos Papalambros, Department of Mechanical Engineering, John R. Dixon, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A. H. Van Dyke Parunak, Industrial Technology Institute, Ann S. J. Fenves, Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie- Arbor, MI 48106, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]