Lockheed Fire Post Fire Risk Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lockheed Fire Post Fire Risk Assessment Lockheed Fire Post Fire Risk Assessment San Mateo-Santa Cruz Unit California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection September 30, 2009 Aerial photo of Mill Creek drainage August 25, 2009 Table of Contents Page # Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Incident History 1 Watersheds 3 Field Observations 3 Burn Severity Characteristics 8 Fire Behavior 8 Historic Fire Return Intervals 9 Seasonal Context 10 Geology 12 General Observations 13 County Road 13 Downstream Impacts 13 Description of Geologic Units 16 Soils 17 Hydrophobic Soil Conditions 19 Soil Erosion Potential 20 Ecological Impacts 21 Redwood Forest 25 Mixed Conifer 25 Chaparral 26 Coastal Scrub 27 Grassland 27 Specific/Isolated Forest Stands 28 Invasive Species 29 General Recommendations 31 Recommendations to Mitigate Potential Soil Erosion and the Impacts 33 of Storm Water Runoff/Flooding Specific Observations 37 References 51 Post Fire Restoration Do’s and Don’ts 54 Firescaping and Erosion Control with Native Plants 59 Sample No Trespassing Sign 64 Maps Page # Watershed Map 6 Burn Severity Map 7 Fire History Map 11 Geology Map 15 Soil Map 18 Vegetation Type Map 24 Risk Maps Archibald Creek 40 Bettencourt Creek 41 Big Creek 42 Boyer Creek 43 Little Creek 44 Lower Scotts Creek 45 Mill Creek 46 Molino Creek 47 Queseria Creek 48 Upper Scotts Creek 49 Winter Creek 50 Tables and Charts Page # Table 1. Percent of Watersheds Burned 3 Table 2. Ranked Watersheds 5 Table 3. Fire Behavior 9 Table 4. Burn Severity by Vegetation Type 22 Chart 1. Lockheed Fire Severity by Vegetation Type 23 Chart 2. Vegetation Types by Burn Severity 23 Table 5. Generalized model of post-fire vegetation recovery for 27 chaparral Burn Site Evaluation Summary 61 Burn Site Evaluation Forms 66 Executive Summary The Lockheed Fire started on August 12, 2009. During the emergency incident CAL FIRE officials determined that very high burn impacts occurred that could potentially impact lives and property. CAL FIRE assembled a multi-disciplinary team to do a rapid assessment of the fire area and identify critical risk areas. CAL FIRE also determined that local experts have a lot of knowledge from past fires and resource assessments that have been done in Santa Cruz County. This report attempts to bring together information and knowledge related to the potential post fire risks. Based on the assessments made, eleven recommendations were formulated. The recommendations are listed in order of most immediately critical. The number one recommendation and highest priority is for the community accessed from Swanton Road to participate in Emergency Evacuation Planning. There is a significant increase in the potential for flooding, debris torrents, and debris flows in the watersheds affected by the fire. The number two recommendation is for the areas identified in this report as high risk areas to have site specific analysis conducted that prescribe practices to minimize risks. Introduction and Incident History The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) assembled a team to conduct a post burn assessment as part of its Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program authorized by Public Resources Code Section 4675 and 4676. The intent of activities conducted under this authority is to: 1) conserve water and soil, and 2) prevent destructive floods. This report is an assessment of the fire area that ranks high risk areas to life and property and recommends treatments to minimize risk. This report is also a practical guide for property owners regarding recommended actions after a fire. The report contains summary information on watershed data regarding vegetation types, geology, soils and burn severity by watershed. This information can be used as a basis to conduct more detailed investigations and research within the burn area. The data for the maps were a cooperative project between Cal Poly Swanton Pacific Ranch, Big Creek Lumber Company, CAL FIRE and the U.S. Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center. The Lockheed Incident (CA-CZU-007246) began on August 12, 2009. The incident was declared contained on August 23, 2009. The total acreage burned was 7,819 acres. The total suppression cost was over 30 million dollars. The fire burned across multiple private ownerships as well as a portion of California State Park property, all within State Responsibility Lands (SRA). The major landowners within the fire were Lockheed Martin Corporation, Big Creek Lumber, Cal Poly Swanton Pacific Ranch and CEMEX. The majority of the fire was located in the Scotts Creek Watershed, which supports anadromous fish bearing streams, with federally endangered coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and federally threatened steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Vegetation types in the burned area include redwood forest, mixed conifer forest, chaparral, coastal scrub and grassland. The landscape is mountainous with slope Page 1 steepness commonly exceeding 50% (slopes range from nearly zero percent to over 90%). Crystalline igneous and sedimentary rocks that are moderately to pervasively fractured dominate the bedrock in the area. Burn severity across the entire burn area was estimated to be 14% very high, 37% high, 43% moderate, and 6% low. On August 31, 2009, a team was assembled to develop a rapid assessment of the burned area watersheds. The objectives of the team were as follows: 1. Estimate the acreage and percent of area burned within each watershed affected by the fire and fire suppression activities. 2. Estimate the burn severity and create a burn severity map using the Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC) Map provided by the USDA Forest Service, post burn air photos and ground truthing. 3. Field check areas for hydrophobic soil conditions. 4. Estimate percent of area burned and severity by vegetation type. 5. Evaluate soil erosion potential. 6. Evaluate condition of roads, dams, bridges and culverts that may contribute to flood events (including Swanton Road). 7. Identify problem/risk areas. 8. Develop recommendations to mitigate potential high priority hazards. 9. Develop recommendations to assist restoration efforts. The following technical specialists comprised the assessment team: Angela Bernheisel, CAL FIRE, Forester Richard Casale, NRCS1, Erosion and Sediment Control Specialist Nadia Hamey, Big Creek Lumber, Forester Grey Hayes, PhD, Ecological Consultant Michael Huyette, CGS2, Engineering Geologist Rich Sampson, CAL FIRE, Division Chief Additional experts who worked with the team to produce GIS maps were: John Martinez, CAL FIRE, Pre-Fire Planner Drew Perkins, Cal Poly Swanton Pacific Ranch, GIS Specialist Russ White, Cal Poly Swanton Pacific Ranch, GIS Specialist 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2 California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey Page 2 Watersheds The main drainages impacted by the fire are listed below (Table 1). All are tributaries to Scott Creek except Davenport Landing, Molino Creek, Picnic Creek and San Vicente Creek. Table 1. Percent of Watersheds Burned Watershed Total Area Area Burned Area Burned (ac) (ac) (%) Archibald Creek 421 369 87.7 Bettencourt Subwatershed 3 495 494 99.8 Big Creek 5856 1447 24.7 Boyer Subwatershed 4 1354 432 31.9 Davenport Landing 2009 7 0.4 Little Creek 1306 1200 91.9 Lower Scotts Creek 1503 150 10.0 Mill Creek 2404 1626 67.6 Molino Creek 1025 797 77.8 Picnic Subwatershed 5 177 142 80.2 Queseria Creek 399 360 90.3 San Vicente Creek 6961 121 1.7 Upper Scotts Creek 5207 583 11.2 Winter Creek 116 94 81.0 Entire Scott Creek Watershed 19,001 6755 36% Field Observations The assessment team made field observations within and immediately adjacent to the Lockheed Fire. Field observations were completed from August 31st to September 2nd. Active suppression operations were still in progress. The team’s focus was to assess high risk areas for flooding and land sliding and to identify potential Emergency Watershed Protection Program projects. Tests for water repellency and hydrophobic 6 soil conditions were conducted at the field sites using a procedure suggested by the NRCS. Where homes or property were found to be at risk, a detailed form developed by the CGS was completed, including a detailed site description and/or photographs of the area. The team utilized incident maps and other maps developed for the assessment. Lidar imagery of the Scotts Creek Watershed was provided by Cal Poly and Big Creek Lumber which was extremely valuable for the geological and hydrological assessments. The team 3 Bettenccourt Creek is separated from the Upper Scott Creek Watershed 4 Boyer Creek is separated from the Big Creek Watershed 5 Picnic Creek is separated from the San Vicente Watershed 6 Hydrophobic conditions result from a waxy substance that is released by plant material during a hot fire. This material penetrates into the soil as a gas and cools, forming a waxy coating around the soil particles (DeBano et al. 1998). Water repellency was evaluated by measuring the time it takes for water droplets to penetrate the soil both on and below the soil surface. Page 3 also conducted informal interviews with residents of the fire area who provided information about past flood events and watershed conditions. The Lockheed Fire Damage Assessment Report (2009) documented all structures observed within the burn and surrounding area where structures were defended. Road and foot inspections were conducted in the areas with high value from August 31 to September 2, 2009. Houses, in-stream structures such as dams, and road-related features, such as culverts and bridges, were surveyed at major drainage crossings. The portions of the burn area that drain into the San Vicente Creek and Davenport Landing watersheds were not evaluated due to their small relative percentage of burn area (1.8% and 0.4%, respectively) and the lack of known nearby values at risk. There is a major water intake for the town of Davenport above the confluence of Picnic Creek and San Vicente Creek.
Recommended publications
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022
    CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2017–2022 Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. ~ Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (§206.401) Adopted by the City Council xxxx xx, 2017 Table of Contents APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................... II MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ II TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ III HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... IV PART 1 — INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 1 Chief’S Message
    Report to the Community Fall 2016 1 Chief’s Message As Fire Chief of the Albany Fire Department, it is my honor to present the Albany Fire Department’s Report to the Community. In our response to emergencies and our provision of health, safety and emergency services to the community, the department continues to exemplify the excellence and professionalism Albany has come to expect. Although you probably know us as the “fire department,” this by no means reflects the many ways our department serves the community every day. The Albany Fire Department not only responds to fires, but also provides the necessary training to respond to a multitude of emergencies. We also provide emergency medical services including transport, hazardous material response, and technical rescues for vehicle accidents and water rescue. Thanks in great part to the success of our Fire Prevention program, emergency medical calls now account for a majority of our workload. As we move forward into 2017 and beyond, we continue to emphasize training and best practices in everything we do to keep Albany safe. I would like to thank the Mayor, the City Council and the City Manager Mission for their support throughout some tough years, and for their support and vision for AFD’s continued growth and change. The Albany Fire Department enhances the quality of life and the environment by providing fire prevention and suppression, The future of the Albany Fire Department looks tremendous. It is my emergency medical services, public education and emergency honor to be a part of this department and its long, rich history and preparedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Damage and Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire
    Damage and Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire Steve R. Auten1 and Nadia Hamey1 Abstract On August 12, 2009, the Lockheed Fire ignited the west slope of the Santa Cruz Mountains burning approximately 7,819 acres. A mixture of vegetation types were in the path of the fire, including approximately 2,420 acres of redwood forest and 1,951 acres of mixed conifer forest types representative of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Foresters and land managers were left with tough decisions on how to treat tree damage and mortality compounded by the Pine Mountain Fire which occurred in the same area in 1948. Big Creek Lumber Company (BCL), Cal Poly’s Swanton Pacific Ranch (SPR) and other professionals familiar with this region of redwood teamed up to develop a method for evaluating damage and mortality. Qualitative criteria for evaluating stand damage focused on historic defect, cambial death, root damage, and associated fire intensity. Quantitative damage criteria was used to contrive three mortality assessment tables, broken up by diameter class (1 through 8, 9 through 16, 17+), for all tree species and tested against 83, 1/5th acre fixed plots from SPR’s Continuous Forest Inventory. Since the initial mortality evaluation using the new tables in fall of 2009, each of the 2877 trees have been re-evaluated in spring 2010 and spring 2011. Accuracy against the initial evaluation is 89.3 percent. Key words: damage, hardwood, mortality, redwood Introduction What should be harvested to encourage regeneration of selectively-managed forestland in the Southern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest District following wildfire? What determines tree mortality for the purpose of amending the sustainability analysis (SA) of a Non-industrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) following wildfire? Charged with managing and maintaining the health and vigor of the forest ecosystem, foresters and land managers need an accurate way of field-evaluating damage and mortality in conifers and hardwoods immediately following wildfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts and Presenter Biographical Information Oral Presentations
    ABSTRACTS AND PRESENTER BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ORAL PRESENTATIONS Abstracts for oral presentations and biographical information for presenters are listed alphabetically below by presenting author’s last name. Abstracts and biographical information appear unmodified, as submitted by the corresponding authors. Day, time, and room number of presentation are also provided. Abatzoglou, John John Abatzoglou, Assistant Professor of Geography, University of Idaho. Research interests span the weather-climate continuum and both basic and applied scientific questions on past, present and future climate dynamics as well as their influence on wildfire, ecology and agriculture and is a key player in the development of integrated climate scenarios for the Pacific Northwest, US. Oral presentation, Wednesday, 2:30 PM, B114 Will climate change increase the occurrence of megafires in the western United States? The largest wildfires in the western United States account for a substantial portion of annual area burned and are associated with numerous direct and indirect geophysical impacts in addition to commandeering suppression resources and national attention. While substantial prior work has been devoted to understand the influence of climate, and weather on annual area burned, there has been limited effort to identify factors that enable and drive the very largest wildfires, or megafires. We hypothesize that antecedent climate and shorter-term biophysically relevant meteorological variables play an essen- tial role in favoring or deterring historical megafire occurrence identified using the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Atlas from 1984-2010. Antecedent climatic factors such as drought and winter and spring temperature were found to vary markedly across geographic areas, whereas regional commonality of prolonged extremely low fuel moisture and high fire danger prior to and immediately following megafire discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Mortality and Response in a Redwood/ Douglas-Fir Forest
    POST-FIRE MORTALITY AND RESPONSE IN A REDWOOD/ DOUGLAS-FIR FOREST, SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Forestry Sciences by Garren McKendree Andrews December 2012 i © 2012 Garren McKendree Andrews ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: POST-FIRE MORTALITY AND RESPONSE IN A REDWOOD/ DOUGLAS-FIR FOREST, SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA AUTHOR: Garren M. Andrews DATE SUBMITTED: December 2012 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Dr. Christopher A. Dicus, Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Brian Dietterick, Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Mark Horney, Professor iii Abstract Post-fire Mortality and Response in a redwood/ Douglas-fir forest, Santa Cruz Mountains, California Garren Andrews We investigated how fire severity impacts the survival and response (sprouting/seeding) of multiple species in the Santa Cruz Mountains of coastal California, including coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens ), Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ), tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus ), and Pacific madrone( Arbutus menziesii ). During August 2009 the Lockheed Fire burned nearly 3,160ha of mixed-conifer stands with variable severity. Data from 37 Continuous Forest Inventory (CFI) plots were collected immediately before and for 2 successive years following the 2009 Lockheed Fire. This research entails three objectives. First, we quantified post-fire mortality of trees that vary in species, size, and fire severity. Second, data was quantified for post-fire response (sprouting, seeding) of those three tree species in areas of varying fire severity. Third, we developed logistic regression models that predict post-fire mortality and response for each of the three species.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Disaster Code Declaration
    State/Tribal Number Date Government Incident Description Declaration Type 1259 11/6/1998 Florida Tropical Storm Mitch Major Disaster Declaration 1258 11/5/1998 Kansas Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding and 1257 10/21/1998 Texas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1256 10/19/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1255 10/16/1998 Washington Landslide In The City Of Kelso Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding, And 1254 10/14/1998 Kansas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1253 10/14/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1252 10/5/1998 Washington Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1251 10/1/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1250 9/30/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1249 9/28/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 3133 9/28/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3132 9/28/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3131 9/25/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 2248 9/25/1998 Washington Columbia County Fire Management Assistance Declaration 1247 9/24/1998 Puerto Rico Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1248 9/24/1998 Virgin Islands Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1245 9/23/1998 Texas Tropical Storm Frances Major Disaster Declaration Tropical Storm Frances and 1246 9/23/1998 Louisiana Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration Hurricane Georges (Direct 3129 9/21/1998 Virgin Islands Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2018–2023
    CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update 2018–2023 Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. ~ Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (§206.401) Adopted by the City Council xxxx xx, 201x Table of Contents APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................................... II MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ II TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................ III HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... IV PART 1 — INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION .................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 015-2018 SHMP FINAL Appendices
    APPENDICES – 2018 STATE HAZARD MITIGATION TEAM ROSTER OF AGENCIES AND STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS AECOM National Governments Alameda County Office of Emergency Services Alpine County Operational Area Inland Region IV Air Resources Control Board (ARB) Amador County Operational Area Inland Region IV American Planning Association California Chapter American Red Cross (Sacramento Chapter) Association of Bay Area Governments Association of Contingency Planners Association of Environmental Professionals Burbank Fire Corps Business and Industry Council for Emergency Planning & Preparedness (BICEPP) Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency Business Executives for National Security (BENS) Business Recovery Managers Association Butte County Operational Area Inland Region III California Adaptation Forum California Association of Councils of Governments Cahuilla Band of Indians California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection Calaveras Council of Governments California Coastal Commission California Conservation Corps California Community Colleges California Department of Community Services and Development California Department of Conservation California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation California Department of Education California Department of Food and Agriculture California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) California Department of General Services California Department of Housing and Community Development California Department of Insurance California Department of Public Health California Department of Public
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 • Construction Methods............................................................................................13 • Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • SCCO Master Plan
    Santa Cruz County Master Fire Plan 2012/2015 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................................2 FINANCIAL ..................................................................................................................................................................6 MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................................................8 VOLUNTEERS..........................................................................................................................................................10 JURISDICTION .........................................................................................................................................................13 FACILITIES................................................................................................................................................................14 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ...............................................................................................................15 FIRE PREVENTION.................................................................................................................................................17 TRAINING..................................................................................................................................................................19 DISPATCH SERVICES............................................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]