The Five Therapeutic Relationships
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Five Therapeutic Relationships ARTEMIS S. ANTONIOU Private Practice, Athens, Greece TANIA G. BLOM Private Practice, Bristol, UK Abstract: Founded on research evidence, Clarkson declares that it is not any specific psychological counseling paradigm itself that is the quintessence of therapeutic effective- ness but the tangible therapeutic relationship between the therapist and client. Clarkson states that there are five types of relationships potentially present in the therapeutic encounter. These are (a) the working alliance, (b) the transference/countertransference relationship, (c) the developmentally needed/reparative relationship, (d) the person- to-person relationship, and (e) the transpersonal relationship. This case study presents the theoretical framework of the five relationships; it demonstrates how this was utilized in the clinical context with a male client referred to as Harry and what were for him the implications of the therapeutic relationship assisting him to overcome low self- esteem, childhood sexual abuse, and depression. Keywords: relational model; therapeutic relationship; working alliance; transferential/ countertransferential relationship; reparative/developmentally needed relationship; person-to-person relationship; transpersonal relationship 1 THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH BASIS Ever more research is discovering that exceeding every other aspect, it is the rela- tionship between therapist and client that ascertains the significance and the efficacy of the therapy (Bergin & Lambert, 1978; Hill, 1989; O’Malley, Suh, & Strupp, 1983). For Goldfried (1980), relationship is the keystone of all psychotherapy. Kahn’s (1991) teacher stated, “The relationship is the therapy.” The relationship between client and therapist was found to be one of the most prominent dynamics in the therapeutic out- come by Frank (1979) and Hynan (1981). The formulation of this case study is based on Clarkson’s (2003) five-relationships framework for psychotherapy integration. Based on this framework, the case descrip- tion will focus mainly on the therapeutic relationship between client and therapist. Different theoretical orientations are utilized in an integrative way, aiming to estab- lish, develop, and serve the unique therapeutic relationship with this particular client. CLINICAL CASE STUDIES, Vol. 5 No. 5, October 2006 437-451 DOI: 10.1177/1534650106292668 © 2006 Sage Publications 437 438 CLINICAL CASE STUDIES / October 2006 2 CASE PRESENTATION The present case study describes the client’s therapeutic journey within the con- text of Clarkson’s five-relational model, utilized for eight sessions. The biographical details of the client have been disguised for ethical reasons. To make the description of this therapeutic journey easier for the reader, the therapeutic process of the first three (1 to 3) sessions is described separately, and then the other five (4 to 8) are presented as a solid continuum of the therapy where the client worked through his real issues. 3 PRESENTING COMPLAINTS The family physicians based at this practice refer clients for counseling via referral letters. The counselors then contact the clients, by phone or letter, to arrange an appointment. This client, Harry (pseudonym), was referred for coun- seling by the family physician, whose assessment letter reported that Harry was “feeling rather low and stressed recently” and that he was “getting easily irritable with his daughter, which was making him feel very guilty.” The family physician noted that he thought that “the client was not clinically depressed but that he would welcome the opportunity to talk through the difficulties in his life.” 4 HISTORY Harry is a 33-year-old male from the Indian subcontinent. He married 10 years ago and has a daughter, aged just younger than 2 years. He is educated to the grad- uate level and works in the information technology industry. His wife is a health pro- fessional. He came to the United Kingdom as a teenager to live with his siblings, who had moved to this country while he was still a child. Harry lost his mother when he was 15 years old. Harry said his mother had physically abused him many times dur- ing his childhood. This was something that his father had never done. He continued bedwetting until he was 8 years old. He claimed that he had a better relationship with his grandparents than with his parents. 5 ASSESSMENT Harry presented as well groomed in all sessions. He usually was dressed in casual clothes (e.g., T-shirts, button-up monochrome shirts, pastel-colored pullovers and jeans, or casual trousers). In almost all sessions, Harry had his job’s pass card and a group of keys hung from his neck or the waistband of his trousers. In therapy, Harry was very articulate, and he seemed to be psychologically educated, expressing and describing his thoughts, emotions, and events in a clear, rich, and direct way. During the first session, Harry wept a lot, and emotionally he seemed to be enormously Antoniou, Blom / THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIPS 439 vulnerable. Harry was given space to express his emotions, and I acknowledged his distress. When Harry’s distress calmed down, I moved to the initial contract with him. During the initial sessions (1 to 3), Harry seemed willing to work, yet he was quite unstable as to the therapeutic work (e.g., cancelled appointments, was not punctual). In the following sessions (4 to 8), Harry really engaged in therapy, and he revealed the real issues that were troubling him. Because these were the issues that he now wanted to work out in therapy, there was an alteration in the contract (i.e., the empha- sis was given to those latter issues). Harry left therapy having released a significant amount of his repressed feelings of fears and anxiety and having improved his self-image and his self-confidence. These changes and their consequences were reflected in his real life, and Harry stated he was willing to continue working on his self-development and growth. 6 CASE CONCEPTUALIZATION The content of this case study is based on Clarkson’s five-relational model as a theoretical and clinical framework for psychotherapy integration. Based on research evidence, Clarkson (2003) declares that it is not any particular psychological coun- seling paradigm itself that is the essence of therapeutic effectiveness but the actual therapeutic relationship between the therapist and the client. Clarkson (2003) states that there are five types of relationships all potentially present in the therapeutic process. These are THE WORKING ALLIANCE This is the constituent of the client–therapist relationship that enables both the client and the therapist to work together even when one or both experience strong desires to the contrary. In the working alliance, the client’s reasonable side...aligns with the counsel- lor’s working side (which is his or her more reasonable side). This permits the client to experience negative feelings toward the counselor without disrupting the work....It is the working alliance also, and perhaps more essentially, that creates the sense that the participants of the counseling relationship are joined together in a shared enterprise, each making his or her contribution to the work. (Gelso & Carter, 1985, p. 163) THE TRANSFERENCE/COUNTERTRANSFERENCE RELATIONSHIP This is the anticipated relationship in which the experience of unconscious wishes and fears onto or into the therapeutic partnership take place. This can take any of four forms, any of which could act in a facilitative or destructive way in the therapeutic process: 440 CLINICAL CASE STUDIES / October 2006 1. Proactive transference—what the client brings to the relationship or the client’s projections of past experiences onto the therapist. 2. Proactive countertransference—what the therapist brings to the relationship or the therapist’s transference toward the client. 3. Reactive transference (or countertransference)—what the client reacts to because of what the therapist brings in the relationship. 4. Reactive countertransference—what the therapist reacts to in the client (Clarkson, 2003). THE DEVELOPMENTALLY NEEDED OR REPARATIVE RELATIONSHIP The developmentally needed or reparative relationship is an intentional provi- sion by the psychotherapist of a corrective, reparative, or replenishing relation- ship or action where the original parenting was deficient, abusive, or overpro- tective. (Clarkson, 2003, p. 113) THE PERSON-TO-PERSON RELATIONSHIP “The person-to-person relationship is the core or real—as opposed to object relationship” (Clarkson, 2003, p. 152). Garfield and Affleck (1961), Sloane, Staples, Cristol, Yorkston, and Whipple (1975), Ford (1978), Adelstein, Gelso, Haws, Reed, and Spiegel (1983), and Gelso, Mills, and Spiegel (1983) have all shown that it is sig- nificant to the client that there be a real relationship from within which the psy- chotherapist can use whatever theory or technique he or she advocates. In contacting you, I wager my independent existence, but only through the con- tact function can the realization of identities fully develop. Contact is not just togetherness or joining. It can only happen between two separate beings, always requiring independence and always risking capture in the union. At the point of union, one’s fullest sense of this person is swept along into a new creation. I am no longer only me, but me and thee make we. Although me and thee become we in name only, through its naming, we gamble with the dis- solution of either me or thee. Unless I am experienced in knowing full contact,