<<

The Emerging Crisis of Aged : Could Housing Solutions Be Funded by Avoidance of Excess Shelter, Hospital, and Nursing Home Costs?

Dennis Culhane, PhD, Dan Treglia, PhD Thomas Byrne, PhD Stephen Metraux, PhD Randall Kuhn, PhD Kelly Doran, MD MHS Eileen Johns MPA, Maryanne Schretzman, DSW Acknowledgements Funders New York State Health Foundation Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Aileen Getty Foundation Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation

Data Providers NYC Department of Social Services NYS Department of Health Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Mission Analytics Homeless Services Authority County of Los Angeles Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development MassHealth Department of Neighborhood Development

2 Agenda Projections of the Aging Homeless Population for Presentation Understanding Healthcare Service Usage of Older Homeless Adults

Identifying Subgroups by Shelter & Healthcare Service Use

Identifying Potential Cost Offsets

Considering Stakeholders & Possible Next Steps

3 Homelessness, A Birth Cohort Phenomenon Single Adult Male Shelter Users,

Sheltered Homeless % Single Adult Males Aged 46-54 12

Population 10 1990 1 in 8 in 1990 2000 1 in 5 in 2000

8 2010 1 in 3 in 2010 Homeless

6 Male Male

4 Adult Adult

2 Single Single

0

of of % %

4 Forecasting Change in 65+ Homeless Population

3.0

2017 to

2.5 Relative Relative

2.0 Growth Growth 1.5

Population Population 1.0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Los Angeles Boston

5 NYC Age 50+ Shelter population forecast

50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70+

25,000 Actual Forecast

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0

17

08 12 04 06 10 14 20 22 24 26 28 30

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

2016 2018

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

6 NYC Age 65+ Shelter population forecast

65-69 70-74 75-79 80+

8,000 Actual Forecast 7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3000

2,000

1,000

0

28

08 04 06 10 12 14 16 17 18 20 24

22

30

26

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0

0

2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2

2 2

7 Change in Shelter Population for 5-Year Birth Cohorts: New York City, 2005 - 2030

6,000

Shelter 5,000 in

4,000 adults adults

of of 3,000

2,000 Number Number 1,000

0 1945-49 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

8 Aging Homelessness Trends Across U.S

9 Examining Shelter, Healthcare, and Nursing Home Use & Costs of Older Homeless Adults

Data Boston Sources Shelter: City of Boston HMIS Health care: MassHealth Medicaid Claims

Los Angeles Shelter: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority & Point-in-Time Count Health care: LA Enterprise Linkage Project (Departments of Public Health, Mental Health, & Health Services), CMS (through Mission Analytics); California Office of Statewide Healthcare Planning & Development

New York City Shelter: NYC Department of Social Services Health care: NYS Department of Health SPARCS Database, CMS (through Mission Analytics)

10 Average Annual Per Person Costs by Age: New York City

$30,000 $28,457 $27,314 $25,159 $25,000 $24,455

$20,000 Nursing Home $15,000 Inpatient Care ED Visit $10,000 Shelter

$5,000

$0 55-59 60-64 65-69 70+

11 Nursing Home Use by Age: LA County

20 18

Homes 16 14

12 Nursing

10 in in 8

Days Days 6 of of

# # 4 2 0 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 Age

12 Projecting Total Costs through 2030: New York City

$500

$450

$ $400 of $350

millions millions $300

$250 Year, Year,

Per Per $200

$150 Costs Costs $100

$50

$0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Shelter Healthcare

13 Segmenting into Subgroups Cluster Analysis: A tool for grouping observations based on to Assess Potential Housing similarities and dissimilarities

& Service Needs Clusters were created based on a small set of variables, and validity was assessed through other variables of service use and medical acuity

14 Cluster 4

Results High 2.6%

Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Moderate

84.6% 11.4% 1.4%

Need Analysis

Low Medical

Low Moderate High Very High

Shelter Use Subgroup Subgroup

Gagne Inpatient Shelter Days Comorbidity Hospital Days Cluster Description Cluster Share 2009 - 2015 Index 2011 - 2015 1 Moderate shelter use, Moderate medical need 11,354 (84.6%) 270 2.2 16 2 High shelter use, Moderate medical need 1,536 (11.4%) 1,191 3.1 20 3 Very high shelter use, Moderate medical need 193 (1.4%) 2,201 1.9 14 4 Low shelter use, High medical need 344 (2.6%) 56 32.5 253 15 Use

Nursing Health Total Shelter Inpatient ED Home Shelter Services Services Days Days Visits Days Cost Cost Cost Cluster 1 44 3 1 9 $5,167 $13,369 $18,536 Cluster 2 196 4 2 6 $23,018 $15,870 $38,888

Healthcare Cluster 3 329 3 1 3 $38,638 $10,281 $48,919 & &

Cluster 4 9 51 10 32 $1,075 $175,437 $176,494 Shelter Shelter

4

Annualized Annualized 1 2 3

Need Medical

Shelter Use Subgroups: Subgroups:

16 Envisioning a Continuum of Potential Interventions

17 4

1 2 3

Need Medical

Shelter Use

Subgroup 1: Expect homelessness to self-resolve for one-third of this cluster, as Progressive Engagement people move in with friends, family, partners, etc.

For the remaining 2/3, we assume an equal division of:

Rapid Rehousing: relocation and case management services and time-limited rental assistance

Shallow rental subsidies: for those needing ongoing modest rental assistance for shared living arrangements and minimal financial and social service support

Rental vouchers, like those available through HUD’s Section 202 program, in addition to light case management, and likely to be living alone

19 4

1 2 3

Need Medical

Shelter Use

Subgroups 2, 3, and 4: Long-term housing + supportive services for chronically homeless Permanent Supportive populations

Housing All three groups may need advanced case management and home care services that allow for aging in place

Subgroup 4 are likely candidates for palliative care and additional nursing home transition services

19 Estimating Costs for Each Intervention

Medical Need Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Shelter 4 4 3 2 1 Use Intervention Supports PSH PSH PSH Subsidy 1 + 2 Additional + Services 3 Cost Housing Annual $15,468 $15,468 $15,468 $4,795 $23,000 $11,500 $11,500 $1,650 Cost Service Annual $38,468 $26,968 $26,968 $6,444 Cost Annual Total 20 Estimating Service Cost Reductions

1.Aubry T, Goering P, Veldhuizen S, et al. A Multiple-City RCT of Housing First With Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Cana- dians With Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(3):275-281.

2.Basu A, Kee R, Buchanan D, Sadowski LS. Comparative cost analysis of housing and case management program for chronically ill homeless adults compared to usual care. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(1 Pt 2):523-543.

3.Rosenheck R, Kasprow W, Frisman L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Supported Housing for Homeless Persons With Mental Illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(9):940.

4.Stergiopoulos V, Hwang SW, Gozdzik A, et al. Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive casemanagement on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2015;313(9):905-915.

5.Byrne T, Smart G. Estimating Cost Reductions Associated with the Community Support Program for People Experiencing Chronic Homelessness. Boston, MA; 2017.

6.Culhane DP, Metraux S, Hadley T. Public Service Reductions Associated with Placement of Homeless Persons with Severe Mental Illness in . Hous Policy Debate. 2002;13(1):107-163.

7. Gilmer T, Manning W, Ettner S. A Cost Analysis of County’s REACH Program for Homeless Persons. Psychiatr Serv. 2009.

8.Larimer ME, Malone DK, Garner MD, et al. Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chron- ically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1349-1357. 9.Martinez TE, Burt MR. Impact of permanent supportive housing on the use of acute care health services by homeless adults.Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(7):992-999.

10.Seligson A, Levanon S, Lim T, et al. New York/New York III Supportive Housing Evaluation: Interm Utilization and Cost Analysis. New York; 2013.

11.Srebnik D, Connor T, Sylla L. A pilot study of the impact of housing first-supported housing for intensive users of medical hospitaliza- tion and sobering services. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(2):316-321.

12.Hunter SB, Harvey M, Briscombe B, Cefalu M. Evaluation of Housing for Health Permanent Supportive Housing Program. Santa Monica, CA; 2017.

13.Mares AS, Rosenheck RA. Twelve-Month Client Outcomes and Service Use in a Multisite Project for Chronically Homelessness Adults.

14.Thomas LM, Shears JK, Pate MC, Priester MA. Moore Place Permanent Supportive Housing Evaluation Study Final Report. Char- lotte, NC

Moving15. Wright IntoBJ, SupportiveVartanian Housing.KB, Li H Health-F, Royal Aff.N,2016;35(1):20Matson JK. Formerly-27. Homeless People Had Lower Overall Health Care Expenditures After 22 Service Cost Scenario 1 Reduction Scenarios More conservative Based on a pooled average of the percentage change in health care costs associated with housing placement that were observed in all studies that were reviewed. Studies were weighted so those with stronger methodological rigor had larger weights and greater impact on the pooled average.

Scenario 2 Less conservative Based on a pooled average of the percentage change in health care costs associated with housing placement that were observed in all studies that identified a significant reduction in health care costs.

22 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 A Range of Cost Category (More conservative) (Less conservative) Potential Service Cost Inpatient medical -18% -33% Reductions Emergency Department -6% -45% Outpatient medical -6% -45% Outpatient behavioral health 48% -29% Inpatient behavioral health -35% -56% Nursing home -42% -90% Shelter -71% -71%

23 Cost Reduction Possibilities by Age Group: LA County Average per Person Per Year

$12,000 $11,346 $10,668 $10,000 $9,834 $8,869

$8,000 $6,969 $6,978 $6,570 Age 55-59 $5,951 $6,000 $5,498 Age 60-64 Age 65-69 $4,000 Age 70+

$2,000

$- More Conservative Less Conservative Cost Reduction Scenarios Housing Intervention Cost

24 Cost Reduction Possibilities in NYC Average Per Person Per Year

$14,000 $13,215

$12,000 $11,033

$10,000 $9,171

$8,000

$6,000

$4,000

$2,000

$0 More Conservative Less Conservative Service Cost Reductions Housing Intervention Cost

25 Cost Reduction Possibilities in Boston Average Per Person Per Year

$10,000 $9,073 $9,052 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $4,946 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 More Conservative Less Conservative

Service Cost Reductions Housing Intervention Cost

26 Annualized Average Projected Costs & Potential Cost Reductions (in millions of $) Net Offsets (Service Cost Service Costs Interventio Average Service Cost Reductions - Return Per without an Intervention n Costs Reductions Intervention Costs) Dollar Spent

New York City $408 $157 $177 $20 1.13 Boston* $67 $39 $30 ($9) 0.77 LA County $621 $241 $274 $33 1.14

* Boston service costs and cost reductions exclude Medicare-reimbursed services. A forthcoming analysis estimating Medicare costs suggests that an intervention would be break-even or provide net savings

27 Could Housing Solutions be Funded by Resultant Service Cost Reductions? Yes

28 National Projections (with cautions)

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 55-64 65+

29 Key Stakeholders U.S. HUD & VA U.S. DHHS – CMS State Medicaid Regulatory Agencies Medicaid Managed Care Organizations Hospitals & nursing homes Homeless Service Providers (CoC’s) Housing Authorities

Local Area Agencies on Aging

30 • How to advance fund the housing “investment”?

Policy • MCOs as rapid rehousing funder under a critical time Considerations intervention model?

• Start now targeting hospital and ER discharges and nursing home diversion?

• Ramp up over time, starting with 65+ or 62+ to gain momentum and develop policies and procedures?

• Federal challenge grant program to states for pilots?

• Local/state pay for shallow subsidies as alternative to shelter, and sunsetting over time?

• Hospitals as key local leaders and conveners? Dissuade from “medical respite” push?

31