DOCSLIB.ORG

White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/585 ON THE COVER White Sands National Monument contains a portion of the largest gypsum dune field in the world. At sunset, the white, gypsum sand appears pink and purple as the sun sets over the San Andres Mountains. Photograph by Katie KellerLynn (Colorado State University). THIS PAGE Modern-day Lake Lucero is a large playa (ephemeral lake) that formed in the sediments of ancient Lake Otero. When the playa is covered with water, waves along the shoreline break down the sediments, making them available for eolian transport to the dune field. Photograph by Anna Szykiewicz (University of Texas at El Paso). White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/585 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 October 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. Printed copies of this report are produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is available from the Geologic Resources Inventory website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/inventory/ gre_publications.cfm) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). Please cite this publication as follows: KellerLynn, K. 2012. White Sands National Monument: geologic resources inventory report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/585. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. NPS 142/117235, October 2012 ii NPS Geologic Resources Division Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................. v List of Tables .................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... xi Credits ........................................................................................................................................................................ xi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Geologic Resources Inventory Program ......................................................................................................................... 1 Park and Regional Setting ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Geologic Issues .............................................................................................................. 7 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Surface Water ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 Erosion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Debris Flows and Rockfall........................................................................................................................................... 11 Paleontological Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Climate Change ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Monitoring Eolian Processes ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Infrastructure and Gypsum Sands ............................................................................................................................... 15 Tamarisk .................................................................................................................................................................... 16 White Sands Missile Range ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Mining and Energy Development ............................................................................................................................... 17 Seismic Activity .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Geologic Features and Processes ................................................................................ 19 Active Holocene Lake Basin ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Scour Platform ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Barchanoid Dune Field ............................................................................................................................................... 24 Marginal Parabolic Dunes........................................................................................................................................... 26 Interdunes ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Miscellaneous Geomorphic Features .......................................................................................................................... 27 Alluvial Deposits ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 Source of Gypsum Sand ............................................................................................................................................. 30 White Sands as an Analogue for Mars ........................................................................................................................ 31 Biological Soil Crusts .................................................................................................................................................. 32 Geothermal Features and Processes ........................................................................................................................... 33 Geologic History .......................................................................................................... 35 Precambrian Time: Ancient Mountain or Rift System .................................................................................................. 35 Ordovician and Cambrian Periods: Advancing Seas ..................................................................................................... 35 Silurian and Ordovician Periods: Marine Waters .......................................................................................................... 35 Mississippian and Devonian Periods: Changing Marine Conditions .............................................................................. 35 Pennsylvanian Period: Pangaea and the Ancestral Rocky Mountains ............................................................................ 38 Permian Period: Marine and Marginal Marine Sediments ............................................................................................ 38 Rocks from the Triassic and Jurassic Periods (or the lack thereof)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Possibilities of Using Silicate Rock Powder: an Overview
    GSF-101185; No of Pages 11 Geoscience Frontiers xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoscience Frontiers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf Research Paper Possibilities of using silicate rock powder: An overview Claudete Gindri Ramos a,⁎, James C. Hower c,d, Erika Blanco a, Marcos Leandro Silva Oliveira a,b, Suzi Huff Theodoro e a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58 #55-66, Barranquilla, Colombia b Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Arquitectura, Universidad de Lima, Avenida Javier Prado Este 4600, Santiago de Surco 1503, Peru c Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, USA d Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40511, USA e Postgraduate Program of Environment and Rural Development (PPG-MADER), Área Universitária, 01, Vila Nossa Senhora de Fátima – Campus UnB, Planaltina, DF, Brazil article info abstract Article history: This study evaluates the on use of crushed rocks (remineralizers) to increase soil fertility levels and which con- Received 15 October 2020 tributed to increase agricultural productivity, recovery of degraded areas, decontamination of water, and carbon Received in revised form 15 February 2021 sequestration. The use of these geological materials is part of the assumptions of rock technology and, indirectly, Accepted 28 February 2021 facilitates the achievement of sustainable development goals related to soil management, climate change, and the Available online xxxx preservation of water resources. Research over the past 50 years on silicate rocks focused on soil fertility manage- Handling editor: Lily Wang ment and agricultural productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of New Mexico As Understood in 1912: an Essay for the Centennial of New Mexico Statehood Part 2 Barry S
    Celebrating New Mexico's Centennial The geology of New Mexico as understood in 1912: an essay for the centennial of New Mexico statehood Part 2 Barry S. Kues, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, [email protected] Introduction he first part of this contribution, presented in the February Here I first discuss contemporary ideas on two fundamental areas 2012 issue of New Mexico Geology, laid the groundwork for an of geologic thought—the accurate dating of rocks and the move- exploration of what geologists knew or surmised about the ment of continents through time—that were at the beginning of Tgeology of New Mexico as the territory transitioned into statehood paradigm shifts around 1912. Then I explore research trends and in 1912. Part 1 included an overview of the demographic, economic, the developing state of knowledge in stratigraphy and paleontol- social, cultural, and technological attributes of New Mexico and its ogy, two disciplines of geology that were essential in understand- people a century ago, and a discussion of important individuals, ing New Mexico’s rock record (some 84% of New Mexico’s surface institutions, and areas and methods of research—the geologic envi- area is covered by sediments or sedimentary rocks) and which were ronment, so to speak—that existed in the new state at that time. advancing rapidly through the first decade of the 20th century. The geologic time scale and age of rocks The geologic time scale familiar to geologists working in New The USGS did not adopt the Paleocene as the earliest epoch of the Mexico in 1912 was not greatly different from that used by modern Cenozoic until 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous System in Central Sierra County, New Mexico
    The Cretaceous System in central Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas, New Mexico Museum of Natural History, Albuquerque, NM 87104, [email protected] W. John Nelson, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, [email protected] Karl Krainer, Institute of Geology, Innsbruck University, Innsbruck, A-6020 Austria, [email protected] Scott D. Elrick, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, [email protected] Abstract (part of the Dakota Formation, Campana (Fig. 1). This is the most extensive outcrop Member of the Tres Hermanos Formation, area of Cretaceous rocks in southern New Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks are Flying Eagle Canyon Formation, Ash Canyon Mexico, and the exposed Cretaceous sec- Formation, and the entire McRae Group). A exposed in central Sierra County, southern tion is very thick, at about 2.5 km. First comprehensive understanding of the Cretaceous New Mexico, in the Fra Cristobal Mountains, recognized in 1860, these Cretaceous Caballo Mountains and in the topographically strata in Sierra County allows a more detailed inter- pretation of local geologic events in the context strata have been the subject of diverse, but low Cutter sag between the two ranges. The ~2.5 generally restricted, studies for more than km thick Cretaceous section is assigned to the of broad, transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles of 150 years. (ascending order) Dakota Formation (locally deposition in the Western Interior Seaway, and includes the Oak Canyon [?] and Paguate also in terms of Laramide orogenic
    [Show full text]
  • (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous
    MicropaIeontoIogicaI Zonation (Foramin ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, Southeastern Alaska By BERNARD L. MAMET, SYLVIE PINARD, and AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2031 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Text and illustrations edited by Mary Lou Callas Line drawings prepared by B.L. Mamet and Stephen Scott Layout and design by Lisa Baserga UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mamet, Bernard L. Micropaleontological zonation (foraminifers, algae) and stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, southeastern Alaska / by Bernard L. Mamet, Sylvie Pinard, and Augustus K. Armstrong. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2031) Includes bibtiographical references. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Carboniferous. 2. Geology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 3. Foraminifera, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 4. Algae, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 5. Paleontology- Carboniferous. 6. Paleontology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. I. Pinard, Sylvie. II. Armstrong, Augustus K. Ill. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2031 [QE671I 557.3 s--dc20 [551.7'5'097982] 92-32905 CIP CONTENTS Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands National Monument / Inventory of Water Rights and Groundwater Evaluation Data
    WHITE SANDS NATIONAL MONUMENT INVENTORY OF WATER RIGHTS AND GROUNDWATER EVALUATION DATA prepared by Eileen H. Embid Steven T. Finch, Jr., CPG JOHN SHOMAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water Resource and Environmental Consultants 2611 Broadbent Parkway NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107 505-345-3407 prepared for White Sands National Monument New Mexico November 2011 WHITE SANDS NATIONAL MONUMENT INVENTORY OF WATER RIGHTS AND GROUNDWATER EVALUATION DATA prepared by Eileen H. Embid Steven T. Finch, Jr., CPG JOHN SHOMAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water Resource and Environmental Consultants 2611 Broadbent Parkway NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107 505-345-3407 www.shomaker.com prepared for White Sands National Monument New Mexico November 2011 JSAI ii CONTENTS page 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WELL AND WATER-LEVEL INVENTORY.................................................................... 2 2.1 Water-Rights Records ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Well and Water-Level Data.............................................................................................. 4 2.2 Spring Data....................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 DATABASE......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Database Structure...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippian Barnett Formation: a Source-Rock, Seal, and Reservoir Produced by Early Carboniferous Flooding of the Texas C
    THE MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT FORMATION: A SOURCE-ROCK, SEAL, AND RESERVOIR PRODUCED BY EARLY CARBONIFEROUS FLOODING OF THE TEXAS CRATON Stephen C. Ruppel and Jeffery Kane Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin,. TX ABSTRACT The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) was a time of crustal downwarping and flooding of southern Texas region. Mississippian facies documenting this flooding include a basal, updip, shallow to deep water carbonate succession and an overlying, downdip, deep water, fine grained siliciclastic mudrock succession. The basal carbonate succession, termed the Mississippian Limestone in the Permian Basin, includes the Chappel of the Llano Uplift and the Caballero-Lake Valley of southern New Mexico outcrops. These rocks document the margins of an extensive carbonate platform that occupied much of the western U.S. during the middle developed Mississippian. The overlying siliciclastic mudrock succession includes the Barnett formation of the Permian and Ft. Worth Basins and the Rancheria Formation of southern New Mexico outcrops. These rocks accumulated by autochthonous hemipelagic sedimentation and allochthonous mass gravity transport in low energy, below wave base, dysaerobic conditions in a platform marginal deep water basin formed on the southern margin of the Laurussian platform. The carbonate section is poorly known and only of minor importance as a hydrocarbon reservoir in the Permian Basin. Key insights into the detailed character and architecture of these rocks are provided by analogous outcrops of the Lake Valley outcrop succession in New Mexico. The overlying Barnett mudrock succession, long recognized as a hydrocarbon source rock, is similarly poorly known but has recently attracted great attention as a target for gas exploration and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico
    Report of Investigations No. 201 Stratigraphic Analysis of the Upper Devonian Woodford Formation, Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico John B. Comer* *Current address Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 47405 1991 Bureau of Economic Geology • W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-7508 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................5 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................................5 Age and Correlation ........................................................................................................6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................6 Western Outcrop Belt ......................................................................................................6 Central Texas ...................................................................................................................7 Northeastern Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Climate in New Mexico
    [finfERICAN JovnNaI. OF SCIENCE, VOX.. 249, FEBRUARY, 1961, PP. 162-1681 PLEISTOCENE CLIMATE IN NEW MEXICO LUNA B. LEOPOLD ABSTRACT. Recently published meridional profiles of the mean tempera- ture of the free atmosphere provide an opportunity to apply meteorologic upper air data to the problem of snowlines. The modern snowline of the Rocky Mountains is shown to be nearly identical to the mean level of the 0°C. isotherm for the summer months, corroborating the well-known postu- late that snowltines are controlled by summer temperatures. This postulate is applied in speculating on the annual march of temperature in glacial time in New Mexico. The mean annual temperature so derived is applied to the hydrologic balance of a late Pleistocene lake in the closed bwin of Estancia, New Mexico, in an attempt to check the computation for that lake made by Antevs. ine that separates areas of snow accumulation from T'"those lower areas where snow disappears in summer is the regional snowline (Flint, 1947). The Pleistocene snowline dis- cussed here is the approximation furnished by the level of cirque excavation. The altitude of the snowline of Wisconsin time mas approxi- mately 12,000 feet in the southern Rocky Mountains and dc- creased in height northward. Data on the elevations of Wiscon- sin and the present snowlines have been pubIished by mute (1928) and Louis (1926). Depending on how much snow blows over the mountain crest, the snowline on an individual mountain range is not at the same elevation on opposite sides. This was true in Wisconsin time as well as at present and contributes to the difficulties of establishing the exact position of the Wiscon- sin snowline.
    [Show full text]
  • GRE Scoping Summary for White Sands National Monument
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Division Prepared by Katie KellerLynn National Park Service June 10, 2008 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this report), digital geologic map, and geologic resource evaluation report. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The purpose of these meetings is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and potential monitoring and research needs. In 2003 the Geologic Resource Division (GRD) coordinated a Geoindicators scoping meeting for White Sands National Monument. This meeting was in response to a technical assistance request from park managers, who wanted input on the geologic resources at White Sands National Monument for their resource management plan. Recognizing that the Geoindicators scoping process could satisfy this request, GRD staff coordinated a scoping meeting with park staff and cooperators (table 1, p. 20). The current Geologic Resource Evaluation Program supercedes the Geoindicators process. On November 14, 2007, GRE staff and cooperators (table 2, p. 20) convened during a follow-up meeting to ensure all features and processes now discussed as part of the GRE process were adequately covered by the preexisting Geoindicators report. Scoping included a field trip led by David Bustos (White Sands National Monument) for some of the participants on November 13, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • West Texas Geological Society Publications and Contents Purchase from West Texas Geological Society
    West Texas Geological Society Publications and Contents Purchase from West Texas Geological Society: http://www.wtgs.org/ 77-68 Geology of the Sacramento Mountains Otero County, New Mexico Regional Distribution of Phylloid Algal Mounds in Late Pennsylvanian and Wolfcampian Strata of Southern New Mexico James Lee Wilson Growth History of a Late Pennsylvanian Phylloid Algal Organic Buildup, Northern Sacramento Mains, New Mexico D.F. Toomey, J.L. Wilson, R. Rezak Paleoecological Evidence on the Origin of the Dry Canyon Pennsylvanian Bioherms James M. Parks Biohermal Submarine Cements, Laborcita Formation (Permian), Northern Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico John M. Cys and S.J. Mazzullo Carbonate and Siliciclastic Facies of the Gobbler Formation John C. Van Wagoner The Rancheria Formation: Mississippian Intracratonic Basinal Limestones Donald A. Yurewicz Stratigraphic and Structural Features of the Sacramento Mountain Escarpment, New Mexico Lloyd C. Pray Conglomeratic Lithofacies of the Laborcita and Abo Formations ( Wolfcampian), North Central Sacramento Mountains: Sedimentology and Tectonic Importance David J. Delgado Paleocaliche Textures from Wolfcampian Strata of the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico David J. Delgado Introduction to Road Logs Lloyd C. Pray Alamogordo to Alamo Canyon and the Western Sacramento Mountains Escarpment Field Guide and Road Log “A” Lloyd C. Pray Supplemental Field Guide to Southernmost Sacramento Mountains Escarpment – Agua Chiquita and Nigger Ed Canyons Lloyd C. Pray Alamogordo to Indian Wells Reentrant Field Guide and Road Log “B” Lloyd C. Pray Guide Locality B-1-West End of Horse Ridge John C. Van Wagoner 1 Field Guide and Road Log “C” Lloyd C. Pray Plate Shaped Calcareous Algae in Late Paleozoic Rocks of Midcontinent (abstract): James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Opportunities for Brackish
    CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR BRACKISH GROUNDWATER- RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT IN NEW MEXICO—PREDICTION HYDRO-SCIENCE FROM AN OCTOGENARIAN HYDROGEOLOGIST’S PERSPECTIVE Introduction to Part-2 of Invited Presentations on Desalination Science/Technology (Mike Hightower, SNL) and New Mexico’s Brackish Groundwater Resources to the Urban Land Institute-New Mexico Section, April 28, 2016 John W. Hawley, Ph.D., Emeritus Senior Environmental Geologist, N.M. Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources, NMIMT Visiting Senior Hydrogeologist, N.M. Water Resources Research Institute, NMSU dba HAWLEY GEOMATTERS [email protected] P.O. Box 4370, Albuquerque, NM 87196-4370; Phone (o) 505-255-4847, (c) 505-263-6921 PREFACE This informal “white paper” introduces a pptx presentation on “Challenges and Opportunities for Brackish Groundwater-Resource Development in New Mexico,” and includes representative slides and an expanded list of background references. Most illustrations with a GoogleTMearth base have been designed by Baird Swanson of Swanson Geoscience, LLC; and all hydrogeologic maps and cross sections were initially created by HAWLEY GEOMATTERS for the N.M. Water Resources Research Institute Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Project (TAAP). Since exposure to water-based realities in our dryland-culture can be a bit depressing, I’ll try to keep my remarks as optimistic and moist as possible. Also, since bad-news bearers have often met bad ends throughout history, it’s prudent to avoid doom and gloom scenarios whenever I can. So, emphasis here will be on places where de-watered aquifer spaces can be replenished through timely application of state-of-the-art Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) technology. Professional observations and opinions on the interlinkage of land, water, and energy resources reflects an early career in the New Mexico-West Texas region as a research geologist for the Soil Survey Investigations Division of the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS-now NRCS), with field headquarters at NMSU-Las Cruces (1962-1971), Texas Tech University-Lubbock (1971- 1974), N.M.
    [Show full text]