DOCSLIB.ORG

Download "WBWS Archsurvey.Pdf"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET DAHP Project Number: 2020-01-00313 Author: Kelly R. Bush and Paige E. Hawthorne Title of Report: Archaeological Investigation Report: Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Water Utility- Warm Beach Snohomish County, Washington Date of Report: January 8, 2019 County: Snohomish Section: 13, 24, 18, 19 Township: 31N Range: 3 and 4 Quad: Stanwood Acres: 764.8 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes No Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? Yes DAHP Case # No DAHP Archaeological Site #: ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD NO. 1, WATER UTILITY- WARM BEACH SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for: Snohomish County PUD No.1 January 8, 2019 Prepared by: 1229 Cleveland Avenue, Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 • Tel 360-826-4930 • Fax 360-826-4830 • www.equinoxerci.com CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR ................................................................................ Kelly R. Bush, MA LEAD AGENCY .................... Janet Cherry, Washington State Department of Health, Drinking Watetr REPORT AUTHORS ................................................ Kelly R. Bush, MA and Paige E. Hawthorne, MA GRAPHICS .............................................................................................................. Caspian Hester, BA FIELD RESEARCHERS ............................ Kelly R. Bush, Paige E. Hawthorne, MA, Caspian Hester, ...................................................Hayley Nichols, MA, Courtney Strehlow BA, and Jacob Wilmoth BA PROJECT CONTACT .................................................Max Selin, P.E., Snohomish County PUD No. 1 TRIBAL CONTACTS ....................................................... Kerry Lyste, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians ....................................................................................... Richard Young and Gene Enick, Tulalip Tribes DAHP CONTACTS ................................................................ Dr. Robert Whitlam, State Archaeologist ........................................................................................... Dr. Guy Tasa, State Physical Anthropologist Equinox Research and Consulting International Inc. (ERCI) would like to thank Snohomish County PUD for retaining us for this investigation and for their commitment to the process and archaeological resources. We extend our thanks to the representatives of the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, and the Tulalip Tribes for their insights and timely attention to our projects. The opinions and recommendations in this report are those of ERCI alone and do not necessarily reflect those held by any of the organizations or individuals mentioned above. Any errors or omissions are ERCI’s responsibility. ERCI—Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Warm Beach Snohomish County, Washington ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY County Snohomish TRS Township 31 N, Range 04 E, Sections 18, 19 Township 31 N, Range 03 E, Sections 13, 24 Quad Stanwood Parcel ID ROW Address ROW Property Owner ROW Area ~764.8 Lat/Long 48°10'5.61"N/ 122°20'50.82"W UTM Zone Zone 10 548517 Easting 5335163 Northing Elevation 30-230’ Nearest Water Body Puget Sound, Lake Martha Nearest Arch Site SN00364; SN00375; SN00004 within APE Soils Alderwood gravelly sandy loam; Everett very gravelly sandy loam; Kitsap silt loam; McKenna gravelly silt loam; Norma loam Geology Qtb, Qvt, Qva, and Qb DAHP No 2020-01-00313 In July 2019 Max Selin, P.E., of Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Water Utility, contacted Kelly R. Bush of Equinox Research and Consulting International Inc. (ERCI) to carry out a cultural resource investigation at the Town of Warm Beach, Snohomish County, Washington. On September 10 to October 11, 2019 ERCI undertook a research overview, an intensive pedestrian survey and a stratified subsurface shovel-testing program (193 subsurface shovel tests) to look for material traces of past human activity. The selection of locations for STs were determined based on the location of planned utility installments/replacements. No archaeological deposits were encountered. Overall there is a plethora of oral and written history about the land use in this neighborhood by both Native Americans and immigrants. There are historic burials that are known to tribal members and recorded on site forms very near to the project area. We have reduced the risk of encountered a large (village size) archaeological sited but there is still risk associated with small archaeological sites or objects and features. This is true for both precontact and historic components. No protected cultural resources were identified during our fieldwork. The management recommendations that we are now providing are based on our findings from this field investigation. We recommend that: 1. The proposed project proceed as planned with a UDP training for all workers on the site by a Professional Archaeologist and copy of the Unanticipated Discoveries Protocol (UDP) to be on site at all times (Appendix x). 2. The highest probability areas for precontact archaeological deposits are: a. All properties adjacent to the gully b. The south end of Soundview Drive NW, and c. Any work that might happen on the waterward side of Soundview Drive NW i. The project would benefit from having these areas constructed under an archaeological monitor. 3. We recognize that some areas in the project may have more historic refuse than others and there is a benefit to the project to develop an archaeological monitoring protocol to carry out should it become burdensome to call an archaeologist in everytime a bottle is found. ERCI—Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Warm Beach Snohomish County, Washington iii 4. In the event that any ground-disturbing activities or other project activities related to this development or in any future development uncover protected cultural material (e.g., bones, shell, stone or antler tools), all work in the immediate vicinity should stop, the area should be secured, and any equipment moved to a safe distance away from the location. The on-site superintendent should then follow the steps specified in the UDP (Appendix x). 5. In the event that any ground-disturbing activities or other project activities related to this development or in any future development uncover human remains, all work in the immediate vicinity should stop, the area should be secured, and any equipment moved to a safe distance away from the location. The on-site superintendent should then follow the steps specified in the UDP (Appendix 2). ERCI—Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Warm Beach Snohomish County, Washington iv CONTENTS CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY............................................................................................................. iii CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... v FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................. vi TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................... 4 3.0 TRIBAL CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................ 5 4.0 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 5 4.1 Physical Environment ................................................................................................................ 6 Geology and Soils........................................................................................................................... 6 Climate and Biota ........................................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Cultural Environment ................................................................................................................ 8 Archaeological cultures .................................................................................................................. 8 Salish Ethnography and Ethnohistory .......................................................................................... 10 Exploration and Immigration ....................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Previous Archaeology .............................................................................................................. 21 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites ................................................................................... 21 Previous Cultural Resources Surveys ........................................................................................... 22 Previous Cemetery Reports .......................................................................................................... 23 National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses Summer 2017 Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51 Sherri M. Middleton Central Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Middleton, Sherri M., "Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51" (2017). All Master's Theses. 711. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/711 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING A SURFACE COLLECTION TO AN EXCAVATED COLLECTION IN THE LOWER SKAGIT RIVER DELTA AT 45SK51 ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Cultural and Environmental Resource Management _______________________________________________________________________ by Sherri Michelle Middleton June 2017 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Assessment for the Mount Vernon Downtown Flood Protection Project Mount Vernon, Skagit County, Washington
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE MOUNT VERNON DOWNTOWN FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT MOUNT VERNON, SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY MARGARET BERGER AND SUSAN MEDVILLE GLENN D. HARTMANN, PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PREPARED FOR: PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING PO BOX 1599 EDMONDS, WA 98020 TECHNICAL REPORT #342 CRC PROJECT #0711I CULTURAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC. 8001 DAY ROAD WEST, SUITE B BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 98110 FEBRUARY 28, 2008 Executive Summary This report describes a cultural resources assessment for the Mount Vernon Downtown Flood Protection Project, in Mount Vernon, Skagit County, Washington. This assessment was conducted at the request of the City of Mount Vernon. This report is intended to serve as a component of preconstruction environmental review in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended. The project consists of modifications to the existing flood protection system. Project plans include raising the existing earthen levee, installing new levee and floodwall segments in some locations, and a new ring dike around the Mount Vernon Wastewater Treatment Plant. To accommodate levee improvements, seven downtown commercial buildings and a residence will be razed. Assessment methods included a review of relevant background literature and maps, archaeological field reconnaissance survey and testing, and a historic building survey. There are no archaeological sites recorded within the project. Archaeological testing conducted using a backhoe revealed thick alluvial deposits overlain, in places, by fill. No indications of buried archaeological sites were observed, and the project is considered to have a low potential to affect as-yet unknown cultural resources. No further archaeological investigations are recommended prior to commencement of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Name
    Cultural Resources Review of the Proposed Skagit County Jail Sites, Mount Vernon Skagit County, Washington. By: Garth L. Baldwin, M.A., RPA Prepared For: Maggie Buckley, LEED AP Associate / Environmental Planner David Evans and Associates, Inc 415 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 Drayton Technical Report: 0713J October 17, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Regulatory Environment ................................................................................................................. 2 Project Location and Description.................................................................................................... 2 Truck City / Suzanne Lane Site .................................................................................................. 5 Alf Christianson Seed Site .......................................................................................................... 5 Background Review ........................................................................................................................ 8 Archival Research ....................................................................................................................... 8 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................................... 9 Geomorphological Context ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Northwest Anthropology
    ISSN 1538-2834 JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGY Tales from the River Bank: An In Situ Stone Bowl Found along the Shores of the Salish Sea on the Southern Northwest Coast of British Columbia Rudy Reimer, Pierre Friele, Kenneth Fath, and John Clague .............................. 1 Localized Rituals and Individual Spirit Powers: Discerning Regional Autonomy through Religious Practices in the Coast Salish Past Bill Angelbeck ...................................................................................................... 27 Assessing the Nutritional Value of Freshwater Mussels on the Western Snake River Jeremy W. Johnson and Mark G. Plew ................................................................ 53 Snoqualmie Falls: The First Traditional Cultural Property in Washington State Listed in the National Register of Historic Places Jay Miller with Kenneth Tollefson ....................................................................... 67 The Archaeology of Obsidian Occurrence in Stone Tool Manufacture and Use along Two Reaches of the Northern Mid-Columbia River, Washington Sonja C. Kassa and Patrick T. McCutcheon ........................................................ 79 The Right Tool for the Job: Screen Size and Sample Size in Site Detection Bradley Bowden ................................................................................................... 103 Alphonse Louis Pinart among the Natives of Alaska Richard L. Bland .................................................................................................. 119 Spring
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit County Jail
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SKAGIT COUNTY JAIL December 2013 This Draft EIS was printed on 100% recycled paper. City of Mount Vernon Skagit County Community & Economic Development Planning & Development Services 910 Cleveland Avenue 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Skagit County Jail Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public Hearing Draft EIS Availability: In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Skagit County Jail has been issued and is available for your review and comment. The Draft EIS analyzes probable adverse environmental impacts of the proposed project alternatives and identifies possible mitigating measures for those impacts. Project Proponent: Skagit County Proposal Description: A new Skagit County Jail is being proposed to replace the existing, overcrowded Skagit County Jail. The proposed facility is considered an Essential Public Facility and would provide infrastructure to serve the residents, cities/towns, and tribes of Skagit County over the next 15 to 20 years. The project is also intended to accommodate future jail infrastructure needs over a 40‐ to 50‐year planning horizon. Alternatives being considered include no action and construction of a new, expanded jail facility on two alternative sites in the City of Mount Vernon—the Alf Christianson Seed Site and the Truck City/Suzanne Lane Site. A new, expanded jail would accommodate 400 inmate beds at immediate build‐out and up to 800 inmate beds at full build‐out. Additional services include administrative facilities, a medical diagnosis and treatment area, inmate rehabilitation programs, and a courtroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation for Washington State
    Historic Preservation for Washington State 24 CFR Part 58 General requirements Legislation Regulation Protect sites, buildings, and objects with national, National Historic Preservation 36 CFR Part 800 state or local historic, cultural and/or archeological Act, 16 U.S.C. 470(f), section 24 CFR Part 58.5(a) significance. Identify effects of project on properties 106 1. Does the project include new construction; demolition; the acquisition of undeveloped land; or any activity that requires ground disturbance (defined as one cubic foot of disturbed soil)? No: PROCEED to #2. Yes: PROCEED to #3 2. Does the project include repair, rehabilitation or conversion of existing properties; involve a structure that is MORE than 45 years old, is not in a historic district and has no ground disturbing activities? No: STOP here. The Section 106 Historic Preservation review is complete. Record your determination that there is no potential to cause effect, including the age of the existing building and information from the National Register to show that the activity is not in a historic district, on the Statutory Worksheet or Environmental Assessment. Yes: PROCEED to #3 3. Consult with SHPO or THPO and any tribes or groups that may have an interest in the project to determine if the project is eligible for the National Historic Register. • You must define and consider the Area of Potential Effect (APE). The APE is the geographic area within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties. The APE is influenced by the scale and nature of an undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Northwest Anthropology
    ISSN 1538-2834 JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGY A Collection of Papers from the Journal of Northwest Anthropology Associated with Traditional Indigenous Resources Part 1: General and Terrestrial Spring 2011 Electronic Edition JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGY FORMERLY NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH NOTES EDITORS Roderick Sprague Darby C. Stapp Deward E. Walker, Jr. South Fork Press Richland, WA University of Colorado ASSOCIATE EDITORS C. Melvin Aikens (University of Oregon), Haruo Aoki (University of California), Virginia Bevert (Yakama Tribe), Don E. Dumond (University of Oregon), Don D. Fowler (University of Nevada), Raymond D. Fogelson (University of Chicago), Rodney Frey (University of Idaho), Ronald Halfmoon (Lapwai), Tom F. S. McFeat (University of Toronto), and Jay Miller (Lushootseed Research). Julia G. Longenecker Operations Manager Kara N. Powers Editorial Assistant Diana C. Stapp Editorial Assistant Composed by South Fork Press, Moscow; Printed by Copy Court, Moscow; Bound by Arts & Crafts, Oakesdale. Missing issue claim limit 18 months. For back issues and catalogue of prices contact Coyote Press, P O Box 3377, Salinas, CA 93912. <http://www.californiaprehistory.com>. POLICY Journal of Northwest Anthropology, published semiannually by NARN, Inc. a non-profit organization in Richland, Washington, is a refereed journal and welcomes contributions of professional quality dealing with anthropological research in northwestern North America. Regular issues are published semiannually with additional memoirs issued as funds are available. Theoretical and interpretive studies and bibliographic works are preferred, although highly descriptive studies will be considered if they are theoretically significant. The primary criterion guiding selection of papers will be how much new research they can be expected to stimulate or facilitate.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Practice, Anarchism and Warfare in the Coast
    "THEY RECOGNIZE NO SUPERIOR CHIEF" POWER, PRACTICE, ANARCHISM AND WARFARE IN THE COAST SALISH PAST by WILLIAM O. ANGELBECK M.A., The University of Missouri, 1997 B.A., Southwest Missouri State University, 1992 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Anthropology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2009 © William O. Angelbeck, 2009 ABSTRACT This inquiry focuses on warfare in the Coast Salish past. Located in the Northwest Coast of North America, the Coast Salish practiced warfare as a basic component of their culture, and warfare manifested in two main periods. Archaeologically, fortified defensive sites were constructed from 1600 to 500 BP. According to ethnohistoric documents and oral histories, conflicts also erupted in the decades after Euroamerican contact, about AD 1790. For this study, I incorporate archaeological, ethnographic, ethnohistoric, and oral historical data for an investigation of warfare, including Coast Salish practices, protocols, and ideology. I assess the types of settings in which warfare occurred and evaluate the motivations for conflict. Finally, I examine these practices for insights into Coast Salish sociopolitical organization and how it altered through time. To evaluate the array of data, I employ a theoretical framework integrating power, practice, and anarchism. For power, I implement Eric Wolf’s modes of power to assess the intensity of conflicts and scales of defensive site construction. For practice, I harness Pierre Bourdieu’s materialist approach to culture, which is focused on historical, human actions, or practices; moreover, Bourdieu’s multiple types of capital provide a rubric for assessing motivations for warfare as individuals pursue and exchange various forms of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Eff Ett Af White Eantact an the Lawer Skagit Indians
    Eff ett af White Eantact an the Lawer Skagit Indians LEE Ann BEDDETT WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY ~~\ OCCASIONAL PAPER NUMBER 3 1972 ~ EFFECTS OF WHITE CONTACT ON THE LOWER SKAGIT INDIANS BY Lee Ann Bennett (This was a research paper submitted in partial ful­ fillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Washington State University, 1972.) WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, OCCASIONAL PAPER #3 P . O. Box 84, University Station, Seattle, Washington 98105 October, 1972 INTRODUCTION Ethnographic and ethnohistorical information relating specifically to the Lower Skagit Indians is scarce. Many sources discuss the Puget Sound area i n general, while others concentrate on those native groups inhabiting the San Juan Islands and the Gulf of Georgia. For this reason it was necessary to ascertain the degree of relationship between the Lower Skagit and their neighbors. While doing my research it soon became evident that a great deal of similarity existed among the eastern Puget Sound Indian groups. Dr. Erna Gunther (personal conununication) and Dr. June Collins (personal conununica­ tion) remarked on the conunonalities among the groups to the south, west, and north. Thus, similarities are evident between the Lower Skagit and the Swinomish, Samish, Skokomish, and Snohomish Indians, Both Dr. Wayne Suttles and Dr. Marian Smith, in their various publications, indicate a general cul­ tural homogeneity among the Coast Salish (cf. Elmendorf 1971). Where apparant discrepancies occurred among my sources, these were checked; the results are, hopefully, a fairly accurate picture of Lower Skagit history. Beginning in 1827, with the establishment of Fort Langley on the Fraser River, the Indians in northern Puget Sound have been in contact with Europeans.
    [Show full text]