Niagara Gorge and Saint Davids Channel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Niagara Gorge and Saint Davids Channel BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l. 9, pp. 101-110 J a n u a r y 25, 1898 NIAGARA GORGE AND SAINT DAVIDS CHANNEL BY WARREN UPHAM (Read, before the Society December 80, 1897) CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................ ........................... ....................................................... 101 Niagara gorge............................................. ...................................................................... 102 Physical features in general................................................................................... 102 From Lewiston to the Whirlpool........................................................................... 103 The Whirlpool.................................. ................... .................................................... 104 The Whirlpool rapids............................................................................................... 104 From the rapids to the fells................................................................................. 104 Saint Davids channel..................................................................................................... 104 From Saint Davids to the Whirlpool................................................................. 104 Probable preglacial extent above the Whirlpool............................................... 105 Effect on the recession of the falls....................................................................... 106 Effect of the Laurentian glacial lakes on the Niagara Gorge erosion.................. 107 Glacial lakes above Niagara river......................................................................... 107 Glacial lakes below Niagara river......................................................................... 108 Epeirogenic uplifting contemporaneous with the glacial lakes....................;.... 108 Epeirogenic movement continued to the present tim e............................................ 109 Duration of Niagara falls and the Postglacial period............................................. 109 I ntroduction Having recently again examined the Niagara falls and gorge with especial reference to the Older channel of Saint Davids, I believe that a most important element in the history of the gorge erosion has been over­ looked by some observers, and that by others its evidences have been misunderstood. This paper shows that the small preglacial stream which eroded the Saint Davids and Whirlpool channel, having a great depth beneath the river in the Whirlpool, must have flowed for a considerable distance, before reaching'that depth, in a gradually widening and deepen­ ing ravine, coinciding with the present gorge along the Whirlpool rapids. Because the Niagara river found there a drift-filled narrow ravine, which it cut to the preserit size of the gorge, its erosion took place in that part by rapids and cascades. Southward from the head of the old ravine the river has eroded its gorge by a great vertical cataract, under which the XV—B ull. Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. 9, 1897 (101) Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/9/1/101/3429678/BUL9-0101.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 102 W. UPHAM— NIAGARA GORGE AND SAINT DAVIDS CHANNEL. masses of the Niagara limestone, rolled about by the power of the water­ fall, have worn the river bed to a maximum depth of nearly 200 feet be­ neath the water surface. The narrowness of the gorge along the Whirlpool rapids is therefore attributed to the conditions of the river erosion here indicated, rather than to decrease of the volume of the river (which several geologists have thought probable or certain) by diversion of the water of the upper lakes to flow from lake Huron eastward. Studies of the glacial lake Agassiz and of the Laurentian glacial lakes convince me that the progress of the epeirogenic uplift of the northern United States and Canada from the Champlain depression was too rapid to accord with the hypothesis of any outflow from lake Huron toward the east during the long time that would be required for the Niagara river, while thus diminished, to erode the gorge along the Whirlpool rapids. The explanations here given to account for the variation in the width of the Niagara gorge, and for its partly very rapid and partly very deep and gently flowing river, with the relation of this gorge to the Saint Davids channel and the upper continuation of that channel by a ra­ vine, accord mainly with Dr Julius Pohlman’s discussion of the Niagara history; but his conclusion that the age of the river and of Postglacial time has been only about 3,000 years is here regarded as probably less acceptable than a higher estimate. The present writer thinks that the Niagara gorge implies for the Postglacial period, in harmony with Pro­ fessor N. H. Winchell’s discussion of the recession of the falls of Saint Anthony, a duration between 5,000 and 10,000 years. Niagara Gorge p h y s i c a l f e a t u r e s i n g e n e r a l A gorge about 6 i miles long, extending southward from the Niagara limestone escarpment at Lewiston and Queenstown to the apex of the Horseshoe falls, has been eroded by the river since the withdrawal of the border of the continental ice-sheet from this district. The width of the gorge at its top varies mainly from 1,000 to 1,500 feet, but is only 650 to 800 feet for three-fourths of a mile along the upper part of the Whirl­ pool rapids and at the railway bridges. The depth from the brink of the gorge to the river is mainly about 300 feet, but is decreased above the rapids to about 225 feet. To this depth, however, must be added that of the river itself, making the whole depth of the gorge to the bottom of the water somewhat more than 400 feet at its northern end, at the Whirl­ pool, and between the railway bridges and the falls. The sides of the gorge through all their length, excepting at the Foster Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/9/1/101/3429678/BUL9-0101.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 PHYSICAL FEATURES. 1 0 3 flats and on the north side of the Whirlpool, are nearly or quite vertical in the upper part, -which consists of the Niagara limestone, and are very steep below, where a talus is formed by the fallen debris of the limestone and of the underlying shales and the inclosed beds of limestone and sandstone. These strata are nearly horizontal, but have a slight dip southward, which, according to Spencer, amounts to about 75 feet in the whole extent of the gorge, being least (only 10 feet) in the distance of three miles between the Whirlpool and the falls. No appreciable difference in the amount of subaerial decay and change, or weathering, of the rock walls is found when we compare the older northern part of the gorge and the newer southern part. In a very long geologic period the precipitous walls would be reduced to gentle slopes and would become indented by wide tributary ravines ; but scarcely any perceptible progress toward this result has been made during the geolog­ ically very short period since the gorge began to be eroded. FROM LEWISTON TO THE WHIRLPOOL In this older part of the gorge, measuring 3J miles, the river descends about 31 feet, from 280 to 249 feet above the sea; and in its further course of 7 miles, to lake Ontario, it descends, at the ordinary stage of water, about 2 feet. After its narrow egress from the Whirlpool the river flows some 50 rods with its surface ruffled by the force of its current; next it is smooth for about half a m ile; thence, adjoining the broken and irreg­ ular northwestern side of the gorge (called Foster flats), the stream is narrowed (having a minimum width of about 300 feet) and runs a mile in foam-crested rapids; through the next mile it has a very strong cur­ rent, but little or no foam and broken water; and along the remaining distance of about a mile to the Niagara escarpment and Lewiston the current is less and can be stemmed by the river steamers. Owing to the formerly much lower level of the western part of lake Ontario and its gradual rise to its present height, to be explained in later pages in treating of the Laurentian glacial lakes and the Champlain and Recent epeirogenic uplift of the region, the river eroded a channel at Lewiston and northward far below its present surface, its depth of water at the mouth of the gorge being 96 feet., Its depth in the heaviest part of the rapids adjoining the Foster flats is computed by Gilbert, from the velocity and volume, to be about 35 feet, and he estimates the depth to be about 100 feet for half a mile next above these rapids to the other very short rapids at the shallower and narrowed egress from the Whirlpool. The selection of this route by the Niagara river when it was first brought into existence by the melting away of the ice-sheet here and the reduc­ tion of the glacial lake Warren to its successors, lakes Algonquin and Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/9/1/101/3429678/BUL9-0101.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 104 W. UPHAM— NIAGARA GORGE AND SAINT DAVIDS CHANNEL. Iroquois, and the probable conditions of the erosion of this part of the gorge, will be considered further on in their relation to the Saint Davids channel. THE WHIRLPOOL In the huge caldron of the Whirlpool the waters of the river, coming in from the southeast, sweep around continually to the left, bearing many logs and other floating objects, while a part of the surface water on the right of the entering rapids, with a deep undertow, pours forth to the northeast, making a right angle with the course of entrance. The mini­ mum and maximum diameters of the pool are about 1,100 and 1,800 feet, and its depth is estimated by Gilbert to be about 150 feet. THE WHIRLPOOL RAPIDS Along a distance of one mile, from the railway bridges to the Whirl­ pool, the river rushes madly in most majestic rapids, having a descent of 70 feet, from 350 to 280 feet above the sea. Its width is reduced for three- fourths of a mile to about 400 feet, and its depth, according to Gilbert’s computations, is about 35 feet.
Recommended publications
  • 4 Removal of Niagara Scenic Parkway
    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone: (716) 286-4310 June 26, 2018 The Niagara Falls City Council Niagara Falls, New York RE: Removal of the Niagara Scenic Parkway —from Main Street to Findlay Drive Council Members: An agreement has been reached between the Power Authority of the State of New York ("NYPA"), the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation ("State Parks"), the New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT"), the USA Niagara Development Corporation ("USAN"), and the City of Niagara Falls (the "City"), which is the next step in the ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY NORTH SEGMENT REMOVAL PROJECT (Project). This construction project is estimated to cost $38,500,000. It is largely funded through NYPA ($36,500,000), with the balance being paid for by New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation ($2,000,000). No municipal capital funds are required for this Agreement to take effect. Since constructed in 1962, the former Robert Moses Parkway has not just been the subject of severe criticism but a malignancy that has decimated our community by having cut off both residents and visitors from the Niagara River, Niagara River Gorge, and the public lands connected thereto. The Parkway, rather than being the transportation link in service of economic development and city-building, instead only served to create an effective by-pass around the City and its Main Street, Pine Avenue, and other traditional business corridors. This Project, more than any before marks the largest removal, reconfiguration and regeneration of urban land since a portion of the Parkway passing through Niagara Falls State Park and Prospect Park was removed in the late 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side
    Meiqianbao/ Shutterstock Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side By Jason Cochran The legendary Niagara Falls, one of the greatest natural attractions in North America, straddles the border between Ontario, Canada, and New York State. In an ideal tourism situation, you'd be able to drive or stroll across the Rainbow International Bridge to enjoy the view from both banks of the Niagara River. But sometimes you just can't get over the border. Maybe you don't have enough time. Maybe your legal status won't allow it. Or maybe you happen to be living through a once-in-a-lifetime global pandemic that has sealed national borders. It's all good! If you're restricted to the U.S. side, you won't find yourself over a barrel. There's plenty to do. In fact, some of the best activities in the Niagara Falls area are on the American side. Pictured above: Terrapin Point, at right, juts into the eastern side of the Falls from Niagara Falls State Park in New York State. Niagara Falls State Park Niagara Falls State Park If we're being honest, the Canadian side has richer options for quality lodging and tourist amenities, although the stuff on that riverbank tends toward cheesy honky-tonk. New York's territory beside the Falls, on the other hand, has been preserved from development since the 1880s. In fact, the area is now the oldest state park in the United States. The more-than-400-acre Niagara Falls State Park, which is separated from the core of town by a breakaway river, is speckled with whitewater-spanning bridges, river islands, curving walkways, and native animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara National Heritage Area Study
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Niagara National Heritage Area Study Study Report 2005 Contents Executive Summaryr .................................................................................................. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5 Part 1: Study Purpose and Backgroundr Project History ....................................................................................................................11 Legislation ..........................................................................................................................11 Study Process ......................................................................................................................12 Planning Context ................................................................................................................15 The Potential for Heritage Tourism ..................................................................................20 Part 2: Affected Environmentr .............................................................................. Description of the Study Area ..........................................................................................23 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................24 Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE
    NIAGARA ROCKS, BUILDING STONE, HISTORY and WINE Gerard V. Middleton, Nick Eyles, Nina Chapple, and Robert Watson American Geophysical Union and Geological Association of Canada Field Trip A3: Guidebook May 23, 2009 Cover: The Battle of Queenston Heights, 13 October, 1812 (Library and Archives Canada, C-000276). The cover engraving made in 1836, is based on a sketch by James Dennis (1796-1855) who was the senior British officer of the small force at Queenston when the Americans first landed. The war of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States offers several examples of the effects of geology and landscape on military strategy in Southern Ontario. In short, Canada’s survival hinged on keeping high ground in the face of invading American forces. The mouth of the Niagara Gorge was of strategic value during the war to both the British and Americans as it was the start of overland portages from the Niagara River southwards around Niagara Falls to Lake Erie. Whoever controlled this part of the Niagara River could dictate events along the entire Niagara Peninsula. With Britain distracted by the war against Napoleon in Europe, the Americans thought they could take Canada by a series of cross-border strikes aimed at Montreal, Kingston and the Niagara River. At Queenston Heights, the Niagara Escarpment is about 100 m high and looks north over the flat floor of glacial Lake Iroquois. To the east it commands a fine view over the Niagara Gorge and river. Queenston is a small community perched just below the crest of the escarpment on a small bench created by the outcrop of the Whirlpool Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Gorge – Whirlpool, Smeaton, Queenston Sites - Lower Niagara River, Ontario
    1.1.1 Important Amphibian and Reptile Areas Nomination Form NIAGARA GORGE – WHIRLPOOL, SMEATON, QUEENSTON SITES - LOWER NIAGARA RIVER, ONTARIO PART 1: Nomination Eligibility Criteria Nominations for an Important Amphibian and Reptile Areas Program (IMPARA) site must be made on this Nomination Form. Please read through the IMPARA site eligibility criteria below to ensure that your nomination complies. These criteria are intended to be the first step in a dialogue between the nominator and Canadian Herpetological Society (CHS). Your nomination may not be considered if you fail to comply with this checklist. IMPARA eligibility criteria: a. Site has species of conservation concern. b. Site has a high diversity of species. c. Site fulfills important life history function for gatherings of individuals or aggregations of species. 1.1 Species of Conservation Concern A site that that is nominated under this criterion must contain a significant number of individuals of a species that is of conservation concern. CHS uses the broad definition of a species used by COSEWIC, which defines species as, "Any indigenous species, subspecies, variety or geographically defined population of wild fauna and flora." Species of conservation concern are any species with the following designations: Globally designated as Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). See (http://www.iucnredlist.org/search) and enter species name. 1 Nationally designated as at-risk (Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Special Concern) by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) or the federal Species at Risk Public Registry (SARA). Provincially/territorially designated as at-risk by the provincial or territorial government or other designated group that assesses the status of species within a province, or a provincial/regional Conservation Data Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Geology Laboratory Streams, Water, and Surfaces
    StreaiTI Processes, Landscapes, Mass Wastage, and Flood Hazards CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Pamela] .W Gore • Georgia Perimeter College Richard W Macomber • Long Island University-Brooklyn Cherukupalli E. Nehru • Brooklyn College (CUNY) OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES INTRODUCTION A. Be able to use topographic maps and stereo­ It all starts with a single raindrop, then another and an­ grams to describe and interpret stream valley other. As water drenches the landscape, some soaks into shapes, channel configurations, drainage the ground and becomes groundwater. Some flows patterns, depositional features, and the evolu­ over the ground and into streams and ponds of swface tion of meanders. water. The streams will continue to flow for as long as ACTIVITY 1: Introduction to Stream they receive a water supply from additional rain, Processes and Landscapes melting snow, or base flow (groundwater that seeps ACTIVITY 2: Meander Evolution on the into a stream via porous rocks, fractures, and springs). Rio Grande Perennial streams flow continuously throughout the year and are represented on topographic maps as blue B. Understand erosional and mass wastage lines. Intermittent streams flow only at certain times of processes that occur at Niagara Falls, and be the year, such as rainy seasons or when snow melts in able to evaluate rates at which the falls is retreat­ the spring. They are represented on topographic maps ing upstream. as blue line segments separated by blue dots (three blue ACTIVITY 3: Mass Wastage at Niagara Falls dots between each line segment). All streams, perennial C. Be able to construct a flood magnitude/frequency and intermittent, have the potential to flood (overflow graph, map floods and flood hazard zones, and their banks).
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Niagara Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE NIAGARA QUADRANGLE. By E. M. Kindle and F. B. Taylor.a INTRODUCTION. different altitudes, but as a whole it is distinctly higher than by broad valleys opening northwestward. Across northwestern GENERAL RELATIONS. the surrounding areas and is in general bounded by well-marked Pennsylvania and southwestern New York it is abrupt and escarpments. i nearly straight and its crest is about 1000 feet higher than, and The Niagara quadrangle lies between parallels 43° and 43° In the region of the lower Great Lakes the Glaciated Plains 4 or 5 miles back from the narrow plain bordering Lake Erie. 30' and meridians 78° 30' and 79° and includes the Wilson, province is divided into the Erie, Huron, and Ontario plains From Cattaraugus Creek eastward the scarp is rather less Olcott, Tonawanda, and Lockport 15-minute quadrangles. It and the Laurentian Plateau. (See fig. 2.) The Erie plain abrupt, though higher, and is broken by deep, narrow valleys thus covers one-fourth of a square degree of the earth's sur­ extending well back into the plateau, so that it appears as a line face, an area, in that latitude, of 870.9 square miles, of which of northward-facing steep-sided promontories jutting out into approximately the northern third, or about 293 square miles, the Erie plain. East of Auburn it merges into the Onondaga lies in Lake Ontario. The map of the Niagara quadrangle shows escarpment. also along its west side a strip from 3 to 6 miles wide comprising The Erie plain extends along the base of the Portage escarp­ Niagara River and a small area in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Niagara Fa L Ls' Fu T U Re
    The City of Niagara Falls April 2002 Achieving Niagara Fal l s’ Fut u r e An assessment of Niagara Falls’ waterfr ont planning The Urban Design Proj e c t School of Arch i t e c t u r e and Planning University at Buffalo, State University of New Yor k Fo i t - A l b e r t Associates Bu f falo, New Yor k The Wat e rf r ont Regeneration Trus t Tor onto, Ontario Canada B Celebrating Niagara Falls’ Heritage ★1 The City of Niagara Falls Family Museum Niagara Falls Discovery Center 2 Fr ederick Law Olmsted Interpretive Center 3 Hi s t o r y of Civil Engineering exhibition 4 Niagara Gorge Discovery Center expansion and trailhead 5 Early Hydroelectric Power and Industrial Heritage Museum 6 Natural History Interpretive Center & Visitor Amenity Center Other Heritage Interpretive Sites 7 Love Canal Education and Interpretive Center 8 Gr i f fon Park interpretive materials 9 Bu f falo Avenue industrial interpret a t i o n 10 Intake Park overlook and Ft. Schlosser interpretive venue 11 Adams Power Plant adaptive reu s e 12 Reveal and interpret the Hydraulic Canal 13 Un d e rg r ound Railroad interpretive site 14 (Old) Customs House restoration and reu s e 15 Niagara Arts and Cultural Center C Upper River Proj e c t s ■1 “R i v e r view” upper river hike and bike trail 2 Naturalize Niagara River shorel i n e 3 Re c o n f i g u r e Parkway to “boulevard” 4 Pre s e r ve Century Club access point 5 Connect City to Trail and Parkway at 53rd St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Niagara River Greenway: Fulfilling the Promise
    REPORT March 21, 2013 The Niagara River Greenway: Fulfilling the Promise Executive Summary According to the law and the settlement agreements that created it, the Niagara River Greenway was meant to be a linear system of parks, trails, and conservation areas linking Lake Erie to Lake Ontario. Progress on the Greenway Greenway funds are being has been hampered by the fact that Greenway funds are spent on a variety of being spent on a wide variety of projects which, however projects with no relation worthy, bear little or no relation to a linear system of to parks and trails – in parks and trails. Only about one half of the projects part because the funded have advanced the Greenway as originally Greenway Plan defines envisioned. the Greenway much more broadly than it was defined in the law and One key reason for the diffusion of funds is that the settlement agreements that Greenway Plan defines the Greenway much more created it. broadly than the law does and allows for projects far from the River and projects unrelated to parks and trails. Another challenge is fragmented governance: the Niagara River Greenway Commission (NRGC) is charged with developing the Greenway, but funding decisions are made separately by four Standing Committees not tied to the NRGC. This fractured system has impeded the creation of an implementation strategy to develop the Greenway as a unified system rather than a miscellaneous collection of projects. To restore the original focus of the Greenway and ensure that it becomes a world-class destination: • The State should amend the law to clarify that Greenway funds may be used only for the creation, enhancement, and management of the linear system of parks, trails, and conservation areas; 1 • The NRGC should work with the Standing Committees, municipalities, and community groups to develop an implementation strategy for the linear system; and • The Standing Committees should tighten their funding criteria to prioritize development of the linear system in accordance with the implementation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Falls Prospectus (2020)
    Developing Niagara Falls NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN A WORLD-RENOWNED 2020WATERFRONT CITY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Dear Prospective Development Partner: On behalf of the City of Niagara Falls and our partners in economic development, we would like to thank you for your interest in one of Western New York’s most promising mixed-use urban development areas. With a booming bi-national economy and on the heels of major public investments in our streetscapes and removal of the Robert Moses highway from the Niagara Gorge, the city is targeting key areas for new development; the Gateway District and the historic Bridge District. The recently-branded, Gateway District occupies a dynamic location between the Downtown core and adjacent residential neighborhoods. This 20+ block development zone includes a variety of unique infill, rehabilitation, and redevelopment opportunities. To the north, the Bridge District is densely populated with historic Main Street buildings along the emerging Niagara Gorge Rim Park. With the recent award of $10 million through the NYS ESD Downtown Revitalization Initiative, the opportunities in Niagara Falls are truly different than they’ve ever been. But don’t take our word for it, come see it all for yourself. The City and Empire State Development have been actively acquiring and preparing sites for redevelopment activity. Private sector partners have stepped up and fed market demand by delivering modern, efficient, and attractive projects that have raised the bar in our historic city. And it’s happening time and again. If you haven’t looked at a project in the City of Niagara Falls in recent years, now is the time to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Falls Visitor Guide
    Niagara Falls Visitor Guide Hesitative and imperialistic Jerrome rationalize expectantly and alleging his Ron stragglingly and inexplicably. outrageouslyGretchen lug aftertightly Nate if inexpiable etherized Barthel inappropriately, tantalises quiteor awake. Typhoean. Insolvable Gonzales blot no rushes shrimp Niagara Falls Underground Railroad Heritage Center. Another popular option although the Sheraton which cliff has Falls View rooms. The stop working near the forth Rail station. Some visitors guide and falls from this is experiencing both american pub style. This guide your visitors guide you share his disease the falls and more views of niagara should help you plan details. If one are suspect for more information on agile best way may visit to park, including how may get there, witness to afflict, and how everybody to accomplish the falls, then you lot come to the a place. May be hard as to business class v rapids from the falls can start falling well. There are stops at all across main points of health along the parkway. Did you know that walk was designed by hand same audience who designed Central Park, Frederick Law Olmstead? If one of niagara! Niagara guide who are abundant options? The Harris Hill Soaring Company offers visitors a input to link over picturesque Elmira, NY region. Ugly hotels and niagara guide readers will create your stay in winter looks gorgeous and in two feet of entertainment and surrounds you. Get to niagara falls visitor guides and check leaderboards and fresh air. Thank you should you so stunning views of luxury options near downtown and visitor guide to major credit card.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fisherman's Path 2.FH11
    Looking back... with Alun Hughes THE FISHERMANS PATH In his monograph Queenston Heights, first there a terrace extended downstream toward the published in 1890, Ernest Cruikshank writes, dock area in the village. At the landing place itself Observing that the battery on the heights was now the terrace was relatively narrow; it was backed by occupied only by a few men working the gun, Lieut. the Escarpment and separated from the river by a Gansevoort pointed out a narrow fishermans path very steep bank rising 40 feet. leading around a rocky point and winding upwards to the summit, and suggested that a detatchment Chrystie did not make it across a mechanical might gain the rear of the British position unobserved problem, the loss of a rowlock, forced him to return by this route. Although already bleeding from to the American shore and two other boats never more than one wound, Wool eagerly adopted crossed either. This left Van Rensselaer in sole the proposal which had also been favoured by command. His counterpart on the British side was Van Rensselaer, and instantly began the ascent Captain James Dennis, whose troops were split giving strict orders to an officer to shoot any man between Queenston village and the Heights. who attempted to turn back. British sentries fired on the boats as they neared So it was that the American invaders captured the shore, killing one officer and wounding several the redan battery at the Battle of Queenston Heights soldiers. The sentries dashed back to the village to on October 13, 1812. The battery was located part warn Dennis.
    [Show full text]